1932

Abstract

We outline the frameworks that shape and hold apart waste debates in and about the Global North and Global South and that hinder analysis of flows between them. Typically, waste is addressed as municipal waste, resulting in a focus on domestic consumption and urban governance and an emphasis on cities and the national scale. The prevailing ways of addressing the increasingly global flows of wastes between the North and South are those of global environmental justice and are underpinned by the geographical imagination encoded in the Basel Convention. New research on the trades in used goods and recycling in lower income countries challenges these accounts. It shows that arguments about dumping on the South need revision. Wastes are secondary resources for lower income countries, harvesting them is a significant economic activity, and consequent resource recovery is a key part of the global economy. Four areas for future research are identified: () changing patterns of global harvesting, () attempts to rescale resource recovery and the challenges faced, () the geopolitics of resource recovery, and () changes in resource recovery in lower income countries.

[Erratum, Closure]

An erratum has been published for this article:
From Waste to Resource: The Trade in Wastes and Global Recycling Economies
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021105
2015-11-04
2024-10-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/energy/40/1/annurev-environ-102014-021105.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021105&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Mohai P, Pellow D, Roberts J. 1.  2009. Environmental justice. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 34:405–30 [Google Scholar]
  2. Schlosberg D. 2.  2004. Reconceiving environmental justice: global movements and political theory. Environ. Polit. 13:3517–40 [Google Scholar]
  3. McDonald S, Oates C. 3.  2003. Reasons for non-participation in a kerbside recycling scheme. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 39:4369–85 [Google Scholar]
  4. Robinson G, Read A. 4.  2005. Recycling behaviour in a London borough: results from large-scale household surveys. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 45:170–83 [Google Scholar]
  5. Tudor T, Robinson G, Riley M, Guilbert S, Barr S. 5.  2011. Challenges facing the sustainable consumption of waste management: perspectives on UK households. Local Environ. 16:151–66 [Google Scholar]
  6. Barr S, Gilg A. 6.  2006. Sustainable lifestyles: framing environmental action around the home. Geoforum 37:6906–20 [Google Scholar]
  7. Davoudi S, Evans N. 7.  2005. The challenge of governance in regional waste planning. Environ. Plan. C 24:5681–700 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bulkeley H, Watson M, Hudson R. 8.  2007. Modes of governing municipal waste. Environ. Plan. A 41:112733–53 [Google Scholar]
  9. Davies A. 9.  2008. Geographies of Garbage Governance: Interventions, Interactions and Outcomes Aldershot, UK: Ashgate [Google Scholar]
  10. Gregson N, Metcalfe A, Crewe L. 10.  2007. Identity, mobility and the throwaway society. Environ. Plan. D 25:4682–700 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gregson N, Metcalfe A, Crewe L. 11.  2007. Moving things along: the conduits and practices of divestment in consumption. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 32:2187–200 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hetherington K. 12.  2004. Secondhandedness: consumption, disposal, and absent presence. Environ. Plan. D 22:1157–73 [Google Scholar]
  13. Evans D. 13.  2012. Beyond the throwaway society: ordinary domestic practice and a sociological approach to household food waste. Sociology 46:141–58 [Google Scholar]
  14. Myers G. 14.  2005. Disposable Cities: Garbage, Governance and Sustainable Development in Urban Africa Aldershot, UK: Ashgate [Google Scholar]
  15. Medina M. 15.  2000. Scavenger cooperatives in Asia and Latin America. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 31:51–69 [Google Scholar]
  16. Medina M. 16.  2007. The World's Scavengers Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press [Google Scholar]
  17. Wilson D, Velis C, Cheeseman C. 17.  2006. Role of informal sector recycling in waste management in developing countries. Habitat Int. 30:4797–808 [Google Scholar]
  18. Martuzzi M, Mitis F, Forastiere F. 18.  2010. Inequalities, inequities, environmental justice in waste management and health. Eur. J. Public Health 20:121–26 [Google Scholar]
  19. Vergara S, Tchobanoglous G. 19.  2012. Municipal solid waste and the environment: a global perspective. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 37:277–309 [Google Scholar]
  20. Clapp J. 20.  2001. Toxic Exports: The Transfer of Hazardous Waste from Rich to Poor Countries Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  21. Pellow D. 21.  2007. Resisting Global Toxics: Transnational Movements for Environmental Justice Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  22. 22. Basel Action Network (BAN) 2002. Exporting Harm: The High-Tech Trashing of Asia Seattle: BAN [Google Scholar]
  23. Iles A. 23.  2004. Mapping environmental justice in technology flows: computer waste impacts in Asia. Glob. Environ. Polit. 4:476–107 [Google Scholar]
  24. Minter A. 24.  2013. Junkyard Planet: Travels in the Billion Dollar Trash Trade London: Bloomsbury [Google Scholar]
  25. Rivoli P. 25.  2005. Travels of a T-shirt in the Global Economy Oxford: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  26. Gregson N, Crang M, Ahamed F, Akter N, Ferdous R. 26.  2010. Following things of rubbish value: end-of-life ships, “chock-chocky” furniture and the Bangladeshi middle class consumer. Geoforum 41:6846–54 [Google Scholar]
  27. Alexander C, Reno J. 27.  2012. Economies of Recycling: The Global Transformation of Materials, Values and Social Relations London: Zed Books [Google Scholar]
  28. Packard V. 28.  2011 (1960). The Waste Makers New York: Ig Publ. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rodgers H. 29.  2005. Gone Tomorrow: The Hidden Life of Garbage New York: New Press [Google Scholar]
  30. Royle E. 30.  2005. Garbage Land: On the Secret Trail of Trash New York: Back Bay Books [Google Scholar]
  31. Humes E. 31.  2012. Garbology: Our Dirty Love Affair with Trash New York: Penguin [Google Scholar]
  32. Do Valle P, Reis E, Menezes J, Rebelo E. 32.  2004. Behavioural determinants of household recycling participation—the Portuguese case. Environ. Behav. 36:4505–40 [Google Scholar]
  33. Martin H, Williams I, Clark M. 33.  2006. Social, cultural and structural influences on household waste recycling: a case study. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 48:4357–95 [Google Scholar]
  34. Collins A, O'Doherty R, Snell M. 34.  2006. Household participation in waste recycling: some national survey evidence from Scotland. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 49:1121–40 [Google Scholar]
  35. Nixon H, Saphores J-D. 35.  2009. Information and the decision to recycle: results from a survey of US households. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 52:2257–77 [Google Scholar]
  36. Fiorillo D. 36.  2013. Household waste recycling: national survey evidence from Italy. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 56:81125–51 [Google Scholar]
  37. Gillespie R, Bennett J. 37.  2013. Willingness to pay for kerbside recycling in Brisbane, Australia. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 56:3362–77 [Google Scholar]
  38. Byrne S, O'Regan B. 38.  2014. Attitudes and actions towards recycling behaviours in the Limerick, Ireland region. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 87:89–96 [Google Scholar]
  39. Robertson S, Walkington H. 39.  2009. Recycling and waste minimisation behaviours of the transient student population in Oxford: results from an online survey. Local Environ. 14:4285–96 [Google Scholar]
  40. Andrews A, Gregoire M, Rasmussen H, Witowich G. 40.  2013. Comparison of recycling outcomes in three types of recycling collection units. Waste Manag. 33:530–35 [Google Scholar]
  41. Barr S, Shaw G, Gilg A. 41.  2011. The policy and practice of “sustainable lifestyles.”. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 54:101331–50 [Google Scholar]
  42. Thomas C, Sharp V. 42.  2013. Understanding the normalisations of recycling behaviour and its implications for other pro-environmental behaviours. A review of social norms and recycling. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 79:11–20 [Google Scholar]
  43. Shove E. 43.  2010. Beyond the ABC: climate change policies and theories of social change. Environ. Plan. A 42:61273–85 [Google Scholar]
  44. Nixon H, Saphores J-D. 44.  2009. Information and the decision to recycle: results from a survey of US households. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 52:2257–77 [Google Scholar]
  45. Evison T, Read A. 45.  2001. Local authority recycling and waste—awareness publicity/promotion. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 32:3/4275–91 [Google Scholar]
  46. Timlett R, Williams I. 46.  2008. Public participation and recycling performance in England: a comparison of tools for behaviour change. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 52:4622–34 [Google Scholar]
  47. Nomura H, John P, Cotterill S. 47.  2011. The use of feedback to enhance environmental outcomes: a randomised control trial of a food waste scheme. Local Environ. 16:7637–53 [Google Scholar]
  48. Read M, Gregory K, Phillips S. 48.  2009. An evaluation of four key methods monitoring household waste prevention campaigns in the UK. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 54:19–20 [Google Scholar]
  49. Zorpas A, Lasaridi K. 49.  2013. Measuring waste prevention. Waste Manag. 33:1047–56 [Google Scholar]
  50. Tonglet M, Phillips P, Bates M. 50.  2004. Determining the drivers for householder pro-environmental behaviour: waste minimisation compared to recycling. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 42:127–48 [Google Scholar]
  51. Barr S. 51.  2007. Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviours—a UK case study of household management. Environ. Behav. 39:4435–73 [Google Scholar]
  52. Bortoleto A, Kurisu K, Hanake K. 52.  2012. Model development for household waste prevention behaviour. Waste Manag. 32:122195–207 [Google Scholar]
  53. Farrelly T, Tucker C. 53.  2014. Action research and residential waste minimisation in Palmerston North, New Zealand. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 91:11–26 [Google Scholar]
  54. Himley M. 54.  2008. Geographies of environmental governance: the nexus of nature and neoliberalism. Geogr. Compass 2:2433–51 [Google Scholar]
  55. Petts J. 55.  2001. Evaluating the effectiveness of deliberative processes: waste management case studies. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 44:2207–26 [Google Scholar]
  56. Petts J. 56.  2004. Barriers to participation and deliberation in risk decisions: evidence from waste management. J. Risk Res. 7:115–33 [Google Scholar]
  57. Bulkeley H, Watson M, Hudson R, Weaver P. 57.  2005. Governing municipal waste: towards a new analytical framework. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 7:11–23 [Google Scholar]
  58. Davies A. 58.  2009. “Clean and green”? A governance analysis of waste management in New Zealand. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 52:2157–76 [Google Scholar]
  59. Lasaridi K. 59.  2009. Implementing the Landfill Directive in Greece: problems, perspectives and lessons to be learned. Geogr. J. 175:4261–73 [Google Scholar]
  60. Davies A, Fahy F, Taylor D. 60.  2005. Mind the gap! Householder attitudes and actions towards waste in Ireland. Ir. Geogr. 38:2151–68 [Google Scholar]
  61. De Feo G. 61.  2014. Sociological survey in a municipality with a high level separate collection programme in an area of historic unpopularity. Waste Manag. 34:1369–80 [Google Scholar]
  62. Woolgar S, Neyland D. 62.  2013. Mundane Governance: Ontology and Accountability Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  63. Davoudi S. 63.  2009. Scalar tensions in the governance of waste: the resilience of state spatial Keynesianism. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 52:2137–56 [Google Scholar]
  64. Gregson N, Crang M. 64.  2010. Materiality and waste: inorganic vitality in a networked world. Environ. Plan. A 42:51026–35 [Google Scholar]
  65. Douglas M. 65.  1966. Purity and Danger London: Routledge, Kegan Paul [Google Scholar]
  66. Thompson M. 66.  1979. Rubbish Theory: The Creation and Destruction of Value Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  67. Rathje W, Murphy C. 67.  1992. Rubbish: The Archaeology of Garbage New York: Harper Collins [Google Scholar]
  68. Strasser S. 68.  1999. Waste and Want: The Social History of Trash London: Metrop. Books [Google Scholar]
  69. Gregson N. 69.  2007. Living with Things: Accommodation, Ridding, Dwelling Oxford: Sean Kingston Publ. [Google Scholar]
  70. Evans D. 70.  2011. Blaming the consumer—once again: the social and material contexts of everyday food waste practices in some English households. Crit. Public Health 21:4429–40 [Google Scholar]
  71. Evans D. 71.  2012. Binning, gifting and recovery: the conduits of disposal in household food consumption. Environ. Plan. D 30:61123–37 [Google Scholar]
  72. Evans D. 72.  2014. Food Waste London: Bloomsbury [Google Scholar]
  73. Gregson N, Crewe L. 73.  2003. Second-Hand Cultures Oxford: Berg [Google Scholar]
  74. Lane R, Horne R, Bicknell J. 74.  2009. Routes of reuse of second-hand goods in Melbourne households. Aust. Geogr. 40:2151–68 [Google Scholar]
  75. Watson M, Lane R. 75.  2011. Mapping geographies of reuse in Sheffield and Melbourne. Material Geographies of Household Sustainability R Lane, A Gorman-Murray 133–56 Farnham, UK: Ashgate [Google Scholar]
  76. Watson M, Meah A. 76.  2012. Food, waste and safety: negotiating conflicting social anxieties into the practices of domestic provisioning. Sociol. Rev. 60:S2102–20 [Google Scholar]
  77. Bulkeley H, Gregson N. 77.  2009. Crossing the threshold: municipal waste policy and household waste generation. Environ. Plan. A 41:4921–45 [Google Scholar]
  78. Gregson N, Crang M, Laws J, Fleetwood T, Holmes H. 78.  2013. Moving up the waste hierarchy: car boot sales, reuse exchange and the challenges of consumer culture to waste prevention. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 77:97–107 [Google Scholar]
  79. Chappells H, Shove E. 79.  1999. The dustbin: a study of domestic waste, household practices and utility services. Int. Plan. Stud. 4:2267–80 [Google Scholar]
  80. O'Brien M. 80.  2012. A “lasting transformation” of capitalist surplus: from food stocks to feedstocks. Sociol. Rev. 60:S2192–211 [Google Scholar]
  81. Gregson N, Crang M, Fuller S, Holmes H. 81.  2015. Interrogating the circular economy: the moral economy of resource recovery in the EU. Econ. Soc. 44:2218–43 [Google Scholar]
  82. Ferrell J. 82.  2006. Empire of Scrounge New York: N.Y. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  83. Edwards F, Mercer D. 83.  2007. Gleaning from gluttony: an Australian youth subculture confronts the ethics of waste. Aust. Geogr. 38:3279–96 [Google Scholar]
  84. Barnard A. 84.  2011. “Waving the banana” at capitalism: political theatre and social movement strategy among New York's “freegan” dumpster divers. Ethnography 12:4419–44 [Google Scholar]
  85. Lane R. 85.  2011. The waste commons in an emerging resource recovery waste regime: contesting property and value in Melbourne's hard rubbish collections. Geogr. Res. 49:4395–407 [Google Scholar]
  86. Gille Z. 86.  2007. From the Cult of Waste to the Trash Heap of History: The Politics of Waste in Socialist and Post-Socialist Hungary Bloomington, IN: Indiana Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  87. Cooper T. 87.  2010. Burying the “refuse revolution”: the rise of controlled tipping in Britain, 1920–1960. Environ. Plan. A 42:51033–48 [Google Scholar]
  88. Gille Z. 88.  2010. Actor networks, modes of production, and waste regimes: reassembling the macro-social. Environ. Plan. A 42:51049–64 [Google Scholar]
  89. Zhuang Y, Wang Y-L, Wu W-X, Chen Y-X. 89.  2008. Source separation of household waste: a case study in China. Waste Manag. 28:102022–30 [Google Scholar]
  90. Afroz R, Tudin R, Hanaki K, Masud M. 90.  2011. Selected socio-economic factors affecting the willingness to minimise solid waste in Dhaka city, Bangladesh. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 54:6711–31 [Google Scholar]
  91. Mbiba M. 91.  2014. Urban solid waste characteristics and household appetite for separation at source in Eastern and Southern Africa. Habitat Int. 43:152–62 [Google Scholar]
  92. Zen I, Noor Z, Yusuf R. 92.  2014. The profiles of household solid waste recyclers and non-recyclers. Habitat Int. 42:83–69 [Google Scholar]
  93. Dwivedy M, Mittal RK. 93.  2013. Willingness of residents to participate in e-waste recycling in India. Environ. Dev. 6:48–68 [Google Scholar]
  94. Birkbeck C. 94.  1978. Self-employed proletarians in an informal factory: the case of Cali's garbage dump. World Dev. 6:9/101177–86 [Google Scholar]
  95. Furedy C. 95.  1984. Survival strategies of the urban poor—scavenging and recuperation in Calcutta. GeoJournal 8:2129–36 [Google Scholar]
  96. Tevere D. 96.  1994. Dump scavenging in Gaborone, Botswana: anachronism or refugee occupation of the poor. Geografiska Ann. 76:B21–32 [Google Scholar]
  97. Beall J. 97.  1997. Thoughts on poverty from a South Asian rubbish dump: gender, inequality and household waste. IDS Bull. 28:373–90 [Google Scholar]
  98. Fredericks R. 98.  2013. Disorderly Dakar: the cultural politics of household waste in Senegal's capital city. J. Mod. Afr. Stud. 51:3435–58 [Google Scholar]
  99. Moore S. 99.  2008. The politics of garbage in Oxaca, Mexico. Soc. Nat. Resour. 21:7597–610 [Google Scholar]
  100. Agunwamba J. 100.  2003. Analysis of scavengers' activities and recycling in some cities in Nigeria. Environ. Manag. 32:1116–27 [Google Scholar]
  101. Hayami Y, Dikshit A, Mishra S. 101.  2006. Waste pickers in Delhi. J. Dev. Stud. 42:141–69 [Google Scholar]
  102. Masocha M. 102.  2006. Informal waste harvesting in Victoria Falls town, Zimbabwe: socio-economic benefits. Habitat Int. 30:838–48 [Google Scholar]
  103. Afon A. 103.  2012. A survey of operational characteristics, socioeconomic and health effects of scavenging activities in Lagos, Nigeria. Waste Manag. Res. 30:7664–71 [Google Scholar]
  104. Asim M, Batool S, Chaudry M. 104.  2012. Scavengers and their role in the recycling of waste in SW Lahore. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 58:152–62 [Google Scholar]
  105. Agarwal A, Singhmar A, Kulshrestha M, Mittal A. 105.  2005. Municipal solid waste recycling and associated markets in Delhi, India. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 44:173–90 [Google Scholar]
  106. Fergutz O, Dias S, Mitlin D. 106.  2011. Developing urban waste management in Brazil with waste picker organisations. Environ. Urban. 23:2597–608 [Google Scholar]
  107. Paul J, Arce-Jaque J, Ravena N, Villamor S. 107.  2012. Integration of the informal sector into municipal solid waste management in the Philippines—what does it need?. Waste Manag. 32:112018–28 [Google Scholar]
  108. Ezeah C, Fazakerley J, Roberts C. 108.  2013. Emerging trends in informal sector recycling in developing and transition countries. Waste Manag. 33:112509–19 [Google Scholar]
  109. Tirado-Soto M, Zamberlan F. 109.  2013. Networks of recyclable material waste-pickers cooperatives: an alternative for the solid waste management in the city of Rio de Janeiro. Waste Manag. 33:1004–12 [Google Scholar]
  110. Gutberlet J. 110.  2008. Empowering collective recycling initiatives: video documentation and action research with a recycling co-op in Brazil. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 52:4657–78 [Google Scholar]
  111. Nzeadibe T. 111.  2009. Solid waste reforms and informal recycling in Enuga urban area, Nigeria. Habitat Int. 33:193–99 [Google Scholar]
  112. Zapata-Campos M, Zapata P. 112.  2013. Switching Managua on! Connecting informal settlements to the formal city through household waste collection. Environ. Urban. 25:1225–42 [Google Scholar]
  113. Beall J. 113.  2006. Dealing with dirt and the disorder of development: managing rubbish in urban Pakistan. Oxf. Dev. Stud. 34:181–97 [Google Scholar]
  114. Whitson R. 114.  2011. Negotiating place and value: geographies of waste and scavenging in Buenos Aires. Antipode 43:41404–33 [Google Scholar]
  115. Miraftab F. 115.  2004. Neoliberalism and casualisation of public sector services: the case of waste collection services in Cape Town, South Africa. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 28:4874–92 [Google Scholar]
  116. Fahmi W. 116.  2005. The impact of privatisation of solid waste management on the Zabaleen garbage collectors of Cairo. Environ. Urban. 17:2155–70 [Google Scholar]
  117. Fahmi W, Sutton K. 117.  2006. Cairo's Zabaleen garbage recyclers: multinationals takeover and state relocation plans. Habitat Int. 30:4809–37 [Google Scholar]
  118. Mitchell C. 118.  2008. Altered landscapes, altered livelihoods: the shifting experience of informal waste collecting during Hanoi's urban transition. Geoforum 39:62019–29 [Google Scholar]
  119. Furniss J. 119.  2010. Private sector reform of Egyptian solid waste management. Participation for What: Social Change or Social Control? GM Gómez, AA Corradi, P Goulart, R Namara 52–75 The Hague, Neth: ISS, Hivos [Google Scholar]
  120. Bjerkli C. 120.  2013. Governance on the ground: a study of solid waste management in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 37:41273–87 [Google Scholar]
  121. Sternberg C. 121.  2013. From “cartoneros” to “recolectores urbanos”: the changing rhetoric and urban waste management policies in Buenos Aires. Geoforum 48:187–95 [Google Scholar]
  122. Obeng-Odoom F. 122.  2014. Green neoliberalism: recycling and sustainable urban development in Sekondi-Takoradi. Habitat Int. 41:129–34 [Google Scholar]
  123. Gill K. 123.  2007. Interlinked contracts and social power: patronage and exploitation in Delhi's waste recovery market. J. Dev. Stud. 43:81448–74 [Google Scholar]
  124. Gill K. 124.  2012. Of Poverty and Plastic: Scavenging and Scrap Trading Entrepreneurs in India's Informal Economy New Delhi, India: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  125. Sasaki S, Araki T. 125.  2013. Employer-employee and buyer-seller relationships among waste pickers at final disposal site in informal recycling: the case of Bantar Gebang in Indonesia. Habitat Int. 40:51–57 [Google Scholar]
  126. Zapata-Campos M, Zapata P. 126.  2014. The travel of global ideas of waste management: the case of Managua and its informal settlements. Habitat Int. 41:41–49 [Google Scholar]
  127. Walker G. 127.  2009. Globalizing environmental justice: the geography and politics of frame contextualisation and evolution. Glob. Soc. Policy 9:3355–82 [Google Scholar]
  128. Bullard R. 128.  1990. Dumping in Dixie Boulder, CO: Westview Press [Google Scholar]
  129. Rootes C. 129.  2009. Environmental movements, waste and waste infrastructure: an introduction. Environ. Polit. 18:6817–34 [Google Scholar]
  130. Bullard R. 130.  2005. The Quest for Environmental Justice: Human rights and the Politics of Pollution San Francisco: Sierra Club Books [Google Scholar]
  131. Hipp J, Lakon C. 131.  2010. Social disparities in health: disproportionate toxicity proximity in minority communities over a decade. Health Place 16:4674–83 [Google Scholar]
  132. Singer M. 132.  2011. Down Cancer Alley: the lived experience of health and environmental suffering in Louisiana's chemical corridor. Med. Anthropol. Q. 25:2141–63 [Google Scholar]
  133. Boone C, Fragkias M, Buckley G, Grove M. 133.  2014. A long view of polluting industry and environmental justice in Baltimore. Cities 36:3141–49 [Google Scholar]
  134. 134. United Church Christ's Comm. Racial Justice 1987. Toxic Waste and Race in the US. New York: United Church of Christ [Google Scholar]
  135. Pulido L. 135.  2000. Rethinking environmental racism: white privilege and urban development in Southern California. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 90:112–40 [Google Scholar]
  136. Baabereyir A, Jewitt S, O'Hara S. 136.  2012. Dumping on the poor: the ecological distribution of Accra's solid waste burden. Environ. Plan. A 44:2297–314 [Google Scholar]
  137. Oteng-Agabio M. 137.  2013. Unscripted (in)justice: exposure to ecological hazards in metropolitan Accra. Environ. Plan. A 45:51199–218 [Google Scholar]
  138. Carruthers D. 138.  2008. Environmental Justice in Latin America: Problems, Promise and Practice Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  139. Frey R. 139.  2003. The transfer of core-based hazardous production processes to the export processing zones of the periphery: the maquiladora centres of Northern Mexico. J. World Syst. Res. IX:317–54 [Google Scholar]
  140. Carruthers D. 140.  2008. The globalization of environmental justice: lessons from the US-Mexico border. Soc. Nat. Resour. 21:7556–68 [Google Scholar]
  141. Johnson M, Niemeyer E. 141.  2008. Ambivalent landscapes: environmental justice in the US-Mexico borderlands. Hum. Ecol. 36:3371–82 [Google Scholar]
  142. Lara-Valencia F, Harlow S, Lemos M, Denman C. 142.  2009. Early dimensions of hazardous waste generation in rapidly industrialising cities along the US border. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 52:2195–216 [Google Scholar]
  143. Grineski S, Collins T. 143.  2008. Exploring patterns of environmental injustice in the Global South: maquiladoras in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico. Popul. Environ. 29:6247–70 [Google Scholar]
  144. Grineski S, Collins T. 144.  2010. Environmental injustice in transnational context: urbanisation and industrial hazards in El Paso/Ciudad Juárez. Environ. Plan. A 42:61308–27 [Google Scholar]
  145. Pellow D. 145.  2008. The global waste trade and environmental justice struggles. Handbook on Trade and the Environment R Gallagher 225–33 Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar [Google Scholar]
  146. Kellenberg D. 146.  2012. Trading wastes. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 64:168–87 [Google Scholar]
  147. Margai F, Barry F. 147.  2011. Global geographies of environmental injustice and health: a case study of illegal hazardous waste dumping in Cote d'Ivoire. Geospatial Analysis of Environmental Health J Maantay, S McLafferty 257–81 Amsterdam: Springer [Google Scholar]
  148. Lepawsky J, McNabb C. 148.  2010. Mapping the international trade and traffic of electronic waste. Can. Geogr. 54:2177–95 [Google Scholar]
  149. Lepawsky J. 149.  2015. The changing geography of global trade in electronic discards: time to rethink the e-waste problem. Geogr. J. 181:147–59 [Google Scholar]
  150. Lepawsky J. 150.  2015. Are we living in a post-Basel world?. Area 47:17–15 [Google Scholar]
  151. Crang M. 151.  2010. The death of great ships: photography, politics and waste in the global imaginary. Environ. Plan. A 42:51084–102 [Google Scholar]
  152. Kellow A. 152.  1999. Baptists and bootleggers? The Basel Convention and metals recycling trade. Agenda 6:129–38 [Google Scholar]
  153. Lyons D, Rice M, Wachal R. 153.  2009. Circuits of scrap: closed loop industrial ecosystems and the geography of US international recyclable flows, 1995–2005. Geogr. J. 175:4286–300 [Google Scholar]
  154. Brooks A. 154.  2015. Clothing Poverty: The Hidden World of Fast Fashion and Second-Hand Goods London: Zed Books [Google Scholar]
  155. Abimbola O. 155.  2012. The international trade in secondhand clothing: managing information asymmetry between West African and British traders. Textile 10:2184–99 [Google Scholar]
  156. Botticello J. 156.  2012. Between classification, objectification and perception: processing secondhand clothing for recycling and reuse. Textile 10:2164–83 [Google Scholar]
  157. Tranberg-Hansen K. 157.  2000. Salaula: The World of Secondhand Clothing and Zambia Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  158. Norris L. 158.  2012. Shoddy rags and relief blankets: perceptions of textile recycling in North India. See Ref. 27 35–58
  159. Brooks A. 159.  2012. Networks of power and corruption: the trade of used Japanese cars to Mozambique. Geogr. J. 178:180–92 [Google Scholar]
  160. Beuving J. 160.  2006. Nigerian second-hand car traders in Cotonou: a sociocultural analysis of economic decision-making. Afr. Aff. 105:3353–73 [Google Scholar]
  161. Brooks A. 161.  2013. Stretching global production networks: the international second-hand clothing trade. Geoforum 44:10–22 [Google Scholar]
  162. Crang M, Hughes A, Gregson N, Ahamed F, Norris L. 162.  2013. Rethinking governance and value in commodity chains through global recycling networks. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 38:112–24 [Google Scholar]
  163. Lawhon M. 163.  2012. Power, trust and legitimacy in the governance of South African e-waste transition. Environ. Plan. A 44:4954–71 [Google Scholar]
  164. Lepawsky J. 164.  2012. Legal geographies of e-waste legislation in Canada and the US: jurisdiction, responsibility and the taboo of production. Geoforum 43:1194–206 [Google Scholar]
  165. Pickren G. 165.  2014. Political ecologies of electronic waste: uncertainty and legitimacy in the governance of e-waste geographies. Environ. Plan. A 46:126–45 [Google Scholar]
  166. Bisschop L. 166.  2012. Is it all going to waste? Illegal transports of e-waste in a European trade hub. Crime Law Soc. Change 58:221–49 [Google Scholar]
  167. Brooks A, Simon D. 167.  2012. Unravelling the relationship between used-clothing imports and the decline of African clothing industries. Dev. Change 43:61265–90 [Google Scholar]
  168. Gregson N, Crang M, Ahamed F, Akter N, Ferdous R. 168.  et al. 2012. Territorial agglomeration and industrial symbiosis: Sitakunda-Bhatiary, Bangladesh as a secondary processing complex. Econ. Geogr. 88:137–58 [Google Scholar]
  169. Gibbs D, Deutz P. 169.  2005. Implementing industrial ecology? Planning for eco-industrial parks in the USA. Geoforum 36:4452–64 [Google Scholar]
  170. Tong X, Li J, Tao D, Cai Y. 170.  2015. Re-making spaces of conversion: deconstructing discourses of e-waste recycling in China. Area 47:131–39 [Google Scholar]
  171. Gregson N, Watkins H, Calestani M. 171.  2013. Political markets: recycling, economization and marketization. Econ. Soc. 42:11–25 [Google Scholar]
  172. Furniss J. 172.  2015. Alternative framings of transnational waste flows: reflections based on the Egypt-China PET plastic trade. Area 47:124–30 [Google Scholar]
  173. Kama K. 173.  2015. Circling the economy: resource-making and marketization in EU electronic waste policy. Area 47:116–23 [ Erratum] [Google Scholar]
  174. Gregson N, Crang M, Botticello J, Calestani M, Krzywozynska A. 174.  2014. Doing the “dirty” work of the green economy: resource recovery and migrant labour in the EU. Eur. Urban Reg. Stud. doi: 10.1177/0969776414554489. http://eur.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/10/29/0969776414554489 [Google Scholar]
  175. Terao T. 175.  2005. The rise and fall of “mixed metal scrap” recovery industry in Taiwan: international trade of scraps and transboundary relocation of the business. International Trade of Recyclable Resources in Asia M. Kojima 63–84 Chiba, Jpn: JETRO [Google Scholar]
  176. Reddy R. 176.  2013. Revitalising economies of disassembly. Econ. Polit. Wkly. 48:1363–71 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021105
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021105
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error