1932

Abstract

Research on the work-family interface began in the 1960s and has grown exponentially ever since. This vast amount of research, however, has had relatively little impact on workplace practice, and work-family conflict is at an all-time high. We review the work-family research to date and propose that a shift of attention is required, away from the individual experience of work and family and toward understanding how identity and status are defined at work. Several factors enshrine cherished identities around current workplace norms. The work devotion schema demands that those who are truly committed to their work will make it the central or sole focus of their lives, without family demands to distract them. Importantly, the work devotion schema underwrites valued class and gender identities: Work devotion is a key way of enacting elite class status and functions as the measure of a man—the longer the work hours and higher the demand for his attention, the better. Advocating change in the way work is done and life is lived meets resistance because it places these cherished identities at risk. Resistance to these identity threats keeps current workplace norms in place. This is why even the business case—which shows that current practices are not economically efficient—fails to persuade organizations to enact change. What is needed now is sustained attention to the implicit psychological infrastructure that cements the mismatch between today's workplace and today's workforce.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033710
2016-01-04
2024-12-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/psych/67/1/annurev-psych-122414-033710.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033710&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Allen TD. 2001. Family supportive work environments: the role of organizational perceptions. J. Vocat. Behav. 58:414–35 [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen TD. 2012. The work and family interface. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology SWJ Kozlowski 1163–98 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  3. Allen TD, Johnson RC, Saboe KN, Cho E, Dumani S, Evans S. 2012. Dispositional variables and work-family conflict: a meta-analysis. J. Vocat. Behav. 80:17–26 [Google Scholar]
  4. Allen TD, Lapierre LM, Spector PE, Poelmans SAY, O'Driscoll M. et al. 2014. The link between national paid leave policy and work-family conflict among married working parents. Appl. Psychol. 63:5–28 [Google Scholar]
  5. Allis P, O'Driscoll M. 2007. Positive effects of nonwork-to-work facilitation on well-being in work, family and personal domains. J. Manag. Psychol. 23:273–91 [Google Scholar]
  6. Amstad FT, Meier LL, Fasel U, Elfering A, Semmer NK. 2011. A meta-analysis of work-family conflict and various outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching domain relations. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 16:151–69 [Google Scholar]
  7. Anderson SE, Coffey BS, Byerly RT. 2002. Formal organizational initiatives and informal workplace practices: links to work-family conflict and job-related outcomes. J. Manag. 28:787–810 [Google Scholar]
  8. Aumann K, Galinsky E, Matos K. 2011. The New Male Mystique New York: Fam. Work Inst. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bailyn L. 1993. Breaking the Mold: Women, Men, and Time in the New Corporate World New York: Free Press [Google Scholar]
  10. Bailyn L, Rapoport R, Fletcher JK, Pruitt BH. 2002. Beyond Work-Family Balance: Advancing Gender Equity and Workplace Performance San Francisco: Jossey-Bass [Google Scholar]
  11. Barnett RC, Hyde JS. 2001. Women, men, work and family. Am. Psychol. 56:781–96 [Google Scholar]
  12. Behson SJ. 2005. The relative contribution of formal and informal organizational work-family support. J. Vocat. Behav. 66:487–500 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bellavia GM, Frone MR. 2005. Work-family conflict. Handbook of Work Stress J Barling, EK Kolloway, MR Frone 113–48 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
  14. Benard S, Correll SJ. 2010. Normative discrimination and the motherhood penalty. Gender Soc. 24:616–46 [Google Scholar]
  15. Berdahl JL. 2007. Harassment based on sex: protecting social status in the context of gender hierarchy. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32:641–58 [Google Scholar]
  16. Berdahl JL, Moon SH. 2013. Workplace mistreatment of middle class workers based on sex, parenthood, and caregiving. J. Soc. Issues 69:341–66 [Google Scholar]
  17. Berg P, Kossek EE, Misra K, Belman D. 2014. Work-life flexibility policies: Do unions affect employee access and use?. Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 67:111–37 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bhargava S, Baral R. 2009. Antecedents and consequences of work-family enrichment among Indian managers. Psychol. Stud. 54:213–25 [Google Scholar]
  19. Bianchi SM, Milkie MA. 2010. Work and family research in the first decade of the 21st century. J. Marriage Fam. 72:705–25 [Google Scholar]
  20. Bianchi SM, Milkie MA, Sayer LC, Robinson JP. 2000. Is anyone doing the housework? U.S. trends and gender differentials in domestic labor. Soc. Forces 79:191–228 [Google Scholar]
  21. Blair-Loy M. 2003. Competing Devotions: Career and Family Among Women Executives Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  22. Blair-Loy M, Wharton AS. 2004. Mothers in finance: surviving and thriving. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 596:151–71 [Google Scholar]
  23. Bloom N, Roberts J. 2015. A working from home experiment shows high performers like it better. Harvard Bus. Rev. Jan. 23 [Google Scholar]
  24. Bond T, Thompson C, Galinsky E, Prottas D. 2002. Highlights of the National Study of the Changing Workforce New York: Fam. Work Inst. [Google Scholar]
  25. Branscombe NR, Ellemers N, Spears R, Doosje B. 1999. The context and content of social identity threat. Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content N Ellemers, R Spears, B Doosje 35–58 Oxford, UK: Blackwell Sci. [Google Scholar]
  26. Butler AB, Skattebo A. 2004. What is acceptable for women may not be for men: the effect of family conflicts with work on job-performance ratings. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 77:553–64 [Google Scholar]
  27. Butts MM, Casper WJ, Yang TS. 2013. How important are work-family support policies? A meta-analytic investigation of their effects on employee outcomes. J. Appl. Psychol. 98:1–25 [Google Scholar]
  28. Byron K. 2005. A meta-analytic review of work-family conflict and its antecedents. J. Vocat. Behav. 67:169–98 [Google Scholar]
  29. Casper WJ, Eby LT, Bordeaux C, Lockwood A, Lambert D. 2007. A review of research methods in IO/OB work-family research. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:28–43 [Google Scholar]
  30. Cha Y, Weeden KA. 2014. Overwork and the slow convergence in the gender gap in wages. Am. Sociol. Rev. 79:457–84 [Google Scholar]
  31. Cinamon RG, Rich Y. 2002. Profiles of attribution of importance to life roles and their implications for the work-family conflict. J. Couns. Psychol. 49:212–20 [Google Scholar]
  32. Cohn D, Livingston G, Wang W. 2014. April 8. After decades of decline, a rise in stay-at-home mothers. Washington, DC: Pew Res. Cent http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2014/04/08/after-decades-of-decline-a-rise-in-stay-at-home-mothers/ [Google Scholar]
  33. Coltrane S, Miller EC, DeHaan T, Stewart L. 2013. Fathers and the flexibility stigma. J. Soc. Issues 69:279–302 [Google Scholar]
  34. Cooper M. 2000. Being the “go-to guy”: fatherhood, masculinity, and the organization of work in Silicon Valley. Qual. Sociol. 23:379–405 [Google Scholar]
  35. Correll S, Kelly E, O'Connor LT, Williams JC. 2014. Redesigning, redefining work. Work Occup. 41:3–17 [Google Scholar]
  36. Crouter AC. 1984. Spillover from family to work: the neglected side of the work-family interface. Hum. Relat. 37:425–42 [Google Scholar]
  37. Cuddy AJC, Fiske ST, Glick P. 2004. When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn't cut the ice. J. Soc. Issues 60:701–18 [Google Scholar]
  38. Culbertson SS, Mills MJ, Fullagar CJ. 2012. Work engagement and work-family facilitation: making homes happier through positive affective spillover. Hum. Relat. 65:1155–77 [Google Scholar]
  39. de Janasz S, Behson SJ, Jonsen K, Lankau MJ. 2013. Dual sources of support for dual roles: how mentoring and work-family culture influence work-family conflict and job attitudes. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 24:1435–53 [Google Scholar]
  40. Dilworth JL. 2004. Predictors of negative spillover from family to work. J. Fam. Issues 25:241–61 [Google Scholar]
  41. Eagly AH. 1987. Sex Differences in Social behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
  42. Eaton SC. 2003. If you can use them: flexibility policies, organizational commitment and perceived performance. Ind. Relat. 42:145–67 [Google Scholar]
  43. Eby LT, Casper WJ, Lockwood A, Bordeaux C, Brinley A. 2005. Work and family research in IO/OB: content analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002). J. Vocat. Behav. 66:1124–97 [Google Scholar]
  44. Ely RJ, Meyerson DE. 2000. Theories of gender in organizations: a new approach to organizational analysis and change. Res. Organ. Behav. 22:103–51 [Google Scholar]
  45. Ely RJ, Meyerson DE. 2010. An organizational approach to undoing gender: the unlikely case of offshore oil platforms. Res. Organ. Behav. 30:3–34 [Google Scholar]
  46. Epstein CF, Seron C, Oglensky B, Saute R. 1999. The Part-Time Paradox: Time Norms, Professional Life, Family and Gender London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  47. Ferguson M, Carlson D, Zivnuska S, Whitten D. 2012. Support at work and home: the path to satisfaction through balance. J. Vocat. Behav. 80:299–307 [Google Scholar]
  48. Ford MT, Heinen BA, Langkamer KL. 2007. Work and family satisfaction and conflict: a meta-analysis of cross-domain relations. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:157–80 [Google Scholar]
  49. Frone MR, Russell M, Cooper ML. 1992. Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: testing a model of the work-family interface. J. Appl. Psychol. 77:65–78 [Google Scholar]
  50. Fuegan K, Biernat M, Haines E, Deaux K. 2004. Mothers and fathers in the workplace: how gender and parental status influence judgments of job-related competence. J. Soc. Issues 60:737–54 [Google Scholar]
  51. Gerstel N, Clawson D. 2001. Unions' responses to family concerns. Soc. Probl. 48:277–98 [Google Scholar]
  52. Glass JL. 2004. Blessing or curse? Work-family policies and mother's wage growth over time. Work Occup. 31:367–94 [Google Scholar]
  53. Goode WJ. 1960. A theory of role strain. Am. Sociol. Rev. 25:483–96 [Google Scholar]
  54. Goodman WB, Crouter AC. 2009. Longitudinal associations between maternal work stress, negative work-family spillover, and depressive symptoms. Fam. Relat. 58:245–58 [Google Scholar]
  55. Gornick JC, Meyers MK. 2003. Families That Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  56. Greenberger E, O'Neil R. 1993. Spouse, parent, worker: role commitments and role-related experiences in the construction of adults' well-being. Dev. Psychol. 29:181–97 [Google Scholar]
  57. Greenhaus JH, Beutell NJ. 1985. Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Acad. Manag. Rev. 10:76–88 [Google Scholar]
  58. Greenhaus JH, Parasuraman S. 1999. Research on work, family, and gender: current status and future directions. Handbook of Gender and Work GN Powell 391–412 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
  59. Greenhaus JH, Peng AC, Allen TD. 2012. Relations of work identity, family identity, situational demands, and sex with employee work hours. J. Vocat. Behav. 80:27–37 [Google Scholar]
  60. Greenhaus JH, Powell GN. 2006. When work and family are allies: a theory of work-family enrichment. Acad. Manag. Rev. 31:72–92 [Google Scholar]
  61. Grzywacz JG, Carlson DS. 2007. Conceptualizing work-family balance: implications for practice and research. Adv. Dev. Hum. Resour. 9:455–71 [Google Scholar]
  62. Grzywacz JG, Carlson DS, Kacmar KM, Wayne JH. 2007. A multi-level perspective on the synergies between work and family. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 80:559–74 [Google Scholar]
  63. Grzywacz JG, Marks NF. 2000. Reconceptualizing the work-family interface: an ecological perspective on the correlates of positive and negative spillover between work and family. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 5:111–26 [Google Scholar]
  64. Gutek BA, Searle S, Klepa L. 1991. Rational versus gender role explanations for work-family conflict. J. Appl. Psychol. 76:560–68 [Google Scholar]
  65. Haar JM, Bardoel EA. 2008. Positive spillover from the work-family interface: a study of Australian employees. Asia Pac. J. Hum. Resour. 46:275–87 [Google Scholar]
  66. Hall GB, Dollard MF, Tuckey MR, Winefield AH, Thompson BM. 2010. Job demands, work-family conflict, and emotional exhaustion in police officers: a longitudinal test of competing theories. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 83:237–50 [Google Scholar]
  67. Hammer LB, Cullen JC, Neal MB, Sinclair RR, Shafiro MV. 2005. The longitudinal effects of work-family conflict and positive spillover on depressive symptoms among dual-earner couples. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 10:138–54 [Google Scholar]
  68. Hammer LB, Kossek EE, Bodner T, Anger K, Zimmerman K. 2011. Clarifying work-family intervention processes: the roles of work-family conflict and family supportive supervisor behaviors. J. Appl. Psychol. 96:134–50 [Google Scholar]
  69. Hartung D, Hahlweg K. 2011. Stress reduction at the work-family interface: Positive parenting and self-efficacy as mechanisms of change in Workplace Triple P. Behav. Modif. 35:54–77 [Google Scholar]
  70. Henly JR, Shaefer HL, Waxman E. 2006. Nonstandard work schedules: employer- and employee-driven flexibility in retail jobs. Soc. Serv. Rev. 80:609–34 [Google Scholar]
  71. Heymann J. 2013. Children's Chances: How Countries Can Move from Surviving to Thriving Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  72. Heymann J, Boynton-Jarrett R, Carter P, Bond JT, Galinsky E. 2002. Work-Family Issues and Low-Income Families New York: Ford Found. [Google Scholar]
  73. Hill EJ, Allen S, Jacob J, Bair AF, Bikhazi SL. et al. 2007. Work-family facilitation: expanding theoretical understanding through qualitative exploration. Adv. Dev. Hum. Resour. 9:507–26 [Google Scholar]
  74. Hochschild A. 1989. The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home New York: Penguin [Google Scholar]
  75. Hochschild A. 1997. The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work New York: Metropolitan/Holt [Google Scholar]
  76. Humberd B, Ladge JJ, Harrington B. 2015. The “new” dad: navigating fathering identity within organizations. J. Bus. Psychol. 30:249–66 [Google Scholar]
  77. Hunter EM, Perry SJ, Carlson DS, Smith SA. 2010. Linking team resources to work-family enrichment and satisfaction. J. Vocat. Behav. 77:304–12 [Google Scholar]
  78. Innstrand ST, Langballe EM, Espnes GA, Aasland OG, Falkum E. 2010. Work-home conflict and facilitation across four different family structures in Norway. Community Work Fam. 13:231–49 [Google Scholar]
  79. Jacobs JA, Gerson K. 2004. The Time Divide: Work, Family, and Gender Inequality Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  80. Judiesch MK, Lyness KS. 1999. Left behind? The impact of leaves of absence on managers' career success. Acad. Manag. J. 42:641–51 [Google Scholar]
  81. Kahn RL, Wolfe DM, Quinn R, Snoek JD, Rosenthal RA. 1964. Organizational Stress New York: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  82. Kanter RM. 1977. Work and Family in the United States: A Critical Review and Agenda for Research and Policy New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  83. Kantor J. 2014. Working anything but 9 to 5. New York Times Aug. 13. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/08/13/us/starbucks-workers-scheduling-hours.html [Google Scholar]
  84. Karatepe OS, Bekteshi L. 2008. Antecedents and outcomes of work-family facilitation and family-work facilitation among frontline hotel employees. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 27:4517–28 [Google Scholar]
  85. Kellogg KC. 2011. Challenging Operations: Medical Reform and Resistance in Surgery Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  86. Kelly EL, Kossek EE, Hammer LB, Durham M, Bray J. et al. 2008. Getting there from here: research on the effects of work-family initiatives on work-family conflict and business outcomes. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2:305–49 [Google Scholar]
  87. Kelly EL, Moen P. 2007. Rethinking the clockwork of work: why schedule control may pay off at work and at home. Adv. Dev. Hum. Resour. 9:487–506 [Google Scholar]
  88. Kelly EL, Moen P, Oakes JM, Fan W, Okechukwu C. et al. 2014. Changing work and work-family conflict: evidence from the work, family, and health network. Am. Sociol. Rev. 79:485–516 [Google Scholar]
  89. Kelly EL, Moen P, Tranby E. 2011. Changing workplaces to reduce work-family conflict: schedule control in a white-collar organization. Am. Sociol. Rev. 76:265–90 [Google Scholar]
  90. Kirchmeyer C. 1993. Nonwork-to-work spillover: a more balanced view of the experiences and coping of professional women and men. Sex Roles 28:531–52 [Google Scholar]
  91. Kobrynowicz D, Biernat M. 1997. Decoding subjective evaluations: how stereotypes provide shifting standards. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 33:579–601 [Google Scholar]
  92. Korabik K, McElwain A, Chappell DB. 2008. Integrating gender-related issues into research on work and family. Handbook of Work-Family Integration: Research, Theory, and Best Practices K Korabik, DS Lero, DL Whitehead 215–32 Amsterdam: Academic [Google Scholar]
  93. Kossek EE, Baltes BB, Matthews RA. 2011a. How work-family research can finally have an impact in organizations. Ind. Organ. Psychol.: Perspect. Sci. Pract. 4:352–69 [Google Scholar]
  94. Kossek EE, Baltes BB, Matthews RA. 2011b. Innovative ideas on how work-family research can have more impact. Ind. Organ. Psychol.: Perspect. Sci. Pract. 4:426–32 [Google Scholar]
  95. Kossek EE, Hammer LB, Thompson RJ, Burke LB. 2014. Leveraging Workplace Flexibility for Engagement and Productivity. SHRM Found. Eff. Pract. Guidel. Ser. Alexandria, VA: SHRM Found. [Google Scholar]
  96. Kossek EE, Lautsch BA, Eaton SC. 2006. Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work-family effectiveness. J. Vocat. Behav. 68:347–67 [Google Scholar]
  97. Kossek EE, Michel JS. 2010. Flexible work schedules. APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 1 S Zedeck 535–72 Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  98. Kossek EE, Ozeki C. 1998. Work-family conflict, policies, and the job-life satisfaction relationship: a review and directions for organizational behavior-human resources research. J. Appl. Psychol. 83:139–49 [Google Scholar]
  99. Kwan HK, Mao Y, Zhang H. 2010. The impact of role-modeling on protégés' personal learning and work-family enrichment. J. Vocat. Behav. 77:2313–22 [Google Scholar]
  100. Lambert SJ. 2008. Passing the buck: labor flexibility practices that transfer risk onto hourly workers. Hum. Relat. 61:1203–27 [Google Scholar]
  101. Lambert SJ, Fugiel PJ, Henly JR. 2014. Precarious Working Schedules Among Early-Career Employees in the US: A National Snapshot Chicago: EINet, School Soc. Serv. Admin., Univ. Chicago [Google Scholar]
  102. Lamont M. 2012. Money, Morals, and Manners: The Culture of the French and American Upper-Middle Class Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  103. Lee E-S, Chang JY, Kim H. 2011. The work-family interface in Korea: Can family life enrich work life?. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 22:2032–53 [Google Scholar]
  104. Lee NY, Zvonkovic AM, Crawford DW. 2014. The impact of work-family conflict and facilitation on women's perceptions of role balance. J. Fam. Issues 35:1252–74 [Google Scholar]
  105. Leslie LM, Manchester CF, Park T, Mehng SA. 2012. Flexible work practices: a source of career premiums or penalties?. Acad. Manag. J. 55:1407–28 [Google Scholar]
  106. Lobosco K. 2015. Walmart's other promise to workers: better schedules. CNN Money Feb. 19. http://money.cnn.com/2015/02/19/news/companies/walmart-wages-schedules/ [Google Scholar]
  107. Maertz CP, Boyar SL. 2011. Work-family conflict, enrichment, and balance under “levels” and “episodes” approaches. J. Manag. 37:68–98 [Google Scholar]
  108. Masuda AD, McNall LA, Allen TD, Nicklin JM. 2012. Examining the constructs of work-to-family enrichment and positive spillover. J. Vocat. Behav. 80:197–210 [Google Scholar]
  109. McNall LA, Masuda AD, Shanock LR, Nicklin JM. 2011. Interaction of core self-evaluations and perceived organizational support on work-to-family enrichment. J. Psychol. 145:2133–49 [Google Scholar]
  110. McNall LA, Nicklin JM, Masuda AD. 2010. A meta-analytic review of the consequences associated with work-family enrichment. J. Bus. Psychol. 25:381–96 [Google Scholar]
  111. Merton RK. 1949. Social Theory and Social Structure New York: Free Press [Google Scholar]
  112. Michel JS, Clark MA, Jaramillo D. 2011. The role of the Five Factor Model of personality in the perceptions of negative and positive forms of work-nonwork spillover: a meta-analytic review. J. Vocat. Behav. 79:191–203 [Google Scholar]
  113. Moen P, Kelly E, Hill R. 2011. Does enhancing work-time control and flexibility reduce turnover? A naturally occurring experiment. Soc. Probl. 58:69–98 [Google Scholar]
  114. Molino M, Ghislieri C, Cortese CG. 2013. When work enriches family life: the meditational role of professional development opportunities. J. Workplace Learn. 25:98–113 [Google Scholar]
  115. Munsch CL. 2015. Transformations in masculinity and homophobia. Presented at Intl. Conf. on Masculinities: Engaging Men and Boys for Gender Equity March 5–8, New York, NY [Google Scholar]
  116. Ng TWH, Feldman DC. 2008. Long work hours: a social identity perspective on meta-analysis data. J. Organ. Behav. 29:853–80 [Google Scholar]
  117. Nohe C, Meier LL, Sonntag K, Michel A. 2015. The chicken or the egg? A meta-analysis of panel studies of the relationship between work-family conflict and strain. J. Appl. Psychol. 100:522–36 [Google Scholar]
  118. OECD (Organ. Econ. Coop. Dev.) 2014. Average annual hours actually worked per worker [data set].. Paris: OECD http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?DataSetCode=ANHRS [Google Scholar]
  119. Ollier-Malaterre A, Valcour M, den Dulk L, Kossek EE. 2013. Theorizing national context to develop comparative work-life research: a review and research agenda. Eur. Manag. J. 31:433–47 [Google Scholar]
  120. Paustian-Underdahl SC, Halbesleben JRB. 2014. Examining the influence of climate, supervisor guidance, and behavioral integrity on work-family conflict: a demands and resources approach. J. Organ. Behav. 35:447–63 [Google Scholar]
  121. Perlow LA. 2012. Sleeping with Your Smart Phone: How to Break the 24/7 Habit and Change the Way You Work Cambridge, MA: Harvard Bus. Rev. Press [Google Scholar]
  122. Perlow LA, Kelly EL. 2014. Toward a model of work redesign for better work and better life. Work Occup. 41:111–34 [Google Scholar]
  123. Perrewe PL, Hochwarter WA. 2001. Can we really have it all? The attainment of work and family values. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 10:29–33 [Google Scholar]
  124. Pleck JH. 1977. The work-family role system. Soc. Probl. 24:417–27 [Google Scholar]
  125. Radcliffe LS, Cassell C. 2014. Resolving couples' work-family conflicts: the complexity of decision making and the introduction of a new framework. Hum. Relat. 67:793–819 [Google Scholar]
  126. Rapoport R, Rapoport R. 1971. Dual-Career Families Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books [Google Scholar]
  127. Reid E. 2015. Embracing, passing, revealing and the ideal worker image: how people navigate expected and experienced professional identities. Organ. Sci. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.0975 [Google Scholar]
  128. Ressler C, Thompson J. 2008. Why Work Sucks and How to Fix It New York: Penguin [Google Scholar]
  129. Roehling PV, Jarvis LH, Swope HE. 2005. Variations in negative work-family spillover among white, black, and Hispanic American men and women. J. Fam. Issues 26:840–65 [Google Scholar]
  130. Rogier SA, Padgett MY. 2004. The impact of utilizing a flexible work schedule on the perceived career advancement potential of women. Hum. Resour. Dev. Q. 15:89–106 [Google Scholar]
  131. Rost I, Mostert K. 2007. The interaction between work and home of employees in the earthmoving equipment industry: measurement and prevalence. SA J. Ind. Psychol. 33:54–61 [Google Scholar]
  132. Rothbard NP. 2001. Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Adm. Sci. Q. 46:655–84 [Google Scholar]
  133. Rotundo DM, Kincaid JF. 2008. Conflict, facilitation, and individual coping styles across the work and family domains. J. Manag. Psychol. 23:484–506 [Google Scholar]
  134. Ruderman MN, Ohlott PJ, Panzer K, King SN. 2002. Benefits of multiple roles for managerial women. Acad. Manag. J. 45:369–86 [Google Scholar]
  135. Rudman LA, Mescher K. 2013. Penalizing men who request a family leave: Is flexibility stigma a femininity stigma?. J. Soc. Issues 69:322–40 [Google Scholar]
  136. Russo M, Buonocore F. 2012. The relationship between work-family enrichment and nurse turnover. J. Manag. Psychol. 27:216–36 [Google Scholar]
  137. Schulte B. 2014. Overwhelmed: Work, Love, and Play When No One Has the Time New York: Sarah Crichton Books [Google Scholar]
  138. Shows C, Gerstel N. 2009. Fathering, class, and gender: a comparison of physicians and emergency medical technicians. Gender Soc. 23:161–87 [Google Scholar]
  139. SHRM (Soc. Hum. Resour. Manag.) 2010. 2010 employee benefits: examining employee benefits in the midst of a recovering economy. http://www.shrm.org/research/surveyfindings/articles/documents/10-0280%20employee%20benefits%20survey%20report-fnl.pdf
  140. Siu O, Lu J, Brough P, Lu C, Bakker A. et al. 2010. Role resources and work-family enrichment: the role of work engagement. J. Vocat. Behav. 77:470–80 [Google Scholar]
  141. Stone P. 2007. Opting Out? Why Women Really Quit Careers and Head Home Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  142. Streib J. 2015. The Power of the Past: Understanding Cross-Class Marriages New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  143. Sumer HC, Knight PA. 2001. How do people with different attachment styles balance work and family? A personality perspective on work-family linkage. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:653–63 [Google Scholar]
  144. Swanberg JE, McKechnie SP, Ojha MU, James JB. 2011. Schedule control, supervisor support and work engagement: a winning combination for workers in hourly jobs?. J. Vocat. Behav. 79:613–24 [Google Scholar]
  145. Thompson CS, Beauvais LL, Lyness KS. 1999. When work-family benefits are not enough: The influence of work-family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work-family conflict. J. Vocat. Behav. 54:392–415 [Google Scholar]
  146. Tompson HB, Werner JM. 1997. The impact of role conflict/facilitation on core and discretionary behaviors: testing a mediated model. J. Manag. 23:583–601 [Google Scholar]
  147. Trades Union Congr 2008. Single women in their thirties do more unpaid overtime than anyone else.. London: TUC http://www.tuc.org.uk/equality-issues/childcare/equal-pay/single-women-their-30s-do-more-unpaid-overtime-anyone-else [Google Scholar]
  148. Vandello JA, Bosson JK, Cohen D, Burnaford RM, Weaver JR. 2008. Precarious manhood. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 95:1325–39 [Google Scholar]
  149. Vandello JA, Hettinger VE, Bosson JK, Siddiqi J. 2013. When equal isn't really equal: the masculine dilemma of seeking work flexibility. J. Soc. Issues 69:303–21 [Google Scholar]
  150. Van Steenbergen EF, Ellemers N. 2009. Is managing the work-family interface worthwhile? Benefits for employee health and performance. J. Organ. Behav. 30:616–42 [Google Scholar]
  151. Wayne JH, Casper WJ, Matthews RA, Allen TD. 2013. Family-supportive organization perceptions and organizational commitment: the mediating role of work-family conflict and enrichment and partner attitudes. J. Appl. Psychol. 98:4606–22 [Google Scholar]
  152. Wayne JH, Musisca N, Fleeson W. 2004. Considering the role of personality in the work-family experience: relationships of the Big Five to work-family conflict and facilitation. J. Vocat. Behav. 64:108–30 [Google Scholar]
  153. Wayne JH, Randel AE, Stevens J. 2006. The role of identity and work-family support in work-family enrichment and its work-related consequences. J. Vocat. Behav. 69:445–61 [Google Scholar]
  154. Weer CH, Greenhaus JH, Linnehan F. 2010. Commitment to nonwork roles and job performance: enrichment and conflict perspectives. J. Vocat. Behav. 76:306–16 [Google Scholar]
  155. Williams A, Franche R-L, Ibrahim S, Mustard C, Layton FR. 2006. Examining the relationship between work-family spillover and sleep quality. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 11:27–37 [Google Scholar]
  156. Williams JC. 2000. Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What To Do About It New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  157. Williams JC. 2010. Reshaping the Work-Family Debate: Why Men and Class Matter Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  158. Williams JC, Blair-Loy M, Berdahl JL. 2013. Cultural schemas, social class, and the flexibility stigma. J. Soc. Issues 69:209–34 [Google Scholar]
  159. Williams JC, Boushey H. 2010. Three faces of work-family conflict: the poor, the professionals, and the missing middle. San Francisco: Univ. Calif. Hastings Coll. Law, Cent. WorkLife Law http://www.worklifelaw.org/pubs/ThreeFacesofWork-FamilyConflict.pdf [Google Scholar]
  160. Williams JC, Dempsey R. 2014. What Works for Women at Work: Four Patterns Working Women Need to Know New York: NYU Press [Google Scholar]
  161. Williams JC, Phillips K, Hall ER. 2015a. Double jeopardy: gender bias against women in STEM. San. Francisco: Univ. Calif. Hastings Coll. Law, Cent. WorkLife Law http://www.toolsforchangeinstem.org/tools/double-jeopardy-report [Google Scholar]
  162. Williams JC, Platt A, Lee J. 2015b. Disruptive innovation: new models of legal practice. San Francisco: Univ. Calif. Hastings Coll. Law, Cent. WorkLife Law http://worklifelaw.org/new-models-report/ [Google Scholar]
  163. Zedeck S. 1992. Work, Families, and Organizations: Frontiers of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 5 San Francisco: Jossey-Bass [Google Scholar]
  164. Zedeck S, Mosier KL. 1990. Work in the family and employing organization. Am. Psychol. 45:240–51 [Google Scholar]
  165. Zuo J. 2004. Shifting the breadwinning boundary: the role of men's breadwinner status and their gender ideologies. J. Fam. Issues 25:811–32 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033710
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error