Interorganizational relationships connect people affiliated with organizations rather than corporate actors themselves. The managers and owners of organizations therefore do not always control these connections and consequently often cannot profit from them. We discuss the circumstances under which individuals (versus organizations) own these relationships (and therefore also the social capital generated by them). Three factors increase the odds of individual ownership: () the extent to which the resources valued by alters belong to the individual (rather than the organization), () the degree to which alters feel greater indebtedness to the individual than to the organization, and () the extent to which relationships involve emotional attachment. We discuss the implications of the locus of ownership, argue that these distinctions can help explain many results that appear inconsistent on the surface, and call for future research to pay closer attention to these issues.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Literature Cited

  1. Adegbesan JA, Higgins MJ. 2011. The intra-alliance division of value created through collaboration. Strateg. Manag. J. 32:187–211 [Google Scholar]
  2. Agrawal A, Jaffe JF. 2000. The post-merger performance puzzle. Advances in Mergers & Acquisitions 1 C Cooper, A Gregory 7–41 Bingley, UK: Emerald Group [Google Scholar]
  3. Agrawal A, Jaffe JF, Mandelker GN. 1992. The post-merger performance of acquiring firms: a re-examination of an anomaly. J. Finance 47:41605–21 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahuja G. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study. Adm. Sci. Q. 45:3425–55 [Google Scholar]
  5. Allen TJ. 1977. Managing the Flow of Technology Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  6. Arikan AM. 2002. Does it pay-off to capture intangible assets through mergers and acquisitions. Acad. Manag. Proc. 2002:R1–6 [Google Scholar]
  7. Baker WE, Faulkner RR. 1993. The social organization of a conspiracy: illegal networks in the heavy electrical equipment industry. Am. Sociol. Rev. 58:837–60 [Google Scholar]
  8. Baker WE, Faulkner RR, Fisher GA. 1998. Hazards of the market: the continuity and dissolution of interorganizational market relationships. Am. Sociol. Rev. 63:147–77 [Google Scholar]
  9. Barden J, Mitchell W. 2007. Disentangling the influences of leaders' relational embeddedness on interorganizational exchange. Acad. Manag. J. 50:1440–61 [Google Scholar]
  10. Beatty SE, Mayer M, Coleman JE, Reynolds KE, Lee J. 1996. Customer-sales associate retail relationships. J. Retail. 72:223–47 [Google Scholar]
  11. Becker GS. 1964. Human Capital New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  12. Beckman CM, Phillips DJ. 2005. Interorganizational determinants of promotion: client leadership and the attainment of women attorneys. Am. Sociol. Rev. 70:678–701 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bendapudi N, Leone RP. 2002. Managing business-to-business customer relationships following key contact employee turnover in a vendor firm. J. Mark. 66:83–101 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bidwell M, Fernandez-Mateo I. 2010. Relationship duration and returns to brokerage in the staffing sector. Organ. Sci. 21:1141–58 [Google Scholar]
  15. Biong H, Ulvnes AM. 2011. If the supplier's human capital walks away, where would the customer go?. J. Bus.-to-Bus. Mark. 18:223–52 [Google Scholar]
  16. Blau P. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life New York: Wiley
  17. Bloch F, Jackson MO. 2006. Definitions of equilibrium in network formation games. Int. J. Game Theory 34:305–18 [Google Scholar]
  18. Blyler M, Coff RW. 2003. Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: ties that split pies. Strateg. Manag. J. 24:677–86 [Google Scholar]
  19. Boschma RA, Lambooy JG. 2002. Knowledge, market structure, and economic coordination: Dynamics of industrial districts. Growth Change 33:291–311 [Google Scholar]
  20. Bouty I. 2000. Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries. Acad. Manag. J. 43:50–65 [Google Scholar]
  21. Bradley M, Desai A, Kim EH. 1988. Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring firms. J. Financ. Econ. 21:13–40 [Google Scholar]
  22. Briscoe F, Tsai W. 2011. Overcoming relational inertia: how organizational members respond to acquisition events in a law firm. Adm. Sci. Q. 56:408–40 [Google Scholar]
  23. Broschak JP. 2004. Managers' mobility and market interface: the effect of managers' career mobility on the dissolution of market ties. Adm. Sci. Q. 49:608–40 [Google Scholar]
  24. Broschak JP, Block E. 2013. With or without you: When does managerial exit matter for the dissolution of dyadic market ties?. Acad. Manag. J. In press. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0169
  25. Broschak JP, Niehans KM. 2006. Social structure, employee mobility, and the circulation of client ties. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 24 Professional Service Firms R Greenwood, R Suddaby 369–401 Bingley, UK: Emerald Group [Google Scholar]
  26. Brüderl J, Preisendörfer P. 1998. Network support and the success of newly founded businesses. Small Bus. Econ. 10:213–25 [Google Scholar]
  27. Burt RS. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  28. Burt RS. 1997. The contingent value of social capital. Adm. Sci. Q. 42:339–65 [Google Scholar]
  29. Burt RS. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. Am. J. Sociol. 110:2349–99 [Google Scholar]
  30. Canales R, Greenberg J. 2012. A matter of (relational) style: loan officer consistency in contract enforcement in microfinance Work. Pap., Yale Sch. Manag.
  31. Capron L, Hulland J. 1999. Redeployment of brands, sales forces, and marketing expertise following horizontal acquisitions: a resource-based view. J. Mark. 63:41–59 [Google Scholar]
  32. Coleman JS. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Sociol. 94:S95–120 [Google Scholar]
  33. Coleman JS, Katz E, Menzel H. 1957. The diffusion of innovation among physicians. Sociometry 20:253–70 [Google Scholar]
  34. Czepiel JA. 1990. Service encounters and service relationships: implications for research. J. Bus. Res. 20:13–21 [Google Scholar]
  35. Dahl MS, Sorenson O. 2010. The social attachment to place. Soc. Forces 89:633–58 [Google Scholar]
  36. Dahl MS, Sorenson O. 2012. Home sweet home: entrepreneurs' location choices and the performance of their ventures. Manag. Sci. 58:1059–71 [Google Scholar]
  37. Dahl MS, Sorenson O. 2014. The who, why and how of spinoffs. Ind. Corp. Change 23661–88
  38. DiMaggio P, Louch H. 1998. Socially embedded consumer transactions: For what kinds of purchases do people most often use networks?. Am. Sociol. Rev. 63:619–37 [Google Scholar]
  39. Doney PM, Cannon JP. 1997. An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. J. Mark. 61:35–51 [Google Scholar]
  40. Economist 2006. Time of his life. Economist Feb. 9. http://www.economist.com/node/5492176
  41. Emerson RM. 1976. Social exchange theory. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2:335–62 [Google Scholar]
  42. Erikson E, Bearman P. 2006. Malfeasance and the foundations for global trade: the structure of English trade in the East Indies, 1601–1833. Am. J. Sociol. 112:195–230 [Google Scholar]
  43. Ertug G, Castellucci F. 2013. Getting what you need: how reputation and status affect team performance, hiring, and salaries in the NBA. Acad. Manag. J. 56:407–31 [Google Scholar]
  44. Fernandez RM, Castilla EJ, Moore P. 2000. Social capital at work: networks and employment at a phone center. Am. J. Sociol. 105:1288–356 [Google Scholar]
  45. Figueiredo O, Guimarães P, Woodward D. 2002. Home-field advantage: location decisions of Portuguese entrepreneurs. J. Urban Econ. 52:341–61 [Google Scholar]
  46. Freeman J. 1983. Entrepreneurs as organizational products: semiconductor firms and venture capital firms. Adv. Study Entrep. Innov. Econ. Growth 1:33–52 [Google Scholar]
  47. Freitas IMB, Geuna A, Rossi F. 2013. Finding the right partners: institutional and personal modes of governance of university-industry interactions. Res. Policy 42:50–62 [Google Scholar]
  48. Galenter M, Henderson W. 2008. The elastic tournament: the second transformation of the big law firm. Stanford Law Rev. 60:1867–930 [Google Scholar]
  49. Geertz C. 1978. The bazaar economy: information and search in peasant marketing. Am. Econ. Rev. 68:28–32 [Google Scholar]
  50. Goldberg E. 2007. The departed: Is shedding partners the right way to improve profitability?. Am. Lawyer May:145–49
  51. Gouldner AW. 1960. The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. Am. Sociol. Rev. 25:161–79 [Google Scholar]
  52. Granovetter M. 1974. Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers New York: Harvard Univ. Press
  53. Granovetter MS. 1973. The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78:1360–80 [Google Scholar]
  54. Granovetter MS. 1985. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 91:481–510 [Google Scholar]
  55. Grossman SJ, Hart O. 1986. The costs and benefits of ownership: a theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Polit. Econ. 94:691–719 [Google Scholar]
  56. Hansen MT. 1999. The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Adm. Sci. Q. 44:82–111 [Google Scholar]
  57. Haunschild PR. 1993. Interorganizational imitation: the impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Adm. Sci. Q. 38:564–92 [Google Scholar]
  58. Ingram P, Lifschitz A. 2006. Kinship in the shadow of the corporation: the interbuilder network in Clyde River shipbuilding, 1711–1990. Am. Sociol. Rev. 71:334–52 [Google Scholar]
  59. Ingram P, Roberts PW. 2000. Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. Am. J. Sociol. 106:387–423 [Google Scholar]
  60. Kalnins A, Chung W. 2006. Social capital, geography, and survival: Gujarati immigrant entrepreneurs in the U.S. lodging industry. Manag. Sci. 52:233–47 [Google Scholar]
  61. Keister LA. 2001. Exchange structures in transition: lending and trade relations in Chinese business groups. Am. Sociol. Rev. 66:336–60 [Google Scholar]
  62. Khanna T, Rivkin JW. 2006. Interorganizational ties and business group boundaries: evidence from an emerging economy. Organ. Sci. 17:333–52 [Google Scholar]
  63. Kiser E. 1991. Comparing varieties of agency theory in political science, economics and sociology: an illustration from state policy implementation. Sociol. Theory 17:146–70 [Google Scholar]
  64. Kiser E, Schneider J. 1994. Bureaucracy and efficiency: an analysis of taxation in early modern Prussia. Am. Sociol. Rev. 59:187–204 [Google Scholar]
  65. Knoke D. 1999. Organizational networks and corporate social capital. Corporate Social Capital and Liability RTAJ Leenders, SM Gabbay 17–42 Norwell, MA: Kluwer Acad. [Google Scholar]
  66. Kollock P. 1994. The emergence of exchange structures: an experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust. Am. J. Sociol. 100:313–45 [Google Scholar]
  67. Kreps DM, Wilson R. 1982. Reputation and imperfect information. J. Econ. Theory 27:253–79 [Google Scholar]
  68. Langetieg TC. 1978. An application of a three-factor performance index to measure stockholder gains from merger. J. Financ. Econ. 6:4365–83 [Google Scholar]
  69. Lawler EJ. 2001. An affect theory of social exchange. Am. J. Sociol. 107:321–52 [Google Scholar]
  70. Lawler EJ, Yoon J. 1996. Commitment in exchange relations: test of a theory of relational cohesion. Am. Sociol. Rev. 61:89–108 [Google Scholar]
  71. Lazega E, Pattison PE. 1999. Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations: a case study. Soc. Netw. 21:67–90 [Google Scholar]
  72. Lewis JD, Weigert AJ. 1985. Trust as a social reality. Soc. Forces 63:966–85 [Google Scholar]
  73. Light IH. 1972. Ethnic Enterprise in America: Business and Welfare Among Chinese, Japanese, and Blacks Berkeley/Los Angeles: Univ. Calif. Press
  74. Løvås B, Sorenson O. 2008. The mobilization of scarce resources. Adv. Strateg. Manag. 25:361–89 [Google Scholar]
  75. Lovett S, Harrison D, Virick M. 1997. Managing the boundary spanner-customer turnover connection. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 7:405–24 [Google Scholar]
  76. Macaulay S. 1963. Non-contractual relations in business: a preliminary study. Am. Sociol. Rev. 28:55–67 [Google Scholar]
  77. Macintosh G, Lockshin LS. 1997. Retail relationships and store loyalty: a multi-level perspective. Int. J. Res. Mark. 14:487–97 [Google Scholar]
  78. Malinowski B. 1922. Argonauts of the Western Pacific London: Routledge
  79. Marx M. 2011. The firm strikes back: non-compete agreements and the mobility of technical professionals. Am. Sociol. Rev. 76:695–712 [Google Scholar]
  80. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. 2001. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27:415–44 [Google Scholar]
  81. Milgrom P, Roberts J. 1992. Economics, Organization and Management New York: Prentice Hall
  82. Molm LD. 2010. The structure of reciprocity. Soc. Psychol. Q. 73:119–31 [Google Scholar]
  83. Molm LD, Takahashi N, Peterson G. 2000. Risk and trust in social exchange: an experimental test of a classical proposition. Am. J. Sociol. 105:1396–427 [Google Scholar]
  84. Owen-Smith J, Powell WW. 2004. Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: the effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ. Sci. 15:5–21 [Google Scholar]
  85. Palmatier RW, Scheer LK, Houston MB, Evans K, Gopalakrishna S. 2007. Use of relationship marketing programs in building customer-salesperson and customer-firm relationships: differential influences of financial outcomes. Int. J. Res. Mark. 24:210–23 [Google Scholar]
  86. Paruchuri S. 2010. Intraorganizational networks, interorganizational networks, and the impact of central inventors: a longitudinal study of pharmaceutical firms. Organ. Sci. 21:63–80 [Google Scholar]
  87. Phillips DJ. 2002. A genealogical approach to organizational life chances: the parent-progeny transfer among Silicon Valley law firms. Adm. Sci. Q. 47:474–506 [Google Scholar]
  88. Pina-Stranger Á, Lazega E. 2011. Bringing personalized ties back in: their added value for biotech entrepreneurs and venture capitalists in interorganizational networks. Sociol. Q. 52:268–92 [Google Scholar]
  89. Poppo L, Zenger T. 2002. Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?. Strateg. Manag. J. 23:707–25 [Google Scholar]
  90. Portes A, Sensenbrenner J. 1993. Embeddedness and immigration: notes on the social determinants of economic action. Am. J. Sociol. 98:1320–50 [Google Scholar]
  91. Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Adm. Sci. Q. 41:116–45 [Google Scholar]
  92. Rajan RG, Wulf J. 2006. The flattening firm: evidence from panel data on the changing nature of corporate hierarchies. Rev. Econ. Stat. 88:759–73 [Google Scholar]
  93. Raub W, Weesie J. 1990. Reputation and efficiency in social interactions: an example of network effects. Am. J. Sociol. 96:626–54 [Google Scholar]
  94. Rider CI. 2012. How employees' prior affiliations constrain organizational network change: a study of U.S. venture capital and private equity. Adm. Sci. Q. 57:453–83 [Google Scholar]
  95. Rogan M. 2014. Executive departures without client losses: the role of multiplex ties in exchange partner retention. Acad. Manag. J. 57563–84
  96. Rogan M, Mors L. 2009. The investment of individual resources in professional relationships. Acad. Manag. Proc. 2009:11–6 doi: 10.5465/ambpp.2009.44257916 [Google Scholar]
  97. Ruef M. 2002. Strong ties, weak ties and islands: structural and cultural predictors of organizational innovation. Ind. Corp. Change 11:427–49 [Google Scholar]
  98. Ryall MD, Sorenson O. 2007. Brokers and competitive advantage. Manag. Sci. 53:566–83 [Google Scholar]
  99. Ryan B, Gross NC. 1943. The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociol. 8:15–24 [Google Scholar]
  100. Ryan E. 2013. Ireland: followers, friends and connections—the ownership of social media contacts. Mondaq June 20. http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=246238
  101. Samila S, Sorenson O. 2011. Noncompete covenants: incentives to innovate or impediments to growth. Manag. Sci. 57:425–38 [Google Scholar]
  102. Seabright MA, Levinthal DA, Fichman M. 1992. Role of individual attachments in the dissolution of interorganizational relationships. Acad. Manag. J. 35:122–60 [Google Scholar]
  103. Shane S, Stuart TE. 2002. Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Manag. Sci. 48:154–70 [Google Scholar]
  104. Shrum W. 1990. Status incongruence among boundary spanners—structure, exchange, and conflict. Am. Sociol. Rev. 55:496–511 [Google Scholar]
  105. Simmel G. 1950. The triad. The Sociology of Georg Simmel KH Wolff 145–69 New York: Free Press [Google Scholar]
  106. Sørensen JB. 1999. Executive migration and interorganizational competition. Soc. Sci. Res. 28:289–315 [Google Scholar]
  107. Sorenson O, Audia PG. 2000. The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. Am. J. Sociol. 106:2424–62 [Google Scholar]
  108. Sorenson O, Rivkin JW, Fleming L. 2006. Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Res. Policy 35:994–1017 [Google Scholar]
  109. Sorenson O, Waguespack DM. 2006. Social structure and exchange: self-confirming dynamics in Hollywood. Adm. Sci. Q. 51:4560–89 [Google Scholar]
  110. Stovel K, Savage M. 2006. Mergers and mobility: organization growth and the origins of career migration at Lloyds Bank. Am. J. Sociol. 111:1080–121 [Google Scholar]
  111. Stuart TE, Sorenson O. 2003. Liquidity events and the geographic distribution of entrepreneurial activity. Adm. Sci. Q. 48:175–201 [Google Scholar]
  112. Tax SS, Brown SW. 1998. Recovering and learning from service failure. Sloan Manag. Rev. 40:75–88 [Google Scholar]
  113. Trapido D. 2013. Dual signals: how competition makes or breaks interfirm social ties. Organ. Sci. 24:498–512 [Google Scholar]
  114. Uzzi B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. Am. Sociol. Rev. 61:4674–98 [Google Scholar]
  115. Uzzi B. 1999. Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: how social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. Am. Sociol. Rev. 64:481–505 [Google Scholar]
  116. Uzzi B, Lancaster R. 2004. Embeddedness and price formation in the corporate law market. Am. Sociol. Rev. 69:319–44 [Google Scholar]
  117. Whyte WF. 1964. Street Corner Society Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  118. Zaheer A, McEvily B, Perrone V. 1998. Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organ. Sci. 9:141–59 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error