1932

Abstract

The US entrepreneurial finance market has changed dramatically over the last two decades. Entrepreneurs who raise their first round of venture capital retain 30% more equity in their firm and are more likely to control their board of directors. Late-stage start-ups are raising larger amounts of capital in the private markets from a growing pool of traditional and new investors. These private market changes have coincided with a sharp decline in the number of firms going public—and when firms do go public, they are older and have raised more private capital. To understand these facts, we provide a systematic description of the differences between private and public firms. Next, we review several regulatory, technological, and competitive changes affecting both start-ups and investors that help explain how the trade-offs between going public and staying private have changed. We conclude by listing several open research questions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-101821-121115
2022-11-01
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/financial/14/1/annurev-financial-101821-121115.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-101821-121115&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abudy M, Benninga S, Shust E. 2016. The cost of equity for private firms. J. Corp. Finance 37:431–43
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Agarwal V, Barber B, Cheng S, Hameed A, Yasuda A. 2021. Private company valuations by mutual funds SSRN Work. Pap. 3066449
  3. Aghamolla C, Thakor RT. 2022. Do mandatory disclosure requirements for private firms increase the propensity of going public?. J. Account. Res. 60:3755804
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Akhigbe A, Whyte AM. 2015. SEO announcement returns and internal capital market efficiency. J. Corp. Finance 31:271–83
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Anadu K, Kruttli M, McCabe P, Osambela E. 2020. The shift from active to passive investing: Risks to financial stability?. Financ. Anal. J. 76:423–39
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Andonov A, Rauh JD. 2022. The return expectations of public pension funds. Rev. Financ. Stud. 35:83777822
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Aragon GO, Li E, Lindsey LA 2018. Exploration or exploitation? Hedge funds in venture capital SSRN Work. Pap. 3251086
  8. Asker J, Farre-Mensa J, Ljungqvist A. 2015. Corporate investment and stock market listing: A puzzle?. Rev. Financ. Stud. 28:2342–90
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Badertscher BA, Givoly D, Katz SP, Lee H. 2019. Private ownership and the cost of public debt: evidence from the bond market. Manag. Sci. 65:1301–26
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Baker M, Wurgler J. 2013. Behavioral corporate finance: an updated survey. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, Vol. 2 Part A, ed. GM Constantinides, M Harris, RM Stulz 357–424 Kidlington, UK: Elsevier
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bauguess S, Gullapalli R, Ivanov V. 2018. Capital raising in the U.S.: an analysis of the market for unregistered securities offerings, 2009–2017 White Pap., US Sec. Exch. Comm. Washington, DC:
  12. Bernstein S. 2015. Does going public affect innovation?. J. Finance 70:41365–1403
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bernstein S, Giroud X, Townsend RR. 2016. The impact of venture capital monitoring. J. Finance 71:41591–1622
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bernstein S, Lerner J, Schoar A. 2013. The investment strategies of sovereign wealth funds. J. Econ. Perspect. 27:2219–38
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bhattacharya S, Ritter JR. 1983. Innovation and communication: signalling with partial disclosure. Rev. Econ. Stud. 50:2331–46
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Billett MT, Floros IV, Garfinkel JA. 2019. At-the-market offerings. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 54:31263–83
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Black BS, Gilson RJ. 1998. Venture capital and the structure of capital markets: banks versus stock markets. J. Financ. Econ. 47:3243–77
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Board Gov. Fed. Reserve Syst 2021. Market yield on U.S. treasury securities at 10-year constant maturity FRED, Fed. Reserve Bank St. Louis, MO accessed November 2021. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DGS10
  19. Board Gov. Fed. Reserve Syst 2022. Enhanced financial accounts, equity issuance and retirement accessed January 2022. https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/efa/efa-project-equity-issuance-retirement.htm
  20. Bodnaruk A, Kandel E, Massa M, Simonov A. 2008. Shareholder diversification and the decision to go public. Rev. Financ. Stud. 21:62779–824
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Brau JC, Fawcett SE. 2006. Initial public offerings: an analysis of theory and practice. J. Finance 61:1399–436
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Brennan MJ, Torous WN. 1999. Individual decision making and investor welfare. Econ. Notes 28:2119–43
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Brüggemann U, Kaul A, Leuz C, Werner IM. 2018. The twilight zone: OTC regulatory regimes and market quality. Rev. Financ. Stud. 31:3898–942
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Campagna LJ. 2020. Information letter 06-03-2020 US Dept. Labor, Empl. Benefits Sec. Admin. Washington, DC: https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ebsa/about-ebsa/our-activities/resource-center/information-letters/06-03-2020
  25. Celikyurt U, Sevilir M, Shivdasani A. 2010. Going public to acquire? The acquisition motive in IPOs. J. Financ. Econ. 96:3345–63
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Chemmanur TJ, He S, Nandy DK. 2010. The going-public decision and the product market. Rev. Financ. Stud. 23:51855–1908
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Chen J, Ewens M. 2021. Venture capitalists’ access to finance and its impact on startups NBER Work. Pap. 29211
  28. Chernenko S, Lerner J, Zeng Y. 2021. Mutual funds as venture capitalists? Evidence from unicorns. Rev. Financ. Stud. 34:52362–410
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Chod J, Lyandres E. 2011. Strategic IPOs and product market competition. J. Financ. Econ. 100:145–67
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Chung J. 2021. As hedge funds endure rocky year, private-company bets ease the pain. Wall Street Journal, Oct. 23. https://www.wsj.com/articles/as-hedge-funds-endure-rocky-year-private-company-bets-ease-the-pain-11634981400
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Coates JC, Srinivasan S. 2014. SOX after ten years: a multidisciplinary review. Account. Horiz. 28:3627–71
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Cohen S, Fehder DC, Hochberg YV, Murray F. 2019. The design of startup accelerators. Res. Policy 48:71781–97
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Cumming DJ. 2008. Contracts and exits in venture capital finance. Rev. Financ. Stud. 21:51947–82
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Cumming DJ, Johan S, Reardon RS 2021. Governance and success in U.S. securities-based crowdfunding SSRN Work. Pap. 3950966
  35. Da Rin M, Hellmann T, Puri M 2013. A survey of venture capital research. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, Vol. 2 Part A, ed. GM Constantinides, M Harris, RM Stulz 573–648 Kidlington, UK: Elsevier
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Decker RA, Haltiwanger J, Jarmin RS, Miranda J. 2016. Where has all the skewness gone? The decline in high-growth (young) firms in the U.S.. Eur. Econ. Rev. 86:4–23
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Denes MR, Howell ST, Mezzanotti F, Wang X, Xu T 2021. Investor tax credits and entrepreneurship: evidence from US states SSRN Work. Pap. 3596342
  38. Dodhia P. 2020. SEC modernizes the accredited investor definition. Engaging Alternatives, Dec. 11. https://www.eisneramper.com/sec-accredited-investor-ea-1220/
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Doidge C, Kahle KM, Karolyi GA, Stulz RM. 2018. Eclipse of the public corporation or eclipse of the public markets?. J. Appl. Corp. Finance 30:18–16
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Doidge C, Karolyi GA, Stulz RM. 2013. The US left behind? Financial globalization and the rise of IPOs outside the US. J. Financ. Econ. 110:3546–73
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Doidge C, Karolyi GA, Stulz RM. 2017. The US listing gap. J. Financ. Econ. 123:3464–87
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Dow J, Gorton G. 1997. Stock market efficiency and economic efficiency: Is there a connection?. J. Finance 52:31087–1129
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Eckbo BE, Lithell M. 2022. Merger-driven listing dynamics Work. Pap. 752/2021 Eur. Corp. Gov. Inst. Brussels:
  44. Effron SA. 2016. The new Section 4(a)(7): more than a codification of Section “4(a)(1½).”. Mintz Viewpoints Jan. 21. https://www.mintz.com/insights-center/viewpoints/2016-01-21-new-section-4a7-more-codification-section-4a1-12
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Eisfeldt AL, Papanikolaou D. 2013. Organization capital and the cross-section of expected returns. J. Finance 68:41365–1406
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Eur. Comm 2018. Science, research and innovation performance of the EU, 2018. Rep., Eur. Comm. Brussels:
  47. Ewens M, Farre-Mensa J. 2020. The deregulation of the private equity markets and the decline in IPOs. Rev. Financ. Stud. 33:125463–5509
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Ewens M, Malenko N. 2022. Board dynamics over the startup life cycle NBER Work. Pap. 27769
  49. Ewens M, Nanda R, Rhodes-Kropf M. 2018. Cost of experimentation and the evolution of venture capital. J. Financ. Econ. 128:3422–42
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Ewens M, Peters RH, Wang S 2020. Measuring intangible capital with market prices NBER Work. Pap. 25960
  51. Ewens M, Xiao K, Xu T 2021. Regulatory costs of being public: evidence from bunching estimation NBER Work. Pap. 29143
  52. Farre-Mensa J. 2017. The benefits of selective disclosure: evidence from private firms SSRN Work. Pap. 1719204
  53. Gahng M, Ritter JR, Zhang D. 2021. SPACs SSRN Work. Pap. 3775847
  54. Gao X, Ritter JR, Zhu Z. 2013. Where have all the IPOs gone?. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 48:61663–92
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Gompers P. 1996. Grandstanding in the venture capital industry. J. Financ. Econ. 42:1133–56
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Gompers P, Lerner J. 2000. Money chasing deals? The impact of fund inflows on private equity valuations. J. Financ. Econ. 55:2281–325
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Google Inc 2004. Form S-1 registration statement Filed with the US Sec. Exch. Comm., April 29. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1288776/000119312504073639/ds1.htm
  58. Gornall W, Strebulaev IA. 2020. Squaring venture capital valuations with reality. J. Financ. Econ. 135:1120–43
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Gredil O, Liu Y, Sensoy BA. 2021. Diversifying private equity SSRN Work. Pap. 3535677
  60. Gustafson MT, Iliev P. 2017. The effects of removing barriers to equity issuance. J. Financ. Econ. 124:3580–98
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Guzman J, Stern S. 2020. The state of American entrepreneurship: new estimates of the quantity and quality of entrepreneurship for 32 US states, 1988–2014. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 12:4212–43
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Harmetz LS, Berman B 2017. Frequently asked questions about shelf offerings Morrison & Foerster LLP San Francisco: https://media2.mofo.com/documents/faqshelfofferings.pdf
  63. Harris RS, Jenkinson T, Kaplan SN, Stucke R. 2020. Has persistence persisted in private equity? Evidence from buyout and venture capital funds NBER Work. Pap. 28109
  64. Heaton J, Lucas D. 2004. Capital structure, hurdle rates, and portfolio choice—interactions in an entrepreneurial firm Work. Pap., Univ. Chicago
  65. Hermalin B, Weisbach M, eds. 2017. The Handbook of the Economics of Corporate Governance, Vol. 1 Amsterdam: Elsevier
  66. Holmström B, Tirole J. 1993. Market liquidity and performance monitoring. J. Polit. Econ. 101:4678–709
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Hsieh J, Lyandres E, Zhdanov A. 2011. A theory of merger-driven IPOs. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 46:51367–1405
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Huang S, Mao Y, Wang C, Zhou D. 2021. Public market players in the private world: implications for the going-public process. Rev. Financ. Stud. 34:52411–47
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Ibrahim DM. 2012. The new exit in venture capital. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 65:1–47
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Jensen MC, Meckling WH. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financ. Econ. 3:4305–60
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Johnson E, Blankenship M, Smolij B, Niedzwiecki J. 2020. Market trends 2019/20: follow-on offerings. Lexis Practice Advisor Price Note Winston & Strawn LLP https://www.winston.com/images/content/2/0/v2/202821/Market-Trends-201920-Follow-On-Offerings.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Kahle KM, Stulz RM. 2017. Is the US public corporation in trouble?. J. Econ. Perspect. 31:367–88
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Kerr WR, Lerner J, Schoar A. 2014. The consequences of entrepreneurial finance: evidence from angel financings. Rev. Financ. Stud. 27:120–55
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Kiernan P. 2022. SEC pushes for more transparency from private companies. Wall Street Journal, Jan. 10. https://www.wsj.com/articles/sec-pushes-for-more-transparency-from-private-companies-11641752489
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Kim W, Weisbach MS. 2008. Motivations for public equity offers: an international perspective. J. Financ. Econ. 87:2281–307
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Koeplin J, Sarin A, Shapiro AC. 2000. The private company discount. J. Appl. Corp. Finance 12:494–101
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Kovner A, Wei CJ. 2014. The private premium in public bonds SSRN Work. Pap. 2018441
  78. Kwon S, Lowry M, Qian Y. 2020. Mutual fund investments in private firms. J. Financ. Econ. 136:2407–43
    [Google Scholar]
  79. La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. J. Finance 54:2471–517
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Larcker DF, Tayan B, Watts EM. 2018. Cashing it in: private-company exchanges and employee stock sales prior to IPO Work. Pap., Stanford Univ. Stanford, CA:
  81. Lawson KLP. 2006. United States: Pension Protection Act of 2006 allows private equity funds to accept more foreign and governmental plan contributions without becoming subject to ERISA. Mondaq Aug. 31. https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/workforce-management/42508/pension-protection-act-of-2006-allows-private-equity-funds-to-accept-more-foreign-and-governmental-plan-contributions-without-becoming-subject-to-erisa
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Lerner J, Mao J, Schoar A, Zhang NR. 2022. Investing outside the box: evidence from alternative vehicles in private equity. J. Financ. Econ. 143:1359–80
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Lerner J, Nanda R. 2020. Venture capital's role in financing innovation: what we know and how much we still need to learn. J. Econ. Perspect. 34:3237–61
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Lerner J, Schoar A, Wang J. 2008. Secrets of the academy: the drivers of university endowment success. J. Econ. Perspect. 22:3207–22
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Lerner J, Schoar A, Wongsunwai W. 2007. Smart institutions, foolish choices: the limited partner performance puzzle. J. Finance 62:2731–64
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Lindsey LA, Stein LCD. 2020. Angels, entrepreneurship, and employment dynamics: evidence from investor accreditation rules SSRN Work. Pap. 2939994
  87. Loderer C, Waelchli U. 2010. Protecting minority shareholders: listed versus unlisted firms. Financ. Manag. 39:133–57
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Longstaff FA. 1995. How much can marketability affect security values?. J. Finance 50:51767–74
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Lowry M. 2003. Why does IPO volume fluctuate so much?. J. Financ. Econ. 67:13–40
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Lowry M, Michaely R, Volkova E. 2017. Initial public offerings: a synthesis of the literature and directions for future research. Found. Trends Finance 11:3–4154–320
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Maksimovic V, Pichler P. 2001. Technological innovation and initial public offerings. Rev. Financ. Stud. 14:2459–94
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Metrick A, Yasuda A. 2021. Venture Capital and the Finance of Innovation Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons
  93. Morrison & Foerster LLP. 2018. Frequently asked questions about period reporting requirements for U.S. issuers—overview Morrison & Foerster LLP San Francisco: https://media2.mofo.com/documents/faq-periodic-reporting-requirements-for-us-issuers-overview.pdf
  94. NACUBO (Nat. Assoc. Coll. Univ. Bus. Off.) 2021. Public NTSE tables, 2020 NACUBO-TIAA study of endowments (NTSE) results. NACUBO, accessed Nov. 2021. https://www.nacubo.org/Research/2021/Public-NTSE-Tables
  95. Nasdaq 2021. Rulebook—the Nasdaq Stock Market Nasdaq, New York, NY: accessed Nov. 2021. https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/nasdaq/rules
  96. NYSE (New York Stock Exch.) 2021. Listings—company resources NYSE, New York, NY: accessed Nov. 2021. https://www.nyse.com/listings/resources
  97. Obama B. 2012. Remarks by the President at JOBS Act Bill Signing Off. Press Sec. White House, Washington, DC: Apr. 5. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2012/04/05/remarks-president-jobs-act-bill-signing
  98. Officer MS. 2007. The price of corporate liquidity: acquisition discounts for unlisted targets. J. Financ. Econ. 83:3571–98
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Pagano M, Panetta F, Zingales L. 1998. Why do companies go public? An empirical analysis. J. Finance 53:127–64
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Pew Charit. Trusts 2015. The state pensions funding gap: challenges persist Issue Brief, July 14, Pew Charit. Trusts Washington, DC: https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/issue-briefs/2015/07/the-state-pensions-funding-gap-challenges-persist
  101. Pew Charit. Trusts 2021. The state pension funding gap: plans have stabilized in wake of pandemic Issue Brief, Sept. 14 Pew Charit. Trusts Washington, DC: https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/issue-briefs/2021/09/the-state-pension-funding-gap-plans-have-stabilized-in-wake-of-pandemic
  102. Phalippou L. 2020. An inconvenient fact: private equity returns and the billionaire factory. J. Invest. 30:111–39
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Phalippou L, Rauch C, Umber M. 2018. Private equity portfolio company fees. J. Financ. Econ. 129:3559–85
    [Google Scholar]
  104. PitchBook 2021. Venture capital financings data PitchBook, accessed Nov. 2021. https://pitchbook.com
  105. Plumer B, Barclay E, Belluz J, Irfan U. 2018. A simple guide to CRISPR, one of the biggest science stories of the decade. Vox Dec. 27. https://www.vox.com/2018/7/23/17594864/crispr-cas9-gene-editing
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Public Plans Data 2021. Detailed investment data Public Plans Data, accessed Nov. 2021. https://publicplansdata.org/public-plans-database/download-full-data-set/#nav-4
  107. Puri M, Zarutskie R. 2012. On the life cycle dynamics of venture-capital- and non-venture-capital-financed firms. J. Finance 67:62247–93
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Ritter JR. 2011. Equilibrium in the initial public offerings market. Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ. 3:347–74
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Ritter JR. 2021. Initial public offerings: updated statistics Dept. Finance, Univ. Florida Gainesville, FL: accessed Oct. 15, 2021. https://site.warrington.ufl.edu/ritter/files/IPO-Statistics.pdf
  110. Robinson DT, Sensoy BA. 2013. Do private equity fund managers earn their fees? Compensation, ownership, and cash flow performance. Rev. Financ. Stud. 26:112760–97
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Rossi A, Vanacker T, Vismara S. 2021. Equity crowdfunding: new evidence from US and UK markets. Rev. Corp. Finance 1:3–4407–53
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Saunders A, Steffen S. 2011. The costs of being private: evidence from the loan market. Rev. Financ. Stud. 24:124091–122
    [Google Scholar]
  113. SEC (US Secur. Exch. Comm.) 2009. Study of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Section 404 internal control over financial reporting requirements Rep., Off. Econ. Anal. SEC, Washington, DC: https://www.sec.gov/news/studies/2009/sox-404_study.pdf
  114. SEC (US Secur. Exch. Comm.) 2013. Rule 144: selling restricted and control securities Rep., SEC Washington, DC: https://www.sec.gov/reportspubs/investor-publications/investorpubsrule144htm.html
  115. SEC (US Secur. Exch. Comm.) 2021. Exempt offerings Rep., SEC Washington, DC: https://www.sec.gov/smallbusiness/exemptofferings
  116. SEC (US Secur. Exch. Comm.) 2022. Crowdfunding offerings data sets. SEC, Washington, DC: accessed Jan. 2022. https://www.sec.gov/dera/data/crowdfunding-offerings-data-sets
  117. Shane S. 2012. The importance of angel investing in financing the growth of entrepreneurial ventures. Q. J. Finance 2:21250009
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Shleifer A, Vishny RW. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. J. Finance 52:2737–83
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Smith M, Zidar OM, Zwick E. 2021. Top wealth in America: new estimates and implications for taxing the rich NBER Work. Pap. 29374
  120. Stein JC. 1989. Efficient capital markets, inefficient firms: a model of myopic corporate behavior. Q. J. Econ. 104:4655–69
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Stein JC. 2003. Agency, information and corporate investment. Handb. Econ. Finance 1:111–65
    [Google Scholar]
  122. Stulz RM. 2020. Public versus private equity. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 36:2275–90
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Sweet CA. 2016. The FAST Act, new Section 4(a)(7), and Section 4(a)(1½). LawFlash, Morgan Lewis, Jan. 4. https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2016/01/the-fast-act-new-sections
    [Google Scholar]
  124. VCExperts 2014. Certificate of incorporation data Updated June 2014, accessed Aug. 2014. https://www.vcexperts.com
  125. VentureSource 2020. Venture capital database on financing and investors. Dow Jones VentureSource New York, NY: accessed May 2020
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-101821-121115
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-101821-121115
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error