1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics
  4. Volume 52, 2020
  5. Article

Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics

Volume 52, 2020

Aeroacoustics of Silent Owl Flight

Abstract

The ability of some species of owl to fly in effective silence is unique among birds and provides a distinct hunting advantage, but it remains a mystery as to exactly what aspects of the owl and its flight are responsible for this dramatic noise reduction. Crucially, this mystery extends to how the flow physics may be leveraged to generate noise-reduction strategies for wider technological application. We review current knowledge of aerodynamic noise from owls, ranging from live owl noise measurements to mathematical modeling and experiments focused on how owls may disrupt the standard routes of noise generation. Specialized adaptations and foraging strategies are not uniform across all owl species: Some species may not have need for silent flight, or their evolutionary adaptations may not be effective for useful noise reduction for certain species. This hypothesis is examined using mathematical models and borne out where possible by noise measurements and morphological observations of owl feathers and wings.

Keyword(s): aeroacoustics, noise generation, owl morphology, silent flight
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040436
2020-01-05
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/fluid/52/1/annurev-fluid-010518-040436.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040436&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Amiet RK 1976. Noise due to turbulent flow past a trailing edge. J. Sound Vib. 47:387–93
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Antonia RA, Luxton RE 1972. The response of a turbulent boundary layer to a step change in surface roughness. Part 2. Rough-to-smooth. J. Fluid Mech. 53:737–57
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Ayton LJ, Chaitanya P 2017. Analytical and experimental investigation into the effects of leading-edge radius on gust–aerofoil interaction noise. J. Fluid Mech. 829:780–808
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Ayton LJ, Peake N 2016. Interaction of turbulence with the leading-edge stagnation point of a thin aerofoil. J. Fluid Mech. 798:436–56
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bachmann TW 2010. Anatomical, morphometrical and biomechanical studies of barn owls’ and pigeons’ wings PhD Thesis, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Ger.
  6. Bachmann T, Blazek S, Erlinghagen T, Baumgartner W, Wagner H 2012a. Barn owl flight. Nature-Inspired Fluid Mechanics , ed. C Tropea, H Bleckmann, pp. 101–17 Berlin: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bachmann T, Klän S, Baumgartner W, Klaas M, Schröder W, Wagner H 2007. Morphometric characterisation of wing feathers of the barn owl Tyto alba pratincola and the pigeon Columba livia. Front. Zool. 4:23
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bachmann T, Mühlenbruch G, Wagner H 2011. The barn owl wing: An inspiration for silent flight in the aviation industry. Bioinspiration, Biomimetics, and Bioreplication RJ Martin-Palma, A Lakhtakia, Pap. 7975 0N. Bellingham: WA: SPIE
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bachmann T, Wagner H 2011. The three-dimensional shape of serrations at barn owl wings: towards a typical natural serration as a role model for biomimetic applications. J. Anat. 219:192–202
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bachmann T, Wagner H, Tropea C 2012b. Inner vane fringes of barn owl feathers reconsidered: morphometric data and functional aspects. J. Anat. 221:1–8
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bodling A, Sharma A 2019a. Numerical investigation of low-noise airfoils inspired by the down coat of owls. Bioinspir. Biomimet. 14:016013
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bodling A, Sharma A 2019b. Numerical investigation of noise reduction mechanisms in a bio-inspired airfoil. J. Sound Vib. 453:314–27
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bostwick KS, Prum RO 2003. High-speed video analysis of wing-snapping in two manakin clades (Pipridae: Aves). J. Exp. Biol. 206:3693–706
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Brooks TF, Pope DS, Marcolini MA 1989. Airfoil self-noise and prediction NASA Tech. Rep. 1218, NASA, Washington, DC A landmark experimental study of airfoil trailing-edge noise across a very broad parameter range.
  15. Cannell PA 1975. Edge scattering of aerodynamic sound by a lightly loaded elastic half-plane. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 347:213–38
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Cannell PA 1976. Acoustic edge scattering by a heavily loaded elastic half-plane. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 350:71–89
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Cavalieri AVG, Wolf WR, Jaworski JW 2016. Numerical solution of acoustic scattering by finite perforated elastic plates. Proc. R. Soc. A 472:20150767A key numerical investigation of the effects of porosity and elasticity on noise from finite-chord airfoils.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Chaitanya P, Joseph P, Narayanan S, Vanderwel C, Turner J et al. 2017. Performance and mechanism of sinusoidal leading edge serrations for the reduction of turbulence–aerofoil interaction noise. J. Fluid Mech. 818:435–64
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Chavarin A, Luhar M 2019. Resolvent analysis for turbulent channel flow with riblets. AIAA J. In press
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Choi H, Moin P, Kim J 1993. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over riblets. J. Fluid Mech. 255:503–39
     [Google Scholar]
  21. CAA (Civil Aviat. Auth.) 2018. Departure noise mitigation: main report Tech. Rep. 1691, Civil Aviat. Auth., West Sussex, UK
  22. Clark CJ 2016. Locomotion-induced sounds and sonations: mechanisms, communication function, and relationship with behavior. Vertebrate Sound Production and Acoustic Communication R Suthers, W Fitch, R Fay, A Popper, pp. 83–117 Cham, Switz.: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Clark CJ, Prum RO 2015. Aeroelastic flutter of feathers, flight and the evolution of non-vocal communication in birds. J. Exp. Biol. 218:3520–27
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Clark IA 2017. Bio-inspired control of roughness and trailing edge noisePhD Thesis, Virginia Polytech. Inst. State Univ., Blacksburg, VA
  25. Clark IA, Alexander WN, Devenport W, Glegg S, Jaworski JW et al. 2015. Bio-inspired trailing edge noise control Paper presented at AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 21st, Dallas, TX, AIAA Pap. 2015-2365
  26. Clark IA, Alexander WN, Devenport W, Glegg S, Jaworski JW et al. 2017. Bioinspired trailing-edge noise control. AIAA J. 55:740–54Wind tunnel demonstration of an owl-inspired trailing-edge noise control device.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Clark IA, Daly CA, Devenport W, Alexander WN, Peake N et al. 2016. Bio-inspired canopies for the reduction of roughness noise. J. Sound Vib. 385:33–54
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Crighton DG 1975. Basic principles of aerodynamic noise generation. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 16:31–96
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Crighton DG 1991. Airframe noise. Aeroacoustics of Flight Vehicles: Theory and Practice 1 Noise Sources, ed. HH Hubbard, pp. 391–447 Hampton, VA: NASA Langley Res. Cent.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Crighton DG, Leppington FG 1970. Scattering of aerodynamic noise by a semi-infinite compliant plate. J. Fluid Mech. 43:721–36
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Curle N 1955. The influence of solid boundaries upon aerodynamic sound. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 231:505–14
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Dowell EH 2015. A Modern Course in Aeroelasticity Dordrecht, Neth.: Kluwer Acad. 5th ed.
  33. Dubois AD 1924. A nuptial song-flight of the short-eared owl. Auk 41:260–63
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Dyson ML, Klump GM, Gauger B 1998. Absolute hearing thresholds and critical masking ratios in the European barn owl: a comparison with other owls. J. Comp. Physiol. A 182:695–702
     [Google Scholar]
  35. FAA (Fed. Aviat. Admin.) 2019. Continuous lower energy, emissions, and noise (CLEEN) program accessed Feb. 19. https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/apl/research/aircraft_technology/cleen/
  36. Ffowcs Williams JE 1972. The acoustics of turbulence near sound-absorbent liners. J. Fluid Mech. 51:737–49
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Ffowcs Williams JE 1977. Aeroacoustics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 9:447–68
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Ffowcs Williams JE, Hall LE 1970. Aerodynamic sound generation by turbulent flow in the vicinity of a scattering half plane. J. Fluid Mech. 40:657–60The first paper to identify the famous fifth-power Mach number dependence of trailing-edge noise.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Finez A, Jondeau E, Roger M, Jacob MC 2010. Broadband noise reduction with trailing edge brushesPaper presented at AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 13th, Stockholm, AIAA Pap. 2010-3980
  40. Fink MR, Bailey DA 1980. Airframe noise reduction studies and clean-airframe noise investigation NASA Contract. Rep. 159311, NASA Washington, DC:
  41. Finnigan J 2000. Turbulence in plant canopies. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32:519–71
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Fournier JP, Dawson JW, Mikhail A, Yack JE 2013. If a bird flies in the forest, does an insect hear it. Biol. Lett. 920130319
     [Google Scholar]
  43. George AR, Najjar FE, Kim YN 1980. Noise due to tip vortex formation on lifting rotors Paper presented at Aeroacoustics Conference, 6th Hartford, CT: AIAA Pap1980–1010
  44. Geyer TF, Claus VT, Hall PM, Sarradj E 2017. Silent owl flight: the effect of the leading edge comb. Int. J. Aeroacoustics 16:115–34A detailed experimental study, including acoustic source location, using prepared owl wings to demonstrate the possible role of the leading-edge comb in silent flight at high angles of attack.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Geyer TF, Sarradj E 2014. Trailing edge noise of partially porous airfoils Paper presented at AIAA/CEAS Aero-acoustics Conference, 20th Atlanta, GA: AIAA Pap 2014-3039.
  46. Geyer TF, Sarradj E, Fritzsche C 2009. Silent owl flight: experiments in the aeroacoustic wind tunnel. NAG/DAGA International Conference on Acoustics MM Boone, pp. 734–36 Red Hook, NY: Curran
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Geyer TF, Sarradj E, Fritzsche C 2010. Measurement of the noise generation at the trailing edge of porous airfoils. Exp. Fluids 48:291–308
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Geyer TF, Sarradj E, Fritzsche C 2013. Silent owl flight: comparative acoustic wind tunnel measurements on prepared wings. Acta Acust. United Acust. 99:139–53
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Graham RR 1934. The silent flight of owls. J. R. Aeronaut. Soc. 38:837–43
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Gruschka HD, Borchers IU, Coble JG 1971. Aerodynamic noise produced by a gliding owl. Nature 233:409–11
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Hajian R, Jaworski JW 2017. The steady aerodynamics of aerofoils with porosity gradients. Proc. R. Soc. A 473:20170266
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Hajian R, Jaworski JW 2019. Noncirculatory fluid forces on panels with porosity gradients. AIAA J. 57:870–75
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Hayden RE 1976. Reduction of noise from airfoils and propulsive lift systems using variable impedance systemsPaper presented at AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference, 3rd, Palo Alto, CA, AIAA Pap. 1976-500
  54. Hayden RE, Kadman Y, Chanaud RC 1972. A study of the variable impedance surface concept as a means for reducing noise from jet interaction with deployed lift-augmenting flaps NASA Tech. Rep. CR-112166, NASA, Washington, DC
  55. Heffner H, Masterton B 1980. Hearing in Glires: domestic rabbit, cotton rat, feral house mouse, and kangaroo rat. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 68:1584–99
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Herr M 2007. Design criteria for low-noise trailing-edgesPaper presented at AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 13th, Rome, Italy, AIAA Pap. 2007-3470
  57. Herr M, Dobrzynski W 2005. Experimental investigations in low-noise trailing-edge design. AIAA J. 43:1167–75
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Herr M, Reichenberger J 2011. In search of airworthy trailing-edge noise reduction means Paper presented at AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 17th, Portland Oregon, AIAA Pap 2011-2780.
  59. Hersh AS, Sodermant PT, Hayden RE 1974. Investigation of acoustic effects of leading-edge serrations on airfoils. J. Aircr. 11:197–202
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Hertel H 1963. Struktur, Form, Bewegung Mainz, Ger.: Krausskopf-Verlag
  61. High Level Group Aviat. Res 2011. Flightpath 2050: Europe's vision for aviationTech. Rep., ACARE (Advis. Counc. Aeronaut. Res. Eur.), Brussels, Belg. https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/transport/files/modes/air/doc/flightpath2050.pdf
  62. Hileman J, Spakovszky Z, Drela M, Sargeant M 2007.Airframe design for “silent aircraft.” Paper presented at AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 45th, Reno, NV, AIAA Pap. 2007-453
  63. Howe MS 1978. A review of the theory of trailing edge noise. J. Sound Vib. 61:437–65
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Howe MS 1979. On the added mass of a perforated shell, with application to the generation of aerodynamic sound by a perforated trailing edge. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 365:209–33
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Howe MS 1992. Sound produced by an aerodynamic source adjacent to a partly coated, finite elastic plate. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 436:351–72
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Howe MS 1993. Structural and acoustic noise produced by turbulent flow over an elastic trailing edge. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 442:533–54
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Howe MS 2003. Theory of Vortex Sound Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  68. Intaratep N, Alexander WN, Devenport WJ, Grace SM, Dropkin A 2016. Experimental study of quadcopter acoustics and performance at static thrust conditions Paper presented at AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 22nd Lyon, France: AIAA Pap 2016-2873.
  69. Iosilevskii G 2011. Aerodynamics of permeable membrane wings. Eur. J. Mech. B 30:534–42
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Iosilevskii G 2013. Aerodynamics of permeable membrane wings. Part 2: seepage drag. Eur. J. Mech. B 39:32–41
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Jaworski JW, Peake N 2013. Aerodynamic noise from a poroelastic edge with implications for the silent flight of owls. J. Fluid Mech. 723:456–79Modeling of the effects of poroelasticity on trailing-edge noise in the context of silent owl flight.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Johnsgard PA 2002. North American Owls: Biology and Natural History Washington, DC: Smithsonian Inst. 2nd ed.
  73. Khorrami MR, Choudhari MM 2003. Application of passive porous treatment for slat trailing edge noise NASA Tech. Rep. TM-2003-212416 NASA Langley Res. Cent. Hampton, VA:
  74. Kisil A, Ayton LJ 2018. Aerodynamic noise from rigid trailing edges with finite porous extensions. J. Fluid Mech. 836:117–44
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Klän S, Bachmann T, Klaas M, Wagner H, Schröder W 2009. Experimental analysis of the flow field over a novel owl based airfoil. Exp. Fluids 46:975–89
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Klän S, Burgmann S, Bachmann T, Klaas M, Wagner H, Schröder W 2012. Surface structure and dimensional effects on the aerodynamics of an owl-based wing model. Eur. J. Mech. B 33:58–73
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Konishi M 1973. How the owl tracks its prey. Am. Sci. 61:414–24
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Kornecki A, Dowell EH, O'Brien J 1976. On the aeroelastic instability of two-dimensional panels in uniform incompressible flow. J. Sound Vib. 47:163–78
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Kroeger RA, Gruschka HD, Helvey TC 1972. Low speed aerodynamics for ultra-quiet flight Tech. Rep. AFFDL-TR-71-75, Air Force Flight Dyn. Lab., Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio Comprehensive early investigation and analysis of the mechanisms involved in the silent flight of live owls.
  80. Lighthill MJ 1952. On sound generated aerodynamically. I. General theory. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 211:564–87The seminal paper on the theory of noise generation by aerodynamic flow.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Lighthill MJ 1954. On sound generated aerodynamically. II. Turbulence as a source of sound. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 222: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1954.0049
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  82. Lilley GM 1998. A study of the silent flight of the owl Paper presented at AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 4th Toulouse, France: AIAA Pap 1998-2340.
  83. Lyu B, Ayton LJ, Chaitanya P 2019. On the acoustic optimality of leading-edge serration profiles.J. Sound Vib.In press
  84. Lyu B, Azarpeyvand M 2017. On the noise prediction for serrated leading edges. J. Fluid Mech. 826:205–34
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Lyu B, Azarpeyvand M, Sinayoko S 2016. Prediction of noise from serrated trailing edges. J. Fluid Mech. 793:556–88
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Millican AJ, Clark I, Devenport W, Alexander WN 2017. Owl-inspired trailing edge noise treatments: acoustic and flow measurements Paper presented at AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 35th Grapevine, TX: AIAA Pap 2017-1177.
  87. Myers MR, Kerschen EJ 1995. Influence of incidence angle on sound generation by airfoils interacting with high-frequency gusts. J. Fluid Mech. 292:271–304
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Neuhaus W, Bretting H, Schweizer B 1973. Morphologische und funktionelle Untersuchungen über den “lautlosen” Flug der Eulen (Strix aluco) im Vergleich zum Flug der Enten (Anas platyrhynchos). Biol. Zentral. 92:495–512
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Norberg RÅ 1970. Hunting technique of Tengmalm's owl Aegolius funereus (L.). Ornis Scand. 1:51–64
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Oerlemans S, Sijtsma P, Méndez López B 2007. Location and quantification of noise sources on a wind turbine. J. Sound Vib. 299:869–83A thorough discussion of noise sources on wind turbines, a possible application area for owl-inspired noise technology.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Payne RS 1962. How the barn owl locates its prey by hearing. Living Bird 1:151–59
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Payne RS 1971. Acoustic location of prey by barn owls (Tyto alba). J. Exp. Biol. 54:535–73
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Pimenta C, Wolf WR, Cavalieri AVG 2018. A fast numerical framework to compute acoustic scattering by poroelastic plates of arbitrary geometry. J. Comput. Phys. 373:763–83
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Rao C, Ikeda T, Nakata T, Liu H 2017. Owl-inspired leading-edge serrations play a crucial role in aerodynamic force production and sound suppression. Bioinspir. Biomimet. 12:046008
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Roulin A, Mangels J, Wakamatsu K, Bachmann T 2013. Sexually dimorphic melanin-based colour polymorphism, feather melanin content, and wing feather structure in the barn owl (Tyto alba). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 109:562–73
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Sarradj E, Fritzsche C, Geyer T 2011. Silent owl flight: flyover noise measurements. AIAA J. 49:769–79Important comparative measurements of owl noise in flight against other birds using an acoustic array.
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Seeley BA 2015. Regional sky transit Paper presented at AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, 15th Dallas, TX: AIAA Pap 2015-3184.
  98. Sharma AS, McKeon BJ 2013. On coherent structure in wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 728:196–238
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Sick H 1937. Morphologisch-funktionelle Untersuchungen über die Feinstruktur der Vogelfeder. J. Ornithol. 85:206–372
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Smits AJ, Wood DH 1985. The response of turbulent boundary layers to sudden perturbations. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 17:321–58
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Thorpe WH, Griffin DR 1962a. Lack of ultrasonic components in the flight noise of owls. Nature 193:594–95
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Thorpe WH, Griffin DR 1962b. The lack of ultrasonic components in the flight noise of owls compared with other birds. Ibis 104:256–57The earliest reported experimental observations of aerodynamic noise suppression by owls in flight.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Turner JM, Kim JW 2017. Aeroacoustic source mechanisms of a wavy leading edge undergoing vortical disturbances. J. Fluid Mech. 811:582–611
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Wagner H, Weger M, Klaas M, Schröder W 2017. Features of owl wings that promote silent flight. Interface Focus 7:20160078
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Walsh MJ 1983. Riblets as a viscous drag reduction technique. AIAA J. 21:485–86
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Wang M, Freund JB, Lele SK 2006. Computational prediction of flow-generated sound. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 38:483–512
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Weger M, Wagner H 2016. Morphological variations of leading-edge serrations in owls (Strigiformes). PLOS ONE 11:e0149236
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Weger M, Wagner H 2017. Distribution of the characteristics of barbs and barbules on barn owl wing feathers. J. Anat. 230:734–42
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Wink M, El-Sayed AA, Sauer-Gürth H, Gonzalez J 2009. Molecular phylogeny of owls (Strigiformes) inferred from DNA sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome b and the nuclear RAG-1 gene. Ardea 97:581–91
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Winzen A, Klaas M, Schröder W 2013. High-speed PIV measurements of the near-wall flow field over hairy surfaces. Exp. Fluids 54:1472
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Wolf T, Konrath R 2015. Avian wing geometry and kinematics of a free-flying barn owl in flapping flight. Exp. Fluids 56:28
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Zhou BY, Koh SR, Gauger NR, Meinke M, Schröder W 2018. A discrete adjoint framework for trailing-edge noise minimization via porous material. Comput. Fluids 172:97–108
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040436
Loading
Aeroacoustics of Silent Owl Flight
Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 52, 395 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040436
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040436
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040436
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplemental Material

Supplementary Data

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error