1932

Abstract

Providing people with information about the behavior and attitudes of their peers is a strategy commonly employed by those seeking to reduce behavior deemed harmful either to individuals (e.g., high alcohol consumption) or the collective (e.g., high energy consumption). We review norm-based interventions, detailing the logic behind them and the various forms they can take. We give special attention to interventions designed to decrease college students' drinking and increase environment-friendly behaviors. We identify the conditions under which norm information has the highest likelihood of changing the targeted behavior and discuss why this is the case.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015013
2016-01-04
2024-05-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/psych/67/1/annurev-psych-010814-015013.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015013&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abrahamse W, Steg L. 2013. Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: a meta-analysis. Glob. Environ. Change 23:61773–85 [Google Scholar]
  2. Abrahamse W, Steg L, Vick C, Rothengatter T. 2005. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy consumption. J. Environ. Psychol. 25:273–91 [Google Scholar]
  3. Agostinelli G, Brown JM, Miller WR. 1995. Effects of normative feedback on consumption among heavy drinking college students. J. Drug Educ. 25:31–40 [Google Scholar]
  4. Alcott H. 2011. Social norms and energy conservation. J. Public Econ. 95:1082–95 [Google Scholar]
  5. Alcott H, Mullainathan S. 2010. Behavior and energy policy. Science 327:59701204–5 [Google Scholar]
  6. Alpizar F, Carlson F, Johansson-Stennman O. 2008. Anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity: evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica. J. Public Econ. 92:1047–60 [Google Scholar]
  7. Asch S. 1955. Opinions and social pressure. Sci. Am. 193:31–35 [Google Scholar]
  8. Ayres I, Raseman S, Shih A. 2013. Evidence from two large field experiments that peer comparison feedback can reduce residential energy usage. J. Law Econ. Org. 29992–1022
  9. Baer JS, Stacy A, Larimer M. 1991. Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students. J. Stud. Alcohol 52:580–86 [Google Scholar]
  10. Banyard VL, Moynihan MM, Plante EG. 2007. Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: an experimental evaluation. J. Community Psychol. 35:463–81 [Google Scholar]
  11. Barnett LA, Far JM, Maus AL, Miller JA. 1996. Changing perceptions of peer norms as a drinking reduction program for college students. J. Alcohol Drug Educ. 41:39–62 [Google Scholar]
  12. Barnett NP, Murphy JG, Colby SM, Monti PM. 2007. Efficacy and mediation of counselor versus computer-delivered interventions with mandated college students. Addict. Behav. 32:2529–48 [Google Scholar]
  13. Berkowitz AD. 2010. Fostering healthy norms to prevent violence and abuse: the social norms approach. The Prevention of Sexual Violence: A Practitioner's Sourcebook KL Kaufman 147–71 Holyoke, MA: NEARI Press [Google Scholar]
  14. Bewick BM, Trusler K, Mulhern B, Barkham M, Hill AJ. 2000. The feasibility and effectiveness of a web-based personalized feedback and social norms alcohol intervention in UK university students: a randomised control trial. Addict. Behav. 33:1192–98 [Google Scholar]
  15. Blane HT, Hewitt LC. 1977. Mass Media Public Education and Alcohol: A State-of-the-Art Review Rockville, MD: Natl. Inst. Alcohol Abuse Alcohol.
  16. Blanton H, Koblitz A, McCaul KD. 2008. Misperceptions about norm misperceptions: descriptive, injunctive, and affective “social norming” efforts to change behaviors. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 2/3:1379–99 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bolsen T. 2013. A light bulb goes on: norms, rhetoric, and actions for the public good. Polit. Behav. 35:11–20 [Google Scholar]
  18. Borsari B, Carey KB. 2000. Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 68:728–33 [Google Scholar]
  19. Borsari B, Carey KB. 2003. Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: a meta-analytic integration. J. Stud. Alcohol 64:331–41 [Google Scholar]
  20. Bowen AM, Bourgeois MJ. 2001. Attitudes towards lesbian, gay and bisexual college students: the contribution of pluralistic ignorance, dynamic social impact and contact theories. J. Am. Coll. Health 50:291–96 [Google Scholar]
  21. Bruce S. 2002. The “A Man” campaign: marketing social norms to men to prevent sexual assault. Rep. Soc. Norms: Work. Pap. #5 Little Falls, NJ: PaperClip Commun.
  22. Burchell K, Rettie R, Patel K. 2013. Marketing social norms: social marketing and the “social norms approach.”. J. Consum. Behav. 12:1–9 [Google Scholar]
  23. Carey KB, Carey MP, Maisto SA, Henson JM. 2006. Brief motivational interventions for heavy college drinkers: a randomized controlled trial. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 74:943–54 [Google Scholar]
  24. Carey KB, Henson JM, Carey MP, Maisto SA. 2010. Perceived norms mediate effects of brief motivational intervention for sanctioned college drinkers. Clin. Psychol. Sci. Pract. 17:58–71 [Google Scholar]
  25. Carlson AE. 2001. Recycling norms. Calif. Law Rev. 89:51231–300 [Google Scholar]
  26. Chan KK, Neighbors C, Gilson M, Larimer ME, Marlatt GD. 2007. Epidemiological trends in drinking by age and gender: providing normative feedback to adults. Addict. Behav. 32:967–76 [Google Scholar]
  27. Cho H. 2006. Influences of norm proximity and norm types on binge and non-binge drinkers: examining the under-examined aspects of social norms interventions on college campuses. J. Subst. Abuse 11:417–29 [Google Scholar]
  28. Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ. 2004. Social influence: compliance and conformity. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55:591–621 [Google Scholar]
  29. Cialdini RB, Reno RR, Kallgren CA. 1990. A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 58:1015–26 [Google Scholar]
  30. Clapp JD, Lange JE, Russell C, Shillington A, Voas RB. 2003. A failed norms social marketing campaign. J. Stud. Alcohol 64:409–14 [Google Scholar]
  31. Collins SR, Carey KB, Sliwinski MJ. 2002. Mailed personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for at-risk college drinkers. J. Stud. Alcohol 63:559–67 [Google Scholar]
  32. Crawford LA, Novak KB. 2010. Reactivity to conspicuousness and alcohol use among college students: the moderating effect of expectancies. Addict. Behav. 29:1845–49 [Google Scholar]
  33. De Groot JIM, Abrahamse W, Jones K. 2013. Persuasive normative messages: the influence of injunctive and personal norms on using free plastic bags. Sustainability 5:1829–44 [Google Scholar]
  34. DeJong W, Schneider SK, Towvim LG, Murthpy MJ, Doer EE. et al. 2006. A multisite randomized trial of social norms marketing campaigns to reduce college student drinking. J. Stud. Alcohol 67:868–79 [Google Scholar]
  35. DeJong W, Schneider SK, Towvim LG, Murthpy MJ, Doer EE. et al. 2009. A multisite randomized trial of social norms marketing campaigns to reduce college student drinking: a replication failure. Subst. Abuse 30:127–40 [Google Scholar]
  36. Delmas M, Lessem N. 2014. Saving power to conserve your reputations? The effectiveness of private versus public information. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 67:3353–67 [Google Scholar]
  37. Deutsch M, Gerard HB. 1955. A study of normative and informational social influence upon individual judgment. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 51:629–36 [Google Scholar]
  38. Dolan P, Metcalfe R. 2012. Better Neighbors and Basic Knowledge: A Field Experiment on the Role of Non-Pecuniary Incentives on Energy Consumption Oxford, UK: Dep. Econ., Oxford Univ.
  39. Doumas DM, McKinley LL, Book P. 2009. Evaluation of two web-based alcohol interventions for mandated students. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 36:65–74 [Google Scholar]
  40. Epsey JA, Epsey M. 2004. Turning on the lights: a meta-analysis of residential electricity demand elasticities. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 36:165–81 [Google Scholar]
  41. Fabiano PM, Perkins WH, Berkowitz A, Lickenbach J, Stark C. 2003. Engaging men as social justice allies in ending violence against women: evidence for a social norms approach. J. Am. Coll. Health 52:105–12 [Google Scholar]
  42. Far J, Miller J. 2003. The small group norms challenging model: social norms interventions with targeted high risk groups. The Social Norms Approach to Presenting School and College Age Substance Abuse: A Handbook for Educators, Counselors, and Clinicians HW Perkins 111–32 San Francisco: Jossey-Bass [Google Scholar]
  43. Ferraro PJ, Miranda JJ, Price M. 2012. Persistence of treatment effects with norm-based policy instruments: evidence from a randomized environmental policy experiment. Am. Econ. Rev.: Papers Proc. 101:3318–22 [Google Scholar]
  44. Ferraro PJ, Price MK. 2013. Using non-pecuniary strategies to influence behavior: evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Rev. Econ. Stat. 95:164–73 [Google Scholar]
  45. Fischer C. 2008. Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy?. Energy Effic. 1:429–34 [Google Scholar]
  46. Frey BS, Meier S. 2004. Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: testing “conditional cooperation” in a field experiment. Am. Econ. Rev. 94:1717–22 [Google Scholar]
  47. Gidycz C, Orchowski L, Berkowitz AD. 2011. Preventing sexual aggression among college men: an evaluation of a social norms and bystander intervention program. Violence Against Women 17:6720–42 [Google Scholar]
  48. Glider P, Midyett SJ, Mills-Nova B, Johannessen K, Collins C. 2001. Challenging the collegiate rite of passage: a campus-wide social marketing media campaign to reduce binge drinking. J. Drug Educ. 31:207–20 [Google Scholar]
  49. Göckeritz S, Schultz PW, Rednon T, Cialsinia RB, Goldtein NJ, Griskevicius V. 2010. Descriptive normative beliefs and conservation behavior: the moderating role of personal involvement and injunctive normative beliefs. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 40:514–23 [Google Scholar]
  50. Goldstein N, Cialdini RB, Griskevicius V. 2008. A room with a viewpoint: using norm-based appeals to motivate conservation behaviors in a hotel setting. J. Consum. Res. 35:472–82 [Google Scholar]
  51. Gomberg L, Schneider SK, DeJong W. 2001. Evaluation of a social norms marketing campaign to reduce high-risk drinking at the University of Mississippi. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 27:375–89 [Google Scholar]
  52. Granfield R. 2002. Can you believe it? Assessing the credibility of a social norms campaign Rep. Soc. Norms: Work. Pap. #2 Little Falls, NJ: PaperClip Commun.
  53. Haines M, Spear SF. 1996. Changing the perception of the norm: a strategy to decrease binge drinking among college students. J. Am. Coll. Health 45:134–40 [Google Scholar]
  54. Hansen B, Graham JW. 1991. Preventing alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use among adolescents: peer pressure resistance training versus establishing conservative norms. Prev. Med. 20:414–30 [Google Scholar]
  55. Harries T, Rettig R, Studley M, Chambers S. 2013. Is social norms marketing effective? A case study in domestic electricity consumption. Eur. J. Mark. 47:1458–75 [Google Scholar]
  56. Iyer M, Kempton M, Payne C. 2006. Comparison groups on bills: automated personalized energy information. Energy Build. 38:988–96 [Google Scholar]
  57. Jacobson RP, Mortensen CR, Cialdini RB. 2011. Bodies obliged and unbound: differentiated response tendencies for injunctive and descriptive social norms. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 100:433–48 [Google Scholar]
  58. Johnson MB. 2012. Experimental test of social norms theory in a real-world drinking environment. J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs 73:5851–59 [Google Scholar]
  59. Kahan DM. 1997. Social influence, social meaning, and deterrence. Va. Law Rev. 83:349–95 [Google Scholar]
  60. Katzev R, Johnson T. 1987. Promoting Energy Conservation: An Analysis of Behavioral Research Boulder, CO: Westview
  61. Kenney SR, LaBrie JW, Lac A. 2013. Injunctive peer misperceptions and the mediation of self-approval on risk for driving after drinking among college students. J. Health Commun. 18:4459–77 [Google Scholar]
  62. LaBrie JW, Hummer JF, Neighbors C, Pederson ER. 2008. Live interactive group-specific normative feedback reduces misperception and drinking in college students: a randomized cluster trial. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 22:141–48 [Google Scholar]
  63. LaBrie JW, Lewis MA, Atkins DC, Neighbors C, Zheng C. et al. 2013. RCT of web-based personalized normative feedback for college drinking prevention: Are typical student norms good enough?. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 81:61074–86 [Google Scholar]
  64. Larimer ME, Lee CM, Kilmer JR, Fabiano PM, Stark CB. et al. 2007. Personalized mailed feedback for drinking prevention among college students: one year outcomes from a randomized clinical trial. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 75:285–93 [Google Scholar]
  65. Lee CM, Geisner IM, Lewis MA, Neighbors C, Larimer ME. 2007. Social motives and the interaction between descriptive and injunctive norms in college student drinking. J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs 68:714–21 [Google Scholar]
  66. Lewin K. 1943. Defining the “field at a given time.”. Psychol. Rev. 50:290–310 [Google Scholar]
  67. Lewis MA, Neighbors C. 2004. Gender-specific misperceptions of college drinking norms. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 18:334–39 [Google Scholar]
  68. Lewis MA, Neighbors C. 2006a. Social norms approaches using descriptive drinking norms education: a review of the research on personalized normative feedback. J. Am. Coll. Health 54:213–18 [Google Scholar]
  69. Lewis MA, Neighbors C. 2006b. Who is the typical college student? Implications for personalized normative feedback interventions. Addict. Behav. 31:2120–26 [Google Scholar]
  70. Lewis MA, Neighbors C. 2007. Optimizing personalized normative feedback: the use of gender-specific referents. J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs 68:228–37 [Google Scholar]
  71. Linkenbach J, Perkins HW. 2003. Most of us wear seatbelts: the process and outcomes of a 3-year statewide adult seatbelt campaign in Montana. Presented at Natl. Conf. Soc. Norms Model, July 17, Boston, MA
  72. Loh C, Gidycz CA, Lobo TR, Luthra R. 2005. A prospective analysis of sexual assault perpetration: Risk factors related to perpetrator characteristics. J. Interpers. Violence 20:1325–48 [Google Scholar]
  73. Loock CM, Landwehr J, Staake T, Fleisch E, Pentland A. 2012. The influence of reference frame and population density on the effectiveness of social normative feedback on electricity consumption. ICIS 2012 Conf. Proc. http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2012/proceedings/GreenIS/7/
  74. Lynch J, Mowrey R, Nesbitt G, O'Neill D. 2004. Risky business: misperceived norms of sexual behavior among college students. NASPA J. 42:121–35 [Google Scholar]
  75. Mattern JL, Neighbors C. 2004. Social norms campaigns: examining the relationship between changes in perceived norms and changes in drinking levels. J. Stud. Alcohol 65:489–93 [Google Scholar]
  76. McAdams RH. 1997. The origin, development, and regulation of norms. Mich. Law Rev. 96:338–443 [Google Scholar]
  77. McKenzie-Mohr D, Lee D, Schultz PW, Kotler P. 2012. Social Marketing to Protect the Environment: What Works Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  78. Miller DT, Monin B, Prentice DA. 2000. Pluralistic ignorance and inconsistency between private attitudes and public behaviors. Attitudes, Behavior, and Social Context: The Role of Norms and Group Membership DJ Terry, MA Hogg 95–113 Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
  79. Miller DT, Prentice DA. 1996. The construction of social norms and standards. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles ET Higgins, AW Kruglanski 799–829 New York: Guilford [Google Scholar]
  80. Miller MB, Leffingwell T, Claborn K, Meier E, Walters S, Neighbors C. 2013. Personalized feedback intervention for alcohol misuse: an update of Walters & Neighbors (2005). Psychol. Addict. Behav. 27:909–20 [Google Scholar]
  81. Mollen S, Rimal RN, Ruiter RAC, Jang SA, Kok G. 2013. Intervening or interfering? The influence of injunctive and descriptive norms on intervention behaviors in alcohol consumption contexts. Psychol. Health 28:561–78 [Google Scholar]
  82. Moreira MT, Smith LA, Foxcroft D. 2010. Social norms interventions to reduce alcohol misuse in university or college students. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 3:CD006748 [Google Scholar]
  83. Neighbors C, Dillard AJ, Lewis MA, Bergstrom RL, Neil TA. 2006. Normative misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms and temporal precedence of perceived norms and drinking. J. Stud. Alcohol 67:290–99 [Google Scholar]
  84. Neighbors C, Jensen M, Tidwell J, Walter T, Fossos N, Lewis MA. 2011. Social-norms interventions for light and nondrinking students. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 14:651–69 [Google Scholar]
  85. Neighbors C, Larimer ME, Lewis MA. 2004. Targeting misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms: efficacy of a computer-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 72:434–47 [Google Scholar]
  86. Nolan JM. 2011. The cognitive ripple of social norms communications. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 14:689–702 [Google Scholar]
  87. Nolan JM, Schultz PW, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V. 2008. Normative social influence is under-detected. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34:913–23 [Google Scholar]
  88. O'Grady MA, Cullum J, Tennen H, Armell S. 2011. Daily relationship between event-specific drinking norms and alcohol use: a four-year longitudinal study. J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs 72633–41
  89. Paluck EL, Ball L. 2010. Social Norms Marketing Aimed at Gender-Based Violence: A Literature Review and Critical Assessment New York: Intl. Rescue Comm.
  90. Patrick ME, Lee CM, Neighbors C. 2014. Web-based intervention to change perceived norms of college student alcohol use and sexual behavior on spring break. Addict. Behav. 39:3600–6 [Google Scholar]
  91. Perkins HW. 2003. The emergence and evolution of the social norms approach to substance abuse prevention. The Social Norms Approach to Preventing School and College Age Substance Abuse: A Handbook for Educators, Counselors, and Clinicians HW Perkins 3–17 San Francisco: Jossey-Bass [Google Scholar]
  92. Perkins HW. 2014. Misperception is reality: the “reign of error” about peer risk behavior norms among youth and young adults. The Complexity of Social Norms, Computational Social Sciences M Xenitidou, B Edmonds 11–35 Berlin: Springer-Verlag [Google Scholar]
  93. Perkins HW, Craig DW, Perkins JM. 2011. Using social norms to reduce bullying: a research intervention among adolescents in five middle schools. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 14:5703–22 [Google Scholar]
  94. Perkins HW, Linkenbach JW, Lewis MA, Neighbors C. 2010. Effectiveness of social norms media marketing in reducing drinking and driving: a statewide campaign. Addict. Behav. 35:866–74 [Google Scholar]
  95. Prentice DA. 2008. Mobilizing and weakening peer influence as mechanisms for changing behavior: implications for alcohol intervention programs. Understanding Peer Influence in Children and Adolescents MJD Prinstein, KA Dodge 161–80 New York: Guilford [Google Scholar]
  96. Prentice DA, Miller DT. 1993. Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 64:243–56 [Google Scholar]
  97. Prince MA, Carey KB. 2010. The malleability of injunctive norms among college students. Addict. Behav. 35:940–47 [Google Scholar]
  98. Reid AE, Aiken LS. 2013. Correcting injunctive norms misperception motivates behavior change: a randomized controlled sun protection intervention. Health Psychol. 32:5551–60 [Google Scholar]
  99. Reilly DW, Wood DM. 2008. A randomized test of small-group interactive social norms interventions. J. Am. Coll. Health 57:153–60 [Google Scholar]
  100. Sandstrom M, Makover H, Bartini M. 2013. Social context of bullying: Do misperceptions of group norms influence children's responses to witnessed episodes?. Soc. Influ. 8:2–3196–215 [Google Scholar]
  101. Schroeder CM, Prentice DA. 1998. Exploring pluralistic ignorance to reduce alcohol use among college students. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 28:2150–80 [Google Scholar]
  102. Schultz PW. 1999. Changing behavior with normative feedback interventions: a field experiment on curbside recycling. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 21:25–36 [Google Scholar]
  103. Schultz PW, Khazian A, Zaleski A. 2008. Using normative social influence to promote conservation among hotel guests. Soc. Influ. 3:14–23 [Google Scholar]
  104. Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V. 2007. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol. Sci. 18:429–34 [Google Scholar]
  105. Shang J, Crosson R. 2009. Field experiments in charitable contribution: the impact of social influence on the voluntary provision of public goods. Econ. J. 119:1422–79 [Google Scholar]
  106. Sherif M. 1937. An experimental approach to the study of attitudes. Sociometry 1:90–98 [Google Scholar]
  107. Smith JR, Louis WR. 2008. Do as we say and as we do: the interplay of descriptive and injunctive group norms in the attitude-behavior relationship. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 47:647–66 [Google Scholar]
  108. Smith JR, Louis WR, Terry DJ, Greenaway KH, Clarke MR, Cheng X. 2012. Congruent or conflicted? The impact of injunctive and descriptive norms on environmental intentions. J. Environ. Psychol. 32:353–61 [Google Scholar]
  109. Stamper GA, Smith BH, Grant R, Bogle KE. 2004. Replicated findings of an evaluation of a brief intervention designed to prevent high-risk drinking among first-year college students: implications for social norming theory. J. Alcohol Drug Educ. 4:53–72 [Google Scholar]
  110. Steffian S. 1999. Correction of normative misperceptions: an alcohol abuse prevention program. J. Drug Educ. 29:115–38 [Google Scholar]
  111. Stein J. 2007. Peer educators and close friends as predictors of male college students' willingness to prevent rape. J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 48:78–79 [Google Scholar]
  112. Stern P. 1999. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J. Soc. Issues 56:3407–24 [Google Scholar]
  113. Strahilevitz L. 2003. Social norms from close-knit groups to loose-knit groups. Univ. Chic. Law Rev. 70:359–72 [Google Scholar]
  114. Suls J, Green P. 2003. Pluralistic ignorance and college student perceptions of gender-specific alcohol norms. Health Psychol. 22:479–86 [Google Scholar]
  115. Thombs DL, Hamilton MJ. 2002. Effects of a social norm feedback campaign on the drinking norms and behavior of Division 1 student-athletes. J. Drug Educ. 32:227–44 [Google Scholar]
  116. Thombs DL, Ray-Tomasek J, Osborn CJ, Olds RS. 2005. The role of sex-specific normative beliefs in undergraduate alcohol use. Am. J. Health Behav. 29:342–51 [Google Scholar]
  117. Turner J, Perkins HW, Bauerle J. 2008. Declining negative consequence related to alcohol misuse among students exposed to a social norms marketing intervention on a college campus. J. Am. Coll. Health 57:85–94 [Google Scholar]
  118. Van der Linden S. 2013. Exploring beliefs about bottled water and intentions to reduce consumption: the dual effect of social norm activation and persuasive information. Environ. Behav. 20:1–25 [Google Scholar]
  119. Vandenbergh MP. 2005. Order without social norms: how personal norm activation can protect the environment. Northwest. Univ. Law Rev. 99:31101–66 [Google Scholar]
  120. Walters ST, Bennett ME, Miller JH. 2000. Reducing alcohol use in college students: a controlled trial of two brief interventions. J. Drug Educ. 30:361–72 [Google Scholar]
  121. Walters ST, Neighbors C. 2005. Feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: what, why and for whom?. Addict. Behav. 30:1168–82 [Google Scholar]
  122. Wechsler H, Nelson TF, Lee JE, Seibring M, Lewis C, Kelling RP. 2003. Perception and reality: a national evaluation of social norms marketing interventions to reduce college students' heavy alcohol use. J. Stud. Alcohol 64:484–94 [Google Scholar]
  123. Werch CB, Pappas DM, Carlson JM, DiClemente CC, Chally PS, Sinder JA. 2000. Results of a social norm intervention to prevent binge drinking among first year residential college students. J. Am. Coll. Health 49:85–92 [Google Scholar]
  124. Young RM. 2013. Variations on the normative feedback model for energy efficient behavior in the context of military family housing. PhD thesis, Univ. Md. http://hdl.handle.net/1903/14272 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015013
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error