A person who knows a word knows much more than its meaning and pronunciation. The contexts in which a word can be used to express a particular meaning are a critical component of word knowledge. The ability to exploit context in order to determine meaning and resolve potential ambiguities is not a uniquely linguistic ability, but it is dramatically illustrated in the ease with which native speakers are able to identify the intended meanings of common polysemous words.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Literature Cited

  1. Anglin JM. 1993. Vocabulary development: a morphological analysis.. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 58(10), Ser. 238:1–166 [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkins BTS. 1992/1993. Theoretical lexicography and its relation to dictionary-making.. Dictionaries: J. Dict. Soc. North Am. 14:4–39 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bar-Hillel Y. 1960. A demonstration of the nonfeasibility of fully automatic high quality translation. In Advances in Computers, ed. FL Alt 1158–63 New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
  4. Beck I, McKeown M. 1991. Conditions of vocabulary acquisition. In Handbook of Reading Research, ed. R Barr, LM Kamil, PB Mosenthal, PD Pearson 2789–814 New York: Longman [Google Scholar]
  5. Binet A, Simon T. 1911. The Development of Intelligence in Children. Transl. ES Kite, 1916. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins [Google Scholar]
  6. Bühler K. 1934. Sprachtheorie: die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Gustav Fischer [Google Scholar]
  7. Carnap R. 1956. Meaning and Necessity. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press. 2nd ed [Google Scholar]
  8. Charles WG. 1988. The categorization of sentential contexts.. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 17:403–11 [Google Scholar]
  9. Choueka Y, Lusignan S. 1985. Disambiguation by short contexts.. Comput. Humanit. 19:147–57 [Google Scholar]
  10. Collins AM, Quillian MR. 1969. Retrieval time from semantic memory.. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 8:240–47 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cronbach LJ. 1942. An analysis of techniques for systematic vocabulary testing.. J. Educ. Res. 36:206–17 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cruse DA. 1986. Lexical Semantics. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  13. de Saussure F. 1916. Cours de Linguistique Générale.. Transl. W. Baskin, 1959, in Course in General Linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library
  14. Fellbaum C. ed 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  15. Fodor JA. 1983. Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  16. Gale W, Church KW, Yarowsky D. 1992. A method for disambiguating word senses in a large corpus.. AT&T Bell Labs. Stat. Res. Rep. 104 [Google Scholar]
  17. Galton F. 1879. Psychometric experiments.. Brain 2:149–62 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gray W, Holmes E. 1938. The Development of Meaning Vocabularies in Reading. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  19. Hirst G. 1987. Semantic Interpretation and the Resolution of Ambiguity. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  20. Jackendoff RS. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  21. Jastrezembski JE. 1981. Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon.. Cogn. Psychol. 13:278–305 [Google Scholar]
  22. Jenkins JR, Stein M, Wysocki K. 1984. Learning vocabulary through reading.. Am. Educ. Res. J. 21:767–87 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kaplan A. 1955. An experimental study of ambiguity and context.. Mech. Transl. 2:39–46 [Google Scholar]
  24. Katz J. 1964. Semantic theory and the meaning of ‘good’.. J. Philos. 61:739–66 [Google Scholar]
  25. Katz J, Fodor JA. 1963. The structure of a semantic theory.. Language 39:170–210 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kintsch W. 1972. The Representation of Meaning in Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
  27. Landau SI. 1984. Dictionaries: The Art and Craft of Lexicography. New York: Scribner's [Google Scholar]
  28. Leacock C, Chodorow M, Miller GA. 1998. Using corpus statistics and WordNet relations for sense identification.. Comput. Ling. 24: In press [Google Scholar]
  29. Leacock C, Towell G, Voorhees EM. 1996. Towards building contextual representations of word senses using statistical models. In Corpus Processing for Lexical Acquisition, ed. B Boguraev, J Pustejovsky 97–113 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  30. Lyons J. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  31. Marconi D. 1997. Lexical Competence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  32. Marslen-Wilson WD. 1987. Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition.. Cognition 25:71–102 [Google Scholar]
  33. Mel'cuk I, Zholkovsky A. 1988. The explanatory combinatorial dictionary. In Relational Models of the Lexicon; Representing Knowledge in Semantic Networks, ed. MW Evens 41–74 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  34. Miller GA. 1978. Semantic relations among words. In Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality, ed. M Halle, J Bresnan, GA Miller 61–118 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  35. Miller GA. 1985. WordNet: A dictionary browser. Information in Data, Proc. Conf. Univ. Waterloo Cent. New Oxf. Engl. Dict., 1st 25–28 Waterloo, Ont., Can: Univ. Waterloo Cent. New Oxf. Engl. Dict [Google Scholar]
  36. Miller GA. 1996. Contextuality. In Mental Models in Cognitive Science: Essays in Honour of Phil Johnson-Laird, ed. J Oakhill, A Garnham 1–18 East Sussex, England: Psychology Press [Google Scholar]
  37. Miller GA, Charles WG. 1991. Contextual correlates of semantic similarity.. Lang. Cogn. Proc. 6:1–28 [Google Scholar]
  38. Miller GA, Johnson-Laird PN. 1976. Language and Perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  39. Miller GA, Leacock C. 1998. Lexical representations for sentence processing.. In Polysemy: Theoretical and Computational Approaches, ed. Y Ravin, C Leacock. New York: Oxford Univ. Press. In press
  40. Montague R. 1974. Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  41. Moss HE, McCormick SF, Tyler LK. 1997. The time course of activation of semantic information during spoken word recognition.. Lang. Cogn. Proc. 12:695–731 [Google Scholar]
  42. Nagy WE, Anderson RC, Herman PA. 1987. Learning word meanings from context during normal reading.. Am. Educ. Res. J. 24:237–70 [Google Scholar]
  43. Ogden CK. 1934. The System of Basic English. New York: Harcourt Brace [Google Scholar]
  44. Pustejovsky J. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  45. Quillian MR. 1968. Semantic memory. In Semantic Information Processing, ed. M Minsky 216–70 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  46. Resnik PS. 1993. Selection and information: a class-based approach to lexical relationships.. PhD thesis. Univ. Penn., Phila
  47. Seashore RH, Eckerson LD. 1940. The measurement of individual differences in general English vocabularies.. J. Educ. Psychol. 31:14–37 [Google Scholar]
  48. Shannon CE. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication.. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27:379–423 [Google Scholar]
  49. Simpson GB. 1994. Context and the processing of ambiguous words. In Handbook of Psycholinguistics, ed. MA Gernsbacher 359–74 San Diego, CA: Academic [Google Scholar]
  50. Smith EE. 1978. Theories of semantic memory. In Handbook of Learning and Cognitive Processes: Linguistic Functions in Cognitive Theory, ed. WK Estes 61–56 Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
  51. Sternberg RJ, Powell JS. 1983. Comprehending verbal comprehension.. Am. Psychol. 38:878–93 [Google Scholar]
  52. Thorndike EL. 1921. The Teacher's Word Book. New York: Teachers Coll., Columbia Univ [Google Scholar]
  53. Weiss S. 1973. Learning to disambiguate.. Inform. Stor. Retr. 9:33–41 [Google Scholar]
  54. Werner H, Kaplan E. 1950. Development of word meaning through verbal context: an experimental study.. J. Psychol. 29:251–57 [Google Scholar]
  55. Zipf GK. 1945. The meaning-frequency relationship of words.. J. Gen. Psychol. 33:251–56 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error