This article reviews research from several behavioral disciplines to derive strategies for prompting people to perform behaviors that are individually costly and provide negligible individual or social benefits but are meaningful when performed by a large number of individuals. Whereas the term social influence encompasses all the ways in which people influence other people, social mobilization refers specifically to principles that can be used to influence a large number of individuals to participate in such activities. The motivational force of social mobilization is amplified by the fact that others benefit from the encouraged behaviors, and its overall impact is enhanced by the fact that people are embedded within social networks. This article may be useful to those interested in the provision of public goods, collective action, and prosocial behavior, and we give special attention to field experiments on election participation, environmentally sustainable behaviors, and charitable giving.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Literature Cited

  1. Addonizio EM, Green DP, Glaser JM. 2007. Putting the party back into politics: an experiment testing whether election day festivals increase voter turnout. PS Polit. Sci. Polit. 40:4721–27 [Google Scholar]
  2. Agerström J, Carlsson R, Nicklasson L, Guntell L. 2016. Using descriptive social norms to increase charitable giving: the power of local norms. J. Econ. Psychol. 52:147–53 [Google Scholar]
  3. Allcott H. 2011. Social norms and energy conservation. J. Public Econ. 95:91082–95 [Google Scholar]
  4. Allcott H, Rogers T. 2014. The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: experimental evidence from energy conservation. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:103003–37 [Google Scholar]
  5. Alpizar F, Carlsson F, Johansson-Stenman O. 2008. Anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity: evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica. J. Public Econ. 92:51047–60 [Google Scholar]
  6. Amanatullah ET, Morris MW. 2010. Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women's fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 98:2256–67 [Google Scholar]
  7. Anderson LR, Holt CA. 1997. Information cascades in the laboratory. Am. Econ. Rev. 87:5847–62 [Google Scholar]
  8. Andreoni J, Rao JM, Trachtman H. 2011. Avoiding the ask: a field experiment on altruism, empathy, and charitable giving. NBER Work. Pap. w17648
  9. Aral S, Walker D. 2012. Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks. Science 337:6092337–41 [Google Scholar]
  10. Aral S, Walker D. 2014. Tie strength, embeddedness, and social influence: a large-scale networked experiment. Manag. Sci. 60:61352–70 [Google Scholar]
  11. Ariely D, Bracha A, Meier S. 2009. Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Am. Econ. Rev. 99:1544–55 [Google Scholar]
  12. Asensio OI, Delmas MA. 2015. Nonprice incentives and energy conservation. PNAS 112:6E510–15 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ayres I, Raseman S, Shih A. 2013. Evidence from two large field experiments that peer comparison feedback can reduce residential energy usage. J. Law Econ. Organ. 29:5992–1022 [Google Scholar]
  14. Baca-Motes K, Brown A, Gneezy A, Keenan EA, Nelson LD. 2013. Commitment and behavior change: evidence from the field. J. Consum. Res. 39:51070–84 [Google Scholar]
  15. Balliet D. 2010. Communication and cooperation in social dilemmas: a meta-analytic review. J. Confl. Resolut. 54:139–57 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bateson M, Nettle D, Roberts G. 2006. Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biol. Lett. 2:3412–14 [Google Scholar]
  17. Batson CD, Kennedy CL, Nord L, Stocks EL, Fleming DA. et al. 2007. Anger at unfairness: Is it moral outrage?. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 37:1272–85 [Google Scholar]
  18. Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Finkenauer C, Vohs KD. 2001. Bad is stronger than good. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 5:4323–70 [Google Scholar]
  19. Baumeister RF, Leary MR. 1995. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol. Bull. 117:3497–529 [Google Scholar]
  20. Belk RW. 1988. Possessions and the extended self. J. Consum. Res. 15:2139–68 [Google Scholar]
  21. Berger J, Heath C. 2008. Who drives divergence? Identity signaling, outgroup dissimilarity, and the abandonment of cultural tastes. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 95:3593–607 [Google Scholar]
  22. Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I. 1998. Learning from the behavior of others: confirmity, fads, and informational cascades. J. Econ. Perspect. 12:3151–70 [Google Scholar]
  23. Bond RM, Fariss CJ, Jones JJ, Kramer AD, Marlow C. et al. 2012. A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature 489:295–98 [Google Scholar]
  24. Bryan CJ, Walton GM, Dweck CS. 2016. Psychologically authentic versus inauthentic replication attempts. PNAS 113:43E6549–50 [Google Scholar]
  25. Bryan CJ, Walton GM, Rogers T, Dweck CS. 2011. Motivating voter turnout by invoking the self. PNAS 108:3112653–56 [Google Scholar]
  26. Burger JM. 1999. The foot-in-the-door compliance procedure: a multiple-process analysis and review. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 3:4303–25 [Google Scholar]
  27. Carr PB, Walton GM. 2014. Cues of working together fuel intrinsic motivation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 53:169–84 [Google Scholar]
  28. Centola D. 2010. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science 329:59961194–97 [Google Scholar]
  29. Centola D. 2011. An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior. Science 334:60601269–72 [Google Scholar]
  30. Chartrand TL, Lakin JL. 2013. The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64:285–308 [Google Scholar]
  31. Chaudhuri A. 2011. Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: a selective survey of the literature. Exp. Econ. 14:147–83 [Google Scholar]
  32. Christakis NA, Fowler JH. 2009. Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives Boston: Back Bay Books
  33. Cialdini RB. 2003. Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 12:4105–9 [Google Scholar]
  34. Cialdini RB. 2008. Influence: Science and Practice Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 5th ed..
  35. Cialdini RB, Demaine LJ, Sagarin BJ, Barrett DW, Rhoads K, Winter PL. 2006. Managing social norms for persuasive impact. Soc. Influ. 1:13–15 [Google Scholar]
  36. Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ. 2004. Social influence: compliance and conformity. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55:591–621 [Google Scholar]
  37. Cialdini RB, Reno RR, Kallgren CA. 1990. A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 58:61015–26 [Google Scholar]
  38. Cialdini RB, Trost MR. 1998. Social influence: social norms, conformity, and compliance. The Handbook of Social Psychology DT Gilbert, ST Fiske, G Lindzey 151–92 Boston: McGraw-Hill, 4th ed.. [Google Scholar]
  39. Cialdini RB, Trost MR, Newsom JT. 1995. Preference for consistency: the development of a valid measure and the discovery of surprising behavioral implications. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 69:2318–28 [Google Scholar]
  40. Coleman JS. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Sociol. 94:S95–120 [Google Scholar]
  41. Contractor NS, DeChurch LA. 2014. Integrating social networks and human social motives to achieve social influence at scale. PNAS 111:Suppl. 413650–57 [Google Scholar]
  42. Cryder CE, Loewenstein G, Scheines R. 2013. The donor is in the details. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 120:115–23 [Google Scholar]
  43. Dana J, Cain DM, Dawes RM. 2006. What you don't know won't hurt me: costly (but quiet) exit in dictator games. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 100:2193–201 [Google Scholar]
  44. Dawes RM. 1980. Social dilemmas. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 31:169–93 [Google Scholar]
  45. de Groot JIM, Abrahamse W, Jones K. 2013. Persuasive normative messages: the influence of injunctive and personal norms on using free plastic bags. Sustainability 5:51829–44 [Google Scholar]
  46. DellaVigna S, List J, Malmendier U. 2012. Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. Q. J. Econ. 127:11–56 [Google Scholar]
  47. DellaVigna S, List JA, Malmendier U, Rao G. 2017. Voting to tell others. Rev. Econ. Stud. 84:1143–81 [Google Scholar]
  48. Delmas MA, Lessem N. 2014. Saving power to conserve your reputation? The effectiveness of private versus public information. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 67:3353–70 [Google Scholar]
  49. Delmas MA, Vezich SI, Goldstein NJ. 2017. Better than average or worse than the best? Unpacking peer influences in residential energy use feedback Work. Pap., Inst. Environ. Sustain Univ. Calif. Los Angeles:
  50. Dickerson CA, Thibodeau R, Aronson E, Miller D. 1992. Using cognitive dissonance to encourage water conservation. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 22:11841–54 [Google Scholar]
  51. Dolinski D, Nawrat M, Rudak I. 2001. Dialogue involvement as a social influence technique. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 27:111395–406 [Google Scholar]
  52. Drolet AL, Morris MW. 2000. Rapport in conflict resolution: accounting for how face-to-face contact fosters mutual cooperation in mixed-motive conflicts. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 36:126–50 [Google Scholar]
  53. Everett JW, Peirce JJ. 1992. Social networks, socioeconomic status, and environmental collective action: residential curbside block leader recycling. J. Environ. Syst. 21:165–84 [Google Scholar]
  54. Ferraro PJ, Price MK. 2013. Using nonpecuniary strategies to influence behavior: evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Rev. Econ. Stat. 95:164–73 [Google Scholar]
  55. Fischbacher U, Gächter S. 2010. Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public goods experiments. Am. Econ. Rev. 100:1541–56 [Google Scholar]
  56. Fischbacher U, Gächter S, Fehr E. 2001. Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Econ. Lett. 71:3397–404 [Google Scholar]
  57. Flynn FJ, Lake VK. 2008. If you need help, just ask: underestimating compliance with direct requests for help. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 95:1128–43 [Google Scholar]
  58. Foulon J, Lanoie P, Laplante B. 2002. Incentives for pollution control: regulation or information?. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 44:1169–87 [Google Scholar]
  59. Freedman JL, Fraser SC. 1966. Compliance without pressure: the foot-in-the-door technique. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 4:2195–202 [Google Scholar]
  60. Frey BS, Meier S. 2004. Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: testing “conditional cooperation” in a field experiment. Am. Econ. Rev. 94:51717–22 [Google Scholar]
  61. Funk P. 2010. Social incentives and voter turnout: evidence from the Swiss mail ballot system. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 8:51077–103 [Google Scholar]
  62. Gehlbach H, Brinkworth ME, King AM, Hsu LM, McIntyre J, Rogers T. 2016. Creating birds of similar feathers: leveraging similarity to improve teacher-student relationships and academic achievement. J. Educ. Psychol. 108:3342–52 [Google Scholar]
  63. Genevsky A, Västfjäll D, Slovic P, Knutson B. 2013. Neural underpinnings of the identifiable victim effect: Affect shifts preferences for giving. J. Neurosci. 33:4317188–96 [Google Scholar]
  64. Gerber A, Green D. 2000. The effects of canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: a field experiment. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 94:3653–63 [Google Scholar]
  65. Gerber AS, Green DP, Larimer CW. 2010. An experiment testing the relative effectiveness of encouraging voter participation by inducing feelings of pride or shame. Polit. Behav. 32:3409–22 [Google Scholar]
  66. Gerber AS, Huber GA, Biggers DR, Hendry DJ. 2016. A field experiment shows that subtle linguistic cues might not affect voter behavior. PNAS 113:267112–17 [Google Scholar]
  67. Gerber AS, Rogers T. 2009. Descriptive social norms and motivation to vote: Everybody's voting and so should you. J. Polit. 71:1178–91 [Google Scholar]
  68. Goldstein NJ, Cialdini RB. 2007. The spyglass self: a model of vicarious self-perception. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 92:3402–17 [Google Scholar]
  69. Goldstein NJ, Cialdini RB, Griskevicius V. 2008. A room with a viewpoint: using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J. Consum. Res. 35:3472–82 [Google Scholar]
  70. Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V, Cialdini RB. 2011. Reciprocity by proxy: a novel influence strategy for stimulating cooperation. Adm. Sci. Q. 56:3441–73 [Google Scholar]
  71. Gouldner AW. 1960. The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. Am. Sociol. Rev. 25:2161–78 [Google Scholar]
  72. Grant AM, Campbell EM, Chen G, Cottone K, Lapedis D, Lee K. 2007. Impact and the art of motivation maintenance: the effects of contact with beneficiaries on persistence behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 103:153–67 [Google Scholar]
  73. Graziano M, Gillingham K. 2015. Spatial patterns of solar photovoltaic system adoption: the influence of neighbors and the built environment. J. Econ. Geogr. 15:4815–39 [Google Scholar]
  74. Green DP, McGrath MC, Aronow PM. 2013. Field experiments and the study of voter turnout. J. Elections Public Opin. Parties 23:127–48 [Google Scholar]
  75. Greenwald AG, Carnot CG, Beach R, Young B. 1987. Increasing voting behavior by asking people if they expect to vote. J. Appl. Psychol. 72:2315–18 [Google Scholar]
  76. Griskevicius V, Tybur JM, Van den Bergh B. 2010. Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 98:3392–404 [Google Scholar]
  77. Haley KJ, Fessler DM. 2005. Nobody's watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evol. Hum. Behav. 26:3245–56 [Google Scholar]
  78. Harbaugh WT. 1998. The prestige motive for making charitable transfers. Am. Econ. Rev. 88:2277–82 [Google Scholar]
  79. Hirschman AO. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  80. Jacobson RP, Mortensen CR, Cialdini RB. 2011. Bodies obliged and unbound: differentiated response tendencies for injunctive and descriptive social norms. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 100:3433–48 [Google Scholar]
  81. Jasper JM. 2011. Emotions and social movements: twenty years of theory and research. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 37:285–303 [Google Scholar]
  82. Kantola SJ, Syme GJ, Campbell NA. 1984. Cognitive dissonance and energy conservation. J. Appl. Psychol. 69:3416–21 [Google Scholar]
  83. Karlan D, McConnell MA. 2014. Hey look at me: the effect of giving circles on giving. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 106:402–12 [Google Scholar]
  84. Keane LD, Nickerson DW. 2015. When reports depress rather than inspire: a field experiment using age cohorts as reference groups. J. Polit. Mark. 14:4381–90 [Google Scholar]
  85. Keltner D, Kogan A, Piff PK, Saturn SR. 2014. The sociocultural appraisals, values, and emotions (SAVE) framework of prosociality: core processes from gene to meme. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 65:425–60 [Google Scholar]
  86. Kessler JB, Milkman KL. 2017. Identity in charitable giving. Manag. Sci. In press
  87. Kogut T, Ritov I. 2005. The “identified victim” effect: an identified group, or just a single individual?. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 18:3157–67 [Google Scholar]
  88. Kraft-Todd G, Yoeli E, Bhanot S, Rand D. 2015. Promoting cooperation in the field. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 3:96–101 [Google Scholar]
  89. Krupka EL, Croson RT. 2016. The differential impact of social norms cues on charitable contributions. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 128:149–58 [Google Scholar]
  90. Leary MR. 2007. Motivational and emotional aspects of the self. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58:317–44 [Google Scholar]
  91. Leary MR, Baumeister RF. 2000. The nature and function of self-esteem: sociometer theory. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 32:1–62 [Google Scholar]
  92. LeBoeuf RA, Shafir E, Bayuk JB. 2010. The conflicting choices of alternating selves. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 111:148–61 [Google Scholar]
  93. Lerner JS, Tetlock PE. 1999. Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychol. Bull. 125:2255–75 [Google Scholar]
  94. Lipsitz A, Kallmeyer K, Ferguson M, Abas A. 1989. Counting on blood donors: increasing the impact of reminder calls. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 19:131057–67 [Google Scholar]
  95. Lohmann S. 1994. The dynamics of informational cascades: the Monday demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany, 1989–91. World Polit 47:142–101 [Google Scholar]
  96. Long J, Harré N, Atkinson QD. 2014. Understanding change in recycling and littering behavior across a school social network. Am. J. Community Psychol. 53:3–4462–74 [Google Scholar]
  97. Loock C, Landwehr J, Staake T, Fleisch E, Pentland A. 2012. The influence of reference frame and population density on the effectiveness of social normative feedback on electricity consumption Presented at Int. Conf. Inf. Syst Dec. 16–19 Orlando, FL:
  98. Lyons R. 2011. The spread of evidence-poor medicine via flawed social-network analysis. Stat. Polit. Policy 2:1 https:/doi.org/10.2202/2151-7509.1024 [Google Scholar]
  99. MacDonald G, Leary MR. 2005. Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. Psychol. Bull. 131:2202–23 [Google Scholar]
  100. Malhotra N, Michelson MR, Rogers T, Valenzuela AA. 2011. Text messages as mobilization tools: the conditional effect of habitual voting and election salience. Am. Polit. Res. 39:4664–81 [Google Scholar]
  101. Martin S. 2012. 98% of HBR readers love this article. Harvard Business Review Oct. https://hbr.org/2012/10/98-of-hbr-readers-love-this-article [Google Scholar]
  102. McClelland DC. 1985. Human Motivation Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman
  103. Meeker D, Linder JA, Fox CR, Friedberg MW, Persell SD. et al. 2016. Effect of behavioral interventions on inappropriate antibiotic prescribing among primary care practices: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 315:6562–70 [Google Scholar]
  104. Milkman KL, Rogers T, Bazerman MH. 2009. Highbrow films gather dust: time-inconsistent preferences and online DVD rentals. Manag. Sci. 55:61047–59 [Google Scholar]
  105. Miller DT, Prentice DA. 2016. Changing norms to change behavior. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 67:339–61 [Google Scholar]
  106. Montada L, Schneider A. 1989. Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged. Soc. Justice Res. 3:4313–44 [Google Scholar]
  107. Morwitz VG, Johnson E, Schmittlein D. 1993. Does measuring intent change behavior?. J. Consum. Res. 20:146–61 [Google Scholar]
  108. Nickerson DW. 2007. Does email boost turnout?. Q. J. Polit. Sci. 2:4369–80 [Google Scholar]
  109. Nickerson DW. 2008. Is voting contagious? Evidence from two field experiments. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 102:149–57 [Google Scholar]
  110. Nickerson DW, Rogers T. 2010. Do you have a voting plan? Implementation intentions, voter turnout, and organic plan making. Psychol. Sci. 21:2194–99 [Google Scholar]
  111. Nolan JM, Schultz PW, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V. 2008. Normative social influence is underdetected. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34:7913–23 [Google Scholar]
  112. Norton MI, Dunn EW, Carney DR, Ariely D. 2012. The persuasive “power” of stigma?. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 117:2261–68 [Google Scholar]
  113. Nowak MA, Sigmund K. 1998. Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature 393:6685573–77 [Google Scholar]
  114. Olson M. 1965. Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  115. Ostrom E. 1998. A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: presidential address, American Political Science Association, 1997.. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 92:11–22 [Google Scholar]
  116. Ostrom E. 2014. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J. Nat. Resourc. Policy Res. 6:4235–52 [Google Scholar]
  117. Páez D, Rimé B, Basabe N, Wlodarczyk A, Zumeta L. 2015. Psychosocial effects of perceived emotional synchrony in collective gatherings. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 108:5711–29 [Google Scholar]
  118. Pallak MS, Cummings W. 1976. Commitment and voluntary energy conservation. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2:127–30 [Google Scholar]
  119. Paluck EL, Shepherd H, Aronow PM. 2016. Changing climates of conflict: a social network experiment in 56 schools. PNAS 113:3566–71 [Google Scholar]
  120. Panagopoulos C. 2010. Affect, social pressure and prosocial motivation: field experimental evidence of the mobilizing effects of pride, shame and publicizing voting behavior. Polit. Behav. 32:3369–86 [Google Scholar]
  121. Panagopoulos C. 2013. Positive social pressure and prosocial motivation: evidence from a large‐scale field experiment on voter mobilization. Polit. Psychol. 34:2265–75 [Google Scholar]
  122. Panagopoulos C. 2014. I've got my eyes on you: implicit social‐pressure cues and prosocial behavior. Polit. Psychol. 35:123–33 [Google Scholar]
  123. Penner LA, Dovidio JF, Piliavin JA, Schroeder DA. 2005. Prosocial behavior: multilevel perspectives. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 56:365–92 [Google Scholar]
  124. Petty R, Caccioppo J. 2012. Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change New York: Springer
  125. Polletta F, Jasper JM. 2001. Collective identity and social movements. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27:283–305 [Google Scholar]
  126. Reams MA, Ray BH. 1993. The effects of three prompting methods on recycling participation rates: a field study. J. Environ. Syst. 22:371–79 [Google Scholar]
  127. Reingen PH. 1982. Test of a list procedure for inducing compliance with a request to donate money. J. Appl. Psychol. 67:1110–18 [Google Scholar]
  128. Rogers T, Feller A. 2016. Discouraged by peer excellence: exposure to exemplary peer performance causes quitting. Psychol. Sci. 27:3365–74 [Google Scholar]
  129. Rogers T, Feller A. 2017. Intervening through influential third parties: reducing student absences at scale via parents Work. Pap., John F. Kennedy Sch. Gov., Harvard Univ Cambridge, MA:
  130. Rogers T, Green DP, Ternovski J, Young CF. 2017. Social pressure and voting: a field experiment conducted in a high-salience election. Elect. Stud. 46:87–100 [Google Scholar]
  131. Rogers T, Ternovski J, Yoeli E. 2016. Potential follow-up increases private contributions to public goods. PNAS 113:195218–20 [Google Scholar]
  132. Samuelson PA. 1954. The pure theory of public expenditure. Rev. Econ. Stat. 36:4387–89 [Google Scholar]
  133. Schultz PW. 2014. Strategies for promoting proenvironmental behavior. Eur. Psychol. 19:2107–17 [Google Scholar]
  134. Schultz PW, Estrada M, Schmitt J, Sokoloski R, Silva-Send N. 2015. Using in-home displays to provide smart meter feedback about household electricity consumption: a randomized control trial comparing kilowatts, cost, and social norms. Energy 90:1351–58 [Google Scholar]
  135. Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V. 2007. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol. Sci. 18:5429–34 [Google Scholar]
  136. Schwartz D, Fischhoff B, Krishnamurti T, Sowell F. 2013. The Hawthorne effect and energy awareness. PNAS 110:3815242–46 [Google Scholar]
  137. Scott CA. 1977. Modifying socially-conscious behavior: the foot-in-the-door technique. J. Consum. Res. 4:3156–64 [Google Scholar]
  138. Shang J, Reed A, Croson R. 2008. Identity congruency effects on donations. J. Mark. Res. 45:3351–61 [Google Scholar]
  139. Sherman SJ. 1980. On the self-erasing nature of errors of prediction. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 39:2211–21 [Google Scholar]
  140. Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG. 2007. The affect heuristic. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 177:31333–52 [Google Scholar]
  141. Small DA, Loewenstein G. 2003. Helping a victim or helping the victim: altruism and identifiability. J. Risk Uncertain. 26:15–16 [Google Scholar]
  142. Smith JK, Gerber AS, Orlich A. 2003. Self‐prophecy effects and voter turnout: an experimental replication. Polit. Psychol. 24:3593–604 [Google Scholar]
  143. Smolowe J. 1990. Contents require immediate attention. Time Magazine 64, Nov. 26
  144. Steinert-Threlkeld ZC. 2017. Spontaneous collective action: peripheral mobilization during the Arab Spring. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 111:2379–403 [Google Scholar]
  145. Steinert-Threlkeld ZC, Mocanu D, Vespignani V, Fowler J. 2015. Online social networks and offline protest. EPJ Data Sci 4:19 [Google Scholar]
  146. Swann WB, Bosson JK. 2010. Self and identity. Handbook of Social Psychology DT Gilbert, ST Fiske, G Lindzey 589–628 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  147. Tajfel H, Turner JC. 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations WG Austin, S Worchel 33–37 Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole [Google Scholar]
  148. Tracy JL, Robins RW, Tangney JP. 2007. The Self-Conscious Emotions: Theory and Research New York: Guilford Press
  149. Tybout AM, Yalch RF. 1980. The effect of experience: a matter of salience?. J. Consum. Res. 6:4406–13 [Google Scholar]
  150. van Zomeren M, Postmes T, Spears R. 2008. Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychol. Bull. 134:4504–35 [Google Scholar]
  151. Weber JM, Kopelman S, Messick DM. 2004. A conceptual review of decision making in social dilemmas: applying a logic of appropriateness. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 8:3281–307 [Google Scholar]
  152. Werner CM, Turner J, Shipman K, Twitchell FS, Dickson BR. et al. 1995. Commitment, behavior, and attitude change: an analysis of voluntary recycling. J. Environ. Psychol. 15:3197–208 [Google Scholar]
  153. White K, Dahl DW. 2006. To be or not be? The influence of dissociative reference groups on consumer preferences. J. Consum. Psychol. 16:4404–14 [Google Scholar]
  154. White K, Simpson B. 2013. When do (and don't) normative appeals influence sustainable consumer behaviors?. J. Mark. 77:278–95 [Google Scholar]
  155. Yoeli E, Hoffman M, Rand DG, Nowak MA. 2013. Powering up with indirect reciprocity in a large-scale field experiment. PNAS 110:Suppl. 210424–29 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error