1932

Abstract

Abstract 

In this article, we review some of the most provocative experimental results to have emerged from comparative labs in the past few years, starting with research focusing on contingency learning and finishing with experiments exploring nonhuman animals' understanding of causal-logical relations. Although the theoretical explanation for these results is often inchoate, a clear pattern nevertheless emerges. The comparative evidence does not fit comfortably into either the traditional associationist or inferential alternatives that have dominated comparative debate for many decades now. Indeed, the similarities and differences between human and nonhuman causal cognition seem to be much more multifarious than these dichotomous alternatives allow.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085555
2007-01-10
2024-06-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085555
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085555
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error