1932

Abstract

In explaining the sources of cooperation and prosocial behavior, psychologists, behavioral economists, and biologists often focus on factors internal to the individual, such as altruistic motivations, other-regarding preferences, and prosocial emotions. By contrast, sociologists typically emphasize social forces external to the individual, including norms, reputation systems, and social networks. Here we review evidence for these rules, reputations, and relations, showing that they have powerful and pervasive effects on cooperation and prosocial behavior. Our discussion highlights two emergent themes of the reviewed literature. First, although these classes of sociological mechanisms typically promote cooperation, their presence can also create ambiguity for individuals regarding the reasons for their own and others' prosocial acts, and that ambiguity can undermine future prosociality in subsequent settings where the mechanisms are absent. Second, altruistic preferences and social mechanisms often interact, such that the causal significance of altruism is attenuated where these mechanisms are present.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112242
2015-08-14
2024-06-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/41/1/annurev-soc-073014-112242.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112242&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Almeling R. 2007. Selling genes, selling gender: egg agencies, sperm banks, and the medical market in genetic material. Am. Sociol. Rev. 72:319–40 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson C, Shirako A. 2008. Are individuals' reputations related to their history of behavior?. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 94:320–33 [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson C, Srivastava S, Beer JS, Spataro SE, Chatman JA. 2006. Knowing your place: self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 91:1091–110 [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson C, Willer R. 2014. Do status hierarchies benefit groups? A bounded functionalist account. The Psychology of Social Status JT Cheng, JL Tracy, C Anderson 44–70 New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  5. Anthony D, Smith SW, Williamson T. 2009. Reputation and reliability in collective goods: the case of the online encyclopedia Wikipedia. Ration. Soc. 21:283–306 [Google Scholar]
  6. Apicella CL, Marlowe FW, Fowler JH, Christakis NA. 2012. Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers. Nature 481:497–501 [Google Scholar]
  7. Axelrod RM. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation New York: Basic Books [Google Scholar]
  8. Baldassarri D. 2014. Cooperative networks: altruism, group solidarity, reciprocity, and sanctioning Work. Pap., Dep. Sociol., New York Univ. [Google Scholar]
  9. Baldassarri D, Grossman G. 2013. The effect of group attachment and social position on prosocial behavior: evidence from lab-in-the-field experiments. PLOS ONE 8:e58750 [Google Scholar]
  10. Balliet D. 2010. Communication and cooperation in social dilemmas: a meta-analytic review. J. Confl. Resolut. 54:39–57 [Google Scholar]
  11. Balliet D, Parks CD, Joireman J. 2009. Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: a meta-analysis. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 12:533–47 [Google Scholar]
  12. Barclay P. 2004. Trustworthiness and competitive altruism can also solve the “tragedy of the commons”. Evol. Hum. Behav. 25:209–20 [Google Scholar]
  13. Barclay P, Willer R. 2007. Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans. Proc. R. Soc. B 274:749–53 [Google Scholar]
  14. Batson CD. 2011. Altruism in Humans New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  15. Bearman P. 1997. Generalized exchange. Am. J. Sociol. 102:1383–415 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bem DJ. 1972. Self-perception theory. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 6:1–62 [Google Scholar]
  17. Benard S. 2012. Cohesion from conflict: Does intergroup conflict motivate intragroup norm enforcement and support for centralized leadership?. Soc. Psychol. Q. 75:107–30 [Google Scholar]
  18. Blau PM. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction [Google Scholar]
  19. Bowles S. 2008. Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine the moral sentiments: evidence from economic experiments. Science 320:1605–9 [Google Scholar]
  20. Brañas-Garza P, Cobo-Reyes R, Espinosa MP, Jiménez N, Kovářík J, Ponti G. 2010. Altruism and social integration. Games Econ. Behav. 69:249–57 [Google Scholar]
  21. Buskens V, Raub W. 2002. Embedded trust: control and learning. Adv. Group Process. 19:167–202 [Google Scholar]
  22. Centola D, Willer R, Macy M. 2005. The emperor's dilemma: a computational model of self-enforcing norms. Am. J. Sociol. 110:1009–40 [Google Scholar]
  23. Chong D. 1991. Collective Action and the Civil Rights Movement Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  24. Chwe MS-Y. 1999. Structure and strategy in collective action. Am. J. Sociol. 105:128–56 [Google Scholar]
  25. Cialdini RB, Reno RR, Kallgren CA. 1990. A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 58:1015–26 [Google Scholar]
  26. Coleman JS. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Sociol. 94:S95–S120 [Google Scholar]
  27. Dasgupta P. 1988. Trust as a commodity. Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations D Gambetta 49–72 Oxford: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  28. Diekmann A, Jann B, Przepiorka W, Wehrli S. 2014. Reputation formation and the evolution of cooperation in anonymous online markets. Am. Sociol. Rev. 79:65–85 [Google Scholar]
  29. DiMaggio P, Louch H. 1998. Socially embedded consumer transactions: For what kinds of purchases do people most often use networks?. Am. Sociol. Rev. 63:619–37 [Google Scholar]
  30. Durkheim E. 1982 (1895). Rules of the Sociological Method New York: Free Press [Google Scholar]
  31. Eckel CC, Fatas E, Wilson R. 2010. Cooperation and status in organizations. J. Public Econ. Theory 12:737–62 [Google Scholar]
  32. Eisenberg N, Guthrie IK, Cumberland A, Murphy BC, Shepard SA. et al. 2002. Prosocial development in early adulthood: a longitudinal study. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 82:993–1006 [Google Scholar]
  33. Ekeh PP. 1974. Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  34. Emler N. 1990. A social psychology of reputation. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 1:171–93 [Google Scholar]
  35. Engelmann JM, Over H, Herrmann E, Tomasello M. 2013. Young children care more about their reputation with ingroup members and potential reciprocators. Dev. Sci. 16:952–58 [Google Scholar]
  36. Eriksson K, Cownden D, Ehn M, Strimling P. 2014. ‘Altruistic’ and ‘antisocial’ punishers are one and the same. Rev. Behav. Econ. 1:209–21 [Google Scholar]
  37. Eriksson K, Strimling P. 2012. The hard problem of cooperation. PLOS ONE 7:e40325 [Google Scholar]
  38. Ermisch J, Gambetta D. 2010. Do strong family ties inhibit trust?. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 75:365–76 [Google Scholar]
  39. Falk A, Szech N. 2013. Morals and markets. Science 340:707–11 [Google Scholar]
  40. Fehr E, Gächter S. 2002. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415:137–40 [Google Scholar]
  41. Fehr E, Gintis H. 2007. Human motivation and social cooperation: experimental and analytical foundations. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 33:43–64 [Google Scholar]
  42. Feinberg M, Willer R, Schultz M. 2014. Gossip and ostracism promote cooperation in groups. Psychol. Sci. 25:656–64 [Google Scholar]
  43. Feinberg M, Willer R, Stellar J, Keltner D. 2012. The virtues of gossip: reputational information sharing as prosocial behavior. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 102:1015–30 [Google Scholar]
  44. Flynn FJ. 2003. How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Acad. Manag. J. 46:539–53 [Google Scholar]
  45. Fourcade M, Healy K. 2007. Moral views of market society. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 33:285–311 [Google Scholar]
  46. Fowler JH, Christakis NA. 2010. Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks. PNAS 107:5334–38 [Google Scholar]
  47. Frey BS, Oberholzer-Gee F. 1997. The cost of price incentives: an empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. Am. Econ. Rev. 87:746–55 [Google Scholar]
  48. Gambetta D, Przepiorka W. 2014. Natural and strategic generosity as signals of trustworthiness. PLOS ONE 9:e97533 [Google Scholar]
  49. Gheorghiu MA, Vignoles VL, Smith PB. 2009. Beyond the United States and Japan: testing Yamagishi's emancipation theory of trust across 31 nations. Soc. Psychol. Q. 72:365–83 [Google Scholar]
  50. Gintis H, Bowles S, Boyd R, Fehr E. 2003. Explaining altruistic behavior in humans. Evol. Hum. Behav. 24:153–72 [Google Scholar]
  51. Glanville JL, Andersson MA, Paxton P. 2013. Do social connections create trust? An examination using new longitudinal data. Soc. Forces 92:545–62 [Google Scholar]
  52. Gould RV. 1993. Collective action and network structure. Am. Sociol. Rev. 58:182–96 [Google Scholar]
  53. Granovetter M. 1978. Threshold models of collective behavior. Am. J. Sociol. 83:1420–43 [Google Scholar]
  54. Granovetter M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 91:481–510 [Google Scholar]
  55. Grossman G, Baldassarri D. 2012. The impact of elections on cooperation: evidence from a lab-in-the-field experiment in Uganda. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 56:964–85 [Google Scholar]
  56. Hardy CL, Van Vugt M. 2006. Nice guys finish first: the competitive altruism hypothesis. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 32:1402–13 [Google Scholar]
  57. Healy K. 2000. Embedded altruism: blood collection regimes and the European Union's donor population. Am. J. Sociol. 105:1633–57 [Google Scholar]
  58. Hechter M. 1988. Principles of Group Solidarity Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  59. Heckathorn DD. 1996. The dynamics and dilemmas of collective action. Am. Sociol. Rev. 61:250–77 [Google Scholar]
  60. Herrmann B, Thöni C, Gächter S. 2008. Antisocial punishment across societies. Science 319:1362–67 [Google Scholar]
  61. Hitlin S, Vaisey S. 2013. The new sociology of morality. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 39:51–68 [Google Scholar]
  62. Homans GC. 1974. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. Oxford, UK: Harcourt Brace [Google Scholar]
  63. Horne C. 2009. The Rewards of Punishment: A Relational Theory of Norm Enforcement Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  64. Irwin K, Horne C. 2013. A normative explanation of antisocial punishment. Soc. Sci. Res. 42:562–70 [Google Scholar]
  65. Jasper JM. 2011. Emotions and social movements: twenty years of theory and research. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 37:285–303 [Google Scholar]
  66. Johnson C, Dowd TJ, Ridgeway CL. 2006. Legitimacy as a social process. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 32:53–78 [Google Scholar]
  67. Jordan JJ, Rand DG, Arbesman S, Fowler JH, Christakis NA. 2013. Contagion of cooperation in static and fluid social networks. PLOS ONE 8:e66199 [Google Scholar]
  68. Keizer K, Lindenberg S, Steg L. 2008. The spreading of disorder. Science 322:1681–85 [Google Scholar]
  69. Kim H, Bearman PS. 1997. The structure and dynamics of movement participation. Am. Sociol. Rev. 62:70–93 [Google Scholar]
  70. Kitts JA. 2000. Mobilizing in black boxes: social networks and participation in social movement organizations. Mobil. Int. Q. 5:241–57 [Google Scholar]
  71. Kitts JA. 2006. Collective action, rival incentives, and the emergence of antisocial norms. Am. Sociol. Rev. 71:235–59 [Google Scholar]
  72. Kollock P. 1994. The emergence of exchange structures: an experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust. Am. J. Sociol. 100:313–45 [Google Scholar]
  73. Kollock P. 1998. Social dilemmas: the anatomy of cooperation. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 24:183–214 [Google Scholar]
  74. Kuwabara K. 2015. Do reputation systems undermine trust? Divergent effects of reputational, contractual, and relational enforcement on generalized trust and trustworthiness Work. Pap., Columbia Univ. [Google Scholar]
  75. Lacetera N, Macis M. 2010. Social image concerns and prosocial behavior: field evidence from a nonlinear incentive scheme. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 76:225–37 [Google Scholar]
  76. Lawler EJ, Thye SR, Yoon J. 2008. Social exchange and micro social order. Am. Sociol. Rev. 73:519–42 [Google Scholar]
  77. Leider S, Möbius MM, Rosenblat T, Do Q-A. 2009. Directed altruism and enforced reciprocity in social networks. Q. J. Econ. 124:1815–51 [Google Scholar]
  78. Macy MW. 1991. Chains of cooperation: threshold effects in collective action. Am. Sociol. Rev. 56:730–47 [Google Scholar]
  79. Macy MW, Skvoretz J. 1998. The evolution of trust and cooperation between strangers: a computational model. Am. Sociol. Rev. 63:638–60 [Google Scholar]
  80. Magee JC, Galinsky AD. 2008. Social hierarchy: the self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2:351–98 [Google Scholar]
  81. Malhotra D, Murnighan JK. 2002. The effects of contracts on interpersonal trust. Adm. Sci. Q. 47:534–59 [Google Scholar]
  82. Marwell G, Oliver PE, Prahl R. 1988. Social networks and collective action: a theory of the critical mass. III. Am. J. Sociol. 94:502–34 [Google Scholar]
  83. Mauss M. 1922. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies New York: Norton [Google Scholar]
  84. McAdam D. 1986. Recruitment to high-risk activism: the case of Freedom Summer. Am. J. Sociol. 92:64–90 [Google Scholar]
  85. Mellström C, Johannesson M. 2008. Crowding out in blood donation: Was Titmuss right?. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 6:845–63 [Google Scholar]
  86. Milinski M, Semmann D, Krambeck H-J. 2002. Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’. Nature 415:424–26 [Google Scholar]
  87. Miller DT. 1999. The norm of self-interest. Am. Psychol. 54:105–60 [Google Scholar]
  88. Molm LD, Collett JL, Schaefer DR. 2007. Building solidarity through generalized exchange: a theory of reciprocity. Am. J. Sociol. 113:205–42 [Google Scholar]
  89. Mulder LB, Van Dijk E, De Cremer D, Wilke HAM. 2006. Undermining trust and cooperation: the paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 42:147–62 [Google Scholar]
  90. Nikiforakis N. 2008. Punishment and counter-punishment in public good games: Can we really govern ourselves?. J. Public Econ. 92:91–112 [Google Scholar]
  91. O'Gorman R, Henrich J, Van Vugt M. 2009. Constraining free riding in public goods games: Designated solitary punishers can sustain human cooperation. Proc. R. Soc. B 276:323–29 [Google Scholar]
  92. Oliver P. 1980. Rewards and punishments as selective incentives for collective action: theoretical investigations. Am. J. Sociol. 85:1356–75 [Google Scholar]
  93. Oliver PE. 1993. Formal models of collective action. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 19:271–300 [Google Scholar]
  94. Orbell JM, Dawes RM. 1993. Social welfare, cooperators' advantage, and the option of not playing the game. Am. Sociol. Rev. 58:787–800 [Google Scholar]
  95. Ostrom E. 1998. A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: Presidential address, American Political Science Association, 1997. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 92:1–22 [Google Scholar]
  96. Ostrom E. 2000. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J. Econ. Perspect. 14:137–58 [Google Scholar]
  97. Ostrom E, Walker J, Gardner R. 1992. Covenants with and without a sword: Self-governance is possible. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 86:404–17 [Google Scholar]
  98. Parks CD, Rumble AC. 2001. Elements of reciprocity and social value orientation. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 27:1301–9 [Google Scholar]
  99. Parks CD, Stone AB. 2010. The desire to expel unselfish members from the group. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 99:303–10 [Google Scholar]
  100. Passy F, Monsch G-A. 2014. Do social networks really matter in contentious politics?. Soc. Mov. Stud. 13:22–47 [Google Scholar]
  101. Paxton P, Moody J. 2003. Structure and sentiment: explaining emotional attachment to group. Soc. Psychol. Q. 66:34–47 [Google Scholar]
  102. Pfaff S. 1996. Collective identity and informal groups in revolutionary mobilization: East Germany in 1989. Soc. Forces 75:91–117 [Google Scholar]
  103. Prentice DA, Miller DT. 1993. Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 64:243–56 [Google Scholar]
  104. Przepiorka W, Diekmann A. 2013. Individual heterogeneity and costly punishment: a volunteer's dilemma. Proc. R. Soc. B 280:20130247 [Google Scholar]
  105. Rand DG, Arbesman S, Christakis NA. 2011. Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans. PNAS 108:19193–98 [Google Scholar]
  106. Rand DG, Nowak MA. 2013. Human cooperation. Trends Cognit. Sci. 17:413–25 [Google Scholar]
  107. Resnick P, Zeckhauser R. 2002. Trust among strangers in Internet transactions: empirical analysis of eBay's reputation system. Adv. Appl. Microecon. 11:127–57 [Google Scholar]
  108. Restivo M, Van De Rijt A. 2012. Experimental study of informal rewards in peer production. PLOS ONE 7:e34358 [Google Scholar]
  109. Sally D. 1995. Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas: a meta-analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992. Ration. Soc. 7:58–92 [Google Scholar]
  110. Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V. 2007. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol. Sci. 18:429–34 [Google Scholar]
  111. Sell J. 1997. Gender, strategies, and contributions to public goods. Soc. Psychol. Q. 60:252–65 [Google Scholar]
  112. Sell J, Wilson RK. 1991. Levels of information and contributions to public goods. Soc. Forces 70:107–24 [Google Scholar]
  113. Shinada M, Yamagishi T. 2008. Bringing back Leviathan into social dilemmas. New Issues and Paradigms in Research on Social Dilemmas A Biel, D Eek, T Gärling, M Gustafson 93–123 New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  114. Simpson B, Brashears M, Gladstone E, Harrell A. 2014. Birds of different feathers cooperate together: no evidence for altruism homophily in networks. Sociol. Sci. 1:542–64 [Google Scholar]
  115. Simpson B, Eriksson K. 2009. The dynamics of contracts and generalized trustworthiness. Ration. Soc. 21:59–80 [Google Scholar]
  116. Simpson B, Willer R. 2008. Altruism and indirect reciprocity: the interaction of person and situation in prosocial behavior. Soc. Psychol. Q. 71:37–52 [Google Scholar]
  117. Simpson B, Willer R, Ridgeway CL. 2012. Status hierarchies and the organization of collective action. Sociol. Theory 30:149–66 [Google Scholar]
  118. Smith EA, Bird RLB. 2000. Turtle hunting and tombstone opening: public generosity as costly signaling. Evol. Hum. Behav. 21:245–61 [Google Scholar]
  119. Smith MA, Kollock P. 1999. Communities in Cyberspace New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  120. Sober E, Wilson DS. 1999. Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  121. Sutter M, Haigner S, Kocher MG. 2010. Choosing the carrot or the stick? Endogenous institutional choice in social dilemma situations. Rev. Econ. Stud. 77:1540–66 [Google Scholar]
  122. Takahashi N. 2000. The emergence of generalized exchange. Am. J. Sociol. 105:1105–34 [Google Scholar]
  123. Thye SR. 2000. A status value theory of power in exchange relations. Am. Sociol. Rev. 65:407–32 [Google Scholar]
  124. Titmuss RM. 1970. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy New York: New Press [Google Scholar]
  125. Tsvetkova M, Macy MW. 2014. The social contagion of generosity. PLOS ONE 9:e87275 [Google Scholar]
  126. Udéhn L. 1993. Twenty-five years with the logic of collective action. Acta Sociol. 36:239–61 [Google Scholar]
  127. Uehara E. 1990. Dual exchange theory, social networks, and informal social support. Am. J. Sociol. 96:521–57 [Google Scholar]
  128. Van Lange PAM, Balliet DP, Parks CD, van Vugt M. 2014. Social Dilemmas: The Psychology of Human Cooperation Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  129. Van Lange PAM, Klapwijk A, Van Munster LM. 2011. How the shadow of the future might promote cooperation. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 14:857–70 [Google Scholar]
  130. Van Vugt M, De Cremer D. 1999. Leadership in social dilemmas: the effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 76:587–99 [Google Scholar]
  131. Varese F, Yaish M. 2000. The importance of being asked: the rescue of Jews in Nazi Europe. Ration. Soc. 12:307–34 [Google Scholar]
  132. Welch MR, Sikkink D, Loveland MT. 2007. The radius of trust: religion, social embeddedness and trust in strangers. Soc. Forces 86:23–46 [Google Scholar]
  133. Willer R. 2009. Groups reward individual sacrifice: the status solution to the collective action problem. Am. Sociol. Rev. 74:23–43 [Google Scholar]
  134. Willer R, Feinberg MW, Flynn FJ, Simpson B. 2014a. The duality of generosity: Altruism and status seeking motivate prosocial behavior Work. Pap., Dep. Sociol., Stanford Univ. [Google Scholar]
  135. Willer R, Flynn FJ, Feinberg MW, Mensching O, de Mello Ferreira VR. et al. 2014b. Do people pay it forward? Gratitude fosters generalized reciprocity Work. Pap., Dep. Sociol., Stanford Univ. [Google Scholar]
  136. Willer R, Flynn FJ, Zak S. 2012. Structure, identity, and solidarity: a comparative field study of generalized and direct exchange. Adm. Sci. Q. 57:119–55 [Google Scholar]
  137. Willer R, Kuwabara K, Macy MW. 2009. The false enforcement of unpopular norms. Am. J. Sociol. 115:451–90 [Google Scholar]
  138. Wilson TD. 2009. Strangers to Ourselves Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  139. Wrong DH. 1961. The oversocialized conception of man in modern sociology. Am. Sociol. Rev. 26:183–93 [Google Scholar]
  140. Yamagishi T. 1986. The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 51:110–16 [Google Scholar]
  141. Yamagishi T. 1988. The provision of a sanctioning system in the United States and Japan. Soc. Psychol. Q. 51:265–71 [Google Scholar]
  142. Yamagishi T, Cook KS. 1993. Generalized exchange and social dilemmas. Soc. Psychol. Q. 56:235–48 [Google Scholar]
  143. Yamagishi T, Hayashi N. 1996. Selective play: social embeddedness of social dilemmas. Frontiers in Social Dilemmas Research WBG Liebrand, DM Messick 363–84 New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  144. Yamagishi T, Matsuda M, Yoshikai N, Takahashi H, Usui Y. 2009. Solving the lemons problem with reputation. eTrust: Forming Relationships in the Online World KS Cook, C Snijders, V Buskens, C Cheshire 73–109 New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  145. Yamagishi T, Yamagishi M. 1994. Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motiv. Emotion 18:129–66 [Google Scholar]
  146. Yoeli E, Hoffman M, Rand DG, Nowak MA. 2013. Powering up with indirect reciprocity in a large-scale field experiment. PNAS 110:10424–29 [Google Scholar]
  147. Zelizer V. 1983. Morals and Markets: The Development of Life Insurance in the United States. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112242
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error