1932

Abstract

Reviewing recent research on poverty in the United States, we derive a conceptual framework with three main characteristics. First, poverty is multidimensional, compounding material hardship with human frailty, generational trauma, family and neighborhood violence, and broken institutions. Second, poverty is relational, produced through connections between the truly advantaged and the truly disadvantaged. Third, a component of this conceptual framework is transparently normative, applying empirical research to analyze poverty as a matter of justice, not just economics. Throughout, we discuss conceptual, methodological, and policy-relevant implications of this perspective on the study of extreme disadvantage in America.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053411
2018-07-30
2024-06-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/44/1/annurev-soc-060116-053411.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053411&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Addams J 1899. Trade unions and public duty. Am. J. Soc. 4:448–62
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Addams J 1910. Twenty Years at Hull House New York: Macmillan
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alkire S, Foster J 2011. Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. J. Public Econ. 95:476–87
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Anand S, Sen A 1997. Concepts of human development and poverty: a multidimensional perspective. Human Development Papers1–20 New York: UN Dev. Programme
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson E 2000. Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City New York: W.W. Norton
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Atkinson AB 2003. Multidimensional deprivation: contrasting social welfare and counting approaches. J. Econ. Inequal. 1:51–65
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Auyero J, Swistun DA 2009. Flammable: Environmental Suffering in an Argentine Shantytown Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Avent-Holt D, Tomaskovic-Devey D 2010. The relational basis of inequality: generic and contingent wage distribution processes. Work Occup 37:162–93
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Barry B 2005. Why Social Justice Matters Cambridge, UK: Polity
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bayley D, Shearing C 1996. The future of policing. Law Soc. Rev. 30:585–606
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Black T 2009. When a Heart Turns Rock Solid: The Lives of Three Puerto Rican Brothers on and Off the Streets New York: Pantheon
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Blau P, Duncan O 1967. The American Occupational Structure New York: Wiley
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Booth C 1903. Life and Labour of the People of London. Second Series. Industry 5 London: Macmillan
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bourgois P, Schonberg J 2009. Righteous Dopefiend Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Brauer C 1982. Kennedy, Johnson, and the War on Poverty. J. Am. Hist. 69:98–119
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Caplovitz D 1967. The Poor Pay More: Consumer Practices of Low-Income Families New York: Free Press
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Caskey J 1994. Fringe Banking: Check-Cashing Outlets, Pawnshops, and the Poor. New York: Russell: Sage Found.
  18. Chung C, Myers S 1999. Do the poor pay more for food? An analysis of grocery store availability and food price disparities. J. Consum. Aff. 33:276–96
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Citro C, Michael R 1995. Measuring Poverty: A New Approach Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Comfort M, Lopez A, Powers C, Kral A, Lorvick J 2015. How institutions deprive: ethnography, social work, and interventionist ethics among the hypermarginalized. RSF 1:1100–19
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Contreras R 2013. The Stickup Kids: Race, Drugs, Violence, and the American Dream Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Correia MM 2014. Political connections and SEC enforcement. J. Account. Econ. 57:241–62
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Dahrendorf R 1959. Class and Class Conflict Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Desmond M 2015. Severe deprivation in America: an introduction. RSF 1:1–11
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Desmond M 2016. Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City New York: Crown
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Desmond M, Papachristos A, Kirk D 2016. Police violence and citizen crime reporting in the black community. Am. Sociol. Rev. 81:857–76
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Du Bois WEB 1899. The Philadelphia Negro: A Social Study Philadelphia: Univ. Penn. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Duneier M 1999. Sidewalk New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Edelman P 2018. Not a Crime to Be Poor: The Criminalization of Poverty in America New York: The New Press
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Edin K, Shaefer HL 2015. $2 a Day: Living on Almost Nothing in America Boston: Houghton Mifflin
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Evans G 2004. The environment of childhood poverty. Am. Psychol. 59:77–92
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Fleischacker S 2004. A Short History of Distributive Justice Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Freudenberg N 2014. Lethal but Legal: Corporations, Consumption and Protecting Public Health New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Gans H 1995. The War Against the Poor New York: Basic Books
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Garland D 1991. Sociological perspectives on punishment. Crime Justice 14:115–65
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Glaeser E, Shapiro J 2003. The benefits of the home mortgage interest deduction. Tax Policy Econ 17:37–82
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Goff L 2017. Pricing justice: the wasteful enterprise of America's bail system. Brooklyn Law Rev 82:825–80
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Goffman A 2014. On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Harris A 2016. A Pound of Flesh: Monetary Sanctions as Punishment for the Poor New York: Russell Sage Found.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Harris A, Evans H, Beckett K 2011. Courtesy stigma and monetary sanctions: toward a socio-cultural theory of punishment. Am. Sociol. Rev. 76:234–64
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Heclo HH 1997. Values underpinning poverty programs for children. Future Child 7:141–48
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Henry L 2010. The jurisprudence of dignity. Univ. Penn. Law Rev. 160:169–232
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Jencks C, Smith M, Acland H, Bane MJ, Cohen D et al. 1972. Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America New York: Basic Books
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Jones N 2009. Between Good and Ghetto: African American Girls and Inner-City Violence New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Kenworthy L 2011. Progress for the Poor New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  46. LeBlanc AN 2004. Random Family: Love, Drugs, Trouble, and Coming of Age in the Bronx New York: Scribner
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Lee J 2012. Wounded: life after the shooting. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 642:244–57
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Levitas R 2005. The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour Amsterdam: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Liu J, Sakamoto A, Su K 2010. Exploitation in contemporary capitalism: an empirical analysis of the case of Taiwan. Sociol. Focus 43:259–81
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Lupien S, King S, Meaney M, McEwen B 2001. Can poverty get under your skin? Basal cortisol levels and cognitive function in children from low and high socioeconomic status. Dev. Psychopathol. 13:3653–76
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Malthus TR 1890 (1798). An Essay on the Principle of Population, 1890 Edition London: Ward, Lock and Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Marshall TH 1950. Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Marx K 1877. Capital: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production 1 New York: International Publishers
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Mullainathan S, Shafir E 2013. Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much New York: Macmillan
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Muller C, Sampson R, Winter AS 2018. Environmental inequality: the social causes and consequences of lead exposure. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 44:263–82
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Naidu S 2010. Recruitment restrictions and labor markets: evidence from the postbellum US South. J. Labor Econ. 28:413–45
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Newman K, O'Brien R 2011. Taxing the Poor: Doing Damage to the Truly Disadvantaged Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Nussbaum MC 2003. Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Fem. Econ. 9:33–59
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Nussbaum MC, Sen A 1993. The Quality of Life Oxford, UK: Clarendon:
    [Google Scholar]
  60. O'Connor A 2001. Poverty Knowledge: Social Science, Social Policy, and the Poor in Twentieth-Century US History Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Orshansky M 1963. Children of the poor. Soc. Secur. Bull. 26:3–13
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Orshansky M 1965. Counting the poor. Soc. Secur. Bull. 28:3–29
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Pager D, Shepherd H 2008. The sociology of discrimination: racial discrimination in employment, housing, credit, and consumer markets. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 34:181–209
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Perkins K, Sampson R 2015. Compounded deprivation in the transition to adulthood: the intersection of racial and economic inequality among Chicagoans, 1995–2013. RSF 1:135–54
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Petersen T, Morgan L 1995. Separate and unequal: occupation-establishment sex segregation and the gender wage gap. Am. J. Sociol. 101:329–365
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Pettit B 2012. Invisible Men: Mass Incarceration and the Myth of Black Progress New York: Russell Sage
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Polanyi K 1944. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time Boston: Beacon
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Quillian L, Pager D, Hexel O, Midtbøen AH 2017. Meta-analysis of field experiments shows no change in racial discrimination in hiring over time. PNAS 114:10870–75
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Ralph L 2014. Renegade Dreams: Living Through Injury in Gangland Chicago Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Ralph L 2015. Becoming aggrieved: an alternative framework of care in black Chicago. RSF 1:231–41
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Ravallion M 2016. The Economics of Poverty: History, Measurement, and Policy Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Rawls J 1971. A Theory of Justice Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Ricardo D 1817. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation London: John Murray
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Rios V 2011. Punished: Policing the Lives of Black and Latino Boys New York: NYU Press
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Rousseau JJ 1754. A Discourse on Inequality New York: Penguin Classics
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Rowntree BS 1902. Poverty: A Study of Town Life London: Macmillan
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Rugh J, Massey D 2010. Racial segregation and the American foreclosure crisis. Am. Sociol. Rev. 75:629–51
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Sakamoto A, Kim C 2010. Is rising earnings inequality associated with increased exploitation? Evidence for US manufacturing industries, 1971–1996. Sociol. Perspect. 53:19–43
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Sampson R 2012. Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Sánchez-Jankowski M 2008. Cracks in the Pavement: Social Change and Resilience in Poor Neighborhoods Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Sassen S 2014. Expulsions: Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Schwartz A 2014. Housing Policy in the United States London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Schwartz S 1994. The fallacy of the ecological fallacy: the potential misuse of a concept and the consequences. Am. J. Public Health 84:819–82
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Sherman L, Strang H 2007. Restorative Justice: The Evidence London: Smith Inst.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Sharkey P 2013. Stuck in Place: Urban Neighborhoods and the End of Progress Toward Racial Equality Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Silver H 1994. Social Exclusion and Social Solidarity: Three Paradigms Geneva: Int. Inst. Labour Stud.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Simon J 2017. The second coming of dignity. The New Criminal Justice Thinking S Dolovich, A Natapoff 275–307 New York: NYU Press
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Smith A 1976 (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Somers M 1993. Citizenship and the place of the public sphere: law, community, and political culture in the transition to democracy. Am. Sociol. Rev. 58:587–620
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Sørensen A 2000. Toward a sounder basis for class analysis. Am. J. Sociol. 105:1523–58
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Spielman S, Folch D, Nagle N 2014. Patterns and causes of uncertainty in the American Community Survey. Appl. Geogr. 46:147–57
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Squires G, O'Connor S 1998. Fringe banking in Milwaukee: the rise of check-cashing businesses and the emergence of a two-tiered banking system. Urban Aff. Rev. 34:126–49
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Stack C 1974. All Our Kin: Strategies for Survival in a Black Community New York: Basic Books
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Stuart F 2016. Down, Out, and Under Arrest: Policing and Everyday Life in Skid Row Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Tilly C 1998. Durable Inequality Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Tolnay S, Beck EM 1992. Racial violence and black migration in the American South, 1910 to 1930. Am. Sociol. Rev. 57:103–16
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Tomaskovic-Devey D, Avent-Holt D 2016. Observing organizational inequality regimes. Res. Sociol. Work 28:187–212
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Waglé U 2007. Multidimensional poverty: an alternative measurement approach for the United States. Soc. Sci. Res. 37:559–80
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Wakefield S, Uggen C 2010. Incarceration and stratification. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36:387–406
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Wakefield S, Wildeman C 2014. Children of the Prison Boom: Mass Incarceration and the Future of American Inequality Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Wazana A 2000. Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: Is a gift ever just a gift. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 283:373–80
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Webb B 1948. Our Partnership London: Longmans
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Webb S, Webb BP 1909. The Break-Up of the Poor Law; Being Parts 1–2 of the Minority Report of the Poor Law Commission London: Read Books
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Western B 2006. Punishment and Inequality in America New York: Russell Sage Found.
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Western B 2015. Lifetimes of violence in a sample of released prisoners. RSF 1:14–30
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Western B 2018. Homeward: Life in the Year after Prison New York: Russell Sage Found.
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Western B, Bloome D, Sosnaud B, Tach L 2016.a Trends in income insecurity among US children, 1984–2010. Demography 53:419–47
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Western B, Braga A, Hureau D, Sirois C 2016.b Study retention as bias reduction in a hard-to-reach population. PNAS 113:5477–85
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Wilson WJ 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Wolf J, de-Shalit A 2007. Disadvantage Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Wright EO 1997. Class Counts: Comparative Studies in Class Analysis Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  112. US Census Bur 2017. Historical Poverty Tables: People and Families—1959–2016 Washington, DC: Bur. Census
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Zarefsky D 2005. President Johnson's War on Poverty: Rhetoric and History Tuscaloosa: Univ. Ala. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Zehr H 2002. The Little Book of Restorative Justice Intercourse, PA: Good Books
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053411
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error