When We Publish: Accuracy and Quality Control in the Time of Open Access

Literature Cited

1. Abbott A. 2023. Strife at eLife: inside a journal's quest to upend science publishing. Nature 615:780–81
   [Google Scholar]
2. Allot A, Lee K, Chen Q, Luo L, Lu Z. 2021. LitSuggest: a web-based system for literature recommendation and curation using machine learning. Nucleic Acids Res 49:W352–58
   [Google Scholar]
3. Beall J. 2012. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature 489:7415179
   [Google Scholar]
4. Carneiro CFD, Costa G, Neves K, Abreu MB, Tan PB et al. 2022. Mapping the content of comments on bioRxiv and medRxiv preprints. bioRxiv 2022.11.23.517621. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.23.517621
5. Hill R, Hettrick S, Moher D. 2023. What can open research values bring to research assessment reform?. DORA Blog July 7. https://sfdora.org/2023/07/07/what-can-open-research-values-bring-to-research-assessment-reform/
   [Google Scholar]
6. Jergas H, Baethge C. 2015. Quotation accuracy in medical journal articles—a systematic review and meta-analysis. PeerJ 3:e1364
   [Google Scholar]
7. Kießling T. 2019. A decade of transparent peer review. Press release, Sept. 16, EMBO. https://www.embo.org/features/a-decade-of-transparent-peer-review/#::text=When%20The%20EMBO%20Journal%20introduced,comments%20alongside%20its%20research%20articles
8. Larivière V, Kiermer V, MacCallum CJ, McNutt M, Patterson M et al. 2016. A simple proposal for the publication of journal citation distributions. bioRxiv 062109. https://doi.org/10.1101/062109
9. Müller HM, Van Auken KM, Li Y, Sternberg PW. 2018. Textpresso Central: a customizable platform for searching, text mining, viewing, and curating biomedical literature. BMC Bioinform. 19:194
   [Google Scholar]
10. Nissen SB, Magidson T, Gross K, Bergstrom CT. 2016. Publication bias and the canonization of false facts. eLife 5:e21451
    [Google Scholar]
11. Spier R. 2002. The history of the peer-review process. Trends Biotechnol. 20:8357–58
    [Google Scholar]
12. West JD, Bergstrom CT. 2021. Misinformation in and about science. PNAS 118:15e1912444117
    [Google Scholar]