Social Inequality in High Tech: How Gender, Race, and Ethnicity Structure the World's Most Powerful Industry

Literature Cited

1. Abad MV. 2022. Wisdom behind cultural capital: race, gender, and the corporate labor market Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Conference Los Angeles:
2. Alegria S. 2019. Escalator or step stool? Gendered labor and token processes in tech work. Gend. Soc. 33:5722–45
   [Google Scholar]
3. Alegria S. 2020. What do we mean by broadening participation? Race, inequality, and diversity in tech work. Sociol. Compass 14:6e12793
   [Google Scholar]
4. Alfrey L, Twine FW. 2017. Gender-fluid geek girls: negotiating inequality regimes in the tech industry. Gend. Soc. 31:128–50
   [Google Scholar]
5. Alimahomed-Wilson J, Reese E 2021. Surveilling Amazon's warehouse workers: racism, retaliation, and worker resistance amid the pandemic. Work Glob. Econ. 1:1/255–73
   [Google Scholar]
6. Banerjee P. 2006. Indian information technology workers in the United States: the H-1B visa, flexible production, and the racialization of labor. Crit. Sociol. 32:2/3425–45
   [Google Scholar]
7. Banerjee P. 2022. The Opportunity Trap: High-Skilled Workers, Indian Families, and the Failures of the Dependent Visa Program New York: NYU Press
8. Banerjee P, Rincón L. 2019. Trouble in tech paradise. Contexts 18:224–29
   [Google Scholar]
9. Barefoot K, Curtis D, Jolliff W, Nicholson JR, Omohundro R. 2018. Defining and measuring the digital economy Work. Pap. Bur. Econ. Anal., US Dep. Commer. Washington, DC:
10. Barley SR, Kunda G. 2006. Gurus, Hired Guns, and Warm Bodies: Itinerant Experts in a Knowledge Economy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
11. Baron JN, Hannan MT, Burton MD. 2001. Labor pains: change in organizational models and employee turnover in young, high-tech firms. Am. J. Sociol. 106:4960–1012
    [Google Scholar]
12. Benjamin R. 2019. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code Medford, MA: Polity
13. Benner K. 2017. A backlash builds against sexual harassment in Silicon Valley. New York Times July 3. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/03/technology/silicon-valley-sexual-harassment.html
    [Google Scholar]
14. Bernstein E, Bunch J, Canner N, Lee M. 2016. Beyond the holacracy hype. Harvard Business Review July/Aug. 38–49. https://hbr.org/2016/07/beyond-the-holacracy-hype
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bittner A, Lau B. 2021. Women-led startups received just 2.3% of VC funding in 2020. Harvard Business Review Febr. 25. https://hbr.org/2021/02/women-led-startups-received-just-2-3-of-vc-funding-in-2020
    [Google Scholar]
16. Booz M. 2018. These 3 industries have the highest talent turnover rates. LinkedIn Talent Blog March 20. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/3-industries-have-highest-talent-turnover-rates-michael-booz
    [Google Scholar]
17. Bosky A, Muller C, Williams CL. 2022. Precarious professionals: layoffs and gender inequality in the oil and gas industry. Soc. Forces 101:2774–802
    [Google Scholar]
18. Branch EH. 2016. Pathways, Potholes, and the Persistence of Women in Science: Reconsidering the Pipeline Lanham, MD: Lexington
19. Brown E. 2019. Former WeWork executives allege gender, age discrimination. Wall Street Journal June 21. https://www.wsj.com/articles/former-wework-executives-allege-gender-age-discrimination-11561082242
    [Google Scholar]
20. Browne S. 2015. Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
21. Calasanti T 2003. Theorizing age relations. The Need for Theory S Biggs, J Hendricks, A Lowenstein 199–218. New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
22. Carter P. 2009. Equity and empathy: toward racial and educational achievement in the Obama era. Harv. Educ. Rev. 79:2287–97
    [Google Scholar]
23. Cech E. 2015. Engineers and engineeresses? Self-conceptions and the development of gendered professional identities. Sociol. Perspect. 58:156–77
    [Google Scholar]
24. Cech E, Blair-Loy M. 2019. The changing career trajectories of new parents in STEM. PNAS 116:104182–87
    [Google Scholar]
25. Cech E, Rubineau B, Silbey S, Seron C. 2011. Professional role confidence and gendered persistence in engineering. Am. Sociol. Rev. 76:5641–66
    [Google Scholar]
26. Cech E, Waidzunas T. 2022. LGBTQ@NASA and beyond: work structure and workplace inequality among LGBTQ STEM professionals. Work Occup 49:2187–228
    [Google Scholar]
27. Chavez K. 2021. Penalized for personality: a case study of Asian-origin disadvantage at the point of hire. Sociol. Race Ethn. 7:2226–46
    [Google Scholar]
28. Chavez K, Weisshaar KR, Cabello-Hunt T. 2022. Hiring folks for diversity: commodification of gender and racial diversity in hiring by job level Paper presented at American Sociological Association Annual Conference Los Angeles:
29. Chen C. 2022. Work Pray Code: When Work Becomes Religion in Silicon Valley Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
30. Chin MM. 2020. Stuck: Why Asian Americans Don't Reach the Top of the Corporate Ladder New York: NYU Press
31. Chow TY. 2023. Privileged but not in power: how Asian American tech workers use racial strategies to deflect and confront race and racism. Qual. Sociol. 46:129–52
    [Google Scholar]
32. Cooper M. 2000. Being the “go-to guy”: fatherhood, masculinity, and the organization of work in Silicon Valley. Qual. Sociol. 23:4379–405
    [Google Scholar]
33. Cooper M. 2014. Cut Adrift: Families in Insecure Times Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
34. Correll S. 2017. Reducing gender biases in modern workplaces: a small wins approach to organizational change. Gend. Soc. 31:6725–50
    [Google Scholar]
35. Correll SJ, Weisshaar KR, Wynn AT, Wehner JD. 2020. Inside the black box of organizational life: the gendered language of performance assessment. Am. Sociol. Rev. 85:61022–50
    [Google Scholar]
36. Daniels J. 2009. Cyber Racism: White Supremacy Online and the New Attack on Civil Rights Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
37. Edwards E. 2021. Check your stats: The lack of diversity in venture capital is worse than it looks. Forbes Febr. 24. https://www.forbes.com/sites/elizabethedwards/2021/02/24/check-your-stats-the-lack-of-diversity-in-venture-capital-is-worse-than-it-looks
    [Google Scholar]
38. EEOC (US Equal Employ. Oppor. Comm.) 2016. Diversity in high tech Rep. US EEOC Washington, DC: https://www.eeoc.gov/special-report/diversity-high-tech
39. Ensmenger NL. 2012. The Computer Boys Take Over: Computers, Programmers, and the Politics of Technical Expertise Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
40. Eubanks V. 2018. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin's
41. Frick W. 2014. How old are Silicon Valley's top founders? Here's the data. Harvard Business Review April 3. https://hbr.org/2014/04/how-old-are-silicon-valleys-top-founders-heres-the-data
    [Google Scholar]
42. Gee B, Peck D. 2017. The illusion of Asian success: scant progress for minorities in cracking the glass ceiling from 2007–2015 Work. Pap. Ascend Pan-Asian Leaders, Ascend Found. New York:
43. Gershon I 2017. Down and Out in the New Economy: How People Find (or Don't Find) Work Today Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
44. Google 2022. Google diversity annual report 2022 Rep. Google Mountain View, CA:
45. Gosselin P, Tobin A. 2018. Cutting ‘old heads’ at IBM. ProPublica March 22. https://features.propublica.org/ibm/ibm-age-discrimination-american-workers
    [Google Scholar]
46. Govindarajan V, Srivastava A. 2019. No, WeWork isn't a tech company. Here's why that matters. Harvard Business Review Aug. 21. https://hbr.org/2019/08/no-wework-isnt-a-tech-company-heres-why-that-matters
    [Google Scholar]
47. Gray ML, Suri S. 2019. Ghost Work: How to Stop Silicon Valley from Building a New Global Underclass Boston: Harper Bus.
48. Han J, Tomaskovic-Devey D. 2022. Is tech sector diversity improving? Rep. Cent. Employ. Equity, Univ Mass. Amherst, MA: https://www.umass.edu/employmentequity/tech-sector-diversity-improving
49. Harnett S. 2020. Words matter: how tech media helped write gig companies into existence. Beyond the Algorithm: Qualitative Insights for Gig Work Regulation D Das Acevedo 169–88. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
50. Harris M. 2023. Palo Alto: A History of California, Capitalism, and the World New York: Little, Brown
51. Harrison S. 2019. Five years of tech diversity reports—and little progress. Wired Oct. 1. https://www.wired.com/story/five-years-tech-diversity-reports-little-progress
    [Google Scholar]
52. Hart CG. 2021. Trajectory guarding: managing unwanted, ambiguously sexual interactions at work. Am. Sociol. Rev. 86:2256–78
    [Google Scholar]
53. Hayes D. 1999. Behind the Silicon Curtain: The Seductions of Work in a Lonely Era Boston: South End
54. Hern A. 2019. Google pays $11m to jobseekers who alleged age discrimination. The Guardian July 22. http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/jul/22/google-pays-11m-to-jobseekers-who-alleged-age-discrimination
    [Google Scholar]
55. Hill C, Corbett C, St. Rose A. 2010. Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Rep. Am. Assoc. Univ. Women Washington, DC:
56. Hossfeld KJ. 1994. Hiring immigrant women: Silicon Valley's “simple formula. .” In Women of Color in U.S. Society MB Zinn, BT Dill 65–94. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
57. Hossfeld KJ. 1995. Why aren't high tech workers organized? Lessons in gender, race, and nationality from Silicon Valley. Working People of California D Conford 405–32. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
58. Hyman L. 2018. Temp: The Real Story of What Happened to Your Salary, Benefits, and Job Security London: Penguin
59. Irani L. 2015. Difference and dependence among digital workers: the case of Amazon Mechanical Turk. S. Atl. Q. 114:1225–34
    [Google Scholar]
60. Kalev A. 2014. How you downsize is who you downsize: biased formalization, accountability, and managerial diversity. Am. Sociol. Rev. 79:1109–35
    [Google Scholar]
61. Kelly EL, Moen P. 2020. Overload: How Good Jobs Went Bad and What We Can Do About It Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
62. Kelly EL, Moen P, Tranby E. 2011. Changing workplaces to reduce work-family conflict: schedule control in a white-collar organization. Am. Sociol. Rev. 76:2265–90
    [Google Scholar]
63. Kenney M 2000. Understanding Silicon Valley: The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
64. Krippner GR. 2005. The financialization of the American economy. Socio-Econ. Rev. 3:2173–208
    [Google Scholar]
65. Kunda G. 1992. Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press
66. Lécuyer C. 2005. Making Silicon Valley: Innovation and the Growth of High Tech, 1930–1970 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
67. Lee JC. 2013. Employment and earnings in high-tech ethnic niches. Soc. Forces 91:3747–84
    [Google Scholar]
68. Lin K-H, Neely MT. 2020. Divested: Inequality in the Age of Finance Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
69. Lin K-H, Tomaskovic-Devey D. 2013. Financialization and U.S. income inequality, 1970–2008. Am. J. Sociol. 118:51284–329
    [Google Scholar]
70. Luhr S. 2019. Glass walls: gender, role sorting, and unequal trajectories in the San Francisco Bay Area tech industry Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Conference New York:
71. Luhr S. 2020. Vanishing women: gender presentation and belonging Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Conference San Francisco:
72. Luhr S. 2023.. ‘ We're better than most’: diversity discourse in the San Francisco Bay Area tech industry. Soc. Problems In press
    [Google Scholar]
73. Mac R, Yaffe-Bellany D. 2022. Inside a corporate culture war stoked by a crypto C.E.O. New York Times June 15. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/15/technology/kraken-crypto-culture.html
    [Google Scholar]
74. Malone MS. 1985. The Big Score: The Billion Dollar Story of Silicon Valley Garden City, NY: Doubleday:
75. McGee EO, Bentley L. 2017. The troubled success of Black women in STEM. Cogn. Instr. 35:4265–89
    [Google Scholar]
76. Mickey E 2018. Networks of exclusion in a gendered organization in the high-tech industry PhD Diss. Northeastern Univ. Boston:
77. Mickey E 2019. When gendered logics collide: going public and restructuring in a high-tech organization. Gend. Soc. 33:4509–33
    [Google Scholar]
78. Mickey E 2022. The organization of networking and gender inequality in the new economy: evidence from the tech industry. Work Occup. 49:4383–420
    [Google Scholar]
79. Misa TJ 2010. Gender Codes: Why Women Are Leaving Computing Hoboken, NJ: Wiley/IEEE
80. Nakamura L. 2014. Indigenous circuits: Navajo women and the racialization of early electronic manufacture. Am. Q. 66:4919–41
    [Google Scholar]
81. Neely MT. 2018. Fit to be king: how patrimonialism on Wall Street leads to inequality. Socio-Econ. Rev. 16:2365–85
    [Google Scholar]
82. Neely MT. 2020. The portfolio ideal worker: insecurity and inequality in the new economy. Qual. Sociol. 43:2271–96
    [Google Scholar]
83. Neely MT. 2022. Hedged Out: Inequality and Insecurity on Wall Street Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press
84. Neff G. 2012. Venture Labor: Work and the Burden of Risk in Innovative Industries Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
85. Nelson LK, Zippel K. 2021. From theory to practice and back: how the concept of implicit bias was implemented in academe, and what this means for gender theories of organizational change. Gend. Soc. 35:3330–57
    [Google Scholar]
86. Nicholas T. 2019. VC: An American History Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
87. Noble SU. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism New York: NYU Press
88. Oldenziel R. 2004. Making Technology Masculine: Men, Women, and Modern Machines in America, 1870–1945 Amsterdam: Amsterdam Univ. Press
89. Ollilainen M, Calasanti T. 2007. Metaphors at work: maintaining the salience of gender in self-managing teams. Gend. Soc. 21:15–27
    [Google Scholar]
90. O'Mara M. 2019. The Code: Silicon Valley and the Remaking of America London: Penguin
91. Osnowitz D. 2010. Freelancing Expertise: Contract Professionals in the New Economy Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
92. Pelisson A, Hartmans A. 2017. The average age of employees at all the top tech companies, in one chart. Business Insider Sept. 11. https://www.businessinsider.com/median-tech-employee-age-chart-2017-8
    [Google Scholar]
93. Pellow D, Park LS-H. 2002. The Silicon Valley of Dreams: Environmental Injustice, Immigrant Workers, and the High-Tech Global Economy New York: NYU Press
94. Pisoni A. 2015. Here's why you should care about holacracy. Fast Company May 6. https://www.fastcompany.com/3045848/heres-why-you-should-care-about-holacracy
    [Google Scholar]
95. Prescod-Weinstein C. 2021. The Disordered Cosmos: A Journey into Dark Matter, Spacetime, and Dreams Deferred New York: Bold Type
96. Quinn BA. 2000. The paradox of complaining: law, humor, and harassment in the everyday work world. Law Soc. Inq. 25:41151–85
    [Google Scholar]
97. Rao AH. 2020. Crunch Time: How Married Couples Confront Unemployment Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press
98. Ravenelle AJ. 2019. Hustle and Gig: Struggling and Surviving in the Sharing Economy Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press
99. Rider CI, Sterling AD, Tan D 2016. Career mobility and racial diversity in law firms. Diversity in Practice S Headworth, RL Nelson, R Dinovitzer, DB Wilkins 357–82. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
100. Ridgeway CL. 2011. Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
101. Riegle-Crumb C, Humphries M. 2012. Exploring bias in math teachers’ perceptions of students’ ability by gender and race/ethnicity. Gend. Soc. 26:2290–322
     [Google Scholar]
102. Riegle-Crumb C, Moore C 2014. The gender gap in high school physics: considering the context of local communities. Soc. Sci. Q. 95:1253–68
     [Google Scholar]
103. Roscigno VJ, Mong S, Byron R, Tester G 2007. Age discrimination, social closure and employment. Soc. Forces 86:1313–34
     [Google Scholar]
104. Rudrappa S. 2010. Cyber-coolies and techno-braceros: race and commodification of Indian information technology guest workers in the United States. Univ. San Franc. Law Rev. 44:2353–72
     [Google Scholar]
105. Ruiz NG. 2017. Key facts about the U.S. H-1B visa program. Pew Research Center Blog April 27. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/27/key-facts-about-the-u-s-h-1b-visa-program
     [Google Scholar]
106. Schor JB. 2020. After the Gig: How the Sharing Economy Got Hijacked and How to Win It Back Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press
107. Sheehan P. 2021. Unemployment experts: governing the job search in the new economy. Work Occup 48:4470–97
     [Google Scholar]
108. Sheehan P. 2022. The paradox of self-help expertise: how unemployed workers become professional career coaches. Am. J. Sociol. 127:41151–82
     [Google Scholar]
109. Shestakofsky B. 2017. Working algorithms: software automation and the future of work. Work Occup. 44:4376–423
     [Google Scholar]
110. Shestakofsky B. 2020. Stepping back to move forward: centering capital in discussions of technology and the future of work. Commun. Public 5:3/4129–33
     [Google Scholar]
111. Shestakofsky B, Kelkar S. 2020. Making platforms work: relationship labor and the management of publics. Theory Soc. 49:5/6863–96
     [Google Scholar]
112. Shih J. 2006. Circumventing discrimination gender and ethnic strategies in Silicon Valley. Gend. Soc. 20:2177–206
     [Google Scholar]
113. Simard C, Davies Henderson A, Gilmartin SK, Schiebinger L, Whitney T 2007. Climbing the technical ladder: obstacles and solutions for mid-level women in technology Rep. Clayman Inst. Gend. Res., Stanford Univ. Stanford, CA: https://gender.stanford.edu/sites/gender/files/climbing_the_technical_ladder.pdf
114. Smith-Doerr L. 2004. Women's Work: Gender Equality Versus Hierarchy in the Life Sciences Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner
115. Smith-Doerr L, Croissant J. 2011. A feminist approach to university-industry relations: integrating theories of gender, knowledge, and capital. J. Women Minor. Sci. Eng. 17:3251–69
     [Google Scholar]
116. Sobering K. 2019. The relational production of workplace equality: the case of worker-recuperated businesses in Argentina. Qual. Sociol. 42:543–65
     [Google Scholar]
117. Teitelbaum MS. 2014. Falling Behind? Boom, Bust, and the Global Race for Scientific Talent Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
118. Turco C. 2016. The Conversational Firm: Rethinking Bureaucracy in the Age of Social Media New York: Columbia Univ. Press
119. Twine FW. 2018. Technology's invisible women: Black geek girls in Silicon Valley and the failure of diversity initiatives. Int. J. Crit. Divers. Stud. 1:158–79
     [Google Scholar]
120. Twine FW. 2022. Geek Girls: Inequality and Opportunity in Silicon Valley New York: NYU Press
121. Vallas S, Schor JB. 2020. What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 46:273–94
     [Google Scholar]
122. van der Zwan N. 2014. Making sense of financialization. Socio-Econ. Rev. 12:199–129
     [Google Scholar]
123. van Romburgh M. 2021. Funding to Black startup founders quadrupled in past year, but remains elusive. Crunchbase News July 13. https://news.crunchbase.com/venture/something-ventured-funding-to-black-startup-founders-quadrupled-in-past-year-but-remains-elusive
     [Google Scholar]
124. Vassallo T, Levy E, Madansky M, Mickell H, Porter B et al. 2015. The elephant in the valley Surv., Elephant in the Valley Stanford, CA: https://www.elephantinthevalley.com
125. Wajcman J. 1991. Feminism Confronts Technology University Park: Pa. State Univ. Press
126. Wajcman J. 2009. Feminist theories of technology. Camb. J. Econ. 34:1143–52
     [Google Scholar]
127. Wakabayashi D. 2019. Google's shadow work force: temps who outnumber full-time employees. New York Times May 28. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/28/technology/google-temp-workers.html
     [Google Scholar]
128. Wiener A. 2020. Uncanny Valley: A Memoir New York: MCD
129. Williams CL 2017. The gender of layoffs in the oil and gas industry. Precarious Work AL Kalleberg, SP Vallas 215–41. Bingley, UK: Emerald. Res. Sociol Work Vol. 31
     [Google Scholar]
130. Williams CL. 2021. Gaslighted: How the Oil and Gas Industry Shortchanges Women Scientists Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press
131. Williams CL, Muller C, Kilanski K. 2012. Gendered organizations in the new economy. Gend. Soc. 26:4549–73
     [Google Scholar]
132. Williams JC. 2001. Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do About It Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
133. Wingfield AH, Alston RS. 2012. The understudied case of Black professional men: advocating an intersectional approach. Sociol. Compass 6:9728–39
     [Google Scholar]
134. Wolfe T. 1983. The tinkerings of Robert Noyce: how the sun rose on the Silicon Valley. Esquire Magazine Dec. 1 346–74
     [Google Scholar]
135. Women Who Tech 2020. The state of women in tech and startups Rep. Women Who Tech https://womenwhotech.org/data-and-resources/state-women-tech-and-startups
136. Wynn AT, Correll SJ. 2018. Puncturing the pipeline: Do technology companies alienate women in recruiting sessions?. Soc. Stud. Sci. 48:1149–64
     [Google Scholar]