1932

Abstract

Conspiracy theories are a constant feature of human society but have recently risen in prominence with the flurry of COVID-19 conspiracy theories and their public display in social media. Conspiracy theories should be studied not only because of their potential harm but also because they are related to other sources of misinformation such as folk theories, rumors, and fake news. Recent understanding of their spread has shifted the focus from investigating the believers to characteristics of the social processes that motivate and persuade, with a new view of the conspiracy theorist as a bricoleur dealing with threats through social (re)construction of reality. These tendencies are strengthened by the markets for attention and approval constructed by social media platforms, and bots also amplify them. We identify an agenda of multiple important and urgent paths for future research that will help understanding of conspiracy theories in society.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-030222-031142
2024-08-12
2025-02-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/50/1/annurev-soc-030222-031142.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-030222-031142&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abbott A, Tsay A. 2000.. Sequence analysis and optimal matching methods in sociology: review and prospect. . Sociol. Methods Res. 29::333
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adorno TW. 1950.. The Authoritarian Personality. New York:: Norton
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Allington D, Duffy B, Wessely S, Dhavan N, Rubin J. 2021.. Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency. . Psychol. Med. 51::176369
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  4. Allport GW, Postman L. 1947.. The Psychology of Rumor. New York:: Henry Holt
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson RM, May RM. 1992.. Infectious Diseases of Humans: Dynamics and Control. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bail C. 2021.. Breaking the Social Media Prism: How to Make Our Platforms Less Polarizing. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bail CA, Argyle LP, Brown TW, Bumpus JP, Chen H, et al. 2018.. Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. . PNAS 115::921621
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barkun M. 2003.. The nature of conspiracy belief. . In A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America, ed. M Barkun , pp. 114. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Barnett WP, Woywode M. 2004.. From Red Vienna to the Anschluss: ideological competition among Viennese newspapers during the rise of national socialism. . Am. J. Sociol. 109::145299
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  10. Barron D, Furnham A, Weis L, Morgan KD, Towell T, Swami V. 2018.. The relationship between schizotypal facets and conspiracist beliefs via cognitive processes. . Psychiatry Res. 259::1520
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bartels DM, Medin DL. 2007.. Are morally motivated decision makers insensitive to the consequences of their choices?. Psychol. Sci. 18::2428
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  12. Becker J, Porter E, Centola D. 2019.. The wisdom of partisan crowds. . PNAS 116::1071722
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bell D, Bennion-Nixon L-J. 2001.. The popular culture of conspiracism/the conspiracy of popular culture. . In The Age of Anxiety: Conspiracy Theory and the Human Sciences, ed. J Parish, M Parker , pp. 13352. Oxford, UK:: Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Benkler Y, Faris R, Roberts H. 2018.. Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Berg JM. 2022.. One-hit wonders versus hit makers: sustaining success in creative industries. . Adm. Sci. Q. 67:(3):63073
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bierwiaczonek K, Kunst JR, Pich O. 2020.. Belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories reduces social distancing over time. . Appl. Psychol. Health Well-Being 12:(4):127085
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bordia P, DiFonzo N. 2004.. Problem solving in social interactions on the Internet: rumor as social cognition. . Soc. Psychol. Q. 67::3349
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  18. Brotherton R, French CC. 2014.. Belief in conspiracy theories and susceptibility to the conjunction fallacy. . Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 28::23848
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  19. Butter M, Knight P. 2020.. Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories. London:: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Campion-Vincent V. 2005.. From evil others to evil elites: a dominant pattern in conspiracy theories today. . In Rumor Mills: The Social Impact of Rumor and Legend, ed. GA Fine, V Campion-Vincent, C Heath , pp. 10322. New Brunswick, NJ:: Aldine/Transaction
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Carlson J, Ramo E. 2022.. “I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but…”: knowledge and conservative politics in unsettled times. . Soc. Forces 101::165881
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  22. Carro A, Toral R, San Miguel M. 2016.. The noisy voter model on complex networks. . Sci. Rep. 6::24775
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  23. Casara BGS, Suitner C, Jetten J. 2022.. The impact of economic inequality on conspiracy beliefs. . J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 98::104245
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  24. Centola DM. 2013.. Homophily, networks, and critical mass: solving the start-up problem in large group collective action. . Rationality Soc. 25::340
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  25. Chan M-PS, Jamieson KH, Albarracin D. 2020.. Prospective associations of regional social media messages with attitudes and actual vaccination: a big data and survey study of the influenza vaccine in the United States. . Vaccine 38::623647
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  26. Clarke S. 2007.. Conspiracy theories and the Internet: controlled demolition and arrested development. . Episteme 4::16780
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  27. Colleoni E, Rozza A, Arvidsson A. 2014.. Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data. . J. Commun. 64::31732
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  28. DiFonzo N. 2018.. Conspiracy rumor psychology. . In Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them, ed. JE Uscinski , pp. 25768. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  29. DiMaggio PJ. 1997.. Culture and cognition. . Annu. Rev. Sociol. 23::26387
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  30. Douglas KM, Leite AC. 2017.. Suspicion in the workplace: organizational conspiracy theories and work-related outcomes. . Br. J. Psychol. 108::486506
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  31. Douglas KM, Sutton RM. 2023.. What are conspiracy theories? A definitional approach to their correlates, consequences, and communication. . Annu. Rev. Psychol. 74::27198
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  32. Douglas KM, Uscinski JE, Sutton RM, Cichocka A, Nefes T, et al. 2019.. Understanding conspiracy theories. . Political Psychol. 40::335
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  33. Drochon H. 2018.. Who believes in conspiracy theories in Great Britain and Europe. . In Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them, ed. JE Uscinski , pp. 33746. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Dutta S, Rao H. 2015.. Infectious diseases, contamination rumors and ethnic violence: regimental mutinies in the Bengal Native Army in 1857 India. . Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 129::3647
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  35. Easley D, Kleinberg J. 2010.. Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning About a Highly Connected World. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Enders AM, Smallpage SM. 2018.. On the measurement of conspiracy beliefs. . Res. Politics 5:(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018763596
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  37. Farkas J, Schou J. 2018.. Fake news as a floating signifier: hegemony, antagonism and the politics of falsehood. . Javnost Public 25::298314
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ferrara E. 2017.. Disinformation and social bot operations in the run up to the 2017 French presidential election. . First Monday 22:(8). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i8.8005
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Fine GA, Ellis B. 2010.. The Global Grapevine: Why Rumors of Terrorism, Immigration, and Trade Matter. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Franks B, Bangerter A, Bauer MW. 2013.. Conspiracy theories as quasi-religious mentality: an integrated account from cognitive science, social representations theory, and frame theory. . Front. Psychol. 4::424
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  41. Gerlach M, Peixoto TP, Altmann EG. 2018.. A network approach to topic models. . Sci. Adv. 4::eaaq1360
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  42. Goertzel T. 1994.. Belief in conspiracy theories. . Political Psychol. 15:(4):73142
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  43. Grant L, Hausman BL, Cashion M, Lucchesi N, Patel K, Roberts J. 2015.. Vaccination persuasion online: a qualitative study of two provaccine and two vaccine-skeptical websites. . J. Med. Internet Res. 17::e133
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  44. Greve HR, Rao H, Vicinanza P, Zhou EY. 2022.. Online conspiracy groups: micro-bloggers, bots, and coronavirus conspiracy talk on Twitter. . Am. Sociol. Rev. 87::91948
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  45. Guess AM. 2021.. (Almost) everything in moderation: new evidence on Americans' online media diets. . Am. J. Political Sci. 65::100722
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  46. Guilbeault D, Centola D. 2020.. Networked collective intelligence improves dissemination of scientific information regarding smoking risks. . PLOS ONE 15::e0227813
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  47. Harambam J, Aupers S. 2017.. ‘I am not a conspiracy theorist’: relational identifications in the Dutch conspiracy milieu. . Cultural Sociol. 11::11329
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  48. Heath C, Heath D. 2007.. Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die. New York:: Random House
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Heider F. 1958.. The naive analysis of action. . In The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, ed. F Heider , pp. 79124. New York:: Wiley
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Hellinger D. 2003.. Paranoia, conspiracy, and hegemony. . In Transparency and Conspiracy: Ethnographies of Suspicion in the New World Order, ed. HG West, T Sanders , pp. 20432. Durham, NC:: Duke Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Hilgartner S, Bosk CL. 1988.. The rise and fall of social problems: a public arenas model. . Am. J. Sociol. 94::5378
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  52. Hofstadter R. 1965.. The Paranoid Style in American Politics: And Other Essays. New York:: Alfred A. Knopf
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Imhoff R, Lamberty P. 2018.. How paranoid are conspiracy believers? Toward a more fine-grained understanding of the connect and disconnect between paranoia and belief in conspiracy theories. . Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 48::90926
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ingram P, Simons T. 2000.. State formation, ideological competition, and the ecology of Israeli workers' cooperatives, 1920–1992. . Adm. Sci. Q. 45::2553
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  55. Jolley D, Douglas KM. 2014.. The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. . PLOS ONE 9::e89177
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  56. Jolley D, Douglas KM, Marchlewska M, Cichocka A, Sutton RM. 2022.. Examining the links between conspiracy beliefs and the EU “Brexit” referendum vote in the UK: evidence from a two-wave survey. . J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 52::3036
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  57. Laine EE, Parakkal R. 2017.. National security, personal insecurity, and political conspiracies: the persistence of Americans' beliefs in 9/11 conspiracy theories. . IUP J. Int. Relat. 11:(3):1641
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Lebowitz JL, Saleur H. 1986.. Percolation in strongly correlated systems. . Physica A 138::194205
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  59. Ledwich M, Zaitsev A. 2019.. Algorithmic extremism: examining YouTube's rabbit hole of radicalization. . arXiv:1912.11211 [cs.SI]
  60. Leskovec J, Lang KJ, Mahoney M. 2010.. Empirical comparison of algorithms for network community detection. Presented at 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, Raleigh, NC:, April 26–30
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Leveaux S, Nera K, Fagnoni P, Klein PP. 2022.. Defining and explaining conspiracy theories: comparing the lay representations of conspiracy believers and non-believers. . J. Soc. Political Psychol. 10::33552
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  62. Levi-Strauss C. 1962.. The Savage Mind. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Lowenthal L, Guterman N. 1949.. Prophets of Deceit: A Study of the Techniques of the American Agitator. New York:: Harper and Brothers
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Malle BF, Guglielmo S, Monroe AE. 2014.. A theory of blame. . Psychol. Inquiry 25::14786
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  65. Moore A. 2018.. Conspiracies, conspiracy theories and democracy. . Political Stud. Rev. 16::212
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  66. Moscovici S. 1994.. Social representations and pragmatic communication. . Soc. Sci. Inf. 33::16377
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  67. Munger K, Phillips J. 2022.. Right-wing YouTube: a supply and demand perspective. . Int. J. Press/Politics 27::186219
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  68. Nefes TS. 2013.. Political parties' perceptions and uses of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories in Turkey. . Sociol. Rev. 61::24764
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  69. Oliver JE, Wood TJ. 2014.. Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion. . Am. J. Political Sci. 58::95266
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  70. Oliver PE, Myers DJ. 1999.. How events enter the public sphere: conflict, location, and sponsorship in local newspaper coverage of public events. . Am. J. Sociol. 105::3887
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  71. Olmsted KS. 2011.. The truth is out there: citizen sleuths from the Kennedy assassination to the 9/11 truth movement. . Diplomatic Hist. 35::67193
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  72. Osmundsen M, Bor A, Vahlstrup PB, Bechmann A, Petersen MB. 2021.. Partisan polarization is the primary psychological motivation behind political fake news sharing on Twitter. . Am. Political Sci. Rev. 115::9991015
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  73. Paudel P, Blackburn J, De Cristofaro E, Zannettou S, Stringhini G. 2021.. Soros, child sacrifices, and 5G: understanding the spread of conspiracy theories on web communities. . arXiv:2111.02187 [cs.SI]
  74. Prasad J. 1935.. The psychology of rumour: a study relating to the great Indian earthquake of 1934. . Br. J. Psychol. 26::115
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Prooijen J-W. 2018.. The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories. London:: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Raab MH, Ortlieb SA, Auer N, Guthmann K, Carbon C-C. 2013.. Thirty shades of truth: conspiracy theories as stories of individuation, not of pathological delusion. . Front. Psychol. 4::406
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Rao H, Dutta S. 2012.. Free spaces as organizational weapons of the weak: religious festivals and regimental mutinies in the 1857 Bengal Native Army. . Adm. Sci. Q. 57::62568
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  78. Rogers EM. 1995.. Diffusion of Innovations. New York:: Free Press. , 4th ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Romer D, Jamieson KH. 2020.. Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the US. . Soc. Sci. Med. 263::113356
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  80. Rosnow RL, Fine GA. 1976.. Rumor and Gossip: The Sociological Psychology of Hearsay. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Rosnow RL, Kimmel AJ. 2000.. Rumors. . In Encyclopedia of Psychology, Vol. 7, ed. AE Kazdin , pp. 12223. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Scott WR. 2001.. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA:: SAGE
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Shibutani T. 1966.. Improvised News: A Sociological Study of Rumor. New York:: Ardent
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Sunstein C. 2011.. Going to Extremes: How Like Minds Unite and Divide. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Swami V, Coles R, Stieger S, Pietschnig J, Furnham A, et al. 2011.. Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories. . Br. J. Psychol. 102::44363
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  86. Swidler A. 1986.. Cultures in action: symbols and strategies. . Am. Sociol. Rev. 51::27386
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  87. Swidler A. 2003.. Talk of Love: How Culture Matters. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Swift A. 2013.. Majority in U.S. still believe JFK killed in a conspiracy. . Gallup, Nov. 15. https://news.gallup.com/poll/165893/majority-believe-jfk-killed-conspiracy.aspx
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Tangherlini TR, Shahsavari S, Shahbazi B, Ebrahimzadeh E, Roychowdhury V. 2020.. An automated pipeline for the discovery of conspiracy and conspiracy theory narrative frameworks: Bridgegate, Pizzagate and storytelling on the web. . PLOS ONE 15::e0233879
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  90. Tavory I, Fine GA. 2020.. Disruption and the theory of the interaction order. . Theory Soc. 49::36585
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  91. Törnberg P. 2022.. How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting. . PNAS 119::e2207159119
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  92. Uscinski J, Enders A, Klofstad C, Seelig M, Drochon H, et al. 2022.. Have beliefs in conspiracy theories increased over time?. PLOS ONE 17::e0270429
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  93. Uscinski JE. 2018.. Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Uscinski JE, Parent JM. 2014.. American Conspiracy Theories. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Van Prooijen J-W, Douglas KM. 2017.. Conspiracy theories as part of history: the role of societal crisis situations. . Mem. Stud. 10::32333
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  96. Van Prooijen J-W, Douglas KM. 2018.. Belief in conspiracy theories: basic principles of an emerging research domain. . Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 48::897908
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  97. Van Prooijen J-W, Van Lange PA. 2014.. Power, Politics, and Paranoia: Why People are Suspicious of Their Leaders. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Vincent J. 2020.. Something in the air: conspiracy theorists say 5G causes novel coronavirus, so now they're harassing and attacking UK telecoms engineers. . The Verge, June 3. https://www.theverge.com/2020/6/3/21276912/5g-conspiracy-theories-coronavirus-uk-telecoms-engineers-attacks-abuse
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S. 2018.. The spread of true and false news online. . Science 359::114651
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  100. Wagner-Egger P, Bangerter A, Delouvée S, Dieguez S. 2022.. Awake together: sociopsychological processes of engagement in conspiracist communities. . Curr. Opin. Psychol. 47::101417
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  101. Wagner-Egger P, Delouvée S, Gauvrit N, Dieguez S. 2018.. Creationism and conspiracism share a common teleological bias. . Curr. Biol. 28::R86768
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  102. Walsh JP, Ungson GR. 1991.. Organizational memory. . Acad. Manag. Rev. 16::5791
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  103. Wood MJ, Douglas KM. 2013.. “ What about building 7?” A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories. . Front. Psychol. 4::409
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  104. Wood MJ, Douglas KM, Sutton RM. 2012.. Dead and alive: beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. . Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 3::76773
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  105. Yablokov I. 2018.. Fortress Russia: Conspiracy Theories in the Post-Soviet World. New York:: Wiley
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-030222-031142
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-030222-031142
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error