1932

Abstract

Determining the psychological, computational, and neural bases of confidence and uncertainty holds promise for understanding foundational aspects of human metacognition. While a neuroscience of confidence has focused on the mechanisms underpinning subpersonal phenomena such as representations of uncertainty in the visual or motor system, metacognition research has been concerned with personal-level beliefs and knowledge about self-performance. I provide a road map for bridging this divide by focusing on a particular class of confidence computation: propositional confidence in one's own (hypothetical) decisions or actions. Propositional confidence is informed by the observer's models of the world and their cognitive system, which may be more or less accurate—thus explaining why metacognitive judgments are inferential and sometimes diverge from task performance. Disparate findings on the neural basis of uncertainty and performance monitoring are integrated into a common framework, and a new understanding of the locus of action of metacognitive interventions is developed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-022423-032425
2024-01-18
2024-05-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/psych/75/1/annurev-psych-022423-032425.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-022423-032425&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Ackerman R, Thompson VA. 2017. Meta-reasoning: monitoring and control of thinking and reasoning. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21:8607–17
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Adler WT, Ma WJ. 2018. Comparing Bayesian and non-Bayesian accounts of human confidence reports. PLOS Comput. Biol. 14:11e1006572
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aguilar-Lleyda D, de Gardelle V. 2021. Confidence guides priority between forthcoming tasks. Sci. Rep. 11:118320
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ais J, Zylberberg A, Barttfeld P, Sigman M. 2016. Individual consistency in the accuracy and distribution of confidence judgments. Cognition 146:377–86
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Aitchison L, Bang D, Bahrami B, Latham PE. 2015. Doubly Bayesian analysis of confidence in perceptual decision-making. PLOS Comput. Biol. 11:10e1004519
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Allen M, Frank D, Schwarzkopf DS, Fardo F, Winston JS et al. 2016. Unexpected arousal modulates the influence of sensory noise on confidence. eLife 5:403
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Allen M, Glen JC, Müllensiefen D, Schwarzkopf DS, Fardo F et al. 2017. Metacognitive ability correlates with hippocampal and prefrontal microstructure. NeuroImage 149:415–23
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Alter AL, Oppenheimer DM. 2009. Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 13:3219–35
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Baars BJ. 1993. A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  10. Bahrami B, Olsen K, Latham PE, Roepstorff A, Rees G, Frith CD. 2010. Optimally interacting minds. Science 329:59951081–85
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Baird B, Cieslak M, Smallwood J, Grafton ST, Schooler JW. 2015. Regional white matter variation associated with domain-specific metacognitive accuracy. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 27:3440–52
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Baird B, Mrazek MD, Phillips DT, Schooler JW. 2014. Domain-specific enhancement of metacognitive ability following meditation training. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 143:51972–79
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Baird B, Smallwood J, Gorgolewski KJ, Margulies DS. 2013. Medial and lateral networks in anterior prefrontal cortex support metacognitive ability for memory and perception. J. Neurosci. 33:4216657–65
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Balsdon T, Wyart V, Mamassian P. 2020. Confidence controls perceptual evidence accumulation. Nat. Commun. 11:11753
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bang D, Aitchison L, Moran R, Herce Castanon S, Rafiee B et al. 2017. Confidence matching in group decision-making. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1:61–7
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bang D, Ershadmanesh S, Nili H, Fleming SM. 2020. Private–public mappings in human prefrontal cortex. eLife 9:e56477
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Bang D, Fleming SM. 2018. Distinct encoding of decision confidence in human medial prefrontal cortex. PNAS 115:236082–87
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bang D, Moran R, Daw ND, Fleming SM. 2022. Neurocomputational mechanisms of confidence in self and others. Nat. Commun. 13:14238
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Boldt A, de Gardelle V, Yeung N. 2017. The impact of evidence reliability on sensitivity and bias in decision confidence. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 43:81520–31
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Boldt A, Schiffer AM, Waszak F, Yeung N. 2019. Confidence predictions affect performance confidence and neural preparation in perceptual decision making. Sci. Rep. 9:14031
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Boldt A, Yeung N. 2015. Shared neural markers of decision confidence and error detection. J. Neurosci. 35:83478–84
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Boundy-Singer ZM, Ziemba CM, Goris RLT. 2023. Confidence reflects a noisy decision reliability estimate. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7:1142–54
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Busey TA, Tunnicliff J, Loftus GR, Loftus EF. 2000. Accounts of the confidence-accuracy relation in recognition memory. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 7:126–48
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Carpenter J, Sherman MT, Kievit RA, Seth AK, Lau H, Fleming SM. 2019. Domain-general enhancements of metacognitive ability through adaptive training. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 148:151–64
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Carruthers P. 2009. How we know our own minds: the relationship between mindreading and metacognition. Behav. Brain Sci. 32:2121–38
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Carruthers P, Williams DM. 2022. Model-free metacognition. Cognition 225:105117
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Caziot B, Mamassian P. 2021. Perceptual confidence judgments reflect self-consistency. J. Vis. 21:128
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Charles L, Van Opstal F, Marti S, Dehaene S. 2013. Distinct brain mechanisms for conscious versus subliminal error detection. NeuroImage 73:80–94
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Cortese A, Amano K, Koizumi A, Kawato M, Lau HC. 2016. Multivoxel neurofeedback selectively modulates confidence without changing perceptual performance. Nat. Commun. 7:13669
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Dayan P. 2022. Metacognitive information theory. PsyArXiv, Sept. 18. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/azujr
  31. de Gardelle V, Le Corre F, Mamassian P 2016. Confidence as a common currency between vision and audition. PLOS ONE 11:1e0147901
    [Google Scholar]
  32. de Gardelle V, Mamassian P. 2014. Does confidence use a common currency across two visual tasks?. Psychol. Sci. 11:1e0147901
    [Google Scholar]
  33. De Martino B, Fleming SM, Garrett N, Dolan RJ. 2013. Confidence in value-based choice. Nat. Neurosci. 16:1105–10
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Dehaene S, Lau HC, Kouider S. 2017. What is consciousness, and could machines have it?. Science 358:6362486–92
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Denison RN, Adler WT, Carrasco M, Ma WJ. 2018. Humans incorporate attention-dependent uncertainty into perceptual decisions and confidence. PNAS 115:4311090–95
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Desender K, Ridderinkhof KR, Murphy PR. 2021. Understanding neural signals of post-decisional performance monitoring: an integrative review. eLife 10:e67556
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Desender K, Vermeylen L, Verguts T. 2022. Dynamic influences on static measures of metacognition. Nat. Commun. 13:14208
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Ernst MO, Banks MS. 2002. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415:6870429–33
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Faivre N, Filevich E, Solovey G, Kühn S, Blanke O. 2018. Behavioral, modeling, and electrophysiological evidence for supramodality in human metacognition. J. Neurosci. 38:2263–77
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Fiacconi CM, Peter EL, Owais S, Köhler S. 2016. Knowing by heart: Visceral feedback shapes recognition memory judgments. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 145:5559–72
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Fischer H, Amelung D, Said N. 2019. The accuracy of German citizens' confidence in their climate change knowledge. Nat. Climate Change 9:10776–80
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Fiser J, Berkes P, Orbán G, Lengyel M. 2010. Statistically optimal perception and learning: from behavior to neural representations. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14:3119–30
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Flavell JH. 1979. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. Am. Psychol. 34:10906–11
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Fleming SM, Daw ND. 2017. Self-evaluation of decision-making: a general Bayesian framework for metacognitive computation. Psychol. Rev. 124:191–114
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Fleming SM, Dolan RJ. 2012. The neural basis of metacognitive ability. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 367:15941338–49
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Fleming SM, Huijgen J, Dolan RJ. 2012. Prefrontal contributions to metacognition in perceptual decision making. J. Neurosci. 32:186117–25
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Fleming SM, Lau HC. 2014. How to measure metacognition. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:443
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Fleming SM, Maniscalco B, Ko Y, Amendi N, Ro T, Lau HC. 2015. Action-specific disruption of perceptual confidence. Psychol. Sci. 26:189–98
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Fleming SM, Ryu J, Golfinos JG, Blackmon KE. 2014. Domain-specific impairment in metacognitive accuracy following anterior prefrontal lesions. Brain 137:Pt. 102811–22
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Fleming SM, van der Putten EJ, Daw ND. 2018. Neural mediators of changes of mind about perceptual decisions. Nat. Neurosci. 21:4617–24
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Fleming SM, Weil RS, Nagy Z, Dolan RJ, Rees G. 2010. Relating introspective accuracy to individual differences in brain structure. Science 329:59981541–43
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Fu Z, Beam D, Chung JM, Reed CM, Mamelak AN et al. 2022. The geometry of domain-general performance monitoring in the human medial frontal cortex. Science 376:6593eabm9922
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Gallagher RM, Suddendorf T, Arnold DH. 2019. Confidence as a diagnostic tool for perceptual aftereffects. Sci. Rep. 9:17124
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Geurts LS, Cooke JRH, van Bergen RS, Jehee JFM. 2022. Subjective confidence reflects representation of Bayesian probability in cortex. Nat. Hum. Behav. 6:2294–305
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Gherman S, Philiastides M. 2018. Human VMPFC encodes early signatures of confidence in perceptual decisions. eLife 7:e38293
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Goupil L, Kouider S. 2016. Behavioral and neural indices of metacognitive sensitivity in preverbal infants. Curr. Biol. 26:223038–45
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Guggenmos M. 2021. Measuring metacognitive performance: type 1 performance dependence and test-retest reliability. Neurosci. Conscious. 2021:1niab040
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Guggenmos M. 2022. Reverse engineering of metacognition. eLife 11:e75420
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Guggenmos M, Wilbertz G, Hebart MN, Sterzer P. 2016. Mesolimbic confidence signals guide perceptual learning in the absence of external feedback. eLife 5:345
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Hauser TU, Allen M, Purg N, Moutoussis M, Rees G, Dolan RJ. 2017. Noradrenaline blockade specifically enhances metacognitive performance. eLife 6:468
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Hertz U, Palminteri S, Brunetti S, Olesen C, Frith CD, Bahrami B. 2017. Neural computations underpinning the strategic management of influence in advice giving. Nat. Commun. 8:11–12
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Heyes C, Bang D, Shea N, Frith CD, Fleming SM. 2020. Knowing ourselves together: the cultural origins of metacognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 24:5349–62
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Hoven M, Lebreton M, Engelmann JB, Denys D, Luigjes J, van Holst RJ. 2019. Abnormalities of confidence in psychiatry: an overview and future perspectives. Transl. Psychiatry 9:11–18
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Hu X, Liu Z, Li T, Luo L. 2015. Influence of cue word perceptual information on metamemory accuracy in judgement of learning. Memory 24:3383–98
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Hu X, Zheng J, Su N, Fan T, Yang C et al. 2021. A Bayesian inference model for metamemory. Psychol. Rev. 128:5824–55
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Jiang S, Wang S, Wan X. 2022. Metacognition and mentalizing are associated with distinct neural representations of decision uncertainty. PLOS Biol. 20:5e3001301
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Kepecs A, Mainen ZF. 2012. A computational framework for the study of confidence in humans and animals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 367:15941322–37
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Kepecs A, Uchida N, Zariwala H, Mainen Z. 2008. Neural correlates, computation and behavioural impact of decision confidence. Nature 455:7210227–31
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Kersten D, Mamassian P, Yuille A. 2004. Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55:271–304
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Khalvati K, Kiani R, Rao RPN. 2021. Bayesian inference with incomplete knowledge explains perceptual confidence and its deviations from accuracy. Nat. Commun. 12:15704
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Kiani R, Corthell L, Shadlen MN. 2014. Choice certainty is informed by both evidence and decision time. Neuron 84:61329–42
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Kiani R, Shadlen MN. 2009. Representation of confidence associated with a decision by neurons in the parietal cortex. Science 324:5928759–64
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Kitayama S, Markus HR, Matsumoto H, Norasakkunkit V. 1997. Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 72:61245–67
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Koriat A. 1993. How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychol. Rev. 100:4609–39
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Koriat A. 2012. The self-consistency model of subjective confidence. Psychol. Rev. 119:180–113
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Kwok SC, Cai Y, Buckley MJ. 2019. Mnemonic introspection in macaques is dependent on superior dorsolateral prefrontal cortex but not orbitofrontal cortex. J. Neurosci. 39:305922–34
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Lak A, Costa GM, Romberg E, Koulakov AA, Mainen ZF, Kepecs A. 2014. Orbitofrontal cortex is required for optimal waiting based on decision confidence. Neuron 84:1190–201
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Lak A, Nomoto K, Keramati M, Sakagami M, Kepecs A. 2017. Midbrain dopamine neurons signal belief in choice accuracy during a perceptual decision. Curr. Biol. 27:6821–32
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Lebreton M, Abitbol R, Daunizeau J, Pessiglione M. 2015. Automatic integration of confidence in the brain valuation signal. Nat. Neurosci. 18:81159–67
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Lee ALF, de Gardelle V, Mamassian P. 2021. Global visual confidence. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 28:41233–42
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Li HH, Sprague TC, Yoo AH, Ma WJ, Curtis CE. 2021. Joint representation of working memory and uncertainty in human cortex. Neuron 109:223699–712.e6
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Logan GD, Crump MJC. 2010. Cognitive illusions of authorship reveal hierarchical error detection in skilled typists. Science 330:6004683–86
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Ma W, Beck J, Latham P, Pouget A. 2006. Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes. Nat. Neurosci. 9:111432–38
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Mamassian P, de Gardelle V. 2022. Modeling perceptual confidence and the confidence forced-choice paradigm. Psychol. Rev. 129:5976–98
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Maniscalco B, Lau HC. 2012. A signal detection theoretic approach for estimating metacognitive sensitivity from confidence ratings. Conscious. Cogn. 21:1422–30
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Maniscalco B, Odegaard B, Grimaldi P, Cho SH, Basso MA et al. 2021. Tuned inhibition in perceptual decision-making circuits can explain seemingly suboptimal confidence behavior. PLOS Comput. Biol. 17:3e1008779
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Marcke HV, Denmat PL, Verguts T, Desender K. 2022. Manipulating prior beliefs causally induces under- and overconfidence. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.01.482511
  88. Masset P, Ott T, Lak A, Hirokawa J, Kepecs A. 2020. Behavior- and modality-general representation of confidence in orbitofrontal cortex. Cell 182:1112–26.e18
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Mazancieux A, Fleming SM, Souchay C, Moulin CJA. 2020. Is there a G factor for metacognition? Correlations in retrospective metacognitive sensitivity across tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 149:91788–99
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Mazor M, Maimon-Mor RO, Charles L, Fleming SM 2023. Paradoxical evidence weighting in confidence judgments for detection and discrimination. Attent. Percept. Psychophys 85:2356–85
    [Google Scholar]
  91. McCurdy LY, Maniscalco B, Metcalfe J, Liu KY, de Lange FP, Lau HC. 2013. Anatomical coupling between distinct metacognitive systems for memory and visual perception. J. Neurosci. 33:51897–906
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Metcalfe J, Shimamura AP, eds. 1994. Metacognition: Knowing About Knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  93. Meyniel F, Sigman M, Mainen ZF. 2015. Confidence as Bayesian probability: from neural origins to behavior. Neuron 88:178–92
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Middlebrooks PG, Sommer MA. 2012. Neuronal correlates of metacognition in primate frontal cortex. Neuron 75:3517–30
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Miller EK, Cohen JD. 2001. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24:167–202
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Miyamoto K, Osada T, Setsuie R, Takeda M, Tamura K et al. 2017. Causal neural network of metamemory for retrospection in primates. Science 355:6321188–93
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Miyamoto K, Setsuie R, Osada T, Miyashita Y. 2018. Reversible silencing of the frontopolar cortex selectively impairs metacognitive judgment on non-experience in primates. Neuron 97:4980–89.e6
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Miyoshi K, Lau H. 2020. A decision-congruent heuristic gives superior metacognitive sensitivity under realistic variance assumptions. Psychol. Rev. 127:5655–71
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Morales J, Lau H, Fleming SM. 2018. Domain-general and domain-specific patterns of activity supporting metacognition in human prefrontal cortex. J. Neurosci. 38:143534–46
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Morrison J. 2016. Perceptual confidence. Anal. Philos. 57:115–48
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Murphy PR, Robertson IH, Harty S, O'Connell RG. 2015. Neural evidence accumulation persists after choice to inform metacognitive judgments. eLife 4:3478
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Nelson TO, Narens L. 1990. Metamemory: a theoretical framework and new findings. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. Adv. Res. Theory 26:125–73
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Nicholson T, Williams DM, Lind SE, Grainger C, Carruthers P. 2021. Linking metacognition and mindreading: evidence from autism and dual-task investigations. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 150:2206–20
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Nieuwenhuis S, Ridderinkhof KR, Blom J, Band GP, Kok A. 2001. Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: evidence from an antisaccade task. Psychophysiology 38:5752–60
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Norman DA, Shallice T 1986. Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behaviour. Consciousness and Self-Regulation RJ Davidson, GE Schwartz, D Shapiro 1–18. New York: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Pannu J, Kaszniak A. 2005. Metamemory experiments in neurological populations: a review. Neuropsychol. Rev. 15:3105–30
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Pereira M, Faivre N, Iturrate I, Wirthlin M, Serafini L et al. 2020. Disentangling the origins of confidence in speeded perceptual judgments through multimodal imaging. PNAS 117:158382–90
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Pleskac TJ, Busemeyer JR. 2010. Two-stage dynamic signal detection: a theory of choice, decision time, and confidence. Psychol. Rev. 117:3864–901
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Pouget A, Drugowitsch J, Kepecs A. 2016. Confidence and certainty: distinct probabilistic quantities for different goals. Nat. Neurosci. 19:3366–74
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Purcell BA, Kiani R. 2016. Hierarchical decision processes that operate over distinct timescales underlie choice and changes in strategy. PNAS 113:31E4531–40
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Qiu L, Su J, Ni Y, Bai Y, Zhang X et al. 2018. The neural system of metacognition accompanying decision-making in the prefrontal cortex. PLOS Biol. 16:4e2004037
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Rahnev D. 2021. Visual metacognition: measures, models, and neural correlates. Am. Psychol. 76:91445–53
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Rahnev D, Balsdon T, Charles L, de Gardelle V, Denison R et al. 2022. Consensus goals in the field of visual metacognition. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 17:61746–65
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Rahnev D, Denison RN. 2018. Suboptimality in perceptual decision making. Behav. Brain Sci. 41:e223
    [Google Scholar]
  115. Rahnev D, Desender K, Lee ALF, Adler WT, Aguilar-Lleyda D et al. 2020. The Confidence Database. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4:3317–25
    [Google Scholar]
  116. Resulaj A, Kiani R, Wolpert DM, Shadlen MN. 2009. Changes of mind in decision-making. Nature 461:7261263–66
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Rollwage M, Dolan RJ, Fleming SM. 2018. Metacognitive failure as a feature of those holding radical beliefs. Curr. Biol. 28:244014–21.e8
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Rouault M, Dayan P, Fleming SM. 2019. Forming global estimates of self-performance from local confidence. Nat. Commun. 10:11–11
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Rouault M, Fleming SM. 2020. Formation of global self-beliefs in the human brain. PNAS 117:4427268–76
    [Google Scholar]
  120. Rouault M, McWilliams A, Allen MG, Fleming SM. 2018a. Human metacognition across domains: insights from individual differences and neuroimaging. Pers. Neurosci. 1:e17
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Rouault M, Seow T, Gillan CM, Fleming SM. 2018b. Psychiatric symptom dimensions are associated with dissociable shifts in metacognition but not task performance. Biol. Psychiatry 84:6443–51
    [Google Scholar]
  122. Rouy M, de Gardelle V, Reyes G, Sackur J, Vergnaud JC et al. 2022. Metacognitive improvement: disentangling adaptive training from experimental confounds. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 151:2083–91
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Rutishauser U, Ye S, Koroma M, Tudusciuc O, Ross IB et al. 2015. Representation of retrieval confidence by single neurons in the human medial temporal lobe. Nat. Neurosci. 18:71041–50
    [Google Scholar]
  124. Sanders JI, Hangya B, Kepecs A. 2016. Signatures of a statistical computation in the human sense of confidence. Neuron 90:3499–506
    [Google Scholar]
  125. Sarafyazd M, Jazayeri M. 2019. Hierarchical reasoning by neural circuits in the frontal cortex. Science 364:6441eaav8911
    [Google Scholar]
  126. Schulz L, Rollwage M, Dolan RJ, Fleming SM. 2020. Dogmatism manifests in lowered information search under uncertainty. PNAS 117:4931527–34
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Seow TXF, Rouault M, Gillan CM, Fleming SM. 2021. How local and global metacognition shape mental health. Biol. Psychiatry 90:7436–46
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Sepulveda P, Usher M, Davies N, Benson AA, Ortoleva P, De Martino B. 2020. Visual attention modulates the integration of goal-relevant evidence and not value. eLife 9:e60705
    [Google Scholar]
  129. Shea N, Boldt A, Bang D, Yeung N, Heyes C, Frith CD. 2014. Supra-personal cognitive control and metacognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 18:4186–93
    [Google Scholar]
  130. Shea N, Frith CD. 2019. The global workspace needs metacognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 23:7560–71
    [Google Scholar]
  131. Shekhar M, Rahnev D. 2018. Distinguishing the roles of dorsolateral and anterior PFC in visual metacognition. J. Neurosci. 38:225078–87
    [Google Scholar]
  132. Shekhar M, Rahnev D. 2021. Sources of metacognitive inefficiency. Trends Cogn. Sci. 25:112–23
    [Google Scholar]
  133. Siedlecka M, Paulewicz B, Wierzchoń M. 2016. But I was so sure! Metacognitive judgments are less accurate given prospectively than retrospectively. Front. Psychol. 7:240218
    [Google Scholar]
  134. Spence ML, Dux PE, Arnold DH. 2016. Computations underlying confidence in visual perception. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 42:5671–82
    [Google Scholar]
  135. Trommershauser J, Maloney LT, Landy MS. 2008. Decision making, movement planning and statistical decision theory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12:8291–97
    [Google Scholar]
  136. Tsujimoto S, Genovesio A, Wise SP. 2010. Evaluating self-generated decisions in frontal pole cortex of monkeys. Nat. Neurosci. 13:1120–26
    [Google Scholar]
  137. Urai AE, Braun A, Donner TH. 2017. Pupil-linked arousal is driven by decision uncertainty and alters serial choice bias. Nat. Commun. 8:14637
    [Google Scholar]
  138. Vaccaro AG, Fleming SM. 2018. Thinking about thinking: a coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of metacognitive judgements. Brain Neurosci. Adv. 2:2398212818810591
    [Google Scholar]
  139. van den Berg R, Anandalingam K, Zylberberg A, Kiani R, Shadlen MN, Wolpert DM. 2016a. A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence. eLife 5:e12192
    [Google Scholar]
  140. van den Berg R, Zylberberg A, Kiani R, Shadlen MN, Wolpert DM. 2016b. Confidence is the bridge between multi-stage decisions. Curr. Biol. 26:233157–68
    [Google Scholar]
  141. van der Plas E, Zhang S, Dong K, Bang D, Li J et al. 2022. Identifying cultural differences in metacognition. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 151:123268–80
    [Google Scholar]
  142. Walker EY, Pohl S, Denison RN, Barack DL, Lee J et al. 2023. Studying the neural representations of uncertainty. Nat. Neurosci https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-023-01444-y
    [Crossref]
  143. Webb TW, Miyoshi K, So TY, Rajananda S, Lau H. 2023. Natural statistics support a rational account of confidence biases. Nat. Commun. 14:3992
    [Google Scholar]
  144. West RK, Harrison WJ, Matthews N, Mattingley JB, Sewell DK. 2023. Modality independent or modality specific? Common computations underlie confidence judgements in visual and auditory decisions. PLOS Comput. Biol. 19:7e1011245
    [Google Scholar]
  145. Wilimzig C, Tsuchiya N, Fahle M, Einhäuser W, Koch C. 2008. Spatial attention increases performance but not subjective confidence in a discrimination task. J. Vis. 8:57.1–10
    [Google Scholar]
  146. Winter CJ, Peters MAK. 2022. Variance misperception under skewed empirical noise statistics explains overconfidence in the visual periphery. Attent. Percept. Psychophys. 84:1161–78
    [Google Scholar]
  147. Wittmann MK, Kolling N, Faber NS, Scholl J, Nelissen N, Rushworth MFS. 2016. Self-other mergence in the frontal cortex during cooperation and competition. Neuron 91:2482–93
    [Google Scholar]
  148. Wittmann MK, Trudel N, Trier HA, Klein-Flügge MC, Sel A et al. 2021. Causal manipulation of self-other mergence in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex. Neuron 109:142353–61.e11
    [Google Scholar]
  149. Wokke ME, Achoui D, Cleeremans A. 2020. Action information contributes to metacognitive decision-making. Sci. Rep. 10:13632
    [Google Scholar]
  150. Wright ND, Edwards T, Fleming SM, Dolan RJ. 2012. Testosterone induces off-line perceptual learning. Psychopharmacology 224:3451–57
    [Google Scholar]
  151. Xue K, Shekhar M, Rahnev D. 2021. Examining the robustness of the relationship between metacognitive efficiency and metacognitive bias. Conscious. Cogn. 95:103196
    [Google Scholar]
  152. Yates JF, Lee JW, Shinotsuka H, Patalano AL, Sieck WR. 1998. Cross-cultural variations in probability judgment accuracy: beyond general knowledge overconfidence?. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 74:289–117
    [Google Scholar]
  153. Ye Q, Zou F, Lau H, Hu Y, Kwok SC. 2018. Causal evidence for mnemonic metacognition in human precuneus. J. Neurosci. 38:286379–87
    [Google Scholar]
  154. Yeon J, Shekhar M, Rahnev D. 2020. Overlapping and unique neural circuits are activated during perceptual decision making and confidence. Sci. Rep. 10:120761
    [Google Scholar]
  155. Yeung N, Summerfield C. 2012. Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 367:15941310–21
    [Google Scholar]
  156. Yu A, Dayan P. 2005. Uncertainty, neuromodulation, and attention. Neuron 46:4681–92
    [Google Scholar]
  157. Zheng Y, Wang D, Ye Q, Zou F, Li Y, Kwok SC. 2021. Diffusion property and functional connectivity of superior longitudinal fasciculus underpin human metacognition. Neuropsychologia 156:107847
    [Google Scholar]
  158. Zylberberg A, Barttfeld P, Sigman M. 2012. The construction of confidence in a perceptual decision. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 6:79
    [Google Scholar]
  159. Zylberberg A, Roelfsema PR, Sigman M. 2014. Variance misperception explains illusions of confidence in simple perceptual decisions. Conscious. Cogn. 27:246–53
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-022423-032425
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-022423-032425
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error