1932

Abstract

The main objective of this review is to consider what archaeology can contribute to general anthropological theories on “ritual in its own right” and to highlight the potential for advancing knowledge about ritual experience as a distinctive material process. An examination of the exceptional material frame marking ceremonial events demonstrates the value of ritual as a heuristic and challenges archaeologists who privilege the interpretation of religion, affect, ontology, or cultural rationalities as necessarily determinative of the ritualization process. Therefore, archaeologists should not interpret ritual places and residues as immediate proxies of other sociopolitical realities but instead should base their inferences on cross-contextual analyses of archaeological data sets. Ultimately, attention to the amplified materialization of the ritual process, often entailing the performative bundling of disparate material items in archaeological deposits, permits a re-evaluation of theories proposing that ritual is intimately connected to agency and power.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-013838
2015-10-21
2024-06-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/anthro/44/1/annurev-anthro-102214-013838.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-013838&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Albarella U, Serjeantson D. 2002. A passion for pork: meat consumption at the British Isle Neolithic site of Durrington Walls. Consuming Passions and Patterns of Consumption P Miracle, N Milner 33–49 Cambridge, UK: Monogr. McDonald Inst. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alberti B, Bray TL. 2009. Animating archaeology: of subjects, objects, and alternative ontologies. Camb. Archaeol. J. 19:3337–43 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alt SM. 2010. Ancient Complexities: New Perspectives in Pre-Columbian North America Salt Lake City: Univ. Utah Press [Google Scholar]
  4. Angelo D. 2014. Assembling ritual, the burden of the everyday: an exercise in relational ontology in Quebrada de Humahuaca, Argentina. World Archaeol. 46:2270–87 [Google Scholar]
  5. Asad T. 1993. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  6. Aslan R. 2011. No God but God: The Origins, Evolution, and Future of Islam New York: Random House [Google Scholar]
  7. Banning E. 2011. So fair a house: Göbekli Tepe and the identification of temples in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic of the Near East. Curr. Anthropol. 52:5619–60 [Google Scholar]
  8. Barrowclough DA, Malone C. 2007. Cult in Context: Reconsidering Ritual in Archaeology. Oxford, UK: Oxbow Books [Google Scholar]
  9. Bateson G. 1958. Naven: A Survey of the Problems Suggested by a Composite Picture of the Culture of a New Guinea Tribe Drawn from Three Points of View Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  10. Bell C. 1992. Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  11. Bell C. 1997. Ritual Perspectives and Dimensions Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  12. Bloch M. 1989. Ritual, History and Power: Selected Papers in Anthropology. London Sch. Econ. Monogr. Soc. Anthropol., 58 London: Athlone [Google Scholar]
  13. Bloch M. 1992. Prey Into Hunter: The Politics of Religious Experience Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  14. Boivin N. 2000. Life rhythms and floor sequences: excavating time in rural Rajasthan and Neolithic Çatalhöyük. World Archaeol. 31:3367–88 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bradley R. 1991. Ritual, time, and history. World Archaeol. 23:2209–19 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bradley R. 2005. Ritual and Domestic Life in Prehistoric Europe New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  17. Brück J. 1999. Ritual and rationality: some problems of interpretation in European archaeology. Eur. J. Archaeol. 2:313–44 [Google Scholar]
  18. Brück J. 2001. Monuments, power, and personhood in the British Neolithic. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 7:4649–67 [Google Scholar]
  19. Brück J. 2006. Fragmentation, personhood, and the social construction of technology in Middle and Late Bronze Britain. Camb. Archaeol. J. 16:3297–315 [Google Scholar]
  20. Brumfiel E. 2001. Aztec hearts and minds: religion and the state in the Aztec Empire. Empires: Perspectives from Archaeology and History SE Alcock, TN D'Altroy, KD Morrison, CM Sinopoli 283–310 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  21. Chapman J. 2000. Fragmentation in Archaeology London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  22. Chapman J, Gaydarska B. 2007. Parts and Wholes: Fragmentation in Prehistoric Contexts Oxford, UK: Oxbow Books [Google Scholar]
  23. Clark A. 2010. Material surrogacy and the supernatural: reflections on the role of artefacts in ‘off-line cognition.’. The Cognitive Life of Things: Recasting the Boundaries of the Mind L Malafouris, C Renfrew 23–28 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  24. Comaroff J, Comaroff J. 1991. Of Revelation and Revolution: Christianity, Colonialism, and Consciousness in South Africa 1 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  25. Cowgill GL. 2004. Thoughts about rethinking materiality. See DeMarrais et al. 2004 273–80
  26. De Montmollin O. 1989. The Archaeology of Political Structure: Settlement Analysis in a Classic Maya Polity Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  27. DeMarrais E. 2004. The materialization of culture. See DeMarrais et al. 2004 11–22
  28. DeMarrais E, Gosden C, Renfrew C. 2004. Rethinking Materiality: The Engagement of Mind with the Material World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  29. Descola P. 2013. Presence, attachment, origin: ontologies of incarnates. See Lambek & Boddy 2013 35–49
  30. Dietler M. 2001. Theorizing the feast: rituals of consumption, commensal politics, and power in African contexts. Feasts: Archaeological and Ethnographic Perspectives on Food, Politics, and Power M Dietler, B Hayden 65–114 Washington, DC: Smithson. Inst. [Google Scholar]
  31. Dietler M. 2010. Archaeologies of Colonialism: Consumption, Entanglement, and Violence in Ancient Mediterranean France Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  32. Elson CM, Smith ME. 2001. Archaeological deposits from the Aztec New Fire Ceremony. Anc. Mesoam. 12:157–74 [Google Scholar]
  33. Emerson TE, Pauketat TR. 2008. Historical-processual archaeology and culture making: unpacking the Southern Cult and Mississippian religion. See Whitley & Hays-Gilpin 2008 167–88
  34. Engelke M. 2005. Sticky subjects and sticky objects: the substance of African Christian healing. Materiality D Miller 118–39 Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  35. Engelke M. 2010. Religion and the media turn: a review essay. Am. Ethnol. 37:2371–79 [Google Scholar]
  36. Fogelin L. 2006. Archaeology of Early Buddhism Lanham, MD: Altamira [Google Scholar]
  37. Fogelin L. 2007. The archaeology of religious ritual. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 36:55–71 [Google Scholar]
  38. Fogelin L. 2008. Religion, Archaeology, and the Material World. Carbondale: South. Ill. Univ., Cent. Archaeol. Investig. [Google Scholar]
  39. Foucault M. 1986. Of other spaces. Diacritics 16:22–27 [Google Scholar]
  40. Fowler C. 2011. Personhood and the body. See Insoll 2011 133–50
  41. Fowles SM. 2008. Steps toward an archaeology of taboo. See Fogelin 2008 15–37
  42. Fowles SM. 2013. An Archaeology of Doings: Secularism and the Study of Pueblo Religion Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press [Google Scholar]
  43. Garrow D. 2012. Odd deposits and average practice. A critical history of the concept of structured deposition. Archaeol. Dialogues 19:285–111 [Google Scholar]
  44. Geertz C. 1973. The Interpretation of Culture New York: Basic Books [Google Scholar]
  45. Geertz C. 2005. Shifting aims, moving targets: on the anthropology of religion. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 11:11–15 [Google Scholar]
  46. Gell A. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory Oxford, UK: Clarendon [Google Scholar]
  47. Gerholm T. 1988. On ritual: a postmodernist view. Ethnos 53:190–203 [Google Scholar]
  48. Giddens A. 1984. The Constitution of Society Cambridge, UK: Polity [Google Scholar]
  49. Gilchrist R. 1997. Gender and Material Culture: The Archaeology of Religious Women New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  50. Giles B. 2010. Sacrificing complexity: renewal through Ohio Hopewell rituals. See Alt 2010 73–95
  51. Gillespie SD. 2008. History in practice: ritual depositional practices. See Mills & Walker 2008 109–36
  52. Gonlin N, Lohse JC. 2007. Commoner Ritual and Ideology in Ancient Mesoamerica. Boulder: Univ. Colo. Press [Google Scholar]
  53. Goody J. 1977. Against ritual: Loosely structured thoughts on a loosely defined topic. See Moore & Myerhoff 1977b 25–35
  54. Gosden C. 1994. Social Being and Time Oxford, UK: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  55. Grimes RL. 1990. Ritual Criticism. Case Studies in its Practice, Essay on Its Theory. Columbia: Univ. S.C. Press [Google Scholar]
  56. Haber AF. 2009. Animism, relatedness, life: post-Western perspectives. Camb. Archaeol. J. 19:3418–30 [Google Scholar]
  57. Hallam E, Hockey J. 2001. Death, Memory, and Material Culture Oxford, UK: Berg [Google Scholar]
  58. Hamilakis Y. 2011. Archaeologies of the senses. See Insoll 2011 208–25
  59. Hamilakis Y. 2013. Archaeology and the Senses: Human Experience, Memory, and Affect New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  60. Handelman D. 2004. Why ritual in its own right? How so?. See Handelman & Lindquist 2004 1–34
  61. Handelman D, Lindquist G. 2004. Ritual in Its Own Right New York: Berghahn [Google Scholar]
  62. Harris OJT, Sørensen TF. 2010. Rethinking emotion and material culture. Archaeol. Dialogues 17:2145–63 [Google Scholar]
  63. Hastorf CA. 2007. Archaeological Andean ritual: performance, liturgy, meaning. See Kyriakidis 2007 77–108
  64. Hayden B. 2003. Shamans, Sorcerers, and Saints Washington, DC: Smithson. Books [Google Scholar]
  65. Heckenberger MJ. 2005. The Ecology of Power New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  66. Henn A. 2008. Beyond norm, text, and dialectics: ritual as social praxis. Rituals in an Unstable World: Contingency, Hybridity, Embodiment A Henn, K-P Koepping 9–30 Frankfurt: Lang [Google Scholar]
  67. Hodder I. 2006. The spectacle of daily performance at Çatalhöyük. See Inomata & Coben 2006 81–102
  68. Hodder I. 2010a. Probing religion at Çatalhöyük: an interdisciplinary experiment. See Hodder 2010b 1–31
  69. Hodder I. 2010b. Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  70. Hodder I, Meskell L. 2010. The symbolism of Çatalhöyük in its regional context. See Hodder 2010b 32–72
  71. Hodder I, Pels P. 2010. History houses: a new interpretation of architectural elaboration at Çatalhöyük. See Hodder 2010b 163–86
  72. Højbjerg CK. 2007. Resisting State Iconoclasm Among the Loma of Guinea. Carolina Acad. Ritual Stud. Monogr. Ser Durham, NC: Carolina Acad. Press [Google Scholar]
  73. Houseman M, Severi C. 1998. Naven or the Other Self: A Relational Approach to Ritual Action Leiden, The Neth: Brill [Google Scholar]
  74. Hughes E. 2014. Structured deposition and the interpretation of ritual in the Near Eastern Neolithic: a new methodology PhD Thesis, Univ. Liverpool [Google Scholar]
  75. Hull KL. 2014. Ritual as performance in small scale societies. World Archaeol. 46:2164–77 [Google Scholar]
  76. Humphrey C, Laidlaw J. 1994. The Archetypal Actions of Ritual: A Theory of Ritual Illustrated by the Jain Rite of Worship Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  77. Ingold T. 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling, and Skill London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  78. Inomata T, Coben LS. 2006. Archaeology of Performance: Theaters of Power, Community, and Politics Lanham, MD: Altamira [Google Scholar]
  79. Insoll T. 2004. Archaeology, Ritual, Religion London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  80. Insoll T. 2011. The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Ritual and Religion Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  81. Jones A. 2004. Matter and memory: colour, remembrance, and the Neolithic/Bronze Age transition. See DeMarrais et al. 2004 167–78
  82. Joyce AA, Weller ET. 2007. Commoner rituals, resistance, and the Classic-to-Postclassic transition in ancient Mesoamerica. See Gonlin & Lohse 143–84
  83. Joyce R. 2008. Practice in and as deposition. See Mills & Walker 2008 25–40
  84. Kapferer B. 2004. Ritual dynamics and virtual practice: beyond representation and meaning. See Handelman & Lindquist 2004 35–54
  85. Keane W. 2003. Semiotics and the social analysis of material things. Lang. Commun. 23:409–25 [Google Scholar]
  86. Keane W. 2010. Marked, absent, habitual: approaches to Neolithic religion at Çatalhöyük. See Hodder 2010b 187–219
  87. Kehoe A. 2000. Shamans and Religion: An Anthropological Exploration in Critical Thinking. Long Grove, IL: Waveland [Google Scholar]
  88. Kelly J, Kaplan M. 1990. History, structure, and ritual. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 19:119–50 [Google Scholar]
  89. Kertzer DI. 1989. Ritual, Politics, and Power New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  90. Kidder TR. 2010. Hunter gatherer ritual and complexity: new evidence from Poverty Point, Louisiana. See Alt 2010 32–51
  91. Knappett C. 2011. An Archaeology of Interaction Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  92. Koutrafouri VG, Sanders J. 2013. Introduction. Ritual Failures: Archaeological Perspectives VG Koutrafouri, J Sanders 7–10 Leiden, The Neth: Sidestone [Google Scholar]
  93. Kyriakidis E. 2007. The Archaeology of Ritual Los Angeles: Costen Inst. Archaeol., Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  94. Lambek M. 2000. The anthropology of religion and the quarrel between poetry and philosophy. Curr. Anthropol. 41:3309–20 [Google Scholar]
  95. Lambek M, Boddy J. 2013. A Companion to the Anthropology of Religion Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  96. Leone MP. 2005. The Archaeology of Liberty in an American Capital: Excavations in Annapolis Los Angeles: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  97. Lévi-Strauss C. 1981. The Naked Man New York: Harper & Row [Google Scholar]
  98. Lewis G. 1980. Days of Shining Red: An Essay of Understanding Ritual New York: Cambridge Stud. Soc. Anthropol. [Google Scholar]
  99. Lucero LJ. 2003. The power of ritual: the emergence of Maya Classic rulers. Curr. Anthropol. 44:4523–58 [Google Scholar]
  100. Marcus J. 2007. Rethinking ritual. See Kyriakidis 2007 43–76
  101. Masuzawa T. 2012. The Invention of World Religions, Or how European Universalism was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  102. Matos Moctezuma E. 1995. Life and Death in the Templo Mayor (Mesoamerican Worlds Boulder: Univ. Colo. Press [Google Scholar]
  103. McAnany PC, Wells EC. 2008. Toward a theory of ritual economy. Res. Econ. Anthropol. 27:1–16 [Google Scholar]
  104. McGuire R, Bernbeck R. 2011. Ideology. See Insoll 2011 166–78
  105. McLuhan M. 1966. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man New York: Signet [Google Scholar]
  106. Meskell L. 2004. Divine things. See DeMarrais et al. 2004 249–60
  107. Miller D. 1987. Material Culture and Mass Consumption Malden, MA: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  108. Mills BJ, Walker WH. 2008. Memory Work: Archaeologies of Material Practices Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press [Google Scholar]
  109. Mock S. 1998. The Sowing and the Dawning. Termination, Dedication, and Transformation in the Archaeological and Ethnographic Record of Mesoamerica. Santa Fe: Univ. N.M. Press [Google Scholar]
  110. Moore J. 1996a. The archaeology of plazas and the proxemics of ritual. Am. Anthropol. 98:4789–802 [Google Scholar]
  111. Moore J. 1996b. Architecture and Power in the Ancient Andes: The Archaeology of Public Buildings New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  112. Moore J. 2004. The social basis of sacred space in the prehispanic Andes: ritual of the dead in Chimú and Inka societies. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 11:183–124 [Google Scholar]
  113. Moore SF, Myerhoff B. 1977a. Introduction—secular ritual: forms and meaning. See Moore & Myerhoff 1977b 3–24
  114. Moore SF, Myerhoff B. 1977b. Secular Ritual. Assen, The Neth: Van Gorcum [Google Scholar]
  115. Morley I. 2007. Time, cycles and ritual process. See Barrowclough & Malone 2007 205–9
  116. Morris B. 1987. Anthropological Studies of Religion: An Introductory Text Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  117. Pauketat T. 2013. An Archaeology of the Cosmos: Rethinking Agency and Religion in Ancient America New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  118. Plunket P. 2002. Introduction. Domestic Ritual in Ancient Mesoamerica P Plunket 1–10 Monogr. 46: The Costen Inst. Archaeol Los Angeles: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  119. Pollard J. 2008. Depositional and material agency in the Early Neolithic of Southern Britain.. See Mills & Walker 2008 41–60
  120. Preucel RW. 2010. Archaeological Semiotics Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  121. Price NS. 2008. Bodylore and the archaeology of embedded religion: dramatic license in the funerals of the vikings. See Whitley & Hays-Gillpin 2008 143–67
  122. Rappaport RA. 1999. Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  123. Renfrew C. 1994. The archaeology of religion. The Ancient Mind C Renfrew, EBW Zubrow 47–54 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  124. Renfrew C, Morley I. 2009. Becoming Human: Innovations in Prehistoric Material and Spiritual Culture Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  125. Richards C, Thomas J. 1984. Ritual activity and structured deposition in the Later Neolithic Wessex. Neolithic Studies: A Review of Some Current Research R Bradley, J Gardiner 189–218 Oxford, UK: Br. Archaeol. Rep. 133 [Google Scholar]
  126. Robb J. 2010. Beyond agency. World Archaeol. 42:4493–520 [Google Scholar]
  127. Rowlands M. 2004. The materiality of sacred power. See DeMarrais et al. 2004 197–204
  128. Scarre C, Lawson G. 2006. Archaeoacoustics Cambridge, UK: McDonald Inst. Archaeol. Res. [Google Scholar]
  129. Smith JZ. 1980. The bare facts about ritual. Hist. Relig. 20:112–27 [Google Scholar]
  130. Sugiyama S. 2005. Human Sacrifice, Militarism, and Rulership: Materialization of State Ideology at the Feathered Serpent Pyramid, Teotihuacan Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  131. Swenson ER. 2008. The disjunctive approach to the archaeological analysis of ritual politics. See Fogelin 2008 237–60
  132. Swenson ER. 2010. Revelation and resolution: anthropologies of religion, cognition, and power. Rev. Anthropol. 39:173–200 [Google Scholar]
  133. Swenson ER. 2011. Stagecraft and the politics of spectacle in ancient Peru. Camb. Archaeol. J. 21:2283–313 [Google Scholar]
  134. Swenson ER. 2012. Moche ceremonial architecture as thirdspace: the politics of place-making in the ancient Andes. J. Soc. Archaeol. 12:21–26 [Google Scholar]
  135. Swenson ER. 2013. Interpreting the political landscape of early state religions. See Lambek & Boddy 2013 471–88
  136. Swenson ER. 2015. The materialities of place-making in the ancient Andes: a critical appraisal of the ontological turn in archaeological interpretation. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 22(3):677–712 [Google Scholar]
  137. Swenson ER, Warner JP. 2012. Crucibles of power: forging copper and forging subjects at the Moche ceremonial center of Huaca Colorada, Peru. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 31:3314–33 [Google Scholar]
  138. Swenson ER, Warner JP. 2015. Landscapes of mimesis and convergence and in the Southern Jequetepeque Valley. Camb. Archaeol. J. doi: 10.1017/S09597743150000165 [Google Scholar]
  139. Tambiah SJ. 1979. A Performative Approach to Ritual London: Br. Acad. [Google Scholar]
  140. Tambiah SJ. 1985. Culture, Thought, and Social Action Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  141. Till R. 2014. Sound archaeology: terminology, Palaeolithic cave art and the soundscape. World Archaeol. 46:3292–304 [Google Scholar]
  142. Tilley C. 2004. The Materiality of Stone: Explorations in Landscape Phenomenology 1 Oxford, UK: Berg [Google Scholar]
  143. Tilley C. 2007. Architectural order and the ordering of imagery in Malta and Ireland: a comparative perspective. See Barrowclough & Malone 2007 118–33
  144. Turner V. 1967. The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  145. Turner V. 1969. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  146. Turner V. 1986. Anthropology of Performance New York: Perf. Arts J. [Google Scholar]
  147. Van Dyke R. 2003. Memory and the construction of Chacoan society. See Van Dyke & Alcock 2003 180–200
  148. Van Dyke R, Alcock SE. 2003. Archaeologies of Memory Malden, MA: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  149. Vásquez MA. 2011. More than Belief: A Materialist Theory of Religion Oxford, UK: Oxford. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  150. Verhoeven M. 2002. Ritual and its investigations in prehistory. Magic Practices and Ritual in the Near Eastern Neolithic HGK Gebel, BD Hermansen, CH Jensen 5–40 Berlin: Ex Oriente [Google Scholar]
  151. Verhoeven M. 2011. The many dimensions of ritual. See Insoll 2011 115–32
  152. Walker WH. 1998. Where are the witches of prehistory?. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 5:245–308 [Google Scholar]
  153. Walker WH, Lucero LJ. 2000. The depositional history of ritual and power. Agency in Archaeology MA Dobres, J Robb 130–47 New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  154. Weismantel M. 2013. Inhuman eyes: looking at Chavín de Huantar. Relational Archaeologies: Humans, Animals, Things C Watts 1–20 London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  155. Wells EC, Davis-Salazar KL. 2007. Mesoamerican Ritual Economy: Archaeological and Ethnographic Perspectives Boulder: Univ. Colo. Press [Google Scholar]
  156. Whitehouse H, Hodder I. 2010. Modes of religiosity at Çatalhöyük. See Hodder 2010b 122–45
  157. Whitehouse RD. 2007. “Underground religion revisited.”. See Barrowclough & Malone 2007 97–107
  158. Whitley DS, Hays-Gilpin K. 2008. Belief in the Past: Theoretical Approaches to the Archaeology of Religion Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press [Google Scholar]
  159. Yoffee N. 2005. Myths of the Archaic State Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  160. Zedeño MN. 2008. Bundled worlds: the roles and interactions of complex objects from the North American Plains. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 15:362–78 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-013838
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error