1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Anthropology
  4. Volume 44, 2015
  5. Article

Annual Review of Anthropology

Volume 44, 2015

Embodiment in Human Communication

Abstract

This article defines the present moment in the anthropology of embodied human communication as a moment of possible fusion between () the new conception of the living human body emerging in biology, cognitive science and neuroscience, and sociology and anthropology and () the advanced methodology and research on social interaction in the “interactionist” tradition, which is reinterpreted here as a study of socialized practices for interacting in, and inhabiting, the world with others. A growing number of studies of interaction are now focused on “multimodal” communication in complex material settings. The convergence of research programs is illustrated here by sociological research on dance and sports, by a practice-based approach to gesture, and by a selective overview of recent studies of multimodality. Particular attention is given to two influential theoretical programs, one by E. Hutchins and the other by C. Goodwin.

Keyword(s): embodiment, gesture, interaction, phenomenology, practice
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014045
2015-10-21
2025-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/anthro/44/1/annurev-anthro-102214-014045.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014045&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Alkemeyer T. 2004. Bewegung und Gesellschaft. Zur “Verkörperung” des Sozialen und zur Formung des Selbst in Sport und populärer Kultur. Bewegung: Sozial- und kulturwissenschaftliche Konzepte G Klein 43–78 Bielefeld, Ger.: Transcript [Google Scholar]
  2. Alkemeyer T, Brümmer K, Kodalle R, Pille T. 2009. Ordnung in Bewegung: Choreographien des Sozialen. Körper in Sport, Tanz, Arbeit und Bildung. Bielefeld, Ger.: Transcript [Google Scholar]
  3. Andrén M. 2010. Children's Gestures from 18 to 30 Months. Trav. Inst. Linguist. Lund Ser. 50 Lund, Swed.: Lund Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  4. Austin J. 1962. How To Do Things with Words Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  5. Bateson G. 1956. The message ‘this is play.’. Group Processes: Transactions of the Second Conference B Schaffner 145–242 New York: Josia Macy Jr. Found. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bateson G. 1958 (1936). Naven Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bateson G. 1971. Communication. The Natural History of an Interview 95 N McQuown 1–40 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Libr. (Microfiche) [Google Scholar]
  8. Bateson G. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind New York: Ballantine [Google Scholar]
  9. Becvar LA, Hollan J, Hutchins E. 2005. Hands as molecules: representational gestures used for developing theory in a scientific laboratory. Semiotica 156:89–112 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bourdieu P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  11. Bourdieu P. 1990. The Logic of Practice Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  12. Brentano F. 1995. Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  13. Button G. 1993. Technology in Working Order: Studies of Work, Interaction, and Technology London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  14. Cooperrider K, Nuñez R. 2009. Across time, across the body: transversal temporal gestures. Gesture 9:2181–206 [Google Scholar]
  15. Csordas TI. 1990. Embodiment as a paradigm for anthropology. Ethos 18:5–47 [Google Scholar]
  16. De Jaegher H, Di Paolo E. 2007. Participatory sense-making: an enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 6:485–507 [Google Scholar]
  17. Deleuze G. 2003. Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press [Google Scholar]
  18. Deppermann A, Günthner S. 2015. Temporality in Interaction Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Google Scholar]
  19. Descola P. 2014. All too human (still). HAU 4:2267–73 [Google Scholar]
  20. Douglas M. 1970. Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology. London: Barrie & Jenkins [Google Scholar]
  21. Dreyfus HL. 1991. Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  22. Dreyfus HL. 2002. Intelligence without representation—Merleau-Ponty's critique of mental representation. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 1:367–83 [Google Scholar]
  23. Edwards T. 2012. Sensing the rhythms of everyday life: temporal integration and tactile translation in the Seattle deaf-blind community. Lang. Soc. 41:29–71 [Google Scholar]
  24. Elias N. 2009 (1970). Was ist Soziologie? Weinheim, Ger.: Juventa [Google Scholar]
  25. Elsner M. 2000. Das vierbeinige Tier: Bewegungsdialog und Diskurs des Tango Argentino. Frankfurt: Lang [Google Scholar]
  26. Enfield NJ. 2001. ‘Lip-pointing’: a discussion of form and function with reference to data from Laos. Gesture 1:2185–212 [Google Scholar]
  27. Enfield NJ. 2003. Producing and editing gestural diagrams using co-speech gesture: spatializing non-spatial relations in explanations of kinship in Laos. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 13:7–50 [Google Scholar]
  28. Enfield NJ. 2005. The body as a cognitive artifact in kinship representations. Curr. Anthropol. 46:51–81 [Google Scholar]
  29. Engeström Y, Middleton D. 1996. Cognition and Communication at Work Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  30. Flusser V. 2014. Gestures Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press [Google Scholar]
  31. Freedman N. 1977. Hand, word, and mind: on the structuralization of body movement and the capacity for verbal representation. Communicative Structures and Psychic Structures: A Psychoanalytic Interpretation of Communication N Freedman, S Grand New York: Plenum [Google Scholar]
  32. Fuchs T, De Jaeger H. 2009. Enactive intersubjectivity: participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 8:465–86 [Google Scholar]
  33. Garfinkel H, Sacks H. 1970. On formal structures of practical actions. Theoretical Sociology JC McKinney, EA Tiryakian 338–66 New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts [Google Scholar]
  34. Gibson JJ. 1966. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems Boston: Houghton Mifflin [Google Scholar]
  35. Gibson JJ. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
  36. Goffman E. 1963. Behavior in Public Places New York: Free Press [Google Scholar]
  37. Goffman E. 1971. Relations in Public. Microstudies of the Public Order New York: Basic Books [Google Scholar]
  38. Goodwin C. 1979. The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology G Psathas 97–121 New York: Irvington [Google Scholar]
  39. Goodwin C. 1981. Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
  40. Goodwin C. 1986. Gesture as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation. Semiotica 62:1–229–49 [Google Scholar]
  41. Goodwin C. 1994. Professional vision. Am. Anthropol. 96:3606–33 [Google Scholar]
  42. Goodwin C. 1995. The social life of aphasia Presented at Conversat. Symp., Albuquerque, NM [Google Scholar]
  43. Goodwin C. 2000. Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. J. Pragmat. 32:1489–522 [Google Scholar]
  44. Goodwin C. 2003. Pointing as situated practice. See Kita 2003 217–42
  45. Goodwin C. 2004. A competent speaker who can't speak: the social life of aphasia. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 14:2151–70 [Google Scholar]
  46. Goodwin C. 2007a. Environmentally coupled gestures. Gesture and the Dynamic Dimension of Language: Essays in Honor of David McNeill SD Duncan, J Cassell, ET Levy 195–212 Philadelphia: John Benjamins [Google Scholar]
  47. Goodwin C. 2007b. Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse Soc. 18:53–73 [Google Scholar]
  48. Goodwin C. 2011. Contextures of action. See Streeck et al. 2011 182–93
  49. Goodwin C. 2012. The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. J. Pragmat. 46:8–23 [Google Scholar]
  50. Goodwin C, Goodwin M. 1996. Seeing as situated activity: formulating planes. See Engeström & Middleton 1996 61–95
  51. Goodwin C, Goodwin MH. 1992. Context, activity, and participation. The Contextualization of Language P Auer, A DiLuzio 77–100 Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Google Scholar]
  52. Goodwin MH. 2015. Haptic sociality: the embodied interactive constitution of intimacy through touch and voice. See Meyer et al. 2015. In press
  53. Goodwin MH, Cekaite A, Goodwin C. 2012. Emotion as stance. See Peräkylä & Sorjonen 2012 16–41
  54. Gordon PF. 2014. Heidegger in black. N. Y. Rev. Books Oct. 9 [Google Scholar]
  55. Haddington P, Mondada L, Nevile M. 2013. Interaction and Mobility. Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
  56. Haller M. 2009. Bewegte Ordnungen: Kontingenz und Intersubjektivität im Tango Argentino. See Alkemeyer et al. 2009 91–106
  57. Hanks WF. 2005. Pierre Bourdieu and the practices of language. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 34:67–83 [Google Scholar]
  58. Hausendorf H, Mondada L, Schmitt R. 2013. Raum als interaktive Ressource Tübingen, Ger.: Narr [Google Scholar]
  59. Haviland JB. 1993. Anchoring, iconicity, and orientation in Guugu Yimidhirr pointing gestures. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 3:3–45 [Google Scholar]
  60. Haviland JB. 2003. How to point in Zinancantan. See Kita 2003 39–70
  61. Haviland JB. 2013. The emerging grammar of nouns in a first generation sign language: specification, iconicity, and syntax. Gesture 13:3309–53 [Google Scholar]
  62. Heath C. 1982. The display of recipiency: an instance of a sequential relationship in speech and body movement. Semiotica 42:2–4147–67 [Google Scholar]
  63. Heath C. 1986. Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  64. Heath C, Luff P. 1993. Disembodied conduct: interactional assymetries in video-mediated communication. See Button 1993 35–54
  65. Heath C, Luff P. 1996. Convergent activity: line control and passenger information on the London Underground. See Engeström & Middleton 1996 96–129
  66. Heath C, Luff P. 2012. Embodied action and organizational activity. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis J Sidnell, T Stivers 283–307 Chichester, UK: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  67. Heidegger M. 1962 (1926). Being and Time New York: Harper & Row [Google Scholar]
  68. Heidegger M. 1928/1929. Einleitung in die Philosophie 27 Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann [Google Scholar]
  69. Hockey J, Collinson JA. 2007. Grasping the phenomenology of sporting bodies. Int. Rev. Sociol. Sport 42:2115–31 [Google Scholar]
  70. Humboldt Wv. 1988 (1836). On Language Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  71. Husserl E. 2012 (1913). Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology Hoboken, NJ: Taylor & Francis [Google Scholar]
  72. Hutchins E. 1995. Cognition in the Wild Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  73. Hutchins E. 2005. Material anchors for conceptual blends. J. Pragmat. 37:1555–77 [Google Scholar]
  74. Hutchins E. 2006. The distributed cognition perspective on human interaction. Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction SC Levinson, NJ Enfield 375–98 London: Berg [Google Scholar]
  75. Hutchins E, Johnson CM. 2009. Modeling the emergence of language as an embodied collective cognitive activity. Top. Cogn. Sci. 1:523–46 [Google Scholar]
  76. Hutchins E, Nomura S. 2011. Collaborative construction of multimodal utterances. See Streeck et al. 2011 289–304
  77. Hutchins E, Palen L. 1997. Constructing meaning from space, gesture, and speech. Discourse, Tools, and Reasoning L Resnick, R Säljö, C Pontecorvo, B Burge 23–40 New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  78. Ingold T. 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  79. Ingold T. 2004. Culture on the ground: the world perceived through the feet. J. Mater. Cult. 9:315–40 [Google Scholar]
  80. Ingold T. 2011. Being Alive. Essays on Movement, Knowledge, and Description London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  81. Iwasaki S. 2011. The multimodal mechanics of collaborative unit construction in Japanese conversation. See Streeck et al. 2011 106–21
  82. Jackson M. 1989. Paths Toward a Clearing: Radical Empricism and Ethnographic Inquiry. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  83. Jeannerod M. 2006. Motor Cognition: What Actions Tell the Self. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  84. Joas H. 1996. The Creativity of Action Cambridge, UK: Polity [Google Scholar]
  85. Keating E, Sunakawa C. 2011. ‘A full inspiration tray’: multimodality across real and virtual spaces. See Streeck et al. 2011 194–206
  86. Keenan EL, Comrie B. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguist. Inq. 8:63–99 [Google Scholar]
  87. Keevalik L. 2015. Coordinating the temporalities of talk and dance. Temporalities in Interaction A Deppermann, S Günthner 309–35 Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Google Scholar]
  88. Kendon A. 1967. Some functions of gaze direction in two-person conversation. Acta Psychol. 26:22–63 [Google Scholar]
  89. Kendon A. 1972. Some relationships between body motion and speech. Studies in Dyadic Communication A Seigmann 177–210 Elmsford, NY: Pergamon [Google Scholar]
  90. Kendon A. 1981. The organization of behavior in face-to-face interaction: observations on the development of a methodology. Handbook of Research Methods in Nonverbal Behavior P Ekman, KR Scherer 440–505 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  91. Kendon A. 1990. Conducting Interaction Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  92. Kendon A. 2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  93. Kendon A. 2009. Manual actions, speech and the nature of language. Origine e sviluppo del linguaggio, fra teoria e storia. Atti del 15 congresso della società di filosofia del linguaggio (Cosenza, 15–17 settembre 2008) D Gambarara, A Givigliano 19–33 Rome: Aracne Ed. [Google Scholar]
  94. Kendon A, Versante L. 2003. Pointing by hand in “Neapolitan.”. See Kita 2003 109–38
  95. Kita S. 2003. Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
  96. Kockelman P. 2006. Residence in the world: affordances, instruments, actions, roles, and identities. Semiotica 162:19–71 [Google Scholar]
  97. Kohn E. 2013. How Forests Think Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  98. Koschmann T, LeBaron CD, Goodwin C, Zemel A, Dunnington G. 2007. Formulating the triangle of doom. Gesture 7:97–117 [Google Scholar]
  99. Latour B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  100. LeBaron C, Streeck J. 1997. Built space and the interactional framing of experience during a murder interrogation. Hum. Stud. 20:1–25 [Google Scholar]
  101. Leeds-Hurwitz W. 1987. The social history of The Natural History of an Interview: a multidisciplinary investigation of social communication. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 20:1–51 [Google Scholar]
  102. Leroi-Gourhan A. 1993 (1964). Gesture and Speech Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  103. Levinson SC, Wilkins D. 2006. Grammars of Space Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  104. Lipset D. 1980. Gregory Bateson. The Legacy of a Scientist. Boston, MA: Beacon [Google Scholar]
  105. Llinas RR. 2001. I of the Vortex. From Neurons to Self Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  106. Loula F, Prasad S, Harber K, Shiffrar M. 2005. Recognizing people from their movement. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 31:210–20 [Google Scholar]
  107. Marx K. 1973. Grundrisse Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin [Google Scholar]
  108. Markula P. 2006. Foucault, Sport and Exercise: Power, Knowledge and Transforming the Self London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  109. Maturana HR, Varela FJ. 1980. Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living Dordrecht, The Neth.: Reidel [Google Scholar]
  110. Mauss M. 1973 (1935). The techniques of the body. Econ. Soc. 2:70–88 [Google Scholar]
  111. McDermott R, Gospodinoff K, Aron J. 1978. Criteria for an ethnographically adequate description of concerted activities and their contexts. Semiotica 24:3/4245–76 [Google Scholar]
  112. McNeill D. 1992. Hand and Mind. What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  113. McNeill D. 2005. Gesture and Thought Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  114. Mead GH. 1909. Social psychology as a counterpart to physiological psychology. Psychol. Bull. 6:401–8 [Google Scholar]
  115. Mead GH. 1932. Philosophy of the Act Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  116. Mead GH. 1934. Mind, Self and Society Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  117. Merleau-Ponty M. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  118. Merleau-Ponty M. 1994. The philosopher and his shadow. Signs M Merleau-Ponty 159–81 Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  119. Meyer C, Streeck J, Jordan JS. 2015. Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press In press [Google Scholar]
  120. Meyer C, von Wedelstaedt U. 2015. Enactive intercorporeality in sports. Enactive Intercorporeality: The Coordination, Concertation and Collectivization of Moving Bodies in Sports C Meyer, U von Wedelstaedt Amsterdam: John Benjamins In press [Google Scholar]
  121. Mitchell R. 2013. Movement orders and their bodies. The lived bodies of ballet and Taijiquan. Presented at Mainzer Sympos. Soz. Kulturwissensch., Pract. Bodies “What Kind of Artefact is the Lived Body?” 2nd, Mainz, Ger. [Google Scholar]
  122. Mondada L. 2009. Emergent focused interactions in public places: a systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space. J. Pragmat. 41:1977–97 [Google Scholar]
  123. Mondada L. 2011. The organization of concurrent courses of action in surgical demonstrations. See Streeck et al. 2011 207–26
  124. Mondada L. 2012. Talking and driving: multiactivity in the car. Semiotica 191/192:233–56 [Google Scholar]
  125. Müller C. 1998. Iconicity and gesture. Oralite et Gestualite S Santi, I Guaitella, C Cave, G Konopczynski 321–28 Paris: L'Harmattan [Google Scholar]
  126. Müller C, Cienki A, Fricke E, Ladewig SH, McNeill D, Bressem J. 2013. Body – Language – Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (Handb. Linguist. Commun. Sci. 38.2) Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
  127. Murphy KM. 2005. Collaborative imagining: the interactive uses of gestures, talk, and graphic representation in architectural practice. Semiotica 156:113–45 [Google Scholar]
  128. Murphy KM. 2011. Building stories: the embodied narration of what might come to pass. See Streeck et al. 2011 243–53
  129. Napier J. 1980. Hands New York: Pantheon [Google Scholar]
  130. Nevile M. 2004. Beyond the Black Box: Talk-in-Interaction in the Airline Cockpit Aldershot, UK: Ashgate [Google Scholar]
  131. Noland C. 2009. Agency and Embodiment. Performing Gestures/Producing Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  132. Nuñez R, Sweetser E. 2006. With the future behind them: convergent evidence from language and gesture in the cross-linguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cogn. Sci. 30:401–50 [Google Scholar]
  133. Peräkylä A, Sorjonen M-L. 2012. Emotion in Interaction Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  134. Rossano F. 2012. Gaze behavior in face-to-face interaction PhD Thesis, Max-Planck Inst. Psycholinguist., Nijmegen [Google Scholar]
  135. Sacks H, Schegloff EA, Jefferson G. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50:696–735 [Google Scholar]
  136. Schatzki TR, Knorr Cetina K, von Savigny E. 2001. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  137. Scheflen AE. 1964. The significance of posture in communication systems. Psychiatry 27:4316–31 [Google Scholar]
  138. Scheflen AE. 1973. Communicational Structure Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  139. Schegloff EA. 1984. On some gestures' relation to talk. Structures of Social Action JM Atkinson, J Heritage 266–95 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  140. Schutz A. 1967 (1932). The Phenomenology of the Social World Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  141. Schutz A. 1982. Collected Papers 1–3 The Hague: Martinus Nijhof [Google Scholar]
  142. Sheets-Johnstone. 2010. Thinking in movement: further analyses and validations. See Stewart et al. 2010 165–81
  143. Sheets-Johnstone M. 2012. The Primacy of Movement Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  144. Slobin DI. 1987. Thinking for speaking. Proc. Annu. Meet. Berkeley Linguist. Soc.435–45 Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  145. Stewart J, Gapenne O, Di Paolo E. 2010. Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  146. Streeck J. 1993. Gesture as communication I: its coordination with gaze and speech. Commun. Monogr. 60:275–99 [Google Scholar]
  147. Streeck J. 1995. On projection. Social Intelligence and Interaction E Goody 87–110 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  148. Streeck J. 1996. How to do things with things: objets trouvés and symbolization. Hum. Stud. 19:365–84 [Google Scholar]
  149. Streeck J. 2002. A body and its gestures. Gesture 2:19–44 [Google Scholar]
  150. Streeck J. 2007. Homo faber's gestures. Review article on A. Kendon, Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 17:130–40 [Google Scholar]
  151. Streeck J. 2008. Depicting by gestures. Gesture 8:3285–301 [Google Scholar]
  152. Streeck J. 2009a. Forward-gesturing. Discourse Process. 45:3/4161–79 [Google Scholar]
  153. Streeck J. 2009b. Gesturecraft: The Manufacture of Meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Google Scholar]
  154. Streeck J. 2013. Interaction and the living body. J. Pragmat. 46:69–90 [Google Scholar]
  155. Streeck J, Goodwin C, LeBaron C. 2011. Embodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  156. Streeck J, Kallmeyer W. 2001. Interaction by inscription. J. Pragmat. 33:4465–90 [Google Scholar]
  157. Thompson E. 2007. Mind in Life Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  158. Trevarthen C. 1998. The concept and foundations of infant intersubjectivity. Intersubjective Communication and Emotion in Early Ontogeny S Braten 15–46 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  159. Tulbert E, Goodwin MH. 2011. Choreographies of attention: multimodality in a routine family activity. See Streeck et al. 2011 79–92
  160. Uexküll Jv. 1957. A stroll through the worlds of animals an men: a picture book of invisible worlds. Instinctive Behavior: The Development of a Modern Concept CH Schiller New York: Int. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  161. Varela FJ, Thompson E, Rosch E. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  162. Wacquant L. 2004. Body and Soul. Notebooks of an Apprentice Boxer. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  163. Wilkins D. 2003. Why pointing with the index finger is not a universal (in sociocultural and semiotic terms). See Kita 2003 171–216
  164. Wolpert DM, Miall C. 1996. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw. 9:81265–79 [Google Scholar]
  165. Zemel A, Koschmann T, LeBaron C. 2011. Pursuing a response: prodding recognition and expertise within a surgical team. See Streeck et al. 2011 227–42
  166. Ziemke T, Zlatev J, Roslyn MF. 2007. Body, Language and Mind 1 Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014045
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error