1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Anthropology
  4. Volume 43, 2014
  5. Article

Annual Review of Anthropology

Volume 43, 2014

Semiotic Dimensions of Creativity*

Abstract

Recurrent, most recently Romantic, ideologies conceptualize creativity as the solitary, ex nihilo creation of products of self-evident and universal value—most emblematically in the field of art—by highly exceptional individuals. Such ideologies obscure the social dimensions of creativity that come into view via anthropological analysis: () the nature and ubiquity of creative processes as communicative and improvisational events, with real-time emergent properties, involving human and nonhuman agents in the context of pre-existing yet malleable genres and constraints; () the role of socialization in the making of creative individuals, implicating processes of social reproduction; and () the processes by which certain objects and individuals are recognized and constructed as exemplars of creativity and thus acquire their value. This review discusses these dimensions by synthesizing cultural and linguistic/semiotic anthropological research. It concludes by addressing the recent transformation of creativity into the neoliberal philosopher's stone and the potential contribution of anthropology to the demystification of this transformation.

Keyword(s): creativity, improvisation, neoliberalism, semiotic mediation, socialization, value
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030020
2014-10-21
2024-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/anthro/43/1/annurev-anthro-102313-030020.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030020&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abrams MH. 1971. The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  2. Agha A. 2007. Language and Social Relations Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  3. Agrama HA. 2010. Ethics, tradition, authority: toward an anthropology of the fatwa. Am. Ethnol. 37:12–18 [Google Scholar]
  4. Appadurai A. 1986. Introduction: commodities and the politics of value. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective A Appadurai 3–63 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  5. Atkins ET. 2001. Blue Nippon: Authenticating Jazz in Japan Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  6. Bakhtin MM. 1982. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays Austin: Univ. Tex. Press [Google Scholar]
  7. Barrett FJ. 1998. Creativity and improvisation in jazz and organizations: implications for organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 9:5605–22 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bateson G. 1967. Steps to an Ecology of Mind New York: Ballantine [Google Scholar]
  9. Baudrillard J. 1981a. Gesture and signature: semiurgy in contemporary art. For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign102–11 St. Louis, MO: Telos [Google Scholar]
  10. Baudrillard J. 1981b. The art auction: sign exchange and sumptuary value. For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign112–22 St. Louis, MO: Telos [Google Scholar]
  11. Bauman R. 1984. Verbal Art as Performance Long Grove, IL: Waveland [Google Scholar]
  12. Bauman R, Briggs CL. 1990. Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 19:59–88 [Google Scholar]
  13. Becker HS. 1982. Art Worlds Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  14. Benjamin W. 1969. The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. Illuminations H Arendt 217–52 New York: Schocken [Google Scholar]
  15. Berliner P. 1994. Thinking in Jazz: The Infinite Art of Improvisation Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  16. Black SP. 2008. Creativity and learning jazz: the practice of “listening.”. Mind Cult. Act. 15:4279–95 [Google Scholar]
  17. Boas F. 1955. Primitive Art London: Dover [Google Scholar]
  18. Bourdieu P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  19. Bourdieu P. 1980. The aristocracy of culture. Media, Cult. Soc. 2:225–54 [Google Scholar]
  20. Bourdieu P. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production New York: Columbia Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  21. Briggs CL. 1988. Competence in Performance: The Creativity of Tradition in Mexicano Verbal Art Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press [Google Scholar]
  22. Briggs CL, Bauman R. 1992. Genre, intertextuality, and social power. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 2:2131–72 [Google Scholar]
  23. Bryant R. 2005. The soul danced into the body: nation and improvisation in Istanbul. Am. Ethnol. 32:2222–38 [Google Scholar]
  24. Carr ES. 2010. Enactments of expertise. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 39:17–32 [Google Scholar]
  25. Christopherson RW. 1974. From folk art to fine art: a transformation in the meaning of photographic work. J. Contemp. Ethnogr. 3:2123–57 [Google Scholar]
  26. Chumley LH. 2013. Evaluation regimes and the qualia of quality. Anthropol. Theory 13:1/2169–83 [Google Scholar]
  27. Colapietro VM. 1988. Peirce's Approach to the Self: A Semiotic Perspective on Human Subjectivity Albany, NY: State Univ. N.Y. Press [Google Scholar]
  28. Comaroff JL, Comaroff J. 1992. Bodily reform as historical practice. Ethnography and the Historical Imagination69–91 Boulder, CO: Westview [Google Scholar]
  29. Coote J, Shelton A. 1994. Anthropology, Art and Aesthetics Oxford, UK: Clarendon [Google Scholar]
  30. Csikszentmihalyi M. 1996. Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention New York: Harper Collins [Google Scholar]
  31. Csordas TJ. 1997. Language, Charisma, and Creativity: The Ritual Life of a Religious Movement Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  32. Downey G. 2008. Scaffolding imitation in capoeira: physical education and enculturation in an Afro-Brazilian art. Am. Anthropol. 110:2204–13 [Google Scholar]
  33. Duranti A, Black SP. 2011. Language socialization and verbal improvisation. The Handbook of Language Socialization A Duranti, E Ochs, BB Schieffelin 443–63 London: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  34. Duranti A, Burrell K. 2004. Jazz improvisation: a search for inner harmonies and a unique self. Ricerche Psicologia 27:371–101 [Google Scholar]
  35. Duranti A, Brenneis D. 1986. Special Issue: The Audience as Co-Author. Text Talk 6:3 [Google Scholar]
  36. Efland AD. 1990. A History of Art Education: Intellectual and Social Currents in Teaching the Visual Arts New York: Teachers College Press [Google Scholar]
  37. Elkins J. 2009. Artists with PhDs: On the New Doctoral Degree in Studio Art Washington, DC: New Academia [Google Scholar]
  38. Farnell B, Wood RN. 2011. Performing precision and the limits of observation. Redrawing Anthropology: Materials, Movements, Lines T Ingold 91–114 Farnham, UK: Ashgate [Google Scholar]
  39. Ferguson JM. 2010. Another country is the past: Western cowboys, Lanna nostalgia, and bluegrass aesthetics as performed by professional musicians in Northern Thailand. Am. Ethnol. 37:2227–40 [Google Scholar]
  40. Finnegan R. 1988. Literacy and Orality Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  41. Florida R. 2003. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community, and Everyday Life New York: Basic [Google Scholar]
  42. Gal S. 2002. A semiotics of the public/private distinction. Differences 13:177–95 [Google Scholar]
  43. Gell A. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  44. Gershon I. 2011. Neoliberal agency. Curr. Anthropol. 52:4537–55 [Google Scholar]
  45. Gioia T. 1988. Jazz and the primitivist myth. The Imperfect Art: Reflections on Jazz and Modern Culture19–49 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  46. Glaskin K. 2010. On dreams, innovation and the emerging genre of the individual artist. Anthropol. Forum 20:3251–67 [Google Scholar]
  47. Goffman E. 1986. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience Boston: Northeast. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  48. Goldstein C. 1996. Teaching Art: Academies and Schools from Vasari to Albers Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  49. Goodwin C. 1994. Professional vision. Am. Anthropol. 96:3606–33 [Google Scholar]
  50. Grazian D. 2005. Blue Chicago: The Search for Authenticity in Urban Blues Clubs Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  51. Hallam E, Ingold T. 2007. Creativity and Cultural Improvisation Oxford, UK: Berg [Google Scholar]
  52. Hammer J. 2012. The greatest fake-art scam in history?. Vanity Fair Oct. 10. http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2012/10/wolfgang-beltracchi-helene-art-scam [Google Scholar]
  53. Harkness N. 2013. Softer soju in South Korea. Anthropol. Theory 13:1/212–30 [Google Scholar]
  54. Heath SB. 1986. What no bedtime story means: narrative skills at home and school. Language Socialization across Cultures BB Schieffelin, E Ochs 97–124 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  55. Herzfeld M. 2003. The Body Impolitic: Artisans and Artifice in the Global Hierarchy of Value Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  56. Hirsch E, Strathern M. 2005. Transactions and Creations: Property Debates and the Stimulus of Melanesia Oxford, UK: Berghahn [Google Scholar]
  57. Hirschkind C. 2006. The Ethical Soundscape: Cassette Sermons and Islamic Counterpublics New York: Columbia Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  58. Ho K. 2009. Liquidated: An Ethnography of Wall Street Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  59. Howard KM. 2009. Breaking in and spinning out: repetition and decalibration in Thai children's play genres. Lang. Soc. 38:3339–63 [Google Scholar]
  60. Ingold T. 2007. Lines: A Brief History London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  61. Ingold T, Hallam E. 2007. Creativity and cultural improvisation: an introduction. See Hallam & Ingold 2007 1–24
  62. Isaacson W. 2011. The genius of Jobs. New York Times Oct. 30, p. SR1 [Google Scholar]
  63. Jones GM. 2011. Trade of the Tricks: Inside the Magician's Craft Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  64. Kant I. 2008 [1790]. Critique of the Power of Judgment Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  65. Karpik L. 2010. Valuing the Unique: The Economics of Singularities Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  66. Keane W. 1997. Signs of Recognition: Powers and Hazards of Representation in an Indonesian Society Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  67. Kingsbury H. 2001. Music, Talent, & Performance: A Conservatory Cultural System Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  68. Knorr Cetina K. 1997. Sociality with objects: social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Cult. Soc. 14:41–30 [Google Scholar]
  69. Kockelman P. 2012. Agent, Person, Subject, Self: A Theory of Ontology, Interaction, and Infrastructure Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  70. Kondo DK. 1990. Crafting Selves: Power, Gender, and Discourses of Identity in a Japanese Workplace Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  71. Kopytoff I. 1986. The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective A Appadurai 64–91 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  72. Kripke SA. 1980. Naming and Necessity Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  73. Lareau A. 2003. Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  74. Latour B, Woolgar S. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  75. Lave J, Wenger E. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  76. Lavie S, Narayan K, Rosaldo R. 1993. Introduction: creativity in anthropology. Creativity/Anthropology S Lavie, K Narayan, R Rosaldo 1–8 Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  77. Leach J. 2007. Creativity, subjectivity, and the dynamic of possessive individualism. See Hallam & Ingold 2007 99–116
  78. Lee B. 1997. Talking Heads: Language, Metalanguage, and the Semiotics of Subjectivity Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  79. Lemke JL. 2000. Across the scales of time: artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind Cult. Act. 7:4273–90 [Google Scholar]
  80. Lévi-Strauss C. 1966. The Savage Mind Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  81. Liep J. 2001. Introduction. Locating Cultural Creativity J Liep 1–13 London: Pluto Press [Google Scholar]
  82. Lord AB. 2003. The Singer of Tales Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  83. Mageo J. 2010. Race, gender, and ‘foreign exchange’ in Samoan performing arts. Anthropol. Forum 20:3269–89 [Google Scholar]
  84. Mahmood S. 2005. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  85. Malaby TM. 2002. Odds and ends: risk, mortality, and the politics of contingency. Cult. Med. Psychiatry 26:3283–312 [Google Scholar]
  86. Mall AS. 2007. Structure, innovation and agency in pattern construction: the Kolam of Southern India. See Hallam & Ingold 2007 55–78
  87. Manning P. 2010. The semiotics of brand. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 39:33–49 [Google Scholar]
  88. Marx K. 1978. Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. The Marx-Engels Reader RC Tucker 66–125 New York: Norton [Google Scholar]
  89. Mauss M. 2000. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies New York: Norton [Google Scholar]
  90. McDermott R. 2004. Materials for a confrontation with genius as a personal identity. Ethos 32:2278–88 [Google Scholar]
  91. McGurl M. 2011. The Program Era: Postwar Fiction and the Rise of Creative Writing Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  92. McLean S. 2009. Stories and cosmogonies: imagining creativity beyond “nature” and “culture.”. Cult. Anthropol. 24:2213–45 [Google Scholar]
  93. Mills CW. 1940. Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. Am. Soc. Rev. 5:6904–13 [Google Scholar]
  94. Monson I. 1996. Saying Something: Jazz Improvisation and Interaction Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  95. Muehlebach A, Shoshan N. 2012. Introduction. Anthropol. Q. 85:2317–44 [Google Scholar]
  96. Munn ND. 1992. The Fame of Gawa: A Symbolic Study of Value Transformation in a Massim Society (Papua New Guinea Society) Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  97. Murphy KM. 2005. Collaborative imagining: the interactive use of gestures, talk, and graphic representation in architectural practice. Semiotica 156:113–45 [Google Scholar]
  98. Murray P. 1989. Poetic genius and its classical origins. Genius: The History of an Idea P Murray 9–31 Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  99. Myers FR. 2002. Introduction: the empire of things. The Empire of Things: Regimes of Value and Material Culture FR Myers 3–64 Santa Fe, NM: Sch. Am. Res. Press [Google Scholar]
  100. Myers N, Dumit J. 2011. Haptic creativity and the mid-embodiments of experimental life. A Companion to the Anthropology of the Body and Embodiment FE Mascia-Lees 239–61 New York: Wiley-Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  101. Nakamura F. 2007. Creating or performing words? Observations on contemporary Japanese calligraphy. See Hallam & Ingold 2007 79–98
  102. Nakassis CV. 2012. Brand, citationality, performativity. Am. Anthropol. 114:4624–38 [Google Scholar]
  103. Nettl B. 1995. Heartland Excursions: Ethnomusicological Reflections on Schools of Music Urbana: Univ. Ill. Press [Google Scholar]
  104. Nettl B, Russell M. 1998. In the Course of Performance: Studies in the World of Musical Improvisation Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  105. Orta A. 2013. Managing the margins: MBA training, international business, and “the value chain of culture.”. Am. Ethnol. 40:4689–703 [Google Scholar]
  106. Parmentier RJ. 1994. Signs in Society: Studies in Semiotic Anthropology Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  107. Peirce CS. 1955. Logic as semiotic: the theory of signs. Philosophical Writings of Peirce J Buchler 98–119 London: Dover [Google Scholar]
  108. Plattner S. 1998. A most ingenious paradox: the market for contemporary fine art. Am. Anthropol. 100:2482–93 [Google Scholar]
  109. Polanyi M. 2009. The Tacit Dimension Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  110. Rogoff B. 1990. Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  111. Rosaldo R. 1986. Ilongot hunting as story and experience. The Anthropology of Experience VW Turner, EM Bruner 97–138 Urbana: Univ. Ill. Press [Google Scholar]
  112. Rose M. 1993. Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  113. Rustin NT, Tucker S. 2008. Big Ears: Listening for Gender in Jazz Studies Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  114. Sahlins MD. 1985. Islands of History Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  115. Sawyer KR. 1996. The semiotics of improvisation: the pragmatics of musical and verbal performance. Semiotica 108:3–4269–306 [Google Scholar]
  116. Sawyer KR. 2003. Group Creativity: Music, Theater, Collaboration Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
  117. Sawyer KR. 2013. Zig Zag: The Surprising Path to Greater Creativity San Francisco: Jossey-Bass [Google Scholar]
  118. Schieffelin EL. 1985. Performance and the cultural construction of reality. Am. Ethnol. 12:4707–24 [Google Scholar]
  119. Selfridge-Field E. 2001. Composition, combinatorics, and simulation: a historical and philosophical enquiry. Virtual Music: Computer Synthesis of Musical Style D Cope 187–219 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  120. Sherzer J. 2002. Speech Play and Verbal Art Austin: Univ. Texas Press [Google Scholar]
  121. Silverstein M. 1993. Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics J Lucy 33–58 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  122. Silverstein M. 1997. The Improvisational performance of culture in realtime discursive practice. Creativity in Performance KR Sawyer 265–312 Greenwich, CT: Ablex [Google Scholar]
  123. Silverstein M. 2005. Axes of evals: token versus type interdiscursivity. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 15:16–22 [Google Scholar]
  124. Silverstein M. 2013. Discourse and the no-thing-ness of culture. Signs Soc. 1:2327–66 [Google Scholar]
  125. Singerman H. 1999. Art Subjects: Making Artists in the American University Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  126. Solis G, Nettl B. 2009. Musical Improvisation: Art, Education, and Society Urbana: Univ. Ill. Press [Google Scholar]
  127. Starrett G. 1995. The hexis of interpretation: Islam and the body in the Egyptian popular school. Am. Ethnol. 22:4953–69 [Google Scholar]
  128. Suchman LA. 2007. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  129. Taussig M. 1993. Mimesis and Alterity: A Particular History of the Senses New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  130. Taylor C. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  131. Thomas K. 2012. Intellectual property law and the ethics of imitation in Guatemala. Anthropol. Q. 85:3758–815 [Google Scholar]
  132. Turner V. 1967. Betwixt and between: the liminal period in rites of passage. The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual93–111 Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  133. Turner V. 1979. Variations on a theme of liminality. Secular Ritual SF Moore, B Myerhoff 36–52 Amsterdam: Van Gorcum [Google Scholar]
  134. Urban G. 1996. Entextualization, replication, and power. Natural Histories of Discourse M Silverstein, G Urban 21–44 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  135. Vann EF. 2006. The limits of authenticity in Vietnamese consumer markets. Am. Anthropol. 108:2286–96 [Google Scholar]
  136. Wagner R. 1981. The Invention of Culture Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  137. Weber M. 1978. Charisma and its transformations. Economy and Society1111–57 Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  138. Weiner AB. 1992. Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  139. Wilf E. 2010. Swinging within the Iron Cage: modernity, creativity, and embodied practice in American postsecondary jazz education. Am. Ethnol. 37:3563–82 [Google Scholar]
  140. Wilf E. 2011. Sincerity versus self-expression: modern creative agency and the materiality of semiotic forms. Cult. Anthropol. 26:3462–84 [Google Scholar]
  141. Wilf E. 2012. Rituals of creativity: tradition, modernity, and the “acoustic unconscious” in a U.S. collegiate jazz music program. Am. Anthropol. 114:132–44 [Google Scholar]
  142. Wilf E. 2013a. From media technologies that reproduce Seconds to media technologies that reproduce Thirds: a Peircean perspective on stylistic fidelity and style-reproducing computerized algorithms. Signs Soc. 2:1185–211 [Google Scholar]
  143. Wilf E. 2013b. Sociable robots, jazz music, and divination: contingency as a cultural resource for negotiating problems of intentionality. Am. Ethnol. 40:4605–18 [Google Scholar]
  144. Wilf E. 2013c. Streamlining the muse: creative agency and the reconfiguration of charismatic education as professional training in Israeli poetry writing workshops. Ethos 41:2127–49 [Google Scholar]
  145. Wilf E. 2013d. Toward an anthropology of computer-mediated, algorithmic forms of sociality. Curr. Anthropol. 54:6716–39 [Google Scholar]
  146. Wilf E. 2014. School for Cool: The Academic Jazz Program and the Paradox of Institutionalized Creativity Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  147. Wilf E. 2015. The ‘cool’ organization man: incorporating uncertainty from jazz music into the business world. Modes of Uncertainty: Anthropological Cases P Rabinow, L Samimian-Darash Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  148. Willis P. 1981. Learning to Labor: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs New York: Columbia Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  149. Woodmansee M. 1996. Genius and the copyright. The Author, Art, and the Market: Rereading the History of Aesthetics35–56 New York: Columbia Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  150. Wortham SEF. 2005. Learning Identity: The Joint Emergence of Social Identification and Academic Learning Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  151. Young E. 1759. Conjectures on Original Composition London: Miller [Google Scholar]
  152. Zelizer VA. 1994. Pricing the Priceless Child: The Changing Social Value of Children Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030020
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error