1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Anthropology
  4. Volume 47, 2018
  5. Article

Annual Review of Anthropology

Volume 47, 2018

Science/Art/Culture Through an Oceanic Lens

Abstract

Since the year 2000, artists have increasingly employed tools, methods, and aesthetics associated with scientific practice to produce forms of art that assert themselves as kinds of experimental and empirical knowledge production parallel to and in critical dialogue with science. Anthropologists, intrigued by the work of art in the age of its technoscientific affiliation, have taken notice. This article discusses bio art, eco art, and surveillance art that have gathered, or might yet reward, anthropological attention, particularly as it might operate as an allied form of cultural critique. We focus on art that takes oceans as its concern, tuning to anthropological interests in translocal connection, climate change, and the politics of the extraterritorial. We end with a call for decolonizing art–science and for an anti-colonial aesthetics of oceanic worlds.

Keyword(s): Anthropocene, art, bio art, eco art, science and technology, surveillance art
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050147
2018-10-21
2024-10-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/anthro/47/1/annurev-anthro-102317-050147.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050147&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abu Hamdan L. 2012. Conflicted Phonemes Tate Modern London: http://lawrenceabuhamdan.com/conflicted-phonemes/
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Adamson J, Evans MM, Stein R 2002. The Environmental Justice Reader: Politics, Poetics, and Pedagogy Tucson: Univ. Ariz. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmett I, Salina T 2015. 1001st Island—The Most Sustainable Island in the Archipelago Film, 14 min, 11s. http://theflameofthepacific.com/portfolio/testing-portfolio-1/
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Anand N. 2017. Hydraulic City: Water and the Infrastructures of Citizenship in Mumbai Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Anker S, Nelkin D 2004. The Molecular Gaze: Art in the Genetic Age Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Appadurai A, Brekenridge C 2009. Foreword. See Mathur & da Cunha 2009 vii–ix
  7. Bakke G, Peterson M 2017a. Anthropology of the Arts: A Reader London: Bloomsbury
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bakke G, Peterson M 2017b. Between Matter and Method: Encounters in Anthropology and Art London: Bloomsbury
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Barbash L, Castaing-Taylor L 1993. In and Out of Africa Film, 60 min Berkeley Media Berkeley, CA:
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Berrigan C. 2012. The life cycle of a common weed: viral imaginings in plant-human encounters. WSQ: Women's Stud. Q. 40:1,297–116
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Biagioli M. 1995. Confabulating Jurassic science. Late Editions 2: Technoscientific Imaginaries: Conversations, Profiles, and Memoirs GE Marcus 399–431 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Biemann U. 2016. Deep weather. GeoHumanities 2:2373–76
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Boas F. 1927. Primitive Art New York: Dover
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Buku-Larrgay Mulka Cent 1999. Saltwater: Yirrkala Bark Paintings of Sea Country—Recognizing Indigenous Sea Rights Yirrkala, Aust./Sydney: Buku-Larrgay Mulka Cent./Jennifer Isaacs Publ.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Bureaud A. 2002. The ethics and aesthetics of biological art. Art Press 276:38–39
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Calzadilla F, Marcus GE 2006. Artists in the field: between art and anthropology. Contemporary Art and Anthropology A Schneider, C Wright 95–116 New York: Berg
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Cent. PostNat. Hist 2017. About Cent. PostNat. Hist. Pittsburgh, PA: http://www.postnatural.org/About
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Chalflin B, Dua J, Rothenberg J, Ben-Yehoyada N 2014. Maritime anthropology revisited Presented at Maritime Anthropol. Roundtable, Annu. Meet. Am. Anthropol. Assoc., 113th Washington, DC:
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Cheetham M. 2018. Landscape into Eco Art: Articulations of Nature since the ’60s Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Clifford J. 1981. On ethnographic surrealism. Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist. 23:4539–64
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Cohen P. 2008. Want to save a coral reef? Bring along your crochet hook. New York Times March 4. https://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/04/arts/design /04crochet.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Crit. Art Ensemble 2000. Digital Resistance: Explorations in Tactical Media Brooklyn, NY: Autonomedia
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Crutzen PJ, Stoermer EF 2000. The Anthropocene. Glob. Change Newsl. 41:17–18
     [Google Scholar]
  24. da Costa B, Philip K 2008. Tactical Biopolitics: Art, Activism, and Technoscience Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Davis H, Turpin E 2015. Art in the Anthropocene: Encounters Among Aesthetics, Politics, Environments, and Epistemologies London: Open Humanit. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  26. De Wolff K 2017. Plastic naturecultures: multispecies ethnography and the dangers of separating living from non-living bodies. Body Soc 23:323–47
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Debatty R, Evans C, Garcia P, Grover A, Thumb 2011. New Art/Science Affinities Pittsburgh, PA: Miller Gallery at Carnegie Mellon Univ. + CMU STUDIO for Creative Inq http://millergallery.cfa.cmu.edu/nasabook/newartscienceaffinities.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  28. deCaires Taylor J. 2018. Overview. Jason deCaires Taylor http://www.underwatersculpture.com/about/overview/
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Decker J 2014. Gyre: The Plastic Ocean London: Booth-Clibborn
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Downey GL, Dumit J, Williams S 1995. Cyborg anthropology. Cult. Anthropol. 10:2264–69
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Dziuban Z 2017. Mapping the “Forensic Turn”: Engagements with Materialities of Mass Death in Holocaust Studies and Beyond Vienna: New Acad. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Enwezor O. 2012. Intense proximity: Guide de l'exposition, Palais de Tokyo Paris: Art Lys
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Erickson R. 2017. Mark Dion: Misadventures of a 21st-Century Naturalist New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Errington S. 1998. The Death of Authentic Primitive Art: And Other Tales of Progress Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Ethnogr. Termin. Collect 2011. Ethnographic Terminalia 2011: Field, Studio Lab. East. Bloc Cent. New Media Interdiscip. Art, Montreal, QC Arlington, VA: Soc. Vis. Anthropol.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Farocki H. 2010. War always finds a way. Gagarin 21:60–72
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Fischer MMJ. 2007a. Culture and cultural analysis as experimental systems. Cult. Anthropol. 22:11–65
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Fischer MMJ. 2007b. Four genealogies for a recombinant anthropology of science and technology. Cult. Anthropol. 22:4539–615
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Fischer MMJ. 2016. SEA STATE: Charles Lim's Video- and Photo-graphic Eye Keynote lect. presented at the Geopolitical and the Biophysical: A Structured Conversation on Art and Southeast Asia in Context, June 17, Natl. Gallery Singap.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Forensic Archit., ed 2014. Forensis: The Architecture of Public Truth Berlin: Sternberg Press
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Fournier A, Lim MY, Parmer A, Wuilfe R 2011. Undercurrents: Experimental Ecosystems in Recent Art Whitney Mus. Am. Art ser New York: Whitney Mus. Am. Art
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Franceschini A. 2017. Seed journey: retracing the path of disappeared seeds. Makery: Media for Labs June 6. http://www.makery.info/en/2017/06/06/seed-journey-sur-la-piste-des-semences-disparues/
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Franklin S. 1995. Science as culture, cultures of science. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 24:163–84
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Franklin S. 2003. Re-thinking nature-culture: anthropology and the new genetics. Anthropol. Theory 3:165–85
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Future Farmers 2017. Seed journey. Future Farmers http://futurefarmers.com/seedjourney/
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Gabrys J. 2016. Program Earth: Environmental Sensing Technology and the Making of a Computational Planet Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Gagné K, Rasmussen MB 2016. Introduction—an amphibious anthropology: the production of place at the confluence of land and water. Anthropologica 58:2135–49
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Geertz C. 1976. Art as a cultural system. MLN 91:61473–99
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Gell A. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory Oxford, UK: Clarendon
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Geobodies 2018. Biography of Ursula Biemann. Geobodies https://www.geobodies.org/biography
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Gillis J. 2013. The blue humanities. Humanities 34:310–13
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Ginsberg AD, Calvert J, Schyfter P, Elfick A, Endy D 2014. Synthetic Aesthetics: Investigating Synthetic Biology's Designs on Nature Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Gómez-Peña G. 2000. Dangerous Border Crossers. The Artist Talks Back New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Goodman A, Heath D, Lindee MS 2003. Genetic Nature/Culture: Anthropology and Science Beyond the Two-Culture Divide Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Graburn NHH 1976. Ethnic and Tourist Arts: Cultural Expressions from the Fourth World Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Haraway DJ. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse™: Feminism and Technoscience New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Haraway D. 2007. Speculative fabulations for technoculture's generations: taking care of unexpected country. (tender) creature exhibition catalogue P Piccinini 4–21 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain: Artium
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Haraway D. 2017. Symbiogenesis, sympoiesis, and art science activisms for staying with the trouble. See Tsing et al. 2017 M24–50
  59. Hayward E. 2005. Enfolded vision: refracting The Love Life of the Octopus. Octopus J. Vis. Stud 1:29–44
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Hayward E. 2016. Wailing bones: Ellen Gallagher, Drexciya, and Freud's Oceanic Keynote Lect. presented at EcoMaterialisms: Scales of Matter(ing), May 13–14, Univ. Calif., Davis
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Heller C, Pezzani L 2014. Liquid Traces—The Left-to-Die Boat Case Video, 17 min, 59s. https://www.forensic-architecture.org/case/left-die-boat/
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Heller C, Pezzani L, Res SITU 2012. The Left-to-Die Boat: the deadly drift of a migrants’ boat in the Central Mediterranean Forensic Archit., Goldsmiths, Univ London: http://www.forensic-architecture.org/case/left-die-boat/
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Helmreich S. 2009. Alien Ocean: Anthropological Voyages in Microbial Seas Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Helmreich S. 2016a. How like a reef: figuring coral, 1839–2010. See Helmreich 2016b 48–61
  65. Helmreich S. 2016b. Sounding the Limits of Life: Essays in the Anthropology of Biology and Beyond Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Helmreich S. 2016c. Underwater music: tuning composition to the sounds of science. See Helmreich 2016b 137–54
  67. Heon LS, Ackerman J 2000. Unnatural Science: An Exhibition, Spring 2000–Spring 2001, MASS MoCA North Adams, MA: MASS MoCA
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Hessler S. 2018. Tidalectics: Imagining an Oceanic Worldview through Art and Science Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Hirsch R. 2005. The strange case of Steve Kurtz: Critical Art Ensemble and the price of freedom. Afterimage 32:622–31
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Holmes DR, Marcus GE 2006. Fast capitalism: para-ethnography and the rise of the symbolic analyst. Frontiers of Capital: Ethnographic Reflections on the New Economy MS Fisher, G Downey 33–56 Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Ingold T. 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Ingold T, Palsson G 2013. Biosocial Becomings: Integrating Social and Biological Anthropology Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Inst. Fig. 2017. Crochet Hyperbolic Coral Reef Project. Institute for Figuring http://www.theiff.org/exhibits/reef.html
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Jones CA 2006. Sensorium: Embodied Experience, Technology, and Contemporary Art Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Jones CA. 2016a. Anicka Yi: Biofiction and the Umwelt. The Hugo Boss Prize 2016: 20 Years R Solomon Guggenheim Found. New York: Guggenheim Mus.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Jones CA. 2016b. The Global Work of Art: World's Fairs, Biennials, and the Aesthetics of Experience Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Jones CA, Galison P 1998. Picturing Science, Producing Art London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Jones CA, Mather D, Uchill R 2016. Experience: Culture, Cognition, and the Common Sense Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Jue M. 2018. Wild Blue Media: Thinking Through Seawater Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press In press
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Kac E 2007. Signs of Life: Bio Art and Beyond Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Kac E, Ronell A 2007. Life Extreme: An Illustrated Guide to New Life Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Kahn J, Ben-Yehoyada N, Dua J 2017. Oceans Panel at Annu. Meet. Am. Anthropol. Assoc., 116th. Washington, DC:
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Kelley L. 2016. Bioart Kitchen: Art, Feminism and Technoscience London: Tauris
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Kim G, Laurence A 2017. ‘All the World Is Here’ exhibition review. History of Anthropology Newsletter Dec. 12. http://histanthro.org/all-the-world-is-here/
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Kirksey SE 2014. The Multispecies Salon Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Kirksey SE, Helmreich S 2010. The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cult. Anthropol. 25:4545–76
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Klingan K, Sepahvand A, Rosol C, Scherer B 2014. Textures of the Anthropocene: Grain Vapor Ray Berlin: Revolver
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Kramer J. 2004. Figurative repatriation: First nations “artist-warriors” recover, reclaim, and return cultural property through self-definition. J. Mater. Cult. 9:2161–82
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Krause F. 2017. Towards an amphibious anthropology of delta life. Hum. Ecol. 45:403–8
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Lambert-Beatty C. 2008. Twelve miles: boundaries of the new art/activism. Signs 33:2309–27
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Lambert-Beatty C. 2009. Make-believe: parafiction and plausibility. October 129:51–84
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Latour B. 2017. Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime Cambridge: Polity
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Latour B, Weibel P 2005. Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Levin T, Frohne UA, Weibel P 2002. Ctrl [space]: Rhetorics of Surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Liboiron M. 2016. Redefining pollution and action: the matter of plastics. J. Mater. Cult. 21:187–110
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Liboiron M. 2017a. Compromised action: the case of BabyLegs. Engag. Sci. Technol. Soc. 3:499–527
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Liboiron M. 2017b. Max Liboiron, assistant professor Curriculum vitae, Dep. Geogr., Mem. Univ. Nfld. St. John's, Can: https://maxliboiron.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/liboiron-cv-sept-2017.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Liboiron M. 2017c. Pollution is colonialism. Discard Studies Sept. 1. https://discardstudies.com/2017/09/01/pollution-is-colonialism/
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Maquet J. 1986. The Aesthetic Experience: An Anthropologist Looks at the Visual Arts New Haven, CT/London: Yale Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Marcus GE, Fischer MMJ 1986. Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Marcus GE, Myers FR 1995. The Traffic in Culture: Refiguring Art and Anthropology Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Marks J. 2013. The nature/culture of genetic facts. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 42:247–67
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Martineau J, Ritskes E 2014. Fugitive Indigeneity: reclaiming the terrain of decolonial struggle through Indigenous art. Decolonization Indig. Educ. Soc. 3:1i–xii
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Mathur A, da Cunha D 2009. SOAK: Mumbai in an Estuary New Delhi: Rupa
     [Google Scholar]
  105. McCurry J. 2015. Fukushima's radioactive wasteland turns into art gallery. Guardian Nov. 15. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/16/fukushimas-radioactive-wasteland-turns-into-art-gallery
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Micchelli T. 2015. Unreliable informants: a Walid Raad primer. Hyperallergic Oct. 10. https://hyperallergic.com/243457/unreliable-informants-a-walid-raad-primer/
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Milbourne K. 2017. African art and the Anthropocene. Living in the Anthropocene: Earth in the Age of Humans WJ Kress, JK Stine 113–16 Washington, DC: Smithson. Inst.
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Mitchell RE. 2010. Bioart and the Vitality of Media Seattle: Univ. Wash. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Monsaingeon B. 2017. Homo detritus: Critique de la Societé du Déchet Paris: Éd. Seuil
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Moore C. 2007. Not just a pretty picture: art as ecological communication. Water Wind Art and Debate: How Environmental Concerns Impact on Disciplinary Research G Birch 345–92 Sydney: Sydney Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Munn ND. 1966. Visual categories: an approach to the study of representational systems. Am. Anthropol. 68:936–50
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Murphy M. 2017. Alterlife and decolonial chemical relations. Cult. Anthropol. 32:4494–503
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Myers FR. 2002. Painting Culture: The Making of Aboriginal High Art Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Myers N. 2017. Ungrid-able ecologies: decolonizing the ecological sensorium in a 10,000 year-old naturalcultural happening. Catalyst Fem. Theory Technosci. 3:2
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Neimanis A. 2012. Hydrofeminism: or, on becoming a body of water. Undutiful Daughters: New Directions in Feminist Thought and Practice H Gunkel, C Cigianni, F Söderbäck 85–99 New York: Palgrave MacMillan
     [Google Scholar]
  116. O'Brien M. 2017. What's science got to do with it. Women Eco Artists Dialog 9: https://directory.weadartists.org/science-art
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Obodo E, Anikpe E 2014. Engaging the mundane: the Art of Jerry Buhari, Kuti Usman, Uche Onyishi and George Osodi on the environmental question. Art Des. Stud. 24:8–14
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Paglen T. 2009. Blank Spots on the Map: The Dark Geography of the Pentagon's Secret World New York: Dutton
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Paravisini-Gebert L. 2019. The debris of Caribbean history: literature, art and archipelagic plastic. In Archipelagic Thinking: Towards New Comparative Methodologies and Disciplinary Formations Y Martínez-San Miguel,, M Stephens New Brunswick: NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press. In press
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Parks L, Starosielski N 2015. Signal Traffic: Critical Studies of Media Infrastructures Urbana: Univ. Ill. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Pauwellussen A. 2017. Amphibious anthropology: engaging with maritime worlds in Indonesia PhD Diss. Anthropol., Wageningen Univ Neth.:
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Pfaffenberger B. 1992. Social anthropology of technology. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 21:491–516
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Price S. 1989. Primitive Art in Civilized Places Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Quigley A, Efford H, Rees K 2015. Making plastic public, penile, and unpleasant: design & final report from P.E.N.I.S. handlers Class Rep., April 24, Dep. Sociol., Meml. Univ. Nfld. https://civiclaboratory.files.wordpress.com/2017/12/rees-et-al-penis-final-report.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  125. Raad W. 2012. I Might Die Before I Get a Rifle Göttingen, Ger.: Steidl
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Rasmussen MB, Orlove B 2017. Anthropologists exploring water in social and cultural life. Am. Anthropol. 120:1 http://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1548-1433/exploring-water.html
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Redfield R, Herskovits M, Ekholm GF 1959. Aspects of Primitive Art New York: Mus. Primit. Art
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Reed TV. 2009. Toxic colonialism, environmental justice, and Native resistance in Silko's Almanac of the Dead. MELUS 34:225–42
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Reid R, Traweek S 2000. Doing Science + Culture New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Remes O, Skelton P 2010. Conspiracy Dwellings: Surveillance in Contemporary Art Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Sch.
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Roosth S. 2013. Biobricks and crocheted coral: dispatches from the life sciences in the age of fabrication. Sci. Context 26:1153–71
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Schneider A, Wright C 2010. Between Art and Anthropology: Contemporary Ethnographic Practice London: Bloomsbury
     [Google Scholar]
  133. Schuppli S. 2015. Slick images: the photogenic politics of oil. Allegory of the Cave Painting M Mirca, VWJ van Gerven Oei 425–47 Antwerp, Belg.: Extra City
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Scott J. 2006. Artists-in-Labs: Processes of Inquiry Vienna: Springer-Verlag
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Shapiro N, Kirksey E 2017. Chemo-ethnography: an introduction. Cult. Anthropol. 32:4481–93
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Shotter J. 2006. Understanding process from within: an argument for “withness”—thinking. Organ. Stud. 27:4585–604
     [Google Scholar]
  137. Siegel G. 2014. Forensic Media: Reconstructing Accidents in Accelerated Modernity Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  138. Snow CP. 1959. The Two Cultures Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  139. Sokol Z. 2015. Photographs of the underwater telecommunication cables tapped by the NSA. Vice Sept. 9. http://www.vice.com/read/the-map-is-the-territory-0000742-v22n9
    [Google Scholar]
  140. Spillers HJ. 1987. Mama's baby, papa's maybe: an American Grammar book. Diacritics 17:264–81
     [Google Scholar]
  141. spurse 2010. OCEA(n). Presented as part of Undercurrents: Experimental Ecosystems in Recent Art exhibition, May 27–June 19 Whitney Mus. Am. Art New York: http://www.spurse.org/what-weve-done/ocean/
  142. Stoller P. 1989. The Taste of Ethnographic Things: The Senses in Anthropology Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  143. Strang V. 2015. Reflecting nature: water beings in history and imagination. Waterworlds: Anthropology in Fluid Environments K Hastrup, F Hastrup 247–78 Oxford, UK: Berghahn Books
     [Google Scholar]
  144. Strathausen C. 2017. Bioaesthetics: Making Sense of Life in Science and the Arts Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  145. Strathern M. 1992. After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  146. Taussig M. 2015. Seeds of time. Flatbread Soc http://www.flatbreadsociety.net/stories/30/seeds-of-time
    [Google Scholar]
  147. ten Bos R. 2009. Towards an amphibious anthropology: water and Peter Sloterdijk. Environ. Plan. D Soc. Space 27:73–86
     [Google Scholar]
  148. Terranova CN, Tromble M 2016. The Routledge Handbook to Biology in Art and Architecture London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  149. Thompson N 2005. Becoming Animal: Contemporary Art in the Animal Kingdom Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
  150. Thompson N, Sholette G 2004. The Interventionists: Users’ Manual for the Creative Disruption of Everyday Life Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
  151. Tsing AL, Swanson HA, Gan E, Bubandt N 2017. Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Ghosts and Monsters of the Anthropocene Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  152. Vaage NS. 2016. What ethics for bioart. Nanoethics 10:87–104
     [Google Scholar]
  153. Wallen R. 2012. Ecological art: a call for visionary intervention in a time of crisis. Leonardo 45:3234–42
     [Google Scholar]
  154. Walters V. 2010. The artist as shaman: the work of Joseph Beuys and Marcus Coates. See Schneider & Wright 2010 35–48
  155. Weintraub L 2012. To Life! Eco Art in Pursuit of a Sustainable Planet Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  156. Weschler L. 1995. Mr. Wilson's Cabinet of Wonder: Pronged Ants, Horned Humans, Mice on Toast, and Other Marvels of Jurassic Technology. New York: Vintage
     [Google Scholar]
  157. Wilson L, Bates T 2015. Threats of life: a review of postbiopolitical art. Anthropol. Now 7:2128–38
     [Google Scholar]
  158. Yoldas P. 2014. An Ecosystem of Excess Berlin: Argobooks
     [Google Scholar]
  159. Zaretsky A. 2001. Posthuman temptation: eros and mutagenesis Presented at Subtle Technol. Conf. May 17–20, Univ. Tor.
    [Google Scholar]
  160. Zettler ER, Mincer TJ, Amaral-Zettler LA 2013. Life in the “plastisphere”: microbial communities on plastic marine debris. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47:137137–46
     [Google Scholar]
  161. Zurr I. 2004. Complicating notions of life: semi living entities. Biomediale: Contemporary Society and Genomic Culture D Bulatov 402–11 Kaliningrad, Russ.: Natl. Cent. Contemp. Arts
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050147
Loading
Science/Art/Culture Through an Oceanic Lens
Annual Review of Anthropology 47, 97 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050147
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050147
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050147
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error