1932

Abstract

Between 1980 and 2007, probation rates in the United States skyrocketed alongside imprisonment rates; since 2007, both forms of criminal justice control have declined in use. Although a large literature in criminology and related fields has explored the causes and consequences of mass incarceration, very little research has explored the parallel rise of mass probation. This review takes stock of our knowledge of probation in the United States. In the first section, I trace the expansion of probation historically, across states, and for specific demographic groups. I then summarize the characteristics of adults on probation today and what we know about probation revocation. Lastly, I review the nascent literature on the causal effects of probation for individuals, families, neighborhoods, and society. I end by discussing a plan for research and the growing movement to blunt the harms of mass supervision.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011419-041352
2020-01-13
2024-04-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/criminol/3/1/annurev-criminol-011419-041352.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011419-041352&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Aebi MF, Delgrande N, Marguet Y 2015. Have community sanctions and measures widened the net of the European criminal justice systems?. Punishm. Soc. 17:5575–97
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Albonetti CA, Hepburn JR. 1997. Probation revocation: a proportional hazards model of the conditioning effects of social disadvantage. Soc. Probl. 44:1124–38
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alexander M. 2010. The New Jim Crow: Mass Imprisonment in the Age of Colorblindness New York: New Press
  4. Alper M, Corda A, Reitz KR 2016. American Exceptionalism in Probation Supervision Minneapolis, MN: Robina Inst. Crim. Law Crim. Justice
  5. Apel R. 2016. The effects of jail and prison confinement on cohabitation and marriage. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 665:103–26
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Austin J. 2016. Regulating California's prison population: the use of sticks and carrots. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 664:84–107
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Beckett K. 2018. The politics, promise, and peril of criminal justice reform in the context of mass incarceration. Annu. Rev. Criminol. 1:235–59
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bonczar TP, Mulako-Wangota J. 2019. Supervision rate of total probation population Corrections Statistical Analysis Tool (CSAT)—Probation, Bur. Justice Stat Washington, DC: retrieved July 19, 2019. https://www.bjs.gov/probation/
  9. Bonta J, Rugge T, Scott TL, Bourgon GUY, Yessine AK 2008. Exploring the black box of community supervision. J. Offender Rehabil. 47:3248–70
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Brayne S. 2014. Surveillance and system avoidance: criminal justice contact and institutional attachment. Am. Soc. Rev. 79:3367–91
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Brennan Cent. Justice 2010. Criminal Justice Debt: A Barrier to Reentry New York: Brennan Cent. Justice
  12. Burch TR. 2014. Effects of imprisonment and community supervision on neighborhood political participation in North Carolina. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 651:184–201
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bur. Justice Stat 2019. Key statistic: total correctional population. Bureau of Justice Statistics https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=kfdetail&iid=487
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Campbell MC. 2018. Varieties of mass incarceration: what we learn from state histories. Annu. Rev. Criminol. 1:219–34
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Carson EA, Mulako-Wangota J. 2019. Imprisonment rates of jurisdiction population: sentences greater than 1 year Corrections Statistical Analysis Tool (CSAT)—Prisoners, Bur. Justice Stat. Washington, DC: retrieved July 19, 2019. https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=nps
  16. Cent. Behav. Health Stat. Qual 2012. National survey on drug use and health, 2012 Subst. Abuse Ment. Health Serv. Adm. Rep. NSDUH-2012-DS0001, US Dep. Health Hum. Serv. Rockville, MD:
  17. Cent. Behav. Health Stat. Qual 2018a. National survey on drug use and health, 2016 Subst. Abuse Ment. Health Serv. Adm. Rep. NSDUH-2016-DS0001, US Dep. Health Hum. Serv Rockville, MD:
  18. Cent. Behav. Health Stat. Qual 2018b. National survey on drug use and health, 2017 Subst. Abuse Ment. Health Serv. Adm. Rep. NSDUH-2017-DS0001, US Dep. Health Hum. Serv Rockville, MD:
  19. Chiricos T, Barrick K, Bales W, Bontrager S 2007. The labeling of convicted felons and its consequences for recidivism. Criminology 45:3547–81
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Clear TR. 2007. Imprisoning Communities: How Mass Incarceration Makes Disadvantaged Neighborhoods Worse Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  21. Clear TR, Latessa EJ. 1993. Probation officer roles in intensive supervision: surveillance versus treatment. Justice Q 10:441–61
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Cohen S. 1985. Visions of Social Control: Crime, Punishment and Classification Cambridge, UK: Polity Press
  23. Columbia Justice Lab 2018. Too Big to Succeed: The Impact of the Growth of Community Corrections and What Should Be Done About It New York: Columbia Justice Lab
  24. Comfort M. 2008. Doing Time Together: Love and Family in the Shadow of the Prison Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  25. Comfort M. 2016. A twenty-hour-a-day job: the impact of frequent low-level criminal justice involvement on family life. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 665:163–79
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Cox A. 2018. Trapped in a Vice: The Consequences of Confinement for Young People Camden, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press
  27. CSG Justice Cent 2019. Confined and costly: how supervision violations are filling prisons and burdening budgets Rep., Counc. State Gov. New York:
  28. Davis E, Whyde A, Langton L 2018. Contacts between police and the public, 2015 Bur. Justice Stat. Rep. NCJ251145, US Dep. Justice Washington, DC:
  29. DeMichele M. 2014. Studying the community corrections field: applying neo-institutional theories to a hidden element of mass social control. Theor. Criminol. 18:4546–64
    [Google Scholar]
  30. DeMichele MT. 2007. Probation and parole's growing caseloads and workload allocation: strategies for managerial decision making Rep., Am. Probat. Parole Assoc Lexington, KY:
  31. Doherty F. 2016. Obey all laws and be good: probation and the meaning of recidivism. Georget. Law J. 104:291–354
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Doleac JL. 2018. Strategies to productively reincorporate the formerly-incarcerated into communities: a review of the literature SSRN Work. Pap. 3198112. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3198112
  33. Durnescu I, McNeill F, Butter R 2016. Probation: 12 Essential Questions London: Palgrave Macmillan
  34. Durose MR, Langan PA. 2005. State court sentencing of convicted felons, 2002 Bur. Justice Stat. Rep. NCJ208910, US Dep. Justice Washington, DC:
  35. Fader JJ. 2013. Falling Back: Incarceration and Transitions to Adulthood among Urban Youth New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press
  36. Feeley MM, Simon J. 1992. The new penology: notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology 30:4449–74
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Finkel M. 2019. New data: low incomes–but high fees–for people on probation Rep., Prison Policy Initiat. Northampton, MA: https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2019/04/09/probation_income/
  38. Garland D. 2001. Introduction: the meaning of mass imprisonment. Punishm. Soc. 3:15–7
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Glaze L, Bonczar T. 2009. Adults on probation in the United States, 1977–2008 Bur. Justice Stat. Rep., US Dep. Justice Washington, DC:
  40. Grattet R, Petersilia J, Lin J, Beckman L 2009. Parole violations and revocations in California: analysis and suggestions for action. Fed. Probat. 73:2–11
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Green DP, Winik D. 2010. Using random judge assignments to estimate the effects of incarceration and probation on recidivism among drug offenders. Criminology 48:2357–87
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Harding DJ, Morenoff JD, Herbert CW 2013. Home is hard to find neighborhoods, institutions, and the residential trajectories of returning prisoners. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 647:1214–36
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Harding DJ, Morenoff JD, Nguyen AP, Bushway SD 2017a. Short- and long-term effects of imprisonment on future felony convictions and prison admissions. PNAS 114:4211103–8
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Harding DJ, Morenoff JD, Wyse JJB 2018. On the Outside: Prisoner Reentry and Reintegration Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  45. Harding DJ, Siegel JA, Morenoff JD 2017b. Custodial parole sanctions and earnings after release from prison. Soc. Forces 96:2909–34
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Harris A. 2016. A Pound of Flesh: Monetary Sanctions as Punishment for the Poor New York: Russell Sage Found
  47. Hipp JR, Petersilia J, Turner S 2010. Parolee recidivism in California: the effect of neighborhood context and social service agency characteristics. Criminology 48:4947–79
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Jacobs JB. 2015. The Eternal Criminal Record Cambridge, MA: Harv. Univ. Press
  49. Jacobson MP, Schiraldi V, Daly R, Hotez E 2017. Less is more: how reducing probation populations can improve outcomes Rep., Executive Session Community Correct. Harv. Kennedy School Boston, MA:
  50. Kaeble D, Cowhig M. 2018. Correctional populations in the United States, 2016 Bur. Justice Stat. Rep. NCJ251148, US Dep. Justice Washington, DC:
  51. Kaeble D, Maruschak L, Bonczar T 2017. Probation and parole in the United States, 2014 Bur. Justice Stat. Rep. NCJ249057, US Dep. Justice Washington, DC:
  52. Kirk DS, Wakefield S. 2018. Collateral consequences of punishment: a critical review and path forward. Annu. Rev. Criminol. 1:171–94
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Klingele C. 2013. Rethinking the use of community. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 103:41015–70
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Knapp CD, Howell BA, Wang EA, Shlafer RJ, Hardeman RR, Winkelman TNA 2019. Health insurance gains after implementation of the Affordable Care Act Among individuals recently on probation: USA, 2008–2016. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 34:71086–88
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Kohler-Hausmann I. 2018. Misdemeanorland: Criminal Courts and Social Control in an Age of Broken Windows Policing Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press
  56. Kohler-Hausmann I. 2019. Eddie Murphy and the dangers of counterfactual causal thinking about detecting racial discrimination SSRN Work. Pap. 3050650 https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3050650
  57. Kurlychek MC, Johnson BD. 2019. Cumulative disadvantage in the American criminal justice system. Annu. Rev. Criminol. 2:291–319
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Latessa E, Lowenkamp C. 2006. What works in reducing recidivism. Univ. St. Thomas Law J. 3:3521–35
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Lauritsen JL, Rezey ML, Heimer K 2016. When choice of data matters: analyses of U.S. crime trends, 1973–2012. J. Quant. Criminol. 32:3335–55
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Lerman AE, Weaver VM. 2014. Arresting Citizenship: The Democratic Consequences of American Crime Control Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  61. Leverentz AM. 2014. The Ex-Prisoner's Dilemma: How Women Negotiate Competing Narratives of Reentry and Desistance New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press
  62. Loeffler CE. 2013. Does imprisonment alter the life course? Evidence on crime and employment from a natural experiment. Criminology 51:1137–66
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Lowenkamp CT, Flores AW, Holsinger AM, Makarios MD, Latessa EJ 2010. Intensive supervision programs: Does program philosophy and the principles of effective intervention matter. J. Crim. Justice 38:4368–75
    [Google Scholar]
  64. MacKenzie DL, Browing K, Skroban SB, Smith DA 1999. The impact of probation on the criminal activities of offenders. J. Res. Crime Delinquency 36:4423–53
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Manza J, Uggen C. 2008. Locked Out: Felon Disenfranchisement and American Democracy New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  66. May DC, Wood PB, Eades A 2008. Lessons learned from punishment exchange rates: implications for theory, research, and correctional policy. J. Behav. Anal. Offender Vict. Treat. Prev. 1:2187–201
    [Google Scholar]
  67. McKim A. 2017. Addicted to Rehab: Race, Gender, and Drugs in the Era of Mass Incarceration New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press
  68. McNeill F. 2018. Mass supervision, misrecognition and the “Malopticon.”. Punishm. Soc. 21:2207–30
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Miller RJ. 2014. Devolving the carceral state: race, prisoner reentry, and the micro-politics of urban poverty management. Punishm. Soc. 16:305–35
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Morash M, Kashy DA, Smith SW, Cobbina JE 2017. Technical violations, treatment and punishment responses, and recidivism of women on probation and parole. Crim. Justice Policy Rev. 30:5788–810
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Natapoff A. 2018. Punishment Without Crime: How Our Massive Misdemeanor System Traps the Innocent and Makes America More Unequal New York: Basic Books
  72. Natl. Res. Counc. (NRC) 2014. The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
  73. Olson DE. 2019. Probation revocation. Oxford Research Encyclopedias: Criminology and Criminal Justice, ed. HN Pontell Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Owens ML, Walker HL. 2018. The civic voluntarism of “custodial citizens”: involuntary criminal justice contact, associational life, and political participation. Perspect. Politics 16:4990–1013
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Pager D. 2007. Marked: Race, Crime, and Finding Work in an Era of Mass Incarceration Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  76. Petersilia J, Turner S. 1993. Intensive probation and parole. Crime Justice 17:281–35
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Pettit B. 2012. Invisible Men: Mass Incarceration and the Myth of Black Progress New York: Russell Sage Found
  78. Pfaff J. 2017. Locked In: The True Causes of Mass Incarceration and How to Achieve Real Reform New York: Basic Books
  79. Phelps MS. 2013. The paradox of probation: community supervision in the age of mass incarceration. Law Policy 35:1–251–80
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Phelps MS. 2016. Possibilities and contestation in twenty-first-century US criminal justice downsizing. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 12:153–70
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Phelps MS. 2017. Mass probation: toward a more robust theory of state variation in punishment. Punishm. Soc. 19:153–73
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Phelps MS. 2018. Mass probation and inequality: race, class, and gender disparities in supervision and revocation. Handbook on Punishment Decisions: Locations of Disparity JT Ulmer, MS Bradley 43–65 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Phelps MS, Ruhland E. 2019. Governing marginality: coercion and care in probation supervision Paper presented at the 2019 Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association Washington, DC: May 31
  84. Raphael S, Stoll MA. 2013. Why Are So Many Americans in Prison? New York: Russell Sage Found
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Reitz KR, Rhine EE. 2020. Parole release and supervision: critical drivers of American prison policy. Annu. Rev. Criminol. 3:281–98
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Remster B, Kramer R. 2018. Race, space, and surveillance: understanding the relationship between criminal justice contact and institutional involvement. Socius https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118761434
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  87. Rios VM. 2011. Punished: Policing the lives of Black and Latino Boys New York: NYU Press
  88. Rios VM. 2017. Human Targets: Schools, Police, and the Criminalization of Latino Youth Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  89. Schoenfeld H. 2016. A research agenda on reform: penal policy and politics across the states. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 664:1155–74
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Spohn C. 2015. Race, crime, and punishment in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Crime Justice 44:149–97
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Shaffer DK. 2011. Looking inside the black box of drug courts: a meta-analytic review. Justice Q. 28:3493–521
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Sissoko DRG, Goshin LS. 2019. Mothering under community criminal justice supervision in the United States. The Palgrave Handbook of Prison and the Family M Hutton, D Moran 431–55 London: Palgrave Macmillan
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Skeem JL, Manchak S. 2008. Back to the future: from Klockars’ model of effective supervision to evidence-based practice in probation. J. Offender Rehabil. 47:3220–47
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Skeem JL, Manchak S, Peterson JK 2011. Correctional policy for offenders with mental illness: creating a new paradigm for recidivism reduction. Law Hum. Behav. 35:2110–26
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Sykes BL, Pettit B. 2014. Mass incarceration, family complexity, and the reproduction of childhood disadvantage. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 654:1127–49
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Taxman FS. 2012. Probation, intermediate sanctions, and community-based corrections. The Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections J Petersilia, KR Reitz 363–85 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Turney K, Conner E. 2019. Jail incarceration: a common and consequential form of criminal justice contact. Annu. Rev. Criminol. 2:265–90
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Vaughn MG, DeLisi M, Beaver KM, Perron BE, Abdon A 2012. Toward a criminal justice epidemiology: behavioral and physical health of probationers and parolees in the United States. J. Crim. Justice 40:3165–73
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Wacquant L. 2000. The new “peculiar institution”: on the prison as surrogate ghetto. Theor. Criminol 4:3377–89
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Wakefield S, Wildeman C. 2013. Children of the Prison Boom: Mass Incarceration and the Future of American Inequality Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  101. Welsh M. 2019. How formerly incarcerated women confront the limits of caring and the burdens of control amid California's carceral realignment. Fem. Criminol. 14:189–114
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Werth R. 2012. I do what I'm told, sort of: reformed subjects, unruly citizens, and parole. Theor. Criminol. 16:329–46
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Western B. 2006. Punishment and Inequality in America New York: Russell Sage Found
  104. Western B. 2018. Homeward: Life in the Year After Prison New York: Russell Sage Found
  105. Western B, Muller C. 2013. Mass incarceration, macrosociology, and the poor. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 647:166–89
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Winkelman TNA, Phelps MS, Mitchell K, Jennings L, Shlafer RJ 2020. Physical health and disability among adults on community supervision in the United States. J. Corr. Health Care. In press
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011419-041352
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011419-041352
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error