Since the mid-1970s, the United States has experienced an enormous rise in incarceration and accompanying increases in returning prisoners and in postrelease community correctional supervision. Poor urban communities are disproportionately impacted by these phenomena. This review focuses on two complementary questions regarding incarceration, prisoner reentry, and communities: () whether and how mass incarceration has affected the social and economic structure of American communities, and () how residential neighborhoods affect the social and economic reintegration of returning prisoners. These two questions can be seen as part of a dynamic process involving a pernicious feedback loop in which mass incarceration undermines the structure and social organization of some communities, thus creating more criminogenic environments for returning prisoners and further diminishing their prospects for successful reentry and reintegration.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Literature Cited

  1. Alexander M. 2010. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness New York: New Press [Google Scholar]
  2. Allard SW, Small ML. 2013. Reconsidering the urban disadvantaged: the role of systems, institutions, and organizations. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. (Spec. Issue) 657 Thousand Oaks: Sage [Google Scholar]
  3. Berg M, Huebner B. 2010. Reentry and the ties that bind: an examination of social ties, employment, and recidivism. Justice Q. 1:1–29 [Google Scholar]
  4. Blumstein A, Nagin D, Cohen J. 1978. Deterrence and Incapacitation: Estimating the Effects of Criminal Sanctions on Crime Rates Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Sci. [Google Scholar]
  5. Brehm SS, Brehm JW. 1981. Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
  6. Bruch EE, Atwell J. 2014. Agent based models in empirical social research. Sociol. Methods Res. In press. doi: 10.1177/0049124113506405 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brucker D. 2006. Re-entry to recovery. Crim. Justice Policy Rev. 17:302–13 [Google Scholar]
  8. Burch T. 2014. Effects of imprisonment and community supervision on neighborhood political participation in North Carolina. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 651:184–201 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bursik R, Grasmick HG. 1993. Neighborhoods and Crime: The Dimensions of Effective Community Control New York: Lexington Books [Google Scholar]
  10. Bushway S, Stoll MA, Weiman DF. 2007. Barriers to Reentry? The Labor Market for Released Prisoners in Post-Industrial America New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bushway SD. 2011. Labor markets and crime. Crime and Public Policy JQ Wilson, J Petersilia 183–209 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  12. Carson EA, Golinelli D. 2013. Prisoners in 2012—advanced counts Bur. Justice Stat. Rep. NCJ 242467, July, Off. Justice Progr., US Dep. Justice, Washington, DC. http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/p12ac.pdf [Google Scholar]
  13. Carter BL, Tiffany ST. 1999. Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research. Addiction 94:327–40 [Google Scholar]
  14. Clarke P, Ailshire J, Melendez R, Bader M, Morenoff JD. 2010. Using Google Earth to conduct a neighborhood audit: reliability of a virtual audit instrument. Health Place 1:1224–29 [Google Scholar]
  15. Clear TR. 2007. Imprisoning Communities: How Mass Incarceration Makes Disadvantaged Neighborhoods Worse Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  16. Clear TR, Rose DR, Waring E, Scully K. 2003. Coercive mobility and crime: a preliminary examination of concentrated incarceration and social disorganization. Justice Q. 20:33–64 [Google Scholar]
  17. Comfort M. 2007. Punishment beyond the legal offender. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 3:271–96 [Google Scholar]
  18. Crutchfield RD, Matsueda RL, Drakulich K. 2006. Race, labor markets, and neighborhood violence. The Many Colors of Crime: Inequalities of Race, Ethnicity, and Crime in America RD Peterson, LJ Krivo, J Hagan 199–220 New York: NYU Press [Google Scholar]
  19. Dhondt G. 2012. The bluntness of incarceration: crime and punishment in Tallahassee neighborhoods, 1995 to 2002. Crime Law Soc. Change 57:521–38 [Google Scholar]
  20. Donohue J. 2009. Assessing the relative benefits of incarceration: the overall change over the previous decades and the benefits on the margin. See Raphael & Stoll 2009a 269–342
  21. Douglas-Siegel J, Morenoff JD, Harding DJ. 2012. Parole violations and sanctions in context: how residential neighborhood affects supervision outcomes Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Soc. Criminol., 68th, Chicago, IL [Google Scholar]
  22. Drakulich K, Crutchfield R, Matsueda R, Rose K. 2012. Instability, informal control, and criminogenic situations: community effects of returning prisoners. Crime Law Soc. Change 57:493–519 [Google Scholar]
  23. Durlauf SN, Nagin DS. 2011. Imprisonment and crime: Can both be reduced?. Criminol. Public Policy 10:13–54 [Google Scholar]
  24. Fagan J, West V, Holland J. 2003. Reciprocal effects of crime and incarceration in New York neighborhoods. Fordham Urban Law J. 30:1551–602 [Google Scholar]
  25. Garland D. 2001. Mass Imprisonment: Social Causes and Consequences New York: Sage [Google Scholar]
  26. Glaze LE, Parks E. 2012. Correctional populations in the United States, 2011 Bull. NCJ 239972, Bur. Justice Stat., Off. Justice Progr., US Dep. Justice, Washington, DC. http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cpus11.pdf [Google Scholar]
  27. Gottfredson S, Taylor R. 1988. Community contexts and criminal offenders. Crime and Community Context T Hope, M Shaw 62–82 London: Her Majesty's Station. Off. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gottschalk M. 2008. Hiding in plain sight: American politics and the carceral state. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 11:235–60 [Google Scholar]
  29. Grattet R, Lin J, Petersilia J. 2011. Supervision regimes, risk, and official reactions to parolee deviance. Criminology 49:371–99 [Google Scholar]
  30. Grunwald HE, Lockwood B, Harris PW, Mennis J. 2010. Influences of neighborhood context, individual history and parenting behavior on recidivism among juvenile offenders. J. Youth Adolesc. 39:1067–79 [Google Scholar]
  31. Halaby CN. 2004. Panel models in sociological research: theories into practice. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 30:507–44 [Google Scholar]
  32. Harding DJ. 2003. Counterfactual models of neighborhood effects: the effect of neighborhood poverty on dropping out and teenage pregnancy. Am. J. Sociol. 109:676–719 [Google Scholar]
  33. Harding DJ, Morenoff JD, Herbet CW. 2013. Home is hard to find: neighborhoods, institutions, and the residential trajectories of returning prisoners. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 647:214–36 [Google Scholar]
  34. Harding DJ, Wyse JW, Dobson CC, Morenoff JD. 2014. Making ends meet after prison. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 33:440–70 [Google Scholar]
  35. Harris A, Evans H, Beckett K. 2010. Drawing blood from stones: legal debt and social inequality in the contemporary United States. Am. J. Sociol. 115:1753–99 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hipp J, Jannetta J, Shah R, Turner S. 2009. Parolees' physical closeness to health service providers: a study of California parolees. Health Place 15:679–88 [Google Scholar]
  37. Hipp J, Jannetta J, Shah R, Turner S. 2011. Parolees' physical closeness to social services: a study of California parolees. Crime Delinq. 57:102–29 [Google Scholar]
  38. Hipp JR, Petersilia J, Turner S. 2010. Parolee recidivism in California: the effect of neighborhood context and social service agency characteristics. Criminology 48:947–79 [Google Scholar]
  39. Hipp JR, Yates DK. 2009. Do returning parolees affect neighborhood crime? A case study of Sacramento. Criminology 47:619–56 [Google Scholar]
  40. Holzer HJ, Raphael S, Stoll MA. 2007. The effect of an applicant's criminal history on employer hiring decisions and screening practices: evidence from Los Angeles. See Bushway et al. 2007 117–50
  41. Horney J, Osgood DW, Marshall I. 1995. Criminal careers in the short-term: intraindividual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances. Am. Sociol. Rev. 60:655–73 [Google Scholar]
  42. Huggins C. 2009. Returning home: residential mobility, neighborhood context and recidivism DPhil Diss., Ohio State Univ., Columbus [Google Scholar]
  43. Jacobs D, Jackson AL. 2010. On the politics of imprisonments: a review of systematic findings. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 6:129–49 [Google Scholar]
  44. Johnson R, Raphael S. 2012. How much crime reduction does the marginal prisoner buy?. J. Law Econ. 55:275–310 [Google Scholar]
  45. Justice B, Meares TL. 2014. How the criminal justice system educates citizens. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 651:159–77 [Google Scholar]
  46. Katyal NK. 1997. Deterrence's difficulty. Mich. Law Rev. 95:2385–476 [Google Scholar]
  47. Kirk DS. 2009. A natural experiment on residential change and recidivism: lessons from Hurricane Katrina. Am. Sociol. Rev. 74:484–505 [Google Scholar]
  48. Kirk DS. 2012. Residential change as a turning point in the life course of crime: desistance or temporary cessation?. Criminology 50:329–58 [Google Scholar]
  49. Kirk DS, Matsuda M. 2011. Legal cynicism, collective efficacy, and the ecology of arrest. Criminology 49:443–72 [Google Scholar]
  50. Kubrin CE, Stewart EA. 2006. Predicting who reoffends: the neglected role of neighborhood context in recidivism studies. Criminology 44:165–97 [Google Scholar]
  51. La Vigne N. 2005. Returning Home Illinois Policy Brief: Prisoner Reentry and Residential Mobility Washington, DC: Urban Inst. [Google Scholar]
  52. Laub JH, Sampson RJ. 2001. Understanding desistance from crime. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research1–69 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  53. Lerman AE. 2009. The people prisons make: effects of incarceration on criminal psychology. See Raphael & Stoll 2009a 151–76
  54. Lerman AE, Weaver VM. 2014. Staying out of sight? Concentrated policing and local political action. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 651:202–19 [Google Scholar]
  55. Leverentz A. 2010. People, places, and things: how female ex-prisoners negotiate neighborhood. J. Contemp. Ethnogr. 39:646–81 [Google Scholar]
  56. Liedka RV, Piehl AM, Useem B. 2006. The crime-control effect of incarceration: Does scale matter?. Criminol. Public Policy 5:245–76 [Google Scholar]
  57. Lin J, Grattet R, Petersilia J. 2010. “Back-end sentencing” and reimprisonment: individual, organizational, and community predictors of parole sanctioning decisions. Criminology 48:759–95 [Google Scholar]
  58. Lipsey MW, Cullen FT. 2007. The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: a review of systematic reviews. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 3:297–320 [Google Scholar]
  59. Lynch J, Sabol W. 2004a. Assessing the effects of mass incarceration on informal social control in communities. Criminol. Public Policy 3:267–94 [Google Scholar]
  60. Lynch J, Sabol W. 2004b. Effects of incarceration on informal social control in communities. Imprisoning America: The Social Effects of Mass Incarceration M Patillo, D Weiman, B Western 135–64 New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  61. Massoglia M, Firebaugh G, Warner C. 2012. Racial variation in the effect of incarceration on neighborhood attainment. Am. Sociol. Rev. 78:142–65 [Google Scholar]
  62. Mauer M, Chesney-Lind M. 2002. Invisible Punishment: The Collateral Consequences of Mass Imprisonment New York: New Press [Google Scholar]
  63. Mears DP, Wang X, Hay C, Bales WD. 2008. Social ecology and recidivism: implications for prisoner reentry. Criminology 46:301–40 [Google Scholar]
  64. Morenoff JD, Harding DJ. 2011. Final Technical Report: Neighborhoods, Recidivism, and Employment Among Returning Prisoners Washington, DC: Natl. Inst. Justice [Google Scholar]
  65. Nagin DS, Cullen FT, Jonson CL. 2009. Imprisonment and reoffending. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 38 M Tonry 115–200 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  66. National Research Council 2008. Parole, Desistance from Crime and Community Integration Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press [Google Scholar]
  67. O'Brien DT, Sampson RJ, Winship C. 2013. Econometrics in the Age of Big Data: Measuring and Assessing “Broken Windows” Using Administrative Records Boston: Boston Area Res. Initiat. [Google Scholar]
  68. Odgers CL, Caspi A, Bates CJ, Sampson RJ, Moffitt TE. 2012. Systematic social observation of children's neighborhoods using Google Street View: a reliable and cost-effective method. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 53:1009–17 [Google Scholar]
  69. Pager D. 2007. Marked: Race, Crime, and Finding Work in an Era of Mass Incarceration Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  70. Peterson RD, Krivo LJ. 2010. Divergent Social Worlds: Neighborhood Crime and the Racial-Spatial Divide New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  71. Pettit B, Western B. 2004. Mass imprisonment and the life course: race and class inequality in U.S. incarceration. Am. Sociol. Rev. 69:151–69 [Google Scholar]
  72. Pew Center on the States 2008. One in 100: Behind Bars in America 2008 Washington, DC: Pew Charit. Trusts [Google Scholar]
  73. Pew Center on the States 2009. One in 31: The Long Reach of American Corrections Washington, DC: Pew Charit. Trusts [Google Scholar]
  74. Raphael S. 2011. Incarceration and prisoner reentry in the United States. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 635:192–215 [Google Scholar]
  75. Raphael S, Stoll MA. 2009a. Do Prisons Make Us Safer? The Benefits and Costs of the Prison Boom New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  76. Raphael S, Stoll MA. 2009b. Why are so many Americans in prison?. See Raphael & Stoll 2009a 27–72
  77. Raphael S, Weiman DF. 2007. The impact of local labor-market conditions on the likelihood that parolees are returned to custody. See Bushway et al. 2007 304–32
  78. Raudenbush SW, Sampson RJ. 1999. Econometrics: toward a science of assessing ecological settings, with application to the systematic social observation of neighborhoods. Sociol. Methodol. 29:1–41 [Google Scholar]
  79. Renauer B, Cunningham W. 2006. Tipping the scales of justice: the effect of overincarceration on neighborhood violence. Crim. Justice Policy Rev. 17:362–79 [Google Scholar]
  80. Rose DR, Clear TR. 1998. Incarceration, social capital, and crime: implications for social disorganization theory. Criminology 36:441–79 [Google Scholar]
  81. Sabol WJ. 2007. Local labor market conditions and post-prison employment experiences of offenders released from Ohio state prisons. See Bushway et al. 2007 257–303
  82. Sampson RJ. 1999. What “community” supplies. Urban Problems and Community Development RF Ferguson, WT Dickens 241–92 Washington, DC: Brookings Inst. Press [Google Scholar]
  83. Sampson RJ. 2011. The incarceration ledger. Criminol. Public Policy 10:819–28 [Google Scholar]
  84. Sampson RJ, Loeffler C. 2010. Punishment's place: the local concentration of mass incarceration. Daedalus 139:20–31 [Google Scholar]
  85. Sampson RJ, Morenoff JD, Felton E. 1999. Beyond social capital: spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. Am. Sociol. Rev. 64:633–60 [Google Scholar]
  86. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW. 1999. Systematic social observation of public spaces: a new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. Am. J. Sociol. 105:603–51 [Google Scholar]
  87. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F. 1997. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 277:918–24 [Google Scholar]
  88. Schnittker J. 2014. The psychological dimensions and the social consequences of incarceration. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 651:122–38 [Google Scholar]
  89. Schnittker J, John A. 2007. Enduring stigma: the long-term effects of incarceration on health. J. Health Soc. Behav. 48:115–30 [Google Scholar]
  90. Schnittker J, Massoglia M, Uggen C. 2011. Incarceration and the health of the African American community. DuBois Rev. 8:1–9 [Google Scholar]
  91. Schnittker J, Massoglia M, Uggen C. 2012. Out and down: incarceration and psychiatric disorders. J. Health Soc. Behav. 53:448–64 [Google Scholar]
  92. Shaw CR, McKay HD. 1969 (1942). Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas: A Study of Rates of Delinquency in Relation to Differential Characteristics of Local Communities in American Cities Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  93. Small ML, McDermott M. 2006. The presence of organizational resources in poor urban neighborhoods: an analysis of average and contextual effects. Soc. Forces 84:1697–724 [Google Scholar]
  94. Smith DA. 1996. Neighborhood context of police behavior. Crime Justice 8:313–41 [Google Scholar]
  95. Spelman W. 2000. What recent studies do (and don't) tell us about imprisonment and crime. Crime Justice 27:419–94 [Google Scholar]
  96. Stahler GJ, Mennis J, Belenko S, Welsh WN, Hiller ML, Zajac G. 2013. Predicting recidivism for released state prison offenders: examining the influence of individual and neighborhood characteristics and spatial contagion on the likelihood of reincarceration. Crim. Justice Behav. 40:690–711 [Google Scholar]
  97. Sun IY, Payne BK, Wu Y. 2008. The impact of situational factors, officer characteristics, and neighborhood context on police behavior: a multilevel analysis. J. Crim. Justice 36:22–32 [Google Scholar]
  98. Swaroop S, Morenoff J. 2005. Building community: the neighborhood context of social organization. Soc. Forces 84:1665–93 [Google Scholar]
  99. Thacher D. 2010. The distribution of police protection. J. Quant. Criminol. 27:275–98 [Google Scholar]
  100. Tillyer MS, Vose B. 2011. Social ecology, individual risk, and recidivism: a multilevel examination of main and moderating influences. J. Crim. Justice 39:452–59 [Google Scholar]
  101. Tittle CR, Paternoster R. 2000. Social Deviance and Crime: An Organizational and Theoretical Approach Los Angeles: Roxbury [Google Scholar]
  102. Travis J. 2005. But They All Come Back: Facing the Challenges of Prisoner Reentry Washington, DC: Urban Inst. Press [Google Scholar]
  103. Tyler TR, Fagan J. 2008. Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities. Ohio St. J. Crim. Law 6:231–75 [Google Scholar]
  104. Visher C, Farrell J. 2005. Chicago Communities and Prisoner Reentry Washington, DC: Urban Inst. Press [Google Scholar]
  105. Visher C, La Vigne NG, Travis J. 2004. Returning Home: Understanding the Challenges of Prisoner Reentry Washington, DC: Urban Inst. Justice Policy Cent. [Google Scholar]
  106. Visher CA, Travis J. 2003. Transitions from prison to community: understanding individual pathways. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 29:89–113 [Google Scholar]
  107. Wacquant L. 2001. Deadly symbiosis: when ghetto and prison meet and mesh. Punishm. Soc. 3:95–133 [Google Scholar]
  108. Wacquant L. 2010. Class, race & hyperincarceration in revanchist America. Daedalus 139:74–90 [Google Scholar]
  109. Wakefield S, Uggen C. 2010. Incarceration and stratification. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36:387–406 [Google Scholar]
  110. Wallace D, Papachristos AV. 2012. Recidivism and the availability of health care organizations. Justice Q. 31:588–608 [Google Scholar]
  111. Wang X, Mears DP, Bales WD. 2010. Race-specific employment contexts and recidivism. Criminology 48:1171–211 [Google Scholar]
  112. Weaver VM, Lerman AE. 2010. Political consequences of the carceral state. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 104:817–33 [Google Scholar]
  113. Wehrman MM. 2010. Race, concentrated disadvantage, and recidivism: a test of interaction effects. J. Crim. Justice 38:538–44 [Google Scholar]
  114. Weisberg R, Petersilia J. 2010. The dangers of pyrrhic victories against mass incarceration. Daedalus 139:124–33 [Google Scholar]
  115. West HC, Sabol WJ, Greenman SJ. 2010. Prisoners in 2009 Bull. NCJ 231675, Bur. Justice Stat., Off. Justice Progr., US Dep. Justice, Washington DC [Google Scholar]
  116. Western B. 2007. Punishment and Inequality in America New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  117. Wildeman C, Muller C. 2012. Mass imprisonment and inequality in health and family life. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 8:11–30 [Google Scholar]
  118. Wilson WJ. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  119. Wilson WJ. 1996. When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor New York: Knopf [Google Scholar]
  120. Wodtke GT, Harding DJ, Elwert F. 2011. Neighborhood effects in temporal perspective. Am. Sociol. Rev. 76:716–36 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error