1932

Abstract

Archaeology is a field of research that relies largely on the remains of past humans and nonhuman animals and the traces of their interactions within a range of material conditions. In archaeology, as in sociocultural anthropology, the dominant analytical perspective on human–animal relations is ontologically anthropocentric: the study of the human use of nonhuman animals for the benefit of human beings, and scholarly inquiry that is largely for the sake of elucidating what nonhuman animals can tell us about the human condition. This review outlines the historical trajectory of Anglo-American archaeology's encounters with animal remains, and human–animal interactions, within this framework and considers recent attempts to move beyond anthropocentrism.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041346
2017-10-23
2024-05-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/anthro/46/1/annurev-anthro-102116-041346.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041346&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adams CJ. 1990. The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory New York: Continuum
  2. Adams CJ, Donovan J. 1995. Animals and Women: Feminist Theoretical Explorations Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  3. Albarella U, Trentacoste A. 2011. Ethnozooarchaeology. The Present and Past of Human-Animal Relationships Oxford, UK: Oxbow Books
  4. Alberti B, Fowles S, Holbraad M, Marshall Y, Witmore C. 2011. “Worlds otherwise”: archaeology, anthropology, and ontological difference. Curr. Anthropol. 52:6896–912 [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson K. 1997. A walk on the wild side: a critical geography of domestication. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 21:4463–85 [Google Scholar]
  6. Anderson K. 1998. Animal domestication in geographic perspective. Soc. Anim. 6:2119–35 [Google Scholar]
  7. Argent G. 2010. Do clothes make the horse? Relationality, roles and statuses in Iron Age Inner Asia. World Archaeol 42:2157–74 [Google Scholar]
  8. Arluke A, Sanders CR. 2009. Between the Species: Readings in Human-Animal Relations Boston: Allyn & Bacon
  9. Armstrong Oma K. 2007. Human-Animal Relationships: Mutual Becomings in Scandinavian and Sicilian Households 900–500 BC Oslo: Unipub
  10. Armstrong Oma K. 2010. Between trust and domination: social contracts between humans and animals. World Archaeol 42:2175–87 [Google Scholar]
  11. Armstrong Oma K, Birke L. 2013. Archaeology and human-animal studies. Soc. Anim. 21:2113–19 [Google Scholar]
  12. Armstrong Oma K, Hedeager L. 2010. Introduction. World Archaeol 42:2155–56 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bateson G. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  14. Bertelsen BE, Bendixsen S. 2017. Critical Anthropological Engagements in Human Alterity and Difference New York: Springer
  15. Bessire L, Bond D. 2014. Ontological anthropology and the deferral of critique. Am. Ethnol. 41:3440–56 [Google Scholar]
  16. Betts MW, Hardenberg M, Stirling I. 2015. How animals create human history: relational ecology and the dorset-polar bear connection. Am. Antiq. 80:189–112 [Google Scholar]
  17. Binford LR. 1978. Nunamiut Ethnoarchaeology New York: Academic
  18. Binford LR. 1981. Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths New York: Academic
  19. Binford LR. 1983. In Pursuit of the Past: Decoding the Archaeological Record London: Thames & Hudson
  20. Bird-David N. 1999. “Animism” revisited: personhood, environment, and relational epistemology. Curr. Anthropol. 40:S1S67–91 [Google Scholar]
  21. Birke LA, Brylde M, Lykke N. 2004. Animal performances. An exploration of intersections between feminist science studies and studies of human/animal relationships. Fem. Theory 5:2167–83 [Google Scholar]
  22. Birke LIA. 1991a. Science, feminism and animal natures I: Extending the boundaries. Women. Stud. Int. Forum. 14:443–49 [Google Scholar]
  23. Birke LIA. 1991b. Science, feminism and animal natures II: Feminist critiques and the place of animals in science. Women. Stud. Int. Forum. 14:451–58 [Google Scholar]
  24. Boddice R. 2011. Anthropocentrism: Humans, Animals, Environments Leiden: Brill
  25. Boyd B. 2017. Ecologies of fiber-work: animal technologies and invisible craft practices in prehistoric southwest Asia. Quat. Internat. In press
  26. Brittain M, Overton N. 2013. The significance of others: a prehistory of rhythm and interspecies participation. Soc. Anim. 21:134–49 [Google Scholar]
  27. Brown LA. 2005. Planting the bones: hunting ceremonialism at contemporary and nineteenth-century shrines in the Guatamalan Highlands. Lat. Am. Antiq. 16:2131–46 [Google Scholar]
  28. Brück J. 2005. Experiencing the past? The development of a phenomenological archaeology in British prehistory. Archaeol. Dialogues 12:145–72 [Google Scholar]
  29. Cassidy R. 2007. Introduction: domestication reconsidered. See Cassidy & Mullin 2007 1–25
  30. Cassidy R. 2012. Lives with others: climate change and human-animal relations. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 41:21–36 [Google Scholar]
  31. Cassidy R, Mullin M. 2007. Where the Wild Things Are Now: Domestication Reconsidered Oxford, UK: Berg
  32. Claassen CP. 1991. Gender, shellfishing, and the shell mound archaic. See Gero & Conkey 1991 276–300
  33. Clark JGD. 1952. Prehistoric Europe: The Economic Basis New York: Philos. Libr.
  34. Clark JGD. 1954. Excavations at Star Carr: An Early Mesolithic Site at Seamer Near Scarborough, Yorkshire Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press Arch.
  35. Conkey MW. 1982. Boundedness in art and society. See Hodder 1982 115–28
  36. Conkey MW, Spector JD. 1984. Archaeology and the study of gender. Adv. Archaeol. Method Theory 7:1–38 [Google Scholar]
  37. Conneller C. 2004. Becoming deer. Corporeal transformations at Star Carr. Archaeol. Dialogues 11:137–56 [Google Scholar]
  38. Conneller C. 2011. An Archaeology of Materials: Substantial Transformations in Early Prehistoric Europe New York/London: Routledge
  39. Cuomo CJ, Gruen L. 1998. On puppies and pussies: animals, intimacy, and moral distance. Daring to Be Good: Essays in Feminist Ethico-Politics BA Bar On, A Ferguson 129–42 New York/London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  40. Dietler M. 1996. Feasts and commensal politics in the political economy: food, power, and status in prehistoric Europe. Food and the Status Quest: An Interdisciplinary Perspective PW Weissner, W Schiefenhövel 87–125 Providence, RI: Berghahn [Google Scholar]
  41. Dietler M, Hayden B. 2001. Feasts: Archaeological and Ethnographic Perspectives on Food, Politics and Power Washington, DC: Smithson. Inst.
  42. Deleuze G, Guattari F. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
  43. Deleuze G, Smith DW, Greco MA. 1997. Literature and life. Crit. Inq. 23:2225–30 [Google Scholar]
  44. Derrida J. 1989. Of Spirit: Heidegger and the Question Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  45. Derrida J. 1993. Aporias Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  46. Descola P. 1992. Societies of nature and the nature of society. Conceptualizing Society A Kuper 107–26 London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  47. Descola P. 1994. In the Society of Nature: A Native Ecology in Amazonia Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  48. Descola P. 2013. The Ecology of Others Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press
  49. Descola P, Palsson G. 1996. Nature and Society: Anthropological Perspectives New York/London: Routledge
  50. Douglas M. 1957. Animals in Lele religious symbolism. Africa 27:146–58 [Google Scholar]
  51. Douglas M. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
  52. Dransart PZ. 2002. Earth, Water, Fleece and Fabric: An Ethnography and Archaeology of Andean Camelid Herding London/New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  53. Evans-Pritchard EE. 1940. The Nuer, A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Nilotic People Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press
  54. Fowles S. 2016. The perfect subject (postcolonial object studies). Archaeol. Dialogues 21:19–27 [Google Scholar]
  55. Francione GL. 1995. Animals, Property, and the Law Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press
  56. Francione GL. 1996. Rain Without Thunder: The Ideology of the Animal Rights Movement Philadelphia, PA: Temple Univ. Press
  57. Garner R. 1993. Animals, Politics and Morality Manchester, UK: Manchester Univ. Press
  58. Geertz C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays New York: Basic Books
  59. Gero JM, Conkey MW. 1991. Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory Oxford, UK: Blackwell
  60. Gifford-Gonzalez D. 1993. Gaps in zooarchaeological analyses of butchery: Is gender an issue?. From Bones to Behavior: Ethnoarchaeological and Experimental Contributions to the Interpretation of Faunal Remains J Hudson 181–99 Carbondale: South. Ill. Univ. [Google Scholar]
  61. Gifford-Gonzalez D. 1994. Women in Zooarcheology. Archeol. Pap. Am. Anthropol. Assoc. 5:1157–71 [Google Scholar]
  62. Gittins E. 2013. The archaeology of becoming the human animal. Soc. Anim. 21:2120–33 [Google Scholar]
  63. Gould RA. 1985. The empiricist strikes back: reply to Binford. Am. Antiq. 50:638–44 [Google Scholar]
  64. Gould RA, Watson PJ. 1982. A dialogue on the meaning and use of analogy in ethnoarchaeological reasoning. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 1:4355–81 [Google Scholar]
  65. Grant A. 1984. Survival or sacrifice? A critical appraisal of animal burials in Britain in the Iron Age. Animals and Archaeology 4: Husbandry in Europe C Grigson, J Clutton-Brock 221–27 Oxford, UK: Archaeopress [Google Scholar]
  66. Grant A. 1991. Economic or symbolic? Animals and ritual behaviour. Sacred and Profane: Proceedings of a Conference on Archaeology, Ritual, and Religion P Garwood 109–14 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Comm. Archaeol. Monogr. [Google Scholar]
  67. Grayson DK. 1973. On the methodology of faunal analysis. Am. Antiq. 38:432–39 [Google Scholar]
  68. Gruen L. 1991. Animals. A Companion to Ethics P Singer 343–53 Oxford, UK: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  69. Haraway DJ. 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science London: Routledge
  70. Haraway DJ. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature New York: Routledge
  71. Harris M. 1966. The cultural ecology of India's sacred cattle. Curr. Anthropol. 7:151–66 [Google Scholar]
  72. Hartigan H Jr.. 2015. Aesop's Anthropology: A Multispecies Approach Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
  73. Hayles NK. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  74. Hayward T. 1997. Anthropocentrism: a misunderstood problem. Environ. Value 6:149–63 [Google Scholar]
  75. Heidegger M. 1962. Being and Time New York: Harper & Row
  76. Heidegger M. 1983. The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
  77. Helmreich S. 2009. Alien Ocean: Anthropological Voyages in Microbial Seas Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  78. Henare AJM, Holbraad M, Wastell S. 2007. Thinking through Things: Theorising Artefacts Ethnographically London: Routledge
  79. Higgs ES. 1972. Papers in Economic Prehistory Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  80. Higgs ES. 1975. Palaeoeconomy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  81. Hill E. 2013. Archaeology and animal persons: toward a prehistory of human-animal relations. Environ. Soc. Adv. Res. 4:117–36 [Google Scholar]
  82. Hill JD. 1995. Ritual and Rubbish in the Iron Age of Wessex: A Study on the Formation of a Specific Archaeological Record Oxford, UK: Br. Archaeol. Rep.
  83. Hodder I. 1982. Symbolic and Structural Archaeology Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  84. Hodder I, Meskell L. 2011. A “curious and sometimes a trifle macabre artistry”: some aspects of symbolism in Neolithic Turkey. Curr. Anthropol. 52:2235–62 [Google Scholar]
  85. Holtorf C. 2000. Sculptures in captivity and monkeys on megaliths: observations in zoo archaeology. Public Archaeol 1:3195–210 [Google Scholar]
  86. Ingold T. 1974. On reindeer and men. Man 9:4523–38 [Google Scholar]
  87. Ingold T. 1986. The Appropriation of Nature: Essays on Human Ecology and Social Relations Manchester, UK: Manchester Univ. Press
  88. Ingold T. 1994a. Humanity and animality. Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology: Humanity, Culture and Social Life T Ingold 14–32 London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  89. Ingold T. 1994b. From trust to domination: an alternative history of human-animal relations. Animals and Human Societies: Changing Perspectives A Manning, J Serpell 1–22 London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  90. Ingold T. 1995. Building, dwelling, living: how animals and people make themselves at home in the world. Shifting Contexts: Transformations in Anthropological Knowledge M Strathern 57–80 London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  91. Ingold T. 2011. Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill London: Routledge
  92. Ingold T. 2013. Anthropology beyond humanity. Suomen Antropol. J. Fin. Anthropol. Soc. 38:35–23 [Google Scholar]
  93. Insoll T. 2010. Talensi animal sacrifice and its archaeological implications. World Archaeol 42:2231–44 [Google Scholar]
  94. Jolley RL. 1983. North American historic sites zooarchaeology. Hist. Archaeol. 17:264–79 [Google Scholar]
  95. Kelly JD. 2014. Introduction: The ontological turn in French philosophical anthropology. HAU: J. Ethnogr. Theory 4:1259–69 [Google Scholar]
  96. King FW, Porter CM, Wing ES. 2003. Zooarchaeology: Papers to Honor Elizabeth S. Wing Gainesville: Fla. Mus. Nat. Hist.
  97. Kirksey E. 2014. The Multispecies Salon Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  98. Kirksey SE, Helmreich S. 2010. The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cult. Anthropol. 25:4545–76 [Google Scholar]
  99. Kohn E. 2007. How dogs dream: Amazonian natures and the politics of transspecies engagement. Am. Ethnol. 34:13–24 [Google Scholar]
  100. Kohn E. 2013. How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology beyond the Human Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  101. Kohn E. 2015. Anthropology of ontologies. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 44:311–27 [Google Scholar]
  102. Kostyrko M, Kajda K, Kobiałka D, Mlekuž D. 2016. An archaeological flight further than post-processualism—seeking a non-anthropocentric perspective. AARGnews 52:71–79 [Google Scholar]
  103. Kuper A. 1982. Lineage theory: a critical retrospect. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 11:171–95 [Google Scholar]
  104. Larsen G, Piperno DR, Allaby RG, Purugganan MD, Andersson L. et al. 2014. Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies. PNAS 111:176139–46 [Google Scholar]
  105. Lev-Tov J, deFrance SD. 2010. Animals and complexity: how zooarchaeologists contribute to the study of complex society in the New and Old Worlds. Anthropological Approaches to Zooarchaeology: Colonialism, Complexity, and Animal Transformations DV Campana, P Crabtree, SD deFrance, J Lev-Tov, AM Choyke xi–xiv Oxford, UK: Oxbow Books [Google Scholar]
  106. Lévi-Strauss C. 1963. Totemism Boston: Beacon Press
  107. Lewis-Williams D. 2004. Constructing a cosmos: architecture, power and domestication at Çatalhöyük. J. Soc. Archaeol. 4:128–59 [Google Scholar]
  108. Lyman RL. 2016. Theodore E. White and the Development of Zooarchaeology in North America. Lincoln: Univ. Neb. Press
  109. Marciniak A. 1999. Faunal materials and interpretive archaeology—epistemology reconsidered. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 6:4293–320 [Google Scholar]
  110. Marciniak A. 2005. Placing Animals in the Neolithic: Social Zooarchaeology of Prehistoric Farming Communities London: Routledge
  111. Marder M. 2013. Plant-Thinking: A Philosophy of Vegetal Life New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  112. Marom N, Bar-Oz G. 2013. The prey pathway: a regional history of cattle (Bos taurus) and pig (Sus scrofa) domestication in the northern Jordan Valley. PLOS ONE 8:2e55958 [Google Scholar]
  113. MacCormack C, Strathern M. 1980. Nature, Culture and Gender Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  114. McNiven IJ. 2010. Navigating the human-animal divide: marine mammal hunters and rituals of sensory allurement. World Archaeol 42:2215–30 [Google Scholar]
  115. McNiven IJ, Feldman R. 2003. Ritually orchestrated seascapes: hunting magic and dugong bone mounds in Torres Strait, NE Australia. Camb. Archaeol. J. 13:2169–94 [Google Scholar]
  116. Merleau-Ponty M. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception New York: Human. Press
  117. Midgley M. 1983. Animals and Why They Matter Athens: Univ. Ga. Press
  118. Milligan T. 2011. Speciesism as a variety of anthropocentrism. See Boddice 2011 223–44
  119. Miracle P, Milner N. 2002. Consuming Passions and Patterns of Consumption Cambridge: McDonald Inst. Archaeol. Res.
  120. Mullin M. 2002. Animals and anthropology. Soc. Anim. 10:4387–94 [Google Scholar]
  121. Mullin MH. 1999. Mirrors and windows: sociocultural studies of human-animal relationships. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 28:1201–24 [Google Scholar]
  122. Nyssönen J, Salmi A-K. 2013. Towards a multiangled study of reindeer agency, overlapping environments, and human-animal relationships. Arctic Anthropol 50:241–50 [Google Scholar]
  123. O'Regan H. 2002. From bear pit to zoo. Br. Archaeol. 68:12–19 [Google Scholar]
  124. Ogden LA, Hall B, Tanita K. 2013. Animals, plants, people, and things: a review of multispecies ethnography. Environ. Soc. Adv. Res. 4:15–24 [Google Scholar]
  125. Orton D. 2010. Between subject and object: herding, inalienability and sentient property in prehistory. World Archaeol 42:2188–200 [Google Scholar]
  126. Overton NJ, Hamilakis Y. 2013. A manifesto for a social zooarchaeology. Swans and other beings in the Mesolithic. Archaeol. Dialogues 20:2111–36 [Google Scholar]
  127. Palmer C. 1995. Animal Liberation, Environmental Ethics and Domestication Oxford, UK: Oxford Cent. Environ. Ethics Soc.
  128. Philo C. 1995. Animals, geography, and the city: notes on inclusions and exclusions. Environ. Plan. D 13:6655–81 [Google Scholar]
  129. Philo C, Wilbert C. 2000. Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: New Geographies of Human-Animal Relations London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  130. Plumwood V. 1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature London: Routledge
  131. Poole K. 2015. The contextual cat: human-animal relations and social meaning in Anglo-Saxon England. J. Archaeol. Method. Theory 22:3857–82 [Google Scholar]
  132. Povinelli EA. 2016. Geontologies: A Requiem to Late Liberalism Durham, NC/London: Duke Univ. Press
  133. Pluskowski A. 2010. The zooarchaeology of medieval ‘Christendom’: ideology, the treatment of animals and the making of medieval Europe. World Archaeol 42:2201–14 [Google Scholar]
  134. Ramos AR. 2012. The politics of perspectivism. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 41:481–94 [Google Scholar]
  135. Rappaport RA. 1968. Pigs for the Ancestors: Ritual in the Ecology of a New Guinea People New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  136. Regan T. 1983. The Case for Animal Rights Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  137. Regan T, Singer P. 1976. Animal Rights and Human Obligations Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
  138. Rindos D. 1984. The Origins of Agriculture: An Evolutionary Perspective San Diego, CA: Academic
  139. Risling Baldy C. 2015. Coyote is not a metaphor: on decolonizing, (re)claiming and (re)naming “Coyote.”. Decolonization Indig. Educ. Soc. 4:11–20 [Google Scholar]
  140. Ritvo H. 1995. Border trouble: shifting the line between people and other animals. Soc. Res. 62:481–500 [Google Scholar]
  141. Ritvo H. 1997. The Platypus and the Mermaid: And Other Figments of the Classifying Imagination Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  142. Robison ND. 1987. Zooarchaeology: its history and development. The Zooarchaeology of Eastern North America: History, Method and Theory, and Bibliography AE Bogan, ND Robison 1–26 Knoxville: Tenn. Anthropol. Assoc., Univ. Tenn. [Google Scholar]
  143. Russell N. 2012. Social Zooarchaeology: Humans and Animals in Prehistory New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  144. Russell N. 2014. Social zooarchaeology. Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology C Smith 6761–65 New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  145. Ryan K, Crabtree PJ. 1995. The Symbolic Role of Animals in Archaeology Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Mus. Archaeol. Anthropol.
  146. Ryder RD. 1989. Animal Revolution: Changing Attitudes Towards Speciesism London: Bloomsbury Acad.
  147. Sax B. 2011. What is this quintessence of dust? The concept of the “human” and its origins. See Boddice 2011 21–36
  148. Schork IG, Young RJ. 2014. Rapid animal welfare assessment: an archaeological approach. Biol. Lett. 10:920140390 [Google Scholar]
  149. Serjeantson D. 2000. Good to eat and good to think with: classifying animals from complex sites. Animal Bones, Human Societies P Rowley-Conwy 179–89 Oxford, UK: Oxbow [Google Scholar]
  150. Shapiro KJ. 1990. Animal rights versus humanism: the charge of speciesism. J. Humanist. Psychol. 30:29–37 [Google Scholar]
  151. Sharp LA. 2014. The Transplant Imaginary: Mechanical Hearts, Animal Parts, and Moral Thinking in Highly Experimental Science Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  152. Sheridan A, Bailey GN. 1981. Economic Archaeology: Towards an Integration of Ecological and Social Approaches Oxford, UK: Br. Archaeol. Rep. [Google Scholar]
  153. Singer P. 1975. Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals New York: Eco
  154. Smart A. 2014. Critical perspectives on multispecies ethnography. Crit. Anthropol. 34:13–7 [Google Scholar]
  155. Sodikoff GM. 2012. The Anthropology of Extinction: Essays on Culture and Species Death Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
  156. Spector JD. 1983. Male/female task differentiation among the Hidatsa: toward the development of an archaeological approach to the study of gender. The Hidden Half: Studies of Plains Indian Women P Albers, B Medicine 77–99. Washington, DC: Univ. Press Am. [Google Scholar]
  157. Steeves HP. 1999. Animal Others: On Ethics, Ontology, and Animal Life Albany, NY: State Univ. N.Y. Press
  158. Steward JH. 1955. Theory of Culture Change: The Methodology of Multilinear Evolution Urbana: Univ. Ill. Press
  159. Sykes N. 2014. Beastly Questions: Animal Answers to Archaeological Issues London: Bloomsbury
  160. Taylor WW. 1948. A Study of Archeology Menasha, WI: Am. Anthropol. Assoc. Memoir69
  161. Tilley CY. 1994. A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths, and Monuments Oxford, UK: Berg
  162. Todd Z. 2014. An indigenous feminist's take on the ontological turn: “Ontology” is just another word for colonialism. Urbane Adventurer: Amiskwaci Blog Oct. 24. http://zoeandthecity.wordpress.com/2014/10/24/an-indigenous-feminists-take-on-the-ontological-turn-ontology-is-just-another-word-for-colonialism/
  163. Trinder B. 1993. The archaeology of the British food industry 1660–1960: a preliminary survey. Ind. Archaeol. Rev. 15:2119–39 [Google Scholar]
  164. Tsing AL. 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  165. Twine R. 2012. Revealing the “animal-industrial complex”: a concept and method for critical animal studies. J. Crit. Anim. Stud. 10:112–39 [Google Scholar]
  166. van Dooren T, Kirksey E, Münster U. 2016. Multispecies studies. Cultivating arts of attentiveness. Environ. Humanit. 8:11–23 [Google Scholar]
  167. Vigh HE, Sausdal DB. 2014. From essence back to existence: anthropology beyond the ontological turn. Anthropol. Theory 14:49–73 [Google Scholar]
  168. Viveiros de Castro E. 1998. Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 4:469–88 [Google Scholar]
  169. Viveiros de Castro E. 2012. Cosmological perspectivism in Amazonia and elsewhere: four lectures given in the Department of Social Anthropology, University of Cambridge, February–March 1998. HAU Mastercl. Ser 1:45–168 [Google Scholar]
  170. Viveiros de Castro E. 2014. Cannibal Metaphysics Minneapolis, MN: Univocal
  171. Viveiros de Castro E. 2015. Who is afraid of the ontological wolf? Some comments on an ongoing anthropological debate. Camb. J. Anthropol. 33:12–17 [Google Scholar]
  172. Watts C. 2013. Relational Archaeologies: Humans, Animals, Things New York/London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  173. Weismantel M. 2015. Seeing like an archaeologist: Viveiros de Castro at Chavín de Huantar. J. Soc. Archaeol. 15:2139–59 [Google Scholar]
  174. Weitzenfeld A, Joy M. 2014. An overview of anthropocentrism, humanism, and speciesism in critical animal theory. Defining Critical Animal Studies: An Intersectional Social Justice Approach for Liberation AJ Nocella III, J Sorenson, K Socha, A Matsuka 3–27 New York: Peter Lang [Google Scholar]
  175. Wise SM. 1996. Legal rights for nonhuman animals: the case for chimpanzees and bonobos. Anim. Law 2:179 [Google Scholar]
  176. Wolch JR, Emel J. 1998. Animal Geographies: Place, Politics, and Identity in the Nature-Culture Borderlands London/New York: Verso [Google Scholar]
  177. Wolch JR, West K, Gaines TE. 1995. Transspecies urban theory. Environ. Plan. D 13:6735–60 [Google Scholar]
  178. Wolfe C. 2003. Zoontologies: The Question of the Animal Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
  179. Zeder MA, Emshwiller E, Smith BD, Bradley DG. 2006. Documenting domestication: the intersection of genetics and archaeology. Trends Genet 22:3139–55 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041346
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error