1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Anthropology
  4. Volume 44, 2015
  5. Article

Annual Review of Anthropology

Volume 44, 2015

Resource Transfers and Human Life-History Evolution*

Abstract

Formal models of life-history evolution have been used to illuminate both the peculiarities of the human life cycle and its commonalities with those of other taxa. Understanding reproductive decisions in both the contemporary market-based economies of wealthy nation-states and rapidly changing populations largely of the Global South presents particular challenges to evolutionary life-history theory for several reasons. These include () the rapidity with which reproductive patterns change, () the magnitude of fertility reduction from previous equilibria, and () the frequent absence or even reversal of expected wealth-fertility gradients. These empirical challenges have been met to an increasing extent by specifically incorporating durable wealth and resource transfers into more traditional life-history models. Such relatively new models build on classical life-history theory to generate novel predictions. Among these are quite robust predictions that the existence of heritable wealth will decrease optimal fertility and that, once the system of resource transfers is established, fertility and resource transfers will coevolve.

Keyword(s): demography, evolution, life-history theory, optimality, trade-offs
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-013938
2015-10-21
2025-02-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/anthro/44/1/annurev-anthro-102214-013938.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-013938&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Anderies JM. 1996. An adaptive model for predicting !Kung reproductive performance: a stochastic dynamic programming approach. Ethol. Sociobiol. 17:221–45 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baldini R. 2015. The importance of population growth and regulation in human life history evolution. PLOS ONE 10:e0119789 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bock J. 2002. Evolutionary demography and intrahousehold time allocation: school attendance and child labor among the Okavango Delta Peoples of Botswana. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 14:206–21 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bogin B, Smith BH. 1996. The evolution of human life cycle and life span. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 8:703–16 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bogin B, Smith BH. 2012. Evolution of the human life cycle. Human Biology: An Evolutionary and Biocultural Perspective S Stinson, B Bogin, D O'Rourke 513–86 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  6. Borgerhoff Mulder M. 1998. The demographic transition: Are we any closer to an evolutionary explanation?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:266–70 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bribiescas RG. 2006. Men: Evolutionary and Life History Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  8. Calder WAI. 1984. Size, Function, and Life History Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  9. Caldwell JC. 1982. Theory of Fertility Decline New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
  10. Caswell H. 1982. Optimal life histories and the maximization of reproductive value: a general theorem for complex life cycles. Ecology 63:1218–22 [Google Scholar]
  11. Charlesworth B. 1994. Evolution in Age-Structured Populations New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  12. Charnov EL. 1991. Evolution of life history variation among female mammals. PNAS 88:1134–37 [Google Scholar]
  13. Charnov EL, Schaffer WM. 1973. Life history consequences of natural selection: Cole's result revisited. Am. Nat. 107:791–93 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chu CYC, Lee RD. 2006. The co-evolution of intergenerational transfers and longevity: an optimal life history approach. Theor. Popul. Biol. 69:193–201 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cohen D. 1966. Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment. J. Theor. Biol. 12:119–29 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cohen JE. 1995. How Many People Can the Earth Support? New York: Norton [Google Scholar]
  17. Cole LC. 1954. The population consequences of life history phenomena. Q. Rev. Biol. 29:103–37 [Google Scholar]
  18. Eaton JW, Mayer AJ. 1953. The social biology of very high fertility among the Hutterites: the demography of a unique population. Hum. Biol. 25:206–64 [Google Scholar]
  19. Endler JA. 1986. Natural Selection in the Wild Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  20. Eveleth PB, Tanner JM. 1990. Worldwide Variation in Human Growth Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  21. Fisher RA. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection Oxford, UK: Clarendon [Google Scholar]
  22. Futuyma DJ. 2013. Evolution Sunderland, MA: Sinauer [Google Scholar]
  23. Gadgil M, Bossert WH. 1970. Life historical consequences of natural selection. Am. Nat. 104:1–24 [Google Scholar]
  24. Geronimus AT. 2003. Damned if you do: culture, identity, privilege, and teenage childbearing in the United States. Soc. Sci. Med. 57:881–93 [Google Scholar]
  25. Geronimus AT, Bound J, Waidmann TA. 1999. Health inequality and population variation in fertility-timing. Soc. Sci. Med. 49:1623–36 [Google Scholar]
  26. Gibson MA, Gurmu E. 2011. Land inheritance establishes sibling competition for marriage and reproduction in rural Ethiopia. PNAS 108:2200–4 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gibson MA, Gurmu E. 2012. Rural to urban migration is an unforeseen impact of development intervention in Ethiopia. PLOS ONE 7:e48708 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gibson MA, Lawson DW. 2011. “Modernization” increases parental investment and sibling resource competition: evidence from a rural development initiative in Ethiopia. Evol. Hum. Behav. 32:97–105 [Google Scholar]
  29. Gibson MA, Mace R. 2002. Labor-saving technology and fertility increase in rural Africa. Curr. Anthropol. 43:631–37 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gibson MA, Sear R. 2010. Does wealth increase parental investment biases in child education? Evidence from two African populations on the cusp of the fertility transition. Curr. Anthropol. 51:693–701 [Google Scholar]
  31. Goodman A, Koupil I, Lawson DW. 2012. Low fertility increases descendant socioeconomic position but reduces long-term fitness in a modern post-industrial society. Proc. R. Soc. B 279:4342–51 [Google Scholar]
  32. Gurven M, Kaplan H, Gutierrez M. 2006. How long does it take to become a proficient hunter? Implications for the evolution of extended development and long life span. J. Hum. Evol. 51:454–70 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hamilton WD. 1966. The moulding of senescence by natural selection. J. Theor. Biol. 12:12–45 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hawkes K, O'Connell JF, Jones NGB, Alvarez H, Charnov EL. 1998. Grandmothering, menopause, and the evolution of human life histories. PNAS 95:1336–39 [Google Scholar]
  35. Helle S, Lummaa V, Jokela J. 2004. Selection for increased brood size in historical human populations. Evolution 58:430–36 [Google Scholar]
  36. Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S, Gintis H, Fehr E, Camerer C. 2004. Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence in Fifteen Small-Scale Societies New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  37. Hilborn R, Mangel M. 1997. The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  38. Hill K, Hurtado AM. 1996. Ache Life History: The Ecology and Demography of a Foraging People Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
  39. Hirshfield MF, Tinkle D. 1975. Natural selection and the evolution of reproductive effort. PNAS 72:2227–31 [Google Scholar]
  40. Hopcroft RL. 2006. Sex, status, and reproductive success in the contemporary United States. Evol. Hum. Behav. 27:104–20 [Google Scholar]
  41. Howell N. 1979. The Demography of the Dobe !Kung New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
  42. Hrdy SB. 1999. A History of Mothers, Infants and Natural Selection New York: Pantheon [Google Scholar]
  43. Jones JH. 2009. The force of selection on the human life cycle. Evol. Hum. Behav. 30:305–14 [Google Scholar]
  44. Jones JH. 2011. Primates and the evolution of long, slow life histories. Curr. Biol. 21:R708–17 [Google Scholar]
  45. Jones JH, Bird RB. 2014. The marginal valuation of fertility. Evol. Hum. Behav. 35:65–71 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kaplan HS, Hill KR, Lancaster JB, Hurtado AM. 2000. A theory of human life history evolution: diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evol. Anthropol. 9:156–85 [Google Scholar]
  47. Kaplan HS, Robson AJ. 2002. The emergence of humans: the coevolution of intelligence and longevity with intergenerational transfers. PNAS 99:10221–26 [Google Scholar]
  48. Knott C. 2001. Female reproductive ecology of the apes: implications for human evolution. Reproductive Ecology PT Ellison 299–307 New York: Aldine [Google Scholar]
  49. Korpelainen H. 2003. Human life histories and the demographic transition: a case study from Finland, 1870–1949. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 120:384–90 [Google Scholar]
  50. Kozlowski J, Weiner J. 1997. Interspecific allometries are by-products of body size optimization. Am. Nat. 149:352–80 [Google Scholar]
  51. Kramer KL. 2005. Children's help and the pace of reproduction: cooperative breeding in humans. Evol. Anthropol. 14:224–37 [Google Scholar]
  52. Kramer KL. 2010. Cooperative breeding and its significance to the demographic success of humans. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 39:417–36 [Google Scholar]
  53. Kramer KL, Boone JL. 2002. Why intensive agriculturalists have higher fertility: a household energy budget approach. Curr. Anthropol. 43:511–17 [Google Scholar]
  54. Kramer KL, Ellison PT. 2010. Pooled energy budgets: resituating human energy allocation trade-offs. Evol. Anthropol. 19:136–47 [Google Scholar]
  55. Lack D. 1947. The significance of clutch size. Ibis 89:302–52 [Google Scholar]
  56. Lawson DW, Alvergne A, Gibson MA. 2012. The life-history trade-off between fertility and child survival. Proc. R. Soc. B 279:4755–64 [Google Scholar]
  57. Lawson DW, Mace R. 2008. Sibling configuration and childhood growth in contemporary British families. Int. J. Epidemiol. 37:1408–21 [Google Scholar]
  58. Lawson DW, Mace R. 2009. Trade-offs in modern parenting: a longitudinal study of sibling competition for parental care. Evol. Hum. Behav. 30:170–83 [Google Scholar]
  59. Lawson DW, Mace R. 2010. Optimizing modern family size. Hum. Nat. 21:39–61 [Google Scholar]
  60. Lawson DW, Mace R. 2011. Parental investment and the optimization of human family size. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 366:333–43 [Google Scholar]
  61. Lawson DW, Makoli A, Goodman A. 2013. Sibling configuration predicts individual and descendant socioeconomic success in a modern post-industrial society. PLOS ONE 8:e73698 [Google Scholar]
  62. Lee CT, Puleston CO, Tuljapurkar S. 2009. Population and prehistory III: food-dependent demography in variable environments. Theor. Popul. Biol. 76:179–88 [Google Scholar]
  63. Lee RD. 2003. Rethinking the evolutionary theory of aging: Transfers, not births, shape social species. PNAS 100:9637–42 [Google Scholar]
  64. Lee RD, Kramer KL. 2002. Children's economic roles in the Maya family life cycle: Cain, Caldwell, and Chayanov revisited. Popul. Dev. Rev. 28:475–99 [Google Scholar]
  65. Leonetti DL, Nath DC, Hemam NS. 2007. The behavioral ecology of family planning—two ethnic groups in Northeast India. Hum. Nat. 18:225–41 [Google Scholar]
  66. Lewontin RC. 1965. Selection for colonizing ability. The Genetics of Colonizing Species HG Baker, GL Stebbins 77–94 New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
  67. Lewontin RC, Cohen D. 1969. On population growth in a randomly varying environment. PNAS 62:1056–60 [Google Scholar]
  68. Mace R. 1990. Pastoralist herd compositions in unpredictable environments: a comparison of model predictions and data from camel-keeping groups. Agric. Syst. 33:1–11 [Google Scholar]
  69. Mace R. 1998. The co-evolution of human fertility and wealth inheritance. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 353:389–97 [Google Scholar]
  70. Mace R. 2008. Reproducing in cities. Science 319:764–66 [Google Scholar]
  71. Mace R. 2013. The cost of children. Nature 499:32–33 [Google Scholar]
  72. Mace R. 2014. When not to have another baby: an evolutionary approach to low fertility. Demogr. Res. 30:1074–96 [Google Scholar]
  73. Mace R, Colleran H. 2009. Kin influence on the decision to start using modern contraception: a longitudinal study from rural Gambia. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 21:472–77 [Google Scholar]
  74. Marlowe FW. 2005. Hunter-gatherers and human evolution. Evol. Anthropol. 14:54–67 [Google Scholar]
  75. Murphy GI. 1968. Pattern of life history and the environment. Am. Nat. 102:390–404 [Google Scholar]
  76. Neill DB. 2010. Expanding opportunity structures. Hum. Nat. 21:165–85 [Google Scholar]
  77. Nettle D. 2010. Dying young and living fast: variation in life history across English neighborhoods. Behav. Ecol. 21:387–95 [Google Scholar]
  78. Nettle D. 2011. Flexibility in reproductive timing in human females: integrating ultimate and proximate explanations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 366:357–65 [Google Scholar]
  79. Nettle D, Pollet TV. 2008. Natural selection on male wealth in humans. Am. Nat. 172:658–66 [Google Scholar]
  80. Öberg S. 2015. Sibship size and height before, during, and after the fertility decline: a test of the resource dilution hypothesis. Demogr. Res. 32:29–74 [Google Scholar]
  81. Orzack SH, Tuljapurkar S. 1989. Population dynamics in variable environments. VII. Demography and evolution of iteroparity. Am. Nat. 133:901–23 [Google Scholar]
  82. Purvis A, Harvey PH. 1995. Mammal life-history evolution: a comparative test of Charnov's model. J. Zool. 237:259–83 [Google Scholar]
  83. Quinlan RJ, Flinn MV. 2005. Kinship, sex, and fitness in a Caribbean community. Hum. Nat. 16:32–57 [Google Scholar]
  84. Quinlan RJ, Quinlan MB, Flinn MV. 2003. Parental investment and age at weaning in a Caribbean village. Evol. Hum. Behav. 24:1–16 [Google Scholar]
  85. Rogers AR. 1994. Evolution of time preference by natural-selection. Am. Econ. Rev. 84:460–81 [Google Scholar]
  86. Schaffer WM. 1974a. Optimal reproductive effort in fluctuating environments. Am. Nat. 108:783–90 [Google Scholar]
  87. Schaffer WM. 1974b. Selection for optimal life histories: the effects of age structure. Ecology 55:291–303 [Google Scholar]
  88. Schaffer WM. 1983. The application of optimal control theory to the general life history problem. Am. Nat. 121:418–31 [Google Scholar]
  89. Schmidt-Nielsen K. 1984. Scaling: Why Is Animal Size So Important? New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  90. Schultz TW. 1961. Investment in human capital. Am. Econ. Rev. 51:1–17 [Google Scholar]
  91. Sear R, Coall D. 2011. How much does family matter? Cooperative breeding and the demographic transition. Popul. Dev. Rev. 37:81–112 [Google Scholar]
  92. Shenk MK. 2004. Embodied capital and heritable wealth in complex cultures: a class-based analysis of parental investment in urban South India. Socioeconomic Aspects of Human Behavioral Ecology MS Alvard 307–33 Bingley, UK: Emerald Group [Google Scholar]
  93. Shenk MK. 2009. Testing three evolutionary models of the demographic transition: patterns of fertility and age at marriage in Urban South India. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 21:501–11 [Google Scholar]
  94. Shenk MK, Towner MC, Kress HC, Alam N. 2013. A model comparison approach shows stronger support for economic models of fertility decline. PNAS 110:8045–50 [Google Scholar]
  95. Slatkin M. 1974. Hedging one's evolutionary bets. Nature 250:704–5 [Google Scholar]
  96. Smith CC, Fretwell SD. 1974. The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am. Nat. 108:499–506 [Google Scholar]
  97. Snopkowski K, Sear R. 2013. Kin influences on fertility in Thailand: effects and mechanisms. Evol. Hum. Behav. 34:130–38 [Google Scholar]
  98. Towner MC. 1999. A dynamic model of human dispersal in a land-based economy. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46:82–94 [Google Scholar]
  99. Towner MC. 2001. Linking dispersal and resources in humans—life history data from Oakham, Massachusetts (1750–1850). Hum. Nat. 12:321–49 [Google Scholar]
  100. Towner MC. 2002. Linking dispersal and marriage in humans—life history data from Oakham, Massachusetts, USA (1750–1850). Evol. Hum. Behav. 23:337–57 [Google Scholar]
  101. Tuljapurkar S. 1990. Population Dynamics in Variable Environments Berlin: Springer-Veralg [Google Scholar]
  102. Tuljapurkar S, Orzack SH. 1980. Population dynamics in variable environments. I. Long-run growth rates and extinction. Theor. Popul. Biol. 18:314–42 [Google Scholar]
  103. Voland E, Dunbar RIM. 1995. Resource competition and reproduction. Hum. Nat. 6:33–49 [Google Scholar]
  104. Williams GC. 1957. Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 11:398–411 [Google Scholar]
  105. Williams GC. 1966a. Adaptation and Natural Selection Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  106. Williams GC. 1966b. Natural selection, the cost of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack's principle. Am. Nat. 100:687–90 [Google Scholar]
  107. Wilson M, Daly M. 1997. Life expectancy, economic inequality, homicide, and reproductive timing in Chicago neighbourhoods. BMJ 314:1271–74 [Google Scholar]
  108. Wood JW. 1994. Dynamics of Human Reproduction: Biology, Biometry, Demography New York: Aldine de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-013938
Loading
Resource Transfers and Human Life-History Evolution*
Annual Review of Anthropology 44, 513 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-013938
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-013938
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-013938
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error