1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Economics
  4. Volume 12, 2020
  5. Article

Annual Review of Economics

Volume 12, 2020

On Measuring Global Poverty

Abstract

This article critically assesses prevailing measures of global poverty. A welfarist interpretation of global poverty lines is augmented by the idea of normative functionings, the cost of which varies across countries. In this light, current absolute measures are seen to ignore important social effects on welfare, while popular, strongly relative measures ignore absolute levels of living. It is argued that a new hybrid measure is called for, combining absolute and weakly relative measures consistent with how national lines vary across countries. Illustrative calculations indicate that we are seeing a falling incidence of poverty globally over the past 30 years. This is mainly due to lower absolute poverty counts in the developing world. While fewer people are poor by the global absolute standard, more are poor by the country-specific relative standard. The vast bulk of poverty, both absolute and relative, is now found in the developing world.

Keyword(s): functionings, JEL I32, JEL O10, nutrition, poverty, poverty lines, prices, relative income
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-022924
2020-08-02
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/economics/12/1/annurev-economics-081919-022924.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-022924&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Allen R. 2016. Absolute poverty: when necessity displaces desire Discuss. Pap. Econ. Soc. Hist. 141, Oxf. Univ Oxford, UK:
  2. Allen R. 2017. Absolute poverty: when necessity displaces desire. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:123690–721
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Atkin D. 2016. The calorie costs of culture: evidence from India migrants. Am. Econ. Rev. 106:41144–81
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Atkinson AB. 1987. On the measurement of poverty. Econometrica 55:749–64
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Atkinson AB. 2019. Measuring Poverty Around the World Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  6. Atkinson AB, Bourguignon F. 2001. Poverty and inclusion from a world perspective. Governance, Equity and Global Markets JE Stiglitz, P-A Muet 151–64 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Banerjee A, Duflo E. 2008. What is middle class about the middle classes around the world. J. Econ. Perspect. 22:23–28
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bowley AL. 1915. The Nature and Purpose of the Measurement of Social Phenomena London: P.S. King Sons
  9. Browning M. 1992. Children and household economic behavior. J. Econ. Lit. 30:1434–75
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Chakravarty S, Chattopadhyay N, Nissanov Z, Silber J 2015. Reference groups and the poverty line: an axiomatic approach with an empirical illustration WIDER Work. Pap. 2015/002, UNU-WIDER Helsinki, Finl.:
  11. Chen S, Ravallion M. 2001. How did the world's poor fare in the 1990s. Rev. Income Wealth 47:3283–300
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen S, Ravallion M. 2010. The developing world is poorer than we thought, but no less successful in the fight against poverty. Q. J. Econ. 125:41577–625
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen S, Ravallion M. 2013. More relatively poor people in a less absolutely poor world. Rev. Income Wealth 59:11–28
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Citro C, Michael R. 1995. Measuring Poverty: A New Approach Washington, DC: Natl. Acad.
  15. Clark A, Frijters P, Shields M 2008. Relative income, happiness and utility: an explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. J. Econ. Lit. 46:195–144
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Cohn A, Fehr E, Herrmann B, Schneider F 2014. Social comparison and effort provision: evidence from a field experiment. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 12:4877–98
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Datt G, Ravallion M. 2011. Has India's economic growth become more pro-poor in the wake of economic reforms. World Bank Econ. Rev. 25:2157–89
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Davis J. 1959. A formal interpretation of the theory of relative deprivation. Sociometry 22:280–96
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Deaton A. 2010. Price indices, inequality and the measurement of poverty. Am. Econ. Rev. 100:15–34
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Deaton A, Dupriez O. 2011. Purchasing power parity exchange rates for the global poor. Am. Econ. J.: Appl. Econ. 3:2137–66
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Deaton A, Heston A. 2010. Understanding PPPs and PPP-based national accounts. Am. Econ. J.: Macro-economics 2:41–35
     [Google Scholar]
  22. de Mesnard L. 2007. Poverty reduction: the paradox of the endogenous poverty line LEG Econ. Ser. Work. Pap. 2007–05 Univ. Bourgogne Dijon, Fr.:
  23. Dikhanov Y, Hamadeh N, Vigil-Oliver W, Degefu TB, Song I 2017. Poverty-specific purchasing power parities in Africa Policy Res. Work. Pap. 8150 World Bank Washington, DC:
  24. Dimri A, Maniquet F. 2019. Income poverty measurement in India: defining group-specific poverty lines or taking preferences into account?. J. Econ. Inequal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-019-09434-6
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  25. Duesenberry JS. 1949. Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behavior Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  26. Duh J, Spears D. 2016. Health and hunger: disease, energy needs and the Indian calorie consumption puzzle. Econ. J. 127:2378–409
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Easterlin RA. 1974. Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. Nations and Households in Economic Growth PA David, WR Melvin 89–125 Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Easton B. 2002. Beware the median. Soc. Policy Res. Cent. Newsl. 82:6–7
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Ferreira F. 2017. Global poverty today, the 1908 winter in St. Petersburg, and ‘controversy bias. World Bank/Let's Talk Development Dec. 11. https://blogs.worldbank.org/developmenttalk/global-poverty-today-1908-winter-st-petersburg-and-controversy-bias
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ferreira F, Chen S, Dabalen A, Dikhanov Y, Hamadeh N et al. 2016. A global count of the extreme poor in 2012: data issues, methodology and initial results. J. Econ. Inequal. 14:141–72
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Foster J. 1998. Absolute versus relative poverty.. Papers and Proceedings of the Hundred and Tenth Annual Meeting of the American Economic AssociationVol. 88, No. 2, ed. JD Baldwin, RL Oaxaca 335–41 Chicago: Am. Econ. Assoc.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Frank RH. 1985. Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  33. Frey B, Stutzer A. 2002. What can economists learn from happiness research. J. Econ. Lit. 40:402–35
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Fuchs V. 1967. Redefining poverty and redistributing income. Public Interest 8:88–95
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Fuller CJ. 1992. The Camphor Flame. Popular Hinduism and Society in India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  36. Garroway C, de Laiglesia JR 2012. On the relevance of relative poverty for developing countries OECD Dev. Cent. Work. Pap. 314 OECD Paris:
  37. Geertz C. 1976. The Religion of Java Chicago/London: Univ. Chicago Press
  38. Hanson K. 2008. Mollie Orshansky's strategy to poverty measurement as a relationship between household food expenditures and economy food plan. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 30:3572–80
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Hirsch F. 1977. The Social Limits to Growth London: Routledge Kegan Paul
  40. Hirvonen K, Bai Y, Headey D, Masters WA 2019. Affordability of the EAT-Lancet reference diet: a global analysis. Lancet 8:1E59–66
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Jolliffe D, Prydz E. 2017. Global societal poverty: a relative and relevant measure Policy Res. Work. Pap. 8073 World Bank Washington, DC:
  42. Kakwani N. 1986. Analyzing Redistribution Policies: A Study Using Australian Data Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  43. Kampke T. 2010. The use of mean values versus medians in inequality analysis. J. Econ. Soc. Meas. 35:43–62
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Knight J, Song L, Gunatilaka R 2009. Subjective well-being and its determinants in rural China. China Econ. Rev. 20:4635–49
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Lindgren M. 2015. The elusive quest for the subsistence line: How much does the cost of survival vary between populations? Comp. Inst. Anal. Work. Pap. 2015:1 Lund Univ Lund, Sweden:
  46. Luttmer E. 2005. Neighbors as negatives: relative earnings and well-being. Q. J. Econ. 120:963–1002
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Masters WA, Bai Y, Herforth A, Sarpong DB, Mishili F et al. 2018. Measuring the affordability of nutritious diets in Africa: price indexes for diet diversity and the cost of nutrient adequacy. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 100:51285–301
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Milanovic B. 2008. Qat expenditures in Yemen and Djibouti: an empirical analysis. J. Afr. Econ. 17:5661–87
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Orshansky M. 1965. Counting the poor: another look at the poverty profile. Soc. Secur. Bull. 28:3–29
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Rao V. 2001. Poverty and public celebrations in rural India. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 573:185–104
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Ravallion M. 2008. On the welfarist rationale for relative poverty lines. Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen, Vol. I: Ethics, Welfare, and Measurement K Basu, R Kanbur 375–96 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Ravallion M. 2011. On multidimensional indices of poverty. J. Econ. Inequal. 9:2235–48
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Ravallion M. 2012. Poverty lines across the world. The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Poverty PN Jefferson 75–104 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Ravallion M. 2013. How long will it take to lift one billion people out of poverty. World Bank Res. Obs. 28:2139–58
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Ravallion M. 2016. The Economics of Poverty: History, Measurement, and Policy New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  56. Ravallion M. 2017. An interesting step backwards in measuring global poverty. Economics & Poverty Dec. 3. https://examplewordpresscom61323.files.wordpress.com/2017/12/comments-robert-allen-absolute-poverty-aer.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Ravallion M. 2018. An exploration of the changes in the International Comparison Program's global economic landscape. World Dev 105:201–16
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Ravallion M, Chen S. 2011. Weakly relative poverty. Rev. Econ. Stat. 93:41251–61
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Ravallion M, Chen S. 2019. Global poverty measurement when relative income matters. J. Public Econ. 177:104046
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Ravallion M, Chen S, Sangraula P 2009. Dollar a day revisited. World Bank Econ. Rev. 23:2163–84
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Ravallion M, Datt G, van de Walle D 1991. Quantifying absolute poverty in the developing world. Rev. Income Wealth 37:345–61
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Ravallion M, van de Walle D 1991. The impact on poverty of food pricing reforms: a welfare analysis for Indonesia. J. Policy Model. 13:281–99
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Runciman WG. 1966. Relative Deprivation and Social Justice London: Routledge Kegan Paul
  64. Sen A. 1981. Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  65. Sen A. 1983. Poor, relatively speaking. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 35:2153–69
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Sen A. 1985. Commodities and Capabilities Amsterdam: North-Holland
  67. Sen A. 1987. The Standard of Living Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  68. Senik C. 2005. Income distribution and well-being: What can we learn from subjective data. J. Econ. Surv. 19:143–63
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Short K. 2012. The research supplemental poverty measure: 2011 Curr. Popul. Rep. P60-244 US Census Bur Washington, DC:
  70. Smith H, Pettigrew T, Pippin G, Bialosiewicz S 2012. Relative deprivation: a theoretical and meta-analytic critique. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 16:3203–32
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Smith V. 1959. Linear programming models for the determination of palatable human diets. J. Farm Econ. 41:2272–83
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Stigler G. 1945. The cost of subsistence. J. Farm Econ. 27:2303–14
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Summers R, Heston A. 1991. The Penn World Table (Mark 5): an extended set of international comparisons, 1950–1988. Q. J. Econ. 106:327–68
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Townsend P. 1979. Poverty in the United Kingdom: A Survey of Household Resources and Standards of Living Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books
  75. UNDP (United Nations Dev. Program) 2005. Human Development Report New York: UNDP
  76. Walker R. 2014. The Shame of Poverty Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  77. World Bank 1990. World Development Report: Poverty New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  78. World Bank 2018. Piecing Together the Poverty Puzzle Washington, DC: World Bank
  79. WHO (World Health Organ.) 1985. Energy and Protein Requirements Tech. Rep. Ser. 724 WHO Geneva:
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-022924
Loading
On Measuring Global Poverty
Annual Review of Economics 12, 167 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-022924
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-022924
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-022924
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error