1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Psychology
  4. Volume 75, 2024
  5. Article

Annual Review of Psychology

Volume 75, 2024

A Systematic Review of Implementation Research on Determinants and Strategies of Effective HIV Interventions for Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States

Abstract

Men who have sex with men (MSM) are disproportionately affected by HIV, accounting for two-thirds of HIV cases in the United States despite representing ∼5% of the adult population. Delivery and use of existing and highly effective HIV prevention and treatment strategies remain suboptimal among MSM. To summarize the state of the science, we systematically review implementation determinants and strategies of HIV-related health interventions using implementation science frameworks. Research on implementation barriers has focused predominantly on characteristics of individual recipients (e.g., ethnicity, age, drug use) and less so on deliverers (e.g., nurses, physicians), with little focus on system-level factors. Similarly, most strategies target recipients to influence their uptake and adherence, rather than improving and supporting implementation systems. HIV implementation research is burgeoning; future research is needed to broaden the examination of barriers at the provider and system levels, as well as expand knowledge on how to match strategies to barriers—particularly to address stigma. Collaboration and coordination among federal, state, and local public health agencies; community-based organizations; health care providers; and scientists are important for successful implementation of HIV-related health innovations.

Keyword(s): HIV, HIV testing, implementation science, linkage-to-care, men who have sex with men, preexposure prophylaxis
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-032620-035725
2024-01-18
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/psych/75/1/annurev-psych-032620-035725.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-032620-035725&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Aarons GA, Sklar M, Mustanski B, Benbow N, Brown CH. 2017. “Scaling-out” evidence-based interventions to new populations or new health care delivery systems. Implement. Sci. 12:111
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alonzo J, Mann L, Tanner AE, Sun CJ, Painter TM et al. 2016. Reducing HIV risk among Hispanic/Latino men who have sex with men: qualitative analysis of behavior change intentions by participants in a small-group intervention. J. AIDS Clin. Res. 7:572
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Amico KR, Miller J, Balthazar C, Serrano PA, Brothers J et al. 2019. Integrated Next Step Counseling (iNSC) for sexual health and PrEP use among young men who have sex with men: implementation and observations from ATN110/113. AIDS Behav. 23:1812–23
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Avoundjian T, Stewart J, Peyton D, Lewis C, Johnson K et al. 2019. Integrating human immunodeficiency virus testing into syphilis partner services in Mississippi to improve human immunodeficiency virus case finding. Sex. Transm. Dis. 46:240–45
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Babel RA, Wang P, Alessi EJ, Raymond HF, Wei C. 2021. Stigma, HIV risk, and access to HIV prevention and treatment services among men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States: a scoping review. AIDS Behav. 25:3574–604
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Balaji AB, An Q, Smith JC, Newcomb ME, Mustanski B et al. 2018. High human immunodeficiency virus incidence and prevalence and associated factors among adolescent sexual minority males—3 cities, 2015. Clin. Infect. Dis. 66:936–44
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bandura A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
  8. Baumann AA, Cabassa LJ. 2020. Reframing implementation science to address inequities in healthcare delivery. BMC Health Serv. Res. 20:190
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Baumann AA, Woodward EN, Singh RS, Adsul P, Shelton RC. 2022. Assessing researchers’ capabilities, opportunities, and motivation to conduct equity-oriented dissemination and implementation research: an exploratory cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 22:731
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Baumeister RF, Heatherton TF. 1996. Self-regulation failure: an overview. Psychol. Inq. 7:1–15
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Blank S, Gallagher K, Washburn K, Rogers M. 2005. Reaching out to boys at bars: utilizing community partnerships to employ a wellness strategy for syphilis control among men who have sex with men in New York City. Sex. Transm. Dis. 32:Suppl.65–72
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Brant AR, Dhillon P, Hull S, Coleman M, Ye PP, Lotke PS et al. 2020. Integrating HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis into family planning care: a RE-AIM framework evaluation. AIDS Patient Care STDs 34:259–66
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK. 2017. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  14. Brownson RC, Kumanyika SK, Kreuter MW, Haire-Joshu D. 2021. Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity. Implement. Sci. 16:28
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Burns PA, Omondi AA, Monger M, Ward L, Washington R et al. 2022. Meet me where I am: an evaluation of HIV patient navigation intervention to increase update of PrEP among black men who have sex with men in the Deep South. J. Racial Ethn. Health Dispar. 9:103–16
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Cahill S, Taylor SW, Elsesser SA, Mena L, Hickson D, Mayer KH. 2017. Stigma, medical mistrust, and perceived racism may affect PrEP awareness and uptake in black compared to white gay and bisexual men in Jackson, Mississippi and Boston, Massachusetts. AIDS Care 29:1351–58
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Catania JA, Dolcini MM, Harper G, Fortenberry D, Singh RR et al. 2020. Oral HIV self-implemented testing: performance fidelity among African American MSM. AIDS Behav. 24:395–403
     [Google Scholar]
  18. CDC (Cent. Dis. Control Prev.). 1999. U.S. HIV and AIDS cases reported through December 1999. HIV Surveill. Suppl. Rep. 11:2 https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-surveillance-report-1999-vol-11-2.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  19. CDC (Cent. Dis. Control Prev.). 2007. Cases of HIV infection and AIDS in the United States and dependent areas, 2007. HIV Surveill. Suppl. Rep. 19: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-surveillance-report-2007-vol-19.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  20. CDC (Cent. Dis. Control Prev.). 2021a. Estimated annual number of HIV infections—United States, 1981–2019. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 70:801–6
     [Google Scholar]
  21. CDC (Cent. Dis. Control Prev.). 2021b. Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States, 2015–2019. HIV Surveill. Suppl. Rep. 26:1 https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-surveillance-supplemental-report-vol-26-1.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  22. CDC (Cent. Dis. Control Prev.). 2022. Monitoring selected national HIV prevention and care objectives by using HIV surveillance data—United States and 6 dependent areas, 2020. HIV Surveill. Rep. 33: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/121127/cdc_121127_DS1.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Chai PR, Goodman G, Bustamante M, Mendez L, Mohamed Y et al. 2021. Design and delivery of real-time adherence data to men who have sex with men using antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis via an ingestible electronic sensor. AIDS Behav. 25:1661–74
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Chen A, Dowdy DW. 2014. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in men who have sex with men: risk calculators for real-world decision-making. PLOS ONE 9:e108742
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Chou R, Evans C, Hoverman A, Sun C, Dana T et al. 2019. Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection: evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 321:2214–30
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Clark R, Anderson NB, Clark VR, Williams DR. 1999. Racism as a stressor for African Americans: a biopsychosocial model. Am. Psychol. 54:805–16
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Clement ME, Johnston BE, Eagle C, Taylor D, Rosengren AL et al. 2019. Advancing the HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis continuum: a collaboration between a public health department and a federally qualified health center in the southern United States. AIDS Patient Care STDs 33:366–71
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, Gamble T, Hosseinipour MC et al. 2016. Antiretroviral therapy for the prevention of HIV-1 transmission. N. Engl. J. Med. 375:830–39
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Colson PW, Franks J, Wu Y, Winterhalter FS, Knox J et al. 2020. Adherence to pre-exposure prophylaxis in black men who have sex with men and transgender women in a community setting in Harlem, NY. AIDS Behav. 24:3436–55
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Crepaz N, Hess KL, Purcell DW, Hall HI. 2019. Estimating national rates of HIV infection among MSM, persons who inject drugs, and heterosexuals in the United States. AIDS 33:701–8
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Curran GM, Landes SJ, McBain SA, Pyne JM, Smith JD et al. 2022. Reflections on 10 years of effectiveness–implementation hybrid studies. Front. Health Serv. 2:1053496
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Dale SK, Ayala G, Logie CH, Bowleg L. 2022. Addressing HIV-related intersectional stigma and discrimination to improve public health outcomes: an AJPH supplement. Am. J. Public Health 112:Suppl.335–37
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. 2009. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement. Sci. 4:50
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Damschroder LJ, Reardon CM, Opra Widerquist MA, Lowery JC 2022a. Conceptualizing outcomes for use with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): the CFIR Outcomes Addendum. Implement. Sci. 17:7
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Damschroder LJ, Reardon CM, Opra Widerquist MA, Lowery JC. 2022b. The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback. Implement. Sci. 17:75
     [Google Scholar]
  36. D'Angelo AB, Lopez-Rios J, Flynn AW, Holloway IW, Pantalone DW, Grov C 2021. Insurance- and medical provider–related barriers and facilitators to staying on PrEP: results from a qualitative study. Transl. Behav. Med. 11:573–81
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Daskalakis D, Silvera R, Bernstein K, Stein D, Hagerty R et al. 2009. Implementation of HIV testing at 2 New York City bathhouses: from pilot to clinical service. Clin. Infect. Dis. 48:1609–16
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Darrow WW. 2021. The first 40 years of AIDS: promising programs, limited success. AIDS Behav. 25:3449–71
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Dep. Health Hum. Serv. 2022. HIV care continuum Policies & Issues Fact Sheet Dep. Health Hum. Serv. Washington, DC: https://www.hiv.gov/federal-response/policies-issues/hiv-aids-care-continuum
  40. Desrosiers A, Levy M, Dright A, Zumer M, Jallah N et al. 2019. A randomized controlled pilot study of a culturally-tailored counseling intervention to increase uptake of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among young Black men who have sex with men in Washington, DC. AIDS Behav. 23:105–15
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Doblecki-Lewis S, Jones D. 2016. Community federally qualified health centers as homes for HIV preexposure prophylaxis: perspectives from South Florida. J. Int. Assoc. Provid. AIDS Care 15:522–28
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Dubov A, Galbo P Jr., Altice FL, Fraenkel L. 2018. Stigma and shame experiences by MSM who take PrEP for HIV prevention: a qualitative study. Am. J. Men's Health 12:1843–54
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Eccles MP, Mittman BS. 2006. Welcome to Implementation Science. Implement. Sci. 1:1
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Egan JE, Ho K, Stall R, Drucker MT, Tappin R et al. 2020. Feasibility of short-term PrEP uptake for men who have sex with men with episodic periods of increased HIV risk. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 84:508–13
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Fauci AS, Redfield RR, Sigounas G, Weahkee MD, Giroir BP. 2019. Ending the HIV epidemic: a plan for the United States. JAMA 321:844–45
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Fisher JD, Fisher WA 2002. The information–motivation–behavioral skills model. Emerging Theories in Health Promotion Practice and Research: Strategies for Improving Public Health RJ DiClemente, RA Crosby, MC Kegler 40–70. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Fonner VA, Dalglish SL, Kennedy CE, Baggaley R, O'Reilly KR et al. 2016. Effectiveness and safety of oral HIV preexposure prophylaxis for all populations. AIDS 30:1973–83
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Freire P. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Penguin
  49. Frye V, Nandi V, Paige MQ, McCrossin J, Lucy D et al. 2021. TRUST: assessing the efficacy of an intervention to increase HIV self-testing among young Black men who have sex with men (MSM) and transwomen. AIDS Behav. 25:1219–35
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Fuchs JD, Stojanovski K, Vittinghoff E, McMahan VM, Hosek SG et al. 2018. A mobile health strategy to support adherence to antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis. AIDS Patient Care STDs 32:104–11
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Garcia M, Harris AL. 2017. PrEP awareness and decision-making for Latino MSM in San Antonio, Texas. PLOS ONE 12:e0184014
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Garofalo R, Hotton AL, Kuhns LM, Gratzer B, Mustanski B. 2016. Incidence of HIV infection and sexually transmitted infections and related risk factors among very young men who have sex with men. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 72:79–86
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Goodreau SM, Rosenberg ES, Jenness SM, Luisi N, Stansfield SE et al. 2017. Sources of racial disparities in HIV prevalence in men who have sex with men in Atlanta, GA, USA: a modelling study. Lancet HIV 4:e311–20
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Greene GJ, Swann G, Fought AJ, Carballo-Dieguez A, Hope TJ et al. 2017. Preferences for long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), daily oral PrEP, or condoms for HIV prevention among U.S. men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 21:1336–49
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Grusky O, Roberts KJ, Swanson AN, Rhoades H, Lam M. 2010. Staff strategies for improving HIV detection using mobile HIV rapid testing. Behav. Med. 35:101–11
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Hakre S, Blaylock JM, Dawson P, Beckett C, Garges EC et al. 2016. Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among US Air Force health care providers. Medicine 95:e4511
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Halkitis PN, Kupprat SA, McCree DH, Simons SM, Jabouin R et al. 2011. Evaluation of the relative effectiveness of three HIV testing strategies targeting African American men who have sex with men (MSM) in New York City. Ann. Behav. Med. 42:361–69
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Havens JP, Scarsi KK, Sayles H, Klepser DG, Swindells S, Bares SH. 2019. Acceptability and feasibility of a pharmacist-led HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) program in the Midwestern United States. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6:10ofz365
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Hirshfield S, Chiasson MA, Joseph H, Scheinmann R, Johnson WD et al. 2012. An online randomized controlled trial evaluating HIV prevention digital media interventions for men who have sex with men. PLOS ONE 7:e46252
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Hosek SG, Green KR, Siberry G, Lally M, Balthazar C et al. 2013a. Integrating behavioral HIV interventions into biomedical prevention trials with youth: lessons from Chicago's Project PrEPare. J. HIV AIDS Soc. Serv. 12:333–48
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Hosek SG, Landovitz RJ, Kapogiannis B, Siberry GK, Rudy B et al. 2017. Safety and feasibility of antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis for adolescent men who have sex with men aged 15 to 17 years in the United States. JAMA Pediatr. 171:1063–71
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Hosek SG, Siberry G, Bell M, Lally M, Kapogiannis B et al. 2013b. The acceptability and feasibility of an HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) trial with young men who have sex with men. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 62:447–56
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Hwang S, Birken SA, Melvin CL, Rohweder CL, Smith JD. 2020. Designs and methods for implementation research: advancing the mission of the CTSA program. J. Clin. Transl. Sci. 4:159–67
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Jenkins Hall W, Sun CJ, Tanner AE, Mann L, Stowers J, Rhodes SD 2017. HIV-prevention opportunities with GPS-based social and sexual networking applications for men who have sex with men. AIDS Educ. Prev. 29:38–48
     [Google Scholar]
  65. John SA, Whitfield THF, Rendina HJ, Parsons JT, Grov C. 2018. Will gay and bisexual men taking oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) switch to long-acting injectable PrEP should it become available?. AIDS Behav. 22:1184–89
     [Google Scholar]
  66. King HL, Keller SB, Giancola MA, Rodriguez DA, Chau JJ et al. 2014. Pre-exposure prophylaxis accessibility research and evaluation (PrEPARE study). AIDS Behav. 18:1722–25
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Klein CH, Kuhn T, Huxley D, Kennel J, Withers E, Lomonaco CG. 2017. Preliminary findings of a technology-delivered sexual health promotion program for black men who have sex with men: quasi-experimental outcome study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 3:e78
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Koss CA, Hosek SG, Bacchetti P, Anderson PL, Liu AY et al. 2018. Comparison of measures of adherence to human immunodeficiency virus preexposure prophylaxis among adolescent and young men who have sex with men in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 66:213–19
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Krakower DS, Mimiaga MJ, Rosenberger JG, Novak DS, Mitty JA et al. 2012. Limited awareness and low immediate uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men using an internet social networking site. PLOS ONE 7:e33119
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Lalley-Chareczko L, Clark D, Conyngham C, Zuppa A, Moorthy G et al. 2018. Delivery of TDF/FTC for pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV-1 acquisition in young adult men who have sex with men and transgender women of color using a urine adherence assay. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 79:173–78
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Landovitz RJ, Beymer M, Kofron R, Amico KR, Psaros C et al. 2017. Plasma tenofovir levels to support adherence to TDF/FTC preexposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention in MSM in Los Angeles, California. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 76:501–11
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Lelutiu-Weinberger C, Golub SA. 2016. Enhancing PrEP access for Black and Latino men who have sex with men. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 73:547–55
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Li DH, Benbow N, Keiser B, Mongrella M, Ortiz K et al. 2022. Determinants of implementation for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis based on an updated consolidated framework for implementation research: a systematic review. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 90:Suppl. 1235–46
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Lightfoot MA, Campbell CK, Moss N, Treves-Kagan S, Agnew E et al. 2018. Using a social network strategy to distribute HIV self-test kits to African American and Latino MSM. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 79:38–45
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Liu AY, Vittinghoff E, von Felten P, Rivet Amico K, Anderson PL et al. 2019. Randomized controlled trial of a mobile health intervention to promote retention and adherence to preexposure prophylaxis among young people at risk for human immunodeficiency virus: the EPIC study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 68:2010–17
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Maksut JL, Eaton LA, Driver R, Knowles CM, Watson RJ. 2021. Factors associated with awareness and use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among Black men who have sex with men with a recent STI diagnosis. Behav. Med. 47:161–69
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Maksut JL, Eaton LA, Siembida EJ, Driffin DD, Baldwin R. 2016. A test of concept study of at-home, self-administered HIV testing with web-based peer counseling via video chat for men who have sex with men. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2:e170
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Marlin RW, Young SD, Bristow CC, Wilson G, Rodriguez J et al. 2014. Piloting an HIV self-test kit voucher program to raise serostatus awareness of high-risk African Americans, Los Angeles. BMC Public Health 14:1226
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Martinez RG, Lewis CC, Weiner BJ. 2014. Instrumentation issues in implementation science. Implement. Sci. 9:118
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Martínez-Donate AP, Zellner JA, Sañudo F, Fernandez-Cerdeño A, Hovell MF et al. 2010. Hombres sanos: evaluation of a social marketing campaign for heterosexually identified Latino men who have sex with men and women. Am. J. Public Health 100:2532–40
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Mayer KH, Nelson L, Hightow-Weidman L, Mimiaga MJ, Mena L et al. 2021. The persistent and evolving HIV epidemic in American men who have sex with men. Lancet 397:1116–26
     [Google Scholar]
  82. McCree DH, Millett G, Baytop C, Royal S, Ellen J et al. 2013. Lessons learned from use of social network strategy in HIV testing programs targeting African American men who have sex with men. Am. J. Public Health 103:1851–56
     [Google Scholar]
  83. McGoy SL, Pettit AC, Morrison M, Alexander LR, Johnson P et al. 2018. Use of social network strategy among young black men who have sex with men for HIV testing, linkage to care, and reengagement in care, Tennessee, 2013–2016. Public Health Rep. 133:2 Suppl.43S–51S
     [Google Scholar]
  84. McNulty M, Smith JD, Villamar J, Burnett-Zeigler I, Vermeer W et al. 2019. Implementation research methodologies for achieving scientific equity and health equity. Ethn. Dis. 29:83–92
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Merle JL, Li D, Keiser B, Zamantakis A, Quieroz A et al. 2023. Categorizing implementation determinants and strategies within the HIV implementation literature: a global systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 13:e070216
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. 2011. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement. Sci. 6:42
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Mitchell JT, LeGrand S, Hightow-Weidman LB, McKellar MS, Kashuba AD et al. 2018. Smartphone-based contingency management intervention to improve pre-exposure prophylaxis adherence: pilot trial. JMIR mHealth uHealth 6:e10456
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Moitra E, van den Berg JJ, Sowemimo-Coker G, Chau S, Nunn A, Chan PA. 2020. Open pilot trial of a brief motivational interviewing-based HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis intervention for men who have sex with men: preliminary effects, and evidence of feasibility and acceptability. AIDS Care 32:406–10
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Mustanski B, Morgan E, D'Aquila R, Birkett M, Janulis P, Newcomb ME 2019a. Individual and network factors associated with racial disparities in HIV among young men who have sex with men: results from the RADAR Cohort Study. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 80:24–30
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Mustanski B, Moskowitz DA, Moran KO, Rendina HJ, Newcomb ME, Macapagal K. 2020. Factors associated with HIV testing in teenage men who have sex with men. Pediatrics 145:e20192322
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Mustanski B, Ryan DT, Newcomb ME, D'Aquila RT, Matson M 2019b. Very high HIV incidence and associated risk factors in a longitudinal cohort study of diverse adolescent and young adult men who have sex with men and transgender women. AIDS Behav. 24:1966–75
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Mustanski B, Smith JD, Keiser B, Li DH, Benbow N. 2022. Supporting the growth of domestic HIV implementation research in the United States through coordination, consultation, and collaboration: how we got here and where we are headed. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 90:Suppl. 1S1–8
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Ng JY, Ntoumanis N, Thogersen-Ntoumani C, Deci EL, Ryan RM et al. 2012. Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: a meta-analysis. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 7:325–40
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Nilsen P. 2015. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement. Sci. 10:53
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Ojile N, Sweet D, Kallail KJ. 2017. A preliminary study of the attitudes and barriers of family physicians to prescribing HIV preexposure prophylaxis. Kan. J. Med. 10:240–42
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Oster AM, Wiegand RE, Sionean C, Miles IJ, Thomas PE et al. 2011. Understanding disparities in HIV infection between black and white MSM in the United States. AIDS 25:1103–12
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Parish CL, Santella AJ. 2018. A qualitative study of rapid HIV testing and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer competency in the oral health setting: practices and attitudes of New York State dental directors. Oral Health Prev. Dent. 16:333–38
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Phillips G II, McCuskey DJ, Felt D, Raman AB, Hayford CS et al. 2020. Geospatial perspectives on health: the PrEP4Love campaign and the role of local context in health promotion messaging. Soc. Sci. Med. 265:113497
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Powell BJ, McMillen JC, Proctor EK, Carpenter CR, Griffey RT et al. 2012. A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health. Med. Care Res. Rev. 69:123–57
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, Damschroder LJ, Smith JL et al. 2015. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement. Sci. 10:21
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. 1982. Transtheoretical therapy: toward a more integrative model of change. Psychother. Theory Res. Pract. 19:276–88
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. 2013. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement. Sci. 8:139
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Proctor EK, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G et al. 2011. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm. Policy Ment. Health 38:65–76
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Purcell DW, Namkung Lee A, Dempsey A, Gordon C 2022. Enhanced federal collaborations in implementation science and research of HIV prevention and treatment. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 90:Suppl. 117–22
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Pyra M, Motley D, Bouris A. 2022. Moving toward equity: fostering transdisciplinary research between the social and behavioral sciences and implementation science to end the HIV epidemic. Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS 17:89–99
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Queiroz A, Mongrella M, Keiser B, Li DH, Benbow N, Mustanski B. 2022. Profile of the portfolio of NIH-funded HIV implementation research projects to inform ending the HIV epidemic strategies. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 90:Suppl. 123–31
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Qureshi N, Javanbakht M, Tadesse M, Malek M, Cox G. 2018. Risk-based HIV testing at Los Angeles County Men's Central Jail. J. Correct. Health Care 24:309–19
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Rabin BA, McCreight M, Battaglia C, Ayele R, Burke RE et al. 2018. Systematic, multimethod assessment of adaptations across four diverse health systems interventions. Front. Public Health 6:102
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Rabin BA, Purcell P, Naveed S, Moser RP, Henton MD et al. 2012. Advancing the application, quality and harmonization of implementation science measures. Implement. Sci. 7:119
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Ratinaud P, Marchand P. 2012. Application de la méthode ALCESTE aux «gros» corpus et stabilité des «mondes lexicaux»: analyse du «CableGate» avec IRAMUTEQ. J. Int. Anal. Stat. Données Text. 11:835–44
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Reilly KL, Kennedy S, Porter G, Estabrooks P. 2020. Comparing, contrasting, and integrating dissemination and implementation outcomes included in the RE-AIM and implementation outcomes frameworks. Front. Public Health 8:430
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Rhodes SD. 2004. Hookups or health promotion? An exploratory study of a chat room–based HIV prevention intervention for men who have sex with men. AIDS Educ. Prev. 16:315–27
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Rivera DB, Brady JP, Blashill AJ. 2021. Traditional machismo, caballerismo, and the pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) cascade among a sample of Latino sexual minority men. J. Sex Res. 58:21–28
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Rolle C-P, Rosenberg ES, Luisi N, Grey J, Sanchez T et al. 2017. Willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis among Black and White men who have sex with men in Atlanta, Georgia. Int. J. STD AIDS 28:849–57
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Schank RC, Berman TR 2002. The pervasive role of stories in knowledge and action. Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations MC Green, JJ Strange, TC Brock 287–313. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Schlechter CR, Del Fiol G, Lam CY, Fernandez ME, Greene T et al. 2021. Application of community–engaged dissemination and implementation science to improve health equity. Prev. Med. Rep. 24:101620
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Shaeer KM, Sherman EM, Shafiq S, Hardigan P. 2014. Exploratory survey of Florida pharmacists’ experience, knowledge, and perception of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. 54:610–17
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Shrestha RK, Chavez PR, Noble M, Sansom SL, Sullivan PS et al. 2020. Estimating the costs and cost-effectiveness of HIV self-testing among men who have sex with men, United States. J. Int. AIDS Soc. 23:e25445
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Shrestha RK, Sansom SL, Kimbrough L, Hutchinson AB, Daltry D et al. 2010. Cost-effectiveness of using social networks to identify undiagnosed HIV infection among minority populations. J. Public Health Manag. Pract. 16:457–64
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Siegler AJ, Mouhanna F, Giler RM, Weiss K, Pembleton E et al. 2018. The prevalence of pre-exposure prophylaxis use and the pre-exposure prophylaxis–to–need ratio in the fourth quarter of 2017, United States. Ann. Epidemiol. 28:841–49
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Siegler AJ, Wiatrek S, Mouhanna F, Amico KR, Dominguez K et al. 2020. Validation of the HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis stigma scale: performance of Likert and semantic differential scale versions. AIDS Behav. 24:2637–49
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Skarbinski J, Rosenberg E, Paz-Bailey G, Hall HI, Rose CE et al. 2015. Human immunodeficiency virus transmission at each step of the care continuum in the United States. JAMA Intern. Med. 175:588–96
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Smith JD, Davis P, Kho AN. 2021. Community-driven health solutions on Chicago's South Side. Stanford Soc. Innov. Rev. 19:A27–29
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Smith JD, Hasan M. 2020. Quantitative approaches for the evaluation of implementation research studies. Psychiatr. Res. 283:112521
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Smith JD, Li DH, Hirschhorn LR, Gallo C, McNulty M et al. 2020a. Landscape of HIV implementation research funded by the National Institutes of Health: a mapping review of project abstracts. AIDS Behav. 24:1903–11
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Smith JD, Li DH, Rafferty MR. 2020b. The implementation research logic model: a method for planning, executing, reporting, and synthesizing implementation projects. Implement. Sci. 15:84
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Smith JD, Merle JL, Webster KA, Cahue S, Penedo FJ, Garcia SF. 2022. Tracking dynamic changes in implementation strategies over time within a hybrid type 2 trial of an electronic patient-reported oncology symptom and needs monitoring program. Front. Health Serv. 2:983217
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Smith LR, Patel VV, Tsai AC, Mittal ML, Quinn K et al. 2022. Integrating intersectional and syndemic frameworks for ending the US HIV epidemic. Am. J. Public Health 112:Suppl. 4340–43
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Sullivan PS, Johnson AS, Pembleton ES, Stephenson R, Justice AC et al. 2021. Epidemiology of HIV in the USA: epidemic burden, inequities, contexts, and responses. Lancet 397:1095–106
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Taggart T, Rendina HJ, Boone CA, Burns P, Carter J et al. 2022. Stigmatizing spaces and places as axes of intersectional stigma among sexual minority men in HIV prevention research. Am. J. Public Health 112:Suppl. 4371–73
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Terndrup C, Streed CG, Tiberio P, Black M, Davis J et al. 2019. A cross-sectional survey of internal medicine resident knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and experiences regarding pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV infection. J. Gen. Int. Med. 34:1258–78
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Tripathi A, Whiteside YO, Duffus WA. 2013. Perceptions and attitudes about preexposure prophylaxis among seronegative partners and the potential of sexual disinhibition. South. Med. J. 106:558–64
     [Google Scholar]
  133. Washington TA, Applewhite S, Glenn W. 2017. Using Facebook as a platform to direct young black men who have sex with men to a video-based HIV testing intervention: a feasibility study. Urban Soc. Work 1:36–52
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Waltz TJ, Powell BJ, Fernandez ME, Abadie B, Damschroder LJ. 2019. Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions. Implement. Sci. 14:42
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Waltz TJ, Powell BJ, Matthieu MM, Damschroder LJ, Chinman MJ et al. 2015. Use of concept mapping to characterize relationships among implementation strategies and assess their feasibility and importance: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study. Implement. Sci. 10:109
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Whitfield THF, Parsons JT, Rendina HJ. 2020. Rates of pre-exposure prophylaxis use and discontinuation among a large U.S. national sample of sexual minority men and adolescents. Arch. Sex. Behav. 49:103–12
     [Google Scholar]
  137. Zamantakis A, Li DH, Benbow N, Smith JD, Mustanski B. 2022. Determinants of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) implementation in transgender populations: a qualitative scoping review. AIDS Behav. 27:1600–18
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-032620-035725
Loading
A Systematic Review of Implementation Research on Determinants and Strategies of Effective HIV Interventions for Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States
Annual Review of Psychology 75, 55 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032620-035725
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-032620-035725
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-032620-035725
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplemental Material

Supplementary Data

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error