1932

Abstract

This review aims to illustrate the diversity of measurements that can be made using magnetic resonance techniques, which have the potential to provide insights into chemical engineering systems that cannot readily be achieved using any other method. Perhaps the most notable advantage in using magnetic resonance methods is that both chemistry and transport can be followed in three dimensions, in optically opaque systems, and without the need for tracers to be introduced into the system. Here we focus on hydrodynamics and, in particular, applications to rheology, pipe flow, and fixed-bed and gas-solid fluidized bed reactors. With increasing development of industrially relevant sample environments and undersampling data acquisition strategies that can reduce acquisition times to <1 s, magnetic resonance is finding increasing application in chemical engineering research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061114-123222
2017-06-07
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/chembioeng/8/1/annurev-chembioeng-061114-123222.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061114-123222&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Callaghan PT. 1.  1993. Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Microscopy New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  2. Callaghan PT. 2.  2011. Translational Dynamics and Magnetic Resonance New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  3. Kleinberg RL, Kenyon WE, Mitra PP. 3.  1994. Mechanism of NMR relaxation of fluids in rock. J. Magn. Reson. A 108:206–14 [Google Scholar]
  4. Godefroy S, Korb JP, Fleury M, Bryant RG. 4.  2001. Surface nuclear magnetic relaxation and dynamics of water and oil in macroporous media. Phys. Rev. E 64:021605 [Google Scholar]
  5. Weber D, Mitchell J, McGregor J, Gladden LF. 5.  2009. Comparing strengths of surface interactions for reactants and solvents in porous catalysts using two-dimensional NMR relaxation correlations. J. Phys. Chem. C 113:6610–15 [Google Scholar]
  6. Gladden LF, Mitchell J. 6.  2011. Measuring adsorption, diffusion and flow in chemical engineering: applications of magnetic resonance to porous media. New J. Phys. 13:035001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Simoneau C, McCarthy MJ, Kauten RJ, German JB. 7.  1991. Crystallization dynamics in model emulsions from magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 68:481–87 [Google Scholar]
  8. Mansfield P, Grannell PK. 8.  1973. NMR diffraction in solids. J. Phys. C. 6:L422–26 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen C, Gladden LF, Mantle MD. 9.  2014. Direct visualization of in vitro drug mobilization from Lescol XL tablets using two-dimensional 19F and 1H magnetic resonance imaging. Mol. Pharm. 11:630–37 [Google Scholar]
  10. Akpa BS, Mantle MD, Sederman AJ, Gladden LF. 10.  2005. In situ 13C DEPT-MRI as a tool to spatially resolve chemical conversion and selectivity of a heterogeneous catalytic reaction occurring in a fixed-bed reactor. Chem. Commun.2741–43
  11. Sederman AJ, Mantle MD, Dunckley CP, Huang Z, Gladden LF. 11.  2005. In situ MRI study of 1-octene isomerisation and hydrogenation within a trickle-bed reactor. Catal. Lett. 103:1–8 [Google Scholar]
  12. Newling B, Poirier CC, Zhi Y, Rioux JA, Coristine AJ. 12.  et al. 2004. Velocity imaging of highly turbulent gas flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93:154503 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gladden LF. 13.  2003. Magnetic resonance: ongoing and future role in chemical engineering research. AIChE J 49:2–9 [Google Scholar]
  14. van de Meent J-W, Sederman AJ, Gladden LF, Goldstein RE. 14.  2010. Measurement of cytoplasmic streaming in single cell plants by magnetic resonance velocimetry. J. Fluid Mech. 642:5–14 [Google Scholar]
  15. Sederman AJ, Mantle MD, Buckley C, Gladden LF. 15.  2004. MRI technique for measurement of velocity vectors, acceleration, and autocorrelation functions in turbulent flow. J. Magn. Reson. 166:182–89 [Google Scholar]
  16. Sederman AJ, Gladden LF. 16.  2001. Magnetic resonance visualization of single- and two-phase flow in porous media. Magn. Reson. Imaging 19:339–43 [Google Scholar]
  17. Singer PM, Leu G, Fordham EJ, Sen PN. 17.  2006. Low magnetic fields for flow propagators in permeable rocks. J. Magn. Reson. 183:167–77 [Google Scholar]
  18. Scheven UM, Verganelakis D, Harris R, Johns ML, Gladden LF. 18.  2005. Quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance measurements of preasymptotic dispersion in flow through porous media. Phys. Fluids 17:117107 [Google Scholar]
  19. Johns ML, Sederman AJ, Gladden LF, Wilson A, Davies S. 19.  2003. Using MR techniques to probe permeability reduction in rock cores. AIChE J 49:1076–84 [Google Scholar]
  20. Verganelakis DA, Crawshaw J, Johns ML, Mantle MD, Scheven U. 20.  et al. 2005. Displacement propagators of brine flowing within different types of sedimentary rock. Magn. Reson. Imaging 23:349–51 [Google Scholar]
  21. Edelstein WA, Hutchinson JMS, Johnson G, Redpath T. 21.  1980. Spin warp NMR imaging and applications to human whole-body imaging. Phys. Med. Biol 25:751–56 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hennig J, Nauerth A, Friedburg H. 22.  1986. RARE imaging—a fast imaging method for clinical MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 3:823–33 [Google Scholar]
  23. Mansfield P. 23.  1977. Multi-planar image formation using NMR spin echoes. J. Phys. C. 10:L55–58 [Google Scholar]
  24. Haase A, Frahm J, Matthaei D, Hanicke W, Merboldt KD. 24.  1986. FLASH imaging—rapid NMR imaging using low flip-angle pulses. J. Magn. Reson. 67:258–66 [Google Scholar]
  25. Mantle MD, Sederman AJ. 25.  2003. Dynamic MRI in chemical process and reaction engineering. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 43:3–60 [Google Scholar]
  26. Ahn CB, Kim JH, Cho ZH. 26.  1986. High-speed spiral-scan echo planar NMR imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 5:2–7 [Google Scholar]
  27. Tayler AB, Holland DJ, Sederman AJ, Gladden LF. 27.  2011. Time resolved velocity measurements of unsteady systems using spiral imaging. J. Magn. Reson. 211:1–10 [Google Scholar]
  28. Nyquist H. 28.  1928. Certain topics in telegraph transmission theory. Trans. A.I.E.E. 47:617–44 [Google Scholar]
  29. Shannon CE. 29.  1949. Communication in the presence of noise. Proc. I.R.E. 37:10–21 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hogbom JA. 30.  1974. Aperture synthesis with a non-regular distribution of interferometer baselines. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 15:417–26 [Google Scholar]
  31. Wiaux Y, Jacques L, Puy G, Scaife AMM, Vandergheynst P. 31.  2009. Compressed sensing imaging techniques for radio interferometry. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 395:1733–42 [Google Scholar]
  32. Candès EJ, Romberg JK, Tao T. 32.  2006. Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 59:1207–23 [Google Scholar]
  33. Donoho DL. 33.  2006. Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 52:1289–306 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lustig M, Donoho DL, Pauly JM. 34.  2007. Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 58:1182–95 [Google Scholar]
  35. Bretthorst GL, Hung C, d'Avignon DA, Ackerman JJH. 35.  1988. Bayesian analysis of time-domain magnetic resonance signals. J. Magn. Reson. 79:369–76 [Google Scholar]
  36. Bretthorst GL, Hutton WC, Garbow JR, Ackerman JJH. 36.  2005. Exponential parameter estimation (in NMR) using Bayesian probability theory. Concepts Magn. Reson. 27A:55–63 [Google Scholar]
  37. Xing D, Gibbs SJ, Derbyshire JA, Fordham EJ, Carpenter TA, Hall LD. 37.  1995. Bayesian analysis for quantitative NMR flow and diffusion imaging. J. Magn. Reson. B 106:1–9 [Google Scholar]
  38. Wise RW, Newling B, Gates ARC, Xing D, Carpenter TA, Hall LD. 38.  1996. Measurement of pulsatile flow using MRI and a Bayesian technique of probability analysis. Magn. Reson. Imaging 14:173–85 [Google Scholar]
  39. Benning M, Gladden L, Holland D, Schönlieb C-S, Valkonen T. 39.  2014. Phase reconstruction from velocity-encoded MRI measurements—a survey of sparsity promoting variational approaches. J. Magn. Reson. 238:26–43 [Google Scholar]
  40. Holland DJ, Blake A, Tayler AB, Sederman AJ, Gladden LF. 40.  2010. A Bayesian approach to characterising multi-phase flows using magnetic resonance: application to bubble flow. J. Magn. Reson. 2011:83–87 [Google Scholar]
  41. Callaghan PT. 41.  2008. Rheo NMR and shear banding. Rheol. Acta 47:243–55 [Google Scholar]
  42. Callaghan PT. 42.  1999. Rheo-NMR: nuclear magnetic resonance and the rheology of complex fluids. Rep. Prog. Phys. 62:599–670 [Google Scholar]
  43. Hollingsworth KG, Johns ML. 43.  2004. Rheo-nuclear magnetic resonance of emulsion systems. J. Rheol. 48:787–803 [Google Scholar]
  44. Domenico G, Migliori M, Di Sanzo R, Rossi CO, Ruffolo SA, de Cindio B. 44.  2009. Characterisation of dairy emulsions by NMR and rheological techniques. Food Hydrocoll 23:619–28 [Google Scholar]
  45. Britton MM, Callaghan PT. 45.  1997. Two-phase shear band structures at uniform stress. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78:4930–33 [Google Scholar]
  46. Britton MM, Callaghan PT. 46.  1997. Nuclear magnetic resonance visualization of anomalous flow in a cone-and-plate geometry. J. Rheol. 41:1365–86 [Google Scholar]
  47. Douglass BS, Colby RH, Madsen LA, Callaghan PT. 47.  2008. Rheo-NMR of wormlike micelles formed from nonionic pluronic surfactants. Macromolecules 41:804–14 [Google Scholar]
  48. Feindel KW, Callaghan PT. 48.  2010. Anomalous shear banding: multidimensional dynamics under fluctuating slip conditions. Rheol. Acta 49:1003–13 [Google Scholar]
  49. Brown JR, Callaghan PT. 49.  2011. Changing micellar order, lever rule behaviour and spatio-temporal dynamics in shear-banding at the onset of the stress plateau. Soft Matter 7:10472–82 [Google Scholar]
  50. Brown JR, Callaghan PT. 50.  2010. Measurement of vorticity diffusion by NMR microscopy. J. Magn. Reson. 204:21–25 [Google Scholar]
  51. Davies CJ, Sederman AJ, Pipe CJ, McKinley GH, Gladden LF, Johns ML. 51.  2010. Rapid measurement of transient velocity evolution using GERVAIS. J. Magn. Reson. 202:93–101 [Google Scholar]
  52. Evertz LQ, Rassi EM, Kennedy JRM, Codd SL, Seymour JD. 52.  2012. Oscillatory flow phenomena in simple and complex fluids. Appl. Magn. Reson. 42:211–25 [Google Scholar]
  53. Blythe TW, Sederman AJ, Mitchell J, Stitt EH, York APE, Gladden LF. 53.  2015. Characterising the rheology of non-Newtonian fluids using PFG-NMR and cumulant analysis. J. Magn. Reson. 255:122–31 [Google Scholar]
  54. Packer KJ, Rees C. 54.  1972. Pulsed NMR studies of restricted diffusion. I. Droplet size distributions in emulsions. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 40:206–18 [Google Scholar]
  55. Johns ML, Hollingsworth KG. 55.  2007. Characterisation of emulsion systems using NMR and MRI. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 50:51–70 [Google Scholar]
  56. Lingwood IA, Chandrasekera TC, Kolz J, Fridjonsson EO, Johns ML. 56.  2012. Emulsion droplet sizing using low-field NMR with chemical shift resolution and the block gradient pulse method. J. Magn. Reson. 214:281–88 [Google Scholar]
  57. Hafid H, Ovarlez G, Toussaint F, Jezequel PH, Roussel N. 57.  2015. Assessment of potential concrete and mortar rheometry artifacts using magnetic resonance imaging. Cement Concrete Res 71:29–35 [Google Scholar]
  58. Fall A, Bertrand F, Hautemayou D, Mezière C, Moucheront P. 58.  et al. 2015. Macroscopic discontinuous shear thickening versus local shear jamming in cornstarch. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114:098301 [Google Scholar]
  59. de Cagny H, Fall A, Denn MM, Bonn D. 59.  2015. Local rheology of suspensions and dry granular materials. J. Rheol. 59:957–69 [Google Scholar]
  60. Oh S, Song Y-Q, Garagash DI, Lecampion B, Desroches J. 60.  2015. Pressure-driven suspension flow near jamming. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114:088301 [Google Scholar]
  61. Harich R, Blythe TW, Hermes M, Zaccarelli E, Sederman AJ. 61.  et al. 2016. Gravitational collapse of depletion-induced colloidal gels. Soft Matter 12:4300–8 [Google Scholar]
  62. Akpa BS, Matthews SM, Sederman AJ, Yunus K, Fisher AC. 62.  et al. 2007. Study of miscible and immiscible flows in a microchannel using magnetic resonance imaging. Anal. Chem. 79:6128–34 [Google Scholar]
  63. Zhang J, Balcom BJ. 63.  2010. Magnetic resonance imaging of two-component liquid-liquid flow in a circular capillary tube. Phys. Rev. E 81:056318 [Google Scholar]
  64. Xia Y, Callaghan PT, Jeffrey KR. 64.  1992. Imaging velocity profiles: flow through an abrupt contraction and expansion. AIChE J 38:1408–20 [Google Scholar]
  65. Mullin T, Seddon JRT, Mantle MD, Sederman AJ. 65.  2009. Bifurcation phenomena in the flow through a sudden expansion in a circular pipe. Phys. Fluids 21:014110 [Google Scholar]
  66. Jossic L, Magnin A. 66.  2005. Structuring of gelled suspensions flowing through a sudden three-dimensional expansion. J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 127:201–12 [Google Scholar]
  67. Moraczewski T, Shapley NC. 67.  2006. The effect of inlet conditions on concentrated suspension flows in abrupt expansions. Phys. Fluids 18:123303 [Google Scholar]
  68. Tozzi EJ, Lavenson DM, McCarthy MJ, Powell RL. 68.  2013. Effect of fiber length, flow rate, and concentration on velocity profiles of cellulosic fiber suspensions. Acta Mech 224:2301–10 [Google Scholar]
  69. Singer JR. 69.  1959. Blood flow rates by nuclear magnetic resonance measurements. Science 130:1652–53 [Google Scholar]
  70. Osán TM, Ollé JM, Carpinella M, Cerioni LMC, Pusiol DJ. 70.  et al. 2011. Fast measurements of average flow velocity by low-field 1H NMR. J. Magn. Reson. 209:116–22 [Google Scholar]
  71. Fridjonsson EO, Stanwix PL, Johns ML. 71.  2014. Earth's field NMR flow meter: preliminary quantitative measurements. J. Magn. Reson. 245:110–15 [Google Scholar]
  72. Tayler AB, Holland DJ, Sederman AJ, Gladden LF. 72.  2012. Applications of ultra-fast MRI to high voidage bubbly flow: measurement of bubble size distributions, interfacial area and hydrodynamics. Chem. Eng. Sci. 71:468–83 [Google Scholar]
  73. Holland DJ, Blake A, Tayler AB, Sederman AJ, Gladden LF. 73.  2012. Bubble size measurement using Bayesian magnetic resonance. Chem. Eng. Sci. 84:735–45 [Google Scholar]
  74. Tayler AB, Holland DJ, Sederman AJ, Gladden LF. 74.  2012. Exploring the origins of turbulence in multiphase flow using compressed sensing MRI. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108:264505 [Google Scholar]
  75. Mougin G, Magnaudet J. 75.  2002. Path instability of a rising bubble. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88:014502 [Google Scholar]
  76. Shew WL, Pinton J-F. 76.  2006. Dynamical model of bubble path instability. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97:144508 [Google Scholar]
  77. Gladden LF, Mantle MD, Sederman AJ. 77.  2005. Quantifying physics and chemistry at multiple length-scales using magnetic resonance techniques. Adv. Chem. Eng. 30:63–135 [Google Scholar]
  78. Gladden LF, Mantle MD, Sederman AJ. 78.  2006. Magnetic resonance imaging of catalysts and catalytic processes. Adv. Catal. 50:1–75 [Google Scholar]
  79. Koptyug IV, Ilyina LY, Matveev AV, Sagdeev RZ, Parmon VN, Altobelli SA. 79.  2001. Liquid and gas flow and related phenomena in monolithic catalysts studied by 1H NMR micrimaging. Catal. Today 69:385–92 [Google Scholar]
  80. Heibel AK, Scheenen TWJ, Heiszwolf JJ, Van As H, Kapteijn F, Moulijn JA. 80.  2001. Gas and liquid phase distribution and their effect on reactor performance in the monolith film flow reactor. Chem. Eng. Sci. 56:5935–44 [Google Scholar]
  81. Mantle MD, Sederman AJ, Gladden LF, Raymahasay S, Winterbottom JM, Stitt EH. 81.  2002. Dynamic MRI visualization of two-phase flow in a ceramic monolith. AIChE J 48:909–12 [Google Scholar]
  82. Heibel AK, Vergeldt FJ, Van As H, Kapteijn F, Moulijn J, Boger T. 82.  2003. Gas and liquid distribution in the monolith film flow reactor. AIChE J 49:3007–17 [Google Scholar]
  83. Sederman AJ, Heras JJ, Mantle MD, Gladden LF. 83.  2007. MRI strategies for characterising two-phase flow in parallel channel ceramic monoliths. Catal. Today 128:3–12 [Google Scholar]
  84. Ramskill NP, Gladden LF, York APE, Sederman AJ, Mitchell J, Hardstone KA. 84.  2013. Understanding the operation and preparation of diesel particulate filters using a multi-faceted nuclear magnet resonance approach. Catal. Today 216:104–110 [Google Scholar]
  85. Yuen EHL, Sederman AJ, Gladden LF. 85.  2002. In situ magnetic resonance visualisation of the spatial variation of catalytic conversion within a fixed-bed reactor. Appl. Catal. A 232:29–38 [Google Scholar]
  86. Koptyug IV, Lysova AA, Kulikov AV, Kirillov VA, Parmon VN, Sagdeev RZ. 86.  2004. Functional imaging and NMR spectroscopy of an operating gas-liquid-solid catalytic reactor. Appl. Catal. A 267:143–48 [Google Scholar]
  87. Kirillov VA, Koptyug IV. 87.  2005. Critical phenomena in trickle-bed reactors. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44:9727–38 [Google Scholar]
  88. Gladden LF, Abegão FJR, Dunckley CP, Holland DJ, Sankey MH, Sederman AJ. 88.  2010. MRI: operando measurements of temperature, hydrodynamics and local reaction rate in a heterogeneous catalytic reactor. Catal. Today 155:157–63 [Google Scholar]
  89. Ulpts J, Dreher W, Klink M, Thöming J. 89.  2015. NMR imaging of gas phase hydrogenation in a packed bed flow reactor. Appl. Catal. A 502:340–49 [Google Scholar]
  90. Roberts ST, Renshaw MP, Lutecki M, McGregor J, Sederman AJ. 90.  et al. 2013. Operando magnetic resonance: monitoring the evolution of conversion and product distribution during the heterogeneous catalytic ethane oligomerisation reaction. Chem. Commun. 49:10519–21 [Google Scholar]
  91. Wu Y, d'Agostino C, Holland DJ, Gladden LF. 91.  2014. In situ study of reaction kinetics using compressed sensing NMR. Chem. Commun. 50:14137–40 [Google Scholar]
  92. Sederman AJ, Johns ML, Bramley AS, Alexander P, Gladden LF. 92.  1997. Magnetic resonance imaging of liquid flow and pore structure within packed beds. Chem. Eng. Sci. 52:2239–50 [Google Scholar]
  93. Sederman AJ, Johns ML, Alexander P, Gladden LF. 93.  1998. Structure-flow correlations in packed beds. Chem. Eng. Sci. 53:2117–28 [Google Scholar]
  94. Johns ML, Sederman AJ, Bramley AS, Gladden LF, Alexander P. 94.  2000. Local transitions in flow phenomena through packed beds identified by MRI. AIChE J 46:2151–61 [Google Scholar]
  95. Manz B, Alexander P, Gladden LF. 95.  1999. Correlations between dispersion and structure in porous media probed by nuclear magnetic resonance. Phys. Fluids 11:259–67 [Google Scholar]
  96. Götz J, Zick K, Heinen C, König T. 96.  2002. Visualisation of flow processes in packed beds with NMR imaging: determination of the local porosity, velocity vector and local dispersion coefficients. Chem. Eng. Process. 41:611–29 [Google Scholar]
  97. Suekane T, Yokouchi Y, Hirai S. 97.  2003. Inertial flow structures in a single-packed bed of spheres. AIChE J 49:10–17 [Google Scholar]
  98. Tang D, Jess A, Ren X, Blümich B, Stapf S. 98.  2004. Axial dispersion and wall effects in narrow fixed bed reactors: a comparative study based on RTD and NMR measurements. Chem. Eng. Technol. 27:866–73 [Google Scholar]
  99. Manz B, Gladden LF, Warren PB. 99.  1999. Flow and dispersion in porous media: lattice-Boltzmann and NMR studies. AIChE J 45:1845–54 [Google Scholar]
  100. Robbins DJ, El-Bachir MS, Gladden LF, Cant RS, von Harbou E. 100.  2012. CFD modelling of single-phase flow in a packed bed with MRI validation. AIChE J 58:3904–15 [Google Scholar]
  101. Sederman AJ, Gladden LF. 101.  2001. Magnetic resonance imaging as a quantitative probe of gas-liquid distribution and wetting efficiency in trickle-bed reactors. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2001:2615–28 [Google Scholar]
  102. Sankey MH, Holland DJ, Sederman AJ, Gladden LF. 102.  2009. Magnetic resonance velocity imaging of liquid and gas two-phase flow in packed beds. J. Magn. Reson. 196:142–48 [Google Scholar]
  103. Collins JHP, Sederman AJ, Gladden LF, Afeworki M, Kushnerick JD, Thomann H. 103.  2017. Characterising gas behaviour during gas–liquid co-current up-flow in packed beds using magnetic resonance imaging. Chem. Eng. Sci. 157:2–14 [Google Scholar]
  104. Dietrich W, Anadon L, Sederman A, Gladden L, Agar D. 104.  2012. Simulation studies on the performance enhancement in periodically operated trickle-bed reactors based on experimental local liquid distribution measurements. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51:1672–79 [Google Scholar]
  105. Nguyen NL, Reimert R, Hardy EH. 105.  2006. Application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to determine the influence of fluid dynamics on desulfurization in bench scale reactors. Chem. Eng. Technol. 29:820–27 [Google Scholar]
  106. Larachi F, Iliuta I, Chen M, Grandjean BPA. 106.  1999. Onset of pulsing in trickle beds: evaluation of current tools and state-of-the-art correlation. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 77:751–58 [Google Scholar]
  107. Gladden LF, Anadon LD, Lim MHM, Sederman AJ, Stitt EH. 107.  2005. Insights into the mechanism of the trickle-to-pulse transition in trickle-bed reactors. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44:6320–31 [Google Scholar]
  108. Anadon LD, Sederman AJ, Gladden LF. 108.  2006. Mechanism of the trickle-to-pulse transition in fixed-bed reactors. AIChE J 52:1522–32 [Google Scholar]
  109. Ng KM. 109.  1986. A model for the flow regime transitions in concurrent downflow trickle-bed reactors. AIChE J 32:114–22 [Google Scholar]
  110. Lasič S, Stepišnik J, Mohorič A, Serša I, Planinšič G. 110.  2006. Autocorrelation spectra of an air-fluidized granular system measured by NMR. Europhys. Lett. 75:887–93 [Google Scholar]
  111. Savelsberg R, Demco DE, Blümich B, Stapf S. 111.  2002. Particle motion in gas-fluidized granular systems by pulsed-field gradient nuclear magnetic resonance. Phys. Rev. E 65:020301 [Google Scholar]
  112. Fennell PS, Davidson JF, Dennis JS, Gladden LF, Hayhurst AN. 112.  et al. 2005. A study of the mixing of solids in gas-fluidized beds, using ultra-fast MRI. Chem. Eng. Sci. 60:2085–88 [Google Scholar]
  113. Rees AC, Davidson JF, Dennis JS, Fennell PS, Gladden LF. 113.  et al. 2006. The nature of the flow just above the perforated plate distributor of a gas-fluidised bed, as imaged using magnetic resonance. Chem. Eng. Sci. 61:6002–15 [Google Scholar]
  114. Boyce CM, Rice NP, Davidson JF, Sederman AJ, Dennis JS, Holland DJ. 114.  2016. Magnetic resonance imaging of gas dynamics in the freeboard of fixed beds and bubbling fluidized beds. Chem. Eng. Sci. 147:13–20 [Google Scholar]
  115. Müller CR, Davidson JF, Dennis JS, Fennell PS, Gladden LF. 115.  et al. 2006. Real-time measurement of bubbling phenomena in a three-dimensional gas-fluidized bed using ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96:154504 [Google Scholar]
  116. Müller CR, Holland DJ, Davidson JF, Dennis JS, Gladden LF. 116.  et al. 2007. Rapid two-dimensional imaging of bubbles and slugs in a three-dimensional, gas-solid, two-phase flow system using ultrafast magnetic resonance. Phys. Rev. E 75:020302 [Google Scholar]
  117. Müller CR, Holland DJ, Sederman AJ, Dennis JS, Gladden LF. 117.  2010. Magnetic resonance measurements of high-velocity particle motion in a three-dimensional gas-solid spouted bed. Phys. Rev. E 82:050302 [Google Scholar]
  118. Pore M, Holland DJ, Chandrasekera TC, Müller CR, Sederman AJ. 118.  et al. 2010. Magnetic resonance studies of a gas-solids fluidised bed: Jet-jet and jet-wall interactions. Particuology 8:617–22 [Google Scholar]
  119. Pore M, Chandrasekera TC, Holland DJ, Wang A, Wang F. 119.  et al. 2012. Magnetic resonance studies of jets in a gas-solid fluidised bed. Particuology 10:161–69 [Google Scholar]
  120. Köhl MH, Lu G, Third JR, Häberlin M, Kasper L. 120.  et al. 2013. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study of jet formation in packed beds. Chem. Eng. Sci. 97:406–12 [Google Scholar]
  121. Müller CR, Holland DJ, Sederman AJ, Scott SA, Dennis JS, Gladden LF. 121.  2008. Granular temperature: comparison of magnetic resonance measurements with Discrete Element Model simulations. Powder Technol 184:241–53 [Google Scholar]
  122. Müller CR, Holland DJ, Third JR, Sederman AJ, Dennis JS, Gladden LF. 122.  2011. Multi-scale magnetic resonance measurements and validation of Discrete Element Model simulations. Particuology 9:330–41 [Google Scholar]
  123. Holland DJ, Mareshdeh Q, Müller CR, Wang F, Dennis JS. 123.  et al. 2009. Comparison of ECVT and MR measurements of voidage in a gas-fluidized bed. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48:172–81 [Google Scholar]
  124. Chandrasekera TC, Wang A, Holland DJ, Mareshdeh Q, Pore M. 124.  et al. 2012. A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and electrical capacitance tomography: an air jet through a bed of particles. Powder Technol 227:86–95 [Google Scholar]
  125. Pore M, Ong GH, Boyce CM, Materazzi M, Gargiuli J. 125.  et al. 2015. A comparison of magnetic resonance, X-ray and positron emission particle tracking measurements of a single jet of gas entering a bed of particles. Chem. Eng. Sci. 122:210–18 [Google Scholar]
  126. Glöggler S, Colell J, Appelt S. 126.  2013. Para-hydrogen perspectives in hyperpolarized NMR. J. Magn. Reson. 235:130–42 [Google Scholar]
  127. Graafen D. 127.  2014. 1H NMR spectroscopy and MR imaging with hyperpolarised substances. Ann. R. NMR S. 82:167–215 [Google Scholar]
  128. Mitchell J, Gladden LF, Chandrasekera TC, Fordham EJ. 128.  2014. Low-field permanent magnets for industrial process and quality control. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 76:1–60 [Google Scholar]
  129. Blanchard JW, Sjolander TF, King JP, Ledbetter MP, Levine EH. 129.  et al. 2015. Measurement of untruncated nuclear spins interactions via zero- to ultralow-field nuclear magnetic resonance. Phys. Rev. B 92:220202 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061114-123222
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061114-123222
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error