1932

Abstract

Charter schools have been on the educational reform landscape for over twenty years. In the last ten years, a number of rigorous studies have examined the effects of these schools on student achievement and educational attainment. Findings reveal mixed results where student achievement is concerned (i.e., some positive, some negative, some neutral) and positive results in terms of educational attainment (i.e., high school graduation and college attendance). The article places this research within a framework that draws on both market and institutional theories, and concludes that additional research on the social organization of charter schools and traditional public schools is needed to better understand the conditions under which school choice is or is not effective.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112340
2015-08-14
2024-04-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/41/1/annurev-soc-073014-112340.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112340&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abdulkadiroglu A, Angrist JD, Cohodes SR, Dynarski SM, Fullerton JB. et al. 2009. Informing the Debate: Comparing Boston's Charter, Pilot and Traditional Schools Boston: Boston Found.
  2. Abdulkadiroglu A, Angrist JD, Dynarski SM, Kane TJ, Pathak PA. 2011. Accountability and flexibility in public schools: evidence from Boston's charters and pilots. Q. J. Econ. 126:699–748 [Google Scholar]
  3. Angrist JD, Cohodes SR, Dynarski SM, Fullerton JB, Kane TJ. et al. 2011. Student Achievement in Massachusetts' Charter Schools Boston: Cent. Educ. Policy Res. Harvard Univ.
  4. Angrist JD, Cohodes SR, Dynarski SM, Pathak PA, Walters CD. 2013. Charter schools and the road to college readiness: the effects on college preparation, attendance and choice Report prepared for the Boston Foundation and NewSchools Venture Fund
  5. Berends M, Bodilly S, Kirby S. 2002. Facing the Challenges of Whole-School Reform: New American Schools After a Decade Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp.
  6. Berends M, Cannata M, Goldring EB. 2011. School Choice and School Improvement Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educ. Press
  7. Berends M, Goldring EB, Stein M, Cravens X. 2010. Instructional conditions in charter schools and students' mathematics achievement gains. Am. J. Educ. 116:3303–35 [Google Scholar]
  8. Berends M, Springer MG, Ballou D, Walberg HJ. 2009. Handbook of Research on School Choice New York: Routledge
  9. Berends M, Springer MG, Walberg HJ. 2008a. Charter School Outcomes New York: Taylor & Francis
  10. Berends M, Watral C, Teasley B, Nicotera A. 2008b. Charter school effects on achievement: where we are and where we're going. See Berends et al. 2008a 243–67
  11. Berends M, Zottola GC. 2009. Social perspectives on school choice. See Berends et al. 2009 35–53
  12. Betts JR. 2005. The economic theory of school choice. See Betts & Loveless 2005 14–39
  13. Betts JR, Hill PT. 2010. Taking Measure of Charter Schools: Better Assessments, Better Policymaking, Better Schools. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
  14. Betts JR, Loveless T. 2005. Getting Choice Right: Ensuring Equity and Efficiency in Education Policy Washington, DC: Brookings Inst.
  15. Betts JR, Tang YE. 2014. A meta-analysis of the literature on the effect of charter schools on student achievement Natl. Charter School Res. Proj., Cent. Reinventing Public Educ., Bothell, Univ. Wash.
  16. Bidwell CE. 1972. Schooling and socialization for moral commitment. Interchange 3:1–27 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bidwell CE, Dreeben R. 2006. Public and private education: conceptualizing the distinction. School Sector and Student Outcomes MT Hallinan 9–37 Notre Dame, IN: Univ. Notre Dame Press [Google Scholar]
  18. Bidwell CE, Friedkin NE. 1988. The sociology of education. The Handbook of Sociology NJ Smelser 449–71 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
  19. Bidwell CE, Kasarda JD. 1980. Conceptualizing and measuring the effects of school and schooling. Am. J. Educ. 88:401–30 [Google Scholar]
  20. Bifulco R, Ladd HF. 2006. The impacts of charter schools on student achievement: evidence from North Carolina. Educ. Financ. Policy 1:150–90 [Google Scholar]
  21. Booker K, Gill B, Sass T, Zimmer R. 2014. Charter high schools' effects on long-term attainment and earnings Work. Pap. Mathematica Policy Research
  22. Booker K, Sass T, Gill B, Zimmer R. 2011. The effects of charter high schools on educational attainment. J. Lab. Econ. 29:377–415 [Google Scholar]
  23. Booker TK, Gilpatric SM, Gronberg TJ, Jansen DW. 2007. The impact of charter school student attendance on student performance. J. Public Econ. 91:849–76 [Google Scholar]
  24. Bryk AS, Sebring PB, Allensworth E, Luppescu S, Easton JQ. 2010. Organizing Schools for Improvement: Lessons from Chicago Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  25. Cannata M, Engel M. 2012. Does charter status determine preferences? Comparing the hiring preferences of charter and traditional public school principals. Educ. Financ. Policy 7:4455–88 [Google Scholar]
  26. Cannata M, Peñaloza RV. 2012. Who are charter school teachers? Comparing teacher characteristics, job choices, and job preferences. Educ. Policy Anal. Arch. 20:291–21 [Google Scholar]
  27. Center for Education Reform 2008. America's Attitudes Toward Charter Schools. Washington, DC: Cent. Educ. Reform https://www.edreform.com/2012/01/americas-attitudes-toward-charter-schools-2008/
  28. Chubb JE, Moe TM. 1990. Politics, Markets and American Schools Washington, DC: Brookings Inst.
  29. Clark MA, Gleason PM, Tuttle CC, Silverger MK. 2015. Do charter schools improve student achievement?. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. In press
  30. Cohen DK, Peurach DJ, Glazer JL, Gates KE, Goldin S. 2014. Improvement by Design: The Promise of Better Schools Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  31. Coleman JS, Campbell E, Hobson C, McPartland J, Mood A. et al. 1966. Equality of Educational Opportunity Washington, DC: US Government Print. Off.
  32. Corcoran SP, Stoddard C. 2011. Local demand for school choice: evidence from the Washington Charter School Referenda. Educ. Financ. Policy 6:3323–53 [Google Scholar]
  33. Cravens XC, Goldring EB, Peñaloza RV. 2012. Leadership practice in the context of school choice in the United States. Leadersh. Policy Sch. 11:452–76 [Google Scholar]
  34. CREDO (Cent. Res. Educ. Outcomes) 2013. National Charter School Study Stanford, CA: CREDO https://credo.stanford.edu/documents/NCSS%202013%20Final%20Draft.pdf
  35. Cucchiara MB. 2013. Marking Schools, Marketing Cities: Who Wins and Who Loses When Schools Become Urban Amenities? Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  36. Davis DH, Raymond ME. 2012. Choice for studying choice: assessing charter school effectiveness using two quasi-experimental methods. Econ. Educ. Rev. 31:2225–36 [Google Scholar]
  37. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Soc. Rev. 48:147–60 [Google Scholar]
  38. Dobbie W, Fryer RG. 2011. Are high-quality schools enough to increase achievement among the poor? Evidence from the Harlem Children's Zone. Am. Econ J. 3:3158–87 [Google Scholar]
  39. Dobbie W, Fryer RG. 2013. Getting beneath the veil of effective schools: evidence from New York City. Am. Econ. J. 5428–60 [Google Scholar]
  40. Dreeben R. 1994. The sociology of education: its development in the United States. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization A Pallas 107–52 Greenwich, CT: JAI Press [Google Scholar]
  41. Dreeben R, Barr R. 1987. An organizational analysis of curriculum and instruction. The Social Organization of Schools: New Conceptualizing of the Learning Process MT Hallinan 13–39 New York: Plenum [Google Scholar]
  42. Dynarski S, Berends M. 2015. Introduction to Special Issue. Research using longitudinal student data systems: findings, lessons, and prospects. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 37:1S1S–5S [Google Scholar]
  43. Education Week 2013. Obama's Second Term: What's Ahead for Education Policy Bethesda, MD: Editorial Projects in Education
  44. Elmore R. 2007. School Reform from the Inside Out: Policy, Practice, and Performance Boston: Harvard Educ. Press
  45. Finnegan KS. 2007. Charter school autonomy: the mismatch between theory and practice. Educ. Policy 21:3503–26 [Google Scholar]
  46. Friedman M. 1955. The role of government in education. Economics and the Public Interest RA Solo 123–44 New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  47. Friedman M. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press
  48. Furgeson J, Gill B, Haimson J, Killewald A, McCullough M. et al. 2012. Charter-School Management Organizations: Diverse Strategies and Diverse Student Impacts Cambridge, MA: Mathematica Policy Res./Cent. Reinventing Public Educ.
  49. Gamoran A, Nystrand M, Berends M, LePore P. 1995. An organizational analysis of the effects of ability grouping. Am. Educ. Res. J. 24:687–715 [Google Scholar]
  50. Gamoran A, Secada WG, Marrett CB. 2000. The organizational context of teaching and learning. Handbook of the Sociology of Education MT Hallinan 37–63 New York: Kluwer Academic [Google Scholar]
  51. Gill BP, Timpane PM, Ross KE, Brewer DJ. 2007. Rhetoric Versus Reality: What We Know and What We Need to Know about Vouchers and Charter Schools Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp.
  52. Gleason PM. 2014. What's the secret ingredient? Searching for policies and practices that make charter schools successful Presented at Crossroads of America: The Intersection of Research and Policy in the Indiana School Choice Ecosystem, June 9–10, Univ. Notre Dame, Cent. Res. Educ. Oppor.
  53. Gleason PM, Clark MA, Tuttle CC, Dwoyer E. 2010. The Evaluation of Charter School Impacts Washington, DC: US Dep. Educ.
  54. Gleason PM, Tuttle CC, Gill B, Nichols-Barrer I, Bing-ru T. 2014. Do KIPP schools boost student achievement?. Educ. Financ. Policy 9:136–58 [Google Scholar]
  55. Goff PT, Mavrogordato M, Goldring EB. 2012. Instructional leadership in charter schools: Is there an organizational effect or are leadership practices the result of faculty characteristics and preferences?. Leadersh. Policy Sch. 11:11–25 [Google Scholar]
  56. Goldring E, Berends M. 2009. Leading with Data: Pathways to Improve Your School Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin
  57. Hamilton LS, Stecher BM. 2010. Expanding what counts when evaluating charter school effectiveness. Taking Measure of Charter Schools: Better Assessment, Better Policymaking, Better Schools JR Betts, PT Hill 33–54 Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield [Google Scholar]
  58. Hanushek EA, Kain JF, Rivkin SG, Branch GF. 2007. Charter school quality and parental decision making with school choice. J. Public Econ. 91:823–48 [Google Scholar]
  59. Henig JR. 1995. Rethinking School Choice: Limits of the Market Metaphor Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  60. Hess FM. 2002. Revolution at the Margins: The Impact of Competition on Urban School Systems Washington, DC: Brookings Inst.
  61. Hoxby CM, Murarka S. 2008. Methods of assessing achievement of students in charter schools. See Berends et al. 2008a 7–37
  62. Hoxby CM, Murarka S, Kang J. 2009. How New York City's Charter Schools Affect Achievement Cambridge, MA: New York City Charter Sch. Eval. Proj.
  63. Imberman S. 2011. Achievement and behavior in charter schools: drawing a more complete picture. Rev. Econ. Stat. 93:2416–35 [Google Scholar]
  64. Jennings JL. 2010. School choice or schools' choice? Managing in an era of accountability. Sociol. Educ. 83:227–47 [Google Scholar]
  65. Junge ER. 2012. Zero Chance of Passage: The Pioneering Charter School History Edina, MN: Beaver's Pond
  66. Konstantopoulos S. 2006. Trends of school effects on student achievement: evidence from NLS:72, HSB:82, and NELS:92. Teach. College Rec. 108:2550–81 [Google Scholar]
  67. Ladd HF, Fiske EB, Ruijs N. 2011. Does parental choice foster segregated schools? Insights from the Netherlands. School Choice and School Improvement M Berends, M Cannata, EB Goldring 233–53 Boston, MA: Harvard Educ. Press [Google Scholar]
  68. Lareau A, Goyette K. 2014. Choosing Homes, Choosing Schools New York: Russell Sage
  69. Levin HM. 1998. Educational vouchers: effectiveness, choice, and costs. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 17:3392–91 [Google Scholar]
  70. Lubienski C. 2003. Innovation in education markets: theory and evidence on the impact of competition and choice in charter schools. Am. Educ. Res. J. 40:2395–443 [Google Scholar]
  71. Mehana M, Reynolds AJ. 2004. School mobility and achievement: a meta-analysis. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 26:193–119 [Google Scholar]
  72. Meyer JW. 1977. The effects of education as an institution. Am. J. Sociol. 83:155–77 [Google Scholar]
  73. Meyer JW, Ramirez F. 2000. The world institutionalization of education. Discourse Formation in Comparative Education J Schriewer 111–32 Frankfurt, Ger: Peter Lang [Google Scholar]
  74. Meyer JW, Rowan B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am. J. Sociol. 83:340–63 [Google Scholar]
  75. Meyer JW, Rowan B. 1978. The structure of educational organizations. Environments and Organizations MW Meyer 78–109 San Francisco: Jossey-Bass [Google Scholar]
  76. Miron G, Urschel JL, Aguilar MAY, Dailey B. 2012. Profiles of for-profit and non-profit education management organizations Natl. Educ. Policy Cent. Rep. 13-288, Boulder, CO
  77. National Alliance for Public Charter Schools 2014. Overview of public charter schools Accessed on August 12, 2014. http://www.publiccharters.org/dashboard/schools/year/2013
  78. Newmann FM, Smith B, Allensworth E, Bryk AS. 2001. Instructional program coherence: what it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 234:297–321 [Google Scholar]
  79. Oakes J, Gamoran A, Page RN. 1992. Curriculum differentiation: opportunities, outcomes, and meanings. Handbook of Research on Curriculum PW Jackson 570–608 New York: Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  80. Obama B. 2008. 2008. Politico pre-Potomac primary interviews: on education. February 11. http://www.ontheissues.org/Archive/2008_Politico_Education.htm
  81. Parsons T. 1959. The school class as a social system: some of its functions in American society. Harvard Educ. Rev. 29:297–318 [Google Scholar]
  82. Patillo M, O'Connor LD, Butts F. 2014. High stakes choosing. See Lareau & Goyette 2014 237–67
  83. Peurach DJ. 2011. Seeing Complexity in Public Education: Problems, Possibilities, and Success for All New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  84. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  85. Preston C, Goldring E, Berends M, Cannata M. 2012. School innovation in district context: comparing traditional public schools and charter schools. Econ. Educ. Rev. 31:2318–30 [Google Scholar]
  86. Ravitch D. 2010. The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education New York: Basic Books
  87. Ravitch D. 2013. Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America's Public Schools New York: Knopf
  88. Renzulli L, Barr A, Paino M. 2014. Innovative education? A test of the specialist mimicry or generalist assimilation in trends in charter school specialization over time. Sociol. Educ. 88:183–102 [Google Scholar]
  89. Renzulli LA, Roscigno V. 2005. Charter school policy, implementation, and diffusion in the United States. Sociol. Educ. 78:344–65 [Google Scholar]
  90. Roda A, Wells AS. 2013. School choice policies and racial segregation: where white parents' good intentions, anxiety, and privilege collide. Am. J. Educ. 119:2261–93 [Google Scholar]
  91. Rowan B, Correnti R, Miller RJ. 2002. What large-scale survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: insights from the Prospects study of elementary schools. Teachers College Rec. 104:81525–67 [Google Scholar]
  92. Sass TR. 2006. Charter schools and student achievement in Florida. Educ. Financ. Policy 1:191–122 [Google Scholar]
  93. Sattin-Bajaj C. 2014. Unaccompanied Minors: Immigrant Youth, School Choice, and the Pursuit of Equity Boston, MA: Harvard Educ. Press
  94. Scheerens J, Bosker R. 1997. The Foundations of Educational Effectiveness New York: Pergamon
  95. Schneider B. 2003. Sociology of education: an overview of the field at the turn of the twenty-first century. Stability and Change in American Education: Structure, Process, and Outcomes M Hallinan, A Gamoran, W Kubitsheck, T Loveless 193–226 Clinton Corners, NY: Eliot Werner [Google Scholar]
  96. Scott WR, Davis GF. 2007. Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open System Perspectives Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
  97. Scott WR, Meyer JW. 1994. Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
  98. South SJ, Haynie DL, Bose S. 2007. Student mobility and school dropout. Soc. Sci. Res. 36:168–94 [Google Scholar]
  99. Stoddard C, Corcoran SP. 2007. The political economy of school choice: support for charter schools across states and school districts. J. Urban Econ. 52:127–54 [Google Scholar]
  100. Teasley B. 2009. Charter school outcomes. See Berends et al. 2009 209–25
  101. Tuttle CC, Bing-ru T, Nichols-Barrer I, Gill BP, Gleason P. 2010. Student characteristics and achievement in 22 KIPP middle schools Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Res.
  102. US Department of Education 2004. Successful charter schools Off. Innov. Improv. Rep., US Dep. Educ., Washington, DC. http://www.p12.nysed.gov/psc/documents/USDOESuccessfulCharterSchoolsreport.pdf
  103. US Department of Education 2008. A commitment to quality: national charter school policy forum report Off. Innov. Improv. Rep., US Dep. Educ., Washington, DC. http://www.isbe.net/charter/pdf/National_Charter_School_Policy_Forum_Report2008.pdf
  104. Walberg HJ. 2011. Tests, Testing, and Genuine School Reform Stanford, CA: Hoover Inst.
  105. Walberg HJ, Bast J. 2003. Education and Capitalism: How Overcoming Our Fear of Markets and Economics Can Improve America's Schools Stanford, CA: Hoover Inst.
  106. Waller WW. 1932. The Sociology of Teaching New York: Wiley
  107. Wells AS. 1993. Time to Choose: America at the Crossroads of School Choice Policy New York: Hill & Wang
  108. Wohlstetter P, Smith J, Farell CC. 2013. Choices and Challenges: Charter School Performance in Perspective Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educ. Press
  109. Wolf PJ, Kisida B, Gutmann B, Puma J, Eissa N, Rizzo L. 2013. School vouchers and student outcomes: experimental evidence from Washington, DC. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 32:2246–70 [Google Scholar]
  110. Wong KK, Klopott S. 2009. Politics and governance in charter schools. See Berends et al. 2009 115–35
  111. Wong KK, Shen FX. 2008. Charter law and charter operation: re-examining the charter school marketplace. See Berends et al. 2008a 131–61
  112. Zimmer R, Buddin R. 2006. Charter school performance in urban districts. J. Urban Econ. 60:2307–26 [Google Scholar]
  113. Zimmer R, Buddin R. 2007. Getting inside the black box: examining how the operation of charter schools affect performance. Peabody J. Educ. 82:2–3231–73 [Google Scholar]
  114. Zimmer R, Buddin R. 2008. Charter schools in California. See Berends et al. 2008a 163–94
  115. Zimmer R, Buddin R, Chau D, Daley G, Gill B. et al. 2003. Charter School Operations and Performance: Evidence from California Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp.
  116. Zimmer R, Gill R, Booker K, Lavertu S, Sass TR, Witte J. 2009. Charter Schools in Eight States: Effects on Achievement, Attainment, Integration, and Competition Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp.
  117. Zimmer R, Gill R, Booker K, Lavertu S, Sass TR, Witte J. 2012. Examining charter school achievement effects across seven states. Econ. Educ. Rev. 31:2213–24 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112340
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112340
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error