Applying a gender perspective to cities reveals how spatial structure and social structure are mutually constitutive. This article reviews the ways cities have reflected and reinforced gender relations in the United States from the turn of the twentieth century to the present. First, I discuss ways in which women in industrial cities challenged the ideology of separate spheres. Next, I suggest that the post–World War II city was shaped by an era of high patriarchy similar to the architectural high modernism of the same era, and in the third section, I explore how that urban structure limited women's opportunities outside the home. In the fourth part, I examine changes in the concept of gender as it expanded beyond masculine and feminine categories to include lesbians, gays, and transgender individuals. The article ends with a review of how women's and gay rights movements, gentrification, and planning practices have shaped a more gender-neutral contemporary metropolis.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Literature Cited

  1. Adler S, Brenner J. 1992. Gender and space: lesbians and gay men in the city. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 16:24–34 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahrentzen S. 2003. The space between the studs: feminism and architecture. Signs: J. Women Cult. Soc. 29:1179–206 [Google Scholar]
  3. Andrew C, Milroy BM. 1988. Life Spaces: Gender, Household, Employment Vancouver: Univ. B.C. Press
  4. Appleton L. 1995. The gender regimes of American cities. Gender in Urban Research JA Garber, RS Turner 44–59 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
  5. Ardener S. 1981. Women and Space: Ground Rules and Social Maps London: Croom Helm
  6. Baxandall R, Ewen E. 2000. Picture Windows: How the Suburbs Happened New York: Basic Books
  7. Bevacqua M. 2000. Rape on the Public Agenda: Feminism and the Politics of Sexual Assault Boston: Northeast. Univ. Press
  8. Bondi L. 1998. Gender, class, and urban space: public and private space in contemporary urban landscapes. Urban Geogr. 19:2160–85 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bondi L, Rose D. 2003. Constructing gender, constructing the urban: a review of Anglo-American feminist urban geography. Gend. Place Cult. 10:3229–45 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown C. 1987. The new patriarchy. Hidden Aspects of Women's Work C Bose, R Feldberg, N Sokoloff 137–60 New York: Praeger [Google Scholar]
  11. Brownmiller S. 1975. Against Our Will: Men, Women, and Rape New York: Simon & Schuster
  12. Burke KJ. 2012. A space apart: Kairos and masculine possibility in retreats of adolescents. J. Men Masculinities Spiritual. 6:277–93 [Google Scholar]
  13. Butler J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity New York: Routledge
  14. Calthorpe P. 1993. The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream New York: Princeton Archit. Press
  15. Castells M. 1983. The City and the Grassroots: A Cross-Cultural Theory of Urban Social Movements. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  16. Castells M, Murphy K. 1982. Cultural identity and urban structure: the spatial organization of San Francisco's gay community. Urban Policy Under Capitalism N Fainstein, S Fainstein 237–60 Beverly Hills: Sage [Google Scholar]
  17. Chatman DG. 2013. Does TOD need the T? On the importance of factors other than rail access. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 79:117–31 [Google Scholar]
  18. Colomina B. 1992. Sexuality and Space New York: Princeton Archit. Press
  19. Connell C. 2010. Doing, undoing, or redoing gender? Learning from the workplace experiences of transpeople. Gend. Soc. 24:131–55 [Google Scholar]
  20. Connell RW, Messerschmidt JW. 2005. Hegemonic masculinity: rethinking the concept. Gend. Soc. 19:6829–59 [Google Scholar]
  21. Davis M. 1990. City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles New York: Vintage
  22. Davis SN, Greenstein TN. 2009. Gender ideology: components, predictors, and consequences. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 35:87–105 [Google Scholar]
  23. D'Emilio J. 1983. Capitalism and gay identity. Powers of Desire: The Politics of Sexuality A Snitow, C Stansell, S Thompson 100–16 New York: Mon. Rev. [Google Scholar]
  24. da Costa Meyer E. 2000. La donna è mobile. Gender and Architecture L Durning, R Wrigley 155–69 New York: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  25. Dear M. 2000. The Postmodern Urban Condition Oxford: Blackwell
  26. Deutsch FM. 2007. Undoing gender. Gend. Soc. 21:1106–27 [Google Scholar]
  27. Deutsch S. 2000. Women and the City: Gender, Space, and Power in Boston, 1870–1940 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  28. Doan P. 2007. Queers in the American city: transgendered perceptions of urban space. Gend. Place Cult. 14:157–74 [Google Scholar]
  29. Doan P. 2010. The tyranny of gendered spaces—reflections from beyond the gender dichotomy. Gend. Place Cult. 17:5635–54 [Google Scholar]
  30. Doan P. 2011. Queerying Planning: Challenging Heteronormative Assumptions and Reframing Planning Practice Surrey, UK: Ashgate
  31. Doan P, Higgins H. 2011. The demise of queer space? Resurgent gentrification and the assimilation of LGBT neighborhoods. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 31:16–25 [Google Scholar]
  32. Domosh M, Seager J. 2001. Putting Women in Place: Feminist Geographers Make Sense of the World New York: Guilford
  33. Duany A, Plater-Zyberk E, Speck J. 2000. American Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream New York: North Point
  34. Dubrow G. 2011. Lavender landmarks revisited: advancing an LGBT preservation agenda. See Doan 2011 53–70
  35. Duncan N. 1996. Bodyspace: Destabilizing Geographies of Gender and Sexuality New York: Routledge
  36. Fainstein NI, Fainstein SS. 1974. Urban Political Movements: The Search for Power by Minority Groups in American Cities Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
  37. Fainstein SS, Servon LJ. 2005. Gender and Planning New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press
  38. Fava S. 1980. Women's place in the new suburbia. See Wekerle et al. 1980 129–50
  39. Flanagan MA. 2002. Seeing With Their Hearts: Chicago Women and the Vision of the Good City, 1871–1933 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  40. Florida R. 2005. Cities and the Creative Class New York: Routledge
  41. Forsyth A. 1997. ‘Out’ in the valley. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 21:36–60 [Google Scholar]
  42. Forsyth A. 2011. Queerying planning practice: understanding non-conformist populations. See Doan 2011 21–51
  43. Franck KA, Ahrentzen S. 1991. New Households, New Housing New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold
  44. Frey WH, Wilson JH, Berube A, Singer A. 2006. Tracking American trends into the twenty-first century: a field guide to the new metropolitan and micropolitan definitions. Redefining Urban and Suburban America: Evidence from Census 2000 3 A Berube, B Katz, RE Lang 191–234 Washington, DC: Brookings Inst. [Google Scholar]
  45. Gelb J, Gittell M. 1986. Seeking equality: the role of activist women in cities. The Egalitarian City: Issues of Rights, Distribution, Access, and Power JK Boles 93–109 New York: Praeger [Google Scholar]
  46. Gieryn T. 2000. A space for place in sociology. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 26:463–96 [Google Scholar]
  47. Ginsburg R. 2011. At Home with Apartheid: The Hidden Landscapes of Domestic Service in Johannesburg Charlottesville: Univ. Virginia Press
  48. Gordon MT, Riger S, LeBailey RK, Heath L. 1981. Crime, women, and the quality of urban life. See Stimpson et al. 1981 141–57
  49. Greed CH. 1994. Women and Planning: Creating Gendered Realities New York: Routledge
  50. Hanson S, Pratt G. 1995. Gender, Work, and Space New York: Routledge
  51. Harvey D. 1973. Social Justice and the City Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
  52. Hayden D. 1981a. The Grand Domestic Revolution: A History of Feminist Designs for American Homes, Neighborhoods, and Cities Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  53. Hayden D. 1981b. What would a non-sexist city be like? Speculations on housing, urban design, and human work. See Stimpson et al. 1981 167–84
  54. Hayden D. 1984. Redesigning the American Dream: The Future of Housing, Work, and Family Life New York: Norton
  55. Heap C. 2003. The city as a sexual laboratory: the queer heritage of the Chicago School. Qual. Sociol. 26:4457–90 [Google Scholar]
  56. Hertz B-S, Eisenberg E, Knauer LM. 1997. Queer spaces in New York City: places of struggle/places of strength. See Ingram et al. 1997 357–70
  57. Hirt S. 2008. Stuck in the suburbs? Gendered perspectives on living at the edge of the post-communist city. Cities 25:340–54 [Google Scholar]
  58. Humphreys L. 1975. Tearoom Trade: Impersonal Sex in Public Places Chicago: Aldine
  59. Hurst M, Zambrana RE. 1981. The health careers of urban women: a study in East Harlem. See Stimpson et al. 1981 109–23
  60. Ingram GB. 1997a. Marginality and the landscape of erotic alien(n)ations. See Ingram et al. 1997 27–52
  61. Ingram GB. 1997b. “Open” space as strategic queer sites. See Ingram et al. 1997 95–126
  62. Ingram GB, Bouthillette A-M, Retter Y. 1997. Queers in Space: Communities, Public Places, Sites of Resistance. Seattle: Bay
  63. Isenberg A. 2004. Downtown America: A History of the Place and the People Who Made It Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  64. Jarvis H, Kantor P, Cloke J. 2009. Cities and Gender New York: Routledge
  65. Jurik NC, Siemsen C. 2009. “Doing gender” as canon or agenda: a symposium on West and Zimmerman. Gend. Soc. 23:172–75 [Google Scholar]
  66. Keller S. 1981. Women and children in a planned community. Building for Women S Keller 67–76 Lexington, MA: Heath [Google Scholar]
  67. Kennedy EL, Davis MD. 1993. . Boots of Leather, Slippers of Gold: The History of a Lesbian Community New York: Routledge
  68. Kimmel M. 2008. Guyland: The Perilous World Where Boys Become Men. New York: Harper
  69. Knopp L. 1990. Some theoretical implications of gay involvement in an urban land market. Polit. Geogr. Q. 9:337–52 [Google Scholar]
  70. Knopp L. 2007. From lesbian and gay to queer geographies: pasts, prospects, and possibilities. Geographies of Sexualities: Theories, Practices, and Politics K Browne, J Lim, G Brown 21–28 Burlington, VT: Ashgate [Google Scholar]
  71. Krysan M, Farley R. 2002. The residential preferences of blacks: Do they explain persistent segregation?. Soc. Forces 80:3937–79 [Google Scholar]
  72. Lang RE, Dhavale D. 2006. Micropolitan America: a brand new geography. Redefining Urban and Suburban America: Evidence from Census 2000 3 A Berube, B Katz, RE Lang 237–58 Washington, DC: Brookings Inst. [Google Scholar]
  73. Lauria M, Knopp L. 1985. Toward an analysis of the role of gay communities in the urban renaissance. Urban Geogr. 6:152–69 [Google Scholar]
  74. Leavitt J, Saegert S. 1990. From Abandonment to Hope: Community-Households in Harlem New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  75. Lefebvre H. 1991. The Production of Space Oxford: Blackwell
  76. Leff L. 2013. ‘M’ or ‘F’? Outdated IDs worry transgender individuals. Washington Post June 15, p. A5
  77. Logan JR. 2012. Making a place for space: spatial thinking in social science. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 38:507–24 [Google Scholar]
  78. Lupkin P. 2010. Manhood Factories: YMCA Architecture and the Making of Modern Urban Culture Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
  79. Markusen AR. 1981. City spatial structure, women's household work, and national urban policy. See Stimpson et al. 1981 20–41
  80. Massey D. 1996. Masculinity, dualisms, and high technology. See Duncan 1996 109–26
  81. Massey DS, Denton NA. 1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  82. Matrix 1984. Making Space: Women and the Man-Made Environment London: Pluto
  83. May ET. 2008. Homeward Bound: American Families in the Cold War Era New York: Basic Books
  84. Mazey ME, Lee DR. 1983. Her Space, Her Place: A Geography of Women Washington, DC: Assoc. Am. Geogr.
  85. McDowell L, Sharp JP. 1997. Space, Gender, Knowledge: Feminist Readings London: Arnold
  86. Meadow T. 2010. “A rose is a rose”: on producing legal gender classifications. Gend. Soc. 24:6814–37 [Google Scholar]
  87. Meyerowitz JJ. 1988. Women Adrift: Independent Wage Earners in Chicago, 1880–1930 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  88. Miethe TD. 1995. Fear and withdrawal from urban life. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 539:14–27 [Google Scholar]
  89. Mjagkij N, Spratt M. 1997. Men and Women Adrift: The YMCA and the YWCA in the City New York: NYU Press
  90. Moore HL. 1986. Space, Text and Gender Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  91. Mueller C. 1994. Conflict networks and the origins of women's liberation. New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity H Johnson, E Larana, J Gusfield 234–63 Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  92. Myslik WD. 1996. Renegotiating the social/sexual identities of places: gay communities as safe havens or sites of resistance?. See Duncan 1996 156–69
  93. Namaste K. 1996. Genderbashing: sexuality, gender, and the regulation of public space. Environ. Plan. D: Soc. Space 14:221–40 [Google Scholar]
  94. Novak J, Sykora L. 2007. City in motion: time-space activity and mobility patterns of suburban inhabitants and the structuration of the spatial organization of the Prague metropolitan area. Geogr. Ann. 89B:147–67 [Google Scholar]
  95. Nusser SP, Anacker KA. 2013. What sexuality is this place? Building a framework for evaluating sexualized space: the case of Kansas City, Missouri. J. Urban Aff. 35:2173–93 [Google Scholar]
  96. Pain R. 2001. Gender, race, age, and fear in the city. Urban Stud. 38:899–913 [Google Scholar]
  97. Park R, Burgess EW. 1925 (1967). The City Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  98. Pascoe CJ. 2007. Dude, You're a Fag: Masculinity and Sexuality in High School Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  99. Perin C. 1977. Everything in Its Place: Social Order and Land Use in America Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  100. Podmore JA. 2001. Lesbians in the crowd: gender, sexuality, and visibility along Montreal's Boul. St-Laurent. Gend. Place Cult. 8:4333–55 [Google Scholar]
  101. Popenoe D. 1980. Women in the suburban environment: a U.S.-Sweden comparison. See Wekerle et al. 1980 165–74
  102. Quilley S. 1997. Constructing Manchester's ‘new urban village’: gay space in the entrepreneurial city. See Ingram et al. 1997 275–92
  103. Ridd R. 1981. Where women must dominate: response to oppression in a South African urban community. Women and Space: Ground Rules and Social Maps S Ardener 187–204 London: Croom Helm [Google Scholar]
  104. Riger S, Gordon MT, LeBailly R. 1978. Women's fear of crime. Victimology 3:274–84 [Google Scholar]
  105. Ritzdorf M. 2000. Sex, lies, and urban life: how municipal planning marginalizes African American women and their families. Gendering the City: Women, Boundaries, and Visions of Urban Life K Miranne, AH Young 169–82 New York: Rowman & Littlefield [Google Scholar]
  106. Rose D. 1984. Rethinking gentrification: beyond the uneven development of Marxist urban theory. Environ. Plan. D: Soc. Space 1:47–74 [Google Scholar]
  107. Rose G. 1993. Feminism and Geography: The Limits of Geographical Knowledge Minneapolis, MN: Univ. Minn. Press
  108. Rothenberg T. 1995. ‘And she told two friends’: lesbians creating urban social space. Mapping Desire: Geographies of Sexualities D Bell, G Valentine 150–65 London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  109. Rothman SM. 1978. Woman's Proper Place: A History of Changing Ideals and Practices, 1870 to the Present New York: Basic Books
  110. Ryan MP. 1990. Women in Public: Between Banners and Ballots, 1825–1880 Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
  111. Saegert S. 1980. Masculine cities and feminine suburbs: polarized ideas, contradictory realities. Signs 80:5S96–111 [Google Scholar]
  112. Sandercock L. 1998. Making the Invisible Visible: A Multicultural Planning History Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  113. Schafer A, Huebner BM, Bynum TS. 2006. Fear of crime and criminal victimization: gender-based contrasts. J. Crim. Justice 34:285–301 [Google Scholar]
  114. Schilt K. 2006. Just one of the guys? How transmen make gender visible at work. Gend. Soc. 20:4465–90 [Google Scholar]
  115. Schilt K, Westbrook L. 2009. Doing gender, doing heteronormativity: “gender normals,” transgender people, and the social maintenance of heterosexuality. Gend. Soc. 23:4440–64 [Google Scholar]
  116. Schrock D, Schwalbe M. 2009. Men, masculinities, and manhood acts. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 35:277–95 [Google Scholar]
  117. Schwartz B. 1976. Images of suburbia: some revisionist commentary and conclusions. The Changing Face of the Suburbs B Schwartz 325–40 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  118. Scott JC. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed New Haven: Yale Univ. Press
  119. Sewell JE. 2011. Women and the Everyday City: Public Space in San Francisco, 1890–1915 Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
  120. Shlay A, DiGregorio D. 1985. Same city, different worlds: examining gender- and work-based differences in perceptions of neighborhood desirability. Urban Aff. Q. 21:166–86 [Google Scholar]
  121. Simons W. 2001. Cities of Ladies: Beguine Communities in the Medieval Low Countries, 1200–1565 Philadelphia, PA: Univ. Pa. Press
  122. Soja EW. 1996. Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places Oxford, UK: Blackwell
  123. Soja EW. 2000. Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Regions Oxford: Blackwell
  124. Spain D. 1992. Gendered Spaces Chapel Hill: Univ. N.C. Press
  125. Spain D. 1995. Public housing and the beguinage. Gender in Urban Research JA Garber, RS Turner 256–70 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
  126. Spain D. 2000. Black women as city builders: redemptive places and the legacy of Nannie Helen Burroughs. Gendering the City: Women, Boundaries, and Visions of Urban Life KB Miranne, AH Young 105–18 New York: Rowman & Littlefield [Google Scholar]
  127. Spain D. 2001. How Women Saved the City Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
  128. Spain D. 2011. Women's rights and gendered spaces in 1970s Boston. Front.: J. Women Stud. 32:1152–78 [Google Scholar]
  129. Spain D. 2015. Constructive Feminism: Building Women's Rights into the City Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press. In press
  130. Spain D, Bianchi SM. 1996. Balancing Act: Motherhood, Marriage, and Employment Among American Women New York: Russell Sage Found.
  131. Spigel L. 1992. The suburban home companion: television and the neighborhood ideal in post-war America. See Colomina 1992 185–218 [Google Scholar]
  132. Stanko EA. 1995. Women, crime, and fear. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 539:46–58 [Google Scholar]
  133. Stansell C. 1986. City of Women: Sex and Class in New York, 1789–1860 Urbana: Univ. Ill. Press
  134. Stimpson CR, Dixler E, Nelson MJ, Yatrakis KB. 1981. Women and the American City Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  135. Swift E. 2011. The Big Roads: The Untold Story of the Engineers, Visionaries, and Trailblazers Who Created the American Superhighways Boston: Houghton Mifflin
  136. Terlinden U. 2003. City and Gender: International Discourse on Gender, Urbanism, and Architecture Opladen, Ger: Leske + Budrich
  137. Valentine G. 1989. The geography of women's fear. Area 21:385–90 [Google Scholar]
  138. Valentine G. 1996. (Re)negotiating the heterosexual street: lesbian productions of space. See Duncan 1996 146–55
  139. Valocchi S. 2005. Not yet queer enough: the lessons of queer theory for the sociology of gender and sexuality. Gend. Soc. 19:6750–70 [Google Scholar]
  140. Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas 416 U.S. 1 (1974)
  141. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. 272 U.S. 365 (1926)
  142. Walby S. 1989. Theorizing patriarchy. Sociology 23:2213–34 [Google Scholar]
  143. Weisman LK. 1992. Discrimination by Design: A Feminist Critique of the Man-Made Environment Urbana: Univ. Ill. Press
  144. Wekerle G, Peterson R, Morley D. 1980. New Space for Women Boulder, CO: Westview
  145. Werner K. 1980. Swedish women in single-family housing. See Wekerle et al. 1980 175–88
  146. West C, Zimmerman DH. 1987. Doing gender. Gend. Soc. 1:2125–51 [Google Scholar]
  147. West G. 1981. National Welfare Rights Movement: The Social Protest of Poor Women New York: Praeger
  148. Wilson E. 1991. The Sphinx in the City: Urban Life, the Control of Disorder, and Women Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  149. Zukin S. 1991. Landscapes of Power: From Detroit to Disney World Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error