1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology
  4. Volume 35, 2019
  5. Article

Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology

Volume 35, 2019

Light-Sheet Microscopy and Its Potential for Understanding Developmental Processes

Abstract

The ability to visualize and quantitatively measure dynamic biological processes in vivo and at high spatiotemporal resolution is of fundamental importance to experimental investigations in developmental biology. Light-sheet microscopy is particularly well suited to providing such data, since it offers exceptionally high imaging speed and good spatial resolution while minimizing light-induced damage to the specimen. We review core principles and recent advances in light-sheet microscopy, with a focus on concepts and implementations relevant for applications in developmental biology. We discuss how light-sheet microcopy has helped advance our understanding of developmental processes from single-molecule to whole-organism studies, assess the potential for synergies with other state-of-the-art technologies, and introduce methods for computational image and data analysis. Finally, we explore the future trajectory of light-sheet microscopy, discuss key efforts to disseminate new light-sheet technology, and identify exciting opportunities for further advances.

Keyword(s): cellular dynamics, embryonic development, fluorescence microscopy, image processing, light-sheet microscopy, live imaging
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100818-125311
2019-10-06
2025-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cellbio/35/1/annurev-cellbio-100818-125311.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100818-125311&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Aguet F, Upadhyayula S, Gaudin R, Chou YY, Cocucci E et al. 2016. Membrane dynamics of dividing cells imaged by lattice light-sheet microscopy. Mol. Biol. Cell 27:3418–35
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Amat F, Hockendorf B, Wan Y, Lemon WC, McDole K, Keller PJ 2015. Efficient processing and analysis of large-scale light-sheet microscopy data. Nat. Protoc. 10:1679–96
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Amat F, Lemon W, Mossing DP, McDole K, Wan Y et al. 2014. Fast, accurate reconstruction of cell lineages from large-scale fluorescence microscopy data. Nat. Methods 11:951–58
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Andilla J, Jorand R, Olarte OE, Dufour AC, Cazales M et al. 2017. Imaging tissue-mimic with light sheet microscopy: a comparative guideline. Sci. Rep. 7:44939
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Auldridge ME, Satyshur KA, Anstrom DM, Forest KT 2012. Structure-guided engineering enhances a phytochrome-based infrared fluorescent protein. J. Biol. Chem. 287:7000–9
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Balazs B, Deschamps J, Albert M, Ries J, Hufnagel L 2017. A real-time compression library for microscopy images. bioRxiv 164624 . https://doi.org/10.1101/164624
    [Crossref]
  7. Baumgart E, Kubitscheck U. 2012. Scanned light sheet microscopy with confocal slit detection. Opt. Express 20:21805–14
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Behrndt M, Salbreux G, Campinho P, Hauschild R, Oswald F et al. 2012. Forces driving epithelial spreading in zebrafish gastrulation. Science 338:257–60
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Berthet B, Maizel A. 2016. Light sheet microscopy and live imaging of plants. J. Microsc. 263:158–64
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Breuninger T, Greger K, Stelzer EH 2007. Lateral modulation boosts image quality in single plane illumination fluorescence microscopy. Opt. Lett. 32:1938–40
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bria A, Iannello G, Onofri L, Peng H 2016. TeraFly: real-time three-dimensional visualization and annotation of terabytes of multidimensional volumetric images. Nat. Methods 13:192–94
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bulina ME, Chudakov DM, Britanova OV, Yanushevich YG, Staroverov DB et al. 2006. A genetically encoded photosensitizer. Nat. Biotechnol. 24:95–99
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Campinho P, Behrndt M, Ranft J, Risler T, Minc N, Heisenberg CP 2013. Tension-oriented cell divisions limit anisotropic tissue tension in epithelial spreading during zebrafish epiboly. Nat. Cell Biol. 15:1405–14
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Carpenter AE, Jones TR, Lamprecht MR, Clarke C, Kang IH et al. 2006. CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol 7:R100
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Casari A, Schiavone M, Facchinello N, Vettori A, Meyer D et al. 2014. A Smad3 transgenic reporter reveals TGF-beta control of zebrafish spinal cord development. Dev. Biol. 396:81–93
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Cheeseman BL, Gunther U, Gonciarz K, Susik M, Sbalzarini IF 2018. Adaptive particle representation of fluorescence microscopy images. Nat. Commun. 9:5160
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen B, Gilbert LA, Cimini BA, Schnitzbauer J, Zhang W et al. 2013. Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system. Cell 155:1479–91
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen BC, Legant WR, Wang K, Shao L, Milkie DE et al. 2014. Lattice light-sheet microscopy: imaging molecules to embryos at high spatiotemporal resolution. Science 346:1257998
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen F, Tillberg PW, Boyden ES 2015. Expansion microscopy. Science 347:543–48
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen KH, Boettiger AN, Moffitt JR, Wang S, Zhuang X 2015. Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells. Science 348:aaa6090
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Chhetri RK, Amat F, Wan Y, Hockendorf B, Lemon WC, Keller PJ 2015. Whole-animal functional and developmental imaging with isotropic spatial resolution. Nat. Methods 12:1171–78
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Collery RF, Link BA. 2011. Dynamic smad-mediated BMP signaling revealed through transgenic zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 240:712–22
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Costantini LM, Baloban M, Markwardt ML, Rizzo M, Guo F et al. 2015. A palette of fluorescent proteins optimized for diverse cellular environments. Nat. Commun. 6:7670
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Cranfill PJ, Sell BR, Baird MA, Allen JR, Lavagnino Z et al. 2016. Quantitative assessment of fluorescent proteins. Nat. Methods 13:557–62
     [Google Scholar]
  25. de Chaumont F, Dallongeville S, Chenouard N, Hervé N, Pop S et al. 2012. Icy: an open bioimage informatics platform for extended reproducible research. Nat. Methods 9:690–96
     [Google Scholar]
  26. de Medeiros G, Balazs B, Hufnagel L 2016. Light-sheet imaging of mammalian development. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 55:148–55
     [Google Scholar]
  27. de Medeiros G, Norlin N, Gunther S, Albert M, Panavaite L et al. 2015. Confocal multiview light-sheet microscopy. Nat. Commun. 6:8881
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Dean KM, Palmer AE. 2014. Advances in fluorescence labeling strategies for dynamic cellular imaging. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10:512–23
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Fahrbach F, Rohrbach A. 2012. Propagation stability of self-reconstructing Bessel beams enables contrast-enhanced imaging in thick media. Nat. Commun. 3:632
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Fahrbach FO, Simon P, Rohrbach A 2010. Microscopy with self-reconstructing beams. Nat. Photonics 4:780–85
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Farrell JA, Wang Y, Riesenfeld SJ, Shekhar K, Regev A, Schier AF 2018. Single-cell reconstruction of developmental trajectories during zebrafish embryogenesis. Science 360:eaar3131
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Fernandez R, Das P, Mirabet V, Moscardi E, Traas J et al. 2010. Imaging plant growth in 4D: robust tissue reconstruction and lineaging at cell resolution. Nat. Methods 7:547–53
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Filonov GS, Piatkevich KD, Ting LM, Zhang J, Kim K, Verkhusha VV 2011. Bright and stable near-infrared fluorescent protein for in vivo imaging. Nat. Biotechnol. 29:757–61
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Frieda KL, Linton JM, Hormoz S, Choi J, Chow KK et al. 2017. Synthetic recording and in situ readout of lineage information in single cells. Nature 541:107–11
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Fu Q, Martin BL, Matus DQ, Gao L 2016. Imaging multicellular specimens with real-time optimized tiling light-sheet selective plane illumination microscopy. Nat. Commun. 7:11088
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Gomez-Gaviro MV, Balaban E, Bocancea D, Lorrio MT, Pompeiano M et al. 2017. Optimized CUBIC protocol for three-dimensional imaging of chicken embryos at single-cell resolution. Development 144:2092–97
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Grimm JB, Brown TA, English BP, Lionnet T, Lavis LD 2017a. Synthesis of Janelia fluor HaloTag and SNAP-tag ligands and their use in cellular imaging experiments. Methods Mol. Biol. 1663:179–88
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Grimm JB, Muthusamy AK, Liang Y, Brown TA, Lemon WC et al. 2017b. A general method to fine-tune fluorophores for live-cell and in vivo imaging. Nat. Methods 14:987–94
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Gross P, Kumar KV, Grill SW 2017. How active mechanics and regulatory biochemistry combine to form patterns in development. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 46:337–56
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Gualda EJ, Simao D, Pinto C, Alves PM, Brito C 2014. Imaging of human differentiated 3D neural aggregates using light sheet fluorescence microscopy. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 8:221
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Guignard L, Godin C, Fiuza UM, Hufnagel L, Lemaire P, Malandain G 2014. Spatio-temporal registration of embryo images. Proceedings of the IEEE 11th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging778–81 Piscataway, NJ: IEEE
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Gustavsson AK, Petrov PN, Lee MY, Shechtman Y, Moerner WE 2018. 3D single-molecule super-resolution microscopy with a tilted light sheet. Nat. Commun. 9:123
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Heemskerk I, Streichan SJ. 2015. Tissue cartography: compressing bio-image data by dimensional reduction. Nat. Methods 12:1139–42
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Held M, Santeramo I, Wilm B, Murray P, Levy R 2018. Ex vivo live cell tracking in kidney organoids using light sheet fluorescence microscopy. PLOS ONE 13:e0199918
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Hörl D, Rusak FR, Preusser F, Tillberg P, Randel N et al. 2018. BigStitcher: reconstructing high-resolution image datasets of cleared and expanded samples. bioRxiv 343954 . https://doi.org/10.1101/343954
    [Crossref]
  46. Howarth M, Takao K, Hayashi Y, Ting AY 2005. Targeting quantum dots to surface proteins in living cells with biotin ligase. PNAS 102:7583–88
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Huisken J, Swoger J, Del Bene F, Wittbrodt J, Stelzer EHK 2004. Optical sectioning deep inside live embryos by selective plane illumination microscopy. Science 305:1007–9
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Ichikawa T, Nakazato K, Keller PJ, Kajiura-Kobayashi H, Stelzer EH et al. 2014. Live imaging and quantitative analysis of gastrulation in mouse embryos using light-sheet microscopy and 3D tracking tools. Nat. Protoc. 9:575–85
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Islam S, Zeisel A, Joost S, La Manno G, Zajac P et al. 2014. Quantitative single-cell RNA-seq with unique molecular identifiers. Nat. Methods 11:163–66
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Jorand R, Le Corre G, Andilla J, Maandhui A, Frongia C et al. 2012. Deep and clear optical imaging of thick inhomogeneous samples. PLOS ONE 7:e35795
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Junker JP, Noel ES, Guryev V, Peterson KA, Shah G et al. 2014. Genome-wide RNA tomography in the zebrafish embryo. Cell 159:662–75
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Kankaanpää P, Paavolainen L, Tiitta S, Karjalainen M, Päivärinne J et al. 2012. BioImageXD: an open, general-purpose and high-throughput image-processing platform. Nat. Methods 9:683–89
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Keller PJ. 2013. Imaging morphogenesis: technological advances and biological insights. Science 340:1234168
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Keller PJ, Ahrens MB. 2015. Visualizing whole-brain activity and development at the single-cell level using light-sheet microscopy. Neuron 85:462–83
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Keller PJ, Dodt HU. 2011. Light sheet microscopy of living or cleared specimens. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 22:138–43
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Keller PJ, Schmidt AD, Santella A, Khairy K, Bao Z et al. 2010. Fast, high-contrast imaging of animal development with scanned light sheet–based structured-illumination microscopy. Nat. Methods 7:637–42
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Keller PJ, Schmidt AD, Wittbrodt J, Stelzer EHK 2008. Reconstruction of zebrafish early embryonic development by scanned light sheet microscopy. Science 322:1065–69
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Keppler A, Gendreizig S, Gronemeyer T, Pick H, Vogel H, Johnsson K 2003. A general method for the covalent labeling of fusion proteins with small molecules in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 21:86–89
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Khairy K, Lemon W, Amat F, Keller PJ 2018. A preferred curvature-based continuum mechanics framework for modeling embryogenesis. Biophys. J. 114:267–77
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Krzic U, Gunther S, Saunders TE, Streichan SJ, Hufnagel L 2012. Multiview light-sheet microscope for rapid in toto imaging. Nat. Methods 9:730–33
     [Google Scholar]
  61. LeGoff L, Lecuit T. 2015. Mechanical forces and growth in animal tissues. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 8:a019232
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Liu TL, Upadhyayula S, Milkie DE, Singh V, Wang K et al. 2018. Observing the cell in its native state: imaging subcellular dynamics in multicellular organisms. Science 360:eaaq1392
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Liu Z, Keller PJ. 2016. Emerging imaging and genomic tools for developmental systems biology. Dev. Cell 36:597–610
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Liu Z, Legant WR, Chen BC, Li L, Grimm JB et al. 2014. 3D imaging of Sox2 enhancer clusters in embryonic stem cells. eLife 3:e04236
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Los GV, Encell LP, McDougall MG, Hartzell DD, Karassina N et al. 2008. HaloTag: a novel protein labeling technology for cell imaging and protein analysis. ACS Chem. Biol. 3:373–82
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Ma P, Chan DC, Gu S, Watanabe M, Jenkins MW, Rollins AM 2016. Volumetric optical mapping in early embryonic hearts using light-sheet microscopy. Biomed. Opt. Express 7:5120–28
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Ma Y, Wang M, Li W, Zhang Z, Zhang X et al. 2017. Live cell imaging of single genomic loci with quantum dot–labeled TALEs. Nat. Commun. 8:15318
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Maitre JL, Berthoumieux H, Krens SF, Salbreux G, Julicher F et al. 2012. Adhesion functions in cell sorting by mechanically coupling the cortices of adhering cells. Science 338:253–56
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Maizel A, von Wangenheim D, Federici F, Haseloff J, Stelzer EH 2011. High-resolution live imaging of plant growth in near physiological bright conditions using light sheet fluorescence microscopy. Plant J 68:377–85
     [Google Scholar]
  70. McDole K, Guignard L, Amat F, Berger A, Malandain G et al. 2018. In toto imaging and reconstruction of post-implantation mouse development at the single-cell level. Cell 175:859–76.e33
     [Google Scholar]
  71. McGorty R, Liu H, Kamiyama D, Dong Z, Guo S, Huang B 2015. Open-top selective plane illumination microscope for conventionally mounted specimens. Opt. Express 23:16142–53
     [Google Scholar]
  72. McKinney SA, Murphy CS, Hazelwood KL, Davidson MW, Looger LL 2009. A bright and photostable photoconvertible fluorescent protein. Nat. Methods 6:131–33
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Mir M, Reimer A, Stadler M, Tangara A, Hansen AS et al. 2018. Single molecule imaging in live embryos using lattice light-sheet microscopy. Methods Mol. Biol. 1814:541–59
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Moffitt JR, Hao J, Bambah-Mukku D, Lu T, Dulac C, Zhuang X 2016. High-performance multiplexed fluorescence in situ hybridization in culture and tissue with matrix imprinting and clearing. PNAS 113:14456–61
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Monier B, Gettings M, Gay G, Mangeat T, Schott S et al. 2015. Apico-basal forces exerted by apoptotic cells drive epithelium folding. Nature 518:245–48
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Morita H, Grigolon S, Bock M, Krens SF, Salbreux G, Heisenberg CP 2017. The physical basis of coordinated tissue spreading in zebrafish gastrulation. Dev. Cell 40:354–66.e4
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Moro E, Ozhan-Kizil G, Mongera A, Beis D, Wierzbicki C et al. 2012. In vivo Wnt signaling tracing through a transgenic biosensor fish reveals novel activity domains. Dev. Biol. 366:327–40
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Nelles DA, Fang MY, O'Connell MR, Xu JL, Markmiller SJ et al. 2016. Programmable RNA tracking in live cells with CRISPR/Cas9. Cell 165:488–96
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Newman RH, Fosbrink MD, Zhang J 2011. Genetically encodable fluorescent biosensors for tracking signaling dynamics in living cells. Chem. Rev. 111:3614–66
     [Google Scholar]
  80. O'Connell MR, Oakes BL, Sternberg SH, East-Seletsky A, Kaplan M, Doudna JA 2014. Programmable RNA recognition and cleavage by CRISPR/Cas9. Nature 516:263–66
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Okumoto S, Jones A, Frommer WB 2012. Quantitative imaging with fluorescent biosensors. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 63:663–706
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Ovecka M, von Wangenheim D, Tomancak P, Samajova O, Komis G, Samaj J 2018. Multiscale imaging of plant development by light-sheet fluorescence microscopy. Nat. Plants 4:639–50
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Paez-Segala MG, Sun MG, Shtengel G, Viswanathan S, Baird MA et al. 2015. Fixation-resistant photoactivatable fluorescent proteins for CLEM. Nat. Methods 12:215–18
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Paige JS, Wu KY, Jaffrey SR 2011. RNA mimics of green fluorescent protein. Science 333:642–46
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Palero J, Santos SI, Artigas D, Loza-Alvarez P 2010. A simple scanless two-photon fluorescence microscope using selective plane illumination. Opt. Express 18:8491–98
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Parsons MJ, Pisharath H, Yusuff S, Moore JC, Siekmann AF et al. 2009. Notch-responsive cells initiate the secondary transition in larval zebrafish pancreas. Mech. Dev. 126:898–912
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Peng H, Ruan Z, Long F, Simpson JH, Myers EW 2010. V3D enables real-time 3D visualization and quantitative analysis of large-scale biological image data sets. Nat. Biotechnol. 28:348–53
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Pietzsch T, Saalfeld S, Preibisch S, Tomancak P 2015. BigDataViewer: visualization and processing for large image data sets. Nat. Methods 12:481–83
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Pitrone PG, Schindelin J, Stuyvenberg L, Preibisch S, Weber M et al. 2013. OpenSPIM: an open-access light-sheet microscopy platform. Nat. Methods 10:598–99
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Planchon TA, Gao L, Milkie DE, Davidson MW, Galbraith JA et al. 2011. Rapid three-dimensional isotropic imaging of living cells using Bessel beam plane illumination. Nat. Methods 8:417–23
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Power RM, Huisken J. 2017. A guide to light-sheet fluorescence microscopy for multiscale imaging. Nat. Methods 14:360–73
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Preibisch S, Amat F, Stamataki E, Sarov M, Singer RH et al. 2014. Efficient Bayesian-based multiview deconvolution. Nat. Methods 11:645–48
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Preibisch S, Saalfeld S, Rohlfing T, Tomancak P 2009. Bead-based mosaicing of single plane illumination microscopy images using geometric local descriptor matching Presented at Medical Imaging 2009: Image Processing Lake Buena Vista, FL: Feb 8–10
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Preibisch S, Saalfeld S, Schindelin J, Tomancak P 2010. Software for bead-based registration of selective plane illumination microscopy data. Nat. Methods 7:418–19
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Qin P, Parlak M, Kuscu C, Bandaria J, Mir M et al. 2017. Live cell imaging of low- and non-repetitive chromosome loci using CRISPR-Cas9. Nat. Commun. 8:14725
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Redmond LC, Pang CJ, Dumur C, Haar JL, Lloyd JA 2014. Laser capture microdissection of embryonic cells and preparation of RNA for microarray assays. Methods Mol. Biol. 1092:43–60
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Reichmann J, Nijmeijer B, Hossain MJ, Eguren M, Schneider I et al. 2018. Dual-spindle formation in zygotes keeps parental genomes apart in early mammalian embryos. Science 361:189–93
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Richardson DS, Lichtman JW. 2015. Clarifying tissue clearing. Cell 162:246–57
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Rohrbach A. 2009. Artifacts resulting from imaging in scattering media: a theoretical prediction. Opt. Lett. 34:3041–43
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Royer LA, Lemon WC, Chhetri RK, Keller PJ 2018. A practical guide to adaptive light-sheet microscopy. Nat. Protoc. 13:2462–500
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Royer LA, Lemon WC, Chhetri RK, Wan Y, Coleman M et al. 2016. Adaptive light-sheet microscopy for long-term, high-resolution imaging in living organisms. Nat. Biotechnol. 34:1267–78
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Royer LA, Weigert M, Gunther U, Maghelli N, Jug F et al. 2015. ClearVolume: open-source live 3D visualization for light-sheet microscopy. Nat. Methods 12:480–81
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Rozbicki E, Chuai M, Karjalainen AI, Song F, Sang HM et al. 2015. Myosin-II-mediated cell shape changes and cell intercalation contribute to primitive streak formation. Nat. Cell Biol. 17:397–408
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Schiegg M, Hanslovsky P, Haubold C, Koethe U, Hufnagel L, Hamprecht FA 2014. Graphical model for joint segmentation and tracking of multiple dividing cells. Bioinformatics 31:948–56
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M et al. 2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9:676–82
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Schmid B, Shah G, Scherf N, Weber M, Thierbach K et al. 2013. High-speed panoramic light-sheet microscopy reveals global endodermal cell dynamics. Nat. Commun. 4:2207
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Schwend T, Loucks EJ, Ahlgren SC 2010. Visualization of Gli activity in craniofacial tissues of hedgehog-pathway reporter transgenic zebrafish. PLOS ONE 5:e14396
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Sena G, Frentz Z, Birnbaum KD, Leibler S 2011. Quantitation of cellular dynamics in growing Arabidopsis roots with light sheet microscopy. PLOS ONE 6:e21303
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Shcherbakova DM, Baloban M, Emelyanov AV, Brenowitz M, Guo P, Verkhusha VV 2016. Bright monomeric near-infrared fluorescent proteins as tags and biosensors for multiscale imaging. Nat. Commun. 7:12405
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Siedentopf H, Zsigmondy R. 1903. Über Sichtbarmachung und Größenbestimmung ultramikroskopischer Teilchen, mit besonderer Anwendung auf Goldrubingläser. Ann. Phys. 315:1–39
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Silvestri L, Bria A, Sacconi L, Iannello G, Pavone FS 2012. Confocal light sheet microscopy: micron-scale neuroanatomy of the entire mouse brain. Opt. Express 20:20582–98
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Sommer C, Straehle C, Kothe U, Hamprecht FA 2011. Ilastik: interactive learning and segmentation toolkit. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro230–33 Piscataway, NJ: IEEE
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Stegmaier J, Amat F, Lemon WC, McDole K, Wan Y et al. 2016. Real-time three-dimensional cell segmentation in large-scale microscopy data of developing embryos. Dev. Cell 36:225–40
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Stegmaier J, Otte JC, Kobitski A, Bartschat A, Garcia A et al. 2014. Fast segmentation of stained nuclei in terabyte-scale, time resolved 3D microscopy image stacks. PLOS ONE 9:e90036
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Streets AM, Zhang X, Cao C, Pang Y, Wu X et al. 2014. Microfluidic single-cell whole-transcriptome sequencing. PNAS 111:7048–53
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Strnad P, Gunther S, Reichmann J, Krzic U, Balazs B et al. 2016. Inverted light-sheet microscope for imaging mouse pre-implantation development. Nat. Methods 13:139–42
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Swoger J, Pampaloni F, Stelzer EH 2014. Imaging cellular spheroids with a single (selective) plane illumination microscope. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2014:106–13
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Swoger J, Verveer P, Greger K, Huisken J, Stelzer EH 2007. Multi-view image fusion improves resolution in three-dimensional microscopy. Opt. Express 15:8029–42
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Tainaka K, Kuno A, Kubota SI, Murakami T, Ueda HR 2016. Chemical principles in tissue clearing and staining protocols for whole-body cell profiling. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 32:713–41
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Tischer D, Weiner OD. 2014. Illuminating cell signalling with optogenetic tools. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15:551–58
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Tomer R, Khairy K, Amat F, Keller PJ 2012. Quantitative high-speed imaging of entire developing embryos with simultaneous multiview light-sheet microscopy. Nat. Methods 9:755–63
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Trivedi V, Truong TV, Trinh LA, Holland DB, Liebling M, Fraser SE 2015. Dynamic structure and protein expression of the live embryonic heart captured by 2-photon light sheet microscopy and retrospective registration. Biomed. Opt. Express 6:2056–66
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Truong TV, Supatto W, Koos DS, Choi JM, Fraser SE 2011. Deep and fast live imaging with two-photon scanned light-sheet microscopy. Nat. Methods 8:757–60
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Tyagi S. 2009. Imaging intracellular RNA distribution and dynamics in living cells. Nat. Methods 6:331–38
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Udan RS, Piazza VG, Hsu CW, Hadjantonakis AK, Dickinson ME 2014. Quantitative imaging of cell dynamics in mouse embryos using light-sheet microscopy. Development 141:4406–14
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Valm AM, Cohen S, Legant WR, Melunis J, Hershberg U et al. 2017. Applying systems-level spectral imaging and analysis to reveal the organelle interactome. Nature 546:162–67
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Visel A, Thaller C, Eichele G 2004. GenePaint.org: an atlas of gene expression patterns in the mouse embryo. Nucleic Acids Res 32:D552–56
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Voie AH, Burns DH, Spelman FA 1993. Orthogonal-plane fluorescence optical sectioning: three-dimensional imaging of macroscopic biological specimens. J. Microsc. 170:229–36
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Weber M, Huisken J. 2015. In vivo imaging of cardiac development and function in zebrafish using light sheet microscopy. Swiss Med. Wkly. 145:w14227
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Weber M, Scherf N, Meyer AM, Panakova D, Kohl P, Huisken J 2017. Cell-accurate optical mapping across the entire developing heart. eLife 6:e28307
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Wilding D, Pozzi P, Soloviev O, Vdovin G, Verhaegen M 2016. Adaptive illumination based on direct wavefront sensing in a light-sheet fluorescence microscope. Opt. Express 24:24896–906
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Winter PW, Shroff H. 2014. Faster fluorescence microscopy: advances in high speed biological imaging. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 20:46–53
     [Google Scholar]
  133. Wolff C, Tinevez JY, Pietzsch T, Stamataki E, Harich B et al. 2018. Multi-view light-sheet imaging and tracking with the MaMuT software reveals the cell lineage of a direct developing arthropod limb. eLife 7:e34410
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Wu Y, Ghitani A, Christensen R, Santella A, Du Z et al. 2011. Inverted selective plane illumination microscopy (iSPIM) enables coupled cell identity lineaging and neurodevelopmental imaging in Caenorhabditis elegans. PNAS 108:17708–13
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Wu Y, Wawrzusin P, Senseney J, Fischer RS, Christensen R et al. 2013. Spatially isotropic four-dimensional imaging with dual-view plane illumination microscopy. Nat. Biotechnol. 31:1032–38
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Xue Z, Huang K, Cai C, Cai L, Jiang CY et al. 2013. Genetic programs in human and mouse early embryos revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Nature 500:593–97
     [Google Scholar]
  137. Yamashita N, Morita M, Legant WR, Chen BC, Betzig E et al. 2015. Three-dimensional tracking of plus-tips by lattice light-sheet microscopy permits the quantification of microtubule growth trajectories within the mitotic apparatus. J. Biomed. Opt. 20:101206
     [Google Scholar]
  138. Yang Z, Mei L, Xia F, Luo Q, Fu L, Gong H 2015. Dual-slit confocal light sheet microscopy for in vivo whole-brain imaging of zebrafish. Biomed. Opt. Express 6:1797–811
     [Google Scholar]
  139. Yu D, Baird MA, Allen JR, Howe ES, Klassen MP et al. 2015. A naturally monomeric infrared fluorescent protein for protein labeling in vivo. Nat. Methods 12:763–65
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100818-125311
Loading
Light-Sheet Microscopy and Its Potential for Understanding Developmental Processes
Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 35, 655 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100818-125311
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100818-125311
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100818-125311
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error