1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Anthropology
  4. Volume 47, 2018
  5. Article

Annual Review of Anthropology

Volume 47, 2018

Interspecies Relations and Agrarian Worlds

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed burgeoning interest in interspecies relations and multispecies ethnography. This review explores what such perspectives bring to long-standing anthropological attention to agrarian worlds. Considering why so much recent scholarship only minimally engages with longer disciplinary traditions found within ecological and environmental anthropology and ethnobotany, the review examines continuities and discontinuities across these different modes of attending to interspecies relationships. From here, it explores how contemporary scholarship renews anthropological attention to questions of domestication, relatedness, agency, and personhood and how it charts new ground by engaging theories of biopolitics, biocapital, biosemiotics, and plant ontologies. While noting that recent work has distinctive theoretical preoccupations, the review concludes by suggesting that fruitful possibilities lie in working with, and across, established and emergent anthropologies of the agrarian.

Keyword(s): biopower, domestication, environmental anthropology, human–animal relations, human–plant relations, multispecies ethnography
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050232
2018-10-21
2024-12-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/anthro/47/1/annurev-anthro-102317-050232.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050232&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Agamben G. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life transl. D Heller-Roazen Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Agamben G. 2004. The Open: Man and Animal Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Agrawal A, Sivaramakrishnan K 2000. Agrarian Environments: Resources, Representations, and Rule in India Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Barth F. 1956. Ecologic relationships of ethnic groups in Swat, North Pakistan. Am. Anthropol. 58:61079–89
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bateson G. 1979. Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity New York: Dutton, 1st ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bateson G. 2000. Steps to an Ecology of Mind Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Beldo L. 2017. Metabolic labor: broiler chickens and the exploitation of vitality. Environ. Humanit. 9:1108–28
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bennett J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bertoni F. 2013. Soil and worm: on eating as relating. Sci. Cult. 22:161–85
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Besky S. 2014. The Darjeeling Distinction: Labor and Justice on Fair-Trade Tea Plantations in India Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Besky S, Blanchette A 2019. How Nature Works Santa Fe, NM/Albuquerque, NM: SAR Press/Univ. N. M. Press. , In press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Besky S, Padwe J 2016. Placing plants in territory. Environ. Soc. Adv. Res. 7:9–28
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bessire L, Bond D 2014. Ontological anthropology and the deferral of critique. Am. Ethnol. 41:3440–56
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Blanchette A. 2015. Herding species: biosecurity, posthuman labor, and the American industrial pig. Cult. Anthropol. 30:4640–69
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Blanchette A. 2018. Industrial meat production. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 47:185–99
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Blomley N. 2007. Making private property: enclosure, common right and the work of hedges. Rural Hist 18:11–21
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Boyd B. 2017. Archaeology and human–animal relations: thinking through anthropocentrism. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 46:299–316
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Braverman I. 2008. “The tree is the enemy soldier”: a sociolegal making of war landscapes in the occupied West Bank. Law Soc. Rev. 42:3449–82
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Braverman I. 2009. Planted Flags: Trees, Land, and Law in Israel/Palestine New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Callon M. 1999. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fisherman of St. Brieuc Bay. The Science Studies Reader M Biagioli 67–94 New York/London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Callon M, Méadel C, Rabeharisoa V 2002. The economy of qualities. Econ. Soc. 31:2194–217
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Calvão F. 2016. Unfree labor. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 45:451–67
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Carney JA. 2001. Black Rice: The African Origins of Rice Cultivation in the Americas Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Cassidy R. 2007. Introduction: domestication reconsidered. See Cassidy & Mullin 2007 1–25
  25. Cassidy R, Mullin M 2007. Where the Wild Things Are Now: Domestication Reconsidered Oxford, New York: Berg
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Choy TK, Faier L, Hathaway MJ, Inoue M, Satsuka S, Tsing A 2009. A new form of collaboration in cultural anthropology: Matsutake worlds. Am. Ethnol. 36:2380–403
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Comaroff J, Comaroff JL 2005. Naturing the nation: aliens, apocalypse, and the postcolonial state. Sovereign Bodies: Citizens, Migrants, and States in the Postcolonial World TB Hansen, F Stepputat 120–47 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Conklin HC. 1954. An ethnoecological approach to shifting agriculture. Trans. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 17:2133–42
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Conklin HC. 1957. Hanunóo Agriculture: A Report on an Integral System of Shifting Cultivation in the Philippines Food Agric. Organ. (FAO) For. Dev. Pap. 12 Northford, CT: Elliott's Books
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Conklin HC. 2007 (1954). The relation of Hanunóo culture to the plant world. See Kuipers & McDermott 2007 196–249
  31. Cronon W. 1991. Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West New York: Norton
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Daly L, French K, Miller TL, Eoin LN 2016. Integrating ontology into ethnobotanical research. J. Ethnobiol. 36:11–9
     [Google Scholar]
  33. de la Cadena M 2014. Runa: human but not only. HAU: J. Ethnogr. Theory 4:2253–59
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Deleuze G, Guattari F 1988. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia transl. B Massumi London: Athlone
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Descola P. 2013. Beyond Nature and Culture transl. J Lloyd Chicago/London: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Despret V, Meuret M 2016. Cosmoecological sheep and the arts of living on a damaged planet. Environ. Humanit. 8:124–36
     [Google Scholar]
  37. DiNovelli-Lang D. 2013. The return of the animal: posthumanism, indigeneity, and anthropology. Environ. Soc. 4:137–56
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Dove MR. 1986. The practical reason of weeds in Indonesia: peasant vs state views of Imperata and Chromolaena. Hum. Ecol. 14:2163–90
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Dove MR. 2000. The life-cycle of indigenous knowledge, and the case of natural rubber production. Indigenous Environmental Knowledge and Its Transformations: Critical Anthropological Perspectives R Ellen, P Parkes, A Bicker 213–51 Amsterdam: Harwood Acad.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Dove MR. 2007. Commentary: kinds of fields. See Kuipers & McDermott 2007 411–27
  41. Dove MR. 2011. The Banana Tree at the Gate: A History of Marginal Peoples and Global Markets in Borneo New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Dove MR, Carpenter C 2008. Environmental Anthropology: A Historical Reader Malden, MA: Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Dunn E. 2007. Escherichia coli, corporate discipline and the failure of the sewer state. Space Polity 11:135–53
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Engels F. 1902 (1884). The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State transl. E Untermann Chicago: Kerr
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Evans-Pritchard EE. 1940. The Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Nilotic People Oxford, UK: Clarendon
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Faier L, Rofel L 2014. Ethnographies of encounter. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 43:363–77
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Fairhead J, Leach M 1996. Misreading the African Landscape: Society and Ecology in a Forest-Savanna Mosaic Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Fearnley L. 2015. Wild goose chase: the displacement of influenza research in the fields of Poyang Lake, China. Cult. Anthropol. 30:112–35
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Frake CO. 1962. Cultural ecology and ethnography. Am. Anthropol. 64:153–59
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Franklin S. 2007. Dolly Mixtures: The Remaking of Genealogy Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Frazer JG. 1887. Totemism Edinburgh: Black
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Fuentes A, Kohn E 2012. Two proposals. Camb. J. Anthropol. 30:2136–46
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Garcia M. 2001. A World of Its Own: Race, Labor, and Citrus in the Making of Greater Los Angeles, 1900–1970 Chapel Hill: Univ. N.C. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Gold AG. 2003. Foreign trees: lives and landscapes in Rajasthan. Nature in the Global South: Environmental Projects in South and Southeast Asia P Greenough, AL Tsing 170–96 Durham/London: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Goody J. 1993. The Culture of Flowers Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Govindrajan R. 2015. “The goat that died for family”: animal sacrifice and interspecies kinship in India's Central Himalayas. Am. Ethnol. 42:3504–19
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Govindrajan R. 2018. Animal Intimacies: Interspecies Relatedness in India's Central Himalayas Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Graeber D. 2015. Radical alterity is just another way of saying “reality”: a reply to Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. HAU: J. Ethnogr. Theory 5:21–41
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Graef DJ. 2016. Wildness. Cult. Anthropol. Sept. 30. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/965-wildness
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Hall M. 2011. Plants as Persons: A Philosophical Botany Albany: State Univ. N.Y. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Haraway D, Ishikawa N, Gilbert SF, Olwig K, Tsing AL, Bubandt N 2016. Anthropologists are talking—about the Anthropocene. Ethnos 81:3535–64
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Haraway DJ. 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science New York/London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Haraway DJ. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Haraway DJ. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness Chicago: Prickly Paradigm
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Haraway DJ. 2008. When Species Meet Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Harris M. 1966. The cultural ecology of India's sacred cattle. Curr. Anthropol. 7:51–66
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Harris M. 1973. Cows, Pigs, Wars, and Witches: The Riddles of Culture New York: Vintage Books
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Hartigan J Jr. 2017. Care of the Species: Races of Corn and the Science of Plant Biodiversity Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Hébert K. 2010. In pursuit of singular salmon: paradoxes of sustainability and the quality commodity. Sci. Cult. 19:4553–81
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Helmreich S. 2008. Species of biocapital. Sci. Cult. 17:4463–78
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Hetherington K. 2013. Beans before the law: knowledge practices, responsibility, and the Paraguayan soy boom. Cult. Anthropol. 28:165–85
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Hetherington K. 2014. Regular soybeans: translation and framing in the ontological politics of a coup. Indiana J. Glob. Leg. Stud. 21:155–78
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Hoffmeyer J. 2008. Biosemiotics: An Examination into the Signs of Life and the Life of Signs transl. J Hoffmeyer, D Favareau Scranton, PA/London: Univ. Scranton Press
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Holbraad M, Pedersen MA 2017. The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Hunn E. 2007. Commentary: Conklin's ethnobiological contribution. See Kuipers & McDermott 2007 191–95
  76. Hustak C, Myers N 2012. Involutionary momentum: affective ecologies and the sciences of plant/insect encounters. Differences 23:374–118
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Ives S. 2014. Farming the South African “bush”: ecologies of belonging and exclusion in rooibos tea. Am. Ethnol. 41:698–713
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Ives SF. 2017. Steeped in Heritage: The Racial Politics of South African Rooibos Tea Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Kirksey SE, Helmreich S 2010. The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cult. Anthropol. 25:4545–76
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Koenig D. 2016. The year 2015 in sociocultural anthropology: material life and emergent cultures. Am. Anthropol. 118:2346–58
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Kohn E. 2007. How dogs dream: Amazonian natures and the politics of transspecies engagement. Am. Ethnol. 34:13–24
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Kohn E. 2013. How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Kuipers J, McDermott R 2007. Fine Description: Ethnographic and Linguistic Essays by Harold C. Conklin. New Haven, CT: Yale Southeast Asian Stud.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Latour B. 1988. The Pasteurization of France Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Latour B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory Oxford, UK/New York: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Latour B. 2014. Anthropology at the time of the Anthropocene—a personal view of what is to be studied Distinguished lecture delivered at the American Anthropological Association Annual Meeting Washington, DC: Dec. http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/139-AAA-Washington.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Leach HM. 2007. Selection and the unforeseen consequences of domestication. See Cassidy & Mullin 2007 71–99
  88. Lévi-Strauss C. 1966. The Savage Mind Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Lévi-Strauss C. 1969 (1962). Totemism Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Lien ME. 2015. Becoming Salmon: Aquaculture and the Domestication of a Fish Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Lorimer J, Driessen C 2013. Bovine biopolitics and the promise of monsters in the rewilding of Heck cattle. Geoforum 48:249–59
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Lowe C. 2010. Viral clouds: becoming H5n1 in Indonesia. Cult. Anthropol. 25:4625–49
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Mansfield B. 2004. Organic views of nature: the debate over organic certification for aquatic animals. Sociol. Rural. 44:2216–32
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Martin RJ, Trigger D 2015. Negotiating belonging: plants, people, and indigeneity in northern Australia. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 21:2276–95
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Mauss M. 2007 (1967). Manual of Ethnography New York/Oxford, UK: Durkheim Press/Berghahn Books
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Mauss M, Beuchat H 1979 (1950). Seasonal Variations of the Eskimo: A Study in Social Morphology London/Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul
     [Google Scholar]
  97. McCann JC. 2005. Maize and Grace: Africa's Encounter with a New World Crop, 1500–2000 Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  98. McElwee PD. 2007. Of rice, mammals, and men: the politics of “wild” and “domesticated” species in Vietnam. See Cassidy & Mullin 2007 249–76
  99. Mintz SW. 1985. Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History New York: Viking
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Morgan LH. 1868. The American Beaver and His Works Philadelphia: Lippincott
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Mullin MH. 1999. Mirrors and windows: sociocultural studies of human-animal relationships. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 28:201–24
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Myers N. 2015. Conversations on plant sensing: notes from the field. NatureCulture 3:35–66
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Myers N. 2017. From the anthropocene to the planthroposcene: designing gardens for plant/people involution. Hist. Anthropol. 28:3297–301
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Nazarea VD. 1999. Lenses and latitudes in landscapes and lifescapes. Ethnoecology: Situated Knowledge/Located Lives VD Nazarea 91–106 Tucson: Univ. Ariz. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Nazarea VD. 2006. Local knowledge and memory in biodiversity conservation. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 35:317–35
     [Google Scholar]
  106. O'Connor TP. 1997. Working at relationships: another look at animal domestication. Antiquity 71:271149–56
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Ogden LA, Hall B, Tanita K 2013. Animals, plants, people, and things: a review of multispecies ethnography. Environ. Soc. Adv. Res. 4:15–24
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Ohnuki-Tierney E. 1993. Rice as Self: Japanese Identities through Time Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Orlove BS. 1980. Ecological anthropology. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 9:235–73
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Orr Y, Lansing JS, Dove MR 2015. Environmental anthropology: systemic perspectives. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 44:153–68
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Osterhoudt S. 2016. Written with seed: the political ecology of memory in Madagascar. J. Political Ecol. 23:1263–78
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Osterhoudt SR. 2017. Vanilla Landscapes: Meaning, Memory and the Cultivation of Place in Madagascar New York: N.Y. Bot. Garden Press
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Pachirat T. 2011. Every Twelve Seconds: Industrialized Slaughter and the Politics of Sight New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Pandian A. 2008. Pastoral power in the postcolony: on the biopolitics of the criminal animal in South India. Cult. Anthropol. 23:185–117
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Pandian A. 2009. Crooked Stalks: Cultivating Virtue in South India Durham, NC/London: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Paxson H. 2008. Post‐Pasteurian Cultures: the microbiopolitics of raw‐milk cheese in the United States. Cult. Anthropol. 23:115–47
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Paxson H. 2013. The Life of Cheese: Crafting Food and Value in America, California Studies in Food and Culture Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Porter N. 2013. Bird flu biopower: strategies for multispecies coexistence in Vit Nam. Am. Ethnol. 40:1132–48
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Posey DA. 2002. Kayapó Ethnoecology and Culture New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Raffles H. 2002. In Amazonia: A Natural History Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Rappaport RA. 1967a. Pigs for the Ancestors: Ritual in the Ecology of a New Guinea People New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 2nd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Rappaport RA. 1967b. Ritual regulation of environmental relations among a New Guinea people. Ethnology 6:117–30
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Robbins P. 2001. Tracking invasive land covers in India, or why our landscapes have never been modern. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 91:4637–59
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Rose DB. 2013. Val Plumwood's philosophical animism: attentive interactions in the sentient world. Environ. Humanit. 3:193–109
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Russell N. 2007. The domestication of anthropology. See Cassidy & Mullin 2007 27–48
  126. Sahlins M. 1976. Culture and Practical Reason Chicago/London: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Scott JC. 2009. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Scott JC. 2017. Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Seshia Galvin S. 2014. Organic designs and agrarian practice in Uttarakhand, India. Cult. Agric. Food Environ. 36:2118–28
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Sheridan M. 2016. Boundary plants, the social production of space, and vegetative agency in agrarian societies. Environ. Soc. Adv. Res. 7:29–49
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Sivaramakrishnan K. 1999. Modern Forests: Statemaking and Environmental Change in Colonial Eastern India Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Stengers I. 2010. Cosmopolitics Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press. 2 vols.
     [Google Scholar]
  133. Strathern M. 1980. No nature, no culture: the Hagen case. Nature, Culture, and Gender CP MacCormack, M Strathern 174–222 Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Strathern M. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Strathern M. 1991. Partial Connections Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Strathern M. 1999. Property, Substance, and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things London: Athlone
     [Google Scholar]
  137. Trewavas A. 2002. Mindless mastery. Nature 415:841
     [Google Scholar]
  138. Tsing A. 2012. Unruly edges: mushrooms as companion species. Environ. Humanit. 1:141–54
     [Google Scholar]
  139. Tsing AL. 1993. In the Realm of the Diamond Queen: Marginality in an Out-of-the-Way Place Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  140. Tsing AL. 2005. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  141. Tsing AL. 2014. Strathern beyond the human: testimony of a spore. Theory Cult. Soc. 31:2/3221–41
     [Google Scholar]
  142. Tsing AL. 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  143. Tylor EB. 1871. Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom London: J. Murray. 2 vols.
     [Google Scholar]
  144. Viveiros de Castro E 1998. Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 4:469–88
     [Google Scholar]
  145. Viveiros de Castro E 2015. Who is afraid of the ontological wolf? Some comments on an ongoing anthropological debate. Camb. J. Anthropol. 33:12–17
     [Google Scholar]
  146. West P. 2012. From Modern Production to Imagined Primitive: The Social World of Coffee from Papua New Guinea Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  147. Wolfe C. 2012. Before the Law: Humans and Other Animals in a Biopolitical Frame Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050232
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error