1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics
  4. Volume 1, 2000
  5. Article

Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics

Volume 1, 2000

Public Concern About Genetics

Abstract

Throughout the twentieth century and continuing into the present, the general public has been fascinated by advances in genetic knowledge. At times, individuals and groups have either inadvertently or deliberately misused genetic knowledge in the service of political goals. At other times, advances in genetics have challenged deeply held societal or religious beliefs. During the 1990s, there were many advances that focused an unprecedented level of public attention and concern on genetics. In particular, the public has expressed deep concern about gene mapping, cloning, and genetically modified foods. In each case, the origin of the concern and the nature of the public response have been different. I consider these topics and argue that the scientific community must increase its commitment to public discourse.

Keyword(s): cloning, genetic discrimination, genetically modified foods, history of genetics
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.genom.1.1.485
2000-09-01
2025-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/genom/1/1/annurev.genom.1.1.485.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.genom.1.1.485&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Advertisement 1999. Who plays God in the twenty-first century?. New York Times October 11 A11 [Google Scholar]
  2. Advertisement 1999. You'll run for president, but not to class. MXG November
  3. American Society of Human Genetics, Board of Directors 1999. Eugenics and the misuse of genetic information to restrict reproductive freedom.. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 64:335–38 [Google Scholar]
  4. Americans with Disabilities Act 1990. 104 Stat. 328, 42 U.S. Code § 12101 et seq
  5. Annas GJ, Glantz LH, Roche PA. 1995. The Genetic Privacy Act and Commentary. Boston: Boston Univ. Sch. Public Health 165 pp. [Google Scholar]
  6. Associated Press 1999. Gerber drops gene-altered food supplies.. Boston Globe July 31 A4 [Google Scholar]
  7. Associated Press 1999. Interracial marriage ban up for vote in Alabama.. New York Times, June 3 A17 [Google Scholar]
  8. Barboza D. 1999. Biotech companies take on critics of gene-altered food.. New York Times, Nov. 12 Ap.1 [Google Scholar]
  9. Beardsley T. 1996. Vital data.. Sci. Am. XX:100–5 [Google Scholar]
  10. Billings PR, Kohn MA, de Cuevas M, Beckwith J, Alper JS. et al. 1992. Discrimination as a consequence of genetic testing.. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 50:476–83 [Google Scholar]
  11. Deleted in proof
  12. Brunner HG. 1993. X-linked borderline mental retardation with prominent behavioral disturbance:phenotype, genetic localization, and evidence for disturbed monoamine metabolism.. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 52:1032–39 [Google Scholar]
  13. Clinton W. 1997. Science in the 21st century.. Science 276:1971 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cohen JR. 1999. In God's garden: creation and cloning in Jewish thought.. Hastings Cent. Rep. 29(4):7–112 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dixon M. 1995. Monitoring Attitudes of the Public. Washington, DC: Am. Counc. Life Insur 15 pp. [Google Scholar]
  16. Dunn LC, Dobzhansky TH. 1946. Heredity, Race and Society. New York: N. Am. Libr 144 pp. [Google Scholar]
  17. Editorial 1999. Who's afraid of genetically modified food?. The Economist: June 19 15
  18. Elliott CM. 1994. Genetically engineered tomato approved for market.. Bioworld, Sept. 17 4 [Google Scholar]
  19. Enserink M. 1999. The Lancet scolded over Pusztai paper.. Science 286:656 [Google Scholar]
  20. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 1995. Compliance Manual,902–5 Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Print. Off [Google Scholar]
  21. Galton F. 1869. Hereditary Genius: An Inquiry into Its Laws and Consequences. London: Macmillan 390 pp. [Google Scholar]
  22. Geller LN, Alper JS, Billings PR, Barash CI, Beckwith J. et al. 1996. Individual, family, and societal dimensions of genetic discrimination: a case study analysis.. Sci. Eng. Ethics 2(1):71–88 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hall JL, Engel D, Motta GL, Gindoff PR, Stillman RJ. 1993. Experimental cloning of human polyploid embryos using an artificial zona pellucida.. Am. Fertility Soc. Program Suppl. (Abstr.) of the Scientific Oral and Poster Sessions (S1 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hall MA, Rich SS. 2000. The impact on genetic discrimination of laws restricting health insurers' use of genetic information.. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66:293–308 [Google Scholar]
  25. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Public Law 20th Congr. 110:104–91., 10th sess., 1996. 110 Stat. 1955. 42 U.S. Code 201 et seq
  26. Hernnstein RJ, Murray C. 1994. The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: Free Press 845 pp. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hietala M, Hankonen A, Aro AR, Niemela P, Peltonen L. et al. 1995. Attitudes toward genetic testing among the general population and relatives of patients with a severe genetic disease: a survey from Finland.. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 56:1493–500 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hoge W. 1999. Britons skirmish over genetically modified crops.. New York Times, Aug 23 A3 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hook EB. 1973. Behavioral implications of the human XYY genotype.. Science 179:139–45 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hudson KL, Rothenberg KH, Andrews LB, Ellis Kahn MJE, Collins FS. 1995. Genetic discrimination and health insurance: an urgent need for reform.. Science 270:391–93 [Google Scholar]
  31. Jacobs PA, Brinton M, Melville MM, Brittain RP, McClermont WF. 1965. Aggressive behavior, mental subnormality and the XYY male.. Nature 208:1351–55 [Google Scholar]
  32. Jensen AR. 1969. How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement?. Harv. Educ. Rev. 39:1–123 [Google Scholar]
  33. Johnson D. 1999. France's fickle appetite.. New York Times, Aug 2 A19 [Google Scholar]
  34. Johnson JA. 1991. CRS Issue Brief: Genetic Screening. Washington, DC: Congr. Res. Serv., Libr. Congr 15 pp. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kilman S. 1999. Biotech scare sweeps Europe, and companies wonder if US is next.. Wall Street J., Oct 7 A1 [Google Scholar]
  36. Lapham VE, Kozma C, Weiss JO. 1996. Genetic discrimination: perspectives of consumers.. Science 274:621–24 [Google Scholar]
  37. Leary W. 1995. Using gene tests to deny jobs is ruled illegal.. New York Times, Apr 1 A47 [Google Scholar]
  38. Losey JJE, Rayor LS, Carter ME. 1999. Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae.. Nature 399:214 [Google Scholar]
  39. Loving v. Virginia 1967. 388 U.S. 1
  40. Lowden JA. 1992. Genetic discrimination and insurance underwriting.. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 51:901–3 [Google Scholar]
  41. McEwen JE, McCarty K, Reilly PR. 1992. A survey of state insurance commissioners concerning genetic testing and life insurance.. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 51:785–92 [Google Scholar]
  42. McEwen JE, McCarty K, Reilly PR. 1993. A survey of medical directors of life insurance companies concerning use of genetic information.. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 53:33–45 [Google Scholar]
  43. McEwen JE, Reilly PR. 1992. State legislative efforts to regulate use and potential misuse of genetic information.. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 51:637–47 [Google Scholar]
  44. McGinley L, Fawcett A. 1999. Patients and abortion foes clash on stem cell research.. Wall Street J., June 21 A28 [Google Scholar]
  45. Miller HI. 1999. A rational approach to labeling biotech-derived foods.. Science 284:1471–72 [Google Scholar]
  46. Murphy K. 1999. More buyers asking: Got milk without chemicals?. New York Times, Aug 1 D6 [Google Scholar]
  47. National Bioethics Advisory Commission 1999. Ethical Issues in Human Stem Cell Research. Rockville, MD: Natl. Bioeth. Advis. Comm61 [Google Scholar]
  48. Nelkin D, Lindee SM. 1995. The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon. New York: Freeman 248 pp. [Google Scholar]
  49. Pollack A. 1999. A disputed study suggests possible harm from genetically altered food.. New York Times, Oct 15 A19 [Google Scholar]
  50. Reilly PR. 1975. Genetic screening legislation. In Advances in Human Genetics V, ed. H Harris, K Hirschhorn, Vol. 5 319–76 New York: Plenum. 385 pp [Google Scholar]
  51. Reilly PR. 1991. The Surgical Solution: A History of Involuntary Sterilization in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press 191 pp. [Google Scholar]
  52. Reilly PR. 1997. Laws to regulate the use of genetic information. In Genetic Secrets: Protecting Privacy and Confidentiality in the Genetic Era, ed. M Rothstein 369–91 New Haven: Yale Univ. Press. 511 pp [Google Scholar]
  53. National Bioethics Advisory Commission 1997. Cloning Human Beings.. Rep. Recomm. Natl. Bioeth. Advis. Comm. Natl Bioeth. Advis. Comm., Rockville, Md
  54. Robertson J. 1999. Ethics and policy in embryonic stem cell research.. Kennedy Inst. Ethics J. 9(2):109–36 [Google Scholar]
  55. Roe v. Wade 1970. 410 U.S. 113
  56. Rothenberg K. 1995. Genetic information and health insurance: state legislative approaches.. J. Law. Med. Ethics 23:309–15 [Google Scholar]
  57. Sager M. 1999. The smartest man in America.. Esquire May 147 [Google Scholar]
  58. Shamblott MJ, Axelman J, Wang S, Bugg EM, Littlefield JW. et al. 1998. Derivation of pluripotent stem cells from cultured human primordial germ cells.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:13726–31 [Google Scholar]
  59. Shapiro HT. 1999. Ethical dilemmas and stem cell research.. Science 285:2065 [Google Scholar]
  60. Silver LM. 1997. Remaking Eden: Cloning and Beyond in a Brave New World. New York: Avon 317 pp. [Google Scholar]
  61. Singer E, Corning A, Lamias M. 1998. The polls-trends: genetic testing, engineering and therapy (awareness and attitudes).. Public Opin. Q. 62:633–64 [Google Scholar]
  62. Snow CP. 1961. The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press 58 pp. [Google Scholar]
  63. Spoth B, Strauss E. 1999. Screening for genetically modified organisms in food using Promega's wizard resin.. Promega Notes 73:21–23 [Google Scholar]
  64. Stent GS. 1969. The Coming of the Golden Age. Garden City, NY: Nat. Hist. Press 146 pp. [Google Scholar]
  65. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Elder J, Shapiro S. 1998. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts.. Science 282:1145–47 [Google Scholar]
  66. Westin AF. 1994. Report on national opinion surveys relating to genetic testing, screening, and uses of genetic information, with implications for a national survey focused on privacy issues and safeguards.. ELSI Program (Part 2, pp. 1–22). Washington, DC: US Dep. Energy
  67. Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J, Kind AJ, Campbell KH. 1997. Viable offspring derived form fetal and adult mammalian cells.. Nature 385:810–13 [Google Scholar]
  68. Wilson EO. 1975. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press 880 pp. [Google Scholar]
  69. Yoon CK. 1999. Altered corn may imperil butterfly, researchers say.. New York Times, May 20. p. A1
  70. Yoon CK. 1999. No consensus on the effects of altered corn on butterflies.. New York Times, Nov. 2 A16 [Google Scholar]
  71. Yoon CK. 1999. Squash with altered genes raises fears of superweeds.. New York Times, Nov. 23 A22 [Google Scholar]
  72. Zawada WM. 1998. Somatic cell cloned transgenic bovine neurons for transplantation in parkinsonian rats.. Nat. Med. 4:569–72 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.genom.1.1.485
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error