1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Anthropology
  4. Volume 49, 2020
  5. Article

Annual Review of Anthropology

Volume 49, 2020

Typologies, Typifications, and Types

Abstract

This article positions types at the center of anthropological knowledge production, considering them both from the abstract, analytical perspective of expert typologies and from the tacit, phenomenological perspective of everyday practices of typification. Proposing what an “anthropology of types,” broadly construed and across these two scales, might look like, I examine the histories and uses of types and typological thinking in anthropology, highlighting the empirical, analytical, methodological, ethical, and political questions they have raised. I then describe the phenomenological foundations of typification, how sociocultural and linguistic anthropologists have approached it, and the accompanying challenges related to translation and representation. Finally, I review ethnographies of expert practices of type production, tracing the circuit of typification–typology–type and back again to show how forms of expertise institutionalize lay knowledge in ways that further solidify the misrecognition of types as natural, and examine visual and arts-based interventions that draw attention to these processes.

Keyword(s): categories, classification, epistemology, ethnography, expertise, representation
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011235
2020-10-21
2024-12-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/anthro/49/1/annurev-anthro-102218-011235.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011235&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adams WY, Adams EW. 1991. Archaeological Typology and Practical Reality: A Dialectical Approach to Artifact Classification and Sorting Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Agha A. 2011. Large and small scale forms of personhood. Lang. Comm. 31:3171–80
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Armelagos GJ, Van Gerven DP 2003. A century of skeletal biology and paleopathology: contrasts, contradictions, and conflicts. Am. Anthropol. 105:153–64
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Arvin M. 2019. Possessing Polynesians: The Science of Settler Colonial Whiteness in Hawaii and Oceania Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker LD. 1998. From Savage to Negro: Anthropology and the Construction of Race, 1896–1954 Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Barker J, Harms E, Lindquist J 2013. Introduction to special issue: figuring the transforming city. City Soc 25:2159–72
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Barker J, Harms E, Lindquist J 2014. Figures of Southeast Asian Modernity Honolulu: Univ. Hawai‘i Press
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Beliso-De Jesús AM. 2020. The jungle academy: molding white supremacy in American police recruits. Am. Anthropol. 121:1143–56
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Benjamin R. 2019. Race after Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code Medford, MA: Polity
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bennett T, Cameron F, Dias N, Dibley B, Harrison R et al. 2017. Collecting, Ordering, Governing: Anthropology, Museums, and Liberal Government Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Berger PL, Luckmann T. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge Garden City, NY: Doubleday
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Besteman CL, Gusterson H 2019. Life by Algorithms: How Roboprocesses Are Remaking Our World Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Biehl JG, Locke PA 2017. Unfinished: The Anthropology of Becoming Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Bornstein A. 2015. Institutional racism, numbers management, and zero-tolerance policing in New York City. N. Am. Dialogue 18:251–62
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Bornstein A. 2018. Anthropological lessons for police. See Karpiak & Garriott 2018 82–97
  16. Bourdieu P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Bowker GC, Star SL. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences Cambridge, MA: MIT
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Braun L, Hammonds E. 2012. The dilemma of classification: the past in the present. See Wailoo et al. 2012 67–80
  19. Bray Z. 2018. Ethnographic portrait-painting today: opening up the process at NYC's American Natural History Museum. Vis. Ethnogr. 7:113–33
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Browne S. 2015. Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Cantarella L, Hegel C, Marcus GE 2019. Ethnography by Design: Scenographic Experiments in Fieldwork London: Bloomsbury Acad.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Carnegie CV. 1996. The dundus and the nation. Cult. Anthropol. 11:4470–509
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Caspari R. 2003. From types to populations: a century of race, physical anthropology, and the American Anthropological Association. Am. Anthropol. 105:165–76
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Caspari R. 2018. Race, then and now: 1918 revisited. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 165:4924–38
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Choksi N. 2020. Expressives and the multimodal depiction of social types in Mundari. Lang. Soc. 49:379–98
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Coates J. 2017. Key figure of mobility: the flâneur. Soc. Anthropol. 25:128–41
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Corsín Jiménez A. 2014. Introduction: the prototype: more than many and less than one. J. Cult. Econ. 7:4381–98
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Corsín Jiménez A. 2018. Prototyping. Routledge Handbook of Interdisciplinary Research Methods C Lury, R Fensham, A Heller-Nicholas, S Lammes, A Last, et al 122–25 London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Corsín Jiménez A, Estalella A 2017. Ethnography: a prototype. Ethnos 82:5846–66
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Cox AM. 2015. Shapeshifters: Black Girls and the Choreography of Citizenship Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Crawford K, Paglen T. 2019. Excavating AI: the politics of images in machine learning training sets. Excavating AI https://www.excavating.ai
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Dávila AM. 2001. Latinos, Inc.: The Marketing and Making of a People. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  33. de Koning A, Vollebergh A 2019. Ordinary icons: public discourses and everyday lives in an anxious Europe. Am. Anthropol. 121:2390–402
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Delaplace G. 2019. More than corpses, less than ghosts: a visual theory of culture in early ethnographic photography. Vis. Anthropol. Rev. 35:137–49
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Desjarlais R, Throop CJ. 2011. Phenomenological approaches in anthropology. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 40:187–102
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Edwards E. 1990. Photographic “types”: the pursuit of method. Vis. Anthropol. 3:235–58
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Edwards E. 1997. Ordering others: photography, anthropologies, and taxonomies. In Visible Light: Photography and Classification in Art, Science, and the Everyday C Iles, R Roberts 54–68 Oxford, UK: Mus. Mod. Art
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Engebrigtsen AI. 2017. Key figure of mobility: the nomad. Soc. Anthropol. 25:142–54
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Eubanks V. 2017. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor New York: St. Martin's Press
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Ewen E, Ewen S. 2006. Typecasting: On the Arts and Sciences of Human Inequality: A History of Dominant Ideas New York: Seven Stories Press
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Fassin D 2017. Writing the World of Policing: The Difference Ethnography Makes Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Feldman J. 2017. Key figure of mobility: the pilgrim. Soc. Anthropol. 25:169–82
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Fernandez AV. 2016. Phenomenology, typification, and ideal types in psychiatric diagnosis and classification. Knowing and Acting in Medicine R Bluhm 39–58 Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Int.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Ford JA, Steward JH. 1954. On the concept of types. Am. Anthropol. 56:142–57
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Fullwilley D. 2014. The “contemporary synthesis”: when politically inclusive genomic science relies on biological notions of race. Isis 105:803–14
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Garfinkel H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Garland-Thomson R. 2009. Staring: How We Look Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Gates KA. 2011. Our Biometric Future: Facial Recognition Technology and the Culture of Surveillance New York: NYU Press
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Gibbings S. 2013. Unseen powers and democratic detectives: street vendors in an Indonesian city. City Soc 25:2235–59
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Giddens A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Gnecco C, Langebaek CH 2014. Against Typological Tyranny in Archaeology: A South American Perspective New York: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Goffman E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life Garden City, NY: Doubleday
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Goffman E. 1972. 1955. On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Communication in Face to Face Interaction: Selected Readings J Laver, S Hutcheson 319–46 Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Goffman E. 1986. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity New York: Simon & Schuster
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Goodenough WH. 1999. Category. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 9:1–224–27
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Goodwin C. 1994. Professional vision. Am. Anthropol. 96:3606–33
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Graburn N. 2017. Key figure of mobility: the tourist. Soc. Anthropol. 25:183–96
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Hacking I. 2007. Kinds of people: moving targets. Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol. 151, 2006 Lectures PJ Marshall 285–317 Oxford, UK: Br. Acad.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Hackl A. 2017. Key figure of mobility: the exile. Soc. Anthropol. 25:155–68
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Haraway DJ. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Harkness N. 2015. The pragmatics of qualia in practice. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 44:573–89
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Hartigan J. 2005. Odd Tribes: Toward a Cultural Analysis of White People Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Hartigan J. 2013. Mexican genomics and the roots of racial thinking. Cult. Anthropol. 28:3372–95
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Hartigan J. 2017. Care of the Species: Races of Corn and the Science of Plant Biodiversity Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Heritage JC. 1988. Ethnomethodology. Social Theory Today A Giddens, JH Turner 224–72 Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Herrera BE. 2015. Latin Numbers: Playing Latino in Twentieth-Century U.S. Popular Performance. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Hinterberger A. 2012. Categorization, census, and multiculturalism: molecular politics and material of nation. See Wailoo et al. 2012 204–24
  68. Horn DG. 2003. The Criminal Body: Lombroso and the Anatomy of Deviance New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Irvine JT. 2016. Going upscale: scales and scale-climbing as ideological projects. Scale: Discourse and Dimensions of Social Life ES Carr, M Lempert 213–32 Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Jackson JL. 2005. Real Black: Adventures in Racial Sincerity Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Jackson SE. 2017. Envisioning artifacts: a classic Maya view of the archaeological record. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 24:2579–610
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Jain SL. 2018. Things that art. Anthropol. Human. 43:15–20
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Jönsson L, Lenskjold TU. 2018. Speculative prototypes and alien ethnographies: experimenting with relations beyond the human. Rev. Diseña 11:134–47
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Kahn J. 2018. Race on the Brain: What Implicit Bias Gets Wrong about the Struggle for Racial Justice New York: Columbia Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Karpiak KG, Garriott W 2018. The Anthropology of Police New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Keane W. 2011. Indexing voice: a morality tale. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 21:2166–78
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Keck F. 2009. The limits of classification: Claude Lévi-Strauss and Mary Douglas. The Cambridge Companion to Lévi-Strauss B Wiseman 139–55 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Kim L. 2018. Race Experts: Sculpture, Anthropology, and the American Public in Malvina Hoffman's Races of Mankind Lincoln: Univ. Neb. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Kluckhohn C. 1939. The place of theory in anthropological studies. Phil. Sci. 6:3328–44
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Kluckhohn C. 1960. The use of typology in anthropological theory. Men and Cultures: Selected Papers of the Fifth International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences AF Wallace 134–40 Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Kondo DK. 2018. Worldmaking: Race, Performance, and the Work of Creativity Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Krieger AD. 1944. The typological concept. Am. Antiq. 9:3271–88
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Lakoff G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  84. le Grand E. 2019. Conceptualising social types and figures: from social forms to classificatory struggles. Cult. Soc. 13:4411–27
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Lindfors A. 2019. Cultivating participation and the varieties of reflexivity in stand‐up comedy. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 29:3276–93
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Lindquist J. 2015. Of figures and types: brokering knowledge and migration in Indonesia and beyond. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 21:S1162–77
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Londoño J. 2015. The Latino-ness of type: making design identities socially significant. Soc. Semiotics 25:2142–50
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Luvaas B. 2016. Street Style: An Ethnography of Fashion Blogging London: Bloomsbury Academic
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Luvaas B. 2019. Unbecoming: the aftereffects of autoethnography. Ethnography 20:2245–62
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Lyman RL, O'Brien MJ, Dunnell RC 1997. Americanist Culture History: Fundamentals of Time, Space, and Form Boston: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  91. MacLaury RE. 1991. Prototypes revisited. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 20:55–74
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Maghbouleh N. 2017. The Limits of Whiteness: Iranian Americans and the Everyday Politics of Race Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Magnet SA. 2011. When Biometrics Fail: Gender, Race, and the Technology of Identity Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Maguire M. 2018. Policing future crimes. See Maguire et al. 2018 137–58
  95. Maguire M, Rao U, Zurawski N 2018. Bodies as Evidence: Security, Knowledge, and Power Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Marcus G. 2014. Prototyping and contemporary anthropological experiments with ethnographic method. J. Cult. Econ. 7:4399–410
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Marks J. 2017. Is Science Racist? Malden, MA: Polity
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Martin JT. 2018. Police and policing. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 47:133–48
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Mauss M. 1973. Techniques of the body. Econ. Soc. 2:170–88
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Maxwell A. 2013. Modern anthropology and the problem of the racial type: the photographs of Franz Boas. Vis. Comm. 12:1123–42
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Mazzarella W. 2003. Shoveling Smoke: Advertising and Globalization in Contemporary India Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  102. McKern WC. 1939. The Midwestern taxonomic method as an aid to archaeological culture study. Am. Antiq. 4:4301–13
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Merleau-Ponty M. 2002. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception, transl D Landes London/New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Merry SE. 2016. The Seductions of Quantification: Measuring Human Rights, Gender Violence, and Sex Trafficking Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Miller D. 1997. Capitalism: An Ethnographic Approach Oxford, UK: Berg
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Mirzoeff N. 2009. An Introduction to Visual Culture London: Routledge. , 2nd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Mitchell WJT. 2005. What Do Pictures Want?: The Lives and Loves of Images Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Moeran B. 1996. A Japanese Advertising Agency: An Anthropology of Media and Markets Honolulu: Univ. Hawai′i Press
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Morris-Reich A. 2016. Race and Photography: Racial Photography as Scientific Evidence, 1876–1980 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Muholi Z. 2018. Zanele Muholi: Somnyama Ngonyama, Hail the Dark Lioness New York: Aperture
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Murphy KM. 2016. Design and anthropology. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 45:433–49
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Murphy KM. 2017. Fontroversy! or, how to care about the shape of language. Language and Materiality: Ethnographic and Theoretical Explorations JR Cavanaugh, S Shankar 63–86 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. , 1st ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Nelson DM. 2015. Who Counts? The Mathematics of Death and Life after Genocide Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Noble SU. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism New York: NYU Press
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Norton HL, Quillen EE, Bigham AW, Pearson LN, Dunsworth H 2019. Human races are not like dog breeds: refuting a racist analogy. Evol. Educ. Outreach 12:117
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Pálsson G. 2012. Decode me!: Anthropology and personal genomics. Curr. Anthropol. 53:S5S185–95
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Phelan JC, Link BG, Zelner S, Yang LH 2014. Direct-to-consumer racial admixture tests and beliefs about essential racial differences. Soc. Psychol. Q. 77:3296–318
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Pinney C. 1990. Classification and fantasy in the photographic construction of caste and tribe. Vis. Anthropol. 3:2–3259–88
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Pinney C. 2011. Photography and Anthropology London: Reaktion Books
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Poole D. 1997. Vision, Race, and Modernity: A Visual Economy of the Andean Image World Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Poole D. 2005. An excess of description: ethnography, race and visual technologies. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 34:159–79
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Povinelli EA. 2001. Radical worlds: the anthropology of incommensurability and inconceivability. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 30:319–34
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Pugliese J. 2008. Biotypologies of terrorism. Cult. Stud. Rev. 14:249–66
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Pushpamala N, Arni C. 2006. Native Women of South India: Manners and Customs Delhi: Nature Morte
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Ram K, Houston C 2015. Phenomenology in Anthropology: A Sense of Perspective Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Rana JA. 2011. Terrifying Muslims: Race and Labor in the South Asian Diaspora Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Reyes A. 2017. Ontology of fake: discerning the Philippine elite. Signs Soc 5:S1S100–27
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Roberts DE. 2012. Fatal Invention: How Science, Politics, and Big Business Re-Create Race in the Twenty-First Century New York: New Press
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Rosa J, Díaz V. 2020. Raciontologies: rethinking anthropological accounts of institutional racism and enactments of white supremacy in the United States. Am. Anthropol. 122:1120–32
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Rouse I. 1960. The classification of artifacts in archaeology. Am. Antiq. 25:3313–23
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Sadre-Orafai S. 2012. The figure of the model and reality television. Fashioning Models: Image, Text, and Industry J Entwistle, E Wissinger 119–33 London: Berg
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Sadre-Orafai S. 2019. Mugshot/head shot: danger, beauty, and the temporal politics of booking photography. Fashion Crimes: Dressing for Deviance J Turney 45–58 London: Bloomsbury
     [Google Scholar]
  133. Schutz A. 1972. The Phenomenology of the Social World Evanston, IL: Northwest. Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Segal DA. 1999. Can you tell a Jew when you see one? or thoughts on meeting Barbra/Barbie at the museum. Judaism 48:2234–41
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Shankar S. 2015. Advertising Diversity: Ad Agencies and the Creation of Asian American Consumers Durham, NC/London: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Simmel G. 1981. On visual interaction. Social Psychology through Symbolic Interaction GP Stone, HA Farberman300–3 New York: Wiley
     [Google Scholar]
  137. Spaulding AC. 1953. Statistical techniques for the discovery of artifact types. Am. Antiq. 18:4305–13
     [Google Scholar]
  138. Stojanowski CM. 2018. Ancient migrations: biodistance, genetics, and the persistence of typological thinking. Bioarchaeologists Speak Out: Deep Time Perspectives on Contemporary Issues JE Buikstra 181–200 Cham, Switz.: Springer Int.
     [Google Scholar]
  139. Strmic-Pawl HV, Jackson BA, Garner S 2018. Race counts: racial and ethnic data on the U.S. Census and the implications for tracking inequality. Soc. Race Ethn. 4:11–13
     [Google Scholar]
  140. Suchman L, Trigg R, Blomberg J 2002. Working artefacts: ethnomethods of the prototype. Br. J. Soc. 53:2163–79
     [Google Scholar]
  141. Sullivan AP, Rozen KC. 1985. Debitage analysis and archaeological interpretation. Am. Antiq. 50:4755–79
     [Google Scholar]
  142. TallBear K. 2013. Native American DNA: Tribal Belonging and the False Promise of Genetic Science Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  143. Torres JB. 2019. Race, rare genetic variants, and the science of human difference in the post‐genomic age. Transform. Anthropol. 27:137–49
     [Google Scholar]
  144. Valentine D. 2007. Imagining Transgender: An Ethnography of a Category Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  145. Vergunst J. 2017. Key figure of mobility: the pedestrian. Soc. Anthropol. 25:113–27
     [Google Scholar]
  146. Wailoo K, Nelson A, Lee C 2012. Genetics and the Unsettled Past: The Collision of DNA, Race, and History New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers
     [Google Scholar]
  147. Weismantel MJ. 2001. Cholas and Pishtacos: Stories of Race and Sex in the Andes Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  148. Whittaker JC, Caulkins D, Kamp KA 1998. Evaluating consistency in typology and classification. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 5:2129–64
     [Google Scholar]
  149. Wortham S. 2003. Accomplishing identity in participant-denoting discourse. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 13:2189–210
     [Google Scholar]
  150. Zedeño MN. 2009. Animating by association: index objects and relational taxonomies. Camb. Archaeol. J. 19:3407–17
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011235
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error