AlphaFold and Protein Folding: Not Dead Yet! The Frontier Is Conformational Ensembles

Literature Cited

1. 1.

   Dill KA, MacCallum JL. 2012.. The protein-folding problem, 50 years on. . Science 338::1042–46
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
2. 2.

   Henzler-Wildman K, Kern D. 2007.. Dynamic personalities of proteins. . Nature 450::964–72
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
3. 3.

   Knoverek CR, Amarasinghe GK, Bowman GR. 2019.. Advanced methods for accessing protein shape-shifting present new therapeutic opportunities. . Trends Biochem. Sci. 44::351–64
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
4. 4.

   Kuzmanic A, Bowman GR, Juarez-Jimenez J, Michel J, Gervasio FL. 2020.. Investigating cryptic binding sites by molecular dynamics simulations. . Acc. Chem. Res. 53::654–61
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
5. 5.

   Meller A, Ward M, Borowsky J, Kshirsagar M, Lotthammer JM, et al. 2023.. Predicting locations of cryptic pockets from single protein structures using the PocketMiner graph neural network. . Nat. Commun. 14::1177
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
6. 6.

   Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, et al. 2021.. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. . Nature 596::583–89
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
7. 7.

   Burley SK, Berman HM, Duarte JM, Feng Z, Flatt JW, et al. 2022.. Protein Data Bank: a comprehensive review of 3D structure holdings and worldwide utilization by researchers, educators, and students. . Biomolecules 12::1425
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
8. 8.

   Millan C, Keegan RM, Pereira J, Sammito MD, Simpkin AJ, et al. 2021.. Assessing the utility of CASP14 models for molecular replacement. . Proteins 89::1752–69
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
9. 9.

   Lane TJ. 2023.. Protein structure prediction has reached the single-structure frontier. . Nat. Methods 20::170–73
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
10. 10.

    Barbarin-Bocahu I, Graille M. 2022.. The X-ray crystallography phase problem solved thanks to AlphaFold and RoseTTAFold models: a case-study report. . Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 78::517–31
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
11. 11.

    McCoy AJ, Sammito MD, Read RJ. 2022.. Implications of AlphaFold2 for crystallographic phasing by molecular replacement. . Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 78::1–13
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
12. 12.

    Oliver MR, Toon K, Lewis CB, Devlin S, Gifford RJ, Grove J. 2023.. Structures of the Hepaci-, Pegi-, and Pestiviruses envelope proteins suggest a novel membrane fusion mechanism. . PLOS Biol. 21::e3002174
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
13. 13.

    Meller A, De Oliveira S, Davtyan A, Abramyan T, Bowman GR, van den Bedem H. 2023.. Discovery of a cryptic pocket in the AI-predicted structure of PPM1D phosphatase explains the binding site and potency of its allosteric inhibitors. . Front. Mol. Biosci. 10::1171143
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
14. 14.

    Ren F, Ding X, Zheng M, Korzinkin M, Cai X, et al. 2023.. AlphaFold accelerates artificial intelligence powered drug discovery: efficient discovery of a novel CDK20 small molecule inhibitor. . Chem. Sci. 14::1443–52
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
15. 15.

    Varadi M, Anyango S, Deshpande M, Nair S, Natassia C, et al. 2022.. AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. . Nucleic Acids Res. 50::D439–44
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
16. 16.

    Bouatta N, AlQuraishi M. 2023.. Structural biology at the scale of proteomes. . Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 30::129–30
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
17. 17.

    Bayly-Jones C, Whisstock JC. 2022.. Mining folded proteomes in the era of accurate structure prediction. . PLOS Comput. Biol. 18::e1009930
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
18. 18.

    Evans R, O'Neill M, Pritzel A, Antropova N, Senior A, et al. 2021.. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. . bioRxiv 2021.10.04.463034. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.04.463034
19. 19.

    Hekkelman ML, de Vries I, Joosten RP, Perrakis A. 2023.. AlphaFill: enriching AlphaFold models with ligands and cofactors. . Nat. Methods 20::205–13
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
20. 20.

    Ahdritz G, Bouatta N, Kadyan S, Xia Q, Gerecke W, et al. 2022.. OpenFold: Retraining AlphaFold2 yields new insights into its learning mechanisms and capacity for generalization. . bioRxiv 2022.11.20.517210. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.20.517210
21. 21.

    Baek M, DiMaio F, Anishchenko I, Dauparas J, Ovchinnikov S, et al. 2021.. Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network. . Science 373::871–76
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
22. 22.

    Chakravarty D, Porter LL. 2022.. AlphaFold2 fails to predict protein fold switching. . Protein Sci. 31::e4353
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
23. 23.

    Cheng J, Novati G, Pan J, Bycroft C, Zemgulyte A, et al. 2023.. Accurate proteome-wide missense variant effect prediction with AlphaMissense. . Science 381::eadg7492
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
24. 24.

    Karelina M, Noh JJ, Dror RO. 2023.. How accurately can one predict drug binding modes using AlphaFold models?. eLife 12::RP89386
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
25. 25.

    Ruff KM, Pappu RV. 2021.. AlphaFold and implications for intrinsically disordered proteins. . J. Mol. Biol. 433::167208
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
26. 26.

    Meller A, Lotthammer JM, Smith LG, Novak B, Lee LA, et al. 2023.. Drug specificity and affinity are encoded in the probability of cryptic pocket opening in myosin motor domains. . eLife 12::e83602
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
27. 27.

    Porter JR, Meller A, Zimmerman MI, Greenberg MJ, Bowman GR. 2020.. Conformational distributions of isolated myosin motor domains encode their mechanochemical properties. . eLife 9::e55132
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
28. 28.

    Hart KM, Moeder KE, Ho CMW, Zimmerman MI, Frederick TE, Bowman GR. 2017.. Designing small molecules to target cryptic pockets yields both positive and negative allosteric modulators. . PLOS ONE 12::e0178678
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
29. 29.

    Smith LG, Novak B, Osato M, Mobley DL, Bowman GR. 2023.. PopShift: a thermodynamically sound approach to estimate binding free energies by accounting for ligand-induced population shifts from a ligand-free Markov state model. . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 20::1036–50
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
30. 30.

    Fischer M, Coleman RG, Fraser JS, Shoichet BK. 2014.. Incorporation of protein flexibility and conformational energy penalties in docking screens to improve ligand discovery. . Nat. Chem. 6::575–83
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
31. 31.

    Del Alamo D, Sala D, Mchaourab HS, Meiler J. 2022.. Sampling alternative conformational states of transporters and receptors with AlphaFold2. . eLife 11::e75751
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
32. 32.

    Meller A, Bhakat S, Solieva S, Bowman GR. 2023.. Accelerating cryptic pocket discovery using AlphaFold. . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19::4355–63
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
33. 33.

    Vani BP, Aranganathan A, Tiwary P. 2023.. Exploring kinase DFG loop conformational stability with AlphaFold2-RAVE. . arXiv:2309.03649 [physics.bio-ph]
34. 34.

    Mansoor S, Baek M, Park H, Lee GR, Baker D. 2023.. Protein ensemble generation through variational autoencoder latent space sampling. . bioRxiv 2023.08.01.551540. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.01.551540
35. 35.

    Vani BP, Aranganathan A, Wang D, Tiwary P. 2023.. AlphaFold2-RAVE: from sequence to Boltzmann ranking. . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19::4351–54
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
36. 36.

    Voelz VA, Pande VS, Bowman GR. 2023.. Folding@home: achievements from over 20 years of citizen science herald the exascale era. . Biophys. J. 122::2852–63
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
37. 37.

    Zimmerman M, Porter J, Ward M, Singh S, Vithani N, et al. 2021.. SARS-CoV-2 simulations go exascale to predict dramatic spike opening and cryptic pockets across the proteome. . Nat. Chem. 13::651–59
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
38. 38.

    Noé F, Olsson S, Köhler J, Wu H. 2019.. Boltzmann generators: sampling equilibrium states of many-body systems with deep learning. . Science 365::eaaw1147
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
39. 39.

    Mehdi S, Smith Z, Herron L, Zou Z, Tiwary P. 2023.. Enhanced sampling with machine learning: a review. . arXiv:2306.09111 [cond-mat.stat-mech]
40. 40.

    Jones MS, McDargh ZA, Wiewiora RP, Izaguirre JA, Xu H, Ferguson AL. 2023.. Molecular latent space simulators for distributed and multimolecular trajectories. . J. Phys. Chem. A 127::5470–90
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]