1932

Abstract

Information policing seems to be pervading public security police all around the world. This review asks whether this appellation describes a homogeneous set of phenomena. Compstat was the first program to massively computerize policing. The literature reviewed here follows its fate in the United States and, on a global scale, in France, where the program was imported. The review successively discusses the perspective of managers who were favorable to the program and that of “statactivists,” activists who use statistics, who were opposed to it. Despite the many differences intervened during the importation process, especially in the balance of expertise and publicity, some points seem to be common to both contexts, such as the building of a computer infrastructure, a specific use of the data, and the constructive tensions between the police institution and its critics.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053308
2018-07-30
2024-06-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/44/1/annurev-soc-060116-053308.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053308&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Belorgey N 2010. L'hôpital sous pression: Enquête sur le nouveau management public Paris: Découverte
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ben Achour S 2017. La bataille contre les contrôles au faciès (saison 1). Délibérée 1:186–90
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berns T 2009. Gouverner sans gouverner: Une archéologie politique de la statistique Paris: PUF
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Biderman AD 1972. An Inventory of Surveys of the Public on Crime, Justice and Related Topics Washington, DC: Natl. Inst. Law Enforc. Crim. Justice
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Biderman AD, Reiss AJ 1967. On exploring the “dark figure” of crime. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 374:1–15
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bloomberg ML, Goldsmith S, Weinstein E 2010. Mayor's management report Rep., New York City. http://www.nyc.gov/html/ops/downloads/pdf/mmr/0910_mmr.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Boltanski L 2014. Quelle statistique pour quelle critique. Statactivisme: Comment lutter avec des nombres I Bruno, E Didier, J Prévieux 33–50 Paris: Zones
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bratton W 1996. Cutting Crime and Restoring Order: What America Can Learn from New York's Finest Washington, DC: Heritage Found. http://s3.amazonaws.com/thf_media/1996/pdf/hl573.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bratton W 1998. Turnaround: How America's Top Cop Reversed the Crime Epidemic New York: Random House, 1st ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bratton W 2014. Bill Bratton: You can't police without stop-and-frisk. Here and Now Feb. 25. http://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2014/02/25/bill-bratton-nypd
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bruno I, Didier E 2013. Benchmarking: L'état sous pression statistique Paris: Découverte
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bruno I, Didier E, Prévieux J 2014.a Statactivisme: Comment lutter avec des nombres Paris: Zones
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bruno I, Didier E, Vitale T 2014.b Statactivism: forms of action between disclosure and affirmation. Partecip. Confl. 7:2198–220
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bruno I, Jany-Catrice F, Touchelay B 2016. The Social Sciences of Quantification 13 Cham, Switz.: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Camp RC 1989. Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices That Lead to Superior Performance Milwaukee, WI: Qual. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Cent. Const. Rights. 2012. Stop and Frisk: The Human Impact New York: Cent. Const. Rights https://ccrjustice.org/sites/default/files/attach/2015/08/the-human-impact-report.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Chilvers M, Weatherburn D 2004. The New South Wales “Compstat” process: its impact on crime. Aust. N. Z. J. Criminol. 37:122–48
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Crahan ME, Vourvoulias-Bush A 1997. The City and the World: New York's Global Future New York: Counc. Foreign Relat.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Criminol. Public Policy. 2003. Editorial introduction: Compstat. Criminol. Public Policy 2:3419–20
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Dardot P, Laval C 2009. La nouvelle raison du monde: Essai sur la société néolibérale Paris: Découverte
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Daston L 1988. Classical Probability in the Enlightenment Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Data L 2009. Le grand truquage: Comment le gouvernement manipule les statistiques Paris: Découverte
    [Google Scholar]
  23. de Castelbajac M 2014. Enquête sur des enquêtes: Les enquêtes de victimation et la connaissance du crime PhD Thesis, Univ. Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, Fr.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. de Maillard J 2010. Les politiques de sécurité. Politiques publiques, Vol. 2: Changer la société O Borraz, V Guiraudon 57–77 Paris: SciencesPo
    [Google Scholar]
  25. de Maillard J, Goff TL 2009. La tolérance zéro en France. Rev. Fr. Sci. Politique 59:4655–79
    [Google Scholar]
  26. de Maillard J, Mouhanna C 2016. Governing the police by numbers: the French experience. Comparing the Democratic Governance of Police Intelligence: New Models of Participation and Expertise in the United States and Europe JE Ross, T Delpeuch 273–98 Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. de Maillard J, Savage SP 2017. Policing as a performing art? The contradictory nature of contemporary police performance management. Criminol. Crim. Justice. In press. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895817718589
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  28. Dejours C 1998. Souffrance en France: La banalisation de l'injustice sociale Paris: Seuil
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Desrosières A 1998. The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Desrosières A 2014. Prouver et gouverner: Une analyse politique des statistiques publiques Paris: Découverte
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Diaz-Bone R, Didier E 2016. Introduction: the sociology of quantification. Perspectives on an emerging field in the social sciences. Hist. Soc. Res./Hist. Sozialforschung 41:27–26
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Didier E 2005. Relasing market statistics. Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy B Latour, P Weibel 638–42 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Didier E 2009. En quoi consiste l'Amérique? Les statistiques, le New Deal et la démocratie Paris: Découverte
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Didier E 2011.a L'État néolibéral ment-il. Terrain Anthropol. Sci. Hum.5766–81
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Didier E 2011.b “Compstat” in Paris: a device for prompting police initiatives and accountability. Champ Pénal/Penal Field VIII. http://journals.openedition.org/champpenal/9028
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Didier E 2015. Mesurer la délinquance en France depuis 1970: entre expertise et publicité. Ethnol. Fr. 45:1109–21
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Didier E 2016. Alain Desrosières and the Parisian flock: social studies of quantification in France since the 1970s. Hist. Soc. Res./Hist. Sozialforschung 41:227–47
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Didier E, Tasset C 2013. Pour un statactivisme: la quantification comme instrument d'ouverture du possible. Tracés 24:1123–40
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Dieu F 2003. La police et le “miracle new-yorkais”: éléments sur les réformes du NYPD (1993–2001). Community policing et zero tolerance à New York et Chicago: En finir avec les mythes F Ocqueteau 37–79 Paris: Doc. Fr.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Donzelot J 2003. Faire société: La politique de la ville aux États-Unis et en France Paris: Seuil
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Eck JE, Maguire ER 2006. Have changes in policing reduced violent crime? An assessment of evidence. The Crime Drop in America A Blumstein, J Wallman 207–65 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press. Rev. ed.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Espeland W, Sauder M 2016. Engines of Anxiety: Academic Rankings, Reputation, and Accountability New York: Russell Sage Found.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Espeland WN, Stevens ML 1998. Commensuration as a social process. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 24:313–43
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Eterno J, Silverman EB 2010. The NYPD's Compstat: compare statistics or compose statistics. Int. J. Police Sci. Manag. 12:3426–49
    [Google Scholar]
  45. [Google Scholar]
  46. Eterno J, Silverman EB 2012. The Crime Numbers Game: Management by Manipulation Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Fassin D 2013. Enforcing Order: An Ethnography of Urban Policing Cambridge, UK: Polity Press
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Fienberg SE, Reiss AJSoc. Sci. Res. Counc., Workshop Crim. Justice Stat. 1980. Indicators of Crime and Criminal Justice: Quantitative Studies Washington, DC: US Dep. Justice, Bur. Justice Stat.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Fitch R 2014. Assassination of New York New York: Verso
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Floyd v. City of New York, 959 F.Supp.2d 540 2013.
  51. Gagneron W, Le Dorh M, Jobic Y, Proix E 2014. Enregistrement des plaintes par les forces de sécurité intérieure sur le ressort de la préfecture de police Rep. 14-011/13-093/01 Insp. Gen. Adm., Minist. Inter. Paris: http://www.interieur.gouv.fr/Publications/Rapports-de-l-IGA/Rapports-recents-classes-par-date-de-mise-en-ligne/Enregistrement-des-plaintes-par-les-forces-de-securite-interieure-sur-le-ressort-de-la-prefecture-de-police
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Gelman A, Fagan J, Kiss A 2007. An analysis of the New York City Police Department's “stop-and-frisk” policy in the context of claims of racial bias. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 102:479813–23
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Glass I 2010. Is that a tape recorder in your pocket, or are you just unhappy to see me. This American Life Sept. 10. http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/414/right-to-remain-silent?act=2
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Goodhart C 1981. Problems of monetary management: the U.K. experience. Inflation, Depression, and Economic Policy in the West AS Courakis 111–46 London: Mansell
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Hacking I 1984. The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas About Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Hammer M, Champy J 1993. Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution New York: HarperBusiness
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Harcourt BE, Ludwig J 2006. Broken windows: new evidence from New York City and a five-city social experiment. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 73:1271–320
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Harcourt BE, Ludwig J 2007. Reefer madness: broken windows policing and misdemeanor marijuana arrests in New York City, 1989–2000. Criminol. Public Policy 6:1165–81
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Henry VE 2002. The COMPSTAT Paradigm: Management Accountability in Policing, Business and the Public Sector Flushing, NY: Looseleaf Law Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Hirschfield A, Bowers K, Bowers K 2001. Mapping and Analysing Crime Data: Lessons from Research and Practice London: Taylor & Francis
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Impini J-F 2013. Un mensonge d'état? L'imposture sécuritaire Paris: Éd. Michalon
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Jang H, Hoover LT, Joo H-J 2010. An evaluation of Compstat's effect on crime: the Fort Worth experience. Police Q. 13:4387–412
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Jasanoff S 1995. Science at the Bar: Law, Science, and Technology in America Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Jobard F, Lévy R 2011. Racial profiling: the Parisian police experience. Can. J. Criminol. Crim. Justice/Revue Can. Criminol. Justice Pénale 53:187–94
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Jobard F, Lévy R, Lamberth J, Névanen S 2012. Measuring appearance-based discrimination: an analysis of identity checks in Paris. Population 67:3349–76
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Jobard F, Maillard J de 2015. Sociologie de la police: Politiques, organisations, réformes Paris: Armand Colin
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Jones T 2007. Policy Transfer and Criminal Justice: Exploring US Influence over British Crime Control Policy Maidenhead, UK: Open Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Kelling GL 1996. Fixing Broken Windows: Restoring Order and Reducing Crime in Our Communities New York: Martin Kessler Books
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Kelling GL, Bratton WJ 1998. Declining crime rates: insiders’ views of the New York City story. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 88:41217–32
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Kelling GL, Wilson JQ 1982. Broken windows. The Atlantic Monthly Mar. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1982/03/broken-windows/304465/
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Latour B 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Levitt L 2009. NYPD Confidential: Power and Corruption in the Country's Greatest Police Force New York: Thomas Dunne Books, 1st ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Lipsky M 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services New York: Russell Sage Found.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Louis Harris and Associates. 1992. Why People Move to and Away from New York City New York: Manhattan Institute
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Lynch JP, Addington LA 2007. Understanding Crime Statistics: Revisiting the Divergence of the NCVS and UCR New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Mac Donald H 2016. The War on Cops: How the New Attack on Law and Order Makes Everyone Less Safe New York: Encounter Books
    [Google Scholar]
  77. MacKenzie DA, Muniesa F, Siu L 2007. Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Mann M 1997. Has globalization ended the rise and rise of the nation-state. Rev. Int. Political Econ. 4:3472–96
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Manning P 2001. Theorizing policing: the drama and myth of crime control in the NYPD. Theor. Criminol. 5:3315–44
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Matelly J-H, Mouhanna C 2007. Police, des chiffres et des doutes Paris: Éd. Michalon
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Mazerolle L, Rombouts S, McBroom J 2007. The impact of COMPSTAT on reported crime in Queensland. Polic. Int. J. 30:2237–56
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Meares TL 2015. Programming errors: understanding the constitutionality of stop-and-frisk as a program, not an incident. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 82:1159–79
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Mitchell K, Beckett K 2008. Securing the global city: crime, consulting, risk, and ratings in the production of urban space. Indiana J. Glob. Legal Stud. 15:175–99
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Mollenkopf JH, Castells M 1991. Dual City: Restructuring New York New York: Russell Sage Found.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Monjardet D 1996. Ce que fait la police: Sociologie de la force publique Paris: Découverte
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Monjardet D 2008. Notes inédites sur les choses policières, 1999–2006 Paris: Découverte
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Moore MH 2003. Sizing up Compstat: an important administrative innovation in policing. Criminol. Public Policy 2:3469–94
    [Google Scholar]
  88. New York City Police Dep. 2011. Murder New York City 2011 Rep New York City Police Dep. New York: http://www.nyc.gov/html/nypd/downloads/pdf/analysis_and_planning/2011_murder_in_nyc.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Obs. Nat. Délinq. Réponses Pénales. 2011. Géographie départemental des crimes et délits enregistrés en 2011 dans les départements métropolitains et d'outre-mer Bull., Obs. Nat. Délinq. Réponses Pénales Paris: https://www.inhesj.fr/sites/default/files/fichiers_site/ondrp/bulletins_annuels/ba_2011_carto_.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  90. O'Connell P 2002. An intellectual history of the Compstat model of police management PhD Thesis, John Jay College CUNY:
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Ocqueteau F 2003. Community policing et zero tolerance à New York et Chicago: En finir avec les mythes Paris: Doc. Fr.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Ocqueteau F 2006. Mais qui donc dirige la police? Sociologie des commissaires Paris: Armand Colin
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Ocqueteau F, Frenais J, Varly P 2002. Ordonner le désordre: Une contribution au débat sur les indicateurs du crime Paris: Doc. Fr.
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Osborne D, Gaebler T 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Packer HL 1966. The courts, the police, and the rest of us. J. Crim. Law Criminol. Police Sci. 57:3238–43
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Pichon P 2007. Journal d'un flic Paris: Flammarion
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Pooley E 1996. One good apple. Time Jan. 15 55–56
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Porter TM 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Préfecture de police de Paris. 2001. Rapport de la mission d'étude du système de saisie et de traitement des statistiques de la délinquance à New-York. Direction de la police urbaine de proximité, Direction de la police judiciaire, Direction de la logistique, juillet
  100. Pruvost G 2007. Profession, policier: Sexe, féminin Paris: Éd. Maison Sci. Homme
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Pruvost G 2008. De la “sergote” à la femme flic: Une autre histoire de l'institution policière, 1935–2005 Paris: Découverte
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Quéant A 1998. Le commissaire de police dans la société française Paris: Economica
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Rayman G 2010.a NYPD Tapes 3: a detective comes forward about downgraded sexual assaults. Village Voice June 8. http://www.villagevoice.com/news/nypd-tapes-3-a-detective-comes-forward-about-downgraded-sexual-assaults-6429667
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Rayman G 2010.b NYPD Tapes 4: the whistleblower, Adrian Schoolcraft. Village Voice June 15. http://www.villagevoice.com/news/nypd-tapes-4-the-whistleblower-adrian-schoolcraft-6429143
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Rayman G 2010.c NYPD Tapes 5: the corroboration. Village Voice Aug. 25. http://www.villagevoice.com/news/nypd-tapes-5-the-corroboration-6394666
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Rayman G 2010.d The NYPD Tapes: inside Bed-Stuy's 81st precinct. Village Voice May 4. http://www.villagevoice.com/news/the-nypd-tapes-inside-bed-stuys-81st-precinct-6429434
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Rayman G 2010.e The NYPD Tapes, part 2. Village Voice May 11. http://www.villagevoice.com/news/the-nypd-tapes-part-2-6428840
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Ridgeway G 2007. Analysis of Racial Disparities in the New York Police Department's Stop, Question, and Frisk Practices Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp.
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Robert P 1999. Le citoyen, le crime et l'état Geneva: Droz
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Robert P, Aubusson de Cavarlay B, Pottier M-L, Tournier P 1994. Les comptes du crime: Les délinquances en France et leurs mesures Paris: Éd. L'Harmattan, 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Robert P, Zauberman R 2011. Mesurer la délinquance Paris: SciencesPo
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Rottenburg R 2015. The World of Indicators: The Making of Governmental Knowledge Through Quantification New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Rouban L 2010. L'inspection générale des Finances, 1958–2008: pantouflage et renouveau des stratégies élitaires. Sociol. Prat.2119–34
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Rouban L 2012. L'État à l'épreuve du libéralisme: les entourages du pouvoir exécutif de 1974 à 2012. Rev. Fr. Adm. Publique142467–90
    [Google Scholar]
  115. Rouzeau M, Sintive J-C, Loiseau C, Savin A, Loron C, Kabla-Langlois I 2013. Rapport sur l'enregistrement des plaintes par les forces de sécurité intérieure Rep. 13-051/13-027/01 Insp. Gen. Adm., Minist. Inter Paris: http://www.interieur.gouv.fr/Publications/Rapports-de-l-IGA/Securite/Rapport-sur-l-enregistrement-des-plaintes-par-les-forces-de-securite-interieure
    [Google Scholar]
  116. Sampson RJ, Winter AS 2016. The racial ecology of lead poisoning: toxic inequality in Chicago neighborhoods, 1995–2013. Du Bois Rev. Soc. Sci. Res. Race 13:2261–83
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Sassen S 2007. Sociology of Globalization New York: W.W. Norton, 1st ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Scheindlin S 2013. Floyd v. City of New York. http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/cases/show.php?db=special&id=317
  119. Shearing CD, Stenning PC 1981. Modern private security: its growth and implications. Crime Justice 3:193–245
    [Google Scholar]
  120. Silverman EB 1999. NYPD Battles Crime: Innovative Strategies in Policing Boston: Northeastern Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Sparrow MK 2015. Measuring Performance in a Modern Police Organization Washington, DC: US Dep. Justice, Natl. Inst. Justice
    [Google Scholar]
  122. Stigler SM 1986. The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty Before 1900 Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Stoudt BG, Fine M, Fox M 2012. Growing up policed in the age of aggressive policing policies. New York Law School Law Rev. 56:41331–70
    [Google Scholar]
  124. Sweeten G 2016. What works, what doesn't, what's constitutional. Criminol. Public Policy 15:167–73
    [Google Scholar]
  125. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 1968.
  126. Timoney JF 2010. Beat Cop to Top Cop: A Tale of Three Cities Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Vitale AS 2008. City of Disorder: How the Quality of Life Campaign Transformed New York Politics New York: New York Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Weisburd D, Mastrofski SD, Greenspan R, Willis JJ 2004. The growth of Compstat in American policing Police Found. Rep., Apr. http://assets.lapdonline.org/assets/pdf/growthofcompstat.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  129. Weisburd D, Wooditch A, Weisburd S, Yang S-M 2016. Do stop, question, and frisk practices deter crime. Criminol. Public Policy 15:131–56
    [Google Scholar]
  130. Willis JJ 2004. Compstat and Organizational Change in the Lowell Police Department: Challenges and Opportunities Washington, DC: Police Found.
    [Google Scholar]
  131. Willis JJ, Mastrofski SD, Weisburd D 2007. Making sense of COMPSTAT: a theory-based analysis of organizational change in three police departments. Law Soc. Rev. 41:1147–88
    [Google Scholar]
  132. Zauberman R, Robert P 1996. Du côté des victimes: Un autre regard sur la délinquance Paris: Éd. L'Harmattan
    [Google Scholar]
  133. Zimring FE 2012. The City That Became Safe: New York's Lessons for Urban Crime and Its Control New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053308
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error