1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science
  4. Volume 71, 2021
  5. Article

Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science

Volume 71, 2021

Implications of New Physics Models for the Couplings of the Higgs Boson

Abstract

It has been almost a decade since the first hints of the Higgs boson discovery began to emerge from CERN, making a review of our updated expectations for the Higgs boson properties, in light of New Physics models, timely. In this review I attempt to draw connections between modified Higgs boson couplings and the big questions that broad classes of New Physics models aim to answer. Questions considered include whether the Higgs boson is composite and whether a new space-time supersymmetry exists. The goal is to present these topics, framed in reference to the Higgs boson, in a conceptually driven manner and, to make them accessible to a relatively broad audience, without a great deal of technicality.

Keyword(s): baryogenesis, composite, couplings, Higgs boson, supersymmetry
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-nucl-122320-041022
2021-09-21
2024-10-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/nucl/71/1/annurev-nucl-122320-041022.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-nucl-122320-041022&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1. 
    Weinberg S. Dreams of a Final Theory New York: Pantheon 1992.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. 2. 
    Aad G, et al. (ATLAS Collab.) Phys. Lett. B 716:1 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. 3. 
    Chatrchyan S, et al. (CMS Collab.) Phys. Lett. B 716:30 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. 4. 
    Ellis JR, Gaillard MK, Nanopoulos DV Nucl. Phys. B 106:292 1976.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 5. 
    Djouadi A Phys. Rep. 457:1 2008.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. 6. 
    Djouadi A Phys. Rep. 459:1 2008.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 7. 
    Zyla PA, et al. (Part. Data Group) PTEP 2020:083C01 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 8. 
    de Blas J, et al J. High Energy Phys. 2001:139 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. 9. 
    Patt B, Wilczek F. arXiv:hep-ph/0605188 2006.
  10. 10. 
    Craig N, Englert C, McCullough M Phys. Rev. Lett. 111:121803 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 11. 
    Craig N, et al J. High Energy Phys. 1602:127 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. 12. 
    Englert C, Jaeckel J, Spannowsky M, Stylianou P Phys. Lett. B 806:135526 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. 13. 
    Georgi H Nucl. Phys. B 361:339 1991.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 14. 
    Kaplan DB, Georgi H, Dimopoulos S Phys. Lett. B 136:187 1984.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. 15. 
    Hill CT, Simmons EH Phys. Rep. 381:235 (2003). Erratum. Phys. Rep. 390:553 2004.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. 16. 
    Peskin ME, Takeuchi T Phys. Rev. Lett. 65:964 1990.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 17. 
    Peskin ME, Takeuchi T Phys. Rev. D 46:381 1992.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 18. 
    Giudice GF, Grojean C, Pomarol A, Rattazzi R J. High Energy Phys. 0706:045 2007.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. 19. 
    Contino R. arXiv:1005.4269 [hep-ph] 2010.
  20. 20. 
    Bellazzini B, Csáki C, Serra J Eur. Phys. J. C 74:2766 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. 21. 
    Panico G, Wulzer A. Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 913: The Composite Nambu-Goldstone Higgs Cham, Switz: Springer 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. 22. 
    Csáki C, Grojean C, Terning J Rev. Mod. Phys. 88:045001 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. 23. 
    Csáki C, Tanedo P. Beyond the Standard Model Rep. UCI-TR-2016-01 CERN Geneva: 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. 24. 
    Falkowski A Phys. Rev. D 77:055018 2008.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. 25. 
    Low I, Rattazzi R, Vichi A J. High Energy Phys. 1004:126 2010.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. 26. 
    Low I, Vichi A Phys. Rev. D 84:045019 2011.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 27. 
    Montull M, Riva F, Salvioni E, Torre R Phys. Rev. D 88:095006 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. 28. 
    Carena M, Da Rold L, Pontón E J. High Energy Phys. 1406:159 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 29. 
    Liu D, Low I, Wagner CEM Phys. Rev. D 96:035013 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. 30. 
    Callan CG Jr., Coleman SR, Wess J, Zumino B Phys. Rev. 177:2247 1969.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 31. 
    Agashe K, Contino R, Pomarol A Nucl. Phys. B 719:165 2005.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. 32. 
    Arkani-Hamed N, Cohen AG, Georgi H Phys. Lett. B 513:232 2001.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. 33. 
    Arkani-Hamed N, Cohen AG, Katz E, Nelson AE J. High Energy Phys. 0207:034 2002.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. 34. 
    Chacko Z, Goh HS, Harnik R Phys. Rev. Lett. 96:231802 2006.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. 35. 
    Chacko Z, Goh HS, Harnik R J. High Energy Phys. 0601:108 2006.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. 36. 
    Rattazzi R, Zaffaroni A J. High Energy Phys. 0104:021 2001.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. 37. 
    Geller M, Telem O Phys. Rev. Lett. 114:191801 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. 38. 
    Contino R, Nomura Y, Pomarol A Nucl. Phys. B 671:148 2003.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 39. 
    Arkani-Hamed N, Dimopoulos S, Dvali GR Phys. Lett. B 429:263 1998.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. 40. 
    Randall L, Sundrum R Phys. Rev. Lett. 83:3370 1999.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. 41. 
    Thamm A, Torre R, Wulzer A J. High Energy Phys. 1507:100 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. 42. 
    Pappadopulo D, Thamm A, Torre R, Wulzer A J. High Energy Phys. 1409:60 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. 43. 
    De Simone A, Matsedonskyi O, Rattazzi R, Wulzer A J. High Energy Phys. 1304:4 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. 44. 
    Schwartz MD. Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. 45. 
    Haag R, Lopuszanski JT, Sohnius M Nucl. Phys. B 88:257 1975.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. 46. 
    Gupta RS, Montull M, Riva F J. High Energy Phys. 1304:132 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. 47. 
    Gupta RS, Rzehak H, Wells JD Phys. Rev. D 86:095001 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. 48. 
    Carmi D, Falkowski A, Kuflik E, Volansky T J. High Energy Phys. 1207:136 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. 49. 
    Davies R, March-Russell J, McCullough M J. High Energy Phys. 1104:108 2011.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. 50. 
    Gunion JF, Haber HE Phys. Rev. D 67:075019 2003.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. 51. 
    Craig N, Galloway J, Thomas S. arXiv:1305.2424 [hep-ph] 2013.
  52. 52. 
    CMS Collab. Search for heavy Higgs bosons decaying to a top quark pair in proton-proton collisions at = 13 TeV Rep. CMS-PAS-HIG-17-027 CERN Geneva: 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. 53. 
    Altmannshofer W, Straub DM J. High Energy Phys. 1009:78 2010.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. 54. 
    Katz A, Reece M, Sajjad A J. High Energy Phys. 1410:102 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. 55. 
    ATLAS Collab. SUSY July 2020 summary plot update Rep. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2020-020 CERN Geneva: 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. 56. 
    Sirunyan AM, et al. (CMS Collab.) J. High Energy Phys. 2005:32 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. 57. 
    Azatov A, Contino R, Panico G, Son M Phys. Rev. D 92:035001 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. 58. 
    Di Vita S, et al J. High Energy Phys. 1709:69 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. 59. 
    Arco F, Heinemeyer S, Herrero MJ Eur. Phys. J. C 80:884 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. 60. 
    Sakharov AD Sov. Phys. Usp. 34:392 1991.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. 61. 
    Katz A, Perelstein M J. High Energy Phys. 1407:108 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. 62. 
    Heinemann B, Nir Y Usp. Fiz. Nauk 189:985 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. 63. 
    Ramsey-Musolf MJ J. High Energy Phys. 2009:179 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. 64. 
    Choi J, Volkas RR Phys. Lett. B 317:385 1993.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. 65. 
    Espinosa JR, Konstandin T, Riva F Nucl. Phys. B 854:592 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. 66. 
    Noble A, Perelstein M Phys. Rev. D 78:063518 2008.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. 67. 
    Cline JM, Kainulainen K J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 1301:012 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. 68. 
    Barger V, et al Phys. Rev. D 77:035005 2008.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. 69. 
    Alanne T, Tuominen K, Vaskonen V Nucl. Phys. B 889:692 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. 70. 
    Curtin D, Meade P, Yu CT J. High Energy Phys. 1411:127 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. 71. 
    Chala M, Krause C, Nardini G J. High Energy Phys. 1807:62 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. 72. 
    Di Vita S, et al J. High Energy Phys. 1802:178 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. 73. 
    Caprini C, et al J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 1604:001 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. 74. 
    Caprini C, et al J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2003:024 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. 75. 
    Zhang XM Phys. Rev. D 47:3065 1993.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. 76. 
    Grojean C, Servant G, Wells JD Phys. Rev. D 71:036001 2005.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 77. 
    Delaunay C, Grojean C, Wells JD J. High Energy Phys. 0804:029 2008.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. 78. 
    Bödeker D, Fromme L, Huber SJ, Seniuch M J. High Energy Phys. 0502:026 2005.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. 79. 
    Harman CPD, Huber SJ J. High Energy Phys. 1606:5 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. 80. 
    de Vries J, Postma M, van de Vis J, White G J. High Energy Phys. 1801:89 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. 81. 
    Huber SJ, Sopena M. arXiv:1302.1044 [hep-ph] 2013.
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-nucl-122320-041022
Loading
Implications of New Physics Models for the Couplings of the Higgs Boson
Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 71, 529 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-122320-041022
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-nucl-122320-041022
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-nucl-122320-041022
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error