1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Sociology
  4. Volume 50, 2024
  5. Article

Annual Review of Sociology

Volume 50, 2024

Are Victims Virtuous or Vilified? The Stories We Tell Ourselves (and Each Other)

Abstract

Derogation of the victim refers to the tendency of an observer to negatively evaluate someone hurt by the action of another. Victim derogation has been a core feature of social psychology for decades, but evidence suggests this phenomenon is weakening. It may even be reversing into a valorization of victims. Is this empirical pattern due to methodological changes and shifts in theoretical framing of victim studies, or have there been large-scale cultural changes in how we view victims? This review outlines the theoretical and methodological origins of the derogation effect. It then discusses contemporary research streams that show the malleability of victim perception in research that considers the entire harmful social interaction. These studies suggest that shifts in broader social, political, and cultural environments may have impacted the social psychological foundations of derogation.

Keyword(s): attitudes, just world, morality, victim derogation, victimization
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-030222-032739
2024-08-12
2024-12-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/50/1/annurev-soc-030222-032739.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-030222-032739&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Alter AL, Kernochan J, Darley JM. 2007.. Morality influences how people apply the ignorance of the law defense. . Law Soc. Rev. 41:(4):819–64
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baldassarri D, Bearman P. 2007.. Dynamics of political polarization. . Am. Sociol. Rev. 72:(5):784–811
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barrett JL. 2000.. Exploring the natural foundations of religion. . Trends Cogn. Sci. 4:(1):29–34
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  4. Benford RD, Snow DA. 2000.. Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. . Annu. Rev. Sociol. 26::611–39
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bergsieker HB, Leslie LM, Constantine VS, Fiske ST. 2012.. Stereotyping by omission: eliminate the negative, accentuate the positive. . J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 102:(6):1214–38
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergstrand K, Jasper JM. 2018.. Villains, victims, and heroes in character theory and affect control theory. . Soc. Psychol. Q. 81:(3):228–47
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bishop B. 2008.. The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America is Tearing Us Apart. New York:: Houghton Mifflin
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bonilla T, Tillery AB. 2020.. Which identity frames boost support for and mobilization in the #BlackLivesMatter movement? An experimental test. . Am. Political Sci. Rev. 114:(4):947–62
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  9. Boutyline A, Vaisey S. 2017.. Belief network analysis: a relational approach to understanding the structure of attitudes. . Am. J. Sociol. 122:(5):1371–447
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bowler S, Nicholson SP. 2018.. Information cues and rational ignorance. . In The Oxford Handbook of Public Choice, ed. RD Congleton, B Grofman, S Voigt , pp. 381–94. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Boyd A, McEwan B. 2022.. Viral paradox: the intersection of “me too” and #MeToo. . New Media Soc. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221099187
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Boyle KM, Rogers KB. 2020.. Beyond the rape “victim”-“survivor” binary: how race, gender, and identity processes interact to shape distress. . Sociol. Forum 35:(2):323–45
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  13. Carlsmith KM, Darley JM, Robinson PH. 2002.. Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. . J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 83::284–99
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cerulo KA. 1998.. Deciphering Violence: The Cognitive Structure of Right and Wrong. London:: Taylor & Francis
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Clark AE, Kashima Y. 2007.. Stereotypes help people connect with others in the community: a situated functional analysis of the stereotype consistency bias in communication. . J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 93:(6):1028–39
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  16. Clark CJ, Chen EE, Ditto PH. 2015.. Moral coherence processes: constructing culpability and consequences. . Curr. Opin. Psychol. 6::123–28
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  17. Collins R. 1993.. What does conflict theory predict about America's future? 1993 presidential address. . Sociol. Perspect. 36:(4):289–313
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  18. Collins R. 2008.. Violence: A Micro-Sociological Theory. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Darley JM, Carlsmith KM, Robinson PH. 2000.. Incapacitation and just deserts as motives for punishment. . Law Hum. Behav. 24::659–83
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  20. Darley JM, Pittman TS. 2003.. The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. . Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 7:(4):324–36
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  21. Davis JL, Love TP. 2018.. Women who stay: a morality work perspective. . Soc. Problems 65:(2):251–65
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dawtry RJ, Mitchell JC, Harvey AJ, Gheorghiu AI. 2020.. Victims, vignettes, and videos: meta-analytic and experimental evidence that emotional impact enhances the derogation of innocent victims. . Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 24:(3):233–59
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  23. DellaPosta D, Shi Y, Macy M. 2015.. Why do liberals drink lattes?. Am. J. Sociol. 120:(5):1473–1511
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  24. DeScioli P, Gilbert SS, Kurzban R. 2012.. Indelible victims and persistent punishers in moral cognition. . Psychol. Inq. 23:(2):143–49
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  25. DiBennardo RA. 2018.. Ideal victims and monstrous offenders: how the news media represent sexual predators. . Socius 4:. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118802512
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dunn JL. 2004.. The politics of empathy: social movements and victim repertoires. . Sociol. Focus 37:(3):235–50
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  27. Evans-Pritchard EE. 1976 (1937).. Witchcraft, Oracles, and Magic Among the Azande. Oxford, UK:: Clarendon
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Fiske AP, Rai TS. 2015.. Virtuous Violence. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Fiske ST. 2018.. Stereotype content: warmth and competence endure. . Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 27:(2):67–73
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  30. Fiske ST, Taylor S. 1984.. Social Cognition. New York:: Random House
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Furnham A. 2003.. Belief in a just world: research progress over the past decade. . Personal. Individ. Differ. 34:(5):795–817
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  32. Genevsky A, Västfjäll D, Slovic P, Knutson B. 2013.. Neural underpinnings of the identifiable victim effect: affect shifts preferences for giving. . J. Neurosci. 33:(43):17188–96
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gengler AM. 2012.. Defying (dis)empowerment in a battered women's shelter: moral rhetorics, intersectionality, and processes of control and resistance. . Soc. Probl. 59:(4):501–21
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gorman SE, Gorman JM. 2017.. Denying to the Grave: Why We Ignore the Facts that Will Save Us. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Gray K. 2010.. Moral transformation: good and evil turn the weak into the mighty. . Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 1::253–58
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gray K, Schein C. 2011.. When your life is on the line, be a victim, not a hero. . Jury Expert 23::814
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Gray K, Schein C. 2012.. Two minds versus two philosophies: mind perception defines morality and dissolves the debate between deontology and utilitarianism. . Rev. Philos. Psychol. 3:(3):405–23
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  38. Gray K, Schein C, Ward AF. 2014.. The myth of harmless wrongs in moral cognition: automatic dyadic completion from sin to suffering. . J. Exp. Psychol. General 143:(4):1600–15
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  39. Gray K, Wegner DM. 2009.. Moral typecasting: divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. . J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 96:(3):505–20
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  40. Gray K, Wegner DM. 2011.. To escape blame, don't be a hero—be a victim. . J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 47::516–19
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hafer CL, Bègue L. 2005.. Experimental research on just-world theory: problems, developments, and future challenges. . Psychol. Bull. 131:(1):128–67
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  42. Haidt J. 2012.. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York:: Random House
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Heider F. 1958.. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York:: Wiley
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Heise DR. 2007.. Expressive Order: Confirming Sentiments in Social Actions. New York:: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Hersh E. 2020.. Politics is for Power: How to Move Beyond Political Hobbyism, Take Action, and Make Real Change. New York:: Simon & Schuster
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Higgins ET. 2019.. Shared Reality: What Makes Us Strong and Tears Us Apart. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Howells R. 2012.. The Myth of the Titanic. New York:: Palgrave/St. Martin's Press
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Hunzaker MBF. 2014.. Making sense of misfortune: cultural schemas, victim redefinition, and the perpetuation of stereotypes. . Soc. Psychol. Q. 77:(2):166–84
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  49. Hunzaker MBF. 2016.. Cultural sentiments and schema-consistency bias in information transmission. . Am. Sociol. Rev. 81:(6):1223–50
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  50. Iyengar S, Lelkes Y, Levendusky M, Malhotra N, Westwood SJ. 2019.. The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. . Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 22::129–46
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  51. Jacobs S, Quinn J. 2021.. Cultural reproduction of mental illness stigma and stereotypes. . Soc. Sci. Med. 292::114552
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  52. Jensen C, Petersen MB. 2017.. The deservingness heuristic and the politics of health care. . Am. J. Political Sci. 61:(1):68–83
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  53. Jordan JJ, Kouchaki M. 2021.. Virtuous victims. . Sci. Adv. 7:(42):eabg5902
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  54. Jost JT. 2017.. Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. . Political Psychol. 38:(2):167–208
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  55. Jost JT, Banaji MR. 1994.. The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. . Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 33:(1):1–27
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  56. Jost JT, Kay AC. 2005.. Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. . J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 88:(3):498509
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  57. Jost JT, van der Toorn J. 2012.. System justification theory. . In Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, Vol. 2, ed. PAM Van Lange, AW Kruglanski, ET Higgins , pp. 313–43. Thousand Oaks, CA:: SAGE
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Kelly C. 2022.. “The situation sounds sketchy”: institutional rule-breaking and a qualitative case for quantifying culture. . Am. Behav. Sci. 67:(2):290–310
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  59. Ketelaars P. 2016.. What strikes the responsive chord? The effects of framing qualities on frame resonance among protest participants. . Mobilization Int. Q. 21:(3):341–60
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  60. Kogut T, Ritov I. 2005.. The “identified victim” effect: an identified group, or just a single individual?. J. Behav. Decision Making 18:(3):157–67
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  61. Lee TL, Gelfand MJ, Kashima Y. 2014.. The serial reproduction of conflict: third parties escalate conflict through communication biases. . J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 54::68–72
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  62. Leisenring A. 2006.. Confronting “victim” discourses: the identity work of battered women. . Symbolic Interaction 29:(3):307–30
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  63. Lerner MJ. 1965.. Evaluation of performance as a function of performer's reward and attractiveness. . J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1::355–60
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  64. Lerner MJ. 1977.. The justice motive: some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. . J. Personal. 45:(1):1–52
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  65. Lerner MJ. 1980.. The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion. New York:: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Lerner MJ, Simmons CH. 1966.. Observer's reaction to the “innocent victim”: compassion or rejection?. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 4::203–10
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  67. Lyons A, Kashima Y. 2003.. How are stereotypes maintained through communication? The influence of stereotype sharedness. . J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 85:(6):989–1005
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  68. Maier SR, Slovic P, Mayorga M. 2017.. Reader reaction to news of mass suffering: assessing the influence of story form and emotional response. . Journalism 18:(8):1011–29
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  69. Mason L. 2018.. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  70. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. 2001.. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. . Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27::415–44
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  71. Mercier H, Sperber D. 2017.. The Enigma of Reason. Cambridge, MA:: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Nagle J. 2009.. The Ulster Unionist victims’ movement: political opportunities and injustice master-frames. . Irish J. Sociol. 17:(1):19–37
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  73. Nelson SM. 2006.. Redefining a bizarre situation: relative concept stability in affect control theory. . Soc. Psychol. Q. 69:(3):215–34
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  74. Niemi L, Young L. 2016.. When and why we see victims as responsible: the impact of ideology on attitudes toward victims. . Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 42:(9):1227–42
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  75. Ochoa NR. 2022.. Template matching and moral judgment: a new method and empirical test. . Poetics 92::101643
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  76. Okimoto TG, Wenzel M. 2008.. The symbolic meaning of transgressions: towards a unifying framework of justice restoration. . Justice 25::291–326
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  77. Okimoto TG, Wenzel M. 2011.. Third-party punishment and symbolic intragroup status. . J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 47:(4):709–18
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  78. Okimoto TG, Wenzel M, Feather NT. 2009.. Beyond retribution: conceptualizing restorative justice and exploring its determinants. . Soc. Justice Res. 22:(1):156–80
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  79. Okimoto TG, Wenzel M, Feather NT. 2012.. Retribution and restoration as general orientations towards justice. . Eur. J. Personal. 26:(3):255–75
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  80. Olick JK, Robbins J. 1998.. Social memory studies: from ‘collective memory’ to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices. . Annu. Rev. Sociol. 24::105–40
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  81. Persson S, Dhingra K. 2022.. Attributions of blame in stranger and acquaintance rape: a multilevel meta-analysis and systematic review. . Trauma Violence Abuse 23:(3):795–809
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  82. Rawlings CM. 2020.. Cognitive authority and the constraint of attitude change in groups. . Am. Sociol. Rev. 85:(6):992–1021
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  83. Rawlings CM, Childress C. 2019.. Emergent meanings: reconciling dispositional and situational accounts of meaning-making from cultural objects. . Am. J. Sociol. 124:(6):1763–1809
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  84. Rawlings CM, Childress C. 2024.. The polarization of popular culture: tracing the size, shape, and depth of the “oil spill. .” Soc. Forces 102:(4):1582607
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  85. Robinson DT, Smith-Lovin L. 2018.. Affect control theories of social interaction and self. . In Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, ed. PJ Burke , pp. 139–65. Stanford, CA:: Stanford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Rogers KB. 2018.. Do you see what I see? Testing for individual differences in impressions of events. . Soc. Psychol. Q. 81:(2):149–72
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  87. Rubin Z, Peplau A. 1973.. Belief in a just world and reactions to another's lot: a study of participants in the national draft lottery. . J. Soc. Issues 29:(4):73–93
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  88. Schein C, Gray K. 2015.. The unifying moral dyad: liberals and conservatives share the same harm-based moral template. . Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 41:(8):1147–63
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  89. Schein C, Gray K. 2016.. Moralization and harmification: the dyadic loop explains how the innocuous becomes harmful and wrong. . An Int. J. Adv. Psychol. Theory 27::62–65
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Schein C, Gray K. 2018.. The theory of dyadic morality: reinventing moral judgment by redefining harm. . Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 22:(1):32–70
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  91. Schelling TC. 1968.. Game theory and the study of ethical systems. . J. Conflict Resol. 12:(1):34–44
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  92. Shnabel N, Nadler A. 2015.. The role of agency and morality in reconciliation processes: the perspective of the needs-based model. . Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 24:(6):477–83
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  93. Shnabel N, Nadler A, Canetti-Nisim D, Ullrich J. 2008.. The role of acceptance and empowerment in promoting reconciliation from the perspective of the needs-based model. . Soc. Issues Policy Rev. 2:(1):159–86
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  94. Shupe EI. 2020.. Beneath the surface of the sexual harassment label: a mixed methods study of young working women. . Sex Roles 83:(3):179–92
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  95. Skocpol T. 1995.. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA:: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Slovic P. 2007.. “If I look at the mass I will never act”: psychic numbing and genocide. . Judgm. Decis. Mak. 2::79–95
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  97. Slovic P, Västfjäll D, Erlandsson A, Gregory R. 2017.. Iconic photographs and the ebb and flow of empathic response to humanitarian disasters. . PNAS 114:(4):640–44
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  98. Small D. 2015.. On the psychology of the identifiable victim effect. . In Identified Versus Statistical Lives: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, ed. IG Cohen, N Daniels, N Eydal , pp. 12–23. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Smith-Lovin L. 1987.. Impressions from events. . J. Math. Soc. 13::35–70
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  100. Sweet P. 2021.. The Politics of Surviving: How Women Navigate Domestic Violence and its Aftermath. Berkeley:: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Tajfel H, Turner JC. 2004.. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. . In Key Readings in Political Psychology, ed. JT Jost, J Sidanius , pp. 276–93. London:: Psychology
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Tapia Navarro N. 2019.. The category of victim “from below”: The case of the movement of victims of state crimes (MOVICE) in Colombia. . Hum. Rights Rev. 20:(3):289–312
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  103. Tillery AB. 2019.. What kind of movement is Black Lives Matter? The view from Twitter. . J. Race Ethn. Politics 4:(2):297–323
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  104. Tomm BM, Slovic P, Zhao J. 2019.. The number of visible victims shapes visual attention and compassion. . J. Vision 19:(10):105c
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  105. Vidmar N. 2001.. Retribution and revenge. . In Handbook of Justice Research in Law, ed. J Sanders, VL Hamilton , pp. 31–63. Dordrecht, Neth:.: Kluwer Acad.
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Vidmar N, Miller DT. 1980.. Socialpsychological processes underlying attitudes toward legal punishment. . Law Soc. Rev. 14:(3):565–602
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  107. Wegner DM, Gray K. 2016.. The Mind Club: Who Thinks, What Feels, and Why It Matters. New York:: Penguin
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Weiner B. 1980.. A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: an analysis of judgments of help-giving. . J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 39::186–200
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  109. Wenzel M, Okimoto TG. 2010.. How acts of forgiveness restore a sense of justice: addressing status/power and value concerns raised by transgressions. . Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 40:(3):401–17
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  110. Wenzel M, Okimoto TG. 2016.. Retributive justice. . In Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research, ed. C Sabbagh, M Schmitt , pp. 237–56. New York:: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Wenzel M, Thielmann I. 2006.. Why we punish in the name of justice: just desert versus value restoration and the role of social identity. . Soc. Justice Res. 19:(4):450–70
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-030222-032739
Loading
Are Victims Virtuous or Vilified? The Stories We Tell Ourselves (and Each Other)
Annual Review of Sociology 50, 129 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-030222-032739
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-030222-032739
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-030222-032739
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error