Political Parody and the Politics of Ambivalence

Literature Cited

1. Anderson P. 2013. The politics of scorn in Syria and the agency of narrated involvement. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 19:463–81
   [Google Scholar]
2. Apte ML. 1985. Humor and Laughter: An Anthropological Approach Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
3. Arns I, Sasse S 2015. Subversive affirmation: on mimesis as a strategy of resistance. NSK from Kapital to Capital Z Badovinac, E Čufer, A Gardner 266–76 Ljubljana, Slov./Cambridge, MA/London: Moderna Galerija/MIT Press
   [Google Scholar]
4. Arunima G. 2007. Shifting sands: satire, selfhood and the politics of laughter. Tapasam 2:3–4442–54
   [Google Scholar]
5. Ashley J. 2014. Prime-time politics: news, parody and fictional credibility in Chile. Am. Ethnol. 41:4757–70
   [Google Scholar]
6. Attardo S. 2001. Humor and irony in interaction: from mode adoption to failure of detection. Say Not to Say: New Perspectives of Miscommunication L Anolli, R Ciceri, G Riva 166–85 Amsterdam: IOS Press
   [Google Scholar]
7. Babcock-Abrahams B. 1975. “A tolerated margin of mess”: the trickster and his tales reconsidered. J. Folkl. Inst. 11:3147–86
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bakhtin MM. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays M Holquist, transl. C Emerson, M Holquist Austin: Univ. Tex. Press
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bakhtin MM. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bakhtin MM. 1984 (1965). Rabelais and His World Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
11. Baločkaitė R. 2016. Post-Soviet mimicry: grotesque but empowering. New Eastern Europe July 26. http://neweasterneurope.eu/2016/07/26/post-soviet-mimicry-grotesque-but-empowering/
    [Google Scholar]
12. Barley N. 1983. The Innocent Anthropologist: Notes from a Mud Hut London: Br. Mus. Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bateson G. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind New York: Ballantine
    [Google Scholar]
14. Baudrillard J. 1983. Simulacra and Simulations transl. P Foss, P Patton, P Beitchman New York: Semiotext(e)
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bauman R, Briggs CL 1990. Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on social life. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 19:59–88
    [Google Scholar]
16. Bauman Z. 1991. Modernity and Ambivalence Cambridge, UK: Polity
    [Google Scholar]
17. Baumgartner JC, Morris JS 2006. The Daily Show effect: candidate evaluations, efficacy, and American youth. Am. Polit. Res. 34:3341–67
    [Google Scholar]
18. Baym G. 2005. From Cronkite to Colbert: The Evolution of Broadcast News Boulder, CO: Paradigm
    [Google Scholar]
19. Baym G, Jones JP 2012. News parody in global perspective: politics, power, and resistance. Popular Commun 10:2–13
    [Google Scholar]
20. Benjamin W. 2007 (1936). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. Illuminations: Essays and Reflections217–51 New York: Shocken Books
    [Google Scholar]
21. Bennett J. 2009. A feeling of insincerity: politics, ventriloquy, and the dialectics of gesture. The Rhetoric of Sincerity E van Alphen, M Bal, C Smith 195–213 Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
22. Benson M. 1996. Predictions of Fire Doc. Video, 90 min Kinetikon Pict. New York:
    [Google Scholar]
23. Berger AA. 1995. Blind Men and Elephants: Perspectives on Humor New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Berger AA. 1996. The politics of laughter. The Social Faces of Humour: Practices and Issues GEC Paton, C Powell, S Wagg 15–28 Aldershot, UK: Arena
    [Google Scholar]
25. Berger PL. 1997. Redeeming Laughter New York: Walter De Gruyter
    [Google Scholar]
26. Berliner D, Lambek M, Shweder R, Irvine R, Piette A 2016. Anthropology and the study of contradictions. HAU: J. Ethnogr. Theory 6:11–27
    [Google Scholar]
27. Bernal V. 2013. Please forget democracy and justice: Eritrean politics and the powers of humor. Am. Ethnol. 40:2300–9
    [Google Scholar]
28. Bhabha H. 1984. Of mimicry and man: the ambivalence of colonial discourse. In Discipleship: A Special Issue on Psychoanalysis. October 28:125–33
    [Google Scholar]
29. Billig M. 2005. Laughter and Ridicule: Towards a Social Critique of Humor London: Sage
    [Google Scholar]
30. Bippus A. 2007. Factors predicting the perceived effectiveness of politicians’ use of humour during a debate. Humour: Int. J. Humour Res. 20:105–21
    [Google Scholar]
31. Blouke C. 2015. Borat, Sacha Baron Cohen, and the seriousness of (mock) documentary. Comedy Stud 6:14–17
    [Google Scholar]
32. Bogad LM. 2005. Electoral Guerrilla Theatre: Radical Ridicule and Social Movements New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
33. Boyer D. 2013. Simply the best: parody and political sincerity in Iceland. Am. Ethnol. 40:2276–87
    [Google Scholar]
34. Boyer D, Yurchak A 2010. American stiob: or, what late-socialist aesthetics of parody reveal about contemporary political culture in the West. Cult. Anthropol. 25:2179–221
    [Google Scholar]
35. Boyle MS. 2010. Play with authority! Radical performance and performative irony. Thamyris/Intersecting 21:199–218
    [Google Scholar]
36. Burke K. 1945. A Grammar of Motives Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
37. Butler J, Gambetti Z, Sabsay L 2016. Introduction. Vulnerability in Resistance J Butler, Z Gambetti, L Sabsay 1–11 Durham, NC/London: Duke Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
38. Campus D. 2010. Mediatization and personalization of politics in Italy and France: the cases of Berlusconi and Sarkozy. Int. J. Press/Polit. 15:2219–35
    [Google Scholar]
39. Carrithers M. 2012. Story seeds and the inchoate. Durham Anthropol. J. 14:11–20
    [Google Scholar]
40. Cochran R. 1989. What courage! Romanian “our leader” jokes. J. Am. Folkl. 102:405259–74
    [Google Scholar]
41. Coleman S, Kuik A, van Zoonen L 2009. Laughter and liability: the politics of British and Dutch television satire. Br. J. Polit. Int. Relat. 11:652–65
    [Google Scholar]
42. Combs JE, Nimmo D 1996. The Comedy of Democracy Westport, CT: Praeger
    [Google Scholar]
43. Coupland N. 2001. Dialect stylization in radio talk. Lang. Soc. 30:345–75
    [Google Scholar]
44. Creed GW. 2011. Masquerade and Postsocialism: Ritual and Cultural Dispossession in Bulgaria Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
45. Critchley S. 2009. Cynicism we can believe in. New York Times April 1, p. A31
    [Google Scholar]
46. Critchley S. 2013. It's time to make Shakespeare dangerous. Guardian Sept. 20. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/sep/20/shakespeare-hamlet-dangerous-critchley-webster?CMP=twt_gu
    [Google Scholar]
47. Curtis A. 2016. HyperNormalisation Doc. Video, 166 min BBC London:
    [Google Scholar]
48. Cusick SG. 2017. Musicology, performativity, acoustemology. Theorizing Sound Writing DA Kapchan 25–45 Middletown, CT: Wesleyan Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
49. Das V. 2012. Ordinary ethics. A Companion to Moral Anthropology D Fassin 133–49 Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
50. Davies C. 1990. Ethnic Humor Around the World: A Comparative Analysis Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
51. Davis MS. 1995. The sociology of humor: a stillborn field. Sociol. Forum 10:2327–39
    [Google Scholar]
52. Douglas M. 1968. The social control of cognition: some factors in joke perception. Man 3:361–76
    [Google Scholar]
53. Eckardt AR. 1992. Sitting in the Earth and Laughing: A Handbook of Humor New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Evans-Pritchard EE. 1940. The Neur: A Description of the Models of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Nilotic People Oxford, UK: Clarendon
    [Google Scholar]
55. Fernandez JW, Huber MT 2001. Irony in Action: Anthropology, Practice and the Moral Imagination Chicago/London: Chicago Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
56. Fieschi C, Heywood P 2004. Trust, cynicism, and populist anti-politics. J. Polit. Ideol. 9:3289–309
    [Google Scholar]
57. Fish S. 1983. Short people got no reason to live: reading irony. Daedalus 112:1175–91
    [Google Scholar]
58. Freedman L. 2012. Wit as a political weapon: satirists and censors. Soc. Res. 79:187–112
    [Google Scholar]
59. Fry WF. 1976. The power of political humour. J. Popul. Cult. 10:227–31
    [Google Scholar]
60. Gal S. 1995. Language and “The Arts of Resistance. .” Cult. Anthropol. 10:3407–24
    [Google Scholar]
61. Gal S. 2015. Politics of translation. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 44:225–40
    [Google Scholar]
62. Goldstein DM. 2013. Laughter Out of Place: Race, Class, Violence, and Sexuality in a Rio Shantytown Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press, 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
63. Goody J. 1977. The Domestication of the Savage Mind Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
64. Gray J. 2005. Watching with the Simpsons: Television, Parody, and Intertextuality New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
65. Gray J. 2009. Throwing out the welcome mat: public figures as guests and victims in TV satire. See Gray et al. 2009a 147–65
66. Gray J, Jones JP, Thompson E 2009a. Satire TV: Politics and Comedy in the Post-Network Era New York/London: N. Y. Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
67. Gray J, Jones JP, Thompson E 2009b. The state of satire, the satire of state. See Gray et al. 2009a 3–36
68. Gruner CR. 1978. Understanding Laughter: The Workings of Wit and Humor Chicago: Nelson-Hall
    [Google Scholar]
69. Hasner R. 1952. Wit as a weapon. Saturday Rev 35:13–1451
    [Google Scholar]
70. Haugerud A. 2013a. Jon Stewart returns to The Daily Show—why satire matters. Huff Post Media Sept. 5. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/american-anthropological-association/jon-stewart-returns-to-th_b_3844730.html
    [Google Scholar]
71. Haugerud A. 2013b. No Billionaire Left Behind: Satirical Activism in America Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
72. Haugerud A, Mahoney D, Ference M 2012. Watching The Daily Show in Kenya. Identities: Glob. Stud. Cult. Power 19:2168–90
    [Google Scholar]
73. Herzfeld M. 1997. Cultural Intimacy: Social Poetics in the Nation State New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
74. Herzfeld M. 2015. Anthropology and the inchoate intimacies of power. Am. Ethnol. 42:118–32
    [Google Scholar]
75. Higgie R. 2014. Kynical dogs and cynical masters: contemporary satire, politics and truth-telling. Humor 27:2183–201
    [Google Scholar]
76. Higgie R. 2015. Playful politicians and serious satirists: comedic and earnest interplay in Australian political discourse. Comedy Stud 6:163–77
    [Google Scholar]
77. Hill JH. 2008. The Everyday Language of White Racism Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
78. Huizinga J. 1955. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture Boston: Beacon
    [Google Scholar]
79. Hutcheon L. 1995. Irony's Edge: The Theory and Politics of Irony London/New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
80. Jackson J. 2013. Political Oratory and Cartooning: An Ethnography of Democratic Process in Madagascar Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
81. Jeffries MP. 2017. Behind the Laughs: Community and Inequality in Comedy Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
82. Jones JP. 2010. Entertaining Politics: Satiric Television and Political Engagement New York: Rowan and Littlefield
    [Google Scholar]
83. Jovanović D. 2016. Ambivalence and the study of contradictions. HAU: J. Ethnogr. Theory 6:31–6
    [Google Scholar]
84. Kavaliauskaitė J. 2009. Hybrid entertainment television: viewership of the Lithuanian “Dviracio Sou.”. See Krikmann & Laineste 2009 99–124
85. Kierans C, Bell K 2017. Cultivating ambivalence: some methodological considerations for anthropology. HAU: J. Ethnogr. Theory 7:223–44
    [Google Scholar]
86. Klumbytė N. 2011. Political intimacy: power, laughter and coexistence in late Soviet Lithuania. East Eur. Polit. Soc. Cult. 25:4658–77
    [Google Scholar]
87. Klumbytė N. 2014. Of power and laughter: carnivalesque politics and moral citizenship in Lithuania. Am. Ethnol. 41:3473–90
    [Google Scholar]
88. Knight DM. 2015. Wit and Greece's economic crisis: ironic slogans, food and antiausterity sentiments. Am. Ethnol. 42:2230–46
    [Google Scholar]
89. Koller MR. 1988. Humor and Society: Explorations in the Sociology of Humor Houston, TX: Cap and Gown Press
    [Google Scholar]
90. Kowsar N. 2012. Being funny is not that funny: contemporary editorial cartooning in Iran. Soc. Res. 79:1117–44
    [Google Scholar]
91. Krefting R. 2014. All Joking Aside: American Humor and Its Discontents Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
92. Krikmann A, Laineste L 2009. Permitted Laughter: Socialist, Post-Socialist and Never-Socialist Humour Tartu: ELM Sch. Press
    [Google Scholar]
93. Kuipers G, Maniouschka M 2001. Goede humor, slechte smaak: Nederlands ove mappen Amsterdam: Boom
    [Google Scholar]
94. La Boétie E. 1975. The Politics of Obedience: The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude New York: Free Life
    [Google Scholar]
95. Lampland M, Nadkarni M 2016. “What happened to jokes?” The shifting landscape of humor in Hungary. East Eur. Politics Soc. Cult. 30:2449–71
    [Google Scholar]
96. Landreville KD. 2015. Satire as uncertain territory: uncertainty expression in discussion about political satire, opinion, and news. Humor 28:4559–82
    [Google Scholar]
97. Lempert M. 2014. Imitation. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 43:379–95
    [Google Scholar]
98. Marcus G. 2001. The predicament of irony and the paranoid style in fin-de-siècle rationality. See Fernandez & Huber 2001 209–23
99. May T. 2017. A Fragile Life: Accepting our Vulnerability Chicago/London: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
100. Mbembe A. 1992. Provisional notes on the postcolony. Africa 62:13–37
     [Google Scholar]
101. Mintz LE. 1986. Review (of Humor and Laughter: An Anthropological Approach by ML Apte; WHIMSY III: Contemporary Humor by DLF Nilsen, AP Nilsen). J. Am. Folkl. 99:393339–41
     [Google Scholar]
102. Mitchell WE. 1992. Carnival clowning in Wape society. Clowning as Critical Practice: Performance Humor in the South Pacific WE Mitchell 145–66 Pittsburgh, PA: Univ. Pittsburgh Press
     [Google Scholar]
103. Molé NJ. 2013. Trusted puppets, tarnished politicians: humor and cynicism in Berlusconi's Italy. Am. Ethnol. 40:2288–29
     [Google Scholar]
104. Moritz Schwarcz LK. 2013. The banana emperor: D. Pedro II in Brazilian caricatures, 1842–89. Am. Ethnol. 40:2310–23
     [Google Scholar]
105. Morson GS. 1989. Parody, history, and metaparody. See Morson & Emerson 1989 63–86
106. Morson GS, Emerson C 1989. Rethinking Bakhtin: Extensions and Challenges Evanston IL: Northwest. Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
107. Mulkay M. 1988. On Humor: Its Nature and Its Place in Modern Society Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
108. Neale S, Krutnik F 1990. Popular Film and Television Comedy New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
109. O'Neill KL. 2010. City of God: Christian Citizenship in Postwar Guatemala Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
110. Onyeoziri GN. 2011. Shaken Wisdom: Irony and Meaning in Postcolonial African Fiction Charlottesville/London: Univ. Va. Press
     [Google Scholar]
111. Oring E. 1984. The Jokes of Sigmund Freud: A Study in Humor and Jewish Identity Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
     [Google Scholar]
112. Oring E. 2008. Humor in anthropology and folklore. See Raskin 2008a 183–210
113. Ortner SB. 1995. Resistance and the problem of ethnographic refusal. Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist. 37:1173–93
     [Google Scholar]
114. Ortner SB. 2016. Dark anthropology and its others: theory since the eighties. HAU: J. Ethnogr. Theory 6:147–73
     [Google Scholar]
115. Oushakine SA. 2011. Introduction: jokes of repression. East Eur. Polit. Soc. Cult. 25:4655–57
     [Google Scholar]
116. Oushakine SA. 2012. “Red laughter”: on refined weapons of Soviet jesters. Soc. Res. 79:1189–216
     [Google Scholar]
117. Parkin R. 1993. The joking relationship and kinship: charting a theoretical dependency. J. Anthropol. Soc. Oxf. 24:3251–63
     [Google Scholar]
118. Petrović T. 2015. Serbia in the mirror: parodying political and media discourses. Slavic Rev 74:2288–310
     [Google Scholar]
119. Powell C. 1988. A phenomenological analysis of humour in society. Humour in Society: Resistance and Control C Powell, GEC Paton 86–105 New York: St. Martin's Press
     [Google Scholar]
120. Radcliffe-Brown AR. 1940. On joking relationships. Africa 13:3195–210
     [Google Scholar]
121. Radcliffe-Brown AR. 1949. A further note on joking relationships. Africa 19:2133–40
     [Google Scholar]
122. Rajković I. 2018. For an anthropology of the demoralized: state pay, mock-labour and unfreedom in a Serbian firm. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 24:47–70
     [Google Scholar]
123. Raskin V. 2008a. The Primer of Humor Research Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter
     [Google Scholar]
124. Raskin V. 2008b. Theory of humor and practice of humor research: editor's notes and thoughts. See Raskin 2008a 1–15
125. Roncarolo F. 2004. Mediation of Italian politics and the marketing of leaders’ private lives. Parliam. Aff. 57:1108–17
     [Google Scholar]
126. Schutz CE. 1977. Political Humor: From Aristophanes to Sam Ervin London: Assoc. Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
127. Sclafani J. 2009. Martha Stewart behaving badly: parody and the symbolic meaning of style. J. Sociolinguist. 13:5613–33
     [Google Scholar]
128. Scott JC. 1985. Weapons of the Week: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
129. Silverstein M, Urban G 1996. Natural Histories of Discourse Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
130. Sloterdijk P. 1988. Critique of Cynical Reason Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
     [Google Scholar]
131. Smith C, Voth B 2002. The role of humor in political argument: how “strategery” and “lockboxes” changed a political campaign. Argum. Advocacy 39:110–29
     [Google Scholar]
132. Sombatpoonsiri J. 2015. Humor and Nonviolent Struggle in Serbia Syracuse, NY: Syracuse Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
133. Steinmüller H. 2011. The state of irony in China. Crit. Anthropol. 31:121–42
     [Google Scholar]
134. Tanner L. 2011. Sideshow: Dumbing Down Democracy Melbourne: Scribe
     [Google Scholar]
135. Tsakona V, Popa DE 2011. Studies in Political Humour: In Between Political Critique and Public Entertainment Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
     [Google Scholar]
136. Webb R. 1981. Political uses of humor. Et Cetera 3:35–50
     [Google Scholar]
137. Wedeen L. 1999. Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
138. Yalcintas A 2015. Creativity and Humor in Occupy Movements Houndmills, UK: Palgrave
     [Google Scholar]
139. Yarwood DL. 2004. When Congress Makes a Joke: Congressional Humor Then and Now New York: Rowman and Littlefield
     [Google Scholar]
140. Young MW. 1977. Bursting with laughter: obscenity, values and sexual control in a Massim society. Canberra Anthropol 1:175–87
     [Google Scholar]
141. Yurchak A. 2006. Everything was Forever, Until It was No More: The Last Soviet Generation Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
142. Yurchak A. 2011. A parasite from outer space: how Sergei Kurekhin proved that Lenin was a mushroom. Slavic Rev 70:2307–33
     [Google Scholar]
143. Yurchak A. 2017. Trump, monstration and the limits of liberalism Paper presented at American Ethnological Society Annual Meeting, Stanford Univ. Stanford, CA: March
     [Google Scholar]
144. Yurchak A. 2018. Trump, Russia, and monstrations. Hot Spots. Cult. Anthropol. April 25. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/1408-trump-russia-and-monstrations
     [Google Scholar]
145. Zigon J. 2010. Making the New Post-Soviet Person: Moral Experience in Contemporary Moscow Leiden, Neth.: Brill
     [Google Scholar]
146. Živković M. 2007. “Mile versus transition”: a perfect informant in the slushy swamp of Serbian politics. Soc. Identities 13:5597–610
     [Google Scholar]