Citation is a foundational dimension of human language and social life. Citational practices attribute utterances to distinct speakers, beings, or texts. They also connect temporalities, joining past, present, and future discourses, documents, and performance practices. In so doing, citational practices play a pivotal role in linking particular articulations of subjectivity to wider formations of cultural knowledge and authority. We explore how this linkage operates via production formats, participant structures, genre conventions, and ideologies of personhood. We then consider approaches to citation in the domain of legal discourse, an arena that relies on specific, patterned forms of citation that are historically rooted, institutionally perpetuated, and subjectively reenacted.

Keyword(s): genreinterdiscursivitylaw

Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Literature Cited

  1. Agha A. 1995. Process and personality. Semiotica 107:125–46 [Google Scholar]
  2. Agha A. 2005. Voice, footing, enregisterment. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 15:38–59 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakhtin MM. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays transl M Holquist. Austin: Univ. Tex. Press [Google Scholar]
  4. Bakhtin MM. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics transl. C Emerson Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakhtin MM. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays transl. VW McGee Austin: Univ. Tex. Press [Google Scholar]
  6. Barber K. 1999. Quotation in the constitution of Yorùbá oral texts. Res. Afr. Lit. 30:17–41 [Google Scholar]
  7. Barber K. 2008. The Anthropology of Texts, Persons and Publics: Oral and Written Culture in Africa and Beyond New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  8. Bauman R. 1991. Contextualization, tradition and the dialogue of genres: Icelandic legends of the Kraftaskáld. Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon C Goodwin, A Duranti 125–45 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  9. Bauman R. 2004. A World of Others' Words: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Intertextuality Malden, MA: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  10. Bauman R. 2005. Indirect indexicality, identity, performance: dialogic observations. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 15:145–50 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bauman R, Briggs CL. 1990. Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 19:59–88 [Google Scholar]
  12. Benveniste É. 1971. Problems in General Linguistics transl. ME Meek Coral Gables, FL: Univ. Miami Press [Google Scholar]
  13. Bielo JS. 2009. Words upon the Word: An Ethnography of Evangelical Group Bible Study New York: N.Y. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  14. Bourdieu P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  15. Bourdieu P. 1990 (1980). The Logic of Practice Cambridge, UK: Polity [Google Scholar]
  16. Bourdieu P, Darbel A, Rivet JP, Seibel C. 1963. Travail et travailleurs en Algérie Paris: Mouton [Google Scholar]
  17. Bourdieu P, Sayad A. 1964. Le Déracinement: La crise de l'agriculture traditionnelle en Algérie Paris: Minuit [Google Scholar]
  18. Bowen JR. 1991. Sumatran Politics and Poetics: Gayo History, 1900–1989 New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  19. Briggs CL. 1988. Competence in Performance: The Creativity of Tradition in Mexicano Verbal Art Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press [Google Scholar]
  20. Briggs CL, Bauman R. 1992. Genre, intertextuality, and social power. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 2:131–72 [Google Scholar]
  21. Briggs CL, Bauman R. 2005. Voices of Modernity: Language Ideologies and the Politics of Inequality Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  22. Burns RP. 2009. The Death of the American Trial Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  23. Cole CM. 2010. Performing South Africa's Truth Commission: Stages of Transition Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  24. Conley JM, O'Barr WM. 1990. Rules versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  25. Conley JM, O'Barr WM. 2005. Just Words: Law, Language, and Power Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  26. Crapanzano V. 2000. Serving the Word: Literalism in America from the Pulpit to the Bench New York: New Press [Google Scholar]
  27. Dorsett S, McVeigh S. 2012. Jurisdiction New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  28. Eisenlohr P. 2010. Materialities of entextualization: the domestication of sound reproduction in Mauritian Muslim devotional practices. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 20:314–33 [Google Scholar]
  29. Finnegan R. 2011. Why Do We Quote?: The Culture and History of Quotation Cambridge, UK: Open Book [Google Scholar]
  30. Giordano C. 2008. Practices of translation and the making of migrant subjectivities in contemporary Italy. Am. Ethnol. 35:588–606 [Google Scholar]
  31. Goffman E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience Boston, MA: Northeast. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  32. Goffman E. 1979. Footing. Semiotica 25:1–21–29 [Google Scholar]
  33. Goffman E. 1981. Forms of Talk Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press [Google Scholar]
  34. Goodman JE. 2003. The proverbial Bourdieu: habitus and the politics of representation in the ethnography of Kabylia. Am. Anthropol. 105:782–93 [Google Scholar]
  35. Goodman JE. 2005. Berber Culture on the World Stage: From Village to Video Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  36. Graham LR. 1995. Performing Dreams: Discourses of Immortality among the Xavante of Central Brazil Austin: Univ. Tex. Press [Google Scholar]
  37. Harding SF. 2000. The Book of Jerry Falwell: Fundamentalist Language and Politics Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  38. Hastings A, Manning P. 2004. Introduction: acts of alterity. Lang. Commun. 24:291–311 [Google Scholar]
  39. Haviland JB. 1996. Projections, transpositions and relativity. Rethinking Linguistic Relativity J Gumperz, S Levinson 271–323 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  40. Haviland JB. 2005. “Whorish old man” and “one (animal) gentleman”: the intertextual construction of enemies and selves. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 15:81–94 [Google Scholar]
  41. Hill JH, Irvine JT. 1992. Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  42. Hill JH, Zepeda O. 1992. Mrs. Patricio's trouble: the distribution of responsibility in an account of personal experience. See Hill & Irvine 1992 197–225
  43. Hull M. 2012a. Documents and bureaucracy. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 41:251–67 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hull M. 2012b. Government of Paper. The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  45. Irvine JT. 1992. Insult and responsibility: verbal abuse in a Wolof village. See Hill & Irvine 1992 105–34
  46. Irvine JT. 1996. Shadow conversations: the indeterminacy of participant roles. See Silverstein & Urban 1996 131–59
  47. Kapchan D. 2005. Gender on the Market: Moroccan Women and the Revoicing of Tradition Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press [Google Scholar]
  48. Keane W. 1999. Voice. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 9:271–73 [Google Scholar]
  49. Keller E. 2005. The Road to Clarity: Seventh-day Adventism in Madagascar New York: Palgrave Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  50. Keller E. 2006. Scripture study as normal science: Seventh-day Adventist practice on the east coast of Madagascar. The Anthropology of Christianity F Cannell 273–94 Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  51. Kroskrity P. 1992. Arizona Tewa Kiva speech as a manifestation of linguistic ideology. Pragmatics 2:3297–309 [Google Scholar]
  52. Kroskrity P. 2009. Narrative reproductions: ideologies of storytelling, authoritative words, and generic regimentation in the village of Tewa. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 19:40–56 [Google Scholar]
  53. Latour B. 2010. The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d'Etat transl. M Brilman, A Pottage Cambridge, UK: Polity [Google Scholar]
  54. Lee B. 1997. Talking Heads: Language, Metalanguage, and the Semiotics of Subjectivity Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  55. Levinson SC. 1988. Putting linguistics on a proper footing: explorations in Goffman's concepts of participation. Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order P Drew, A Wootton 161–227 Cambridge, UK: Polity [Google Scholar]
  56. Matoesian GM. 2001. Law and the Language of Identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith Rape Trial New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  57. Mawani R. 2012. Law's Archive. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 8:337–65 [Google Scholar]
  58. Merry SE. 2006. Transnational human rights and local activism: mapping the middle. Am. Anthropol. 108:38–51 [Google Scholar]
  59. Mertz E. 1996. Recontextualization as socialization: texts and pragmatics in the law school classroom. See Silverstein & Urban 1996 229–49
  60. Mertz E. 2007. The Language of Law School: Learning to “Think Like a Lawyer.” New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  61. Mertz E, Weissbourd B. 1985. Legal ideology and linguistic theory: variability and its limits. Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives E Mertz, R Parmentier 261–85 New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
  62. Nakassis CV. 2012. Brand, citationality, performativity. Am. Anthropol. 114:624–38 [Google Scholar]
  63. Ng KH. 2009. The Common Law in Two Voices: Language, Law, and the Postcolonial Dilemma in Hong Kong Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  64. Ochs E, Capps L. 2001. Living Narrative: Creating Lives in Everyday Storytelling Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  65. Philips SU. 1982. The language socialization of lawyers: acquiring the ‘cant.’. Doing the Ethnography of Schooling: Educational Anthropology in Action GD Spindler 179–209 New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston [Google Scholar]
  66. Philips SU. 1983. The Invisible Culture: Communication in Classroom and Community on the Warm Springs Indian Reservation New York: Longman [Google Scholar]
  67. Raheja GG. 1996. Caste, colonialism, and the speech of the colonized: entextualization and disciplinary control in India. Am. Ethnol. 23:494–513 [Google Scholar]
  68. Richland JB. 2008. Arguing with Tradition: The Language of Law in Hopi Tribal Court Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  69. Richland JB. 2013. Jurisdiction: grounding law in language. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 42:209–26 [Google Scholar]
  70. Riles A. 2006. Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press [Google Scholar]
  71. Shoaps R. 2002. “Pray earnestly”: the textual construction of personal involvement in Pentecostal prayer and song. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 12:34–71 [Google Scholar]
  72. Shuman A. 1992. “Get outta my face”: entitlement and authoritative discourse. See Hill & Irvine 1992 135–60
  73. Silverstein M, Urban G. 1996. Natural Histories of Discourse Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  74. Tannen D. 2007. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  75. Taylor D. 2003. The Archive and the Repertoire: Performing Cultural Memory in the Americas Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  76. Tomlinson M. 2010. Compelling replication: Genesis 1:26, John 3:16, and biblical politics in Fiji. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 16:743–60 [Google Scholar]
  77. Tomlinson M. 2011. The true me: individualism and biblical types in Fijian Methodism. Managing Modernity in the Western Pacific M Macintyre, M Patterson 147–71 St. Lucia, Aust: Univ. Qld. Press [Google Scholar]
  78. Urban G. 1989. The “I” of discourse. Semiotics, Self, and Society B Lee, G Urban 27–51 Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
  79. Vismann C. 2008. Files: Law and Media Technology transl. G Winthrop-Young Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  80. Voloshinov VN. 1973. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language transl. L Matejka, IR Titunik Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  81. Wilce J. 2005. Traditional laments and postmodern regrets: the circulation of discourse in metacultural context. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 15:60–71 [Google Scholar]
  82. Yankah K. 1995. Speaking for the Chief: Okyeame and the Politics of Akan Royal Oratory Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error