1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Psychology
  4. Volume 71, 2020
  5. Article

Annual Review of Psychology

Volume 71, 2020

Remembering: An Activity of Mind and Brain

Abstract

I present the case for viewing human memory as a set of dynamic processes rather than as structural entities or memory stores. This perspective stems largely from the construct of levels of processing, reflecting work I published with Robert Lockhart and with Endel Tulving. I describe the personal and professional contexts in which these and other ideas evolved, and I discuss criticisms of the ideas and our responses to critics. I also show how later versions of a processing approach to memory may fit with current findings and theories in memory research. In related work I have been involved in studies of cognitive aging, and I describe some theoretical and empirical points deriving from this aspect of my research efforts. Finally, I deal briefly with some experiments and reflections on divided attention, consolidation, and bilingualism and touch upon the neural bases of a processing approach.

Keyword(s): attention, autobiography, cognitive aging, cognitive neuroscience, divided attention, levels of processing, memory
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-051027
2020-01-04
2025-05-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/psych/71/1/annurev-psych-010419-051027.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-051027&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abutalebi J, Canini M, Della Rosa PA, Green DW, Weekes BS 2015. The neuroprotective effects of bilingualism upon the inferior parietal lobule: a structural neuroimaging study in aging Chinese bilinguals. J. Neurolinguist. 33:3–13
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Adesope OO, Lavin T, Thompson T, Ungerleider C 2010. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cognitive correlates of bilingualism. Rev. Educ. Res. 80:207–45
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Alladi S, Bak TH, Duggirala V, Surampudi B, Shailaja M et al. 2013. Bilingualism delays age at onset of dementia, independent of education and immigration status. Neurology 81:1938–44
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Alvarez P, Squire LR. 1994. Memory consolidation and the medial-temporal lobe: a simple network model. PNAS 91:7041–45
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson JR, Reder LM. 1979. An elaborative processing explanation of depth of processing. Levels of Processing in Human Memory LS Cermak, FIM Craik 385–403 Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Atkinson RC, Shiffrin RM. 1968. Human memory: a proposed system and its control processes. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory KW Spence, JT Spence 89–195 New York: Academic
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Baddeley AD. 1978. The trouble with levels: a reexamination of Craik and Lockhart's framework for memory research. Psychol. Rev. 85:139–52
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Baddeley AD. 2012. Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 63:1–29
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Baddeley AD, Hitch GJ. 2017. Is the levels of processing effect language-limited?. J. Mem. Lang. 92:1–13
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Baddeley AD, Lewis V, Eldridge M, Thomson N 1984. Attention and retrieval from long-term memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 113:518–40
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bartlett FC. 1932. Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bialystok E. 2017. The bilingual adaptation: how minds accommodate experience. Psychol. Bull. 143:233–62
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bialystok E, Craik FIM, Freedman M 2007. Bilingualism as a protection against the onset of symptoms of dementia. Neuropsychologia 45:459–64
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Bialystok E, Craik FIM, Grady CL, Chau W, Ishii R et al. 2005. Effect of bilingualism on cognitive control in the Simon task: evidence from MEG. NeuroImage 24:40–49
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Bialystok E, Craik FIM, Klein R, Viswanathan M 2004. Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: evidence from the Simon task. Psychol. Aging 19:290–303
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Bialystok E, Craik FIM, Luk G 2008. Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 34:859–73
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Bialystok E, Craik FIM, Luk G 2012. Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain. Trends Cogn. Soc. 16:240–50
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Blumenfeld HK, Marian V. 2014. Cognitive control in bilinguals: advantages in stimulus-stimulus inhibition. Biling. Lang. Cogn. 17:610–29
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Bower GH, Clark MC, Lesgold AM, Winzenz D 1969. Hierarchical retrieval schemes in recall of categorized word lists. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 8:323–43
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Broadbent DE. 1958. Perception and Communication Oxford, UK: Pergamon
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Bruner JS. 1973. Beyond the Information Given: Studies in the Psychology of Knowing New York: Norton
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Cabeza R, Grady CL, Nyberg L, McIntosh AR, Tulving E et al. 1997. Age-related differences in neural activity during memory encoding and retrieval: a positron emission tomography study. J. Neurosci. 17:391–400
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Cermak LS. 1972. Human Memory: Research and Theory New York: Ronald Press
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Cermak LS, Craik FIM. 1979. Levels of Processing in Human Memory Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Challis BH, Velichkovsky BM, Craik FIM 1996. Levels-of-processing effects on a variety of memory tasks: new findings and theoretical implications. Conscious. Cogn. 5:142–64
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Colzato LS, Bajo MT, van den Wildenberg W, Paolieri D, Nieuwenhuis SLA et al. 2008. How does bilingualism improve executive control? A comparison of active and reactive inhibition mechanisms. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 34:302–12
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Corkin S. 2002. What's new with the amnesic patient HM?. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3:153–60
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Costa A, Hernández M, Sebastián-Gallés N 2008. Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: evidence from the ANT task. Cognition 106:59–86
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Cowan N. 1999. An embedded-process model of working memory. Models of Working Memory A Miyake, P Shah 62–101 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Craik FIM. 1968a. Types of error in free recall. Psychon. Sci. 10:353–54
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Craik FIM. 1968b. Two components in free recall. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 7:996–1004
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Craik FIM. 1970. The fate of primary memory items in free recall. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 9:143–48
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Craik FIM. 1971. Primary memory. Br. Med. Bull. 27:232–36
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Craik FIM. 1977. Age differences in human memory. Handbook of the Psychology of Aging JE Birren, W Schaie 384–420 New York: Van Rostrand Reinhold
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Craik FIM. 1983. On the transfer of information from temporary to permanent memory. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 302:341–59
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Craik FIM. 1986. A functional account of age differences in memory. Human Memory and Cognitive Capabilities F Klix, H Hagendorf 409–22 Amsterdam: North-Holland
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Craik FIM. 2002a. Human memory and aging. Psychology at the Turn of the Millennium L Bäckman, C von Hofsten 261–80 Hove, UK: Psychol. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Craik FIM. 2002b. Levels of processing: past, present … and future?. Memory 10:305–18
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Craik FIM. 2006. Brain-behavior relations across the lifespan: a commentary. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 30:885–92
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Craik FIM, Bialystok E, Freedman M 2010. Delaying the onset of Alzheimer's disease: bilingualism as a form of cognitive reserve. Neurology 75:1726–29
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Craik FIM, Byrd M. 1982. Aging and cognitive deficits: the role of attentional resources. Aging and Cognitive Processes FIM Craik, SE Trehub 191–211 New York: Plenum
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Craik FIM, Eftekhari E, Bialystok E, Anderson ND 2018a. Individual differences in executive functions and retrieval efficacy. Psychol. Aging 33:1105–14
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Craik FIM, Eftekhari E, Binns MA 2018b. Effects of divided attention at encoding and retrieval: further data. Mem. Cogn. 46:1263–77
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Craik FIM, Govoni R, Naveh-Benjamin M, Anderson ND 1996. The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 125:159–80
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Craik FIM, Kester JD. 2000. Divided attention and memory: impairment of processing or consolidation?. Memory, Consciousness, and the Brain: The Tallinn Conference E Tulving 38–51 New York: Psychol. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Craik FIM, Levy BA. 1970. Semantic and acoustic information in primary memory. J. Exp. Psychol. 86:77–82
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Craik FIM, Lockhart RS. 1972. Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 11:671–84
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Craik FIM, Moroz TM, Moscovitch M, Stuss DT, Winocur GW et al. 1999. In search of the self: a positron emission tomography study. Psychol. Sci. 10:27–35
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Craik FIM, Rose NS. 2012. Memory encoding and aging: a neurocognitive perspective. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36:1729–39
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Craik FIM, Salthouse TA, eds. 1992. The Handbook of Aging and Cognition Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. , 1st ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Craik FIM, Salthouse TA, eds. 2000. The Handbook of Aging and Cognition Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. , 2nd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Craik FIM, Salthouse TA, eds. 2008. The Handbook of Aging and Cognition New York: Psychol. Press. , 3rd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Craik FIM, Tulving E. 1975. Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 104:268–94
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Craik FIM, Watkins MJ. 1973. The role of rehearsal in short-term memory. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 12:599–607
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Danker JF, Anderson JR. 2010. The ghosts of brain states past: Remembering reactivates the brain regions engaged during encoding. Psychol. Bull. 136:87–102
     [Google Scholar]
  56. D'Esposito M, Postle BR. 2015. The cognitive neuroscience of working memory. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 66:115–42
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Dudai Y. 2004. The neurobiology of consolidations, or, how stable is the engram. ? Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55:51–86
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Eichenbaum H. 2004. Hippocampus: cognitive processes and neural representations that underlie declarative memory. Neuron 44:109–20
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Einstein GO, McDaniel MA. 1990. Normal aging and prospective memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 16:717–26
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Engle RW. 2002. Working memory capacity as executive attention. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 11:19–23
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Fletcher PC, Shallice T, Dolan RJ 2000. “Sculpting the response space”—an account of left prefrontal activation at encoding. NeuroImage 12:404–17
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Fuster JM. 1995. Memory in the Cerebral Cortex Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Fuster JM. 2008. The Prefrontal Cortex New York: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Gardiner JM, Richardson-Klavehn A. 2000. Remembering and knowing. The Oxford Handbook of Memory E Tulving, FIM Craik 229–44 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Gathercole VC, Thomas EM, Kennedy I, Prys C, Young N et al. 2014. Does language dominance affect cognitive performance in bilinguals? Lifespan evidence from preschoolers through older adults on card sorting, Simon, and metalinguistic tasks. Front. Psychol. 5:11
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Gold BT, Kim C, Johnson NF, Kryscio RJ, Smith CD 2013. Lifelong bilingualism maintains neural efficiency for cognitive control in aging. J. Neurosci. 33:387–96
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Grady CL, McIntosh AR, Rajah MN, Beig S, Craik FIM 1999. The effects of age on the neural correlates of episodic memory. Cereb. Cortex 9:805–14
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Graf P, Mandler G. 1984. Activation makes words more accessible but not necessarily more retrievable. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 23:553–68
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Graf P, Schacter DL. 1985. Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 11:501–8
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Hasher L, Zacks RT. 1979. Automatic and effortful processes in memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 108:356–88
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Hasher L, Zacks RT. 1988. Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation GH Bower 193–225 New York: Academic
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Henry JD, MacLeod MS, Phillips LH, Crawford JR 2004. A meta-analytic review of prospective memory and aging. Psychol. Aging 19:27–39
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Hyde TS, Jenkins JJ. 1969. Differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a list of highly associated words. J. Exp. Psychol. 82:472–81
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Jacoby LL. 1983. Remembering the data: analyzing interactive processes in reading. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 22:485–508
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Jacoby LL. 1991. A process dissociation framework: separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. J. Mem. Lang. 30:513–41
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Jacoby LL, Dallas M. 1981. On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 110:306–40
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Jacoby LL, Witherspoon D. 1982. Remembering without awareness. Can. J. Psychol. 36:300–24
     [Google Scholar]
  78. James W. 1890. The Principles of Psychology London: Macmillan
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Jennings JM, Jacoby LL. 1993. Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: aging, attention, and control. Psychol. Aging 8:283–93
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Josselyn SA, Köhler S, Frankland PW 2015. Finding the engram. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16:521–34
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Josselyn SA, Köhler S, Frankland PW 2017. Heroes of the engram. J. Neurosci. 37:4647–57
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Kapur S, Craik FIM, Tulving E, Wilson AA, Houle S, Brown GM 1994. Neuroanatomical correlates of encoding in episodic memory: levels of processing effect. PNAS 91:2008–11
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Kolers PA. 1973. Remembering operations. Mem. Cogn. 1:347–55
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Kolers PA. 1979. A pattern-analyzing basis of recognition. Levels of Processing in Human Memory LS Cermak, FIM Craik 363–84 Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Kousaie S, Phillips NA. 2012. Conflict monitoring and resolution: Are two languages better than one? Evidence from reaction time and event-related brain potentials. Brain Res 1446:71–90
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Levy BA, Craik FIM. 1975. The co-ordination of codes in short-term retention. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 27:33–45
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Lockhart RS, Craik FIM. 1990. Levels of processing: a retrospective commentary on a framework for memory research. Can. J. Psychol. 44:87–112
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Luk G, Anderson JAE, Craik FIM, Grady C, Bialystok E 2010. Distinct neural correlates for two types of inhibition: response inhibition versus interference suppression. Brain Cogn 74:347–57
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Luk G, Bialystok E, Craik FIM, Grady CL 2011. Lifelong bilingualism maintains white matter integrity in older adults. J. Neurosci. 31:16808–13
     [Google Scholar]
  90. McDaniel MA, Einstein GO. 2011. The neuropsychology of prospective memory in normal aging: a componential approach. Neuropsychologia 49:2147–55
     [Google Scholar]
  91. McIntyre JS, Craik FIM. 1987. Age differences in memory for item and source information. Can. J. Psychol. 41:175–92
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Mechelli A, Crinion JT, Noppeney U, O'Doherty J, Ashburner J et al. 2004. Neurolinguistics: structural plasticity in the bilingual brain. Nature 431:757
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Miller GA. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 63:81–97
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Mishkin M, Suzuki WA, Gadian DG, Vargha-Khadem F 1997. Hierarchical organization of cognitive memory. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 352:1461–67
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Morris CD, Bransford JD, Franks JJ 1977. Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 16:519–33
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Moscovitch M, Craik FIM. 1976. Depth of processing, retrieval cues, and uniqueness of encoding as factors in recall. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 15:447–58
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Mulligan NW. 1998. The role of attention during encoding in implicit and explicit memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 24:27–47
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Nadel L, Moscovitch M. 1997. Memory consolidation, retrograde amnesia and the hippocampal complex. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 7:217–27
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Naveh-Benjamin M. 2000. Adult age differences in memory performance: tests of an associative deficit hypothesis. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 26:1170–87
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Neely JH. 1977. Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 106:226–54
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Nyberg L, Habib R, McIntosh AR, Tulving E 2000. Reactivation of encoding-related brain activity during memory retrieval. PNAS 97:11120–24
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Oberauer K. 2009. Design for a working memory. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. 51:45–100
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Paap KR, Greenberg ZI. 2013. There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cogn. Psychol. 66:232–58
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Petersen SE, Fox PT, Posner M, Mintun M, Raichle ME 1989. Positron emission tomography studies of the processing of single words. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1:153–70
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Poldrack RA, Wagner AD, Prull MW, Desmond JE, Glover GH, Gabrieli JDE 1999. Functional specialization for semantic and phonological processing in the left inferior frontal cortex. NeuroImage 10:15–35
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Postle BR. 2006. Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain. Neuroscience 139:23–38
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Postman L. 1964. Studies of learning to learn II. Changes in transfer as a function of practice. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 3:437–47
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Ratcliff R, Smith PL, Brown SD, McKoon G 2016. Diffusion decision model: current issues and history. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20:260–81
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Raz N. 2000. Aging of the brain and its impact on cognitive performance: integration of structural and functional findings. The Handbook of Aging and Cognition FIM Craik, TA Salthouse 1–90 Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. , 2nd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Salthouse TA. 1996. The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychol. Rev. 103:403–28
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Salvatierra JL, Rosselli M. 2011. The effect of bilingualism and age on inhibitory control. Int. J. Biling. 15:26–37
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Schacter DL. 1982. Stranger Behind the Engram: Theories of Memory and the Psychology of Science Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Schacter DL. 1987. Implicit memory: history and current status. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 13:501–18
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Schacter DL, Harbluk JL, McLachlan DR 1984. Retrieval without recollection: an experimental analysis of source amnesia. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 23:593–611
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Schroeder SR, Marian V. 2012. A bilingual advantage for episodic memory in older adults. J. Cogn. Psychol. 66:232–58
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Schweizer TA, Ware J, Fischer CE, Craik FIM, Bialystok E 2012. Bilingualism as a contributor to cognitive reserve: evidence from brain atrophy in Alzheimer's disease. Cortex 48:991–96
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Seamon JG, Virostek S. 1978. Memory performance and subject-defined depth of processing. Mem. Cogn. 6:283–87
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Spencer WD, Raz N. 1994. Memory for facts, source, and context: Can frontal-lobe dysfunction explain age-related differences?. Psychol. Aging 9:149–59
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Squire LR, Alvarez P. 1995. Retrograde amnesia and memory consolidation: a neurobiological perspective. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 5:169–77
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Treisman AM. 1960. Contextual cues in selective listening. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 12:24–28
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Treisman AM. 1964. Selective attention in man. Brit. Med. Bull. 20:12–16
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Tse CS, Altarriba J. 2014. The relationship between language proficiency and attentional control in Cantonese-English bilingual children: evidence from Simon, Simon switching, and working memory tasks. Front. Psychol. 5:954
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Tulving E. 1983. Elements of Episodic Memory New York: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Tulving E. 2001. Does memory encoding exist?. Perspectives on Human Memory and Cognitive Aging: Essays in Honour of Fergus Craik M Naveh-Benjamin, M Moscovitch, HL Roediger III 6–27 New York: Psychol. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Tulving E, Craik FIM, eds. 2000. The Oxford Handbook of Memory New York: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Tulving E, Kapur S, Craik FIM, Moscovitch M, Houle S 1994. Hemispheric encoding/retrieval asymmetry in episodic memory: positron emission tomography findings. PNAS 91:2016–20
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Tulving E, Schacter DL. 1990. Priming and human memory systems. Science 247:301–6
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Unsworth N, Engle RW. 2007. The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychol. Rev. 114:104–32
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Wheeler ME, Petersen SE, Buckner RL 2000. Memory's echo: Vivid remembering reactivates sensory-specific cortex. PNAS 97:11125–29
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Woumans E, Duyck W. 2015. The bilingual advantage debate: moving toward different methods for verifying its existence. Cortex 73:356–57
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Woumans E, Santens P, Sieben A, Versijpt J, Stevens M, Duyck W 2015. Bilingualism delays clinical manifestations of Alzheimer's disease. Biling. Lang. Cogn. 18:568–74
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-051027
Loading
Remembering: An Activity of Mind and Brain
Annual Review of Psychology 71, 1 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-051027
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-051027
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-051027
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error