1932

Abstract

Illegal wildlife trade (IWT) has increased in profile in recent years as a global policy issue, largely because of its association with declines in prominent internationally trafficked species. In this review, we explore the scale of IWT, associated threats to biodiversity, and appropriate responses to these threats. We discuss the historical development of IWT research and highlight the uncertainties that plague the evidence base, emphasizing the need for more systematic approaches to addressing evidence gaps in a way that minimizes the risk of unethical or counterproductive outcomes for wildlife and people. We highlight the need for evaluating interventions in order to learn, and the importance of sharing datasets and lessons learned. A more collaborative approach to linking IWT research, practice, and policy would better align public policy discourse and action with research evidence. This in turn would enable more effective policy making that contributes to reducing the threat to biodiversity that IWT represents.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033253
2019-10-17
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/energy/44/1/annurev-environ-101718-033253.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033253&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1. 
    Hughes JD. 2003. Europe as consumer of exotic biodiversity: Greek and Roman times. Landscape Res 28:21–31
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2. 
    van Uhm DP. 2016. The Illegal Wildlife Trade: Inside the World of Poachers, Smugglers and Traders Cham, Switz.: Springer Int. Publ.
  3. 3. 
    Milner-Gulland EJ. 2018. Documenting and tackling the illegal wildlife trade: change and continuity over 40 years. Oryx 52:597–98
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 4. 
    Warchol GL. 2004. The transnational illegal wildlife trade. Crim. Justice Stud. 17:57–73
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 5. 
    Nijman V. 2010. An overview of international wildlife trade from Southeast Asia. Biodiversity Conserv 19:1101–14
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 6. 
    Beastall C, Shepherd CR, Hadiprakarsa Y, Martyr D 2016. Trade in the Helmeted Hornbill Rhinoplax vigil: the ‘ivory hornbill’. Bird Conserv. Int. 26:137–46
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 7. 
    United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) 2016. World Wildlife Crime Report: Trafficking in Protected Species New York: United Nations
  8. 8. 
    Broad S, Mulliken T, Roe D 2003. The nature and extent of legal and illegal trade in wildlife. The Trade in Wildlife: Regulation for Conservation S Oldfield 3–22 London: Earthscan
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 9. 
    Cooney R, Kasterine A, MacMillan D, Milledge S, Nossal K et al. 2015. The Trade in Wildlife: A Framework to Improve Biodiversity and Livelihood Outcomes Geneva: Int. Trade Cent.
  10. 10. 
    Hutton J, Dickson B, eds. 2000. Endangered Species, Threatened Convention: The Past, Present and Future of CITES, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora London: Earthscan
  11. 11. 
    Weber DS, Mandler T, Dyck M, Van Coeverden De Groot PJ, Lee DS, Clark DA 2015. Unexpected and undesired conservation outcomes of wildlife trade bans—An emerging problem for stakeholders. ? Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 3:389–400
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 12. 
    ‘t Sas-Rolfes M. 2000. Assessing CITES: four case studies. Endangered Species, Threatened Convention: The Past, Present and Future of CITES, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora J Hutton, B Dickson 69–87 London: Earthscan
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 13. 
    Trouwborst A, Lewis M, Burnham D, Dickman A, Hinks A et al. 2017. International law and lions (Panthera leo): understanding and improving the contribution of wildlife treaties to the conservation and sustainable use of an iconic carnivore. Nat. Conserv. 21:83–128
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 14. 
    Dutton AJ, Gratwicke B, Hepburn C, Herrera EA, Macdonald DW 2013. Tackling unsustainable wildlife trade. Key Topics in Conservation Biology 274–91 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 15. 
    Fischer C. 2010. Does trade help or hinder the conservation of natural resources?. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 4:103–21
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 16. 
    Felbab-Brown V. 2017. The Extinction Market: Wildlife Trafficking and How to Counter It London: Hurst
  17. 17. 
    Bowman M, Davies P, Redgwell C 2010. Lyster's International Wildlife Law Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  18. 18. 
    Wandesforde-Smith G. 2016. Looking for law in all the wrong places? Dying elephants, evolving treaties, and empty threats. J. Int. Wildlife Law Policy 19:365–81
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 19. 
    Kurland J, Pires SF, McFann SC, Moreto WD 2017. Wildlife crime: a conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. Crime Sci 6:4
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 20. 
    Sand PH. 1997. Commodity or taboo? International regulation of trade in endangered species. Green Globe Yearbook of International Co-operation on Environment and Development: An Independent Publication on Environment and Development Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 21. 
    Reeve R. 2002. Policing International Trade in Endangered Species: The CITES Treaty and Compliance London: Earthscan
  22. 22. 
    Oldfield S 2003. The Trade in Wildlife: Regulation for Conservation London: Earthscan
  23. 23. 
    Hinsley A, Roberts DL. 2018. The wild origin dilemma. Biol. Conserv. 217:203–6
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 24. 
    North DC. 1991. Institutions. J. Econ. Perspect. 5:97–112
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 25. 
    Elliott L. 2012. Legality and legitimacy: the environmental challenge. Legality and Legitimacy in Global Affairs R Falk, M Juergensmayer, V Popovski 365–87 Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 26. 
    Beckert J, Dewey M, eds. 2017. The Architecture of Illegal Markets: Towards an Economic Sociology of Illegality in the Economy Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  27. 27. 
    Underwood FM, Burn RW, Milliken T 2013. Dissecting the illegal ivory trade: an analysis of ivory seizures data. PLOS ONE 8:e76539
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 28. 
    Symes WS, McGrath FL, Rao M, Carrasco LR 2018. The gravity of wildlife trade. Biol. Conserv. 218:268–76
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 29. 
    United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) 1998. Policy Effectiveness and Multilateral Environmental Agreements: Environment and Trade Series Geneva: UNEP
  30. 30. 
    US Government Interagency Working Group 2000. International Crime Threat Assessment Washington, DC: US Gov.
  31. 31. 
    US Department of State 2005. Announcing the Formation of the Coalition Against Wildlife Trafficking. Bureau of Oceans and International Environment and Scientific Affairs Washington, DC: US. Dep. State. https://2001-2009.state.gov/g/oes/rls/or/53746.htm
  32. 32. 
    Lawson S. 2007. International Environmental Crime: Data Collection, Transparency and Auditing. The Growth and Control of International Environmental Crime London: Chatham House
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 33. 
    Alacs E, Georges A. 2008. Wildlife across our borders: a review of the illegal trade in Australia. Austr. J. Forensic Sci. 40:147–60
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 34. 
    Haken J. 2011. Transnational crime in the developing world Rep., Glob. Financ. Integr. Washington, DC: https://gfintegrity.org/report/briefing-paper-transnational-crime/
  35. 35. 
    Pietschmann T, Walker J. 2011. Estimating illicit financial flows resulting from drug trafficking and other transnational organized crimes Rep., UN Off. Drugs Crime Vienna: https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/Studies/Illicit_financial_flows_2011_web.pdf
  36. 36. 
    South N, Wyatt T. 2011. Comparing illicit trades in wildlife and drugs: an exploratory study. Dev. Behav. 32:538–61
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 37. 
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 2012. Illegal Trade in Environmentally Sensitive Goods Paris: OECD https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264174238-en
    [Crossref]
  38. 38. 
    Wyler LS, Sheikh PA. 2013. International Illegal Trade in Wildlife: Threats and U.S. Policy Washington, DC: Congr. Res. Serv., Library Congr.
  39. 39. 
    Nellemann C, Henriksen R, Raxter P, Ash N, Mrema E 2014. Environmental Crime Crisis: Threats to Sustainable Development from Illegal Exploitation and Trade in Wildlife and Forest Resources Nairobi, Arendal: UNEP, GRID
  40. 40. 
    Robinson JE, Sinovas P. Challenges of analyzing the global trade in CITES-listed wildlife. Conserv. Biol. 32:1203–6
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 41. 
    Harfoot M, Glaser SAM, Tittensor DP, Britten GL, McLardy C et al. 2018. Unveiling the patterns and trends in 40 years of global trade in CITES-listed wildlife. Biol. Conserv. 223:47–57
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 42. 
    Gerson H, Cudmore B, Mandrak NE, Coote LD, Farr K, Baillargeon G 2008. Monitoring international wildlife trade with coded species data. Conserv. Biol. 22:4–7
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 43. 
    Blundell AG, Mascia MB. 2005. Discrepancies in reported levels of international wildlife trade. Conserv. Biol. 19:2020–25
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 44. 
    Cowlishaw G, Mendelson S, Rowcliffe JM 2005. Structure and operation of a bushmeat commodity chain in southwestern Ghana. Conserv. Biol. 19:139–49
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 45. 
    De Merode E, Cowlishaw G 2006. Species protection, the changing informal economy, and the politics of access to the bushmeat trade in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Conserv. Biol. 20:1262–71
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 46. 
    Phelps J, Biggs D, Webb EL 2016. Tools and terms for understanding illegal wildlife trade. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14:479–89
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 47. 
    Hinsley A, Nuno A, Ridout M, John FAVS, Roberts DL 2017. Estimating the extent of CITES noncompliance among traders and end-consumers; lessons from the global orchid trade. Conserv. Lett. 10:602–9
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 48. 
    Ayling J. 2013. What sustains wildlife crime? Rhino horn trading and the resilience of criminal networks. J. Int. Wildlife Law Policy 16:57–80
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 49. 
    Hotelling H. 1931. The economics of exhaustible resources. J. Political Econ. 39:137–75
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 50. 
    Gordon HS. 1954. The economic theory of a common-property resource: the fishery. J. Political Econ. 62:124–42
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 51. 
    Scott A. 1955. The fishery: the objectives of sole ownership. J. Political Econ. 63:116–24
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 52. 
    Samuelson PA. 1976. Economics of forestry in an evolving society. Econ. Inq. 14:466–92
    [Google Scholar]
  53. 53. 
    Clark CW. 2010. Mathematical Bioeconomics: The Mathematics of Conservation Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
  54. 54. 
    Clark CW. 1973. The economics of overexploitation. Science 181:630–34
    [Google Scholar]
  55. 55. 
    Coase RH. 1960. The problem of social cost. J. Law Econ. 3:1–44
    [Google Scholar]
  56. 56. 
    Demsetz H. 1967. Toward a theory of property rights. Am. Econ. Rev. 57:347–59
    [Google Scholar]
  57. 57. 
    Hardin G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–48
    [Google Scholar]
  58. 58. 
    Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  59. 59. 
    Berkes F 1989. Common Property Resources. Ecology and Community-Based Sustainable Development. London: Belhaven Press
  60. 60. 
    Martin EB. 1983. Rhino Exploitation Hong Kong: World Wildlife Fund
  61. 61. 
    Caughley G, Dublin H, Parker I 1990. Projected decline of the African elephant. Biol. Conserv. 54:157–64
    [Google Scholar]
  62. 62. 
    Milner-Gulland EJ, Mace R. 1991. The impact of the ivory trade on the African elephant Loxodonta africana population as assessed by data from the trade. Biol. Conserv. 55:215–29
    [Google Scholar]
  63. 63. 
    Barbier EB, Burgess JC, Swanson TM, Pearce DW 1990. Elephants, Economics and Ivory London: Earthscan
  64. 64. 
    Poole JH, Thomsen JB. 1989. Elephant are not beetles: implications of the ivory trade for the survival of the African elephant. Oryx 23:188
    [Google Scholar]
  65. 65. 
    Bergstrom T. 1990. On the economics of crime and confiscation. J. Econ. Perspect. 4:171–78
    [Google Scholar]
  66. 66. 
    Swanson TM. 1994. The International Regulation of Extinction London: Macmillan
  67. 67. 
    Kremer M, Morcom C. 2000. Elephants. Am. Econ. Rev. 90:212–34
    [Google Scholar]
  68. 68. 
    Fischer C. 2004. The complex interactions of markets for endangered species products. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 48:926–53
    [Google Scholar]
  69. 69. 
    Bulte EH, Damania R. 2005. An economic assessment of wildlife farming and conservation. Conserv. Biol. 19:1222–33
    [Google Scholar]
  70. 70. 
    Abbott B, van Kooten GC 2011. Can domestication of wildlife lead to conservation? The economics of tiger farming in China. Ecol. Econ. 70:721–28
    [Google Scholar]
  71. 71. 
    Bulte EH, Damania R, Van Kooten GC 2007. The effects of one-off ivory sales on elephant mortality. J. Wildlife Manag. 71:613–18
    [Google Scholar]
  72. 72. 
    Mason CF, Bulte EH, Horan RD 2012. Banking on extinction: endangered species and speculation. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 28:180–92
    [Google Scholar]
  73. 73. 
    Bulte EH, Barbier EB. 2005. Trade and renewable resources in a second best world: an overview. Environ. Resour. Econ. 30:423–63
    [Google Scholar]
  74. 74. 
    van Kooten GC. 2008. Protecting the African elephant: a dynamic bioeconomic model of ivory trade. Biol. Conserv. 141:2012–22
    [Google Scholar]
  75. 75. 
    Do Q-T, Levchenko AA, Ma L, Blanc J, Dublin H, Milliken T 2018. The price elasticity of African elephant poaching Rep. 3122824, Soc. Sci. Res. Netw. Rochester, NY:
  76. 76. 
    TRAFFIC 2008. What's Driving the Wildlife Trade? A Review of Expert Opinion on Economic and Social Drivers of the Wildlife Trade and Trade Control Efforts in Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR and Vietnam Washington, DC: World Bank
  77. 77. 
    Moreto WD 2018. Wildlife Crime: From Theory to Practice Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press
  78. 78. 
    Leader-Williams N, Milner‐Gulland EJ. 1993. Policies for the enforcement of wildlife laws: the balance between detection and penalties in Luangwa Valley, Zambia. Conserv. Biol. 7:611–17
    [Google Scholar]
  79. 79. 
    Milner-Gulland EJ, Leader-Williams N. 1992. A model of incentives for the illegal exploitation of black rhinos and elephants: poaching pays in Luangwa Valley, Zambia. J. Appl. Ecol. 29:388–401
    [Google Scholar]
  80. 80. 
    Lopes AA. 2015. Organized crimes against nature: elephants in southern Africa. Nat. Resour. Model. 28:86–107
    [Google Scholar]
  81. 81. 
    Nagin DS. 2013. Deterrence in the twenty-first century. Crime Justice: Rev. Res. 42:199
    [Google Scholar]
  82. 82. 
    Nuno A, Blumenthal JM, Austin TJ, Bothwell J, Ebanks-Petrie G et al. 2018. Understanding implications of consumer behavior for wildlife farming and sustainable wildlife trade. Conserv. Biol. 32:390–400
    [Google Scholar]
  83. 83. 
    Hinsley A, Keane A, St. John FAV, Ibbett H, Nuno A 2019. Asking sensitive questions using the Unmatched Count Technique: applications and guidelines for conservation. Methods Ecol. Evol 10:308–19
    [Google Scholar]
  84. 84. 
    McNamara J, Rowcliffe M, Cowlishaw G, Alexander JS, Ntiamoa-Baidu Y et al. 2016. Characterising wildlife trade market supply-demand dynamics. PLOS ONE 11:e0162972
    [Google Scholar]
  85. 85. 
    Courchamp F, Angulo E, Rivalan P, Hall RJ, Signoret L et al. 2006. Rarity value and species extinction: the Anthropogenic Allee effect. PLOS Biol 4:e415
    [Google Scholar]
  86. 86. 
    Hall RJ, Milner-Gulland EJ, Courchamp F 2008. Endangering the endangered: the effects of perceived rarity on species exploitation. Conserv. Lett. 1:75–81
    [Google Scholar]
  87. 87. 
    Chen F. 2016. Poachers and snobs: demand for rarity and the effects of antipoaching policies. Conserv. Lett. 9:65–69
    [Google Scholar]
  88. 88. 
    Hübschle A. 2017. Fluid interfaces between flows of rhino horn. Global Crime 3:198–217
    [Google Scholar]
  89. 89. 
    Zimmerman ME. 2003. The black market for wildlife: combating transnational organized crime in the illegal wildlife trade. Vanderbilt J. Transnatl. Law 36:1657
    [Google Scholar]
  90. 90. 
    Smith RJ, Biggs D, St. John FAV, ‘t Sas-Rolfes M, Barrington R 2015. Elephant conservation and corruption beyond the ivory trade. Conserv. Biol 29:953–56
    [Google Scholar]
  91. 91. 
    Moyle B. 2009. The black market in China for tiger products. Global Crime 10:124–43
    [Google Scholar]
  92. 92. 
    Basu G. 2014. Concealment, corruption, and evasion: a transaction cost and case analysis of illicit supply chain activity. J. Transportation Sec. 7:209–26
    [Google Scholar]
  93. 93. 
    Haas TC, Ferreira SM. 2015. Federated databases and actionable intelligence: using social network analysis to disrupt transnational wildlife trafficking criminal networks. Secur. Inform. 4:2
    [Google Scholar]
  94. 94. 
    Lavorgna A. 2014. Wildlife trafficking in the Internet age. Crime Sci 3:5
    [Google Scholar]
  95. 95. 
    Hinsley A, Lee TE, Harrison JR, Roberts DL 2016. Estimating the extent and structure of trade in horticultural orchids via social media. Conserv. Biol. 30:1038–47
    [Google Scholar]
  96. 96. 
    Duffy R, Massé F, Smidt E, Marijnen E, Büscher B et al. 2019. Why we must question the militarisation of conservation. Biol. Conserv. 232:66–73
    [Google Scholar]
  97. 97. 
    Vucetich JA, Bruskotter JT, Nelson MP 2015. Evaluating whether nature's intrinsic value is an axiom of or anathema to conservation. Conserv. Biol. 29:321–32
    [Google Scholar]
  98. 98. 
    Baker SE, Cain R, van Kesteren F, Zommers ZA, D'Cruze N, Macdonald DW 2013. Rough trade: animal welfare in the global wildlife trade. BioScience 63:928–38
    [Google Scholar]
  99. 99. 
    ‘t Sas-Rolfes M. 2016. Commodifying wildlife. In Philosophy: Environmental Ethics D Schmidtz 185–219 Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan
    [Google Scholar]
  100. 100. 
    Wallach AD, Bekoff M, Batavia C, Nelson MP, Ramp D 2018. Summoning compassion to address the challenges of conservation. Conserv. Biol. 32:1255–65
    [Google Scholar]
  101. 101. 
    Hayward MW, Callen A, Allen BL, Ballard G, Broekhuis F et al. 2019. Deconstructing compassionate conservation. Conserv. Biol. 33:760–68
    [Google Scholar]
  102. 102. 
    Arthur LM, Wilson WR. 1979. Assessing the demand for wildlife resources: a first step. Wildlife Soc. Bull. 7:30–34
    [Google Scholar]
  103. 103. 
    Wilkie DS, Godoy RA. 2002. Income and price elasticities of bushmeat demand in lowland Amerindian societies. Conserv. Biol. 15:761–69
    [Google Scholar]
  104. 104. 
    Wilkie DS, Starkey M, Abernethy K, Effa EN, Telfer P, Godoy R 2005. Role of prices and wealth in consumer demand for bushmeat in Gabon, Central Africa. Conserv. Biol. 19:268–74
    [Google Scholar]
  105. 105. 
    Drury R. 2009. Reducing urban demand for wild animals in Vietnam: examining the potential of wildlife farming as a conservation tool. Conserv. Lett. 2:263–70
    [Google Scholar]
  106. 106. 
    Dutton AJ, Hepburn C, Macdonald DW 2011. A stated preference investigation into the Chinese demand for farmed versus wild bear bile. PLOS ONE 6:e21243
    [Google Scholar]
  107. 107. 
    Hinsley A, Verissimo D, Roberts DL 2015. Heterogeneity in consumer preferences for orchids in international trade and the potential for the use of market research methods to study demand for wildlife. Biol. Conserv. 190:80–86
    [Google Scholar]
  108. 108. 
    Shairp R, Veríssimo D, Fraser I, Challender D, MacMillan D 2016. Understanding urban demand for wild meat in Vietnam: implications for conservation actions. PLOS ONE 11:e0134787
    [Google Scholar]
  109. 109. 
    Maxwell SL, Fuller RA, Brooks TM, Watson JEM 2016. Biodiversity: the ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers. Nat. News 536:143–45
    [Google Scholar]
  110. 110. 
    Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter S, Kinzig A 2004. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 9:5
    [Google Scholar]
  111. 111. 
    Williamson OE. 2000. The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead. J. Econ. Lit. 38:595–613
    [Google Scholar]
  112. 112. 
    Stoett P. 2002. The international regulation of trade in wildlife: institutional and normative considerations. Int. Environ. Agreements 2:193–208
    [Google Scholar]
  113. 113. 
    Young OR. 2002. Institutional interplay: the environmental consequences of cross-scale interactions. The Drama of the Commons E Ostrom, T Dietz, N Dolsak, P Stern, S Stonich, E Weber 263–92 Washington, DC: Nat. Acad. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  114. 114. 
    Michie S, Johnston M. 2012. Theories and Techniques of Behaviour Change: Developing a Cumulative Science of Behaviour Change Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis
  115. 115. 
    Gintis H. 2014. The Bounds of Reason: Game Theory and the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  116. 116. 
    St John FA, Edwards-Jones G, Jones JP 2011. Conservation and human behaviour: lessons from social psychology. Wildlife Res 37:658–67
    [Google Scholar]
  117. 117. 
    Greenfield S, Veríssimo D. 2019. To what extent is social marketing used in demand reduction campaigns for illegal wildlife products? Insights from elephant ivory and rhino horn. Soc. Marketing Q. 25:40–54
    [Google Scholar]
  118. 118. 
    Burgess G. 2016. Powers of persuasion?. Traffic Bull 28:65
    [Google Scholar]
  119. 119. 
    Moro M, Fischer A, Czajkowski M, Brennan D, Lowassa A et al. 2013. An investigation using the choice experiment method into options for reducing illegal bushmeat hunting in western Serengeti. Conserv. Lett. 6:37–45
    [Google Scholar]
  120. 120. 
    ‘t Sas-Rolfes M. 2017. African wildlife conservation and the evolution of hunting institutions. Environ. Res. Lett. 12:115007
    [Google Scholar]
  121. 121. 
    Williams VL, ‘t Sas-Rolfes MJ 2019. Born captive: a survey of the lion breeding, keeping and hunting industries in South Africa. PLOS ONE 14:e0217409
    [Google Scholar]
  122. 122. 
    Huxley C. 2000. CITES—the vision. Endangered Species, Threatened Convention: The Past, Present and Future of CITES, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora J Hutton, B Dickson 3–12 London: Earthscan
    [Google Scholar]
  123. 123. 
    Couzens E. 2013. CITES at forty: never too late to make lifestyle changes. RECIEL 22:311–23
    [Google Scholar]
  124. 124. 
    Wijnstekers W. 2018. The Evolution of CITES: A Reference to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora Budakeszi, Hungary: Int. Counc. Game Wildl. Conserv.
  125. 125. 
    Duffy R. 2013. Global environmental governance and north—south dynamics: the case of the CITES. Environ. Plann. C 31:222–39
    [Google Scholar]
  126. 126. 
    Favre D. 1993. Debate within the CITES community: what direction for the future. Nat. Resour. J. 33:875–918
    [Google Scholar]
  127. 127. 
    Dickson B. 2000. Precaution at the heart of CITES?. Endangered Species, Threatened Convention: The Past, Present and Future of CITES, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora J Hutton, B Dickson 38–46 London: Earthscan
    [Google Scholar]
  128. 128. 
    Biggs D, Cooney R, Roe D, Dublin HT, Allan JR et al. 2017. Developing a theory of change for a community-based response to illegal wildlife trade. Conserv. Biol. 31:5–12
    [Google Scholar]
  129. 129. 
    Gehring T, Ruffing E. 2008. When arguments prevail over power: the CITES procedure for the listing of endangered species. Glob. Environ. Politics 8:123–48
    [Google Scholar]
  130. 130. 
    Vincent ACJ, Sadovy de Mitcheson YJ, Fowler SL, Lieberman S 2014. The role of CITES in the conservation of marine fishes subject to international trade. Fish Fisheries 15:563–92
    [Google Scholar]
  131. 131. 
    Tyrrell M, Clark DA. 2014. What happened to climate change? CITES and the reconfiguration of polar bear conservation discourse. Glob. Environ. Change 24:363–72
    [Google Scholar]
  132. 132. 
    Hinsley A, de Boer HJ, Fay MF, Gale SW, Gardiner LM et al. 2018. A review of the trade in orchids and its implications for conservation. Bot. J. Linnean Soc. 186:435–55
    [Google Scholar]
  133. 133. 
    McFadden E. 1987. Asian compliance with CITES: problems and prospects. Boston Univ. Int. Law J. 5:311
    [Google Scholar]
  134. 134. 
    Patel S. 1995. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species: enforcement and the last unicorn. Houston J. Int. Law 18:157
    [Google Scholar]
  135. 135. 
    Sand PH. 2013. Enforcing CITES: the rise and fall of trade sanctions. Rev. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law 22:251–63
    [Google Scholar]
  136. 136. 
    Bowman M. 2013. A tale of two CITES: divergent perspectives upon the effectiveness of the wildlife trade convention. Rev. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law 22:228–38
    [Google Scholar]
  137. 137. 
    Challender DWS, Harrop SR, Macmillan DC 2015. Understanding markets to conserve trade-threatened species in CITES. Biol. Conserv. 187:249–59
    [Google Scholar]
  138. 138. 
    Abensperg-Traun M. 2009. CITES, sustainable use of wild species and incentive-driven conservation in developing countries, with an emphasis on southern Africa. Biol. Conserv. 142:948–63
    [Google Scholar]
  139. 139. 
    Challender DWS, MacMillan DC. 2014. Poaching is more than an enforcement problem. Conserv. Lett. 7:484–94
    [Google Scholar]
  140. 140. 
    Baylis K, Honey‐Rosés J, Börner J, Corbera E, Ezzine‐de‐Blas D et al. 2016. Mainstreaming impact evaluation in nature conservation. Conserv. Lett. 9:58–64
    [Google Scholar]
  141. 141. 
    Ferraro PJ. 2009. Counterfactual thinking and impact evaluation in environmental policy. New Dir. Eval. 2009:75–84
    [Google Scholar]
  142. 142. 
    World Bank 2016. Analysis of International Funding to Tackle Illegal Wildlife Trade Washington, DC: World Bank
  143. 143. 
    Watson JEM, Dudley N, Segan DB, Hockings M 2014. The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature 515:67–73
    [Google Scholar]
  144. 144. 
    Leverington F, Costa KL, Pavese H, Lisle A, Hockings M 2010. A global analysis of protected area management effectiveness. Environ. Manag. 46:685–98
    [Google Scholar]
  145. 145. 
    Hilborn R, Arcese P, Borner M, Hando J, Hopcraft G et al. 2001. Effective enforcement in a conservation area. Science 314:1266
    [Google Scholar]
  146. 146. 
    Smith RJ, Muir RDJ, Walpole MJ, Balmford A, Leader-Williams N 2003. Governance and the loss of biodversity. Nature 426:67–70
    [Google Scholar]
  147. 147. 
    Hauenstein S, Kshatriya M, Blanc J, Dormann CF, Beale CM 2019. African elephant poaching rates correlate with local poverty, national corruption and global ivory price. Nat. Commun. 10:2242
    [Google Scholar]
  148. 148. 
    Coad L, Watson JE, Geldmann J, Burgess ND, Leverington F et al. 2019. Widespread shortfalls in protected area resourcing undermine efforts to conserve biodiversity. Front. Ecol. Environ. 17:259–64
    [Google Scholar]
  149. 149. 
    Critchlow R, Plumptre AJ, Driciru M, Rwetsiba A, Stokes EJ et al. 2015. Spatiotemporal trends of illegal activities from ranger-collected data in a Ugandan national park. Conserv. Biol. 29:1458–70
    [Google Scholar]
  150. 150. 
    Challender DWS, Harrop SR, MacMillan DC 2015. Towards informed and multi-faceted wildlife trade interventions. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 3:129–48
    [Google Scholar]
  151. 151. 
    Naidoo R, Weaver LC, Diggle RW, Matongo G, Stuart-Hill G, Thouless C 2016. Complementary benefits of tourism and hunting to communal conservancies in Namibia. Conserv. Biol. 30:628–38
    [Google Scholar]
  152. 152. 
    Roe D, Booker F, Day M, Zhou W, Allebone-Webb S et al. 2015. Are alternative livelihood projects effective at reducing local threats to specified elements of biodiversity and/or improving or maintaining the conservation status of those elements?. Environ. Evidence 4:22
    [Google Scholar]
  153. 153. 
    Rubino EC, Pienaar EF, Soto JR 2018. Structuring legal trade in rhino horn to incentivize the participation of South African private landowners. Ecol. Econ. 154:306–16
    [Google Scholar]
  154. 154. 
    Cooney R, Roe D, Dublin H, Phelps J, Wilkie D et al. 2017. From poachers to protectors: engaging local communities in solutions to illegal wildlife trade. Conserv. Lett. 10:367–74
    [Google Scholar]
  155. 155. 
    Brooks EGE, Roberton SI, Bell DJ 2010. The conservation impact of commercial wildlife farming of porcupines in Vietnam. Biol. Conserv. 143:2808–14
    [Google Scholar]
  156. 156. 
    Williams SJ, Jones JPG, Annewandter R, Gibbons JM 2014. Cultivation can increase harvesting pressure on overexploited plant populations. Ecol. Appl. 24:2050–62
    [Google Scholar]
  157. 157. 
    Williams VL, Loveridge AJ, Newton DJ, Macdonald DW 2015. ‘Skullduggery’: lions align and their mandibles rock!. PLOS ONE 10:e0135144
    [Google Scholar]
  158. 158. 
    Phelps J, Carrasco LR, Webb EL 2014. A framework for assessing supply-side wildlife conservation: wildlife farming and cultivation. Conserv. Biol. 28:244–57
    [Google Scholar]
  159. 159. 
    ‘t Sas-Rolfes M, Moyle B, Stiles D 2014. The complex policy issue of elephant ivory stockpile management. Pachyderm 55:62–77
    [Google Scholar]
  160. 160. 
    Chen F. 2017. The economics of synthetic rhino horns. Ecol. Econ. 141:180–89
    [Google Scholar]
  161. 161. 
    Baker CS. 2008. A truer measure of the market: the molecular ecology of fisheries and wildlife trade. Mol. Ecol. 17:3985–98
    [Google Scholar]
  162. 162. 
    Wasser SK, Mailand C, Booth R, Mutayoba B, Kisamo E et al. 2007. Using DNA to track the origin of the largest ivory seizure since the 1989 trade ban. PNAS 104:4228–33
    [Google Scholar]
  163. 163. 
    Dormontt EE, Boner M, Braun B, Breulmann G, Degen B et al. 2015. Forensic timber identification: It's time to integrate disciplines to combat illegal logging. Biol. Conserv. 191:790–98
    [Google Scholar]
  164. 164. 
    de Boer HJ, Ghorbani A, Manzanilla V, Raclariu A-C, Kreziou A et al. 2017. DNA metabarcoding of orchid-derived products reveals widespread illegal orchid trade. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 284:20171182
    [Google Scholar]
  165. 165. 
    Tröster R, Hiete M. 2018. Success of voluntary sustainability certification schemes—a comprehensive review. J. Cleaner Prod. 196:1034–43
    [Google Scholar]
  166. 166. 
    Englund O, Berndes G. 2015. How do sustainability standards consider biodiversity?. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Energy Environ. 4:26–50
    [Google Scholar]
  167. 167. 
    Wyatt T, Johnson K, Hunter L, George R, Gunter R 2018. Corruption and wildlife trafficking: three case studies involving Asia. Asian J. Criminol. 13:35–55
    [Google Scholar]
  168. 168. 
    van Uhm DP, Moreto WD 2018. Corruption within the illegal wildlife trade: a symbiotic and antithetical enterprise. Br. J. Criminol. 58:864–85
    [Google Scholar]
  169. 169. 
    Bennett EL. 2015. Legal ivory trade in a corrupt world and its impact on African elephant populations. Conserv. Biol. 29:54–60
    [Google Scholar]
  170. 170. 
    Patel NG, Rorres C, Joly DO, Brownstein JS, Boston R et al. 2015. Quantitative methods of identifying the key nodes in the illegal wildlife trade network. PNAS 112:7948–53
    [Google Scholar]
  171. 171. 
    World Bank 2018. Tools and Resources to Combat Illegal Wildlife Trade Washington, DC: World Bank
  172. 172. 
    Haenlein C, Keatinge T. 2017. Follow the Money: Using Financial Investigation to Combat Wildlife Crime London: RUSI
  173. 173. 
    Graham-Rowe D. 2011. Biodiversity: endangered and in demand. Nature 480:S101–S03
    [Google Scholar]
  174. 174. 
    Rivalan P, Delmas V, Angulo E, Bull LS, Hall RJ et al. 2007. Can bans stimulate wildlife trade?. Nature 447:529–30
    [Google Scholar]
  175. 175. 
    van Asch E. 2016. The International Consortium on Combating Wildlife Crime (ICCWC). Handbook of Transnational Environmental Crime L Elliott, WH Schaedla 469–77 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
  176. 176. 
    Ayling J. 2016. Transnational environmental crime: meeting future challenges through networked regulatory innovations. Greening Criminology in the 21st Century M Hall, T Wyatt, N South, A Nurse, G Potter, J Maher 73–90 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  177. 177. 
    Jeffreys E. 2016. Translocal celebrity activism: shark-protection campaigns in mainland China. Environ. Commun. 10:763–76
    [Google Scholar]
  178. 178. 
    Veríssimo D, Wan AKY. 2018. Characterizing efforts to reduce consumer demand for wildlife products. Conserv. Biol. 33:623–33
    [Google Scholar]
  179. 179. 
    Cheung H, Mazerolle L, Possingham HP, Biggs D 2018. Medicinal use and legalized trade of rhinoceros horn from the perspective of traditional Chinese medicine practitioners in Hong Kong. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 11: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082918787428
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  180. 180. 
    Olmedo A, Sharif V, Milner-Gulland EJ 2018. Evaluating the design of behavior change interventions: a case study of rhino horn in Vietnam. Conserv. Lett. 11:e12365
    [Google Scholar]
  181. 181. 
    Duthie E, Veríssimo D, Keane A, Knight AT 2017. The effectiveness of celebrities in conservation marketing. PLOS ONE 12:e0180027
    [Google Scholar]
  182. 182. 
    Nuno A, St. John FAV 2015. How to ask sensitive questions in conservation: a review of specialized questioning techniques. Biol. Conserv. 189:5–15
    [Google Scholar]
  183. 183. 
    Megias DA, Anderson SC, Smith RJ, Veríssimo D 2017. Investigating the impact of media on demand for wildlife: a case study of Harry Potter and the UK trade in owls. PLOS ONE 12:e0182368
    [Google Scholar]
  184. 184. 
    Byerly H, Balmford A, Ferraro PJ, Hammond Wagner C, Palchak E et al. 2018. Nudging pro‐environmental behavior: evidence and opportunities. Front. Ecol. Environ. 16:159–68
    [Google Scholar]
  185. 185. 
    Chaves WA, Valle DR, Monroe MC, Wilkie DS, Sieving KE, Sadowsky B 2018. Changing wild meat consumption: an experiment in the central Amazon, Brazil. Conserv. Lett. 11:e12391
    [Google Scholar]
  186. 186. 
    Salazar G, Mills M, Veríssimo D 2018. Qualitative impact evaluation of a social marketing campaign for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 33:634–55
    [Google Scholar]
  187. 187. 
    Veríssimo D, Schmid C, Kimario FF, Eves HE 2018. Measuring the impact of an entertainment-education intervention to reduce demand for bushmeat. Anim. Conserv. 21:324–31
    [Google Scholar]
  188. 188. 
    Sutherland WJ, Butchart SHM, Connor B, Culshaw C, Dicks LV et al. 2018. A 2018 Horizon scan of emerging issues for global conservation and biological diversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33:47–58
    [Google Scholar]
  189. 189. 
    Milner‐Gulland EJ, Shea K. 2017. Embracing uncertainty in applied ecology. J. Appl. Ecol. 54:2063–68
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033253
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033253
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error