1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Financial Economics
  4. Volume 15, 2023
  5. Article

Annual Review of Financial Economics

Volume 15, 2023

Climate Stress Testing

Abstract

We explore the design of climate stress tests to assess and manage macroprudential risks from climate change in the financial sector. We review the climate stress scenarios currently employed by regulators, highlighting the need to () consider many transition risks as dynamic policy choices, () better understand and incorporate feedback loops between climate change and the economy, and () further explore compound risk scenarios in which climate risks co-occur with other risks. We discuss how the process of mapping climate stress scenarios into financial firm outcomes can incorporate existing evidence on the effects of various climate-related risks on credit and market outcomes. We argue that more research is required to () identify channels through which plausible scenarios can lead to meaningful short-run impact on credit risks given typical bank loan maturities, () incorporate bank-lending responses to climate risks, () assess the adequacy of climate risk pricing in financial markets, and () better understand how market participants form climate risk expectations and how that affects financial stability. Finally, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using market-based climate stress tests that can be conducted with publicly available data to complement existing stress-testing frameworks.

Keyword(s): climate risk, financial stability, JEL G1, JEL G2, JEL Q54, systemic risk
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-110921-101555
2023-11-01
2024-05-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/financial/15/1/annurev-financial-110921-101555.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-110921-101555&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Acharya VV, Engle R, Pastore S, Stroebel J. 2023. Climate transition risk and energy prices. Work. Pap. NYU Stern Sch. Bus. New York:
  2. Acharya VV, Engle R, Pierret D. 2014. Testing macroprudential stress tests: the risk of regulatory risk weights. J. Monet. Econ. 65:36–53
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Acharya VV, Engle R, Wang O. 2023. Incentives to decarbonize and innovate: the role of net zero commitments. Work. Pap. NYU Stern Sch. Bus. New York:
  4. Acharya VV, Johnson T, Sundaresan S, Tomunen T. 2022. Is physical climate risk priced? Evidence from regional variation in exposure to heat stress NBER Work. Pap. 30445
  5. ACPR (Aut. Contrôle Prudent. Résolut.) 2021. A first assessment of financial risks stemming from climate change: the main results of the 2020 climate pilot exercise. Rep. ACPR Banque de France, Paris: https://c2e2.unepccc.org/kmsbject/a-first-assessment-of-financial-risks-stemming-from-climate-change-results-of-the-2020-climate-pilot-exercise
  6. Addoum JM, Ng DT, Ortiz-Bobea A. 2020. Temperature shocks and establishment sales. Rev. Financ. Stud. 33:31331–66
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Addoum JM, Ng DT, Ortiz-Bobea A. 2023. Temperature shocks and industry earnings news. J. Financ. Econ. 150:11–45
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Alekseev G, Giglio S, Maingi Q, Selgrad J, Stroebel J. 2022. A quantity-based approach to constructing climate risk hedge portfolios NBER Work. Pap. 30703
  9. Annicchiarico B, Carattini S, Fischer C, Heutel G. 2021. Business cycles and environmental policy: literature review and policy implications NBER Work. Pap. 29032
  10. APRA (Aust. Prudent. Regul. Auth.) 2021. Climate vulnerability assessment Inf. Pap. APRA Sydney: https://www.apra.gov.au/climate-vulnerability-assessment
  11. Auh JK, Choi J, Deryugina T, Park T. 2022. Natural disasters and municipal bonds NBER Work. Pap. 30280
  12. Bailey A. 2020. The time to push ahead on tackling climate change Talk presented at Corporation of London Green Horizon Summit, Novemb. 9. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/speech/2020/andrew-bailey-speech-corporation-of-london-green-horizon-summit
  13. Bailey M, Cao R, Kuchler T, Stroebel J. 2018a. The economic effects of social networks: evidence from the housing market. J. Political Econ. 126:62224–76
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Bailey M, Cao R, Kuchler T, Stroebel J, Wong A. 2018b. Social connectedness: measurement, determinants, and effects. J. Econ. Perspect. 32:3259–80
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Bailey M, Dávila E, Kuchler T, Stroebel J. 2019. House price beliefs and mortgage leverage choice. Rev. Econ. Stud. 86:62403–52
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Bailey M, Johnston DM, Koenen M, Kuchler T, Russel D, Stroebel J. 2020. Social networks shape beliefs and behavior: evidence from social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic NBER Work. Pap. 28234
  17. Bakkensen LA, Barrage L. 2022. Going underwater? Flood risk belief heterogeneity and coastal home price dynamics. Rev. Financ. Stud. 35:83666–709
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Baldauf M, Garlappi L, Yannelis C. 2020. Does climate change affect real estate prices? Only if you believe in it. Rev. Financ. Stud. 33:31256–95
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Bank Engl 2021. Key elements of the 2021 Biennial Exploratory Scenario: financial risks from climate change. Rep. Bank Engl., London: https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/stress-testing/2021/key-elements-2021-biennial-exploratory-scenario-financial-risks-climate-change
  20. Bank Engl 2022. Results of the 2021 Climate Biennial Exploratory Scenario (CBES) Results Rep. Bank Engl. London: https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/stress-testing/2022/results-of-the-2021-climate-biennial-exploratory-scenario
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Bansal R, Kiku D, Ochoa M. 2021. Climate change risk. Work. Pap. Duke Univ. Durham, NC:
  22. Barro RJ. 2015. Environmental protection, rare disasters and discount rates. Economica 82:3251–23
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Battiston S, Mandel A, Monasterolo I, Schütze F, Visentin G. 2017. A climate stress-test of the financial system. Nat. Clim. Change 7:4283–88
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Baudino P, Svoronos JP. 2021. Stress-testing banks for climate change—a comparison of practices. Financ. Stabil. Inst. Insights 34 Bank Int. Settl. Basel, Switz.:
  25. Benincasa E, Kabas G, Ongena S. 2022. “There is no planet B,” but for banks there are “countries B to Z”: domestic climate policy and cross-border bank lending. Res. Pap. 22-28 Swiss Finance Inst. Zurich:
  26. Berg T, Saunders A, Steffen S, Streitz D. 2017. Mind the gap: the difference between U.S. and European loan rates. Rev. Financ. Stud. 30:3948–87
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Bernstein A, Billings SB, Gustafson MT, Lewis R. 2022. Partisan residential sorting on climate change risk. J. Financ. Econ. 146:3989–1015
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Bernstein A, Gustafson MT, Lewis R. 2019. Disaster on the horizon: the price effect of sea level rise. J. Financ. Econ. 134:2253–72
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Billings MB, Ryan SG, Yan H. 2022. Climate risk, population migration, and banks' lending and deposit-taking activities. Work. Pap. NYU Stern Sch. Bus. New York:
  30. BIS (Bank Int. Settl.) 2020. Climate-related financial risks: a survey on current initiatives. Rep. BIS Basel, Switz.: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d502.htm
  31. BIS (Bank Int. Settl.) 2021. Climate-related risk drivers and their transmission channels. Rep. BIS Basel, Switz.: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d517.htm
  32. Blickle K, Fleckenstein Q, Hillenbrand S, Saunders A. 2020. The myth of the lead arranger's share Staff Rep. 922 Fed. Reserve Bank N. Y.
  33. Blickle K, Hamerling SN, Morgan DP. 2021. How bad are weather disasters for banks? Staff Rep. 990 Fed. Reserve Bank N. Y.
  34. Blickle K, Parlatore C, Saunders A. 2021. Specialization in banking Staff Rep. 967 Fed. Reserve Bank N. Y.
  35. Blickle K, Santos JA. 2022. Unintended consequences of “mandatory” flood insurance Staff Rep. 1012 Fed. Reserve Bank N. Y.
  36. Board Gov. Fed. Reserve Syst 2023. Pilot climate scenario analysis exercise. Particip. Instr. Board Gov. Fed. Reserve Syst. New York: https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/csa-instructions-20230117.pdf
  37. Bolton P, Despres M, Pereira Da Silva LA, Samama F, Svartzman R 2020. The green swan: central banking and financial stability in the age of climate change. Rep. Bank Int. Settl. Basel, Switz.:
  38. Bolton P, Kacperczyk MT. 2023. Firm commitments NBER Work. Pap. 31244
  39. Borio C, Drehmann M, Tsatsaronis K. 2014. Stress-testing macro stress testing: Does it live up to expectations?. J. Financ. Stabil. 12:3–15
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Boustan LP, Kahn ME, Rhode PW, Yanguas ML. 2020. The effect of natural disasters on economic activity in US counties: a century of data. J. Urban Econ. 118:103257
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Brainard L. 2021. Building climate scenario analysis on the foundations of economic research Talk presented at 2021 Federal Reserve Stress Testing Research Conference, online, Oct. 7
  42. Brei M, Mohan P, Strobl E. 2019. The impact of natural disasters on the banking sector: evidence from hurricane strikes in the Caribbean. Q. Rev. Econ. Finance 72:232–39
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Brunetti C, Caramichael J, Crosignani M, Dennis B, Kotta G et al. 2022. Climate-related financial stability risks for the United States: methods and applications. Finance Econ. Discuss. Ser. 2022-043 Board Gov. Fed. Reserve Syst. Washington, DC:
  44. Carattini S, Heutel G, Melkadze G. 2021. Climate policy, financial frictions, and transition risk NBER Work. Pap. 28525
  45. Carattini S, Kim G, Melkadze G, Pommeret A. 2022. Carbon taxes and tariffs, financial frictions, and international spillovers. Work. Pap. Georgia State Univ. Athens:
  46. Carattini S, Sen S. 2019. Carbon taxes and stranded assets: evidence from Washington State. Work. Pap. 7785 CESifo Munich, Ger.:
  47. Carney M. 2015. Breaking the tragedy of the horizon: climate change and financial stability Talk presented at Lloyd's of London, Sept. 29. https://www.bis.org/review/r151009a.pdf
  48. Cartellier F. 2022. Climate stress testing, an answer to the challenge of assessing climate-related risks to the financial system? Work. Pap. Inst. Polytech. Paris:
  49. Chava S. 2014. Environmental externalities and cost of capital. Manag. Sci. 60:92223–47
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Chavaz M. 2016. Dis-integrating credit markets: diversification, securitization, and lending in a recovery. Work. Pap. 617 Bank Engl. London:
  51. Chodorow-Reich G, Darmouni O, Luck S, Plosser M. 2022. Bank liquidity provision across the firm size distribution. J. Financ. Econ. 144:3908–32
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Choi D, Gao Z, Jiang W. 2020. Attention to global warming. Rev. Financ. Stud. 33:31112–45
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Correa R, He A, Herpfer C, Lel U. 2020. The rising tide lifts some interest rates: climate change, natural disasters and loan pricing. Work. Pap. 889/2023 Eur. Corp. Gov. Inst. Brussels:
  54. Cortès KR, Strahan PE. 2017. Tracing out capital flows: how financially integrated banks respond to natural disasters. J. Financ. Econ. 125:1182–99
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Cuculiza C, Kumar A, Xin W, Zhang C. 2021. Climate change, analyst forecasts, and market behavior. Work. Pap. Univ. Miami Coral Gables, FL:
  56. Dafermos Y, Nikolaidi M. 2021. How can green differentiated capital requirements affect climate risks? A dynamic macrofinancial analysis. J. Financ. Stabil. 54:100871
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Das A, Majilla T, Saurav S. 2023. Natural disasters, interest rates dynamics, and economic activities. Work. Pap. Indian Inst. Manag. Ahmedabad:
  58. de Boyrie ME, Pavlova I. 2020. Analysing the link between environmental performance and sovereign credit risk. Appl. Econ. 52:545949–66
     [Google Scholar]
  59. De Marco F, Nicola L 2023. Climate, amenities and banking: El Niño in the US. Press Discuss. Pap. 17909 Cent. Econ. Policy Res. London:
  60. Delis MD, De Greiff K, Ongena S. 2019. Being stranded with fossil fuel reserves? Climate policy risk and the pricing of bank loans. Res. Pap. 18-10 Swiss Finance Inst. Zurich:
  61. Di Marco M, Baker ML, Daszak P, De Barro P, Eskew EA et al. 2020. Sustainable development must account for pandemic risk. PNAS 117:83888–92
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Diluiso F, Annicchiarico B, Kalkuhl M, Minx JC. 2021. Climate actions and macro-financial stability: the role of central banks. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 110:102548
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Dlugosz J, Gam YK, Gopalan R, Skrastins J. 2022. Decision-making delegation in banks. Work. Pap. Board Gov. Fed. Reserve Syst. Washington, DC:
  64. Dunz N, Emambakhsh T, Hennig T, Kaijser M, Kouratzoglou C, Salleo C. 2021. ECB's economy-wide climate stress test. Occas. Pap. 2021/281 Eur. Cent. Bank Frankfurt, Ger.:
  65. Dunz N, Naqvi A, Monasterolo I. 2021. Climate sentiments, transition risk, and financial stability in a stock-flow consistent model. J. Financ. Stabil. 54:100872
     [Google Scholar]
  66. ECB (Eur. Cent. Bank) 2022a. 2022 climate risk stress test Rep. ECB Frankfurt, Ger.: https://www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/ecb/pub/pdf/ssm.climate_stress_testeport.20220708 2e3cc0999f.en.pdf
  67. ECB (Eur. Cent. Bank) 2022b. ECB report on good practices for climate stress testing Rep. ECB Frankfurt, Ger.: https://www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/ecb/pub/pdf/ssm.202212_ECBreport_on_good_practices_for_CST 539227e0c1.en.pdf
  68. ECB (Eur. Cent. Bank) 2022c. ECB takes further steps to incorporate climate change into its monetary policy operations Press Release ECB Frankfurt, Ger.: July 4
  69. Engle R. 2002. Dynamic conditional correlation: a simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 20:3339–50
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Engle R. 2009. Anticipating Correlations: A New Paradigm for Risk Management Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  71. Engle R, Giglio S, Kelly B, Lee H, Stroebel J. 2020. Hedging climate change news. Rev. Financ. Stud. 33:31184–216
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Ens E, Johnston CMT. 2020. Scenario analysis and the economic and financial risks from climate change Staff Discuss. Pap. 2020-3 Bank Can. Ottawa:
  73. Faccini R, Matin R, Skiadopoulos GS. 2022. Dissecting climate risks: Are they reflected in stock prices? Work. Pap. Dan. Nationalbank Copenhagen:
  74. Frahm G, Junker M, Schmidt R. 2005. Estimating the tail-dependence coefficient: properties and pitfalls. Insur. Math. Econ. 37:180–100
     [Google Scholar]
  75. FSB (Financ. Stabil. Board), NGFS (Netw. Green. Financ. Syst.) 2022. Climate scenario analysis by jurisdictions: initial findings and lessons Rep. FSB Basel, Switz.: https://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/P151122.pdf
  76. FSOC (Financ. Stabil. Overs. Counc.) 2021. Report on climate-related financial risk: 2021 Rep. FSOC Washington, DC: https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/261/FSOC-Climate-Report.pdf
  77. Ganong P, Noel P. 2023. Why do borrowers default on mortgages?. Q. J. Econ. 138:21001–65
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Ge S, Lam A, Lewis R. 2022. The costs of hedging disaster risk and home prices: evidence from flood insurance. Work. Pap. NYU Stern Sch. Bus. New York:
  79. Giglio S, Kelly B, Stroebel J. 2021. Climate finance. Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ. 13:15–36
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Giglio S, Kuchler T, Stroebel J, Zeng X. 2023a. Biodiversity risk NBER Work. Pap. 31137
  81. Giglio S, Maggiori M, Rao K, Stroebel J, Weber A. 2021. Climate change and long-run discount rates: evidence from real estate. Rev. Financ. Stud. 34:83527–71
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Giglio S, Maggiori M, Stroebel J, Tan Z, Utkus S, Xu X. 2023b. Four facts about ESG beliefs and investor portfolios NBER Work. Pap. 31114
  83. Goldsmith-Pinkham P, Gustafson MT, Lewis RC, Schwert M. 2023. Sea-level rise exposure and municipal bond yields. Rev. Financ. Stud. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhad041
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Gostlow G. 2021. Pricing physical climate risk in the cross-section of returns. Work. Pap. London Sch. Econ. Political Sci. London:
  85. Goulder L, Hafstead M. 2018. Confronting the Climate Challenge: U.S. Policy Options New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  86. Grippa P, Schmittmann J, Suntheim F. 2019. Climate change and financial risk. Finance Dev 56:26–29
     [Google Scholar]
  87. He Z, Xiong W. 2012. Rollover risk and credit risk. J. Finance 67:2391–430
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Hong H, Karolyi GA, Scheinkman JA. 2020. Climate finance. Rev. Financ. Stud. 33:31011–23
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Hong Kong Monet. Auth 2021. Pilot banking sector climate risk stress test Rep. Hong Kong Monet. Auth. Hong Kong: https://www.hkma.gov.hk/media/eng/doc/key-functions/banking-stability/Pilot_banking_sector_climate_risk_stress_test.pdf
  90. Huynh TD, Xia Y. 2021. Climate change news risk and corporate bond returns. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 56:61985–2009
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Int. Monet. Fund 2022. Staff guidance note on the sovereign risk and debt sustainability framework for market access countries. Policy Pap. 2022/039 Int. Monet. Fund Washington, DC:
  92. IPCC (Intergov. Panel Clim. Change) 2019. Special report on climate change and land Spec. Rep. IPCC Geneva: https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl
  93. Islam E, Singh M. 2022. Information on hot stuff: Do lenders pay attention to climate risk? Work. Pap. Monash Univ. Melbourne, Aust.:
  94. Ivanov I, Kruttli MS, Watugala SW. 2022. Banking on carbon: corporate lending and cap-and-trade policy. Work. Pap. Fed. Reserve Bank Chicago
  95. Javadi S, Masum AA. 2021. The impact of climate change on the cost of bank loans. J. Corp. Finance 69:102019
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Joe H. 1997. Multivariate Models and Multivariate Dependence Concepts Boca Raton, FL: CRC
  97. Jorgenson DW, Goettle RJ, Ho MS, Wilcoxen PJ. 2013. Double Dividend: Environmental Taxes and Fiscal Reform in the United States Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  98. Jorgenson DW, Goettle RJ, Ho MS, Wilcoxen PJ. 2018. The welfare consequences of taxing carbon. Clim. Change Econ 9:1840013
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Jung H, Engle R, Berner R. 2021. CRISK: measuring the climate risk exposure of the financial system. Staff Rep. 977 Fed. Reserve Bank N. Y.
  100. Jung H, Engle R, Ge S, Zeng X. 2023. Measuring the climate risk exposure of insurers. Staff Rep. 1066 Fed. Reserve Bank N. Y.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Jung H, Santos JA, Seltzer L. 2023. U.S. banks' exposures to climate transition risks Staff Rep. 1058 Fed. Reserve Bank N. Y.
  102. Kacperczyk MT, Peydró JL. 2022. Carbon emissions and the bank-lending channel. Work. Pap. Imperial Coll. London
  103. Känzig DR. 2021. The macroeconomic effects of oil supply news: evidence from OPEC announcements. Am. Econ. Rev. 111:41092–125
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Khwaja AI, Mian A. 2008. Tracing the impact of bank liquidity shocks: evidence from an emerging market. Am. Econ. Rev. 98:41413–42
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Krueger P, Sautner Z, Starks LT. 2020. The importance of climate risks for institutional investors. Rev. Financ. Stud. 33:31067–111
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Kuchler T, Stroebel J. 2021. Social finance. Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ. 13:37–55
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Kundu S, Park S, Vats N. 2021. The geography of bank deposits and the origins of aggregate fluctuations. Work. Pap. UCLA Anderson Sch. Manag. Los Angeles:
  108. Kuroda H. 2021. The Bank of Japan's strategy on climate change. Rep. Bank Jpn. Tokyo: https://www.boj.or.jp/en/about/press/koen_2021/data/ko210727a.pdf
  109. Laeven L, Popov AA. 2022. Carbon taxes and the geography of fossil lending. Work. Pap. 2762 Eur. Cent. Bank Frankfurt, Ger.:
  110. Lamperti F, Bosetti V, Roventini A, Tavoni M, Treibich T. 2021. Three green financial policies to address climate risks. J. Financ. Stabil. 54:100875
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Lane PR. 2019. Climate change and the Irish financial system Econ. Lett. 2019-1 Cent. Bank Irel. Dublin:
  112. Litterman B. 2023. Selling stranded assets: profit, protection, and prosperity. Fact Sheet Intent. Endow. Netw. Andover, MA.: https://www.intentionalendowments.org/selling_stranded_assets_profit_protection_and_prosperity
  113. Litterman B, Martinez-Diaz L, Keenan JM, Moch S, Gillers D, Behnam R. 2021. Managing climate risk in the U.S. financial system Rep. US Commod. Futur. Trad. Comm. Washington, DC:
  114. Maher D. 2022. Testimony on exploring financial risks on banking posed by climate change Testimony presented to New York State Senate Committees on Banks, Finance, and Environmental Conservation, online, March 1. https://www.newyorkfed.org/newsevents/speeches/2022/mah220301
  115. McNeil AJ, Frey R, Embrechts P. 2015. Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. , Revis. ed..
  116. Morris S, Shin HS. 2016. Illiquidity component of credit risk. Int. Econ. Rev. 57:41135–48
     [Google Scholar]
  117. NGFS (Netw. Green. Financ. Syst.) 2019. Origin and purpose Fact Sheet NGFS Paris: https://www.ngfs.net/en/about-us/governance/origin-and-purpose
  118. NGFS (Netw. Green. Financ. Syst.) 2020. NGFS climate scenarios for central banks and supervisors Rep. NGFS Paris: https://www.ngfs.net/sites/default/files/medias/documents/820184_ngfs_scenarios_final_version_v6_0.pdf
  119. NGFS (Netw. Green. Financ. Syst.) 2021. NGFS climate scenarios for central banks and supervisors Rep. NGFS Paris: https://www.ngfs.net/en/ngfs-climate-scenarios-central-banks-and-supervisors-june-2021
  120. NGFS (Netw. Green. Financ. Syst.) 2022. Running the NGFS scenarios in G-cubed: a tale of two modelling frameworks Occas. Pap. NGFS Paris: https://www.ngfs.net/en/running-ngfs-scenarios-g-cubed-tale-two-modelling-frameworks
  121. Nguyen DD, Ongena S, Qi S, Sila V. 2022. Climate change risk and the cost of mortgage credit. Rev. Finance 26:61509–49
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Nordhaus WD, Boyer J. 2000. Warming the World Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  123. Oehmke M, Opp M. 2021. Green capital requirements. Work. Pap. London Sch. Econ. Political Sci. London:
  124. Off. Sci. Technol. Policy 2022. Climate and energy implications of crypto-assets Rep. White House Washington, DC.: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/09-2022-Crypto-Assets-and-Climate-Report.pdf
  125. Painter M. 2020. An inconvenient cost: the effects of climate change on municipal bonds. J. Financ. Econ. 135:2468–82
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Pankratz N, Schiller C. 2021. Climate change and adaptation in global supply-chain networks Finance Econ. Discuss. Ser. 2022-056 Board Gov. Fed. Reserve Syst. Washington, DC:
  127. Pástor L, Stambaugh RF, Taylor LA. 2021. Sustainable investing in equilibrium. J. Financ. Econ. 142:2550–71
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Pástor L, Stambaugh RF, Taylor LA. 2022. Dissecting green returns. J. Financ. Econ. 146:2403–24
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Powell JH. 2023. Panel on “Central Bank Independence and the Mandate—Evolving Views.” Talk presented at Symposium on Central Bank Independence Sveriges Riksbank Stockholm: Jan. 10
  130. Ramelli S, Wagner AF, Zeckhauser RJ, Ziegler A. 2021. Investor rewards to climate responsibility: stock-price responses to the opposite shocks of the 2016 and 2020 US elections. Rev. Corp. Finance Stud. 10:4748–87
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Reinders HJ, Schoenmaker D, van Dijk M. 2023a. A finance approach to climate stress testing. J. Int. Money Finance 131:102797
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Reinders HJ, Schoenmaker D, van Dijk MA. 2023b. Climate risk stress testing: a conceptual review. Work. Pap. Rotterdam Sch. Manag. Rotterdam, Neth.:
  133. Roncoroni A, Battiston S, Escobar-Farfán LOL, Martinez-Jaramillo S. 2021. Climate risk and financial stability in the network of banks and investment funds. J. Financ. Stabil. 54:100870
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Roth Tran B, Wilson DJ 2020. The local economic impact of natural disasters. Work. Pap. 2020-34 Fed. Reserve Bank San Francisco
  135. Seltzer LH, Starks L, Zhu Q. 2022. Climate regulatory risk and corporate bonds NBER Work. Pap. 29994
  136. Sibuya M. 1960. Bivariate extreme statistics, I. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 11:3195–210
     [Google Scholar]
  137. Steindl FG, Weinrobe MD. 1983. Natural hazards and deposit behavior at financial institutions: a note. J. Bank. Finance 7:1111–18
     [Google Scholar]
  138. Stroebel J, Wurgler J. 2021. What do you think about climate finance?. J. Financ. Econ. 142:2487–98
     [Google Scholar]
  139. van Benthem AA, Crooks E, Giglio S, Schwob E, Stroebel J. 2022. The effect of climate risks on the interactions between financial markets and energy companies. Nat. Energy 7:8690–97
     [Google Scholar]
  140. van Dijk MA. 2020. Assessing climate risk for investment portfolios: an overview for Dutch pension funds. Work. Pap. Erasmus Univ. Rotterdam, Neth.:
  141. Vermeulen R, Schets E, Lohuis M, Kölbl B, Jansen DJ, Heeringa W. 2021. The heat is on: a framework for measuring financial stress under disruptive energy transition scenarios. Ecol. Econ. 190:107205
     [Google Scholar]
  142. Weitzman ML. 2012. Rare disasters, tail-hedged investments, and risk-adjusted discount rates NBER Work. Pap. 18496
  143. Weitzman ML. 2014. Fat tails and the social cost of carbon. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:5544–46
     [Google Scholar]
  144. Woods S. 2022. Climate capital Talk presented at Global Association of Risk Professionals Webcast, online, May 24. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/speech/2022/may/sam-woods-speech-on-the-results-of-the-climate-bes-exercise-on-financial-risks-from-climate-change
  145. Yellen JL. 2021. Finance Committee questions for the record. Hearing on the nomination of Dr. Janet Yellen: responses by Dr. Yellen. Transcr. US Sen. Comm. Finance Washington, DC: Jan. 21. https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Dr%20Janet%20Yellen%20Senate%20Finance%20Committee%20QFRs%2001%2021%202021.pdf
  146. Yellen JL. 2023. Remarks by Secretary of the Treasury Janet L. Yellen at the First Meeting of the FSOC Climate-Related Financial Risk Advisory Committee. Press Release US Treas. Washington, DC: March 7. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1325
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-110921-101555
Loading
Climate Stress Testing
Annual Review of Financial Economics 15, 291 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-110921-101555
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-110921-101555
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-110921-101555
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error