Land Tenure Transitions in the Global South: Trends, Drivers, and Policy Implications

Literature Cited

1. Unruh J. 1.  2008. The carbon sequestration problem in Africa. Glob. Environ. Change 18:4700–7 [Google Scholar]
2. Sunderlin WD, Ekaputri AD, Sills EO, Duchelle AE, Kweka D. 2.  et al. 2014. The challenge of establishing REDD+ on the ground: insights from 23 subnational initiatives in six countries Occas. Pap. 104., Cent. Intl. For. Res., Bogor, Indones. [Google Scholar]
3. Duchelle A, Cromberg M, Gebara MF, Guerra R, Melo T. 3.  et al. 2014. Linking forest tenure reform, environmental compliance, and incentives: lessons from REDD+ initiatives in the Brazilian Amazon. World Dev 55:53–67 [Google Scholar]
4. 4. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
5. Tilman D, Socolow R, Foley JA, Hill J, Larson E. 5.  et al. 2009. Beneficial biofuels—the food, energy, and environment trilemma. Science 325:17279–71 [Google Scholar]
6. Bebbington A, Bury J. 6.  2013. Subterranean Struggles: New Dynamics of Mining, Oil and Gas in Latin America Austin, TX: Univ. Tex. Press [Google Scholar]
7. Wunder S. 7.  2005. Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts Occas. Pap. 42. Cent. Intl. For. Res Bogor, Indones.: [Google Scholar]
8. Wunder S. 8.  2013. When payments for environmental services will work for conservation. Conserv. Lett. 6:4230–37 [Google Scholar]
9. Feder G, Nishio A. 9.  1998. The benefits of land registration and titling: economic and social perspectives. Land Use Policy 15:125–43 [Google Scholar]
10. 10. UN Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2016. What is land tenure? Corp. Doc., FAO Rome, Italy: http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/y4307e/y4307e05.htm [Google Scholar]
11. Agegnehu S, Fuchs H, Navratil G, Stokowski P, Voulo F, Mansberger M. 11.  2016. Spatial urban expansion and land tenure security in Ethiopia: case studies from Bahir Dar and Debre Markos peri-urban areas. Soc. Natur. Resour. 29:3311–28 [Google Scholar]
12. Rattanabirabongse V, Eddington RA, Burns AF, Nettle KG. 12.  1998. The Thailand land titling project—thirteen years of experience. Land Use Policy 15:13–23 [Google Scholar]
13. Lipton M. 13.  2009. Land Reform in Developing Countries: Property Rights and Property Wrongs London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
14. DiMaggio P, Powell WW. 14.  1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48:2147–60 [Google Scholar]
15. Meyer JW, Boli J, Thomas GM, Ramirez FO. 15.  1997. World society and the nation‐state. Am. J. Sociol. 103:1144–81 [Google Scholar]
16. Babb S. 16.  2013. The Washington consensus as policy paradigm: its origins, trajectory, and likely replacement. Rev. Int. Polit. Econ. 20:2268–97 [Google Scholar]
17. Aguirre Beltran G. 17.  1979. Regions of refuge Mongr. 12, Soc. Appl. Anthro Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
18. Demsetz H. 18.  1967. Toward a theory of property rights. Am. Econ. Rev. 57:2347–59 [Google Scholar]
19. Feder G, Feeny D. 19.  Land tenure and property rights: theory and implications for development policy. World Bank Econ. Obs. 5:1135–53 [Google Scholar]
20. De Soto H. 20.  1989. The Other Path: The Invisible Revolution in the Third World New York: Harper Collins [Google Scholar]
21. De Soto H. 21.  2000. The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else New York: Basic Books [Google Scholar]
22. Alston LJ, Libecap GD, Mueller B. 22.  1999. Titles, Conflict, and Land Use: The Development of Property Rights and Land Reform on the Brazilian Amazon Frontier Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. Mich. Press [Google Scholar]
23. Likaka O. 23.  1991. Rural Society and Cotton in Colonial Zaire Madison, Wisc.: Univ. Wisc. Press [Google Scholar]
24. Boeke J. 24.  1953. Economics and Economic Policy of Dual Societies New York: Inst. Pacific Relations [Google Scholar]
25. Higgins B. 25.  1956. The “dualistic” theory of underdeveloped areas. Econ. Devel. Cult. Change 4:99–115 [Google Scholar]
26. Guha R. 26.  2000. The Unquiet Woods: Ecological Change and Peasant Resistance in the Himalaya Berkeley, CA.: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
27. Peluso N. 27.  1992. Rich Forests and Poor People: Resource Control and Resistance in Colonial Java Berkeley, CA: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
28. McElwee PD. 28.  2016. Forests are Gold: Trees, People, and Environmental Rule in Vietnam Seattle, WA: Univ. Wash. Press [Google Scholar]
29. Dean W. 29.  1995. With Broadax and Firebrand: The Destruction of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest Berkeley, CA.: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
30. Tiffen M, Mortimore M, Gichuki F. 30.  1994. More People, Less Erosion: Environmental Recovery in Kenya New York: Wiley [Google Scholar]
31. Migdal J. 31.  1988. Strong Societies and Weak States Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
32. Rudel TK. 32.  1995. Do property rights make a difference? Open access, informal social controls, and deforestation in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Hum. Organ. 54:2187–94 [Google Scholar]
33. Dore RP. 33.  1959. Land Reform in Japan New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
34. Bernstein H. 34.  2002. Land reform: taking a longer view. J. Agrar. Change 2:4433–63 [Google Scholar]
35. Thiesenhusen W. 35.  1995. Broken Promises: Agrarian Reform and the Latin American Campesino Boulder, CO: Westview Press [Google Scholar]
36. Barsky O. 36.  1984. La Reforma Agraria Ecuatoriana Quito, Ecuad.: Corp. Ed. Nac. [Google Scholar]
37. Hecht S, Cockburn A. 37.  1990. The Fate of the Forest: Developers, Destroyers, and Defenders of the Amazon Chicago, Ill.: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
38. Uhlig H. 38.  1988. Spontaneous and planned settlement in Southeast Asia. Agricultural Expansion and Pioneer Settlement in the Humid Tropics W Manshard, W Morgan 7–43 Tokyo, Jpn: UN Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
39. Holden S, Huoslef H. 39.  1995. Transmigration settlement in Seberida: causes and consequences of the deterioration of farming systems of settlers in a rain forest environment. Management of Tropical Forests: Towards an Integrated Perspective O Sandbukt 107–25 Oslo, Norway: Cent. Dev. Environ., Univ. Oslo [Google Scholar]
40. Hiraoka M, Yamamoto S. 40.  1980. Agricultural development in the upper Amazon in Ecuador. Geogr. Rev 70:423–45 [Google Scholar]
41. Rudel TK, Horowitz B. 41.  1993. Tropical Deforestation: Small Farmers and Land Clearing in the Ecuadorian Amazon New York: Columbia Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
42. Scott JC. 42.  1999. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
43. Van der Ploeg JD. 43.  2013. Peasants and the Art of Farming: A Chayanovian Manifesto Halifax/Winnipeg, Can.: Fernwood Publ. [Google Scholar]
44. Chen J, Zinda J, Yeh E. 44.  2017. Recasting the rural: state, society and environment in contemporary China. Geoforum 78:83–88 [Google Scholar]
45. Feng L, Bao H, Jiang Y. 45.  2014. Land reallocation reform in rural China: a behavioral economics perspective. Land Use Policy 41:246–59 [Google Scholar]
46. Wickham-Crowley T. 46.  1994. An epitaph for Latin American revolutionaries. Third World Q 15:528–32 [Google Scholar]
47. Abuza Z. 47.  2011. Borderlands, terrorism, and insurgency in Southeast Asia. The Borderlands of Southeast Asia J Clad, S McDonald, B Vaughn 89–106 Washington, DC: Inst. Natl. Strateg. Stud. [Google Scholar]
48. Jumbe C, Angelsen A. 48.  2006. Do the poor benefit from devolution policies? Evidence from forest co-management in Malawi. Land Econ 82:4562–81 [Google Scholar]
49. Larson A, Ribot J. 49.  2009. Lessons from forestry decentralization. Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options A Angelsen, M Brockhaus, M Kanninen, E Sill, WD Sunderlin, S Wertz-Kanounnikoff 175–87 Bogor, Indones.: Cent. Intl. For. Res. [Google Scholar]
50. Gray L. 50.  2006. Decentralization, land policy, and the politics of scale in Burkina Faso. Globalization and New Geographies of Conservation K Zimmerer 277–95 Chicago, Ill.: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
51. Van de Walle N. 51.  2001. African Economies and the Politics of Permanent Crisis Cambridge, UK.: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
52. Weber M. 52.  1968. Economy and Society New York: Bedminster Press [Google Scholar]
53. Agrawal A, Ostrom E. 53.  2001. Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Polit. Soc. 29:4485–514 [Google Scholar]
54. German L, Mandondo A, Paumgarten F, Mwitwa J. 54.  2014. Shifting rights, property, and authority in the forest frontier: stakes for local land users and citizens. J. Peasant Stud. 41:15–78 [Google Scholar]
55. Borras SM, Hall R, Scoones I, White B, Wolford W. 55.  2011. Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: an editorial introduction. J. Peasant Stud. 38:2209–16 [Google Scholar]
56. Messerli P, Giger M, Dwyer MB, Breu T, Eckert S. 56.  2014. The geography of large-scale land acquisitions: analyzing socio-ecological patterns of target contexts in the Global South. Appl. Geogr. 53:449–59 [Google Scholar]
57. Anaafo D. 57.  2015. Land reforms and land rights change: a case study of land stressed groups in the Nkoranza South Municipality, Ghana. Land Use Policy 42:538–46 [Google Scholar]
58. Schoneveld GC, German L. 58.  2013. Translating legal rights into tenure security: lessons from the new commercial pressures on land in Ghana. Dev. Stud. 50:2187–203 [Google Scholar]
59. 59. Netting R. Mac, 1993. Smallholders, Householders: The Ecology of Small-scale, Sustainable Agriculture Stanford, CA.: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
60. Rudel TK. 60.  2005. Tropical Forests: Regional Paths of Destruction and Regeneration in the Late Twentieth Century New York: Columbia Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
61. Agrawal A. 61.  2005. Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects Durham, NC/London: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
62. Besley T, Burgess R. 62.  2000. Land reform, poverty reduction, and growth: evidence from India. Q J Econ 115:2389–430 [Google Scholar]
63. O'Rourke D. 63.  2004. Community-Driven Regulation: Balancing Environment and Development in Vietnam Cambridge, Mass.: Mass. Inst. Technol. Press [Google Scholar]
64. Curran LM, Trigg SN, McDonald AK, Astiani D, Hardiono YM, Siregar P. 64.  2004. Lowland forest loss in protected areas of Indonesian Borneo. Science 303:56601000–3 [Google Scholar]
65. Schmink M, Wood CH. 65.  1992. Contested Frontiers in Amazonia New York: Columbia Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
66. Wolford W. 66.  2010. This Land is Ours Now: Social Mobilization and the Meanings of Land in Brazil Durham, NC/London: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
67. Jayne TS, Chamberlin J, Headey DD. 67.  2014. Land pressures, the evolution of farming systems, and development strategies in Africa: a synthesis. Food Policy 48:1–17 [Google Scholar]
68. Amaluiza C, Segovia M. 68.  1977. Un Grupo Shuar Marginado y Dependiente Sucua, Ecuad.: Mundo Shuar [Google Scholar]
69. Rudel TK, Katan T, Horowitz B. 69.  2013. Amerindian livelihoods, outside interventions, and poverty traps in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Rural Sociol 78:2167–85 [Google Scholar]
70. Casson A. 70.  2000. The hesitant boom: Indonesia's oil palm sub-sector in an era of economic crisis and political change Occas. Pap. 29 Cent. Intl. For. Res., Bogor Indones.: [Google Scholar]
71. Wakker E. 71.  2006. The Kalimantan Border Oil Palm Mega-Project Rep. Friends Earth Amsterdam: https://www.foe.co.uk/sites/default/files/downloads/palm_oil_mega_project.pdf [Google Scholar]
72. 72. World Wildlife Fund. 2015. Heart of Borneo Milestones: Highlights of the journey towards the Heart of Borneo Initiative http://wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/where_we_work/borneo_forests/about_borneo_forests/borneo_conservation_milestones/ [Google Scholar]
73. Restrepo E. 73.  2013. Etnización de la negridad: la Invención de las comunidades negraś como grupo étnico en Colombia Popayán, Colomb.: Univ. del Cauca [Google Scholar]
74. Yashar D. 74.  2005. Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Post-liberal Challenge Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press [Google Scholar]
75. Vergara-Aenjo G, Potvin C. 75.  2014. Forest protection and tenure status: the key role of indigenous peoples and protected areas in Panama. Glob. Environ. Change 28:205–15 [Google Scholar]
76. Asher K. 76.  2009. Black and Green. Afro-Colombians, Development and Nature in the Pacific Lowlands. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
77. Hernandez M. 77.  2010. De colectivo a comunitario: El encuentro entre valores católicos y propuestas de desarrollo en la configuración de la identidad étnica en el Medio Atrato, Chocó. Desarrollo y Conflicto. Territorios, Recursos y Paisajes en la Historia Oculta de Proyectos y Políticas. M Serje 233–64 Univ. Andes [Google Scholar]
78. Smith J, Wiest D. 78.  2012. Social Movements in the World System: The Politics of Crisis and Transformation New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
79. Sierra R, Stallings J. 79.  1998. The dynamics and social organization of deforestation in northwest Ecuador, 1983–1995. Hum. Ecol. 26:1135–61 [Google Scholar]
80. Salvini G, Herold M, Brockhaus M. 80.  2014. How countries link REDD+ interventions to drivers in their readiness plans: implications for monitoring systems. Environ. Res. Lett. 9:7 [Google Scholar]
81. Uchida E, Xu J, Rozelle S. 81.  2005. Grain for green: cost-effectiveness and sustainability of China's conservation set-aside program. Land Econ 81:2247–64 [Google Scholar]
82. Rudel TK. 82.  2015. Climate Change Funds Go to the Organized: A Least Likely Case from the Ecuadorian Amazon Work. Pap., Dept. of Human Ecology, Rutgers Univ. [Google Scholar]