Over the past half century, scholars in the interdisciplinary field of judgment and decision making have amassed a trove of findings, theories, and prescriptions regarding the processes ordinary people enact when making choices. This body of knowledge, however, has had little influence on sociology. Sociological research on choice emphasizes how features of the social environment shape individual outcomes, not people's underlying decision processes. Our aim in this article is to provide an overview of selected ideas, models, and data sources from decision research that can fuel new lines of inquiry into how socially situated actors navigate both everyday and major life choices. We also highlight opportunities and challenges for cross-fertilization between sociology and decision research that can allow each field to expand its range of inquiry.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Literature Cited

  1. Alba J, Marmorstein H. 1987. The effects of frequency knowledge on consumer decision making. J. Consum. Res. 14:14–25 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alhakami A, Slovic P. 1994. A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Risk Anal 14:1085–96 [Google Scholar]
  3. Astone N, McLanahan S. 1991. Family structure, parental practices and high school completion. Am. Sociol. Rev. 56:309–20 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker W. 1984. The social structure of a national securities market. Am. J. Sociol. 89:775–811 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bapna R, Ramaprasad J, Shmueli G, Umyarov A. 2016. One-way mirrors in online dating: a randomized field experiment. Manag. Sci. 62:3100–22 [Google Scholar]
  6. Barberis N. 2013. Thirty years of prospect theory in economics: a review and assessment. J. Econ. Perspect. 27:173–95 [Google Scholar]
  7. Baron J. 1986. Tradeoffs among reasons for action. J. Theory Soc. Behav. 16:173–95 [Google Scholar]
  8. Baron J, Spranca M. 1997. Protected values. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 70:1–16 [Google Scholar]
  9. Becker G. 1993. Nobel lecture: the economic way of looking at behavior. J. Political Econ. 101:385–409 [Google Scholar]
  10. Beckert J. 1996. What is sociological about economic sociology? Uncertainty and the embeddedness of economic action. Theory Soc 25:803–40 [Google Scholar]
  11. Ben-Akiva M, Lerman S. 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  12. Bertrand M, Mullainathan S, Shafir E. 2004. A behavioral-economics view of poverty. Am. Econ. Rev. 94:419–23 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bettman J, Luce M, Payne J. 1998. Constructive consumer choice processes. J. Consum. Res. 25:187–217 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bettman J, Park C. 1980. Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: a protocol analysis. J. Consum. Res. 7:234–48 [Google Scholar]
  15. Blalock H. 1984. Contextual-effects models: theoretical and methodological issues. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 10:353–72 [Google Scholar]
  16. Braunstein M. 1972. Perception of rotation in depth: a process model. Psychol. Rev. 79:510–24 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bruch E, Feinberg F, Lee K. 2016. Extracting multistage screening rules from online dating activity data. PNAS 113:10530–35 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bruch E, Mare R. 2012. Methodological issues in the analysis of residential preferences, residential mobility, and neighborhood change. Sociol. Methodol. 42:103–54 [Google Scholar]
  19. Camerer C. 2004. Prospect theory in the wild: evidence from the field. Advances in Behavioral Economics C Camerer, G Loewenstein, M Rabin 148–61 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  20. Camerer C, Loewenstein G. 2004. Behavioral economics: past, present, future. Advances in Behavioral Economics C Camerer, G Loewenstein, M Rabin 3–51 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  21. Camerer C, Thaler R. 1995. Anomalies: ultimatums, dictators and manners. J. Econ. Perspect. 9:209–19 [Google Scholar]
  22. Camerer C, Weber M. 1992. Recent developments in modeling preferences: uncertainty and ambiguity. J. Risk Uncertain. 5:325–70 [Google Scholar]
  23. Carlsson F, Martinsson P. 2001. Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments? Application to the valuation of the environment. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 41:179–92 [Google Scholar]
  24. Carrillo L, Pattillo M, Hardy E, Acevedo-Garcia D. 2016. Housing decisions among low-income Hispanic households in Chicago. Cityscape 18:109–37 [Google Scholar]
  25. Chrzan K, Orme B. 2000. An overview and comparison of design strategies for choice-based conjoint analysis Res. Pap., Sawtooth Software, Inc. https://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/desgncbc.pdf [Google Scholar]
  26. Cialdini R. 2003. Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 12:105–9 [Google Scholar]
  27. Cialdini R, Goldstein N. 2004. Social influence: compliance and conformity. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55:591–621 [Google Scholar]
  28. Coleman J. 1986. Social theory, social research, and a theory of action. Am. J. Sociol. 91:1309–35 [Google Scholar]
  29. Coleman J. 1994. Foundations of Social Theory Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  30. Collier D. 2011. Understanding process tracing. Polit. Sci. Polit. 44:823–30 [Google Scholar]
  31. Cowan N. 2010. The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why?. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 19:51–57 [Google Scholar]
  32. Cox J, Grether D. 1996. The preference reversal phenomenon: response mode, markets and incentives. Econ. Theory 7:381–405 [Google Scholar]
  33. Dawes P, Brown J. 2002. Determinants of awareness, consideration, and choice set size in university choice. J. Mark. High. Educ. 12:49–75 [Google Scholar]
  34. Dawes P, Brown J. 2005. The composition of consideration and choice sets in undergraduate university choice: an exploratory study. J. Mark. High. Educ. 14:37–59 [Google Scholar]
  35. Denes-Raj V, Epstein S. 1994. Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: when people behave against their better judgment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 66:819–29 [Google Scholar]
  36. Dhar R, Nowlis S, Sherman S. 2000. Trying hard or hardly trying: an analysis of context effects in choice. J. Consum. Psychol. 9:189–200 [Google Scholar]
  37. Duchowski A. 2007. Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice London: Springer-Verlag [Google Scholar]
  38. Edland A. 1989. On cognitive processes under time stress: a selective review of the literature on time stress and related stress Rep., Dep. Psychol., Univ Stockholm, Sweden: [Google Scholar]
  39. Einhorn H. 1970. The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision-making. Psychol. Bull. 73:3221–30 [Google Scholar]
  40. Einhorn H, Hogarth R. 1988. Decision making under ambiguity: a note. Risk, Decision and Rationality B Munier 327–36 Dordrecht, Neth.: Reidel [Google Scholar]
  41. Ellsberg D. 1961. Risk ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Q. J. Econ. 75:643–69 [Google Scholar]
  42. Elrod T, Johnson R, White J. 2004. A new integrated model of noncompensatory and compensatory decision strategies. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 95:1–19 [Google Scholar]
  43. Emirbayer M. 1997. Manifesto for a relational sociology. Am. J. Sociol. 103:281–317 [Google Scholar]
  44. England P. 1989. A feminist critique of rational-choice theories: implications for sociology. Am. Sociol. 20:14–28 [Google Scholar]
  45. Epstein S. 1994. Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. Am. Psychol. 49:8709–24 [Google Scholar]
  46. Esser H. 1996. What is wrong with ‘variable sociology’?. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 12:159–66 [Google Scholar]
  47. Esser H, Kroneberg C. 2015. An integrative theory of action: the model of frame selection. Order at the Edge of Chaos: Social Psychology and the Problem of Social Order E Lawler, S Thye, J Yoon 63–85 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  48. Evans J. 2008. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59:255–78 [Google Scholar]
  49. Feinberg F, Huber J. 1996. A theory of cutoff formation under imperfect information. Manag. Sci. 42:65–84 [Google Scholar]
  50. Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, Read S, Combs B. 1978. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sci 9:127–52 [Google Scholar]
  51. Gely R, Spiller P. 1990. A rational choice theory of Supreme Court statutory decisions with applications to the State Farm and Grove City cases. J. Law Econ. Organ. 6:263–300 [Google Scholar]
  52. Gennetian L, Shafir E. 2015. The persistence of poverty in the context of financial instability: a behavioral perspective. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 34:904–36 [Google Scholar]
  53. Gigerenzer G. 2004. Fast and frugal heuristics: the tools of bounded rationality. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making DJ Koehler, N Harvey 62–88 Malden, MA: Blackwell Publ. [Google Scholar]
  54. Gigerenzer G. 2008. Why heuristics work. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 3:20–29 [Google Scholar]
  55. Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W. 2011. Heuristic decision making. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 62:451–82 [Google Scholar]
  56. Gigerenzer G, Goldstein D. 1999. Betting on one good reason: the take the best heuristic. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart G Gigerenzer, P Todd 75–95 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  57. Gilbride T, Allenby G. 2004. A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules. Mark. Sci. 23:391–406 [Google Scholar]
  58. Goffman E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  59. Goldstein D, Johnson E, Herrmann A, Heitmann M. 2008a. Nudge your customers towards better choices. Harvard Bus. Rev. 86:1299–105 [Google Scholar]
  60. Goldstein N, Cialdini R, Griskevicius V. 2008b. A room with a viewpoint: using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J. Consum. Res. 35:472–82 [Google Scholar]
  61. Goldthorpe J. 1996. The quantitative analysis of large-scale data-sets and rational action theory: for a sociological alliance. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 12:109–26 [Google Scholar]
  62. Granovetter M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 91:481–510 [Google Scholar]
  63. Green P, Krieger A, Wind Y. 2001. Thirty years of conjoint analysis: reflections and prospects. Interfaces 31:S56–73 [Google Scholar]
  64. Green P, Srinivasan V. 1978. Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook. J. Consum. Res. 5:103–23 [Google Scholar]
  65. Gross N. 2009. A pragmatist theory of social mechanisms. Am. Sociol. Rev. 74:358–79 [Google Scholar]
  66. Guadagni P, Little J. 1983. A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Mark. Sci. 2:203–38 [Google Scholar]
  67. Harding D. 2009. Violence, older peers, and the socialization of adolescent boys in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Am. Sociol. Rev. 74:445–64 [Google Scholar]
  68. Hauser J, Wernerfelt B. 1990. An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. J. Consum. Res. 16:393–408 [Google Scholar]
  69. Hechter M, Kanazawa S. 1997. Sociological rational choice theory. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 23:191–214 [Google Scholar]
  70. Hedström P, Bearman P. 2009. The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  71. Hedström P, Swedberg R. 1996. Rational choice, empirical research, and the sociological tradition. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 12:127–46 [Google Scholar]
  72. Hensher D, Rose J, Greene W. 2005. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  73. Higgins E. 1996. Knowledge activation: accessibility, applicability, and salience. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles E Higgins, A Kruglanski 133–68 New York: Guilford Press [Google Scholar]
  74. Hochschild A. 1989. The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home New York: Penguin Books [Google Scholar]
  75. Hogarth R. 1991. Judgment and Choice: The Psychology of Decision Chichester, UK: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  76. Horowitz J, Louviere J. 1995. What is the role of consideration sets in choice modeling. Int. J. Res. Mark. 12:39–54 [Google Scholar]
  77. Howard JA, Sheth JN. 1969. The Theory of Buyer Behavior New York: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  78. Huber J, Payne J, Puto C. 1982. Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. J. Consum. Res. 9:90–98 [Google Scholar]
  79. Johnson E, Goldstein D. 2013. Decisions by default. The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy E Shafir 417–27 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  80. Johnson E, Hershey J, Meszaros J, Kunreuther H. 1993. Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions. Making Decisions About Liability and Insurance CF Camerer, H Kunreuther 35–51 Dordrecht, Neth.: Springer [Google Scholar]
  81. Johnson E, Payne J. 1985. Effort and accuracy in choice. Manag. Sci. 31:4395–414 [Google Scholar]
  82. Kahneman D. 2003. Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 93:1449–75 [Google Scholar]
  83. Kahneman D. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux [Google Scholar]
  84. Kahneman D, Knetsch J, Thaler R. 1991. Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J. Econ. Perspect. 5:193–206 [Google Scholar]
  85. Kahneman D, Tversky A. 1979. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:2263–91 [Google Scholar]
  86. Kahneman D, Tversky A. 1982. Variants of uncertainty. Cognition 11:143–57 [Google Scholar]
  87. Kahneman D, Tversky A. 1984. Choices, values, and frames. Am. Psychol. 39:341–50 [Google Scholar]
  88. Kahneman D, Tversky A. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux [Google Scholar]
  89. Kirk D. 2009. A natural experiment on residential change and recidivism: lessons from Hurricane Katrina. Am. Sociol. Rev. 74:484–505 [Google Scholar]
  90. Kroneberg C. 2014. Frames, scripts, and variable rationality: an integrative theory of action. Analytical Sociology G Manzo 95–123 Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons [Google Scholar]
  91. Kroneberg C, Kalter F. 2012. Rational choice theory and empirical research: methodological and theoretical contributions in Europe. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 38:73–92 [Google Scholar]
  92. Krysan M, Bader M. 2009. Racial blind spots: black-white-Latino differences in community knowledge. Soc. Probl. 56:677–701 [Google Scholar]
  93. Lee V, Bryk A, Smith J. 1993. The organization of effective secondary schools. Rev. Res. Educ. 19:171–267 [Google Scholar]
  94. Lerner J, Li Y, Valdesolo P, Kassam K. 2015. Emotion and decision making. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 66:799–823 [Google Scholar]
  95. Leschziner V, Green A. 2013. Thinking about food and sex: deliberate cognition in the routine practices of a field. Sociol. Theory 31:116–44 [Google Scholar]
  96. Levy J. 1997. Prospect theory, rational choice, and international relations. Int. Stud. Q. 41:87–112 [Google Scholar]
  97. Liberman V, Samuels S, Ross L. 2004. The name of the game: predictive power of reputations versus situational labels in determining prisoner's dilemma game moves. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 30:1175–85 [Google Scholar]
  98. Lichtenstein S, Slovic P. 2006. The Construction of Preference Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  99. Lindenberg S, Frey B. 1993. Alternatives, frames, and relative prices: a broader view of rational choice theory. Acta Sociol 36:191–205 [Google Scholar]
  100. Liu L, Dukes A. 2013. Consideration set formation with multiproduct firms: the case of within-firm and across-firm evaluation costs. Manag. Sci. 59:1871–86 [Google Scholar]
  101. Loewenstein G. 2001. The creative destruction of decision research. J. Consum. Res. 28:499–505 [Google Scholar]
  102. Loewenstein G, Lerner J. 2003. The role of affect in decision making. Handbook of Affective Sciences RJ Davidson, KR Sherer, HH Goldsmith 619–42 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  103. Loewenstein G, Weber E, Hsee C, Welch N. 2001. Risk as feelings. Psychol. Bull. 127:2267–86 [Google Scholar]
  104. Lohse G, Johnson E. 1996. A comparison of two process tracing methods for choice tasks. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 68:128–43 [Google Scholar]
  105. Louviere J, Hensher D, Swait J. 2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  106. Louviere J, Meyer R, Bunch D, Carson R, Dellaert B. et al. 1999. Combining sources of preference data for modeling complex decision processes. Mark. Lett. 10:205–17 [Google Scholar]
  107. Luce M, Bettman J, Payne J. 2001. Emotional decisions: tradeoff difficulty and coping in consumer choice. Monogr. J. Consum. Res. 1:1–209 [Google Scholar]
  108. Luce M, Payne J, Bettman J. 1999. Emotional trade-off difficulty and choice. J. Mark. Res. 36:143–59 [Google Scholar]
  109. Luce M, Payne J, Bettman J. 2000. Coping with unfavorable attribute values in choice. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 81:274–99 [Google Scholar]
  110. Luce R. 1959. Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis New York: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  111. Mahoney J. 2012. The logic of process tracing tests in the social sciences. Sociol. Methods Res. 41:570–97 [Google Scholar]
  112. Malhotra N. 1982. Information load and consumer decision making. J. Consum. Res. 8:419–30 [Google Scholar]
  113. Mandel N, Johnson E. 2002. When web pages influence choice: effects of visual primes on experts and novices. J. Consum. Res. 29:235–45 [Google Scholar]
  114. Manski C. 2000. Economic analysis of social interactions. J. Econ. Perspect. 14:115–36 [Google Scholar]
  115. Manski C, McFadden D. 1981. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  116. Margolis H. 1982. Selfishness and Altruism Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  117. Matza D. 1967. Delinquency and Drift New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publ. [Google Scholar]
  118. McDaniels T, Axelrod L, Cavanagh N, Slovic P. 1997. Perception of ecological risk to water environments. Risk Anal 17:341–52 [Google Scholar]
  119. McFadden D. 1973. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics P Zarembka 105–42 New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
  120. McFadden D. 1999. Rationality for economists?. J. Risk Uncertain. 19:73–105 [Google Scholar]
  121. Miller G. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 63:81–97 [Google Scholar]
  122. Miller N. 1959. Liberalization of Basic SR Concepts: Extensions to Conflict Behavior, Motivation, and Social Learning New York: McGraw-Hill [Google Scholar]
  123. Mullainathan S, Shafir E. 2013. Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much New York: Times Books [Google Scholar]
  124. Munch R. 1992. Rational choice theory: a critical assessment of its explanatory power. Rational Choice Theory: Advocacy and Critique J Coleman, T Fararo 137–61 London: Sage [Google Scholar]
  125. Newell A, Simon H. 1972. Human Problem Solving Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall [Google Scholar]
  126. Nolan J, Schultz P, Cialdini R, Goldstein N, Griskevicius V. 2008. Normative social influence is underdetected. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34:913–23 [Google Scholar]
  127. Pachucki M, Jacques P, Christakis N. 2011. Social network concordance in food choice among spouses, friends, and siblings. Am. J. Public Health 101:2170–77 [Google Scholar]
  128. Payne J. 1976. Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: an information search and protocol analysis. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 16:366–87 [Google Scholar]
  129. Payne J, Bettman J. 2004. Walking with the scarecrow: the information-processing approach to decision research. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making DJ Koehler, N Harvey, 110–32 Malden, MA: Blackwell Publ. [Google Scholar]
  130. Payne J, Bettman J, Johnson E. 1993. The Adaptive Decision Maker Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  131. Perna L, Titus M. 2005. The relationship between parental involvement as social capital and college enrollment: an examination of racial/ethnic group differences. J. High. Educ. 76:485–518 [Google Scholar]
  132. Pescosolido B. 1992. Beyond rational choice: the social dynamics of how people seek help. Am. J. Sociol. 97:1096–138 [Google Scholar]
  133. Pocheptsova A, Amir O, Dhar R, Baumeister R. 2009. Deciding without resources: resource depletion and choice in context. J. Mark. Res. 46:344–55 [Google Scholar]
  134. Rieskamp J, Hoffrage U. 2008. Inferences under time pressure: how opportunity costs affect strategy selection. Acta Psychol 127:258–76 [Google Scholar]
  135. Roberts J, Lattin J. 1991. Development and testing of a model of consideration set composition. J. Mark. Res. 28:4429–40 [Google Scholar]
  136. Roberts J, Lattin J. 1997. Consideration: review of research and prospects for future insights. J. Mark. Res. 34:3406–10 [Google Scholar]
  137. Rosenquist N, Murabito J, Fowler J, Christakis N. 2010. The spread of alcohol consumption behavior in a large social network. Ann. Intern. Med. 152:426–33 [Google Scholar]
  138. Ross L, Nisbett R. 1991. The Person and the Situation New York: McGraw-Hill [Google Scholar]
  139. Salisbury L, Feinberg F. 2012. All things considered? The role of choice set formation in diversification. J. Mark. Res. 49:3320–35 [Google Scholar]
  140. Samuelson P. 1947. Some implications of linearity. Rev. Econ. Stud. 15:88–90 [Google Scholar]
  141. Samuelson P. 1948. Consumption theory in terms of revealed preference. Economica 15:243–53 [Google Scholar]
  142. Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R. 1988. Status quo bias in decision making. J. Risk Uncertain. 1:7–59 [Google Scholar]
  143. Satz D, Ferejohn J. 1994. Rational choice and social theory. J. Philos. 91:71–87 [Google Scholar]
  144. Scheff T. 1988. Shame and conformity: the deference-emotion system. Am. Sociol. Rev. 53:395–406 [Google Scholar]
  145. Schelling T. 1971. Dynamic models of segregation. J. Math. Sociol. 1:143–86 [Google Scholar]
  146. Schulte-Mecklenbeck M, Kuehberger A, Ranyard R. 2010. A Handbook of Process Tracing Methods for Decision Research: A Critical Review and User's Guide New York: Psychol. Press [Google Scholar]
  147. Schultz P, Wesley J, Nolan M, Cialdini R, Goldstein N, Griskevicius V. 2007. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol. Sci. 18:429–34 [Google Scholar]
  148. Schwarz N. 1999. Self-reports: how the questions shape the answers. Am. Psychol. 54:93–105 [Google Scholar]
  149. Schwarz N. 2007. Attitude construction: evaluation in context. Soc. Cogn. 25:638–56 [Google Scholar]
  150. Schwarz N, Strack F, Mai H. 1991. Assimilation and contrast effects in part-whole question sequences: a conversational logic analysis. Public Opin. Q. 55:3–23 [Google Scholar]
  151. Seidl C. 2002. Preference reversal. J. Econ. Surv. 16:621–55 [Google Scholar]
  152. Shafir E. 2013. The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  153. Shah A, Shafir E, Mullainathan S. 2015. Scarcity frames value. Psychol. Sci. 26:402–12 [Google Scholar]
  154. Shang J, Croson R. 2009. A field experiment in charitable contribution: the impact of social information on the voluntary provision of public goods. Econ. J. 119:1422–39 [Google Scholar]
  155. Sharkey P, Faber J. 2014. Where, when, why, and for whom do residential contexts matter? Moving away from the dichotomous understanding of neighborhood effects. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 40:559–79 [Google Scholar]
  156. Sharkey P, Tirado-Strayer N, Papachristos A, Raver C. 2012. The effect of local violence on children's attention and impulse control. Am. J. Public Health 102:2287–93 [Google Scholar]
  157. Shugan S. 1980. The cost of thinking. J. Consum. Res. 7:99–111 [Google Scholar]
  158. Simon H. 1991. Invariants of human behavior. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 41:1–20 [Google Scholar]
  159. Simon H. 1997. Models of Bounded Rationality: Empirically Grounded Economic Reason Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  160. Simonson I. 1989. Choice based on reasons: the case of attraction and compromise effects. J. Consum. Res. 16:158–74 [Google Scholar]
  161. Simonson I, Tversky A. 1992. Choice in context: tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. J. Mark. Res. 29:281–95 [Google Scholar]
  162. Slovic P. 1987. Perception of risk. Science 236:280–85 [Google Scholar]
  163. Slovic P, Finucane M, Peters E, MacGregor D. 2004. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal 24:311–22 [Google Scholar]
  164. Slovic P, Monahan J, MacGregor D. 2000. Violence risk assessment and risk communication: the effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats. Law Hum. Behav. 24:271–96 [Google Scholar]
  165. Slovic P, Peters E. 2006. Risk perception and affect. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 15:322–25 [Google Scholar]
  166. Small M. 2009. Unanticipated Gains: Origins of Network Inequality in Everyday Life Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  167. Small M, Sukhu C. 2016. Because they were there: access, deliberation, and the mobilization of networks for support. Soc. Netw. 47:73–84 [Google Scholar]
  168. Somers M. 1998. “We're no angels”: realism, rational choice, and relationality in social science. Am. J. Sociol. 104:722–84 [Google Scholar]
  169. Stets J, Turner J. 2014. Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions II New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  170. Svenson O. 1979. Process descriptions of decision making. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 23:186–112 [Google Scholar]
  171. Swait J. 1984. Probabilistic choice set generation in transportation demand models PhD Thesis, Mass. Inst. Technol. Cambridge, MA: [Google Scholar]
  172. Swait J. 2001. A non-compensatory choice model incorporating attribute cutoffs. Transp. Res. B Methodol. 35:10903–28 [Google Scholar]
  173. Thaler R, Sunstein C. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness New York: Penguin Books [Google Scholar]
  174. Thomas W, Znaniecki F. 1918. The Polish Peasant in Europe and America: Monograph of an Immigrant Group Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  175. Train K. 2009. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. , 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  176. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1973. Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cogn. Psychol. 5:207–32 [Google Scholar]
  177. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211:4481453–58 [Google Scholar]
  178. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1992. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertain. 5:297–323 [Google Scholar]
  179. Tversky A, Simonson I. 1993. Context-dependent preferences. Manag. Sci. 39:1179–89 [Google Scholar]
  180. Uzzi B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Adm. Sci. Q. 1:35–67 [Google Scholar]
  181. Vaisey S. 2009. Motivation and justification: a dual-process model of culture in action. Am. J. Sociol. 114:1675–715 [Google Scholar]
  182. Vaughan D. 1998. Rational choice, situated action, and the social control of organizations. Law Soc. Rev. 32:123–61 [Google Scholar]
  183. Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. 2007. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  184. Wedel M, Pieters R. 2008. A review of eye-tracking research in marketing. Rev. Mark. Res. 4:123–47 [Google Scholar]
  185. Windschitl P, Weber E. 1999. The interpretation of likely depends on the context, but 70% is 70%—right? The influence of associative processes on perceived certainty. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 25:1514–33 [Google Scholar]
  186. Wittink D, Cattin P. 1989. Commercial use of conjoint analysis: an update. J. Mark. 53:391–96 [Google Scholar]
  187. Wittink D, Vriens M, Burhenne W. 1994. Commercial use of conjoint analysis in Europe: results and critical reflections. Int. J. Res. Mark. 11:41–52 [Google Scholar]
  188. Wright P, Weitz B. 1977. Time horizon effects on product evaluation strategies. J. Mark. Res. 14:429–43 [Google Scholar]
  189. Yoon C, Gutchess A, Feinberg F, Polk T. 2006. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of neural dissociations between brand and person judgments. J. Consum. Res. 33:131–40 [Google Scholar]
  190. Zajonc R. 1980. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. Am. Psychol. 35:151–75 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error