1932

Abstract

Visualizing data is central to social scientific work. Despite a promising early beginning, sociology has lagged in the use of visual tools. We review the history and current state of visualization in sociology. Using examples throughout, we discuss recent developments in ways of seeing raw data and presenting the results of statistical modeling. We make a general distinction between those methods and tools designed to help explore data sets and those designed to help present results to others. We argue that recent advances should be seen as part of a broader shift toward easier sharing of code and data both between researchers and with wider publics, and we encourage practitioners and publishers to work toward a higher and more consistent standard for the graphical display of sociological insights.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145551
2014-07-30
2024-04-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/40/1/annurev-soc-071312-145551.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145551&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Alkema L, Raftery AE, Gerland P, Clark SJ, Pelletier F. et al. 2011. Probabilistic projections of the total fertility rate for all countries. Demography 48:815–39 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anscombe FJ. 1973. Graphs in statistical analysis. Am. Stat. 27:17–21 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bender-deMoll S, Morris M, Moody J. 2008. Prototype packages for managing and animating longitudinal network data: dynamicnetwork and rSoNIA. J. Stat. Softw. 24:7 http://www.jstatsoft.org/v24/i07 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bertin J. 1967 (2010). Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps Redlands, CA: ESRI Press
  5. Bloch M, Gebeloff R. 2009. Immigration explorer. New York Times, March 10. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/03/10/us/20090310-immigration-explorer.html.
  6. Bourdieu P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  7. Brandes U, Indlekofer N, Mader M. 2012. Visualization methods for longitudinal social networks and stochastic actor-oriented modeling. Soc. Netw. 43:291–308 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brandes U, Pich C. 2006. Eigensolver methods for progressive multidimensional scaling of large data. Int. Symp. Graph Drawing (GD), Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (LNCS) 4372:42–53 [Google Scholar]
  9. Breiger RL. 2000. A toolkit for practice theory. Poetics 27:91–115 [Google Scholar]
  10. Breiger RL, Melamed D. 2014. The duality of organizations and their attributes: turning regression modeling ‘inside out.’. Res. Sociol. Organ. 40:261–74 [Google Scholar]
  11. Buja A, Cook D, Hofmann H, Lawrence M, Lee EK. et al. 2009. Statistical inference for exploratory data analysis and model diagnostics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 367:4361–83 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chang W. 2013. The R Graphics Cookbook Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly
  13. Chapin FS. 1924. The statistical definition of a societal variable. Am. J. Sociol. 30:154–71 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chatterjee S, Firat A. 2007. Generating data with identical statistics but dissimilar graphics: a follow up to the Anscombe Dataset. Am. Stat. 61:248–54 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cleveland WS. 1993. Visualizing Data Summit, NJ: Hobart
  16. Cleveland WS. 1994. The Elements of Graphing Data Summit, NJ: Hobart
  17. Cook D, Swaine DF. 2007. Interactive and Dynamic Graphics for Data Analysis New York: Springer
  18. Crnovrsanin T, Muelder CW, Faris R, Felmlee D, Ma K-L. 2014. Visualization techniques for categorical analysis of social networks with multiple edge sets. Soc. Netw. 37:56–64 [Google Scholar]
  19. Du WEB Bois. 1898 (1967). The Philadelphia Negro New York: Shocken Books
  20. Emerson JW, Green W, Schloerke B, Crowley B, Cook D. et al. 2013. The generalized pairs plot. J. Comp. Graph. Stat. 22:79–91 [Google Scholar]
  21. Few S. 2009. Now You See It: Simple Visualization Techniques for Quantitative Analysis Oakland, CA: Analytics
  22. Few S. 2012. Show Me the Numbers: Designing Tables and Graphs to Enlighten Burlingame, CA: Analytics, 2nd ed..
  23. Fox J. 2003. Effect displays in R for generalised linear models. J. Stat. Softw. 8:15 http://www.jstatsoft.org/v08/i15/paper [Google Scholar]
  24. Fox J, Hong J. 2009. Effect displays in R for multinomial and proportional-odds logit models: extensions to the effects package. J. Stat. Softw. 32:1 http://www.jstatsoft.org/v32/i01/paper [Google Scholar]
  25. Frank KA, Yasumoto J. 1998. Linking action to social structure within a system: social capital within and between subgroups. Am. J. Sociol. 104:642–86 [Google Scholar]
  26. Freeman LC. 2004. The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science Vancouver, Can.: Empirical
  27. Freese J. 2007. Reproducibility standards in quantitative social science: why not sociology?. Soc. Methods Res. 36:153–72 [Google Scholar]
  28. Friendly M. 2000. Visualizing Categorical Data Cary, NC: SAS Inst.
  29. Gelman A. 2004. Exploratory data analysis for complex models. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 13:755–79 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gelman A, Unwin A. 2013. Infovis and statistical graphics: different goals, different looks. J. Comp. Graph. Stat. 22:2–28 [Google Scholar]
  31. Godfrey AJR. 2013. Statistical software from a blind person's perspective. R J. 5:73–79 [Google Scholar]
  32. Handcock MS, Morris M. 1999. Relative Distribution Methods in the Social Sciences New York: Springer-Verlag
  33. Harrell F. 2001. Regression Modeling Strategies New York: Springer
  34. Hart HH. 1896. Immigration and crime. Am. J. Sociol. 2:369–77 [Google Scholar]
  35. Healy K. 2012. America is a violent country. Kieran Healy Blog July 20. http://kieranhealy.org/blog/archives/2012/07/20/america-is-a-violent-country
  36. Hewitt C. 1977. The effect of political democracy and social democracy on equality in industrial societies: a cross-national comparison. Am. Sociol. Rev. 42:450–64 [Google Scholar]
  37. Inselberg A. 2009. Parallel Coordinates: Visual Multidimensional Geometry and its Applications New York: Springer
  38. Jackman RM. 1980. The impact of outliers on income inequality. Am. Sociol. Rev. 45:344–47 [Google Scholar]
  39. Katz J. 2013. Regional dialect variation in the continental US Work. Pap., Proj. Beyond “Soda, Pop, or Coke,” Dep. Stat., N.C. State Univ., Raleigh. http://www4.ncsu.edu/∼jakatz2/project-dialect.html
  40. Kenworthy L. 2014. Social Democratic America New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  41. Keynes JM. 1938. Review of HG Funkhouser, Historical Development of the Graphical Representation of Statistical Data. Econ. J. 48:281–82 [Google Scholar]
  42. Kleimean K, Horton NJ. 2013. SAS and R: Data Management, Statistical Analysis, and Graphics Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2nd ed..
  43. Kostelnick C. 2008. The visual rhetoric of data displays: the conundrum of clarity. IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun. 51:116–29 [Google Scholar]
  44. Lenski G. 1966. Power and Privilege New York: McGraw-Hill
  45. Lima M. 2011. Visual Complexity: Mapping Patterns of Information New York: Princeton Archit. Press
  46. Lundberg GA, Steele M. 1938. Social attraction-patterns in a village. Sociometry 1:375–419 [Google Scholar]
  47. Mann ME, Bradley RS, Hughes MK. 1999. Northern hemisphere temperatures during the past millennium: inferences, uncertainties, and limitations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 26:759–62 [Google Scholar]
  48. Marro A. 1899. Influence of the puberal development upon the moral character of children of both sexes. Am. J. Sociol. 5:193–219 [Google Scholar]
  49. Mirowsky J, Kim J. 2007. Graphing age trajectories: vector graphs, synthetic and virtual cohort projections, and virtual cohort projections, and cross-sectional profiles of depression. Sociol. Methods Res. 35:497–541 [Google Scholar]
  50. Mirowsky J, Ross C. 2007. Life course trajectories of perceived control and their relationship to education. Am. J. Sociol. 112:1339–82 [Google Scholar]
  51. Mitchell M. 2012. A Visual Guide to Stata Graphics College Station, TX: Stata, 3rd ed..
  52. Moody J. 2004. The structure of a social science collaboration network: disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999. Am. Sociol. Rev. 69:213–38 [Google Scholar]
  53. Moody J, Brynildsen WD, Osgood DW, Feinberg ME, Gest S. 2011. Popularity trajectories and substance use in early adolescence. Soc. Netw. 33:101–12 [Google Scholar]
  54. Moody J, Light R. 2006. A view from above: the evolving sociological landscape. Am. Sociol. 38:67–86 [Google Scholar]
  55. Moody J, McFarland DA, Bender-deMoll S. 2005. Dynamic network visualization: methods for meaning with longitudinal network movies. Am. J. Sociol. 110:1206–41 [Google Scholar]
  56. Moody J, Mucha PJ. 2013. Portrait of political party polarization. Netw. Sci. 1:119–21 [Google Scholar]
  57. Morris M, Kurth AE, Hamilton DT, Moody J, Wakefield S. 2009. Concurrent partnerships and HIV prevalence disparities by race: linking science and public health. Am. J. Public Health 99:1023–31 [Google Scholar]
  58. Moustafa R, Wegman E. 2006. Multivariate continuous data—parallel coordinates. Graphics of Large Datasets A Unwin, C Theus, H Hofmann 143–56 New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  59. Murray S. 2013. Interactive Data Visualization for the Web Sebastopol: O'Reilly
  60. Murrell P. 2011. R Graphics. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall, 2nd ed..
  61. Sarkar D. 2008. Lattice: Multivariate Data Visualization with R New York: Springer
  62. Sletto RF. 1936. A critical study of the criterion of internal consistency in personality scale construction. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1:61–68 [Google Scholar]
  63. Stack S. 1979. The effects of political participation and social party strength on the degree of income inequality. Am. Sociol. Rev. 44:168–71 [Google Scholar]
  64. Tufte ER. 1978. Political Control of the Economy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  65. Tufte ER. 1983. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information Cheshire, CT: Graphics
  66. Tufte ER. 1990. Envisioning Information Cheshire, CT: Graphics
  67. Tufte ER. 1997. Visual Explanations: Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative Cheshire, CT: Graphics
  68. Tufte ER. 2006. Beautiful Evidence Cheshire, CT: Graphics
  69. Tukey JW. 1972. Some graphic and semigraphic displays. Statistical Papers in Honor of George W. Snedecor TA Bancroft 293–316 Ames: Iowa State Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  70. Tukey JW. 1977. Exploratory Data Analysis New York: Addison Wesley
  71. Wainer H. 1984. How to display data badly. Am. Stat. 38:137–47 [Google Scholar]
  72. Wainer H. 2010. Foreword. See Bertin 1967 (2010) pp. ix–x
  73. Wickham H. 2009. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis New York: Springer
  74. Wickham H. 2010. A layered grammar of graphics. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 19:3–28 [Google Scholar]
  75. Wickham H, Cook D, Hofmann H, Buja A. 2010. Graphical inference for Infovis. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 6:973–79 [Google Scholar]
  76. Wilkinson L. 1995 (2005). The Grammar of Graphics New York: Springer, 2nd ed..
  77. Yau N. 2012. Visualize This: The FlowingData Guide to Design, Visualization, and Statistics. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145551
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145551
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error