1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Anthropology
  4. Volume 47, 2018
  5. Article

Annual Review of Anthropology

Volume 47, 2018

Ethics of Archaeology

Abstract

Ethics has abandoned its niche status to become a shared concern across archaeology. The appraisal of the sociopolitical context of archaeological practice since the 1980s has forced the discipline to take issue with the expanding array of ethical questions raised by work with living people. Thus, the original foci on the archaeological record, conservation, and scientific standards, which are behind most deontological codes, have been largely transcended and even challenged. In this line, this review emphasizes philosophical and political aspects over practical ones and examines some pressing ethical concerns that are related to archaeology's greater involvement with contemporary communities, political controversies, and social demands; discussion includes ethical responses to the indigenous critique, the benefits and risks of applied archaeology, the responsibilities of archaeologists in conflict and postconflict situations, vernacular digging and collecting practices, development-led archaeology, heritage, and the ethics of things.

Keyword(s): applied archaeology, CRM, cultural heritage, cultural resources management, indigenous archaeology, looting, postanthropocentrism
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-045825
2018-10-21
2025-04-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/anthro/47/1/annurev-anthro-102317-045825.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-045825&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abu El-Haj N. 2001. Facts on the Ground: Archaeological Practice and Territorial Self-Fashioning in Israeli Society Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alonso González P. 2016. Between certainty and trust: boundary-work and the construction of archaeological epistemic authority. Cult. Sociol. 10:4483–501
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson B, Rojas F 2017. Antiquarianisms: Contact, Conflict, Comparison Oxford, UK: Oxbow
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Antoniadou I. 2009. Reflections on an archaeological ethnography of looting in Kozani, Greece. Public Archaeol 8:2–3246–61
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Arnold B. 1990. The past as propaganda: totalitarian archaeology in Nazi Germany. Antiquity 64:244464–78
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Benso S. 2000. The Face of Things: A Different Side of Ethics Binghamton: State Univ. N.Y. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bernbeck R, Pollock S 2007. ‘Grabe, wo du stehst!’ An archaeology of perpetrators. See Hamilakis & Duke 2007 217–34
  8. Birch SEP 2018. Multispecies Archaeology London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Blau S. 2009. More than just bare bones: ethical considerations for forensic anthropologists. Handbook of Forensic Anthropology and Archaeology S Blau, DH Ubelaker 457–67 London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Boyd B. 2017. Archaeology and human–animal relations: thinking through anthropocentrism. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 46:299–316
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Braidotti R. 2013. The Posthuman Cambridge, UK: Polity
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Brodie N, Renfrew C 2005. Looting and the world's archaeological heritage: the inadequate response. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 34:343–61
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bshara K. 2016. The structures and fractures of heritage protection in Palestine. See Field et al. 2016 106–26
  14. Byrne D. 1995. Buddhist stupa and Thai social practice. World Archaeol 27:2266–81
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Byrne D. 2014. Counterheritage: Critical Perspectives on Heritage Conservation in Asia London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Byrne D. 2016. The problem with looting: an alternative perspective on antiquities trafficking in Southeast Asia. J. Field Archaeol. 41:3344–54
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Chirikure S. 2014. ‘Where angels fear to tread’: ethics, commercial archaeology, and extractive industries in southern Africa. Azania: Archaeol. Res. Afr. 49:2218–31
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Chirikure S. 2015. “Do as I say and not as I do.” On the gap between good ethics and reality in African Archaeology. See Haber & Shepherd 2015 27–37
  19. Colwell-Chanthaphonh C, Ferguson TJ 2008. Collaboration in Archaeological Practice: Engaging Descendant Communities Lanham, MD: Altamira
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Congram D. 2015. Cognitive dissonance and the military-archaeology complex. See González-Ruibal & Moshenska 2015 199–213
  21. Crossland C, Joyce RA 2015. Disturbing Bodies. Perspectives on Forensic Anthropology Santa Fe, NM: Sch. Adv. Res
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Curtoni RP. 2015. Against global archaeological ethics: critical views from South America. See Gnecco & Lippert 2015 41–47
  23. Demoule J-P. 2012. Rescue archaeology: a European view. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 41:611–26
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Derrida J. 1994. Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International, transl. P Kamuf London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Dezhamkhooy M, Yazdi LP, Garazhian O 2015. All our findings are under their boots! The monologue of violence in Iranian archaeology. See González-Ruibal & Moshenska 2015 51–70
  26. Di Giovine MA. 2015. Patrimonial ethics and the field of heritage production. See Gnecco & Lippert 2015 201–27
  27. Domańska E. 2006. The return to things. Archaeol. Polona 44:2171–85
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Doretti M, Fondebrider L 2001. Science and human rights: truth, justice, reparation and reconciliation, a long way in third world countries. Archaeologies of the Contemporary Past V Buchli, G Lucas 138–44 London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Emberling G. 2008. Archaeologists and the military in Iraq, 2003–2008: compromise or contribution?. Archaeologies 4:3445–59
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Escobar A. 1995. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Ferllini R 2007. Forensic Archaeology and Human Rights Violations Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Fernández VM. 2015. Europe: beyond the canon. See Gnecco & Lippert 2015 61–68
  33. Ferrándiz F. 2013. Exhuming the defeated: Civil War mass graves in 21st‐century Spain. Am. Ethnol. 40:138–54
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Ferreira LM. 2010. Aqueología comunitaria, arqueología de contrato y educación patromonial en Brasil. Jangwa Pana 9:195–102
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Ferris N, Welch JR 2015. New worlds: ethics in contemporary North American archaeological practice. See Gnecco & Lippert 2015 69–92
  36. Field L, Gnecco C, Watkins J 2016. Challenging the Dichotomy: The Licit and the Illicit in Archaeological and Heritage Discourses Tucson: Univ. Ariz. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Fowles S. 2016. The perfect subject (postcolonial object studies). J. Mater. Cult. 21:19–27
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Freire-Medeiros B. 2007. A favela que se vê e que se vende: reflexões e polêmicas em torno de um destino turístico. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Soc. 22:6561–72
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Funari PPA. 2003. Dictatorship, democracy, and freedom of expression. Int. J. Hist. Archaeol. 7:3233–37
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Funari PPA, Robrahn-González EM 2008. Ética, capitalismo e arqueologia pública no Brasil. História (São Paulo) 27:213–30
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Geller PL, Stojanowksi CM 2017. The vanishing Black Indian: revisiting craniometry and historic collections. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 162:2267–84
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Giblin JD. 2014. Post-conflict heritage: symbolic healing and cultural renewal. Int. J. Heritage Stud. 20:5500–18
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Giblin JD, King R, Smith B 2014. Introduction: de-centring ethical assumptions by re-centring ethical debate in African archaeology. Azania: Archaeol. Res. Afr. 49:2131–35
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Gill D. 2009. Looting matters for classical antiquities: contemporary issues in archaeological ethics. Present Pasts 1:1 http://doi.org/10.5334/pp.14
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  45. Giraudo RF, Porter BW 2010. Archaeotourism and the crux of development. Anthropol. News 51:87–8
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Gnecco C. 2009. The ways of archaeology: from epistemic violence to relationality. Bol. Mus. Paraense Emílio Goeldi Ciên. Hum. 4:115–26
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Gnecco C. 2013. Digging alternative archaeologies. Reclaiming Archaeology A González-Ruibal 67–78 London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Gnecco C. 2015. An entanglement of sorts: archaeology, ethics, praxis, multiculturalism. See Gnecco & Lippert 2015 1–17
  49. Gnecco C. 2018. Contract archaeology in South America. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 47:279–93
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Gnecco C, Dias AS 2015. Special issue: On contract archaeology. Int. J. Hist. Archaeol. 19:4687–842
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Gnecco C, Lippert D 2015. Ethics and Archaeological Praxis New York: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Gnecco C, Piñacué JC 2016. The (i)llicit, the archaeological: an ethnographic story of profanation. See Field et al. 2016 154–65
  53. González-Ruibal A. 2009. Vernacular cosmopolitanism: an archaeological critique of universalistic reason. Cosmopolitan Archaeologies L Meskell 113–39 Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  54. González-Ruibal A, Alonso González P, Criado-Boado F 2018. Against reactionary populism: toward a new public archaeology. Antiquity 92:507–15
     [Google Scholar]
  55. González-Ruibal A, Ayán Vila X, Caesar R 2015. Ethics, archaeology, and civil conflict: the case of Spain. See González-Ruibal & Moshenska 2015 113–36
  56. González-Ruibal A, Moshenska G 2015. Ethics and the Archaeology of Violence New York: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Grosso JL. 2015. Excess of hospitality: critical semiopraxis and theoretical risks in postcolonial justice. See Haber & Shepherd 2015 79–101
  58. Haber A. 2009. Animism, relatedness, life: Post-Western perspectives. Camb. Archaeol. J. 19:3418–30
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Haber A. 2012. Un-disciplining archaeology. Archaeologies 8:155–66
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Haber A. 2015a. Archaeology after archaeology. See Haber & Shepherd 2015 127–37
  61. Haber A. 2015b. Archaeology and capitalist development: lines of complicity. See Gnecco & Lippert 2015 95–113
  62. Haber A. 2015c. Contratiempo: contract archaeology or a trench in the battle for the dead. Int. J. Hist. Archaeol. 19:4736–47
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Haber A, Shepherd N 2015. After Ethics: Ancestral Voices and Post-Disciplinary Worlds in Archaeology New York: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Hall M, Bombardella P 2005. Las Vegas in Africa. J. Soc. Archaeol. 5:15–24
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Hamilakis Y. 2003. Iraq, stewardship and ‘the record’: an ethical crisis for archaeology. Public Archaeol 3:2104–11
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Hamilakis Y. 2005. Whose world and whose archaeology? The colonial present and the return of the political. Archaeologies 1:294–101
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Hamilakis Y. 2007. From ethics to politics. See Hamilakis & Duke 2007 15–40
  68. Hamilakis Y. 2009. The “War on Terror” and the military–archaeology complex: Iraq, ethics, and neo-colonialism. Archaeologies 5:139–65
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Hamilakis Y. 2015. Archaeology and the logic of capital: pulling the emergency break. Int. J. Hist. Archaeol. 19:4721–35
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Hamilakis Y 2016. Archaeologies of forced and undocumented migration. J. Contemp. Archaeol 32121–39
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Hamilakis Y, Duke P 2007. Archaeology and Capitalism: From Ethics to Politics Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Hardy S. 2015. Virtues impracticable and extremely difficult: the human rights of subsistence diggers. See González-Ruibal & Moshenska 2015 229–39
  73. Harrison R. 2013. Heritage: Critical Approaches London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Harrod RP, Martin DL 2013. Bioarchaeology of Climate Change and Violence: Ethical Considerations New York: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Herrera A. 2015. Archaeology and development: ethics of a fateful relationship. See Haber & Shepherd 2015 39–53
  76. Herzfeld M. 2006. Spatial cleansing: monumental vacuity and the idea of the West. J. Mater. Cult. 11:1–2127–49
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Hodder I. 2014. The asymmetries of symmetrical archaeology. J. Contemp. Archaeol. 1:2228–30
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Hodder I, Lucas G 2017. The symmetries and asymmetries of human–thing relations. A dialogue. Archaeol. Dialogues 24:2119–37
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Hollowell J. 2006. Moral arguments on subsistence digging. See Scarre & Scarre 2006 69–93
  80. Holtorf C. 2005. Beyond crusades: how (not) to engage with alternative archaeologies. World Archaeol 37:4544–51
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Holtorf C. 2009. A European perspective on indigenous and immigrant archaeologies. World Archaeol 41:4672–81
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Hutchings RM, La Salle M 2015. Archaeology as disaster capitalism. Int. J. Hist. Archaeol. 19:4699–720
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Hutchings RM, La Salle M 2017. Archaeology as state heritage crime. Archaeologies 13:166–87
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Innerarity D. 2017. Ethics of Hospitality transl. S Williams, S Champeau. London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Introna LD. 2009. Ethics and the speaking of things. Theory Cult. Soc. 26:425–46
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Ion A. 2016. The body of the martyr. Between an archival exercise and the recovery of his suffering. The need for a recovery of humanity in osteoarchaeology. Archaeol. Dialogues 23:2158–74
     [Google Scholar]
  87. King R, Arthur C 2014. Development-led archaeology and ethics in Lesotho. Azania: Archaeol. Res. Afr. 49:2166–83
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Kleinitz C, Näser C 2011. The loss of innocence: political and ethical dimensions of the Merowe Dam Archaeological Salvage Project at the Fourth Nile Cataract (Sudan). Conserv. Manag. Archaeol. Sites 13:2–3253–80
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Labadi S. 2013. UNESCO, Cultural Heritage, and Outstanding Universal Value: Value-Based Analyses of the World Heritage and Intangible Cultural Heritage Conventions Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Lane P. 2011. Possibilities for a postcolonial archaeology in sub-Saharan Africa: indigenous and usable pasts. World Archaeol 43:17–25
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Levinas E. 1987. Time and the Other, transl. RA Cohen Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Lingis A. 1994. The Community of Those Who Have Nothing in Common Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Little BJ. 2009. What can archaeology do for justice, peace, community, and the earth. Hist. Archaeol. 43:4115–19
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Little BJ, Shackel PA 2007. Archaeology as a Tool of Civic Engagement Lanham, MD: Altamira
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Londoño W. 2016. Fact and law: Guaquería and archaeology in Colombia. See Field et al. 2016 41–55
  96. López Mazz JM. 2015. Archaeology of historical conflicts, colonial oppression, and political violence in Uruguay. See González-Ruibal & Moshenska 2015 71–87
  97. Lydon J, Rizvi U 2010. Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology Lanham, MD: Altamira
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Lynott MJ. 1997. Ethical principles and archaeological practice: development of an ethics policy. Am. Antiquity 62:589–99
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Lynott MJ, Wylie A 1995. Ethics in American Archaeology: Challenges for the 1990s Washington, DC: Soc. Am. Archaeol
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Marciniak A. 2015. Archaeology and ethics: the case of Central-Eastern Europe. See Gnecco & Lippert 2015 49–60
  101. Marín Suárez C, Parga Dans E 2015. Arqueologia de Gestão em Madri: presos pelo modelo de especulação capitalista do território. Rev. Arqueol. 28:2118–38
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Martinón-Torres M. 2002. Defying God and the king: a 17th-century gold rush for ‘megalithic treasure. .’ Public Archaeol 2:4219–35
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Matsuda A. 2016. A consideration of public archaeology theories. Public Archaeol 15:140–49
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Matsuda D. 1998. The ethics of archaeology, subsistence digging, and artifact looting in Latin America: point muted counterpoint. Int. J. Cult. Prop. 7:187–97
     [Google Scholar]
  105. McDavid C, Brock TP 2015. The differing forms of public archaeology: where we have been, where we are now, and thoughts for the future. See Gnecco & Lippert 2015 159–83
  106. McGuire RH. 2008. Archaeology as Political Action Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Meskell L. 2002. The intersections of identity and politics in archaeology. Annu Rev. Anthropol. 31:1279–301
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Meskell L. 2011. The Nature of Heritage: The New South Africa Oxford, UK: Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Meskell L. 2013. UNESCO's World Heritage Convention at 40: challenging the economic and political order of international heritage conservation. Curr. Anthropol. 54:4483–94
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Meskell L, Pels P 2005. Embedding Ethics: Shifting Boundaries of the Anthropological Profession London: Berg
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Moshenska G. 2008. Ethics and ethical critique in the archaeology of modern conflict. Nor. Archaeol. Rev. 41:2159–75
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Moshenska G. 2009. The reburial issue in Britain. Antiquity 83:321815–20
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Mouffe C. 2005. On the Political London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Moya Maleno PR. 2010. Grandezas y miserias de la arqueología de empresa en la España del siglo XXI. Complutum 21:19–26
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Murray T. 2011. Archaeologists and indigenous people: a maturing relationship. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 40:363–78
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Mutua MW. 2001. Savages, victims, and saviors: the metaphor of human rights. Harvard Int. Law J. 42:1201–45
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Nilsson Stutz L. 2013. Claims to the past. A critical view of the arguments driving repatriation of cultural heritage and their role in contemporary identity politics. J. Interv. Statebuilding 7:2170–95
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Olivier L. 2013. Notre passé n'est pas à vendre. Complutum 24:129–39
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Olsen B, Pétursdóttir Þ 2016. Unruly heritage: tracing legacies in the Anthropocene. Arkaeol. Forum 3538–45
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Parker Pearson M. 1995. Ethics and the dead in British archaeology. Field Archaeol 23:17–18
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Parker Pearson M, Schadla-Hall T, Moshenska G 2011. Resolving the human remains crisis in British archaeology. Pap. Inst. Archaeol. 21:5–9
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Pétursdóttir Þ 2012. Small things forgotten now included, or what else do things deserve. Int. J. Hist. Archaeol. 16:3577–603
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Pétursdóttir Þ, Olsen B 2018. Theory adrift: the matter of archaeological theorizing. J. Soc. Archaeol. 18:197–117
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Phillips C, Ross A 2015. Both sides of the ditch: the ethics of narrating the past in the present. See Gnecco & Lippert 2015 27–40
  125. Pollock S. 2016a. Archaeology and contemporary warfare. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 45:215–31
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Pollock S. 2016b. The subject of suffering. Am. Anthropol. 118:4726–41
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Popa CN. 2016. The significant past and insignificant archaeologists. Who informs the public about their ‘national’ past? The case of Romania. Archaeol. Dialog. 23:128–39
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Renfrew C. 2000. Loot, Legitimacy, and Ownership: The Ethical Crisis in Archaeology London: Duckworth
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Renshaw L, Powers N 2016. The archaeology of post-medieval death and burial. Post-Mediev. Archaeol. 50:1159–77
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Ribeiro L. 2015. Development projects, violation of human rights, and the silence of archaeology in Brazil. Int. J. Hist. Archaeol. 19:4810–21
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Rowan Y, Baram U 2004. Marketing Heritage: Archaeology and the Consumption of the Past Lanham, MD: Altamira
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Rush LW. 2015. Partnership versus guns: military advocacy of peaceful approaches for cultural property protection. See González-Ruibal & Moshenska 2015 181–97
  133. Salerno MA, Zarankin A 2015. Discussing the spaces of memory in Buenos Aires: official narratives and the challenges of site management. See González-Ruibal & Moshenska 2015 89–112
  134. Scarre C, Scarre G 2006. The Ethics of Archaeology: Philosophical Perspectives on Archaeological Practice Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Sennett R. 2011. The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism New York: Norton
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Shepherd N. 2002. The politics of archaeology in Africa. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 31:189–209
     [Google Scholar]
  137. Shepherd N. 2015. Undisciplining archaeological ethics. See Haber & Shepherd 2015 11–25
  138. Silberman NA. 2007. ‘Sustainable’ heritage? Public archaeological interpretation and the marketed past. See Hamilakis & Duke 2007 179–93
  139. Silva FA. 2015. Arqueologia de contrato e povos indígenas: reflexões sobre o contexto Brasileiro. Rev. Arqueol. 28:2187–201
     [Google Scholar]
  140. Smith C, Burke H 2003. In the spirit of the code. See Zimmerman et al. 2003 177–97
  141. Smith L. 2006. Uses of Heritage London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  142. Sørensen TF. 2013. We have never been Latourian: archaeological ethics and the posthuman condition. Nor. Archaeol. Rev. 46:11–18
     [Google Scholar]
  143. Starzmann MT. 2008. Cultural imperialism and heritage politics in the event of armed conflict: prospects for an ‘activist archaeology. .’ Archaeologies 4:3368
     [Google Scholar]
  144. Steele C. 2008. Archaeology and the forensic investigation of recent mass graves: ethical issues for a new practice of archaeology. Archaeologies 4:3414–28
     [Google Scholar]
  145. Steinel M. 2015. Archaeology, national socialism and rehabilitation: the case of Herbert Jankuhn (1905–1990). See González-Ruibal & Moshenska 2015 153–65
  146. Stone EC. 2008. Patterns of looting in southern Iraq. Antiquity 82:315125–38
     [Google Scholar]
  147. Stone PG. 2011. Cultural Heritage, Ethics and the Military Rochester, NY: Boydell Press
     [Google Scholar]
  148. Sturdy Colls C. 2015. Holocaust Archaeologies: Approaches and Future Directions New York: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  149. Svestad A. 2013. What happened in Neiden? On the question of reburial ethics. Nor. Archaeol. Rev. 46:2194–222
     [Google Scholar]
  150. Tarlow S. 2001. Decoding ethics. Public Archaeol 1:4245–59
     [Google Scholar]
  151. Tuller H. 2015. Identification versus prosecution: Is it that simple, and where should the archaeologist stand? See Crossland & Joyce 2015, pp. 85–101
  152. Vitelli KD, Colwell-Chanthaphonh JS 2006. Archaeological Ethics Lanham, MD: Altamira
     [Google Scholar]
  153. Watkins J. 2005. Through wary eyes: indigenous perspectives on archaeology. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 34:429–49
     [Google Scholar]
  154. Watkins J. 2015. An indigenous anthropologist's perspective on archaeological ethics. See Gnecco & Lippert 201521–26
  155. Webmoor T, Witmore CL 2008. Things are us! A commentary on human/things relations under the banner of a ‘social’ archaeology. Nor. Archaeol. Rev. 41:153–70
     [Google Scholar]
  156. Witmore C. 2013. Which archaeology?: A question of chronopolitics. Reclaiming Archaeology: Beyond the Tropes of Modernity A González-Ruibal 130–44 London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  157. Wylie A. 2003. On ethics. See Zimmerman et al. 2003 3–16
  158. Wylie A. 2005. The promise and perils of an ethic of stewardship. See Meskell & Pels 2005 47–68
  159. Zimmerman LJ, Vitelli KD, Hollowell JJ 2003. Ethical Issues in Archaeology Lanham, MD: Altamira
     [Google Scholar]
  160. Zorzin N. 2015a. Archaeology and capitalism: successful relationship or economic and ethical alienation? See Gnecco & Lippert 2015, pp. 115–39
  161. Zorzin N. 2015b. Dystopian archaeologies: the implementation of the logic of capital in heritage management. Int. J. Hist. Archaeol. 19:4791–809
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-045825
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error