Some Things I Hope You Will Find Useful Even if Statistics Isn't Your Thing

Literature Cited

1. Allen MS, Morrison AE. 2013. Modelling site formation dynamics: geoarchaeological, chronometric and statistical approaches to a stratified rockshelter sequence, Polynesia. J. Archaeol. Sci. 40:4560–75 [Google Scholar]
2. Athens JS, Rieth TM, Dye TS. 2014. A paleoenvironmental and archaeological model-based age estimate for the colonization of Hawai'i. Am. Antiq. 79:1144–55 [Google Scholar]
3. Baxter M. 2003. Statistics in Archaeology New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
4. Baxter M. 2015. Exploratory Multivariate Analysis in Archaeology Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
5. Bayliss A. 2009. Rolling out revolution: using radiocarbon dating in archaeology. Radiocarbon 51:1123–47 [Google Scholar]
6. Beramendi-Orosco L, González-Hernández G, Urrutia-Fucugauchi J, Manzanilla LR, Soler-Arechalde AM. et al. 2009. High-resolution chronology for the Mesoamerican urban center of Teotihuacan derived from Bayesian statistics of radiocarbon and archaeological data. Quat. Res. 71:99–107 [Google Scholar]
7. Brainerd GW. 1951. The place of chronological ordering in archaeological analysis. Am. Antiquity 16:301–13 [Google Scholar]
8. Brumfiel EM. 1995. Heterarchy and the analysis of complex societies: comments. Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies RM Ehrenreich, CL Crumley, JE Levy 125–31 Arlington, VA: Am. Anthropol. Assoc. [Google Scholar]
9. Buck C, Cavanagh WG, Litton CD. 1996. Bayesian Approach to Interpreting Archaeological Data Chichester, UK:: Wiley [Google Scholar]
10. Carballo DM, Pluckhahn T. 2007. Transportation corridors and political evolution in highland Mesoamerica: settlement analyses incorporating GIS for Northern Tlaxcala, Mexico. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 26:607–29 [Google Scholar]
11. Chernoff H. 1973. The use of faces to represent points in k-dimensional space graphically. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 68:361–68 [Google Scholar]
12. Chernoff M. 1982. Empirical Bayes Estimation of ceramic proportions at Teotihuacan Presented at Annu. Meet. Soc. Am. Archaeol., Minneapolis, MN [Google Scholar]
13. Cowgill GL. 1964. Statistics and sense: more on the Purum case. Am. Anthropol. 66:1358–65 [Google Scholar]
14. Cowgill GL. 1968. Computer analysis of archaeological data from Teotihuacan, Mexico. New Perspectives in Archeology SR Binford, LR Binford 143–50 Chicago: Aldine [Google Scholar]
15. Cowgill GL. 1970. Some sampling and reliability problems in archaeology. Archéologie et Calculateurs JC Gardin 161–75 Paris: CNRS [Google Scholar]
16. Cowgill GL. 1972. Models, methods, and techniques for seriation. Models in Archaeology D Clarke 381–421 London: Methuen [Google Scholar]
17. Cowgill GL. 1975a. A selection of samplers: comments on archaeo-statistics. Sampling in Archaeology J Muller 258–74 Tucson: Univ. Ariz. Press [Google Scholar]
18. Cowgill GL. 1975b. On causes and consequences of ancient and modern population changes. Am. Anthropol. 77:505–25 [Google Scholar]
19. Cowgill GL. 1977. The trouble with significance tests and what we can do about it. Am. Antiq. 42:3350–68 [Google Scholar]
20. Cowgill GL. 1989. The concept of diversity in archaeological theory. Quantifying Diversity in Archaeology R Leonard, G Jones 131–41 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
21. Cowgill GL. 1990a. Artifact classification and archaeological purposes. Mathematics and Information Science in Archaeology A Voorrips 61–78 Bonn, Ger: HOLOS Verlag [Google Scholar]
22. Cowgill GL. 1990b. Toward refining concepts of full-coverage survey. The Archaeology of Regions: A Case for Full-Coverage Survey S Fish, S Kowalewski 249–59 Washington, DC: Smithson. Inst. Press [Google Scholar]
23. Cowgill GL. 2005. Things to remember about statistics (whatever else you forget). SAA Archaeol. Rec. 5:435 [Google Scholar]
24. Cowgill GL. 2006. Using numerous cases to extract valid information from noisy surface data at Teotihuacan. Managing Archaeological Data: Essays in Honor of Sylvia W. Gaines JL Hantman, R Most 147–54 Tempe: Ariz. State Univ. Anthropol. Res. Pap. 57 [Google Scholar]
25. Cowgill GL. 2008. How I got to where I am now: one thing after another, a (mostly) linear narrative. Anc. Mesoam. 19:2165–73 [Google Scholar]
26. Cowgill GL. 2013a. Conversation with William L. Rathje and Michael Shanks. Archaeology in the Making: Conversations through a Discipline WL Rathje, M Shanks, C Witmore 185–203 New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
27. Cowgill GL. 2013b. Possible migrations and shifting identities in the Central Mexican Epiclassic. Anc. Mesoam. 24:1131–49 [Google Scholar]
28. Cowgill GL. 2015a. Ancient Teotihuacan: Early Urbanism in Central Mexico New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
29. Cowgill GL. 2015b. We need better chronologies: progress in getting them. Latin Am. Antiq. 26:26–29 [Google Scholar]
30. Cowgill GL, Altschul JA, Sload R. 1984. Spatial analysis of Teotihuacan: a Mesoamerican metropolis. Intrasite Spatial Analysis in Archaeology H Hietala 154–95 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
31. Drennan RD. 2009. Statistics for Archaeologists: A Common Sense Approach New York: Springer, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
32. Drennan RD, Peterson CE. 2004. Comparing archaeological settlement systems with rank-size graphs: a measure of shape and statistical confidence. J. Archaeol. Sci. 31:533–49 [Google Scholar]
33. Drennan RD, Peterson CE. 2008. Centralized communities, population, and social complexity after sedentarization. The Neolithic Demographic Transition and Its Consequences JP Bocquet-Appel, O Bar-Yosef 359–86 New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
34. Efron B. 2013. Bayes' theorem in the 21st century. Science 340:1177–78 [Google Scholar]
35. Flannery KV. 1998. The ground plans of archaic states. Archaic States GM Feinman, J Marcus 15–57 Santa Fe, NM: Sch. Am. Res. Press [Google Scholar]
36. Flannery KV. 2002. The origins of the village revisited: from nuclear to extended households. Am. Antiq. 67:3417–33 [Google Scholar]
37. Heilen M, Altschul JH. 2013. The accuracy and adequacy of in-field artifact analysis. Adv. Archaeol. Pract. Nov:121–38 [Google Scholar]
38. Hodder I, Orton C. 1976. Spatial Analysis in Archaeology London: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
39. Huff D. 1954. How to Lie With Statistics New York: Norton [Google Scholar]
40. Inomata T, Ortiz R, Arroyo B, Robinson EJ. 2014. Chronological revision of Preclassic Kaminaljuyú, Guatemala: implications for social processes in the Southern Maya Area. Latin Am. Antiq. 25:4337–408 [Google Scholar]
41. Iversen GR. 1984. Bayesian Statistical Inference Beverley Hills, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
42. Kruschke JK. 2014. Doing Bayesian Data Analysis New York: Elsevier, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
43. Lokaj J, Chiarelli JA, Cowgill GL. 1986. The Reliability of Surface Collecting at Teotihuacan Presented at Annu. Meet. Soc. Am. Archaeol., New Orleans [Google Scholar]
44. McGrayne SB. 2011. The Theory That Would Not Die: How Bayes' Rule Cracked the Enigma Code, Hunted Down Russian Submarines, and Emerged Triumphant from Two Centuries of Controversy New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
45. Milne AA. 1926. Winnie-the-Pooh London: Methuen [Google Scholar]
46. Ortman SG, Varien MD, Gripp TL. 2007. Empirical Bayesian methods for archaeological survey data: an application from the Mesa Verde Region. Am. Antiq. 72:2241–72 [Google Scholar]
47. Ossa AE. 2013. Using network expectations to identify multiple exchange systems: a case study from Postclassic Sauce and its Hinterland in Veracruz, Mexico. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 32:415–32 [Google Scholar]
48. Overholtzer L. 2015. Agency, practice, and chronological context: a Bayesian approach to household chronologies. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 37:37–47 [Google Scholar]
49. Peterson CE, Drennan RD. 2005. Communities, settlements, sites, and surveys: regional-scale analysis of prehistoric human interaction. Am. Antiq. 70:15–30 [Google Scholar]
50. Robertson IG. 1999. Spatial and multivariate analysis, random sampling error, and analytical noise: empirical Bayesian methods at Teotihuacan, Mexico. Am. Antiq. 64:137–52 [Google Scholar]
51. Robertson IG. 2001. Mapping the social landscape of an early urban center: socio-spatial variation in Teotihuacan PhD Diss., Dep. Anthropol., Ariz. State Univ., Tempe [Google Scholar]
52. Robinson WS. 1951. A method for chronologically ordering archaeological deposits. Am. Antiq. 16:293–301 [Google Scholar]
53. Schiffer MB. 1976. Behavioral Archeology New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
54. Shennan SJ. 1997. Quantifying Archaeology Iowa City: Univ. Iowa Press [Google Scholar]
55. Spaulding AC. 1953. Statistical techniques for the discovery of artifact types. Am. Antiq. 18:4305–13 [Google Scholar]
56. Spencer CS, Redmond EM. 2006. Resistance strategies and early state formation in Oaxaca, Mexico. Intermediate Elites in Pre-Columbian States and Empires CM Elson, RA Covey 21–43 Tucson: Univ. Ariz. Press [Google Scholar]
57. Tufte ER. 1983. The Visual Display of Quantitative Data Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press [Google Scholar]
58. Willey GR. 1953. Prehistoric Settlement Patterns in the Virú Valley, Peru Washington, DC: Smithson. Inst. [Google Scholar]
59. Yates RDS. 1997. The city state in ancient China. The Archaeology of City-States: Cross Cultural Approaches DL Nichols, TH Charlton 71–90 Washington, DC: Smithson. Inst. [Google Scholar]
60. Yoffee N, Cowgill GL. 1988. The Collapse of Ancient States and Civilizations Tucson: Univ. Ariz. Press [Google Scholar]
61. Zeidler JA, Buck CE, Litton CD. 1998. Integration of archaeological phase information and radiocarbon results from the Jama River Valley, Ecuador: a Bayesian approach. Latin Am. Antiq. 9:2160–79 [Google Scholar]
62. Zipf GK. 1949. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley [Google Scholar]