1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Anthropology
  4. Volume 44, 2015
  5. Article

Annual Review of Anthropology

Volume 44, 2015

Urban Political Ecology*

Abstract

As urban environments transform across the globe, debates over urban nature and its future forms have introduced important critical questions. How, for instance, do we study emergent, dynamic configurations of nature and culture in cities? How do we conceptualize the city as a field site when urbanization encompasses the full spatial continuum from city to countryside? How do we understand the place of history in an environmental era often categorized as unprecedented? This article traces political ecology from its noncity origins to its present engagements with urban life and forms. It argues that ethnographic work both enriches and complicates recent debates about the urban past, present, and future, and it calls for more vigorous and refined anthropological engagement with the biophysical sciences, the theoretical and methodological challenges of scale, and the work of historical contextualization in the history-evasive era now widely known as the Anthropocene.

Keyword(s): city, ecosystem, nature, urbanization
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014208
2015-10-21
2025-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/anthro/44/1/annurev-anthro-102214-014208.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014208&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abrams P. 1982. Historical Sociology Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  2. Agrawal A. 2005. Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  3. Alley K. 2002. On the Banks of the Ganga: When Wastewater Meets a Sacred River Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press [Google Scholar]
  4. Anand N. 2011. Pressure: the politechnics of water supply in Mumbai. Cult. Anthropol. 26:542–64 [Google Scholar]
  5. Anand N. 2012. Municipal disconnect: on abject water and its urban infrastructures. Ethnography 13:487–509 [Google Scholar]
  6. Anand N. 2015. Leaky states: water audits, infrastructure and the politics of infrastructure. Public Cult. 27:2305–30 [Google Scholar]
  7. Angelo H, Wachsmuth D. 2014. Urbanizing urban political ecology: a critique of methodological cityism. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 39:16–27 [Google Scholar]
  8. Anjaria JS. 2009. Guardians of the bourgeois city: citizenship, public space, and middle-class activism in Mumbai. City Commun. 8:391–406 [Google Scholar]
  9. Appadurai A. 1996. Modernity at Large Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press [Google Scholar]
  10. Arnold D, Guha R. 1995. Nature, Culture, Imperialism: Essays on the Environmental History of South Asia Delhi: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  11. Auyero J, Swistun D. 2009. Flammable: Environmental Suffering in an Argentine Shantytown Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  12. Baviskar A. 1995. In the Belly of the River: Tribal Conflicts over Development in the Narmada Valley New Delhi: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  13. Baviskar A. 2003a. Between violence and desire: space, power, and identity in the making of metropolitan Delhi. Int. Soc. Sci. J. 55:89–98 [Google Scholar]
  14. Baviskar A. 2003b. For a cultural politics of natural resources. Econ. Polit. Wkly. 28:5051–55 [Google Scholar]
  15. Baviskar A. 2004. Waterlines: The Penguin Book of River Writings Delhi: Penguin [Google Scholar]
  16. Benton T. 1989. Marxism and natural limits: an ecological critique and reconstruction. New Left Rev. 178:51–86 [Google Scholar]
  17. Blaikie P. 1985. The Political Economy of Soil Erosion in Developing Countries New York: Longman [Google Scholar]
  18. Blaikie P, Brookfield H. 1987. Land Degradation and Society London: Methuen [Google Scholar]
  19. Bocking S. 2004. Nature's Experts: Science, Politics, and the Environment New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  20. Braun B. 2005. Environmental issues: writing a more-than-human urban geography. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 29.5:635–50 [Google Scholar]
  21. Brenner N. 2014. Implosions/Explosions: Toward a Study of Planetary Urbanization Berlin: Jovis [Google Scholar]
  22. Brookfield H. 1999. A review of political ecology: issues, epistemology, and analytical narratives. Z. Wirtschaftsgeogr.131–47 [Google Scholar]
  23. Brosius JP. 1999a. Comments on Escobar's “after nature: steps to an antiessentialist political ecology.”. Curr. Anthropol. 40:16–17 [Google Scholar]
  24. Brosius JP. 1999b. Green dots, pink hearts: displacing politics from the Malaysian rain forest. Am. Anthropol. 101:36–57 [Google Scholar]
  25. Brosius JP, Russell D. 2003. Conservation from above: an anthropological perspective on transboundary protected areas and ecoregional planning. J. Sustain. For. 17:39–65 [Google Scholar]
  26. Brosius JP, Tsing A, Zerner C. 2005. Communities and Conservation: Histories and Politics of Community-Based Natural Resource Management Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira [Google Scholar]
  27. Bryant RL. 1992. Political ecology: an emerging research agenda in third world studies. Polit. Geogr. 11:12–36 [Google Scholar]
  28. Bryant RL. 1998. Power, knowledge, and political ecology in the third world. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 22:79–94 [Google Scholar]
  29. Bryant RL, Bailey S. 1997. Third World Political Ecology London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  30. Caldeira T. 2001. City of Walls: Crime, Segregation, and Citizenship in São Paulo Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  31. Callon M. 1998. The Laws of the Markets Oxford, UK: Blackwell/Sociol. Rev. [Google Scholar]
  32. Callon M. 2009. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. Power, Action, Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? J Law 196–223 New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  33. Castells M. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture 1 Cambridge, MA/Oxford, UK: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  34. Castree N, Braun B. 2001. Social Nature: Theory, Practice, and Politics New York: Wiley-Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  35. Chakrabarty D. 2002. Of garbage, modernity and the citizen's gaze. Habitations of Modernity: Essays in the Wake of Subaltern Studies D Chakrabarty 65–79 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  36. Chakrabarty D. 2009. The climate of history: four theses. Crit. Inq. 35:197–222 [Google Scholar]
  37. Chatterjee P. 2004. The Politics of the Governed: Reflections on Popular Politics in Most of the World New York: Columbia Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  38. Choy T. 2011. Ecologies of Comparison: An Ethnography of Endangerment in Hong Kong Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  39. Cohelo K, Raman NV. 2013. From the frying pan to the floodplain: negotiating land, water, and fire in Chennai's development. See Rademacher & Sivaramakrishnan 2013 145–68
  40. Cronon W. 1983. Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists, and the Ecology of New England New York: Hill & Wang [Google Scholar]
  41. Cronon W. 1991. Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West New York: Norton [Google Scholar]
  42. Cronon W. 1995. The trouble with wilderness; or, getting back to the wrong nature. Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature W Cronon 69–90 New York: Norton [Google Scholar]
  43. Davilla A. 2004. Barrio Dreams: Puerto Ricans, Latinos, and the Neoliberal City Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  44. Davis D. 2000. The Consumer Revolution in Urban China Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  45. Demeritt D. 1994. The nature of metaphors in cultural geography and environmental history. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 18:163–85 [Google Scholar]
  46. Doshi S. 2013. Resettlement ecologies: environmental subjectivity and graduated citizenship in Mumbai. See Rademacher & Sivaramakrishnan 2013 225–48
  47. Dove M. 1991. Anthropology of development versus development anthropology: mediating the forester-farmer relationship in Pakistan. Pract. Anthropol. 13:21–25 [Google Scholar]
  48. Escobar A. 1996. Constructing nature: elements for a poststructuralist political ecology. See Peet & Watts 1996 46–68
  49. Escobar A. 1998. Whose knowledge, whose nature? Biodiversity, conservation, and the political ecology of social movements. J. Polit. Ecol. 4:53–82 [Google Scholar]
  50. Escobar A. 1999. After nature: steps to an antiessentialist political ecology. Curr. Anthropol. 40:16–17 [Google Scholar]
  51. Fairhead J, Leach M. 1996. Misreading the African Landscape: Society and Ecology in Forest-Savanna Mosaic Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  52. Ferguson J. 1994. The Anti-Politics Machine: Development, Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press [Google Scholar]
  53. Ferguson J. 1999. Expectations of Modernity: Myths and Meanings of Urban Life on the Zambian Copperbelt. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  54. Fischer MJ. 2007. Four genealogies for a recombinant anthropology of science and technology. Cult. Anthropol. 22:539–615 [Google Scholar]
  55. Forsyth T. 2003. Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  56. Franklin S. 1995. Science of cultures, cultures of science. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 24:162–85 [Google Scholar]
  57. Furlong K. 2012. Municipal disconnect: on abject water and its urban infrastructures. Ethnography 13:487–509 [Google Scholar]
  58. Gandy M. 2002. Concrete and Clay: Reworking Nature in New York City London: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  59. Ghertner A. 2013. Nuisance talk: middle class discourses of a slum free Delhi. See Rademacher & Sivaramakrishnan 2013 249–76
  60. Gidwani V. 2013. Value struggles: waste work and urban ecology in Delhi. See Rademacher & Sivaramakrishnan 2013 169–200
  61. Gregory S. 1998. Black Corona: Race and the Politics of Place in an Urban Community Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  62. Grove R. 1989. Green Imperialism: Colonial Expansion, Tropical Island Edens and the Origins of Environmentalism 1600–1860 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  63. Gupta A. 1995. Blurred boundaries: the discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state. Am. Ethnol. 22:375–402 [Google Scholar]
  64. Gupta A, Ferguson J. 1992. Beyond culture: space, identity, and the politics of difference. Cult. Anthropol. 7:6–23 [Google Scholar]
  65. Gururani S. 2013. Flexible planning: the making of India's millennium city, Gurgaon. See Rademacher & Sivaramakrishnan 2013 119–44
  66. Hansen TB. 2001. Wages of Violence: Naming and Identity in Postcolonial Bombay Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  67. Haraway DJ. 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  68. Haraway DJ. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  69. Haraway DJ. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  70. Harvey D. 1973. Social Justice and the City Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  71. Heynen N. 2013. Urban political ecology 1: the urban century. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 38:598–604 [Google Scholar]
  72. Holston J, Appadurai A. 1999. Cities and Citizenship. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  73. Jasanoff S, Martello M. 2004. Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  74. Joyce P. 2003. The Rule of Freedom: Liberalism and the Modern City New York: Verso [Google Scholar]
  75. Kaika M. 2005. City of Flows: Modernity, Nature, and the City London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  76. Kirksey SE, Helmreich S. 2010. The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cult. Anthropol. 25:545–76 [Google Scholar]
  77. Latour B. 1988. Science in Action: How To Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  78. Latour B. 1993a. We Have Never Been Modern Transl. C Porter Cambridge MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  79. Latour B. 1993b. The Pasteurization of France Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  80. Latour B. 1999. Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  81. Latour B, Woolgar S. 1986. Laboratory Life: the Construction of Scientific Facts Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  82. Lefebvre H. 2003. The Urban Revolution Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press [Google Scholar]
  83. Li T. 1999. Transforming the Indonesian Uplands: Marginality, Power and Production Amsterdam, The Neth: Harwood Acad. [Google Scholar]
  84. Liechty M. 2003. Suitably Modern: Making Middle Class Culture in a New Consumer Society Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  85. Low S. 2003. Behind the Gates: Life, Security, and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  86. Mankekar P. 1999. Screening Culture, Viewing Politics: An Ethnography of Television, Womanhood, and Nation in Postcolonial India Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  87. Mathews A. 2011. Instituting Nature: Authority, Expertise, and Power in Mexican Forests. Cambridge: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  88. Mazzarella W. 2003. Shoveling Smoke: Advertising and Globalization in Contemporary India Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  89. Meehan K. 2013. Tool-power: water infrastructure as wellsprings of state power. Geoforum 57:215–44 [Google Scholar]
  90. Mitchell T. 1991. The limits of the state: beyond statist approaches and their critics. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 85:77–96 [Google Scholar]
  91. Mitchell T. 2002a. Can the mosquito speak?. See Mitchell 2002b 327–360
  92. Mitchell T. 2002b. Rule of Experts: Egypt, Technopolitics, Modernity Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  93. Mosse D. 1997. The symbolic making of a common property resource: history, ecology and locality in a tank-irrigated landscape in South India. Dev. Change 28:467–504 [Google Scholar]
  94. Mosse D. 2003. The Rule of Water: Statecraft, Ecology, and Collective Action in South India New Delhi: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  95. O'Dougherty M. 2002. Consumption Intensified: The Politics of Middle Class Daily Life in Brazil Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  96. Ogden L, Hall B, Tanita K. 2010. Animals, plants, people, and things: a review of multispecies ethnography. Environ. Soc. 4:5–24 [Google Scholar]
  97. Ong A. 1999. Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  98. Peet R, Watts M. 1996. Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  99. Peluso N, Watts M. 2001. Violent Environments Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  100. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML. 2002. Ecosystem as a multidimensional concept: meaning, model and metaphor. Ecosystems 5:1–10 [Google Scholar]
  101. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML. 2006. Advancing urban ecological studies: frameworks, concepts, and results from the Baltimore Ecosystem Study. Austral Ecol. 31:114–25 [Google Scholar]
  102. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove M. 2004. Resilient cities: meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms. Landsc. Urban Plan. 69:369–84 [Google Scholar]
  103. Rademacher A. 2009. When is housing an environmental problem? Reforming informality in Kathmandu. Curr. Anthropol. 50:513–33 [Google Scholar]
  104. Rademacher A. 2011. Reigning the River: Urban Ecologies and Political Transformation in Kathmandu Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  105. Rademacher A, Sivaramakrishnan K. 2013. Ecologies of Urbanism in India: Metropolitan Civility and Sustainability. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  106. Raffles H. 2002. In Amazonia Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  107. Riles A. 2000. The Network Inside Out Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press [Google Scholar]
  108. Robbins P. 2004. Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction New York: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  109. Roy A. 2009. Civic governmentality: the politics of inclusion in Beirut and Mumbai. Antipode 41:159–79 [Google Scholar]
  110. Saberwal VK. 1999. Pastoral Politics: Shepherds, Bureaucrats, and Conservation in the Western Himalaya Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  111. Sassen S. 1991. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  112. Scott J. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes To Improve the Human Condition Have Failed New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  113. Sivaramakrishnan K. 1999. Modern Forests: Statemaking and Environmental Change in Colonial Eastern India Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  114. Sivaramakrishnan K. 2002. Forest co-management as science and democracy in West Bengal, India. Environ. Values 11:277–302 [Google Scholar]
  115. Skaria A. 1999. Hybrid Histories: Forests, Frontiers, and Wildness in Western India Delhi: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  116. Smith N. 1984. Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space New York: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  117. Swyngedouw E. 1996. The city as a hybrid: on nature, society, and cyborg urbanisation. Capital. Nat. Social. 7:65–80 [Google Scholar]
  118. Swyngedouw E. 1999. Modernity and hybridity: nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890–1930. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 89:444–65 [Google Scholar]
  119. Taylor P, Buttel F. 1992. How do we know we have global environmental problems? Science and the globalization of environmental discourse. Geoforum 23.3:405–16 [Google Scholar]
  120. Tsing A. 1993. In the Realm of the Diamond Queen: Marginality in an Out of the Way Place Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  121. Tsing A. 2000. The global situation. Curr. Anthropol. 15:327–60 [Google Scholar]
  122. Tsing A. 2005. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connections Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  123. Tsing A. 2012. Unruly edges: mushrooms as companion species. Environ. Hum. 1:141–54 [Google Scholar]
  124. Vandergeest P, Peluso N. 1995. Territorialization and state power in Thailand. Theory Soc. 24:385–426 [Google Scholar]
  125. Vayda A, Walters B. 1999. Against political ecology. Hum. Ecol. 27:167–79 [Google Scholar]
  126. West P. 2006. Conservation Is Our Government Now: The Politics of Ecology in Papua New Guinea Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  127. Williams R. 1980. Problems in Materialism and Culture: Selected Essays London: New Left Books [Google Scholar]
  128. Wolf E. 1982. Europe and the People Without History Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  129. Wolfe C. 2009. What Is Posthumanism? Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press [Google Scholar]
  130. Worster D. 1977. Nature's Economy: The Roots of Ecology San Francisco: Sierra Club [Google Scholar]
  131. Zeiderman A. 2015a. Endangered City: The Politics of Security and Risk in Bogota Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  132. Zeiderman A. 2015b. Zones of uncertainty: governing urban environmental hazards. Modes of Uncertainty: Anthropological Cases L Samimian-Darash, P Rabinow 182–200 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  133. Zimmerer K. 2000. The reworking of conservation geographies: nonequilibrium landscapes and nature society hybrids. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 90:356–69 [Google Scholar]
  134. Zimmerer K, Bassett T. 2003. Political Ecology: An Integrative Approach to Geography and Environment-Development Studies. New York: Guilford [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014208
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error