1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Environment and Resources
  4. Volume 39, 2014
  5. Article

Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Volume 39, 2014

Consensus and Contention in the Food-Versus-Fuel Debate

Abstract

This review discusses research on linkages between biofuels, agriculture, and food security. The literature indicates that biofuel expansion affects land use, puts pressure on food and feed markets, and modestly reduces greenhouse gas emissions. Researchers readily identify these outcomes, as well as the multitude of factors besides biofuels that have driven up food prices in recent years. However, precision in quantifying the extent of the impacts and in attributing effects to various drivers is elusive, resulting in a wide range of estimates. Nevertheless, the central tendency is that a food-versus-fuel trade-off is created through biofuel production from food crops, and the continued expansion of biofuel production increases food commodity prices, reduces the availability of calories, and increases malnourishment in developing countries. Higher food prices particularly reduce the poor's access to food, which has possible long-term, irreversible consequences for health, productivity, and well-being.

Keyword(s): agriculture, biofuel, European Union, food security, United States
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-031813-132233
2014-10-17
2024-10-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/energy/39/1/annurev-environ-031813-132233.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-031813-132233&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1. HLPE 2013. Biofuels and food security HLPE Rep. No. 5, High Level Panel Experts Food Secur. Nutr., Comm. World Food Secur., Rome. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/hlpe/hlpe_documents/HLPE_Reports/HLPE-Report-5_Biofuels_and_food_security.pdf [Google Scholar]
  2. Diop D, Blanco M, Flammini A, Schlaifer M, Kropiwnicka MA, Markhof MM. 2.  2013. Assessing the impact of biofuels production on developing countries from the point of view of policy coherence for development Final Rep., AETS Consort., Feb., Eur. Union Framew. Contract Comm., Contract No. 2012/299193, Brussels [Google Scholar]
  3. Oladosu G, Msangi S. 3.  2013. Biofuel-food market interactions: a review of modeling approaches and findings. Agriculture 3:53–71 [Google Scholar]
  4. Condon N, Klemick H, Wolverton A. 4.  2013. Impacts of ethanol policy on corn prices: a review and meta-analysis of recent evidence Presented at Jt. Annu. Meet. AAEA & CAES, Aug. 4–6, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  5. Chakravorty U, Hubert MH, Nostbakken L. 5.  2009. Fuel versus food. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 1:645–63 [Google Scholar]
  6. Babcock BA. 6.  2007. High crop prices, ethanol mandates, and the public good: Do they coexist?. Iowa Agric. Rev. 13:21–12 [Google Scholar]
  7. Sperling D, Yeh S. 7.  2009. Low carbon fuel standards. Issues Sci. Technol. 25:257–66 [Google Scholar]
  8. Sperling D, Yeh S. 8.  2010. Toward a global low carbon fuel standard. Transport Policy 17:47–49 [Google Scholar]
  9. Tyner WE. 9.  2010. Comparison of the US and EU approaches to stimulating biofuels. Biofuels 1:119–21 [Google Scholar]
  10. Mitchell D. 10.  2011. Biofuels in Africa: Opportunities, Prospects and Challenges Washington, DC: World Bank [Google Scholar]
  11. Hazell PBR, Evans M. 11.  2011. Environmental economic and policy aspects of biofuels. Handbook of Sustainable Energy I Galarraga, M González-Eguion, A Markandya 375–92 Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar [Google Scholar]
  12. Msangi S, Evans M. 12.  2013. Biofuels and developing economies: Is the timing right?. Agric. Econ. 44:501–10 [Google Scholar]
  13. Piesse J, Thirtle C. 13.  2009. Three bubbles and a panic: an explanatory review of recent food commodity price events. Food Policy 34:119–29 [Google Scholar]
  14. Trostle R. 14.  2008. Global agricultural supply and demand: factors contributing to the recent increase in food commodity prices Outlook Rep. No. WRS-0801, Econ. Res. Serv., US Dep. Agric., Washington, DC. http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/wrs-international-agriculture-and-trade-outlook/wrs-0801.aspx#.U8k365RdWSo [Google Scholar]
  15. Trostle R, Marti D, Rosen S, Westcott P. 15.  2011. Why have food commodity prices risen again? Outlook Rep. No. WRS-1103, Econ. Res. Serv., US Dep. Agric., Washington, DC. http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/wrs-international-agriculture-and-trade-outlook/wrs1103.aspx#.U8k5upRdWSo [Google Scholar]
  16. 16. Off. Chief Econ., Agric. Mark. Serv., Farm Serv. Agency, Econ. Res. Serv., Foreign Agric. Serv 2011. World agricultural supply and demand estimates Mon. Rep., May 11, US Dep. Agric., World Agric. Outlook Board, Washington, DC. http://usda01.library.cornell.edu/usda/waob/wasde//2010s/2011/wasde-05-11-2011.pdf [Google Scholar]
  17. Rosegrant MW, Tokgoz S, Bhandary P. 17.  2013. The future of the global food economy. Food Security and Sociopolitical Stability CB Barrett 35–63 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  18. Mitchell D. 18.  2008. A note on rising food prices Policy Res. Work. Pap. 4682, World Bank, Washington, DC. http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/2008/07/28/000020439_20080728103002/Rendered/PDF/WP4682.pdf [Google Scholar]
  19. Rosegrant MW, Zhu T, Msangi S, Sulser T. 19.  2008. Global scenarios for biofuels: impacts and implications. Rev. Agric. Econ. 30:3495–505 [Google Scholar]
  20. Abbott P, Hurt C, Tyner W. 20.  2008. What's driving food prices? Issue Rep., July, Farm Found., Oakbrook, IL. http://www.farmfoundation.org/webcontent/Farm-Foundation-Issue-Report-Whats-Driving-Food-Prices-404.aspx
  21. Elliott K. 21.  2008. Biofuels and the food price crisis: a survey of the issues Work. Pap. No. 151, Cent. Glob. Dev., Washington, DC. http://www.cgdev.org/files/16499_file_Elliott_Biofuels_Food_Crisis.pdf [Google Scholar]
  22. Mittal A. 22.  2009. The blame game. The Global Food Crisis J Clapp, M Cohen 13–28 Waterloo, Can.: Cent. Int. Gov. Innov./Wilfrid Laurier Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  23. Headey D, Malaiyandi S, Fan S. 23.  2009. Navigating the perfect storm—reflections on the food, energy, and financial crisis IFPRI Discuss. Pap. 00889, Int. Food Policy Res. Inst., Washington, DC. http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/ifpridp00889.pdf [Google Scholar]
  24. Headey D, Fan S. 24.  2010. Reflections on the global food crisis—how did it happen? How has it hurt? And how can we prevent the next one? IFPRI Res. Monogr. 165, Int. Food Policy Res. Inst., Washington, DC. http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/rr165.pdf [Google Scholar]
  25. von Braun J, Torero M. 25.  2009. Exploring the price spike. Choices 24:116–21 http://www.choicesmagazine.org/magazine/pdf/article_58.pdf [Google Scholar]
  26. Rapsomanikis G, Sarris A. 26.  2010. Commodity Market Review Rome: Food Agric. Org. United Nations http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/i1545e/i1545e00.pdf [Google Scholar]
  27. Al-Riffai P, Dimaranan B, Laborde D. 27.  2010. Global trade and environmental impact study of the EU biofuels mandate. Final Rep., ATLASS Consort., Int. Food Policy Res. Inst., Dir. Gen. Trade Eur. Comm., Washington, DC/Brussels. http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/biofuelsreportec.pdf
  28. Schmidhuber J. 28.  2006. Impact of an increased biomass use on agricultural markets, prices and food security: a longer-term perspective. Presented at Int. Symp. Notre Eur., Nov. 27–29, Paris [Google Scholar]
  29. Hochman G, Rajagopal D, Timilsina G, Zilberman D. 29.  2011. The role of inventory adjustments in quantifying factors causing food price inflation Policy Res. Work. Pap. 5744, World Bank, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  30. Durham C, Davies G, Bhattacharyya T. 30.  2012. Can biofuels policy work for food security? An analytical paper for discussion Res. Pap., Dep. Environ. Food Rural Aff., London. http://www.gov.uk/government/publications/can-biofuels-policy-work-for-food-security [Google Scholar]
  31. Babcock BA. 31.  2011. The impact of US biofuel policies on agricultural price levels and volatility Issue Pap. No. 35, ICTSD Prog. Agric. Trade Sustain. Dev., Int. Cent. Trade Sustain. Dev., Geneva [Google Scholar]
  32. Chen X, Khanna M. 32.  2013. Food versus fuel: the effect of biofuel policies. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 95:2289–95 [Google Scholar]
  33. Mosnier A, Havlik P, Valin H, Baker JS, Murray BC. 33.  et al. 2012. The net global effects of alternative U.S. biofuel mandates: fossil fuel displacement, indirect land use change, and the role of agricultural productivity growth. Rep. NI R 12-01, Nicholas Inst. Environ. Policy Solut., Duke Univ., Durham, NC [Google Scholar]
  34. de Gorter H, Drabik D, Just DR. 34.  2013. Biofuel policies and food grain commodity prices 2006–2012: all boom and no bust?. Agbioforum 16:11–13 [Google Scholar]
  35. Roberts MJ, Schlenker W. 35.  2010. Identifying supply and demand elasticities of agricultural commodities: implications for the US ethanol mandate NBER Work. Pap. 15921, Natl. Bur. Econ. Res., Cambridge, MA [Google Scholar]
  36. Timilsina GR, Beghin JC, van der Mensbrugghe D, Mevel S. 36.  2012. The impacts of biofuels targets on land-use change and food supply: a global CGE assessment. Agric. Econ. 43:315–32 [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhang W, Yu E, Rozelle S, Yang J, Msangi S. 37.  2013. The impact of biofuel growth on agriculture: Why is the range of estimates so wide?. Food Policy 38:227–39 [Google Scholar]
  38. Zilberman D, Hochman G, Rajagopal D, Sexton S, Timilsina G. 38.  2013. The impact of biofuels on commodity food prices: assessment of findings. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 95:2275–81 [Google Scholar]
  39. Nelson GC, Valin H, Sands RD, Havlik P, Ahammad H. 39.  et al. 2014. Climate change effects on agriculture: economic responses to biophysical shocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111:3274–79 [Google Scholar]
  40. Edwards R, Mulligan D, Marelli L. 40.  2010. Indirect land use change from increased biofuels demand: comparison of models and results for marginal biofuels production from different feedstocks. JRC Sci. Tech. Rep., EUR 24485 EN, JRC, Eur. Comm., Inst. Energy, Luxembourg [Google Scholar]
  41. Tokgoz S, Zhang W, Msangi S, Bhandary P. 41.  2012. Biofuels and the future of food: competition and complementarities. Agriculture 2:414–35 [Google Scholar]
  42. de Jongh J, Nielsen F. 42.  2011. Lessons learned: Jatropha for local development. Rep., FACT Found., Wageningen, Neth. http://www.jatropha.pro/PDF%20bestanden/2011-12_Jatropha_Lessons_Learned_final.pdf [Google Scholar]
  43. Oladosu G, Kline K, Uria-Martinez R, Eaton L. 43.  2011. Sources of corn for ethanol production in the United States: a decomposition analysis of the empirical data. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref. 5:640–53 [Google Scholar]
  44. Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong F, Elobeid A. 44.  et al. 2008. Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319:1238–40 [Google Scholar]
  45. Havlik P, Schneider UA, Schmid E, Bottcher H, Fritz S. 45.  et al. 2011. Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets. Energy Policy 39:105690–702 [Google Scholar]
  46. Tyner WE, Taheripour F, Zhuang Q, Birur D, Baldos U. 46.  2010. Land use changes and consequent CO2 emissions due to US corn ethanol production: a comprehensive analysis Final Rep., GTAP Resour. No. 3288, Dep. Agric. Econ., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN. http://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/5200.pdf [Google Scholar]
  47. Dumortier J, Hayes DJ, Carriquiry M, Dong F, Du X. 47.  et al. 2011. Sensitivity of carbon emission estimates from indirect land-use change. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 33:3428–48 [Google Scholar]
  48. 48. CARB 2009. Proposed regulation to implement the low carbon fuel standard, Vol. II Staff Rep., Initial Statement of Reasons, Calif. Air Resour. Board, Sacramento, CA [Google Scholar]
  49. 49. USEPA 2010. Renewable Fuel Standard Program (RFS2): Regulatory Impact Analysis. Washington, DC: US Environ. Prot. Agency [Google Scholar]
  50. Dumortier J, Hayes DJ, Carriquiry M, Dong F, Du X. 50.  et al. 2009. Sensitivity of Carbon Emission Estimates from Indirect Land-Use Change. Ames, IA: Cent. Agric. Rural Dev., Iowa State Univ. [Google Scholar]
  51. Plevin RJ, O'Hare M, Jones AD, Torn MS, Gibbs HK. 51.  2010. Greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels: Indirect land use changes are uncertain but may be much greater than previously estimated. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44:218015–21 [Google Scholar]
  52. 52. US Gov. Account. Off 2009. Biofuels: potential effects and challenges of required increases in production and use. Rep. GAO-09-446, Washington, DC 184 http://www.gao.gov/assets/160/157718.pdf [Google Scholar]
  53. Plevin RJ, Kammen DM. 53.  2013. Indirect land use and greenhouse gas impacts of biofuels. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity 4 SA Levin 293–97 Waltham, MA: Academic, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  54. Khanna M, Crago CL. 54.  2012. Measuring indirect land use change with biofuels: implications for policy. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 4:161–84 [Google Scholar]
  55. Hertel TW, Golub AA, Jones AD, O'Hare M, Plevin RJ, Kammen DM. 55.  2010. Effects of U.S. maize ethanol on global land use and greenhouse gas emissions: estimating market-mediated responses. Bioscience 60:3223–31 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-031813-132233
Loading
Consensus and Contention in the Food-Versus-Fuel Debate
Annual Review of Environment and Resources 39, 271 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-031813-132233
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-031813-132233
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-031813-132233
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error