1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
  4. Volume 14, 2023
  5. Article

Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering

Volume 14, 2023

Role of International Oil Companies in the Net-Zero Emission Energy Transition

Abstract

Scientific and engineering capabilities in hydrocarbon supply chains developed over decades in international oil and gas companies (IOCs) uniquely position these companies to drive rapid scale-up and transition to a net-zero emission economy. Flexible large-scale production of energy carriers such as hydrogen, ammonia, methanol, and other synthetic fuels produced with low- or zero-emission renewable power, nuclear energy, or hydrogen derived from natural gas with carbon capture and storage will enable long-distance transport and permanent storage options for clean energy. Use of energy carriers can overcome the inherent constraints of a fully electrified energy system by providing the energy and power densities, as well as transport and storage capacity, required to achieve energy supply and security in a net-zero emission economy, and over time allow optimization to the lowest cost for a consumer anywhere on the globe.

Keyword(s): energy carrier, energy density, energy storage, energy transport, net-zero emission, oil and gas
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-092220-030446
2023-06-08
2024-10-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/chembioeng/14/1/annurev-chembioeng-092220-030446.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-092220-030446&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    bp. 2022.. bp Statistical Review of World Energy 2022. London:: bp, 71st ed.. https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2022-full-report.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2.
    Smil V. 2021.. Grand Transitions: How the Modern World Was Made. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  3. 3.
    Clark G. 2007.. A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  4. 4.
    Deutch J, Karplus V, Majumdar A, Smit D, Sweeney J, Fedor D. 2022.. Making demonstrations effective: report of the Schultz Energy and Climate Task Force's Industry Decarbonization Work Group. Rep. , Hoover Inst., Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA:
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 5.
    Xiao X, Li F, Ye Z, Xi Z, Ma D, Yang S. 2020.. Optimal configuration of energy storage for remotely delivering wind power by ultra-high voltage lines. . J. Energy Storage 31::101571
     [Google Scholar]
  6. 6.
    Alava JJ, Singh GG. 2022.. Changing air pollution and CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 pandemic: lesson learned and future equity concerns of post-COVID recovery. . Environ. Sci. Policy 130::1–8
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 7.
    Sherpa S. 2022.. Estimated total annual building energy consumption at the block and lot level for NYC. Map , Sustain. Eng. Lab, Columbia Univ., NY:, accessed Oct. 26, 2022. https://qsel.columbia.edu/nycenergy
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 8.
    Borrmann R, Rehfeldt K, Wallasch A-K, Lüers S. 2018.. Capacity densities of European offshore wind farms. Rep. SP18004A1 , Deutsche WindGuard, Varel, Ger.: https://www.windguard.com/publications-wind-energy-statistics.html?file=files/cto_layout/img/unternehmen/veroeffentlichungen/2018/Capacity%20Density%20of%20European%20Offshore%20Windfarmslr.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 9.
    Ong S, Campbell C, Denholm P, Margolis R, Heath G. 2013.. Land-use requirements for solar power plants in the United States. Tech. Rep., NREL/TP-6A20-56290 , Natl. Renew. Energy Lab. Oak Ridge, TN:. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/56290.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 10.
    Denholm P, Margolis RM. 2008.. Land-use requirements and the per-capita solar footprint for photovoltaic generation in the United States. . Energy Policy 36:(9):3531–43
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 11.
    Natl. Renew. Energy Lab. 2022.. Land use by system technology. https://www.nrel.gov/analysis/tech-size.html
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 12.
    Antonini EGA, Caldeira K. 2021.. Spatial constraints in large-scale expansion of wind power plants. . PNAS 118:(27):e2103875118
     [Google Scholar]
  13. 13.
    Tollefson J. 2021.. Top climate scientists are skeptical that nations will rein in global warming. . Nature 599::22–24
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 14.
    Intergov. Panel Clim. Change. 2022.. Climate change 2022: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Rep. , IPCC Work. Group II , Geneva:
     [Google Scholar]
  15. 15.
    Shell. 2014.. The Petroleum Handbook. Saint Louis:: Elsevier Sci, 6th ed.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. 16.
    Mokhatab S, Mak J, Valappil JV, Wood DA. 2014.. Handbook of Liquefied Natural Gas. Amsterdam:: Elsevier/Gulf Prof. Publ
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 17.
    Falk G, Herrmann F, Schmid GB. 1983.. Energy forms or energy carriers?. Am. J. Phys. 51:(12):1074–77
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 18.
    Schellenberger M. 2020.. Apocalypse Never: Why Environmental Alarmism Hurts Us All. New York:: HarperCollins
     [Google Scholar]
  19. 19.
    ICCA-Chem. 2019.. The global chemical industry: catalyzing growth and addressing our world's sustainability challenges. Rep. , Oxford Econ., Oxford, UK:. https://www.oxfordeconomics.com/resource/the-global-chemical-industry-catalyzing-growth-and-addressing-our-world-sustainability-challenges/
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 20.
    Bellone D, Hall S, Kar J, Olufon D. 2021.. The big choices for oil and gas in navigating the energy transition. . McKinsey, March 10. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/oil-and-gas/our-insights/the-big-choices-for-oil-and-gas-in-navigating-the-energy-transition
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 21.
    Int. Energy Agency. 2021.. Net zero by 2050: a roadmap for the global energy sector. Rep. , Int. Energy Agency, Paris:. https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 22.
    Int. Energy Agency. 2018.. Share of oil reserves, oil production and oil upstream investment by company type, 2018. Rep. , Int. Energy Agency, Paris:. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/share-of-oil-reserves-oil-production-and-oil-upstream-investment-by-company-type-2018
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 23.
    Wolak F. 2021.. Long-term resource adequacy in wholesale electricity markets with significant intermittent renewables. Doc., Stanford Energy, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA:. https://web.stanford.edu/group/fwolak/cgi-bin/sites/default/files/NBER_Intermittent_wolak_final.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 24.
    Ip G. 2021.. Why financing the multi-trillion-dollar transition to net zero isn't that hard. . Wall Street Journal, Novemb. 4. https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-financing-the-multi-trillion-dollar-transition-to-net-zero-isnt-that-hard-11636018200
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 25.
    McKinsey. 2022.. The net zero transition: what it would cost, what it could bring. Rep. , McKinsey, New York:. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our-insights/the-net-zero-transition-what-it-would-cost-what-it-could-bring
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 26.
    Roser M. 2022.. The Our World in Data–Grapher, accessed Jan. 29, 2023. https://ourworldindata.org/owid-grapher
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 27.
    Kharas H. 2017.. The unprecedented expansion of the global middle class: an update. Glob. Econ. Dev. Work. Pap. 100 , Brookings Inst., Washington, DC:. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/global_20170228_global-middle-class.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 28.
    Intergov. Panel Clim. Change. 2007.. Climate change 2007: mitigation of climate change, energy carriers. Rep. AR4 WGIII 4.3.4 , Intergov. Panel Clim. Change, Geneva:. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar4/wg3/
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 29.
    US Dep. Energy. 2022.. Hydrogen basics, accessed Sept. 29, 2022. https://www.nrel.gov/research/eds-hydrogen.html
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 30.
    Orecchini F. 2006.. The era of energy vectors. . Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 31:(14):1951–54
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 31.
    Modisha PM, Ouma CNM, Garidzirai R, Wasserscheid P, Bessarabov D. 2019.. The prospect of hydrogen storage using liquid organic hydrogen carriers. . Energy Fuels 33:(4):2778–96
     [Google Scholar]
  32. 32.
    Patterson BD, Mo F, Borgschulte A, Hillestad M, Joos F, et al. 2019.. Renewable CO2 recycling and synthetic fuel production in a marine environment. . PNAS 116:(25):12212–19
     [Google Scholar]
  33. 33.
    Intergov. Panel Clim. Change. 2007.. Working Group III: Mitigation of Climate Change, 4.3.4 energy carriers. IPCC Fourth Assess. Rep. Clim. Change 2007. https://archive.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg3/en/ch4s4-3-4.html
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 34.
    de Kleijne K, Hanssen SV, van Dinteren L, Huijbregts MAJ, van Zelm R, de Coninck H. 2022.. Limits to Paris compatibility of CO2 capture and utilization. . One Earth 5:(2):168–85
     [Google Scholar]
  35. 35.
    Gür TM. 2018.. Review of electrical energy storage technologies, materials and systems: challenges and prospects for large-scale grid storage. . Energy Environ. Sci. 11:(10):2696–767
     [Google Scholar]
  36. 36.
    Denholm P, Brown P, Cole W, Mai T, Sergi B. 2022.. Examining supply-side options to achieve 100% clean electricity by 2035. Doc., NREL/TP6A40-81644 , Natl. Renew. Energy Lab., Golden, CO:. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy22osti/81644.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 37.
    Fasihi M, Breyer C. 2020.. Baseload electricity and hydrogen supply based on hybrid PV-wind power plants. . J. Clean. Prod. 243::118466
     [Google Scholar]
  38. 38.
    Vidas L, Castro R. 2021.. Recent developments on hydrogen production technologies: state-of-the-art review with a focus on green-electrolysis. . Appl. Sci. 11:(23):11363
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 39.
    Sandalow D, Friedmann J, Aines R, McCormick C, McCoy S, et al. 2019.. ICEF industrial heat decarbonization roadmap. Rep. , Innov. Cool Earth Forum. https://cdrlaw.org/resources/icef-industrial-heat-decarbonization-roadmap/
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 40.
    Int. At. Energy Agency. 2017.. Opportunities for cogeneration with nuclear energy. Nucl. Energy Ser. No. NP-T-4.1 , Int. Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna:. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/P1749_web.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 41.
    Sepulveda NA, Jennings JD, de Sisternes FJ, Lester RK. 2018.. The role of firm low-carbon electricity resources in deep decarbonization of power generation. . Joule 2::2403–20
     [Google Scholar]
  42. 42.
    Buongiorno J, Corradini M, Parsons J, Petti D. 2018.. The future of nuclear energy in a carbon-constrained world: an interdisciplinary MIT study. Res., Mass. Inst. Technol., Cambridge, MA:. https://energy.mit.edu/research/future-nuclear-energy-carbon-constrained-world/
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 43.
    R. Soc. 2020.. Nuclear cogeneration: civil nuclear energy in a low-carbon future. Policy Brief., Oct. , R. Soc., London:. https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/projects/nuclear-cogeneration/2020-10-7-nuclear-cogeneration-policy-briefing.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 44.
    ICEF. 2019.. Industrial heat decarbonization roadmap. Roadmap, ICEF, Bonn, Ger:. https://www.icef.go.jp/pdf/2019/roadmap/ICEF_Roadmap_201912.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 45.
    Revankar ST. 2019.. Nuclear hydrogen production. . In Storage and Hybridization of Nuclear Energy: Techno-Economic Integration of Renewable and Nuclear Energy, ed. H Bindra, ST Revankar , pp. 49–117 London:: Academic
     [Google Scholar]
  46. 46.
    Natl. Energy Agency. 2022.. The Role of Nuclear Power in the Hydrogen Economy: Cost and Competitiveness. Paris:: OECD Publ
     [Google Scholar]
  47. 47.
    Ding H, Wu W, Jiang C, Ding Y, Bian W, et al. 2020.. Self-sustainable protonic ceramic electrochemical cells using a triple conducting electrode for hydrogen and power production. . Nat. Commun. 11::1907
     [Google Scholar]
  48. 48.
    Iwatsuki J, Kunitomi K, Mineo H, Nishihara T, Sakaba N, et al. 2021.. Overview of high temperature gas-cooled reactor. . In High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors, ed. T Takeda, Y Inagaki , pp. 1–16 Amsterdam:: Elsevier
     [Google Scholar]
  49. 49.
    Locatelli G, Boarin S, Fiordaliso A, Ricotti ME. 2018.. Load following of small modular reactors (SMR) by cogeneration of hydrogen: a techno-economic analysis. . Energy 148::494–505
     [Google Scholar]
  50. 50.
    Zoback M, Smit D. 2023.. Meeting the challenges of large-scale carbon storage and hydrogen production. . PNAS 120::e2202397120
     [Google Scholar]
  51. 51.
    Oh E. 2021.. Responsibly sourced gas (RSG): a primer. . Wood Mackenzie, Oct. 18. https://www.woodmac.com/news/opinion/responsibly-sourced-gas-rsg-a-primer/
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 52.
    Int. Energy Agency. 2017.. Water-energy nexus. Technol. Rep., Int. Energy Agency, Paris:. https://www.iea.org/reports/water-energy-nexus
    [Google Scholar]
  53. 53.
    Yu L, Zhu Q, Song S, McElhenny B, Wang D, et al. 2019.. Non-noble metal-nitride based electrocatalysts for high-performance alkaline seawater electrolysis. . Nat. Commun. 10::5106
     [Google Scholar]
  54. 54.
    Buongiorno J, Carmichael B, Dunkin B, Parsons J, Smit D. 2021.. Can nuclear batteries be economically competitive in large markets?. Energies 14:(14):4385
     [Google Scholar]
  55. 55.
    Inst. Sustain. Process Technol. 2017.. Power to ammonia: feasibility study for the value chains and business cases to produce CO2-free ammonia suitable for various market applications. Rep. TESI115001 , Inst. Sustain. Process Technol., Amersfoort, Neth:. https://ispt.eu/media/DR-20-09-Power-to-Ammonia-2017-publication.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  56. 56.
    Randolph JB, Saar MO. 2011.. Combining geothermal energy capture with geologic carbon dioxide sequestration. . Geophys. Res. Lett. 38:(10):L10401
     [Google Scholar]
  57. 57.
    Lankof L, Urbańczyk K, Tarkowski R. 2022.. Assessment of the potential for underground hydrogen storage in salt domes. . Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 160::112309
     [Google Scholar]
  58. 58.
    Latham A, Wilson J, Gaylord B. 2022.. Energy super basins: where the renewable, CCS and upstream stars align. . Wood Mackensie Horizons, Aug. 11. https://www.woodmac.com/news/opinion/horizons-live-energy-super-basins/
    [Google Scholar]
  59. 59.
    Ruth M, Jadun P, Gilroy N, Connelly E, Boardman R, et al. 2020.. The technical and economic potential of the H2@Scale concept within the United States. Doc., NREL/TP- 6A20-77610 , Natl. Renew. Energy Lab., Golden, CO:. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/77610.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  60. 60.
    Farm Energy. 2019.. Corn for biofuel production. https://farm-energy.extension.org/corn-for-biofuel-production/
    [Google Scholar]
  61. 61.
    BloombergNEF. 2020.. Hydrogen economy outlook: key messages. Doc., BloombergNEF, New York:. https://data.bloomberglp.com/professional/sites/24/BNEF-Hydrogen-Economy-Outlook-Key-Messages-30-Mar-2020.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  62. 62.
    Ritchie H, Roser M. 2017.. A sense of units and scale for electrical energy production and consumption. . Our World in Data, Novemb. 22. https://ourworldindata.org/scale-for-electricity
    [Google Scholar]
  63. 63.
    MIT Energy Initiat. 2015.. The future of solar energy: an interdisciplinary MIT study. Rep. , MIT Energy Initiat., Cambridge, MA:. https://energy.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/MITEI-The-Future-of-Solar-Energy.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  64. 64.
    Lane J. 2012.. Cool planet. . Biofuels Digest, March 5. https://www.biofuelsdigest.com/bdigest/2012/03/05/ll-cool-planet-rocks-the-bells/
    [Google Scholar]
  65. 65.
    Derr E. 2022.. Nuclear needs small amounts of land to deliver big amounts of electricity. . NEI, April 29. https://www.nei.org/news/2022/nuclear-brings-more-electricity-with-less-land
    [Google Scholar]
  66. 66.
    Nicholas M. 2019.. Estimating electric vehicle charging infrastructure costs across major U.S. metropolitan areas. Work. Pap. 2019-14 , Int. Counc. Clean Transport., Washington, DC:. https://theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/ICCT_EV_Charging_Cost_20190813.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  67. 67.
    Saygin D, Gielen D. 2021.. Zero-emission pathway for the global chemical and petrochemical sector. . Energies 14:(13):3772
     [Google Scholar]
  68. 68.
    Natl. Grid. 2022.. Scope 1,2 and 3 emissions. https://www.nationalgrid.com/stories/energy-explained/what-are-scope-1-2-3-carbon-emissions
    [Google Scholar]
  69. 69.
    Int. Energy Agency. 2018.. The future of petrochemicals: towards a more sustainable chemical industry. Rep. , Int. Energy Agency, Paris:. https://www.iea.org/reports/the-future-of-petrochemicals
    [Google Scholar]
  70. 70.
    Soler A. 2019.. Role of e-fuels in the European transport system: literature review. Rep. 14/19 , Concawe, Brussels:. https://www.concawe.eu/wp-content/uploads/Rpt_19-14.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  71. 71.
    Forsberg C, Dale B, Jones D, Wendt L. 2022.. Can a nuclear-assisted biofuels system enable liquid biofuels as the economic low-carbon replacement for all liquid fossil fuels and hydrocarbon feedstocks and enable negative carbon emissions? Rep. NES-TR-023 , Cent. Adv. Nucl. Energy Syst., Mass. Inst. Technol., Cambridge, MA:
     [Google Scholar]
  72. 72.
    Enkvist P, Klevnäs P, Westerdahl R, Åhlén A. 2022.. How a ‘materials transition’ can support the net-zero agenda. . McKinsey Sustainability, July 20. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our-insights/how-a-materials-transition-can-support-the-net-zero-agenda
    [Google Scholar]
  73. 73.
    Sabat KC. 2019.. Iron production by hydrogen plasma. . J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1172::012043
     [Google Scholar]
  74. 74.
    Karakaya E, Nuur C, Assbring L. 2018.. Potential transitions in the iron and steel industry in Sweden: Towards a hydrogen-based future?. J. Clean. Prod. 195::651–63
     [Google Scholar]
  75. 75.
    Int. Energy Agency. 2022.. Iron and steel. Track. Rep. , Int. Energy Agency, Paris:. https://www.iea.org/reports/iron-and-steel
    [Google Scholar]
  76. 76.
    Migliaccio G, Des Roches R, Royer-Carfagni G. 2022.. Theoretical mechanical properties of strands and cables made of wound carbon nanotube fibers. . Int. J. Mech. Sci. 236::107706
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 77.
    Gogoi R, Maurya AK, Manik G. 2022.. A review on recent development in carbon fiber reinforced polyolefin composites. . Composites C 8::100279
     [Google Scholar]
  78. 78.
    Int. Energy Agency. 2022.. Cement. Rep. , Int. Energy Agency, Paris:. https://www.iea.org/reports/cement
    [Google Scholar]
  79. 79.
    Singh MS, O'Neill ME. 2022.. The climate system and the second law of thermodynamics. . Rev. Mod. Phys. 94:(1):015001
     [Google Scholar]
  80. 80.
    Kleidon A, Miller L, Gans F. 2015.. Physical limits of solar energy conversion in the Earth system. . In Solar Energy for Fuels, ed. H Tüysüz, CK Chan , pp. 1–22 Top. Curr. Chem. 371 . Cham, Switz:.: Springer Int. Publ
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-092220-030446
Loading
Role of International Oil Companies in the Net-Zero Emission Energy Transition
Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering 14, 301 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-092220-030446
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-092220-030446
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-092220-030446
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error