1932

Abstract

We review the phenomenon of hedonic decline, whereby repeated exposure to a stimulus typically reduces the hedonic response (e.g., enjoyment). We first discuss the typical trajectory of hedonic decline and the common research paradigms used to study it. We next discuss the most popular theories regarding general mechanisms widely believed to underlie hedonic decline. We then propose a taxonomy to organize these various general theories and to incorporate more recent work on top-down, self-reflective theories. This taxonomy identifies three general classes of antecedents to hedonic decline: physiological feedback, perceptual changes, and self-reflection. For each class, we review the supporting evidence for specifically identified antecedents and recent developments on how each antecedent influences hedonic decline. Our review focuses especially on more recent work in the growing area of self-reflection.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011542
2018-01-04
2024-04-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/psych/69/1/annurev-psych-122216-011542.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011542&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Benelam B. 2009. Satiation, satiety and their effects on eating behaviour. Nutr. Bull. 34:126–73 [Google Scholar]
  2. Berlyne DE. 1971. Aesthetics and Psychobiology East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts
  3. Bernhard N, van der Kooy D. 2000. A behavioral and genetic dissection of two forms of olfactory plasticity in Caenorhabditis elegans: adaptation and habituation. Learn. Mem. 7:199–212 [Google Scholar]
  4. Berridge KC. 2009. “Liking” and “wanting” food rewards: brain substrates and roles in eating disorders. Physiol. Behav. 97:537–50 [Google Scholar]
  5. Berthoud HR. 2011. Metabolic and hedonic drives in the neural control of appetite: Who is the boss?. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 21:888–96 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bizo LA, Bogdanov SV, Killeen PR. 1998. Satiation causes within-session decreases in instrumental responding. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 24:439–52 [Google Scholar]
  7. Blair E, Burton S. 1987. Cognitive processes used by survey respondents to answer behavioral frequency questions. J. Consum. Res. 14:280–88 [Google Scholar]
  8. Blass EM, Anderson DR, Kirkorian HL, Pempek TA, Price I, Koleini MF. 2006. On the road to obesity: Television viewing increases intake of high-density foods. Physiol. Behav. 88:597–604 [Google Scholar]
  9. Boswell W, Boudreau J, Tichy J. 2005. The relationship between employee job change and job satisfaction: the honeymoon-hangover effect. J. Appl. Psychol. 90:882–92 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brickman P, Campbell DT. 1971. Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. Adaptation-Level Theory MH Appley 287–302 New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
  11. Brickman P, Coates D, Janoff-Bulman R. 1978. Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative?. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 36:917–27 [Google Scholar]
  12. Brondel L, Romer M, Van Wymelbeke V, Pineau N, Jiang T. et al. 2009. Variety enhances food intake in humans: role of sensory-specific satiety. Physiol. Behav. 97:44–51 [Google Scholar]
  13. Brunstrom JM, Mitchell GL. 2006. Effects of distraction on the development of satiety. Br. J. Nutr. 96:761–69 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cabanac M, Duclaux R. 1970. Physiological role of pleasure. Nature 227:966–67 [Google Scholar]
  15. Campbell A. 1981. The Sense of Well-Being in America New York: McGraw-Hill
  16. Chugani SK, Irwin JR, Redden JP. 2015. Happily ever after: the effect of identity-consistency on product satiation. J. Consum. Res. 42:564–77 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cox D, Cox AD. 2002. Beyond first impressions: the effects of repeated exposure on consumer liking of visually complex and simple product designs. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 30:119–30 [Google Scholar]
  18. Crolic C, Janiszewski C. 2016. Hedonic escalation: when food just tastes better and better. J. Consum. Res. 43:3388–406 [Google Scholar]
  19. Diener E, Biswas-Diener R. 2002. Will money increase subjective well-being. Soc. Indic. Res. 57:119–69 [Google Scholar]
  20. Diener E, Lucas RE, Scollon CN. 2006. Beyond the hedonic treadmill: revising the adaptation theory of well-being. Am. Psychol. 61:305–14 [Google Scholar]
  21. Diener E, Sandvik E, Seidlitz L, Diener M. 1993. The relationship between income and subjective well-being: relative or absolute?. Soc. Indic. Res. 28:195–223 [Google Scholar]
  22. Easterlin RA. 1995. Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 27:35–47 [Google Scholar]
  23. Epstein LH, Caggiula AR, Rodefer JS, Wisneiwski L, Mitchell SL. 1993. The effects of calories and taste on habituation of the human salivary response. Addict. Behav. 18:179–85 [Google Scholar]
  24. Epstein LH, Rodefer JS, Wisniewski L, Caggiula AR. 1992. Habituation and dishabituation of human salivary response. Physiol. Behav. 51:945–50 [Google Scholar]
  25. Epstein LH, Temple JL, Roemmich JN, Bouton ME. 2009. Habituation as a determinant of human food intake. Psychol. Rev. 116:384–407 [Google Scholar]
  26. Frederick S, Loewenstein G. 1999. Hedonic adaptation. Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology E Diener, N Shwarz 302–29 New York: Russell Sage [Google Scholar]
  27. Fujita F, Diener E. 2005. Life satisfaction set point: stability and change. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 88:158–64 [Google Scholar]
  28. Galak J, Kruger J, Loewenstein G. 2011. Is variety the spice of life? It all depends on the rate of consumption. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 6:230–38 [Google Scholar]
  29. Galak J, Kruger J, Loewenstein G. 2013. Slow down! Insensitivity to rate of consumption leads to avoidable satiation. J. Consum. Res. 39:993–1009 [Google Scholar]
  30. Galak J, Redden JP, Kruger J. 2009. Variety amnesia: Recalling past variety can accelerate recovery from satiation. J. Consum. Res. 36:575–84 [Google Scholar]
  31. Galak J, Redden JP, Yang Y, Kyung EJ. 2014. How perceptions of temporal distance influence satiation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 52:118–23 [Google Scholar]
  32. Garbinsky EN, Morewedge CK, Shiv B. 2014. Interference of the end: why recency bias in memory determines when a food is consumed again. Psychol. Sci. 25:1466–74 [Google Scholar]
  33. Geier A, Wansink B, Rozin P. 2012. Red potato chips: Segmentation cues can substantially decrease food intake. Health Psychol 31:398–401 [Google Scholar]
  34. Geliebter A. 1988. Gastric distension and gastric capacity in relation to food intake in humans. Physiol. Behav. 44:665–68 [Google Scholar]
  35. Ghosal T, Yorkston E, Nunes JC, Boatwright P. 2014. Multiple reference points in sequential hedonic evaluation: an empirical analysis. J. Mark. Res. 51:5563–77 [Google Scholar]
  36. Gibbs J, Young RC, Smith GP. 1973. Cholecystokinin decreases food intake in rats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 84:488–95 [Google Scholar]
  37. Gilbert DT, Pinel EC, Wilson TD, Blumberg SJ, Wheatley TP. 1998. Immune neglect: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 75:617–38 [Google Scholar]
  38. Glanzer M. 1953. Stimulus satiation: an explanation of spontaneous alternation and related phenomena. Psychol. Rev. 60:247–68 [Google Scholar]
  39. Griffioen-Roose S, Finlayson G, Mars M, Blundell JE, de Graaf C. 2010. Measuring food reward and the transfer effect of sensory specific satiety. Appetite 55:648–55 [Google Scholar]
  40. Grossman SP. 1986. The role of glucose, insulin and glucagon in the regulation of food intake and body weight. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 10:295–315 [Google Scholar]
  41. Groves PM, Thompson RF. 1970. Habituation: a dual-process theory. Psychol. Rev. 77:419–50 [Google Scholar]
  42. Havermans RC. 2012. Stimulus specificity but no dishabituation of sensory-specific satiety. Appetite 58:852–55 [Google Scholar]
  43. Havermans RC, Brondel L. 2013. Satiety in face of variety: on sensory-specific satiety and perceived food variety. Food Qual. Preference 28:161–63 [Google Scholar]
  44. Havermans RC, Janssen T, Giesen JC, Roefs A, Jansen A. 2009. Food liking, food wanting, and sensory-specific satiety. Appetite 52:222–25 [Google Scholar]
  45. Helson H. 1947. Adaptation-level as frame of reference for prediction of psychophysical data. Am. J. Psychol. 60:1–29 [Google Scholar]
  46. Helson H. 1971. Adaptation-level theory: 1970 and after. Adaptation-Level Theory MH Appley 5–17 New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
  47. Hetherington MM, Foster R, Newman T, Anderson AS, Norton G. 2006. Understanding variety: Tasting different foods delays satiation. Physiol. Behav. 87:263–71 [Google Scholar]
  48. Hetherington MM, Rolls BJ. 1996. Sensory-specific satiety: theoretical frameworks and central characteristics. Why We Eat What We Eat: The Psychology of Eating ED Capaldi 267–90 Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  49. Hetherington MM, Rolls BJ, Burley VJ. 1989. The time course of sensory-specific satiety. Appetite 12:57–68 [Google Scholar]
  50. Higgs S, Donohoe JE. 2011. Focusing on food during lunch enhances lunch memory and decreases later snack intake. Appetite 57:202–6 [Google Scholar]
  51. Higgs S, Williamson AC, Rotshtein P, Humphreys GW. 2008. Sensory-specific satiety is intact in amnesics who eat multiple meals. Psychol. Sci. 19:623–26 [Google Scholar]
  52. Holt S, Miller J, Petocz P, Farmakalidis E. 1995. A satiety index of common foods. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 49:675–90 [Google Scholar]
  53. Inman JJ. 2001. The role of sensory-specific satiety in attribute-level variety seeking. J. Consum. Res. 28:105–20 [Google Scholar]
  54. Johnson J, Vickers Z. 1993. Effect of flavor and macronutrient composition of food servings on liking, hunger and subsequent intake. Appetite 21:25–39 [Google Scholar]
  55. Kahneman D, Miller DT. 1986. Norm theory: comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychol. Rev. 93:136–53 [Google Scholar]
  56. Kahneman D, Snell J. 1992. Predicting a changing taste: Do people know what they will like. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 5:187–200 [Google Scholar]
  57. Kamphuis M, Westerterp-Plantenga M, Saris W. 2001. Fat-specific satiety in humans for fat high in linoleic acid versus fat high in oleic acid. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 55:499–508 [Google Scholar]
  58. Kandel ER. 1991. Cellular mechanisms of learning and the biological basis of individuality. Principles of Neural Science ER Kandel, JH Schwartz, TM Jessell 1009–31 New York: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  59. Killeen PR. 1995. Economics, ecologics, and mechanics: the dynamics of responding under conditions of varying motivation. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 64:405–31 [Google Scholar]
  60. Kissileff HR, Carretta JC, Geliebter A, Pi-Sunyer XF. 2003. Cholecystokinin and stomach distension combine to reduce food intake in humans. Am. J. Phsyiol. 285:R992–98 [Google Scholar]
  61. Klayman J, Ha Y-W. 1987. Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychol. Rev. 94:211–28 [Google Scholar]
  62. Kringelbach ML, O'Doherty J, Rolls ET, Andrews C. 2000. Sensory-specific satiety for the flavour of food is represented in the orbitofrontal cortex. NeuroImage 11:S767 [Google Scholar]
  63. Kyung EJ, Menon G, Trope Y. 2010. Reconstruction of things past: Why do some memories feel so close and others so far away?. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 46:217–20 [Google Scholar]
  64. Larson JS, Redden JP, Elder RS. 2014. Satiation from sensory simulation: Evaluating foods decreases enjoyment of similar foods. J. Consum. Psychol. 24:188–94 [Google Scholar]
  65. Liebling DS, Eisner JD, Gibbs J, Smith GP. 1975. Intestinal satiety in rats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 89:955–65 [Google Scholar]
  66. Lieverse R, Jansen J, Masclee A, Lamers C. 1995. Satiety effects of a physiological dose of cholecystokinin in humans. Gut 36:176–79 [Google Scholar]
  67. Lotter EC, Woods SC. 1997. Injections of insulin and changes of body weight. Physiol. Behav. 18:293–97 [Google Scholar]
  68. Lucas RE, Clark AE. 2006. Do people really adapt to marriage?. J. Happiness Stud. 7:405–26 [Google Scholar]
  69. Lucas RE, Clark AE, Georgellis Y, Diener E. 2003. Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: reactions to changes in marital status. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 84:527–39 [Google Scholar]
  70. McSweeney FK. 2004. Dynamic changes in reinforcer effectiveness: satiation and habituation have different implications for theory and practice. Behav. Anal. 27:171–88 [Google Scholar]
  71. McSweeney FK, Murphy ES. 2000. Criticisms of the satiety hypothesis as an explanation for within‐session decreases in responding. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 74:347–61 [Google Scholar]
  72. McSweeney FK, Murphy ES. 2009. Sensitization and habituation regulate reinforcer effectiveness. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 92:189–98 [Google Scholar]
  73. Menon G, Raghubir P, Schwarz N. 1995. Behavioral frequency judgments: an accessibility-diagnosticity framework. J. Consum. Res. 22:212–28 [Google Scholar]
  74. Mook DG, Votaw MC. 1992. How important is hedonism? Reasons given by college students for ending a meal. Appetite 18:69–75 [Google Scholar]
  75. Moran TH, Dailey MJ. 2011. Intestinal feedback signaling and satiety. Physiol. Behav. 105:77–81 [Google Scholar]
  76. Morewedge CK, Huh YE, Vosgerau J. 2010. Thought for food: Imagined consumption reduces actual consumption. Science 330:1530–33 [Google Scholar]
  77. Nelson LD, Meyvis T. 2008. Disrupting adaptation to hedonic experiences. J. Mark. Res. 45:654–64 [Google Scholar]
  78. Nelson LD, Meyvis T, Galak J. 2009. Enhancing the television viewing experience through commercial interruptions. J. Consum. Res. 36:160–72 [Google Scholar]
  79. Nicolao L, Irwin JR, Goodman JK. 2009. Happiness for sale: Do experiential purchases make consumers happier than material purchases?. J. Consum. Res. 36:188–98 [Google Scholar]
  80. Nolan LJ, Hetherington MM. 2009. The effects of sham feeding-induced sensory specific satiation and food variety on subsequent food intake in humans. Appetite 52:720–25 [Google Scholar]
  81. O'Donohue W, Plaud JJ. 1991. The long-term habituation of sexual arousal in the human male. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 22:87–96 [Google Scholar]
  82. O'Sullivan HL, Alexander E, Ferriday D, Brunstrom JM. 2010. Effects of repeated exposure on liking for a reduced-energy-dense food. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 91:1584–89 [Google Scholar]
  83. Parducci A. 1995. Happiness, Pleasure, and Judgment: The Contextual Theory and Its Applications Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  84. Peters JH, McKay BM, Simasko SM, Ritter RC. 2005. Leptin-induced satiation mediated by abdominal vagal afferents. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 288:R879–84 [Google Scholar]
  85. Quoidbach J, Dunn EW. 2013. Give it up: a strategy for combating hedonic adaptation. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 4:563–68 [Google Scholar]
  86. Raghunathan R, Irwin JR. 2001. Walking the hedonic product treadmill: default contrast and mood-based assimilation in judgments of predicted happiness with a target product. J. Consum. Res. 28:355–68 [Google Scholar]
  87. Rankin CH, Abrams T, Barry RJ, Bhatnagar S, Clayton DF. et al. 2009. Habituation revisited: an updated and revised description of the behavioral characteristics of habituation. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 92:135–38 [Google Scholar]
  88. Raynor HA, Epstein LH. 1999. Effects of sensory stimulation and post-ingestive consequences on satiation. Physiol. Behav. 70:465–70 [Google Scholar]
  89. Read D, Loewenstein G. 1995. Diversification bias: explaining the discrepancy in variety seeking between combined and separated choices. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 1:34–49 [Google Scholar]
  90. Redden JP. 2008. Reducing satiation: the role of categorization level. J. Consum. Res. 34:624–34 [Google Scholar]
  91. Redden JP. 2015. Desire over time: the multi-faceted nature of satiation. The Psychology of Desire W Hofmann, LF Nordgren 82–103 New York: Guilford Press [Google Scholar]
  92. Redden JP, Galak J. 2013. The subjective sense of feeling satiated. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 142:209–17 [Google Scholar]
  93. Redden JP, Haws KL. 2013. Healthy satiation: the role of decreasing desire in effective self-control. J. Consum. Res. 39:1100–14 [Google Scholar]
  94. Redden JP, Haws KL, Chen J. 2017. The ability to choose can increase satiation. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 112:2186–200 [Google Scholar]
  95. Robinson E, Aveyard P, Daley A, Jolly K, Lewis A. et al. 2013. Eating attentively: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of food intake memory and awareness on eating. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 97:4728–42 [Google Scholar]
  96. Rolls BJ, Rolls ET, Rowe EA, Sweeney K. 1981. Sensory specific satiety in man. Physiol. Behav. 27:137–42 [Google Scholar]
  97. Rolls ET, de Waal AWL. 1985. Long-term sensory-specific satiety: evidence from an Ethiopian refugee camp. Physiol. Behav. 34:1017–20 [Google Scholar]
  98. Rolls ET, Rolls JH. 1997. Olfactory sensory-specific satiety in humans. Physiol. Behav. 61:467–73 [Google Scholar]
  99. Rupp HA, Wallen K. 2007. Relationship between testosterone and interest in sexual stimuli: the effect of experience. Horm. Behav. 52:581–89 [Google Scholar]
  100. Sackett AM, Meyvis T, Nelson LD, Converse BA, Sackett AL. 2010. You're having fun when time flies: the hedonic consequences of subjective time progression. Psychol. Sci. 21:111–17 [Google Scholar]
  101. Schellenberg EG, Peretz I, Vieillard S. 2008. Liking for happy- and sad-sounding music: effects of exposure. Cogn. Emot. 22:218–37 [Google Scholar]
  102. Schifferstein HNJ, Kuiper WE. 1997. Sequence effects in hedonic judgments of taste stimuli. Percept. Psychophys. 59:900–12 [Google Scholar]
  103. Schulz R, Decker S. 1985. Long-term adjustment to physical disability: the role of social support, perceived control, and self-blame. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 48:1162–72 [Google Scholar]
  104. Semin GR, Smith ER. 1999. Revisiting the past and back to the future: memory systems and the linguistic representation of social events. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 76:877–92 [Google Scholar]
  105. Sevilla J, Redden JP. 2014. Perceived scarcity reduces the rate of satiation. J. Mark. Res. 51:205–17 [Google Scholar]
  106. Sevilla J, Zhang J, Kahn BE. 2016. Anticipation of future variety reduces satiation from current experiences. J. Mark. Res. 53:6954–68 [Google Scholar]
  107. Sheldon KM, Lyubomirsky S. 2012. The challenge of staying happier: testing the hedonic adaptation prevention model. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 38:670–80 [Google Scholar]
  108. Shwarz N, Hippler H-J, Deutsch B, Strack F. 1985. Effects of category range on reported behavior and comparative judgments. Public Opin. Q. 49:388–95 [Google Scholar]
  109. Simonson I. 1990. The effect of purchase quantity and timing on variety-seeking behavior. J. Mark. Res. 27:150–62 [Google Scholar]
  110. Soloman RL, Corbit JD. 1974. An opponent-process theory of motivation: I. Temporal dynamics of affect. Psychol. Rev. 81:119–45 [Google Scholar]
  111. Sorensen LB, Moller P, Flint A, Martens M, Raben A. 2003. Effect of sensory perception of foods on appetite and food intake: a review of studies on humans. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 27:1152–66 [Google Scholar]
  112. Stevenson B, Wolfers J. 2013. Subjective well-being and income: Is there any evidence of satiation?. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:598–604 [Google Scholar]
  113. Temple JL, Giacomelli AM, Roemmich JN, Epstein LH. 2008a. Dietary variety impairs habituation in children. Health Psychol 27:S10–19 [Google Scholar]
  114. Temple JL, Giacomelli AM, Roemmich JN, Epstein LH. 2008b. Habituation and within session changes in motivated responding for food in children. Appetite 50:390–96 [Google Scholar]
  115. Thompson RF, Spencer WA. 1966. Habituation: a model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior. Psychol. Rev. 73:16–43 [Google Scholar]
  116. Tuiten A, van Hok J, Koppeschaar H, Bernaards C, Thijssen J, Verbaten R. 2000. Time course of effects of testosterone administration on sexual arousal in women. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 57:149–53 [Google Scholar]
  117. Van De Veer E, Van Herpen E, Van Trijp HC. 2015. Body and mind: Mindfulness helps consumers to compensate for prior food intake by enhancing the responsiveness to physiological cues. J. Consum. Res. 42:5783–803 [Google Scholar]
  118. Wang GJ, Tomasi D, Backus W, Wang R, Telang F. et al. 2008. Gastric distention activates satiety circuitry in the human brain. NeuroImage 39:1824–31 [Google Scholar]
  119. Wansink B. 2005. Bottomless bowls: why visual cues of portion size may influence intake. Obes. Res. 13:93–100 [Google Scholar]
  120. Wansink B, Rozin P, Geiger A. 2005. Consumption interruption and the red potato chip: packaging ideas that help control consumption Work. Pap. 05–110 Cornell Food Brand Lab, Cornell Univ. Ithaca, NY:
  121. Weijzen PL, Smeets PA, de Graaf C. 2009. Sip size of orangeade: effects on intake and sensory-specific satiation. Br. J. Nutr. 102:1091–97 [Google Scholar]
  122. Wilson TD, Gilbert DT. 2008. Explaining away: a model of affective adaptation. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 3:5370–86 [Google Scholar]
  123. Woods SC, Schwartz MW, Baskin DG, Seeley RJ. 2000. Food intake and the regulation of body weight. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 51:255–77 [Google Scholar]
  124. Wortman CB, Silver RC. 1987. Coping with irrevocable loss Presented at Am. Psychol. Assoc. Conv., Aug. Washington, DC:
  125. Yang Y, Galak J. 2015. Sentimental value and its influence on hedonic adaptation. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 109:767–90 [Google Scholar]
  126. Zajonc RB. 1968. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 9:1–27 [Google Scholar]
  127. Zamble E. 1992. Behavior and adaptation in long-term prison inmates. Descriptive longitudinal results. Crim. Justice Behav. 19:409–25 [Google Scholar]
  128. Zauberman G, Levav J, Diehl K, Bhargave R. 2010. 1995 feels so close yet so far: the effect of event markers on subjective feelings of elapsed time. Psychol. Sci. 21:133–39 [Google Scholar]
  129. Zhang F, Chen Y, Heiman M, DiMarchi R. 2005. Leptin: structure, function and biology. Vitam. Horm. 71:345–72 [Google Scholar]
  130. Zhang Y, Proenca R, Maffei M, Barone M, Leopold L, Friedman JM. 1994. Positional cloning of the mouse obese gene and its human homologue. Nature 372:425–32 [Google Scholar]
  131. Zhao M, Tsai C. 2011. The effects of duration knowledge on forecasted versus actual affective experiences. J. Consum. Res. 38:525–34 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011542
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011542
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error